Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry related to this topic through the link below:
Check Note
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 2258 word(s) 2258 2021-11-03 04:41:54 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 2258 2021-11-04 01:44:56 |
T Cell Chemotaxis and Infiltration in Glioblastoma
Upload a video

Glioblastoma is an immunologically ‘cold’ tumor, which are characterized by absent or minimal numbers of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). For those tumors that have been invaded by lymphocytes, they are profoundly exhausted and ineffective. While many immunotherapy approaches seek to reinvigorate immune cells at the tumor, this requires TILs to be present. 

  • immunotherapy
  • glioblastoma
  • T cells
  • T lymphocytes
Contributor :
View Times: 42
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Time: 04 Nov 2021

1. Introduction

Immune surveillance of the central nervous system (CNS) is essential for environmental homeostasis and pathogen clearance. Without immune surveillance, opportunistic infections in the CNS commonly develop [1]. However, the entry of immune cells into the CNS is tightly controlled by the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and the blood–cerebrospinal fluid (BCSF) barrier. These formidable barriers lack fenestrations, exhibit a low degree of pinocytosis, and are sealed together by a network of intracellular junctions [2][3]. While this close control is desirable in health to avoid runaway immune responses in the CNS, restricted immune cell entry severely hampers the effectiveness of immunotherapy in glioblastoma [4]. This is further complicated by the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), which consists of endothelial cells, pericytes, fibroblasts, and regulatory immune cells [5]. The TME drives effector immune cell exhaustion, thereby shielding solid malignancies from immune attack [6]. While immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) seeks to reverse this exhausted state and ‘release the brakes’ on regional T cells, it is notable that the evaluation of resected stage IV gliomas are either devoid or demonstrate limited numbers of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) [7][8]. This would suggest that ICI will struggle owing to the lack of targets to reinvigorate. Indeed, initial trials of ICI in glioblastoma have failed [9]. However, when ICI is combined with increased numbers of functional TILs in pre-clinical models, long-term survival can be achieved [10][11]

While the CNS does host several immune cell classes, including T cells, these immune cells are clustered away from the tumor-bearing parenchyma in regions such as the choroid plexus, the meninges (containing the subarachnoid and perivascular spaces), and the CSF [12][13][14][15][16][17]. The clinical implications of this clustering were recognized as long ago as 1923, where Murphy and Sturm confirmed Shirai’s initial finding that foreign tumors in the parenchyma could grow, but tumors implanted close to the ventricles (and thus the immune interfaces) were rejected [18]. Fortunately, immune responses in the CNS can be bolstered by an adaptive response originating from the periphery. Medawar demonstrated in 1948 that tumors implanted into brain tissue can be rejected following exposure to tumor antigens outside of the CNS [19]. Recruitment of peripheral T cells into the parenchyma also occurs in multiple sclerosis (MS) and its animal analogue experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE) [20].

Even though adaptive immune clearance of tumors is possible, glioblastoma possesses several mechanisms that suppress the recruitment and functioning of T cells. Glioblastoma expresses decreased levels of lymphangiogenesis-promoting factors such as VEGF-C, reducing potential routes for T cell ingress, while the highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) blunts the response of any lymphocytes that reach the tumor [21][22][23].

2. The Glia Limitans—Accessing the Parenchyma

Between the outer BBB and the parenchyma lies the glia limitans. The glia limitans is formed by astrocyte foot processes associating with the basal lamina of the parenchyma [24]. It is divided into two membranes: the glia limitans perivascularis (surrounding blood vessels) and the glia limitans superficialis (covering the surface of the brain) [25]. In much of the brain, these two membranes lie so closely together that they are indistinguishable, but beyond the capillaries at the venules, inflammation can cause these two membranes to separate, forming a perivascular space. This space communicates with the CSF and allows for APCs to present antigens to entering T cells [26]. This interaction is critical in allowing T cells to access the parenchyma—indeed, the effects of T cells in EAE only begin once immune cells have crossed the glia limitans [27]. The APC–T cell interaction drives the production of further pro-inflammatory cytokines which triggers the recruitment of more immune cells [28][29]. Interestingly, while the initial T cells that enter these perivascular spaces tend to have increased expression of CCR6, further recruitment occurs in a CCR6-independent manner [24][28]. This would suggest that CCR6+ T cells form part of an initial ‘licensing’ step and that their interaction with APCs in the perivascular spaces facilitates further entry of T cells in a non-CCR6-specific manner.
In normal physiology, T cell crossing at the glia limitans is mediated by the expression of laminins [30]. For example, the parenchymal membrane of the glia limitans contains α1 and α2 laminins [31], which CD4+ T cells are unable to bind in the non-inflammatory state. However, in EAE, CD4+ T cells can bypass this control mechanism by using matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) which disrupt the astrocytic foot processes, breaking down barrier integrity and allowing for T cell ingress [27]. While this might suggest that MMP agonism may be an attractive prospect for opening the glia limitans, MMPs are involved in the angiogenesis and invasion of glioma [32]. Inhibition of MMP was even trialed using a broad-spectrum MMP inhibitor, but this resulted in widespread reports of musculoskeletal toxicity due to on-target, off-tumor effects [33][34]. Given these experiences, it is unlikely that MMP agonism in glioblastoma will be a desirable therapeutic target.
Another mediator of T cell entry into the parenchyma is CXCL12. In murine models, T cells have been noted to be held in perivascular spaces due to expression of CXCL12 [35]. This ‘hold’ is released in inflammatory conditions, as increased levels of IL-17 drive the expression of CXCR7 on endothelial cells, resulting in the internalization of CXCL12 [36]. This leads to increased CXCR4 expression on T cells and subsequent T cell entry into the parenchyma [35][36]. However, when considering the downregulation of CXCL12 as a therapeutic strategy, it is worth noting that recent studies evaluating T cell responses to viral infection in vitro have found that CXCL12 at the BBB endothelium can promote CD8+ migration across the BCSF interface, suggestive of a location-dependent role [37].

3. T Cell Trafficking through the Parenchyma

Once past the glia limitans, effector T cells must reach and infiltrate the tumor to exert their cytotoxic effect. As discussed in the introduction, glioblastoma can restrict T cell trafficking due to the downregulated expression of VEGF-C, resulting in restricted lymphangiogenesis [22]. Notably, in patients treated with neoadjuvant anti-PD-1, VEGF-C expression was highly correlated with increased infiltration of T cells [38]. Thus, restoring levels of lymphangiogenesis-promoting factors such as VEGF-C could also enhance T cell homing and infiltration to the tumor. This is supported by the findings of Song et al., who demonstrated that intra-cisterna magna injections of an adeno-associated viral vector coding for VEGF-C could remodel meningeal lymphatic vessels in murine models of glioma [22]. Further enhanced expression of VEGF-C in lymphatic endothelial cells could potentiate the effect of checkpoint blockade due to enhanced T cell infiltration [22].

T cell motility is also dependent on metabolic pathways that are often usurped by rapidly proliferating tumors. Tumor cells demonstrate increased glucose uptake and lactose production, even in the presence of oxygen and functioning mitochondria (known as the Warburg effect) [39][40]. This affords the tumor and other rapidly proliferating cells essential anabolic precursors for cell proliferation [40]. The increased glucose demand by tumor cells therefore decreases the amount available for circulating T cells to maintain effector and migratory function [41]. Aerobic glycolysis is the main source of ATP production in leukocytes, which is required for the energetic demands of migration [42][43]. Inhibition of the T cell glycolytic pathway through administration of 2-DG and rapamycin causes a decrease in naïve T cell motility, demonstrating the importance of glucose in T cell homing [44][45]. The associated build-up of lactate caused by the Warburg effect also results in decreased migration of CD4 + T cells and a loss of cytolytic function of CD8 + T cells by interfering with T cell glycolysis [45][46][47][48]. However, this effect can be reversed, as demonstrated in an animal model of peritonitis where antibody-mediated blockade of lactate transporters on T cells allowed them to maintain their migratory potential [49]. Expression of CTLA-4 decreases the expression of the glucose transporter GLUT-1 on T cells, and further decreases effector function, implying that combinatorial approaches using checkpoint blockade may aid with T cell trafficking as well as reinvigoration of function [42][50]. However, recent work suggests that exhausted human CD8 + T cells may actually become more mobile [51]. CTLA-4 signaling can lead to a RAP1-mediated increase in LFA-1 binding, which can induce migration [52]. This has potential implications for considering which form of ICI would best work with a tumor where T cell trafficking poses a significant challenge. An overview of the metabolic pathways limiting T cell efficacy in glioblastoma is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Glioblastoma effects on T cell metabolism and motility. As a rapidly dividing tumor, glioblastoma rapidly takes up glucose and produces lactate (the Warburg effect). Lack of glucose results in decreased GLUT1 binding (also downregulated by CTLA4) and downregulates effector function and motility. Increased lactate is internalized in T cells, where it also inhibits glycolysis and interferes with cytoskeleton rearrangement, resulting in decreased T cell migration. Produced using Biorender.

Another mediator of T cell glycolysis is the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, whose activation can also downregulate the expression of adhesion and migration molecules CD62L, CCR7, and S1P1 in CD8 + T cells [42][53]. Loss of S1P1 has been shown to mediate T cell sequestration in bone marrow in glioblastoma, while S1P1 + cells are resistant to sequestration and can return into the circulation [42][54][55][56]. Therefore, reversing sequestration will be critical for future immunotherapy efficacy and is currently the subject of ongoing therapeutic investigation [57]. While one approach may be to inhibit the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, this inhibition must be selective, as AKT possesses three isoforms which have varying pro- and anti-tumor effects. AKT signaling also plays an important role for the development of effector-like memory CD8 + T cells necessary for tumor immune surveillance [58]. Interestingly, recent work has described small-molecule inhibitors that may be capable of targeting pathogenic AKT isoforms only (AKT1 and AKT2) while leaving the tumor-suppressive functionality of AKT3 intact [59][60]. Indeed, specific AKT1 and 2 inhibition has been associated with enhanced central memory CD8 + T cell proliferation with prolonged cytokine and Granzyme B production, making this a potential future therapeutic strategy [58][59][60][61].

4. The Tumor Microenvironment

Once T cells traffic past the BBB and through the parenchyma, they will encounter the highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. This is made up of regulatory T cells (CD4 + CD25 + FOXP3 + ), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), as well as other stromal cells such as GSC-derived pericytes [23][62]. These can all work to suppress effector T cell function. Regulatory T cells induce T cell exhaustion and apoptosis, signaling via programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) , T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 3 (TIM-3), and others [63][64]. They also can dampen the production of inflammatory cytokines and CTL proliferation by downregulating interleukin-2 and interferon-γ [65]. Gliomas are adept at recruiting regulatory T cells to the microenvironment by over-production of factors such as indoleamine 2,3 -dioxygenase-1 (IDO-1) [66]. As mentioned previously, GSC-derived pericytes also secrete CCL5, which can promote the recruitment of regulatory T cells to the TME [67]. Stromal cells in the microenvironment also produce highly immunosuppressive cytokines, such as transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) [68][69].

Despite the numerous targets for blockade, it is notable that ICI and the interruption of pro-tumor metabolic pathways have failed as a monotherapy [9][70]. Increasingly, attention is turning towards combinatorial therapies, where multiple drivers of T cell exhaustion can be blocked simultaneously [71]. This includes using bispecific antibodies against TGF-β and PD-L1 or against PD-L1 and the anti-agonist CD27 [72][73][74]. These approaches are currently being evaluated in Phase I trials in advanced solid tumors (NCT04429542, NCT04440943). Cytokine modulation approaches are also a potential avenue for enhancing T cell activity in the TME, as seen in ‘armored’ CAR-T constructs. The addition of IL-12, IL-15, or IL-18 along with antigen specificity to T cells appears to result in greater CTL activity and anti-tumor efficacy [75][76][77]. A high percentage of regulatory T cells in the peripheral blood of GBM patients express CCR4 compared to controls (74 vs. 43%) [78]. CCL4 binds CCL22 (and others), which has been shown to be overexpressed in freshly resected human glioma cells, and blockade of CCR4 in vitro can significantly reduce regulatory T cell migration [78]. Targeting fibroblast activation proteins or introducing heparinase-expressing agents may also help to disrupt immunosuppressive stromal elements [46][79][80]. Intratumoral APCs are also necessary to stimulate and retain infiltrating lymphocytes at the tumor site, as well as carrying antigens to draining lymph nodes and cross priming peripheral CD8 T cells [81][82][83]. The administration of intratumoral FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt3L) and poly I:C has been shown to expand and mature dendritic cell precursors, resulting in greater antitumor efficacy when combined with immunotherapies such as PD-L1 blockade or oncolytic herpes simplex viruses [81][84].

Standard-of-care therapies also can help drive a more potent immune response. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an alkylating chemotherapy whose main function is to induce DNA double-stranded breaks, resulting in tumor cell death [85]. Interestingly, TMZ can also help to reduce the numbers of peripheral regulatory T cells, as well as interrupting their migration [86][87]. In disease states such as glioblastoma, tumor cells and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRβ)-expressing cells of the neurovascular sub-units (such as pericytes and perivascular fibroblast-like cells) produce CCL2 to recruit regulatory T cells and dampen the effector response [88]. TMZ interrupts the CCL2–CCR4 axis, thereby reducing this effect [86][87]. Combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy also can help to polarize the T cell response to a cytotoxic phenotype by inducing greater T cell receptor diversity and expanding the numbers of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and effector memory T cells [89]. In pre-clinical murine models of glioma, radiotherapy combined with antibodies against markers of exhaustion such as TIM-3 and PD-1 was able to produce long-term survival [11].


  1. Klein, R.S.; Hunter, C.A. Protective and Pathological Immunity during Central Nervous System Infections. Immunity 2017, 46, 891–909.
  2. Daneman, R.; Prat, A. The blood-brain barrier. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7, a020412.
  3. Engelhardt, B.; Sorokin, L. The blood-brain and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers: Function and dysfunction. Semin. Immunopathol. 2009, 31, 497–511.
  4. Khasraw, M.; Reardon, D.A.; Weller, M.; Sampson, J.H. PD-1 Inhibitors: Do they have a Future in the Treatment of Glioblastoma? Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 5287–5296.
  5. Quail, D.F.; Joyce, J.A. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 1423–1437.
  6. Quail, D.F.; Joyce, J.A. The Microenvironmental Landscape of Brain Tumors. Cancer Cell 2017, 31, 326–341.
  7. Yeung, J.T.; Hamilton, R.L.; Ohnishi, K.; Ikeura, M.; Potter, D.M.; Nikiforova, M.N.; Ferrone, S.; Jakacki, R.I.; Pollack, I.F.; Okada, H. LOH in the HLA Class I Region at 6p21 Is Associated with Shorter Survival in Newly Diagnosed Adult Glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 1816–1826.
  8. Johanns, T.M.; Bowman-Kirigin, J.A.; Liu, C.; Dunn, G.P. Targeting Neoantigens in Glioblastoma: An Overview of Cancer Immunogenomics and Translational Implications. Neurosurgery 2017, 64, 165–176.
  9. Reardon, D.A.; Brandes, A.A.; Omuro, A.; Mulholland, P.; Lim, M.; Wick, A.; Baehring, J.; Ahluwalia, M.S.; Roth, P.; Bähr, O.; et al. Effect of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: The CheckMate 143 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020, 6, 1003–1010.
  10. Garzon-Muvdi, T.; Theodros, D.; Luksik, A.S.; Maxwell, R.; Kim, E.; Jackson, C.M.; Belcaid, Z.; Ganguly, S.; Tyler, B.; Brem, H.; et al. Dendritic cell activation enhances anti-PD-1 mediated immunotherapy against glioblastoma. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 20681–20697.
  11. Kim, J.E.; Patel, M.A.; Mangraviti, A.; Kim, E.S.; Theodros, D.; Velarde, E.; Liu, A.; Sankey, E.W.; Tam, A.; Xu, H.; et al. Combination Therapy with Anti-PD-1, Anti-TIM-3, and Focal Radiation Results in Regression of Murine Gliomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 124–136.
  12. Ellwardt, E.; Walsh, J.T.; Kipnis, J.; Zipp, F. Understanding the Role of T Cells in CNS Homeostasis. Trends Immunol. 2016, 37, 154–165.
  13. Ziv, Y.; Ron, N.; Butovsky, O.; Landa, G.; Sudai, E.; Greenberg, N.; Cohen, H.; Kipnis, J.; Schwartz, M. Immune cells contribute to the maintenance of neurogenesis and spatial learning abilities in adulthood. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9, 268–275.
  14. Kipnis, J.; Cohen, H.; Cardon, M.; Ziv, Y.; Schwartz, M. T cell deficiency leads to cognitive dysfunction: Implications for therapeutic vaccination for schizophrenia and other psychiatric conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 8180–8185.
  15. Engelhardt, B.; Vajkoczy, P.; Weller, R.O. The movers and shapers in immune privilege of the CNS. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 123–131.
  16. Baruch, K.; Schwartz, M. CNS-specific T cells shape brain function via the choroid plexus. Brain Behav. Immun. 2013, 34, 11–16.
  17. Korin, B.; Ben-Shaanan, T.L.; Schiller, M.; Dubovik, T.; Azulay-Debby, H.; Boshnak, N.T.; Koren, T.; Rolls, A. High-dimensional, single-cell characterization of the brain’s immune compartment. Nat. Neurosci. 2017, 20, 1300–1309.
  18. Murphy, J.B.; Sturm, E. Conditions determining the transplantability of tissues in the brain. J. Exp. Med. 1923, 38, 183–197.
  19. Medawar, P.B. Immunity to homologous grafted skin; the fate of skin homografts transplanted to the brain, to subcutaneous tissue, and to the anterior chamber of the eye. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1948, 29, 58–69.
  20. Schläger, C.; Körner, H.; Krueger, M.; Vidoli, S.; Haberl, M.; Mielke, D.; Brylla, E.; Issekutz, T.; Cabañas, C.; Nelson, P.J.; et al. Effector T-cell trafficking between the leptomeninges and the cerebrospinal fluid. Nature 2016, 530, 349–353.
  21. Hu, X.; Deng, Q.; Ma, L.; Li, Q.; Chen, Y.; Liao, Y.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, C.; Shao, L.; Feng, J.; et al. Meningeal lymphatic vessels regulate brain tumor drainage and immunity. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 229–243.
  22. Song, E.; Mao, T.; Dong, H.; Boisserand, L.S.B.; Antila, S.; Bosenberg, M.; Alitalo, K.; Thomas, J.-L.; Iwasaki, A. VEGF-C-driven lymphatic drainage enables immunosurveillance of brain tumours. Nature 2020, 577, 689–694.
  23. Tomaszewski, W.; Sanchez-Perez, L.; Gajewski, T.F.; Sampson, J.H. Brain Tumor Microenvironment and Host State: Implications for Immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 4202–4210.
  24. Engelhardt, B.; Carare, R.O.; Bechmann, I.; Flügel, A.; Laman, J.D.; Weller, R.O. Vascular, glial, and lymphatic immune gateways of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2016, 132, 317–338.
  25. Owens, T.; Bechmann, I.; Engelhardt, B. Perivascular Spaces and the Two Steps to Neuroinflammation. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2008, 67, 1113–1121.
  26. Mundt, S.; Mrdjen, D.; Utz, S.G.; Greter, M.; Schreiner, B.; Becher, B. Conventional DCs sample and present myelin antigens in the healthy CNS and allow parenchymal T cell entry to initiate neuroinflammation. Sci. Immunol. 2019, 4.
  27. Agrawal, S.; Anderson, P.; Durbeej, M.; van Rooijen, N.; Ivars, F.; Opdenakker, G.; Sorokin, L.M. Dystroglycan is selectively cleaved at the parenchymal basement membrane at sites of leukocyte extravasation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 1007–1019.
  28. Reboldi, A.; Coisne, C.; Baumjohann, D.; Benvenuto, F.; Bottinelli, D.; Lira, S.; Uccelli, A.; Lanzavecchia, A.; Engelhardt, B.; Sallusto, F. C-C chemokine receptor 6-regulated entry of TH-17 cells into the CNS through the choroid plexus is required for the initiation of EAE. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 514–523.
  29. Tzartos, J.S.; Friese, M.A.; Craner, M.J.; Palace, J.; Newcombe, J.; Esiri, M.M.; Fugger, L. Interleukin-17 production in central nervous system-infiltrating T cells and glial cells is associated with active disease in multiple sclerosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2008, 172, 146–155.
  30. Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Song, J.; Gerwien, H.; Chuquisana, O.; Chashchina, A.; Denz, C.; Sorokin, L. The endothelial basement membrane acts as a checkpoint for entry of pathogenic T cells into the brain. J. Exp. Med. 2020, 217, e20191339.
  31. Sixt, M.; Engelhardt, B.; Pausch, F.; Hallmann, R.; Wendler, O.; Sorokin, L.M. Endothelial cell laminin isoforms, laminins 8 and 10, play decisive roles in T cell recruitment across the blood-brain barrier in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 153, 933–946.
  32. Pullen, N.A.; Anand, M.; Cooper, P.S.; Fillmore, H.L. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 expression enhances tumorigenicity as well as tumor-related angiogenesis and is inversely associated with TIMP-4 expression in a model of glioblastoma. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2012, 106, 461–471.
  33. Steward, W.P.; Thomas, A.L. Marimastat: The clinical development of a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2000, 9, 2913–2922.
  34. Butler, G.S.; Overall, C.M. Updated biological roles for matrix metalloproteinases and new “intracellular” substrates revealed by degradomics. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 10830–10845.
  35. McCandless, E.E.; Wang, Q.; Woerner, B.M.; Harper, J.M.; Klein, R.S. CXCL12 limits inflammation by localizing mononuclear infiltrates to the perivascular space during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 8053–8064.
  36. Cruz-Orengo, L.; Holman, D.W.; Dorsey, D.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, P.; Wright, M.; McCandless, E.E.; Patel, J.R.; Luker, G.D.; Littman, D.R.; et al. CXCR7 influences leukocyte entry into the CNS parenchyma by controlling abluminal CXCL12 abundance during autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 327–339.
  37. Wiatr, M.; Stump-Guthier, C.; Latorre, D.; Uhlig, S.; Weiss, C.; Ilonen, J.; Engelhardt, B.; Ishikawa, H.; Schwerk, C.; Schroten, H.; et al. Distinct migratory pattern of naive and effector T cells through the blood-CSF barrier following Echovirus 30 infection. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 16, 232.
  38. Cloughesy, T.F.; Mochizuki, A.Y.; Orpilla, J.R.; Hugo, W.; Lee, A.H.; Davidson, T.B.; Wang, A.C.; Ellingson, B.M.; Rytlewski, J.A.; Sanders, C.M.; et al. Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy promotes a survival benefit with intratumoral and systemic immune responses in recurrent glioblastoma. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 477–486.
  39. Strickland, M.; Stoll, E.A. Metabolic Reprogramming in Glioma. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017, 5, 43.
  40. Poff, A.; Koutnik, A.P.; Egan, K.M.; Sahebjam, S.; D’Agostino, D.; Kumar, N.B. Targeting the Warburg effect for cancer treatment: Ketogenic diets for management of glioma. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2019, 56, 135–148.
  41. Macintyre, A.N.; Gerriets, V.A.; Nichols, A.G.; Michalek, R.D.; Rudolph, M.C.; Deoliveira, D.; Anderson, S.M.; Abel, E.D.; Chen, B.J.; Hale, L.P.; et al. The glucose transporter Glut1 is selectively essential for CD4 T cell activation and effector function. Cell Metab. 2014, 20, 61–72.
  42. Mauro, C.; Fu, H.; Marelli-Berg, F.M. T cell trafficking and metabolism: Novel mechanisms and targets for immunomodulation. Curr. Opin. Pharm. 2012, 12, 452–457.
  43. Marelli-Berg, F.M.; Jangani, M. Metabolic regulation of leukocyte motility and migration. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2018, 104, 285–293.
  44. Chapman, N.M.; Boothby, M.R.; Chi, H. Metabolic coordination of T cell quiescence and activation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 55–70.
  45. Lim, A.R.; Rathmell, W.K.; Rathmell, J.C. The tumor microenvironment as a metabolic barrier to effector T cells and immunotherapy. Elife 2020, 9, e55185.
  46. Haas, R.; Smith, J.; Rocher-Ros, V.; Nadkarni, S.; Montero-Melendez, T.; D’Acquisto, F.; Bland, E.J.; Bombardieri, M.; Pitzalis, C.; Perretti, M.; et al. Lactate Regulates Metabolic and Pro-inflammatory Circuits in Control of T Cell Migration and Effector Functions. PLoS Biol. 2015, 13, e1002202.
  47. Fischer, K.; Hoffmann, P.; Voelkl, S.; Meidenbauer, N.; Ammer, J.; Edinger, M.; Gottfried, E.; Schwarz, S.; Rothe, G.; Hoves, S.; et al. Inhibitory effect of tumor cell-derived lactic acid on human T cells. Blood 2007, 109, 3812–3819.
  48. Hu, J.; Mao, Y.; Li, M.; Lu, Y. The profile of Th17 subset in glioma. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2011, 11, 1173–1179.
  49. Kramer, P.A.; Chacko, B.K.; George, D.J.; Zhi, D.; Wei, C.C.; Dell’Italia, L.J.; Melby, S.J.; George, J.F.; Darley-Usmar, V.M. Decreased Bioenergetic Health Index in monocytes isolated from the pericardial fluid and blood of post-operative cardiac surgery patients. Biosci. Rep. 2015, 35, e00237.
  50. Oelkrug, C.; Ramage, J.M. Enhancement of T cell recruitment and infiltration into tumours. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2014, 178, 1–8.
  51. You, R.; Artichoker, J.; Fries, A.; Edwards, A.W.; Combes, A.J.; Reeder, G.C.; Samad, B.; Krummel, M.F. Active surveillance characterizes human intratumoral T cell exhaustion. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131.
  52. Kloog, Y.; Mor, A. Cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte antigen 4 receptor signaling for lymphocyte adhesion is mediated by C3G and Rap1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2014, 34, 978–988.
  53. Finlay, D.; Cantrell, D.A. Metabolism, migration and memory in cytotoxic T cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 109–117.
  54. Garris, C.S.; Blaho, V.A.; Hla, T.; Han, M.H. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 signalling in T cells: Trafficking and beyond. Immunology 2014, 142, 347–353.
  55. Chongsathidkiet, P.; Jackson, C.; Koyama, S.; Loebel, F.; Cui, X.; Farber, S.H.; Woroniecka, K.; Elsamadicy, A.A.; Dechant, C.A.; Kemeny, H.R.; et al. Sequestration of T cells in bone marrow in the setting of glioblastoma and other intracranial tumors. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1459–1468.
  56. Wilkinson, D.S.; Chongsathidkiet, P.; Dechant, C.; Fecci, P. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) loss mediates T cell sequestration in bone marrow in the setting of intracranial tumors: A novel mode of cancer-induced immunosuppression. J. Immunol. 2019, 202, 138.135.
  57. Wilkinson, D.S.; Champion, C.; Chongsathidkiet, P.; Wang, H.; Laskowitz, D.; Fecci, P. Bone marrow T cell sequestration as a novel mode of CNS immune privilege. J. Immunol. 2020, 204, 78.14.
  58. Rogel, A.; Willoughby, J.E.; Buchan, S.L.; Leonard, H.J.; Thirdborough, S.M.; Al-Shamkhani, A. Akt signaling is critical for memory CD8(+) T-cell development and tumor immune surveillance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E1178–E1187.
  59. Joy, A.; Kapoor, M.; Georges, J.; Butler, L.; Chang, Y.; Li, C.; Crouch, A.; Smirnov, I.; Nakada, M.; Hepler, J.; et al. The role of AKT isoforms in glioblastoma: AKT3 delays tumor progression. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2016, 130, 43–52.
  60. Quambusch, L.; Depta, L.; Landel, I.; Lubeck, M.; Kirschner, T.; Nabert, J.; Uhlenbrock, N.; Weisner, J.; Kostka, M.; Levy, L.M.; et al. Cellular model system to dissect the isoform-selectivity of Akt inhibitors. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5297.
  61. Abu Eid, R.; Friedman, K.M.; Mkrtichyan, M.; Walens, A.; King, W.; Janik, J.; Khleif, S.N. Akt1 and -2 inhibition diminishes terminal differentiation and enhances central memory CD8(+) T-cell proliferation and survival. Oncoimmunology 2015, 4, e1005448.
  62. Guedan, S.; Ruella, M.; June, C.H. Emerging Cellular Therapies for Cancer. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 37, 145–171.
  63. Kmiecik, J.; Poli, A.; Brons, N.H.; Waha, A.; Eide, G.E.; Enger, P.; Zimmer, J.; Chekenya, M. Elevated CD3+ and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating immune cells correlate with prolonged survival in glioblastoma patients despite integrated immunosuppressive mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment and at the systemic level. J. Neuroimmunol. 2013, 264, 71–83.
  64. El Andaloussi, A.; Lesniak, M.S. An increase in CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes of human glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro-Oncology 2006, 8, 234–243.
  65. Thornton, A.M.; Shevach, E.M. CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells suppress polyclonal T cell activation in vitro by inhibiting interleukin 2 production. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 188, 287–296.
  66. Uyttenhove, C.; Pilotte, L.; Théate, I.; Stroobant, V.; Colau, D.; Parmentier, N.; Boon, T.; Van den Eynde, B.J. Evidence for a tumoral immune resistance mechanism based on tryptophan degradation by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 1269–1274.
  67. Zhang, X.-N.; Yang, K.-D.; Chen, C.; He, Z.-C.; Wang, Q.-H.; Feng, H.; Lv, S.-Q.; Wang, Y.; Mao, M.; Liu, Q.; et al. Pericytes augment glioblastoma cell resistance to temozolomide through CCL5-CCR5 paracrine signaling. Cell Res. 2021, 31, 1072–1087.
  68. Vitkovic, L.; Maeda, S.; Sternberg, E. Anti-inflammatory cytokines: Expression and action in the brain. Neuroimmunomodulation 2001, 9, 295–312.
  69. Gong, D.; Shi, W.; Yi, S.J.; Chen, H.; Groffen, J.; Heisterkamp, N. TGFβ signaling plays a critical role in promoting alternative macrophage activation. BMC Immunol. 2012, 13, 31.
  70. Long, G.V.; Dummer, R.; Hamid, O.; Gajewski, T.F.; Caglevic, C.; Dalle, S.; Arance, A.; Carlino, M.S.; Grob, J.-J.; Kim, T.M.; et al. Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma (ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252): A phase 3, randomised, double-blind study. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 1083–1097.
  71. Singh, K.; Batich, K.A.; Wen, P.Y.; Tan, A.C.; Bagley, S.J.; Lim, M.; Platten, M.; Colman, H.; Ashley, D.M.; Chang, S.M.; et al. Designing Clinical Trials for Combination Immunotherapy: A Framework for Glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021.
  72. Study of Safety and Tolerability of BCA101 Alone and in Combination with Pembrolizumab in Patients With EGFR-driven Advanced Solid Tumors—Full Text View— Available online: (accessed on 30 December 2020).
  73. Tesselaar, K.; Gravestein, L.A.; van Schijndel, G.M.; Borst, J.; van Lier, R.A. Characterization of murine CD70, the ligand of the TNF receptor family member CD27. J. Immunol. 1997, 159, 4959–4965.
  74. Hintzen, R.Q.; Lens, S.M.; Lammers, K.; Kuiper, H.; Beckmann, M.P.; van Lier, R.A. Engagement of CD27 with its ligand CD70 provides a second signal for T cell activation. J. Immunol. 1995, 154, 2612–2623.
  75. Slaney, C.Y.; Wang, P.; Darcy, P.K.; Kershaw, M.H. CARs versus BiTEs: A Comparison between T Cell-Redirection Strategies for Cancer Treatment. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 924–934.
  76. Hurton, L.V.; Singh, H.; Najjar, A.M.; Switzer, K.C.; Mi, T.; Maiti, S.; Olivares, S.; Rabinovich, B.; Huls, H.; Forget, M.A.; et al. Tethered IL-15 augments antitumor activity and promotes a stem-cell memory subset in tumor-specific T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E7788–E7797.
  77. Avanzi, M.P.; Yeku, O.; Li, X.; Wijewarnasuriya, D.P.; van Leeuwen, D.G.; Cheung, K.; Park, H.; Purdon, T.J.; Daniyan, A.F.; Spitzer, M.H.; et al. Engineered Tumor-Targeted T Cells Mediate Enhanced Anti-Tumor Efficacy Both Directly and through Activation of the Endogenous Immune System. Cell Rep. 2018, 23, 2130–2141.
  78. Haynes, A.B.; Weiser, T.G.; Berry, W.R.; Lipsitz, S.R.; Breizat, A.H.; Dellinger, E.P.; Herbosa, T.; Joseph, S.; Kibatala, P.L.; Lapitan, M.C.; et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 491–499.
  79. Caruana, I.; Savoldo, B.; Hoyos, V.; Weber, G.; Liu, H.; Kim, E.S.; Ittmann, M.M.; Marchetti, D.; Dotti, G. Heparanase promotes tumor infiltration and antitumor activity of CAR-redirected T lymphocytes. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 524–529.
  80. Wang, L.C.; Lo, A.; Scholler, J.; Sun, J.; Majumdar, R.S.; Kapoor, V.; Antzis, M.; Cotner, C.E.; Johnson, L.A.; Durham, A.C.; et al. Targeting fibroblast activation protein in tumor stroma with chimeric antigen receptor T cells can inhibit tumor growth and augment host immunity without severe toxicity. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2014, 2, 154–166.
  81. Salmon, H.; Idoyaga, J.; Rahman, A.; Leboeuf, M.; Remark, R.; Jordan, S.; Casanova-Acebes, M.; Khudoynazarova, M.; Agudo, J.; Tung, N.; et al. Expansion and Activation of CD103(+) Dendritic Cell Progenitors at the Tumor Site Enhances Tumor Responses to Therapeutic PD-L1 and BRAF Inhibition. Immunity 2016, 44, 924–938.
  82. Pellegatta, S.; Poliani, P.L.; Stucchi, E.; Corno, D.; Colombo, C.A.; Orzan, F.; Ravanini, M.; Finocchiaro, G. Intra-tumoral dendritic cells increase efficacy of peripheral vaccination by modulation of glioma microenvironment. Neuro-Oncology 2010, 12, 377–388.
  83. Calzascia, T.; Di Berardino-Besson, W.; Wilmotte, R.; Masson, F.; de Tribolet, N.; Dietrich, P.Y.; Walker, P.R. Cutting edge: Cross-presentation as a mechanism for efficient recruitment of tumor-specific CTL to the brain. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 2187–2191.
  84. Barnard, Z.; Wakimoto, H.; Zaupa, C.; Patel, A.P.; Klehm, J.; Martuza, R.L.; Rabkin, S.D.; Curry, W.T., Jr. Expression of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand by oncolytic herpes simplex virus type I prolongs survival in mice bearing established syngeneic intracranial malignant glioma. Neurosurgery 2012, 71, 741–748.
  85. Wick, A.; Felsberg, J.; Steinbach, J.P.; Herrlinger, U.; Platten, M.; Blaschke, B.; Meyermann, R.; Reifenberger, G.; Weller, M.; Wick, W. Efficacy and tolerability of temozolomide in an alternating weekly regimen in patients with recurrent glioma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007, 25, 3357–3361.
  86. Jordan, J.T.; Sun, W.; Hussain, S.F.; DeAngulo, G.; Prabhu, S.S.; Heimberger, A.B. Preferential migration of regulatory T cells mediated by glioma-secreted chemokines can be blocked with chemotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2008, 57, 123–131.
  87. Heimberger, A.B.; Sun, W.; Hussain, S.F.; Dey, M.; Crutcher, L.; Aldape, K.; Gilbert, M.; Hassenbusch, S.J.; Sawaya, R.; Schmittling, B.; et al. Immunological responses in a patient with glioblastoma multiforme treated with sequential courses of temozolomide and immunotherapy: Case study. Neuro-Oncology 2008, 10, 98–103.
  88. Duan, L.; Zhang, X.D.; Miao, W.Y.; Sun, Y.J.; Xiong, G.; Wu, Q.; Li, G.; Yang, P.; Yu, H.; Li, H.; et al. PDGFRβ Cells Rapidly Relay Inflammatory Signal from the Circulatory System to Neurons via Chemokine CCL2. Neuron 2018, 100, 183–200.e8.
  89. Twyman-Saint Victor, C.; Rech, A.J.; Maity, A.; Rengan, R.; Pauken, K.E.; Stelekati, E.; Benci, J.L.; Xu, B.; Dada, H.; Odorizzi, P.M.; et al. Radiation and dual checkpoint blockade activate non-redundant immune mechanisms in cancer. Nature 2015, 520, 373–377.
Contributor :
View Times: 42
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Time: 04 Nov 2021
Table of Contents


    Are you sure to Delete?

    Video Upload Options

    Do you have a full video?
    If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
    Singh, K. T Cell Chemotaxis and Infiltration in Glioblastoma. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 29 June 2022).
    Singh K. T Cell Chemotaxis and Infiltration in Glioblastoma. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed June 29, 2022.
    Singh, Kirit. "T Cell Chemotaxis and Infiltration in Glioblastoma," Encyclopedia, (accessed June 29, 2022).
    Singh, K. (2021, November 03). T Cell Chemotaxis and Infiltration in Glioblastoma. In Encyclopedia.
    Singh, Kirit. ''T Cell Chemotaxis and Infiltration in Glioblastoma.'' Encyclopedia. Web. 03 November, 2021.