Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 2367 word(s) 2367 2021-08-09 11:54:35

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Zeghbib, S. SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Algeria. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/13292 (accessed on 06 December 2024).
Zeghbib S. SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Algeria. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/13292. Accessed December 06, 2024.
Zeghbib, Safia. "SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Algeria" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/13292 (accessed December 06, 2024).
Zeghbib, S. (2021, August 18). SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Algeria. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/13292
Zeghbib, Safia. "SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Algeria." Encyclopedia. Web. 18 August, 2021.
SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Algeria
Edit

To explore the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Algeria, a dataset comprising ninety-five genomes originating from SARS-CoV-2 sampled from Algeria and other countries worldwide, from 24 December 2019, through 4 March 2021, was thoroughly examined. 

SARS-CoV-2 phylogeny phylogeography haplotype network analysis selection pressure evolution mutations transmission route

1. Introduction

Historically, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) emergence dates back to 2002, and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) epidemic erupted in 2012. In late 2019, the third highly pathogenic human coronavirus was first identified in Wuhan, China, and considered the epicenter cause of a pneumonia outbreak[1]. The novel virus was aptly identified as a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the primary cause of the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) [2]. Owing to globalized travel, it subsequently spread worldwide and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO), and today is considered a major public health concern [3]. Similarly to MERS coronavirus and SARS coronavirus, the SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the betacoronavirus genus and Sarbecovirus subgenus, and is related to SARS coronavirus with roughly 80% identity at the nucleotide level [1]. Moreover, despite different hypotheses regarding animal reservoirs and/or intermediate hosts, or even the lab leak theory, the origin of the pandemic remains blurred [4][5].
In Algeria, 25 February 2020, marked the first imported case and was registered in the southern portion of the country, when an Italian employee tested positive. This incident was well contained, and no additional cases were reported until the beginning of March 2020, as two more cases were recorded following contact with a family member visiting from France. These cases are considered the onset of the first outbreak in Blida, located in Northern Algeria [6]. In the present study, we aim to understand the dynamics associated with the transmission of all the Algerian SARS-CoV-2 sequences and characterize the identified Algerian SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Notably, this is of significant importance regarding disease containment and both vaccine and drug development [7]. Therefore, a dataset representing ninety-five SARS-CoV-2 sequences comprising a total of twenty-nine Algerian sequences deposited and freely available from the GISAID database was analyzed [8]. To effectively manage the sequencing procedure, we employed the Beast v1.10.4 package for evolutionary and phylogeographic investigations and, additionally, implemented POPART software to create a haplotype network analysis to demonstrate multiple introductions, local transmissions and to further understand the spread and evolution of the disease [9][10]. Moreover, various programs were used for further genome exploration. The results emphasized multiple disease introductions to Algeria and highlighted the role of local and international travels in disease propagation. We noted a mutational heterogeneity at the nucleotide and protein levels across the Algerian genomes, highlighting both unique and common mutations. Furthermore, mutation-based tracing could be established; for instance, a relationship to the USA sequences was confirmed by identifying the USA characteristic amino-acid replacement T1004I (nsp3) in Algeria_EPI_ISL_420037. Likewise, disease introduction from Saudi Arabi during the pilgrimage could be determined via the pangolin lineage classification. However, missing unsampled data were observed during the analysis and might reflect undiagnosed infections during both the first and the second waves of the pandemic.

2. Discussion

To investigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Algeria, we performed a thorough analysis of all the complete and partial SARS-CoV-2 sequences available from Algeria (twenty-nine) in addition to sixty-six sequences sampled worldwide.
Our estimations regarding the MRCA of the SARS-CoV-2 Algerian pandemic under a relaxed molecular clock with the skyline model was 28 January 2020 [29 October 2019, 29 February 2020]. These results are coherent, as the restriction measures in Algeria began in mid-March 2020 [6]. The evolutionary rate of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the present study was equal to 5.4043 × 10−4 substitution/site/year as of March 2021. In parallel, the substitution rate previously reported early in the pandemic was 1.66 × 10−3 in February 2020, whereas 8.99 × 10−4 in early August 2020, which is in line with the time-dependent pattern of substitution rates observed in viruses [2][42][43][44].
Moreover, the phylogenetic analysis revealed both multiple disease introductions into Algeria and disease transmissions between cities. Thus, highlighting the impact of international and domestic travels in disease spread. The first three sequenced samples from March 2020 were introduced from France to Algeria as previously demonstrated through contact tracing and phylogenetic analysis, yet; they didn’t cluster together within the current study indicating indirect contamination [6][45]. Likewise, the discrete phylogeographic analysis of the virus expansion in Algeria emphasized between city transmissions, both vertical (from the north to the south and vice versa) and horizontal (within only northern cities, or just southern cities) transmissions were observed. For instance, within the northern part of Algeria from Bouira to Blida (BF 37.19) and Bouira to Tizi Ouzou (BF = 6.01), from the north to the south of the country, Blida to Ain Salah (BF = 5.69,) and from Adrar, a southern city to Boufarik a municipality in the town of Blida in the North of Algeria (BF = 91.69). The continuous phylogeographic analysis gave more details about the route of expansion by reconstructing the ancestral locations of the virus indicated as internal nods. Unsurprisingly, internal nods were placed in municipalities representing crossing points between several cities, such as Djebahia in the city of Bouira, where travelers take breaks. Another example is Hassi Messaoud in Ouargla, where a large oil station employing several international workers is located. The first formally considered coronavirus case in Algeria was detected in an Italian worker from this oil station [6][46]. The phylogeographic results are in accordance with the phylogenetic analysis, emphasizing the importance of local travels and social contact in the spread of the disease. Globally, the ω ratios across all the analyzed coding genes (ORF1a, ORF1b, S, M, N, E, ORF3a) for the Algerian sequences in comparison to the reference genomes were inferior to one indicating negative selection. The same results were observed in a similar study on SARS-CoV-2 in a Canadian population conducted by Zhang et al. [47]. In addition, a recent analysis performed on 260,673 whole-genome sequences to study the selection pressure among the coding genes highlighted the rarity of positive selection in SARS-CoV-2 protein-coding genes [48].
Complementary to this, several common non-synonymous mutations were detected among the Algerian sequences. This included T85I in the nsp2 gene, P423L in the nsp12 gene, D614G in the S gene, and Q57H in the ORF3a gene. Notably, these mutations were detected within eighty-four countries and thus considered as positively selected. Moreover, amino-acid replacements in the Spike protein characteristic of the newly identified SARS-Cov-2 variants were also identified. Namely, the H69del, V70del, E484K, Y144del, and Q52R. This was after the repatriation of Algerian nationals from abroad. Following this, Algeria enforced a full lockdown for the second time [46]. Interestingly, characteristic non-synonymous mutations were identified. To cite an example, the T1004I replacement in the nsp3 gene was detected in the sequence Algeria_EPI_ISL_420037. This mutation was spotted as a unique mutation in the USA in the early stages of the pandemic, in sequences from 19 January 2020 to 15 April 2020 and was not reported elsewhere. We conclude that the individual who contaminated Algeria_EPI_ISL_420037 had either a travel history to the USA or was in contact with an individual who introduced the disease to France originating from the USA [49]. Strikingly, unique non-synonymous amino-acid changes were found. In the sequence, Algeria/EPI_ISL_766874, the amino acid substitution A130V in the RdRp gene result in a harmful functional effect on the protein responsible for viral replication. This mutation was first reported in the United Arab Emirates on 12 June 2020. It occurred only in seventy-five samples worldwide in thirteen countries. In Algeria, it was detected on 21 June 2020, since the sample collection dates in all the other locations where this mutation was described ranged from 20 of August 2020 till 19 April 2021, excluding them from originating countries of the disease and thus linking the sample Algeria/EPI_ISL_766874 directly to the sample EPI_ISL_698151 from Abu Dhabi. Likewise, a deleterious mutation results from the non-synonymous amino acid replacement N874H in Algeria/EPI_ISL_766875 in the NSP12 gene. This amino-acid replacement occurred the first time in Algeria and only in seven samples worldwide. Based on the collection dates, the sequence can be linked directly to the EPI_ISL_557768 genome from England sampled right after the original sequence on 6 July 2020. Similarly, In the accessory gene ORF3a, which plays an important role in virulence, infectivity, and virus release, the deleterious mutation A23T was first reported from the USA and sampled sixty-two times in fifteen countries; thus, based on collection dates, the sequence Algeria/ EPI_ISL_766862 is related to sequences from Texas (USA) [50].The last deleterious amino acid replacement, L129F, was found in the NS3 gene and detected for the first time in Algeria. It occurred in nine hundred ninety-seven samples worldwide. This mutation occurred in the third functional domain of the ORF3a protein (K+ ion channel) and may seriously impact the protein function and consequently the virus phenotype [50]. The circulation of different deleterious mutations is in line with previous reports regarding deleterious mutations in RNA viruses with zoonotic potential. The occurrence of different deleterious mutations simultaneously with the presence of stabilizing mutations may increase virus fitness. This is the case for influenza A/H5N1, which required a combination of mutations to gain airborne transmissibility, of which two were deleterious [51]. However, the strength of the purifying selection is not sufficient to directly eliminate the deleterious mutations after their occurrence; hence they might circulate for a sufficient period to impact the viral infection path [52]. Moreover, deleterious mutations might be used to develop treatment strategies. For instance, provoking a mutational meltdown phenomenon (population extinction) by giving a drug such as Favipiravir, which increases the accumulation rate of harmful mutations, subsequently inducing population collapse [53]. In parallel, three neutral amino acid replacements were identified among the Algerian sequences; this implies no changes in the protein function [54]. The E681D amino acid replacement in the protease gene (NSP3) was first acknowledged in the Algerian genome EPI_ISL_766862 and occurring only in three samples worldwide demonstrated disease exportation from Algeria to Austria (EPI_ISL_853900) via the sample collection dates. Furthermore, in Algeria/EPI_ISL_418241, two neutral amino acid replacements were identified. The first in the exonuclease gene (NSP14), H26Y amino acid substitution originally discovered for the first time in the aforementioned Algerian sequence and right after in the Greek sequence EPI_ISL_437907, subsequently supporting relatedness of the two genomes. In the envelope gene, the Leucine substitution with Phenylalanine in position seventy-three was first revealed from the Algerian sequence, then reported in 2795 samples worldwide. This mutation was proven earlier to alter the DLLV motif (change to DFLV). Distinctly, it may delay Tight Junction formation and therefore may hypothetically affect viral replication and/or infectivity [55]. The above-mentioned viral mutation fingerprints might help characterize and identify both transmission patterns and superspreaders, as previously demonstrated [56].
Meanwhile, the Algerian genomes fell within five lineages, the lineage A being considered as the root of the pandemic in which many sequences originated from China. All Algerian sequences within this lineage were partial genomes (S, NSP16) and were characterized with either the B.1.1.7 (UK), B.1.351 (South Africa), or B.1.525 (Nigeria) related mutations. The length of the sequence is one of the biggest drawbacks of an accurate analysis [55]. Furthermore, lineage B.1, a large European clade corresponding approximately to the Italian outbreak, and the clade B.1.1 corresponding to a European lineage with three clear SNPs: G28881A, G28882A, G28883C were also identified amid the Algerian sequences. Similarly, the clade B.1.597 corresponding to sequences Mainly from France was determined. Interestingly, one of the Algeria sequences appertained to the B.1.36 lineage declared for the first time in February 2020 in Saudi Arabia and clustered with both an Indian (PP = 94%) and a Malaysian sequence (PP = 92%). This sequence was isolated from an eighty-two-year-old woman. Undoubtedly, the virus was imported from Saudi Arabia while performing the pilgrimage as no repatriation flights were scheduled in the destination of Malesia and India, unlike Saudi Arabia. These results are in line with reports regarding Algerian repatriation from abroad [46].
Furthermore, as per the results mentioned above, the haplotype network analysis displayed seven median vectors amid the Algerian sequences indicating missing or unsampled data. The multiple introduction theory was clearly visible in the network, confirmed by the heterogeneity of the Algerian haplotypes.
In the present study, we demonstrated the evolution representing the Algerian pandemic in a consistent manner, while simultaneously reflecting the effectiveness of various implemented measures. Moreover, the strong correlation between the number of SARS-CoV-2 confirmed cases and the population density in each Algerian city implies the spread of the virus is primarily dependent on social contact, the awareness of the community, and the respectful compliance regarding social distancing, seeing as how lower infection cases in relatively high population density cities were observed and vice-versa. To cite an illustration, Ouargla, a city located in the southern portion of Algeria, has a population density of 2.63 habitant/km2, although the number of confirmed cases is two thousand four hundred fifty-three. Whereases, in Bordj Bou Arreridj, situated in the Northern area of Algeria, the number of confirmed cases is five hundred six cases for 182.76 habitant/km2. Overall, the Algerian government’s restriction measures were effective regarding disease containment and prevented catastrophic scenarios such as the Italian one [57]. This is complementary to an epidemiological study conducted to assess the mitigation measures implemented in Algeria in the early SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (dated 26 April 2020), which demonstrated the efficiency based on the basic reproduction number R0 before and after the implementation of the preventive strategy [6].
Overall, we explored the evolutionary, genetic, and epidemiological aspects regarding the Algerian SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, aptly demonstrating the multiple introductions of the disease and the heterogeneity of the genomes. Additionally, our research findings revealed unique amino-acid substitutions by characterizing the mutational patterns and the effect on the corresponding proteins. In addition, some concise tracing could be performed based on both unique mutations and travel history. Statistically, we assessed the effectiveness regarding the mitigation majors implemented against the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Admittedly, the main drawback regarding our study was the length of some sequenced genomes and the size of the Algerian data panel. Thus, we emphasized the importance of massive sampling and sequencing in disease comprehension and increased efforts regarding diagnostics, therapy, drug, and vaccine development. Given that Algeria was under complete travel restrictions since 15 March 2020, the number of cases kept increasing, indicating local transmissions. Thus, these local viral variants may potentially represent a distinct strain as previously occurred [9].

References

  1. Wu, F.; Zhao, S.; Yu, B.; Chen, Y.-M.; Wang, W.; Song, Z.-G.; Hu, Y.; Tao, Z.-W.; Tian, J.-H.; Pei, Y.-Y.; et al. A New Coronavirus Associated with Human Respiratory Disease in China. Nature 2020, 579, 265–269.
  2. Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses The Species Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus: Classifying 2019-NCoV and Naming It SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 536–544.
  3. COVID-19 Situation Reports. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports (accessed on 12 May 2020).
  4. Sharun, K.; Dhama, K.; Pawde, A.M.; Gortázar, C.; Tiwari, R.; Bonilla-Aldana, D.K.; Rodriguez-Morales, A.J.; de la Fuente, J.; Michalak, I.; Attia, Y.A. SARS-CoV-2 in Animals: Potential for Unknown Reservoir Hosts and Public Health Implications. Vet. Q. 2021, 41, 181–201.
  5. The COVID Lab-Leak Hypothesis: What Scientists Do and Don’t Know. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01529-3 (accessed on 29 June 2021).
  6. Hamidouche, M. COVID-19 Epidemic in Algeria: Assessment of the Implemented Preventive Strategy. medRxiv 2020.
  7. Kames, J.; Holcomb, D.D.; Kimchi, O.; DiCuccio, M.; Hamasaki-Katagiri, N.; Wang, T.; Komar, A.A.; Alexaki, A.; Kimchi-Sarfaty, C. Sequence Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Genome Reveals Features Important for Vaccine Design. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15643.
  8. Shu, Y.; McCauley, J. GISAID: Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data—From Vision to Reality. Eurosurveillance 2017, 22, 30494.
  9. Drummond, A.J.; Rambaut, A. BEAST: Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis by Sampling Trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7, 214.
  10. Leigh, J.W.; Bryant, D. Popart: Full-Feature Software for Haplotype Network Construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015, 6, 1110–1116.
  11. Elbe, S.; Buckland-Merrett, G. Data, Disease and Diplomacy: GISAID’s Innovative Contribution to Global Health. Glob. Chall. 2017, 1, 33–46.
  12. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549.
  13. Katoh, K.; Misawa, K.; Kuma, K.; Miyata, T. MAFFT: A Novel Method for Rapid Multiple Sequence Alignment Based on Fast Fourier Transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066.
  14. Nguyen, L.-T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274.
  15. Hoang, D.T.; Chernomor, O.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q.; Vinh, L.S. UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 518–522.
  16. Rambaut, A.; Lam, T.T.; Max Carvalho, L.; Pybus, O.G. Exploring the Temporal Structure of Heterochronous Sequences Using TempEst (Formerly Path-O-Gen). Virus Evol. 2016, 2.
  17. Suchard, M.A.; Lemey, P.; Baele, G.; Ayres, D.L.; Drummond, A.J.; Rambaut, A. Bayesian Phylogenetic and Phylodynamic Data Integration Using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evol. 2018, 4.
  18. Drummond, A.J.; Ho, S.Y.W.; Phillips, M.J.; Rambaut, A. Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4, e88.
  19. Drummond, A.J. Bayesian Coalescent Inference of Past Population Dynamics from Molecular Sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22, 1185–1192.
  20. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A.J.; Xie, D.; Baele, G.; Suchard, M.A. Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 2018, 67, 901–904.
  21. Lemey, P.; Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A.J.; Suchard, M.A. Bayesian Phylogeography Finds Its Roots. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5, e1000520.
  22. Bielejec, F.; Rambaut, A.; Suchard, M.A.; Lemey, P. SPREAD: Spatial Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Evolutionary Dynamics. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2910–2912.
  23. Simple Methods for Estimating the Numbers of Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Nucleotide Substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1986.
  24. Yang, Z.; Bielawski, J.P. Statistical Methods for Detecting Molecular Adaptation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15, 496–503.
  25. Bromberg, Y.; Rost, B. SNAP: Predict Effect of Non-Synonymous Polymorphisms on Function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 3823–3835.
  26. Cleemput, S.; Dumon, W.; Fonseca, V.; Abdool Karim, W.; Giovanetti, M.; Alcantara, L.C.; Deforche, K.; de Oliveira, T. Genome Detective Coronavirus Typing Tool for Rapid Identification and Characterization of Novel Coronavirus Genomes. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 3552–3555.
  27. Singer, J.; Gifford, R.; Cotten, M.; Robertson, D. CoV-GLUE: A Web Application for Tracking SARS-CoV-2 Genomic Variation. Preprints 2020.
  28. Hanada, K.; Gojobori, T.; Li, W.-H. Radical Amino Acid Change versus Positive Selection in the Evolution of Viral Envelope Proteins. Gene 2006, 385, 83–88.
  29. Grantham, R. Amino Acid Difference Formula to Help Explain Protein Evolution. Science 1974, 185, 862–864.
  30. Miyata, T.; Miyazawa, S.; Yasunaga, T. Two Types of Amino Acid Substitutions in Protein Evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 1979, 12, 219–236.
  31. Capriotti, E.; Fariselli, P. PhD-SNPg: A Webserver and Lightweight Tool for Scoring Single Nucleotide Variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W247–W252.
  32. Adzhubei, I.; Jordan, D.M.; Sunyaev, S.R. Predicting Functional Effect of Human Missense Mutations Using PolyPhen-2. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet 2013, 76, 7–20.
  33. Ng, P.C.; Henikoff, S. SIFT: Predicting Amino Acid Changes That Affect Protein Function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3812–3814.
  34. PredictSNP: Robust and Accurate Consensus Classifier for Prediction of Disease-Related Mutations. Available online: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003440 (accessed on 21 June 2021).
  35. Rozas, J.; Ferrer-Mata, A.; Sánchez-DelBarrio, J.C.; Guirao-Rico, S.; Librado, P.; Ramos-Onsins, S.E.; Sánchez-Gracia, A. DnaSP 6: DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis of Large Data Sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 3299–3302.
  36. Martin, D.P.; Murrell, B.; Golden, M.; Khoosal, A.; Muhire, B. RDP4: Detection and Analysis of Recombination Patterns in Virus Genomes. Virus Evol. 2015, 1.
  37. Bandelt, H.J.; Forster, P.; Rohl, A. Median-Joining Networks for Inferring Intraspecific Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 37–48.
  38. An Interactive Web-Based Dashboard to Track COVID-19 in Real Time|Elsevier Enhanced Reader. Available online: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1473309920301201?token=376C61D71B1CC278C07B9C6C5D58FE8583E9CD7429F5971C8D3EA12FB3903A4D7DA908608F00013BBB0DEF3202E2EC6F (accessed on 17 August 2020).
  39. Algerian Ministry of Health. Available online: http://covid19.sante.gov.dz/carte/ (accessed on 15 May 2021).
  40. Démographie en Algérie. Available online: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Démographie_de_l’Algérie (accessed on 3 May 2021).
  41. Rambaut, A.; Holmes, E.C.; Hill, V.; O’Toole, Á.; McCrone, J.; Ruis, C.; du Plessis, L.; Pybus, O.G. A Dynamic Nomenclature Proposal for SARS-CoV-2 to Assist Genomic Epidemiology. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 1403–1407.
  42. Li, X.; Wang, W.; Zhao, X.; Zai, J.; Zhao, Q.; Li, Y.; Chaillon, A. Transmission Dynamics and Evolutionary History of 2019-NCoV. J. Med Virol. 2020, 92, 501–511.
  43. Time Dependence of SARS-CoV-2 Substitution Rates—SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus/NCoV-2019 Evolutionary History. Available online: https://virological.org/t/time-dependence-of-sars-cov-2-substitution-rates/542 (accessed on 17 June 2021).
  44. Ghafari, M.; Simmonds, P.; Pybus, O.G.; Katzourakis, A. Prisoner of War Dynamics Explains the Time-Dependent Pattern of Substitution Rates in Viruses. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gámbaro, F.; Behillil, S.; Baidaliuk, A.; Donati, F.; Albert, M.; Alexandru, A.; Vanpeene, M.; Bizard, M.; Brisebarre, A.; Barbet, M.; et al. Introductions and Early Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in France. Eurosurveillance 2020, 25, 2001200.
  46. Pandémie de Covid-19 en Algérie. Available online: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandémie_de_Covid-19_en_Algérie (accessed on 26 June 2021).
  47. Zhang, M.; Li, L.; Luo, M.; Liang, B. Genomic Characterization and Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 of a Canadian Population. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247799.
  48. Miao, M.; Clercq, E.D.; Li, G. Genetic Diversity of SARS-CoV-2 over a One-Year Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Global Perspective. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 412.
  49. Kaushal, N.; Gupta, Y.; Goyal, M.; Khaiboullina, S.F.; Baranwal, M.; Verma, S.C. Mutational Frequencies of SARS-CoV-2 Genome during the Beginning Months of the Outbreak in USA. Pathogens 2020, 9, 565.
  50. Issa, E.; Merhi, G.; Panossian, B.; Salloum, T.; Tokajian, S. SARS-CoV-2 and ORF3a: Nonsynonymous Mutations, Functional Domains, and Viral Pathogenesis. mSystems 2020, 5.
  51. Fonville, J.M. Expected Effect of Deleterious Mutations on Within-Host Adaptation of Pathogens. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 9242–9251.
  52. Koelle, K.; Rasmussen, D.A. The Effects of a Deleterious Mutation Load on Patterns of Influenza A/H3N2′s Antigenic Evolution in Humans. eLife 2015, 4, e07361.
  53. Jensen, J.D.; Lynch, M. Considering Mutational Meltdown as a Potential SARS-CoV-2 Treatment Strategy. Heredity 2020, 124, 619–620.
  54. Das, J.K.; Sengupta, A.; Choudhury, P.P.; Roy, S. Characterizing Genomic Variants and Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Proteins from Indian Isolates. Gene Rep. 2021, 101044.
  55. CDC Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant-info.html (accessed on 22 June 2021).
  56. Lau, B.T.; Pavlichin, D.; Hooker, A.C.; Almeda, A.; Shin, G.; Chen, J.; Sahoo, M.K.; Huang, C.H.; Pinsky, B.A.; Lee, H.J.; et al. Profiling SARS-CoV-2 Mutation Fingerprints That Range from the Viral Pangenome to Individual Infection Quasispecies. Genome Med. 2021, 13, 62.
  57. Megna, R. First Month of the Epidemic Caused by COVID-19 in Italy: Current Status and Real-Time Outbreak Development Forecast. Glob. Health Res. Policy 2020, 5, 43.
More
Information
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 534
Entry Collection: COVID-19
Revision: 1 time (View History)
Update Date: 24 Nov 2021
1000/1000
ScholarVision Creations