Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 4607 word(s) 4607 2021-06-16 04:15:43 |
2 format correct -21 word(s) 4586 2021-06-29 10:58:06 | |
3 format correct Meta information modification 4586 2021-06-30 10:37:20 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Chiba, S. Power Generation Using Dielectric Elastomers. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 15 June 2024).
Chiba S. Power Generation Using Dielectric Elastomers. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed June 15, 2024.
Chiba, Seiki. "Power Generation Using Dielectric Elastomers" Encyclopedia, (accessed June 15, 2024).
Chiba, S. (2021, June 29). Power Generation Using Dielectric Elastomers. In Encyclopedia.
Chiba, Seiki. "Power Generation Using Dielectric Elastomers." Encyclopedia. Web. 29 June, 2021.
Power Generation Using Dielectric Elastomers

Power generation using dielectric elastomer (DE) artificial muscle is attracting attention because of its light weight, low cost, and high-efficiency. Since this method is a system that produces electricity without emitting carbon dioxide nor using rare earths, it would contribute to the goal of environmental sustainability. 

dielectric elastomer generation carbon dioxide free rare earths free high efficiency CNT high power artificial muscle actuator large deformation

1. Introduction

Most commercial power generation systems use electromagnetic induction in which the generator is rotated by mechanical energy. Electricity is, for example, generated by a turbine (utilization of mechanical energy) driven by wind, water falling from a high place, or a flow from a stream. Small-scale power generation using renewable energy is currently becoming widely used due to problems such as environmental pollution, including issues related to global warming and population explosion [1][2][3]. However, traditional generators that use electromagnetic induction tend to operate most efficiently at high frequencies in a narrow range, which may make them unsuitable for renewable energy sources [4]. Sources for utilizing renewable energy generate motion over a wide range of low frequencies, so power generation systems that use electromagnetic induction must include mechanical or hydraulic transmissions, making the system more complex. Consequently, it will be expensive.
A DE (dielectric elastomer) is one of the most promising artificial muscles and is also a new transducer technology that can convert mechanical energy into electrical energy. Compared to conventional generators that use electromagnetic induction or piezoelectric effects, generators that use DEs have been found to generate electricity more efficiently, with higher energy densities, and at lower frequencies [5][6][7].

2. Background of Dielectric Elastomers

A DE is a transducer technology invented by Pelrine and Chiba at SRI International (Stanford Research Institute USA) in early 1991 [8]. As shown in Figure 1, the basic element of a DE is a very simple structure consisting of a thin polymer film (elastomer) sandwiched between two electrodes. When a voltage difference is applied between the electrodes, the electrodes are attracted to each other by electrostatic force (Coulomb force), and the elastomer contracts in the thickness direction and expands in the plane direction.
Figure 1. Basic operational principle of dielectric elastomers (DEs).
A DE can achieve a very efficient conversion of electrical energy to mechanical energy [9]. The energy density of a DE reaches 3.4 J/g, which is about 21 times that of single crystal piezoelectric elements and more than two orders of magnitude higher than most commercially available actuators [9][10]. As shown in Figure 2, a 0.15 g DE can lift an 8 kg weight by 1 mm or more at a speed of 88 mc with our latest design [11]. However, the edge of the DE was reinforced so that it would not be destroyed by repeated loads, and the total weight was set to 0.97 g. Also, for deformation, as shown in Figure 3, it has reached 680% so far [12]. The polymer used for them was acrylic #a (see Table 1), and the electrode material was a single-walled nanotube (ZEONANO®-SG101, Zeon corp., Tokyo, Japan.
Figure 2. DE actuator (DEA) with a weight of 8 kg.
Figure 3. Expanding circular actuator up to 680%.
Table 1. Maximum response of representative elastomers.
(Specific Type)
Elastic Energy Density
Strain (%) Young’s Modulus (MPa) Breakdown Electric Field
Dielectric Constant
(at 1 kHz)
Coupling Efficiency, k2 (%)
Acrylic #a 3.4 7.2 158 2.0 412 4.8 85
Silicone #a 0.22 1.36 102 1.0 235 2.8 54
Polyurethane #a 0.087 1.6 60 17.0 160 7.0 21
Silicone #c 0.082 0.51 32 0.7 144 2.8 54
Fluorosilicone #1 0.055 0.39 28 0.5 80 6.9 48
Silicone #b 0.026 0.13 41 0.125 72 2.8 65
Isoprene Natural Rubber #a 0.0059 0.11 11 0.85 67 2.7 21
Fluoroelastomer #a 0.0046 0.11 8 2.5 32 12.7 15
It has been observed that when the above operation is reversed, power is generated, for example, when the DE is pulled by an external force or when pressure is applied by an external force [10].
Currently, there are two approaches: (1) DE materials and mechanical systems using DEs [6][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], and (2) operational strategies (circuit design) [36][37][38][39] that are being studied.
The following are relevant papers on DE materials and mechanical systems using DEs:
Chiba et al. made DEs from silicon and acrylic, and discovered that acrylic has greater elongation and actuation pressure [6]. Chiba et al. have also shown the effectiveness of carbon nanotubes as an electrode for DEs [11]. Koh et al. showed that various models of failure, including electrical breakdown, electromechanical instability, loss of tension, and rupture by stretching defined a cycle of maximal energy of conversion [13]. Jean-Mistral et al. presented a DEG that could obtain very small amounts of energy from human motion [15]. Huang et al. claimed that they achieved significant improvements in energy density and power density using equi-biaxial stretching [21]. Vertechy et al. showed a reduced, dynamic model for an inflated circular diaphragm dielectric elastomer generators that features one kinematic degree of freedom and which accounts for DE visco-elasticity [24]. The performance of a DEG composed of an annular membrane deformed out-of-plane by an external oscillating loading was investigated employing a hyper-electro-elastic model with parameters adjusted to simulate the behavior of material such as an acrylic elastomer and a type of natural rubber [25]. Moretti et al. investigated parallelogram-shaped dielectric elastomers and they claimed that those were effectively employed as both rotary and linear transducers [26].

3. Dielectric Elastomer Generators (DEGs)

As mentioned above, the operating principle in generator mode is the conversion of mechanical energy to electrical energy by the deformation of a DE. Functionally, this mode resembles piezoelectricity, but its power generation mechanism is fundamentally different. With DEs, electric power can be generated even by a slow change in the shape of the DE [10], while for piezoelectric devices impulsive mechanical forces are needed to generate the electric power [5][7][10]. Also, the amount of electrical energy generated and the conversion efficiency from mechanical to electrical energy can be greater than that from piezoelectricity [5][7][10][30][39]. Figure 4 shows the operating principal of DE power generation.
Figure 4. DE power generation principle: (a) the DE elastomer film is being stretched by hand; (b) when the hand pulling force is loosened, the film will return to its original length.
Figure 5 shows a schematic diagram of the power generation cycle. The power generation phenomenon of a DE is considered to occur through the following four steps [10]:
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the power generation cycle.
When mechanical energy is applied to the DE film and the film is stretched, the thickness of the film decreases and the surface area increases at the same time;
At this time, a voltage is applied to the film. The added electrical energy is stored in the membrane as an electric charge;
When the mechanical energy of the membrane decreases, the elastic resilience of the membrane acts to restore the original thickness and reduce the area. At this time, the electric charge is pushed out toward the electrode. This change in the position of the charge increases the voltage difference and results in an increase in electrostatic energy;
The charge is removed from the membrane and the membrane returns to its original length.
In each expansion and contraction cycle shown above, the energy E produced by the DE is associated with the change in the capacitance of the DE, and that energy E can be expressed by the following equation [10]:
Here, C1 and C2 are the DE capacitances in the expanded and contracted states, respectively, and Vb2 is the bias voltage. This power generation theory was proved by Chiba et al. in a power generation experiment using a two-dimensional tank in 2013 [35]. Considering the change in voltage, the charge Q of the DE can be regarded as constant in a basic short circuit. Also, since V = Q/C, if the contraction voltage is V2 and the expansion voltage is V1, it can be expressed as follows:
Based on the above energy theory, the contraction voltage is higher than the extension voltage because C2 < C1. That is, power generation occurs. Where the capacitance C of the DE film can be expressed as:
ε0 is the permittivity of free space, ε is the permittivity of the dielectric elastomer film, A is the moving area of the elastomer film, t is the thickness, and b is the volume of the film. In Equation (3), the volume of the elastomer basically does not change, so A/t = b = is constant.
The power (E) actually obtained by a DEG can be calculated by the following procedure using each of the above equations above.
The voltage (V2) between the electrodes on both sides of the DEG in the contracted state can be measured for each wave frequency using a digital oscilloscope (see Figure 6).
Figure 6. Measurement circuit of the voltage of a dielectric elastomer generator (DEG) in a contracted state.
The capacitance (C2) of the transducer in the contracted state is measured with a digital multimeter (see Figure 7).
Figure 7. Measurement circuit of the capacitance of a DEG in a contracted state.
Using the values of Equations (1) and (2), and C2 and V2, the amount of power generation is calculated as follows:
The relationship C1 = V2C2/V1 is derived from Equation (1).
Next, by introducing C1 into Equation (2), the generated electric power can be obtained:
Using Equation (4) and the values of C2 and V2, the power generated at the frequency of each wave of the transducer can be calculated
It should be noted here that if the amount of power generation is not calculated according to the above procedure, the energy applied at the initial stage will be included in the calculation, resulting in an erroneous result [31]. There have been several cases of papers calculating the power generation not following the correct procedure recently, but it is not possible to determine the correct amount of power generation unless the added energy and the generated energy are clearly separated.
Figure 8 summarizes the sites where the DEGs can be installed and shows each conceptual diagram of the generation systems [40]. They are (a) wind power generators on the roofs of buildings, (b) water mill generators, (c) waste energy generators, (d) drain generators, (e) road power generation system using a DE sheet, (f) wind power generators, (g) solar heat generators, (h) wave generators near the shore, (i) water flow generators, (j) wave generators in the ocean, (k) hydrogen production plant, (l) a tanker carrying hydrogen, and (m) road power generation.
Figure 8. A conceptual diagram of various power generation systems using DEGs.
Except for (k) and (l), they are specifically power generation limited to local consumption. In order to achieve zero carbon dioxide emissions in 2050 [3], large-scale offshore wave power generation (k) is indispensable, and the best scenario is to convert the power obtained there into hydrogen and transport it to land [41].

3.1. Buoy Power Generation Loaded with Dielectric Elastomer Generator

A DE buoy generator has been developed and was tested for the first time in the world in a tank 1.4 m wide, 1.7 m high (water depth 0.5 m) and 20 m long [9]. Figure 9 shows this DE wave power generation system. This generator showed exciting potential. Using only an about 40 g DE, we generated more than 5 J/stroke at 0.3 Hz. Light-emitting diode (LED) lights for navigation buoys were able to be flashed continuously, using the electricity generated. The DE polymer used in the experiment was acrylic #a (see Table 1), and the electrode was made in carbon black as shown in Table 2 of Section 4.2. “Electrode Material used for Dielectric Elastomers”.
Figure 9. The world’s first DE wave power generation system: (a) The beat plate was moved by waves, the movement was transmitted to the sheet-type DE installed on the side of the tank, and the force was used to expand and contract the DE to generate electricity; (b) The photo on the right is a beat-type floating body.
The world’s first buoy power generation experiment using waves in the real sea was conducted in August 2007 in Tampa Bay, Florida, USA [10]. Figure 10 shows a buoy power generator system equipped with DEGs. The DE used in this experiment weighed 150 g [9]. The material of the film used was acrylic #a (see Table 1). The electrode was made in carbon black as shown in Table 2.
Figure 10. Buoy power generator system equipped with DEGs: (a) Name of each part of the wave generator buoy; (b) A photo of a generator buoy that actually floated in the sea.
The maximum measured electrical output capacity, verified in laboratory tests, was 12J per generator stroke. Unfortunately, the wave height in that area during the experiment was only a few centimeters, and it was very difficult to test the wave power generator. Therefore, there was no choice but to use a motor boat to generate waves with a height of 10 cm. At a bias voltage of 2000 V, a peak energy of 3.6 J at a wave height of 10 cm was able to be generated. In this system, a 62 kg weight was attached to the bottom of the buoy, the weight was raised and lowered by the movement of the waves, and the force was used to expand and contract the DE to generate electricity. However, due to its heavy inertia, small waves did not generate much power. In December 2008, another ocean test was conducted in California, USA, confirming that the generated electrical energy was always stored in the battery [42].
Based on the above results, a method to fix the buoy to the seabed with a mooring wire was developed, so that even small waves could generate electricity. In other words, the DEG was tied to a mooring rope and the other end of the rope was fixed to the seabed, so when a wave hits the buoy, the buoy moved upward on the wave. However, since the DEG was fixed with a rope, the DEG was deformed and power was generated. In 2010, an actual sea trial was conducted along the coast of the Izu Peninsula in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan using this fixed type [42][43]. The shape of the DEG used in this experiment was a drape type (diameter 260 mm, height 120 mm, weight 4.6 g), the electrode material was carbon black (see Table 2), and the elastomer was acrylic #a (see Table 1). A schematic diagram of the DEG is shown in Figure 11.
Figure 11. Drape type DE generator: The amount of the DE used is 4.6 g: (a) Relaxed states; (b) Stretched state.
The purpose of this experiment was achieved brilliantly by demonstrating that even a small wave equivalent to a wave of several centimeters can generate electricity. However, the system did not have a built-in structure to maintain constant tension as the tide level changed.
To solve the problem above, the power generation system developed in the summer of 2011 was moored on an underwater horizontal plate with some degree of redundancy to accommodate changing tide levels (see Figure 12) [31][42]. This principle focused on the difference in buoyancy between the buoy and the plate. That is, when a wave hits the buoy and the plate, the buoyancy of the buoy is lighter, so the buoy starts to move vertically first and, as a result, the distance between the buoy and the plate becomes longer. Thus, the DEG is deformed, and power generation occurs. By adopting this mooring method, it would be possible to automatically generate electricity for a long time regardless of changes in the tide level. As a result, even if it is deep, it no longer needs to be fixed to the seabed. Even in deep water, power can be generated by mooring it on floating bodies such as super-large ships and super-mega floats floating in the ocean (see Figure 13) [31]. Considering practical applications, cost reduction and the pursuit of convenience are indispensable, and miniaturization of the power generation system is also an important issue. In this wave power generation system, the power generation control circuit can be miniaturized and integrated with the DE power generation unit to eliminate the storage space provided under the buoy. As a result, the size and weight have been reduced by about one-third (see Figure 14).
Figure 12. Buoy power generation system with plate.
Figure 13. Image diagram of the power generation system installed in the ocean: (300 MW/H can be obtained with a system with a width of 40 m and a length of 600 m). One could arrange a large number of these to make a super megawatt power generation system.
Figure 14. Wave generator with miniaturized circuit, etc.: (a) The generator buoy actually floating in the sea; (b) Name of each part of the buoy.
In the above experiment, not only vertical movement due to DE waves but also horizontal movement due to tidal currents were observed [20]. There were two reasons; (1) it was connected to a longer mooring wire and (2) because the buoy was moved horizontally by the waves. As a result, the mooring wire was tensioned, and the DEG was deformed. Figure 15 shows the movement of the buoy in response to the waves. By combining these two movements well, it is thought that power can be generated more efficiently.
Figure 15. Motion of the body influenced by waves: (a) vertical motion of the buoy; (b) horizontal motion of the buoy.

3.2. Usefulness of Dielectric Elastomer Wave Power Generation

Whereas traditional wave generators tend to differ slightly from the optimal natural cycle and significantly reduce power generation efficiency, DE-based generators produce stable power from the short to long term. In 2013, we conducted a basic experiment using a two-dimensional wave power tank and demonstrated for the first time in the world that DEG is an innovative wave power generation system capable of generating power over a wide range of frequencies [35]. A wave tank with a length of 30 m, width of 0.6 m and a depth of 1.5 m was used, as shown in Figure 16. The water depth was 0.6 m. The film used for the DE was acrylic #a (see Table 1). The electrode was made from carbon black as shown in Table 2. The floating body used for the experiment was made of urethane foam with a size of 59 cm × 30 cm × 10 cm. This experiment showed that a DE generator can stably output about 70% of electrical energy on average from short to long cycles (see Figure 17) [35]. This value is the power generated from the DE divided by the wave divided by the maximum output value measured in the laboratory multiplied by 100.
Figure 16. Experimental set-up: The DEG was set between a mooring rope and the floating body. Details of the generator unit are shown schematically at the left while the photos at the right show the overall system set-up. The DE material was acrylic #a: (a) DEG unit; (b) Buoy with the DEG; (c) Wave-making tank and measurement system.
Figure 17. Generated energy as a function of wave period.
Anomalies occurred at the wave periods of 1.2 to 1.4 Hz. This was because the waves in the water tank passed through the floating body with the DE attached, hit the wall of the water tank on the opposite side, and bounced off, generating interference waves to generate electricity. It seems that the value temporarily increased or decreased.
Moretti [19][26][27], Vertechy [24] et al. also experimented with incorporating DEGs into an oscillating water column wave energy converter, demonstrating the importance of DE power generation.

3.2.1. Buoy–Buoy Interaction

In order to build a super megawatt power generation system using buoys, it is necessary to arrange many buoys as shown in Figure 13. Therefore, we need to know what happens in the interaction between buoys. First, in a two-dimensional water tank, three-buoys were lined up in a row in the same direction as the waves traveled, and tested to observe how the waves interfered with them (see Figure 18) [44]. The test tank used for the experiment had a total length of 15 m, a width of 1 m, and a water depth of 1.4 m, and the experimental float was moored near the center. A rectangular parallelepiped urethane (990 mm × 250 mm × 80 mm) was used as a floating body, which was fitted with points for observing movement. The floating motion was measured by tracking the points with a CCD camera and measuring the amount of movement. The floating body moves with three degrees of freedom in heave, surge and pitch by guides set at the four corners for restricting the motion. The mooring wire is connected to the ring gauge via a pulley installed below the floating body, making it possible to measure the tension acting on the mooring wire. In addition, a wave height meter (needle-type servo wave height meter) was installed between the floating body, the wave generator, and the wave-dissipating plate to measure the height of the waves entering the floating body and the waves passing through the floating body.
Figure 18. A test system to investigate how the waves interfere with each of the three buoys.
In the range where the wave period is smaller than about 0.6 s, most of the wave is deflected by the collision with the first floating body. As a result, it does not reach the floating body behind it and the influence on the multiple floating bodies becomes very small. When the wave period is around 0.8 s, the influence of multiple floating bodies becomes large, and an increase in surge and pitch, and a decrease in mooring tension are particularly noticeable with the floating body which first collides with the wave. At that time, although the influence of the spacing of the floating bodies at different intervals is small, the influence becomes large as the number of floating bodies increases. For a wave period of around 1.0 s, it was revealed that if the interval of the floating bodies is narrow, the surge and the pitch of the floating body which first collides with the wave increases. Therefore, if the interval is wide, it would increase the mooring tension.
The above experimental data were numerically modeled, simulated and compared with the physical wave tank test [45]. The conditions analyzed are a single body A, double bodies (A and B) at different intervals, and a case with triple bodies (A, B and C). It was assumed that the bodies were arranged in the order of A, B and C. Results found in this simulation are summarized below:
The calculated motion (surge, heave, pitch), mooring tension, and power generation efficiency were in good agreement with the experimental measurements.
In the case where double bodies are placed next to each other: when the wave frequency is high, the associated response amplitude operators (RAO) of surge, heave, and tension are small, but the RAO of pitch motion is large. That is, the RAO of body B is smaller than the RAO of body A, and it can be seen that the movement and mooring tension of body B are weakened by the presence of the body A. Due to the presence of the body, the wave is diffracted and a part of the wave energy is converted to electrical energy using the power-take-off system.
The efficiency of floating body A reduces at the low wave frequencies, but increases at high wave frequencies when the interval is increased from 0.5 m to 1 m from the case above. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the efficiency of floating body B. It seems that the effects of the diffracted waves from body B on body A are more pronounced than the other way around. Apart from the reason that the floating body A with a DE extracts some of the wave energy, the results might show differences within the results of a 3D experimental work or high-fidelity simulations.
The power generation efficiency was calculated for the wave frequency in the case where the triple bodies were arranged side by side. In general, the power generation efficiency of the first body (A) that encounters the incident waves first is largest; the associated efficiency of the second body (B) is somewhat less than that of the first body, and so on. This can also be interpreted as the DE attached to the floating body absorbing part of the wave energy. In a particular wave frequency range, all wave energy converters (OWSs) can reach relatively high efficiencies; about 0.9 Hz for this studied case. The reason for this is that lower wave frequencies naturally reduce buoy-to-buoy interaction.

3.2.2. System That Incorporates a Dielectric Elastomer into Oscillating Water Column Wave Energy Converter Buoys Is Arranged

OWCs are one of the most promising wave energy transducers [46]. The efficiency of an OWC device peaks at the resonated wave period [46]. However, the efficiency decreases significantly at other wave periods. There are two possible ways to increase the power generation efficiency of the OWS:
By arranging the DEG around the OWC, it is possible to handle waves with a period that OWSs are not good at. This is because, as discussed above, the wave period in which the DEGs can generate is very wide.
A DEG is placed in place of the compressor and electromagnetic motor used in the OWC, and the air compressed by the waves deforms the DE to generate electricity: using this idea, some testing has been done by incorporating DEGs into OWCs [24][27][32].
Idea 2 above has promise, but there might be some problem with the DE used. From Equations (1) and (3) discussed above, the points are the thickness of the DE and the magnitude of the voltage applied to it. Looking at the experimental cases, the voltage applied is too small, around 1000 V, even though the film thickness is rather thick. Therefore, even if a low voltage is applied while the film is not sufficiently deformed, power generation might be unlikely to occur.
In order to realize super mega power generation using larger waves, a power generation system with many buoy-type OWCs was proposed [31]. This method does not use a copper or electromagnetic motor, which is expensive. In addition, due to the high generation efficiency, the power generation cost is expected to be around 5 US cents/kW [41]. This is almost the same as thermal power generation using heavy oil or coal. Currently, as the first step to realize such large-scale offshore power generation, we are simulating a case of 3 vertical × 3 horizontal.

3.2.3. Production of Hydrogen

How to bring the electricity generated at sea to one’s country is a big problem. In our method, the generated electricity is electrolyzed using seawater to make hydrogen. A hydrogen generator was placed beside the above buoy power generation system, and hydrogen was produced using the power generated by the DEG [41]. Hydrogen can be a convenient medium, but the problem is its production cost. However, in wave power it’s free. Figure 19 shows the hydrogen generation equipment using electrolysis. In the very near future, electricity generated at a megawatt DE power plant built in the ocean will be converted to hydrogen and brought to Japan and other countries by tankers [22], as shown in Figure 8. Countries receiving hydrogen can use it as fuel for cars and planes, or to generate electricity using hydrogen again.
Figure 19. The hydrogen generation equipment using electrolysis: (a) DEG and hydrogen generation buoy; (b) Fuel cell and electrolysis.

3.2.4. Combination of a Piezoelectric Power Generation System and Dielectric Elastomer Generator

DEs require an initial charge before they can start generating electricity. In addition, DEs require high direct current (DC) voltage. Therefore, we considered a self-excited DEG circuit using a piezoelectric element [47]. Piezo has the advantage of generating electricity even with slight vibrations without an initial charge.
Therefore, in the circuit we are proposing, the piezoelectric element vibrates to generate a voltage, and the generated voltage is boosted to a high voltage value by the Cockcroft–Walton circuit to charge the DE. The high voltage generated by the DE causes the ringing choke converter circuit to step down the generated voltage to a predetermined value and charge the secondary battery.
However, the problem is that the piezo output is too small. The simulation seems to work, but in reality, it is necessary to reduce the loss of the components that make up this circuit as much as possible, and further studies are required.
In wave power, there is always physical movement, and this coupling system is less powerful, but is ideal for slow-moving cases and occasionally moving slow cases.


  1. Institute for Sustainable Energy Policies. White Paper on Renewable Energy 2016. Available online: (accessed on 20 April 2021).
  2. Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP23), Bonn, Germany, 6–17 November 2017. Available online: (accessed on 20 April 2021).
  3. Carbon Dioxide Emissions Virtually Zero in 2050; Ministry of the Environment: Tokyo, Japan, 2020.
  4. Miyazaki, T.; Osawa, H. Search Report of Wave Power Devices. In Proceedings of the 2007 Spring Conference of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers, Kanazawa, Japan, 31 July–3 August 2007; pp. 43–46.
  5. Ashida, K.; Ichiki, M.; Tanaka, M.; Kitahara, T. Power Generation Using Piezo Element: Energy Conversion Efficiency of Piezo Element. In Proceedings of the JAME Annual Meeting, Tokyo, Japan, 1–4 August 2000; pp. 139–140.
  6. Asaka, K.; Okuzaki, H. (Eds.) Soft Actuators: Materials, Modeling, Applications, and Future Perspectives; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; Volume 13, pp. 183–195.
  7. Yuan, X.; Changgeng, S.; Yan, G.; Zhenghong, Z. Application review of dielectric electroactive polymers (DEAPs) and piezoelectric materials for vibration energy harvesting. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2016, 744, 12077.
  8. Pelrine, R.; Chiba, S. Review of Artificial Muscle Approaches. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Micromachine and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan, 14–16 October 1992; pp. 1–9.
  9. Chiba, S.; Stanford, S.; Pelrine, R.; Kornbluh, R.; Prahlad, H. Electroactive Polymer Artificial Muscle. JRSJ 2006, 24, 38–42.
  10. Chiba, S.; Waki, M.; Kormbluh, R.; Pelrine, R. Innovative Power Generators for Energy Harvesting Using Electroactive Polymer Artificial Muscles, 2008, Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 2008. In Proceedings of the SPIE; Bar-Cohen, Y., Ed.; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2008; Volume 6927, pp. 1–9.
  11. Chiba, S.; Waki, M.; Ono, K.; Hatano, R.; Taniyama, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Okada, E.; Ohyama, K. Challenge of creating high performance dielectric elastomers. In Proceedings of the SPIE 2021 (Smart Structures and Materials Symposium and its 23rd Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) Conference), Virtual, Online, 22–26 March 2021; pp. 1157–1162.
  12. Chiba, S.; Waki, M. The Challenge of Controlling a Small Mars Plane. In Solar Planets and Exoplanets; InTech: London, UK, 2021.
  13. Koh, S.J.; Zhao, X.; Suo, Z. Maximal Energy That Can Be Converted by a Dielectric Elastomer Generator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 262902–262903.
  14. Carpi, F.; Anderson, I.; Bauer, B.; Frediani Gallone, G.; Gei, M.; Graaf, C. Standards for dielectric transducers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 24, 105025.
  15. Jean-Mistral, C.; Basrour, S.; Chaillout, J.-J. Comparison of electroactive polymers for energy scavenging applications. Smart Mater. Struct. 2010, 19, 085012.
  16. Zhong, X. Dielectric Elastomer Generators for Wind Energy Harvesting. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2010.
  17. Yurchenko, D.; Lai, Z.; Thomson, G.; Val, D.; Bobryk, R. Parametric study of a novel vibro-impact energy harvesting system with dielectric elastomer. Appl. Energy 2017, 208, 456–470.
  18. Thomson, G.; Lai, Z.; Val, D.; Yurchenko, D. Advantages of nonlinear energy harvesting with dielectric elastomers. J. Sound Vib. 2019, 442, 167–182.
  19. Moretti, G.; Papini, G.P.R.; Righi, M.; Forehand, D.; Ingram, D.; Vertechy, R.; Fontana, M. Resonant wave energy harvester based on dielectric elastomer generator. Smart Mater. Struct. 2018, 27, 035015.
  20. Chiba, S.A.; Waki, M.; Tanaka, Y.; Tsurumi, N.; Okamoto, K.; Nagase, K.; Honma, M.; Yokota, H.; Odagiri, K.; Sato, H.; et al. Elastomer Transducers. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2016, 97, 61–74.
  21. Huang, J.; Shian, S.; Suo, Z.; Clarke, D. Maximizing the Energy Density of Dielectric Elastomer Generators Using Equi-Biaxial Loading. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 5056–5061.
  22. Lin, G.; Chen, M.; Song, D. Large-train, rigid-to-rigid deformation of bistable elctroactive polymers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Energy and Environment Technology, ICEET 2009, Guilin, China, 16–18 October 2009; pp. 782–786.
  23. Brouchu, P.A.; Li, H.; Niu, X.; Pei, Q. Factors Influencing the Performance of Dielectric Elastomer Energy Harvesters. In Proceedings of the SPIE; SPIE: San Diego, CA, USA, 2010.
  24. Vertechy, R.; Papini, G.P.; Rosati, P.; Fontana, M. Reduced Model and Application of Inflating Circular Diaphragm Dielectric Elastomer Generators for Wave Energy Harvesting. J. Vib. Acoust. Trans. ASME 2015, 137, 11–16.
  25. Bortot, E.; Gei, M. Harvesting Energy with Load-driven Dielectric Elastomer Annular Membranes Deforming Out-of-plane. Extreme Mech. Lett. 2015, 5, 62–73.
  26. Moretti, G.; Fontana, M.; Vertechy, R. Parallelogram-shaped Dielectric Elastomer Generators: Analytical model and Experimental Validation. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2015, 26, 740–751.
  27. Moretti, G.; Papini, G.P.R.; Daniele, L.; Forehand, D.; Ingram, D.; Vertechy, R.; Fontana, M. Modelling and testing of a wave energy converter based on dielectric elastomer generators. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2019, 475, 20180566.
  28. Brochu, P.; Yuan, W.; Zhang, H.; Pei, Q. Dielectric Elastomers for Direct Wind-to-Electricity2009, Power Generation. In Proceedings of the ASME Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent System, Oxnard, CA, USA, 21–23 September 2009.
  29. Zhou, J.; Jiang, L.; Khayat, R. Dynamic Analysis of a Tunable Viscoelastic Dielectric Elastomer Oscillator under External Excitation. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 025005.
  30. Jean-Mistral, C.; Basrour, S.; Chaillout, J.-J. Dielectric polymer: Scavenging energy from human motion. In Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 2008; International Society for Optics and Photonics: San Diego, CA, USA, 2008.
  31. Chiba, S.; Waki, M. Application to dielectric elastomer materials, power assist products, artificial muscle drive system. In Next-Generation Polymer/Polymer Development, New Application Development and Future Prospects; Technical Information Association: Tokyo, Japan, 2019; Section 3, Chapter 4; ISBN-10: 4861047382, ISBN-13: 978-4861047381.
  32. Arena, F.; Daniele, L.; Fiamma, V.; Fontana, M.; Malara, G.; Moretti, G.; Romolo, A.; Papini, G.P.R.; Scialò, A.; Vertechy, R. Field Experiments on Dielectric Elastomer Generators Integrated on a U-OWC Wave Energy Converter. In Proceedings of the Ocean Renewable Energy; ASME International: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Volume 10.
  33. Kovacs, G.M. Manufacturing polymer transducers: Opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, Denver, CO, USA, 4–8 March 2018.
  34. Pelrine, R.; Kornbluh, R.D.; Pei, Q. Dielectric elastomers: Past, present, and potential future. In Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) XX; Bar-Cohen, Y., Ed.; SPIE: Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
  35. Chiba, S.; Waki, M.; Wada, T.; Hirakawa, Y.; Matsuda, K.; Ikoma, T. Consistent OceanWave Energy Harvesting Using Electroactive (Dielectric Elastomer) Artificial Muscle Generators. In Applied Energy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 497–502. ISSN 0306-2619.
  36. McKay, T.; O’Brien, B.; Calius, E.; Anderson, I. Soft Generators Using Dielectric Elastomers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 1–3.
  37. Anderson, I.; Gisby, T.; McKay O’Brienl, B.; Calius, E. Multi-functional Dielectric Elas T.tomer Artificial Muscles for Soft and Smart Machines. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 041101.
  38. Kessel, V.; Wattez, R.; Bauer, P. Analyses and Comparison of an Energy Harvesting System for Dielectric Elastomer Generators Using a Passive Harvesting Concept: The Voltage-clamped Multi-phase System. In Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures and Materials+ Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, International Society for Optics and Photonics, San Diego, CA, USA, 8–12 March 2015; p. 943006.
  39. Zurkinden, A.; Campanile, F.; Martinelli, L. Wave Energy Converter through Piezoelectric Polymers. In Proceedings of the COMSOL User Conference 2007, Grenoble, France, 23–24 October 2007.
  40. Chiba, S.; Waki, M.; Fujita, K.; Song, Z.; Ohyama, K.; Zhu, S. Recent Progress on Soft Transducers for Sensor Networks. In Technologies and Eco-Innovation toward Sustainability II; Hu, A.H., Ed.; Springer Nature: London, UK, 2019.
  41. Chiba, S.; Kornbluh, R.; Pelrine, R.; Waki, M. Low-cost Hydrogen Production from Electroactive Polymer Artificial Muscle Wave Power Generators. In Proceedings of the World Hydrogen Energy Conference 2008, Brisbane, Australia, 16–20 June 2008.
  42. Chiba, S.; Waki, M.; Masuda, K.; Ikoma, T.; Osawa, H.; Suwa, Y. Innovative 2012, Power Generation System for Harvesting Wave Energy, Design for Innovative Value Towards a Sustainable Society; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 1002–1007. ISBN 978-94-007-3010-6.
  43. Chiba, S.; Waki, M.; Masuda, K.; Ikoma, T.; Osawa, H.; Suwa, Y. Innovative Wave Power Generator Using Dielectric Elastomers Artificial Muscle. In Proceedings of the World Hydrogen Technologies Convention-2011, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 14–16 September 2011.
  44. Chiba, S.; Hasegawa, K.; Waki, M.; Kurita, S. An Experimental Study on the Motion of Floating Bodies Arranged in Series for Wave Power Generation. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 7, 281–289.
  45. Jiang, C.; Chiba, S.; Waki, M.; Fujita, K.; Moctar, O. An Investigation of Novel Wave Energy Generator Using Die-Lectric Elastomers. In Proceedings of the ASME 2020 39th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineers, Virtual, Online, 3–7 August 2020. OMAE-18106.
  46. Mitsumasa, I.; Miyazaki, T.; Iida, M. Estimation of Cumulative Output Energy of Oscillating Water Colum Wave Energy Converter Considering Power Take Off Damping. In Proceedings of the ASME 2020 39th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineers, Virtual, Online, 3–7 August 2020. OMAE-19172.
  47. Sakano, T.; Ohyama, K.; Zhu, S.; Waki, M.; Chiba, S. Experimental verification of a self-excited power generation system for dielectric elastomer generation using piezoelectric elements. In Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures + Nondestructive Evaluation, Online, 27 April–9 May 2020.
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to :
View Times: 1.6K
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 30 Jun 2021
Video Production Service