+ credit
| Version | Summary | Created by | Modification | Content Size | Created at | Operation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Luís Oliveira Machado | + 1286 word(s) | 1286 | 2020-11-11 09:10:31 | | | |
| 2 | Luís Oliveira Machado | -1 word(s) | 1285 | 2020-11-12 00:11:41 | | | | |
| 3 | Catherine Yang | + 2 word(s) | 1287 | 2020-11-12 02:46:29 | | | | |
| 4 | Luís Oliveira Machado | + 1658 word(s) | 2945 | 2020-12-01 11:39:02 | | | | |
| 5 | Luís Oliveira Machado | + 364 word(s) | 3309 | 2021-01-30 02:18:25 | | | | |
| 6 | Vicky Zhou | -2651 word(s) | 658 | 2022-04-13 11:29:56 | | |
Video Upload Options
Within the knowledge organization systems (KOS) set, the term “ontology” is paradigmatic of the terminological ambiguity in different typologies. Contributing to this situation is the indiscriminate association of the term “ontology”, both as a specific type of KOS and as a process of categorization, due to the interdisciplinary use of the term with different meanings. We present a systematization of the perspectives of different authors of ontologies, as representational artifacts, seeking to contribute to terminological clarification. Focusing the analysis on the intention, semantics and modulation of ontologies, it was possible to notice two broad perspectives regarding ontologies as artifacts that coexist in the knowledge organization systems spectrum. We have ontologies viewed, on the one hand, as an evolution in terms of complexity of traditional conceptual systems, and on the other hand, as a system that organizes ontological rather than epistemological knowledge. The focus of ontological analysis is the item to model and not the intentions that motivate the construction of the system.
References
- Gilchrist, A. Thesauri, Taxonomies and Ontologies—An Etymological Note. J. Doc. 2003, 59, 7–18.
- Vickery, B.C. Ontologies. J. Inf. Sci. 1997, 23, 277–286.
- Soergel, D. The Rise of Ontologies or the Reinvention of Classification. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 1999, 50, 1119–1120.
- Currás, E. Ontologies, Taxonomies and Thesauri in Systems Science and Systematics; Chandos Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2010; ISBN 978-1-84334-612-8.
- Dahlberg, I. What Is Knowledge Organization? Knowl. Organ. 2014, 41, 85–91.
- Mazzocchi, F. Knowledge Organization System (KOS). Encycl. Knowl. Organ. 2019. Available online: http://www.isko.org/cyclo/kos (accessed on 29 November 2020).
- Pieterse, V.; Kourie, D. Lists, Taxonomies, Lattices, Thesauri and Ontologies: Paving a Pathway Through a Terminological Jungle. Knowl. Organ. 2014, 41, 217–229.
- Biagetti, M.T. Ontologies (as Knowledge Organization Systems). Encycl. Knowl. Organ. 2020. Available online: https://www.isko.org/cyclo/ontologies (accessed on 29 November 2020).
- Hjørland, B. Knowledge Organization (KO). Encycl. Knowl. Organ. 2019. Available online: http://www.isko.org/cyclo/knowledge_organization (accessed on 29 November 2020).
- Smiraglia, R.P. The Elements of Knowledge Organization; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; ISBN 978-3-319-09356-7.
- Souza, R.R.; Tudhope, D.; Almeida, M.B. Towards a Taxonomy of KOS: Dimensions for Classifying Knowledge Organization Systems. Knowl. Organ. 2012, 39, 179–192.