References

1. Patrick Hayes. The naive physics manifesto. In Expert systems in the micro-electronic age; D. Michie, Eds.; Edinburgh University Press: Trowbridge, 1979; pp. 242–270.Alan Gilchrist; Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies – an etymological note. Journal of Documentation 2003, 59, 7-18, 10.1108/00220410310457984.
2. George H. Mealy; Another look at data. PBrian Vickery; Ontologies. Jouroceedings of the November 14-16, 1967, joint computer conferenal of Information Science on - AFIPS '67 19967, (fall), 525-534, 10.1145/1465611.1465682., 23, 277-286, 10.1177/016555159702300402.
3. Thomas Gruber. Ontology. In Encyclopedia of Database Systems; L. Liu; M. Ozsu, Eds.; Springer: New York. 2009, 1963–1965.Dagobert Soergel; The rise of ontologies or the reinvention of classification. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1999, 50, 1119-1120, 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1999)50:12<1119::aid-asi12>3.0.co;2-i.
4. Robert Neches; Richard Fikes; Tim Finin; Thomas Gruber; Ramesh Patil; Ted Senator; William Swartout; Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing. AIIngetraut Dahlberg; What is Knowledge Organization? . Knowledge MaOrgazinizatione 201991, 4, 412, 36–56., 85–91.
5. Qiaoli Zhu; Xuesong Kong; Song Hong; Junli Li; Zongyi He; Global ontology research progress: a bibliometric analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management 2015, 67, 27-54, 10.1108/ajim-05-2014-0061.Emilia Currás. Ontologies, Taxonomies and Thesauri in Systems Science and Systematics; Chandos Publishing: Oxford, 2010; pp. 1-27.
6. Alan Gilchrist; Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies – an etymological note. Journal of Documentation 2003, 59, 7-18, 10.1108/00220410310457984.Fulvio Mazzocchi. Knowledge organization system (KOS). Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization; B. Hjørland; C. Gnoli, Eds.; ISKO. 2019. http://www.isko.org/cyclo/kos
7. Gercina Lima; Benilde Maculan; Estudo comparativo das estruturas semânticas em diferentes sistemas de organização do conhecimento. CiêVreda Pieterse; Derrick G. Kourie; Lists, Taxonomies, Lattices, Thesauri and Ontologies: Paving a Pathway Through a Terminological Jungle. Knciaowledge da InformaçãOrganizatio n 2017, 4, 46, 60-72.1, 217-229, 10.5771/0943-7444-2014-3-217.
8. Brian Vickery; Ontologies. Journal of Information Science 1997, 23, 277-286, 10.1177/016555159702300402.Maria Biagetti. Ontologies (as knowledge organization systems). Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization; B. Hjørland; C. Gnoli, Eds.; ISKO. 2020. http://www.isko.org/cyclo/ontologies
9. Luís Machado; Maria Simões; Renato Souza; Relações disciplinares entre a Ciência da Informação e a “tríade” Biblioteconomia, Arquivística e Documentação (1960-2000). Ciência da Informação 2017, 46, 33–50.Birger Hjørland. Knowledge organization (KO). Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization; B. Hjørland; C. Gnoli, Eds.; ISKO. 2019. http://www.isko.org/cyclo/knowledge_organization
10. Maurício Almeida; Revisiting ontologies: A necessary clarification. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2013, 64, 1682-1693, 10.1002/asi.22861.Richard Smiraglia. The Elements of Knowledge Organization; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2014; pp. 43-50.
11. Giunchiglia Fausto; Dutta Biswanath; Maltese Vincenzo; From Knowledge Organization to Knowledge Representation. Renato Souza; Douglas Tudhope; Maurício Almeida; Towards a Taxonomy of KOS: Dimensions for Classifying Knowledge Organization Systems. Knowledge Organization 2014, 41, 44-56.2, 39, 179-192, 10.5771/0943-7444-2012-3-179.
12. Maria Campos; Linair Campos; A organização do conhecimento e suas teorias de representação: A ontologia de fundamentação como um modelo teórico para a representação de domínios. In Proceedings of the XIII Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação (Enancib); Rio de Janeiro. Proceedings of the XIII Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação (Enancib) 2012, (October 28-31), 1-18.Barry Smith. Ontology. In Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information; L. Floridi, Eds.; Blackwell: Oxford, 2003; pp. 155–166.
13. Fulvio Mazzocchi. Knowledge organization system (KOS). Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization; B. Hjørland; C. Gnoli, Eds.; ISKO. 2019. http://www.isko.org/cyclo/kosGiancarlo Guizzardi. Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. Doctoral thesis, Telematica Instituut / CTIT: Enschede, 2005
14. Renato Souza; Douglas Tudhope; Maurício Almeida; Towards a Taxonomy of KOS: Dimensions for Classifying Knowledge Organization Systems. Knowledge Organization 2012, 39, 179-192, 10.5771/0943-7444-2012-3-179.Boris Henning. What is Formal Ontology? In Applied Ontology: An Introduction; K. Munn; B. Smith, Eds.; Ontos Verlag: Heusenstamm, 2008; pp. 39–56.
15. Vreda Pieterse; Derrick G. Kourie; Lists, Taxonomies, Lattices, Thesauri and Ontologies: Paving a Pathway Through a Terminological Jungle. Knowledge Organization 2014, 41, 217-229, 10.5771/0943-7444-2014-3-217.Peter van Inwagen; Meghan Sullivan. Metaphysics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; Z. Edward, Ed.; Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2018. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/metaphysics/
16. Dagobert Soergel; The rise of ontologies or the reinvention of classification. Maurício Almeida; Revisiting ontologies: A necessary clarification. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 201999, 50, 1119-1120, 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1999)50:12<1119::aid-asi12>3.0.co;2-i.3, 64, 1682-1693, 10.1002/asi.22861.
17. Birger Hjørland. Knowledge organization (KO). Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization; B. Hjørland; C. Gnoli, Eds.; ISKO. 2019. http://www.isko.org/cyclo/knowledge_organizationAmie Thomasson. Categories. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; Z. Edward, Ed.; Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2018. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/categories/
18. Luís Machado; Maurício Almeida; Renato Souza; What Researchers are Currently Saying about Ontologies: A Review of Recent Web of Science Articles. Knowledge Organization 2020, 47, 199-219, 10.5771/0943-7444-2020-3-199.Barry Smith. Ontology and Information Systems. National Science Foundation. 2004. http://ontology.buffalo.edu/ontology_long.pdf
19. Thomas Gruber; A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. KnGeorge H. Mealy; Another look at data. Prowlceedge Acquisitiings of the November 14-16, 1967, joint computer conference on - AFIPS '67 1993, 5, 199-220, 10.1006/knac.1993.1008.67, (fall), 525-534, 10.1145/1465611.1465682.
20. Thomas Gruber; Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 1995, 43, 907-928, 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081.Patrick Hayes. The naive physics manifesto. In Expert systems in the micro-electronic age; D. Michie, Eds.; Edinburgh University Press: Trowbridge, 1979; pp. 242–270.
21. Daniel Kless; Jutta Lindenthal; Simon Milton; Edmund Kazmierczak. Interoperability of Knowledge Organization Systems with and through Ontologies. In Universal Decimal Classification Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge. The Hague: UDC Consortium. 2011.Barry Smith; Roberto Casati; Naive Physics: An Essay in Ontology. Philosophical Psychology 1994, 7, 225–244.
22. Mauricio Almeida; Renato Souza; Fred Fonseca; Semantics in the Semantic Web: A Critical Evaluation. Knowledge Organization 2011, 38, 187-203, 10.5771/0943-7444-2011-3-187.Thomas Gruber. Ontology. In Encyclopedia of Database Systems; L. Liu; M. Ozsu, Eds.; Springer: New York. 2009, 1963–1965.
23. Luís Machado; Renato Souza; Maria Simões; Semantic Web or Web of Data? A Diachronic Study (1999 to 2017) of the Publications of Tim Berners‐Lee and the World Wide Web Consortium. JournalRobert Neches; Richard Fikes; Tim Finin; Thomas Gruber; Ramesh Patil; Ted Senator; William Swartout; Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing. AI of the AssociMation for Information Scigazinence and Technology 20 199, 70, 701–714, 10.1002/asi.24111.1, 12, 36–56.
24. Daniel Martinéz-Ávila; Melodie Fox. The Construction of Ontology: A Discourse Analysis. In Ontology for knowledge organization; R. Smiraglia; H. Lee, Eds.; Ergon-Verlag: Würzburg, 2015; pp. 13–37.Qiaoli Zhu; Xuesong Kong; Song Hong; Junli Li; Zongyi He; Global ontology research progress: a bibliometric analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management 2015, 67, 27-54, 10.1108/ajim-05-2014-0061.
25. Stefano Borgo; Pascal Hitzler; Some Open Issues After Twenty Years of Formal Ontology. FormGercina Lima; Benilde Maculan; Estudo comparativo das estruturas semânticas em diferentes sistemas de organização do conhecimento. Ciêncial Ontology inda Informatiçãon Systems Proceedings of the 10th International Conference 2018, 307, 46, 1–9., 60-72.
26. Barry Smith; Ontology (Science). Formal OThomas Gruber; A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Kntology in Information Systems Proceedings of the 5th Internatwledge Acquisitional Conference 2008, 183, 21–35. 1993, 5, 199-220, 10.1006/knac.1993.1008.
27. Barry Smith. Ontology. In Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information; L. Floridi, Eds.; Blackwell: Oxford, 2003; pp. 155–166.Thomas Gruber; Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 1995, 43, 907-928, 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081.
28. Roberto Poli; Leo Obrst. The Interplay Between Ontology as Categorial Analysis and Ontology as Technology. In Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications; R. Poli; M. Healy; A. Kameas, Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, 2010; pp. 1–26.Luís Machado; Maurício Almeida; Renato Souza; What Researchers are Currently Saying about Ontologies: A Review of Recent Web of Science Articles. Knowledge Organization 2020, 47, 199-219, 10.5771/0943-7444-2020-3-199.
29. John Sowa; Top-level ontological categories. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 1995, 43, 669-685, 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1068.What is an Ontology? by Thomas Gruber . KSL: Knowledge systems, AI laboratory. Retrieved 2020-12-1
30. Thomas Gruber; “Every ontology is a treaty – a social agreement – among people with some common motive in sharing.”: Tom Gruber’s interview by Miltiadis Lytras. Bull. AIS Spec. Interest Group Semantic Web Inf. Syst. 2004, 1, 1-5.Michael Genesereth; Nils Nilsson.. Logical foundations of artificial intelligence; Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, 1988; pp. 9-44.
31. Barry Smith; Christopher Welty. Ontology: towards a new synthesis. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - FOIS ’01; ACM Press: Ogunquit, Maine, USA, 2001. pp. iii–ix.
32. Pierre Grenon. A Primer on Knowledge Representation and Ontological Engineering. In Applied Ontology: An Introduction; K. Munn; B. Smith, Eds., Eds.; Ontos Verlag: Heusenstamm, 2008; pp. 57–81.
33. Rudi Studer; V.Richard Benjamins; Dieter Fensel; Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering 1998, 25, 161-197, 10.1016/s0169-023x(97)00056-6.
34. Robert Arp; Barry Smith; Andrew Spear. Building ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology; MIT press: London, 2015; pp. 1-41.
35. Mauricio Almeida; Renato Rocha Souza; Fred Fonseca; Semantics in the Semantic Web: A Critical Evaluation. Knowledge Organization 2011, 38, 187-203, 10.5771/0943-7444-2011-3-187.
36. Roberto Poli; Leo Obrst. The Interplay Between Ontology as Categorial Analysis and Ontology as Technology. In Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications; R. Poli; M. Healy; A. Kameas, Eds., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2010; pp. 1-26.
37. Barry Smith; Ontology (Science). Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference. 2008, 183, 21–35
38. Ludger Jansen. Classifications. In Applied Ontology: An Introduction; K. Munn; B. Smith, Eds.; Ontos Verlag: Heusenstamm, 2018; pp. 159–172.
39. John F. Sowa; Top-level ontological categories. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 1995, 43, 669-685, 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1068.
40. Thomas Gruber. “Every ontology is a treaty – a social agreement – among people with some common motive in sharing.”; M. Lytras, Int. 2004. http://tomgruber.org/writing/sigsemis-2004.pdf
41. Stefano Borgo; Pascal Hitzler. Some Open Issues After Twenty Years of Formal Ontology. In Formal Ontology in Information Systems Proceedings of the 10th International Conference (FOIS 2018); S. Borgo; P. Hitzler; O. Kutz, Eds.; IOS Press, 2018; Vol. 306, pp. 1–9
42. Daniel Moody; Graeme Shanks; Improving the quality of data models: empirical validation of a quality management framework. Information Systems 2003, 28, 619-650, 10.1016/s0306-4379(02)00043-1.
43. Daniel Kless; Jutta Lindenthal; Simon Milton; Edmund Kazmierczak. Interoperability of knowledge organization systems with and through ontologies. In Proceedings of the Universal Decimal Classification Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge; A. Slavic; E. Civallero, Eds.; Ergon Verlag: Würzburg, 2011; pp. 55–74
44. Hongwei Zhu; Stuart Madnick. A Lightweight Ontology Approach to Scalable Interoperability; MIT Sloan Research Paper n. 4621-06; Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Massachusetts, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.926607
45. Luís Machado; Renato Souza; Maria Simões; Semantic Web or Web of Data? A Diachronic Study (1999 to 2017) of the Publications of Tim Berners‐Lee and the World Wide Web Consortium. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2019, 70, 701–714, 10.1002/asi.24111.
46. Daniel Martínez Ávila; Melodie Fox. The Construction of Ontology: A Discourse Analysis. In Ontology for knowledge organization; R. Smiraglia; H.-L. Lee, Eds., Eds.; Ergon-Verlag: Würzburg, 2015; pp. 13-37.
47. Maria Villela; Alcione Oliveira; José Braga. Modelagem Ontológica no Apoio à Modelagem Conceitual. In XVIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Engenharia de Software – SBES; Brasília, 2004; pp. 241–256.
48. Nicola Guarino; Giancarlo Guizzardi; John Mylopoulosc. On the philosophical foundations of conceptual models. In Information modelling and knowledge bases XXXI; International Conference on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases, A. Dahanayake, Ed.; 2020; Vol. 321, pp. 1–15