1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Carbon Emission Intensity

    Subjects: Others
    View times: 107
    Submitted by: Zhi-xue Zheng

    Definition

    The definition of Carbon Emission Intensity (CEI) according to the INDCs is "the amount of carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP". As defined, CEI is an emission reduction indicator that takes into account environmental protection and economic development, which has important reference significance for the emission reduction work of developing countries.

    1. Introduction

    With worldwide energy consumption in a constant increase, large amounts of Greenhouse Gasses (GHG), especially CO2, are being emitted directly into the atmosphere. This has triggered a series of global climate change issues—such as the Greenhouse Effect—and is posing a considerable threat to human survival and development. In order to address these challenges, through the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 2010, the United Nations advised all parties to make urgent efforts to significantly reduce their global carbon emissions [1]. Against such a background, countries all over the world are facing huge pressure to reduce emissions, especially developing countries, which need to balance the dual needs of environmental protection and economic growth.

    As the largest developing country, in the past few decades, China’s rapid economic development has caused steep increases in CO2 emissions, which mainly stem from fossil fuel combustion [2]. In 2017, CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion in China reached up to 9.26 Gt, accounting for 28.19% of the global total emissions (IEA Statistics, 2018, IEA Energy Atlas, http://energyatlas.iea.org/#!/tellmap/1378539487), which represents an over-fourfold increase from 2.12 Gt in 1990. As the country with the largest CO2 emissions in the world, China is facing tremendous pressure to reduce its emissions. In its Intended Nationality Determined Contributions (INDC) submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) on 30th June 2015, China promised that CO2 emissions per unit of GDP (CO2/GDP) will be reduced by 60–65% by 2030, on a 2005 basis [3]. In order to achieve national Carbon Emission Intensity (CEI) reduction targets, it is crucial to delve into the influential factors and to clarify the driving mechanisms of CEI.

    Since 2005, China has been committed to the simultaneous effort of economic development and environmental protection. Carbon intensity was reduced from 2.88 tons/10,000 yuan in 2005 to 1.11 tons/10,000 yuan in 2017. However, uneven regional development remains an urgent development problem. As shown in Figure 1, the level of China’s economic development has been significantly differentiated between regions, and the regional distribution of CEI has been characterized as high in the north and low in the south. The gap between the maximum value of 13.254 tons/10,000 yuan and the minimum value of 0.513 tons/10,000 yuan is quite large. The huge differences urgently need to be improved through the coordinated regional development route in order to achieve overall low-carbon development. In 2019, Chinese President Xi Jinping proposed to further promote the regional coordinated development strategy [4], which provides good strategic guidance and policy support for regionally-coordinated emission reduction. Therefore, studying the temporal and spatial characteristics of carbon intensity in China’s provinces, and the driving mechanism under the spatial effect, is of great significance for regional low-carbon cooperation in China. In addition, research on carbon intensity reduction from a provincial perspective in China can also provide a reference for emission reduction research in other countries or regions, especially in terms of regional cooperation in emission reduction.

    Figure 1. Space distribution of China’s provincial CEI and per capita GDP in 2017.

    China has a vast territory, a large population, complex national conditions, and great differences in its economy, industrial structure, energy consumption, and humanities and social sciences environment around its regions [5]. As a result, the complex CO2 emission situation leads to the great difficulty of CO2 mitigation. The difficulty of carbon emission reduction mainly comes from the spatial effects—such as spatial spillover and spatial heterogeneity—around provinces, caused by the negative externalities of CO2 emissions [6], leading to the complexity of its driving mechanism. In order to clarify the CEI driving mechanism, traditional methods can provide only limited help, because they neglect the spatial interaction, which may lead to inaccurate estimate results. This kind of spatial interaction can be solved by spatial econometrics; that is, by introducing spatial weight variables to handle the spatial effects in regression.

    2. Research on Carbon Emission Intensity

    At present, there is a large amount papers on CEI regarding carbon reduction in different countries, which mainly focus on spatial and temporal characteristics, influencing factors, and prediction research, etc. Specifically, the research on the spatial and temporal characteristics of CEI mainly focuses on spatial difference [6][7], the evolution of spatiotemporal patterns [8][9], and spatiotemporal heterogeneity [10][11], etc. The research on predictions regarding CEI focuses on the construction of predictive models [12][13], the prediction of CEI reduction target achievements [14][15][16], and scenario evolution analysis [17][18]. Based on the researches above, more and more studies have focused on the factors affecting carbon intensity, and have committed to accurately identifying the driving mechanism of carbon intensity, improving emission reduction policies, and realizing low-carbon development.

    2.1. Influencing Factors

    The research on influencing factors has mostly focused on energy-related (ENR) and economy-related (ECO) factors, as economic growth, energy consumption and carbon emission are causal to each other, and there is a direct and inevitable connection [19]. Fernandoa and Hor [20] analyzed the impact of energy management on carbon emissions in Malaysian manufacturing based on PLS-SEM (Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling) software, and found that energy audits and energy efficiency are the key factors for the mitigation of carbon emissions. Vujović et al. [21] used the neuro-fuzzy method to explore the relationship between energy, carbon intensity and economic growth. It was found that alternative energy has the greatest impact on carbon emission intensity. Some papers have also conducted research on the impact of urbanization (URB) on carbon emissions, as urbanization has a large demand for infrastructure construction, which has caused a lot of carbon emissions [22]. Liu and Liu [5] researched the spatial spillover effects of urbanization on carbon emissions in China by dividing China into Eastern, Middle and Western regions, in order to find the regional disparity. The results show that, as urbanization improves, its influence on local carbon emissions changes from positive to negative, and then the negative influence becomes weaker. With the development of economic globalization, factors related to international trade (INT), including import and export trade, foreign direct investment, etc., have become more and more important to the carbon emissions of countries and regions [23]. Pan et al. [24] studied the carbon intensity influencing factors of 34 OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries based on genetic programming (GP) and symbolic regression methods (SRM), creatively using foreign direct investment as an influencing factor. In addition, technological innovation (TEI) is one of the main measures that can be used to reduce carbon emissions without reducing economic growth performance [25]. Nguyen et al. [26] explored the role of information and communication technologies and innovation in driving carbon emissions in 13 selected G-20 countries, based on quantile panel regression (QPR). Besides this, the impact of carbon emission trading (CET) [27][28] and power (POW) factors [29][30] on carbon intensity has been studied in recent years. It can be seen that most studies only consider factors of one or two aspects, and few consider all of the aspects of factors as a system. This has led to relatively one-sided conclusions and limited reference for the overall planning and reduction of emissions. With respect to the research dimensions, most studies have only carried out research on the influential factors of CEI from a temporal dimension, and relatively few studies come from a comprehensively spatial-temporal dimension using space panel data.

    2.2. Driving mechanism

    The methods for the analysis of the driving mechanism of CEI in existing research are mainly based on the following three theories: decomposition analysis, machine learning, and spatial econometrics. Decomposition analysis is one of the classic theories that addresses influencing factors. It has been widely applied to the exploration of the factors that influence CO2 and other polluting gas emissions since the 1990s, and continues to be examined with respect to influential factors regarding CEI [31]. It can be divided into the two main categories of index decomposition analysis (IDA) [23][27][29][32][33] and structural decomposition analysis (SDA) [34][35][36][37]. The advent of Machine Learning (ML) technology has greatly improved research on influencing factors, it can solve some of the problems which exist in traditional research, such as the selection of indicators and the limitation of large data processing. Therefore, it has been widely used in various research fields, including carbon intensity, in recent years [12][24]. Although the above two mainstream methods have their own advantages in the research of carbon intensity factors, none of them can deal with complex spatial effects in theory, leading to a lack of research on the estimation of the influencing factors considering spatial effects.

    Spatial econometric analysis, as a branch of econometrics, can handle spatial effects in regression models of panel data, such as spatial interaction and spatial autocorrelation. Since Anselin [38] systematically structured the spatial econometric method, it has been widely used in economic policy-related research. With greater emphasis being placed on CO2 emissions-related research over the last few years, spatial econometric analysis has begun to be applied to the research on CEI. However, due to its relatively late appearance, few related studies are currently available. Zhang et al. [39] studied the effect of urbanization on China’s CEI using the spatial Durbin mode, which is based on spatial econometric analysis, and comprehensively estimated the impact of population and land urbanization on carbon emissions, with consideration of the spatial effects. It has been proved that spatial econometric analysis can restore the actual spatial effects well [5][39], but there are few studies on the application of this method to carbon intensity, and there is a lack of the comprehensive consideration of various factors on the driving mechanism of carbon intensity.

    3. Main results and analysis

    3.1 Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis

    In order to verify the spatial autocorrelation of the CEI among the provinces, a global spatial autocorrelation (GSA) test was performed using the Global Moran’s I. The values of the Moran’s I from 2005 to 2017 are all positive and greater than 0.25, and all of the, passed the significance test at the 1% level or more, except for 2007, in which the Moran’s I was significant at the level of 5%. This indicates that the CEI among provinces in China had obvious positive spatial autocorrelation characteristics; that is, when the CEI is higher than average in a province, it is often higher than average in the regions around it, and vice versa. In addition, during the research period, the Moran’s I values showed an overall upward trend, meaning that the spatial autocorrelation of CEI became stronger and stronger.

    The GSA test can only prove that there is a spatial autocorrelation in the CEI among the provinces. The specific spatial autocorrelation of each province needs to be further tested using the local space autocorrelation (LSA) test. In order to express the result more clearly, the spatial distribution characteristics of the CEI in the provinces are divided into four categories: High–High, High–Low, Low–High, and Low–Low. The specific meanings are as follows: High–High indicates that the CEI of a province, as well as its neighboring provinces, are higher than the average level, Low–Low is the opposite; High–Low indicates that the CEI of a province is higher than the average level, while its neighboring provinces are lower than average, and Low–High is the opposite. High–High and Low–Low reflect the spatial aggregation effect; High–Low and Low–High reflect the spatial heterogeneity effect. The results of the LSA test are revealed by the Moran Scatter Plot (MSP) and the Local Indication of the Spatial Association (LISA) cluster map, respectively.

    Figure 2 shows the MSP in 2005, 2011 and 2017, which intuitively indicates the local spatial autocorrelation and the dynamic trends of the provincial CEI in China.

    Figure 2. MSP for the Chinese provincial carbon emission intensity.

    In order to show the local spatial correlation of specific provinces more intuitively, Local Indication of Spatial Association (LISA) agglomeration maps of China’s provincial CEI in different years at a 5% significance level were drawn (Figure 3). According to the maps, High–High provinces are mainly distributed in northern inland areas, such as Inner Mongolia and Gansu, while Low–Low provinces are mainly distributed in southeastern coastal areas, such as Zhejiang and Fujian. This distribution is mainly caused by the uneven distribution of various resources. The inland areas of northern China are rich in mineral resources, but are relatively undeveloped in their technology and economy. Their industrial structure is dominated by secondary industry, and their tertiary industry is mainly driven by transportation, so there is a strong dependence on fossil energy—such as mineral resources—in these provinces. The provinces located in the southeast coastal area are relatively developed in their economies, and their industrial structure is dominated by tertiary industry, which is mainly driven by the financial industry, the service industry, and high-tech industries, so these areas are less dependent on energy.

    Figure 3. LISA cluster map for the Chinese provincial carbon emission intensity.

    In this part, the results of the global and local spatial autocorrelation test proved that there is a significant spatial autocorrelation in China’s provincial carbon emission intensity (CEI), and the degree of the spatial correlation shows an upward trend with time, which puts forward an urgent need for the exploration on the driving mechanism of CEI under the space effect, and for the formulation of emission reduction measures from the perspective of regional coordination.

    3.2 Regional Coordinated Emission Mitigation Mechanism

    In order to explore regionally-cooperated emission mitigation mechanisms, it is necessary to clarify the spatial spillover effects of the factors that influence CEI, which is reflected by the indirect effect of changes in the local influencing factors on the CEI of the adjacent areas. Figure 4 shows the direct, indirect and total effects of various influential factors on the CEI obtained from the SDPM based on spatial fixed effects.

    Figure 4. The direct, indirect, and total effects of the influential factors.

    It can be seen from Figure 4 that the direct and indirect effects of GDP, URB, ENS, and TEL are in the same direction, while the direct and indirect effects of INS, ENI, OPL, and FDI are reversed. Among them, the total effects of GDP, INS, OPL, and FDI on CEI are negative in descending order of the coefficient, while the total effects of URB, ENS, ENI and TEL are positive in descending order of the coefficient. Besides this, according to the significance test results of the regression coefficients, with the exception of INS and TEL, there are significant indirect effects with respect to the other six influencing factors, reflecting the spatial spillover effects. To sum up, GDP, URB, ENS and ENI have relatively stronger effects on CEI, with a significant space spillover effect. Therefore, further analysis of these four influencing factors should be carried out.

    4. Conclusions and Policy Implications

    4.1. Main conclusions

    (a) China’s provincial carbon emission intensity has significant spatial autocorrelation characteristics, and it shows an increasing trend with time;

    (b) economic development has a negative correlation with carbon intensity, and the space spillover effect is significant, which is a great driving force for regional carbon intensity reduction;

    (c) energy intensity has a positive correlation with local carbon intensity, but the spatial spillover effect is negative. When reducing carbon intensity by adjusting energy intensity, the impact on surrounding areas should be fully considered;

    (d) The energy structure and urbanization have a relatively important effect on the intensity of carbon emissions, and have significant space spillover effects.

    4.2. Policy implications

    First, Low-CEI regions, such as Beijing, Tianjin and Zhejiang, can use their advantages with respect to economic development in order to drive the industrial transition of the surrounding regions and the other regions of the nation with high-CEI. They could fully mobilize their own technology and talent advantages to provide technical support for the development of clean energy and waste gas treatment in large resource-rich provinces, such as Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, and Heilongjiang. Furthermore, with the state’s strategy of encouraging regional cooperation, regional resources can be shared, such as educational, cultural, tourism, and transportation resources.

    Next, the CO2 emission quotas and emission reduction responsibilities allocated from a whole region would be more sensible for Low–High agglomeration regions, such as the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. For regions that lie close to provinces with large resource reserves, their high CEI levels are often the result of the ease and convenience of procurement, and low transportation costs. These regions, such as Shaanxi and Hebei, bordering Shanxi; Qinghai and Gansu, bordering Xinjiang; and regions bordering Inner Mongolia, should focus on reducing their own demands for energy consumption by adjusting their industrial structures and transforming their underdeveloped production capacity. Simultaneously, other low-CEI regions that are not adjacent to high-carbon provinces with large resource reserves should assume more carbon emission reduction responsibilities as compensation, and should provide some support for the high emissions in high-carbon regions caused by their energy supply. In addition, high-CEI regions should work hard to advance the process of urbanization in a scientific and reasonable way, increase their talent introduction and research funding in order to promote the development of tertiary industry, and attract foreign direct investment, especially in energy production-related industries, which can bring advanced technologies, management models and cleaner production models from developed countries into the region.

    Finally, for energy-dependent high-CEI regions—such as Shanxi, Shaanxi, Inner Mongolia, Ningxia, Xinjiang, Heilongjiang and Jilin—the energy intensity and coal consumption ratio are much higher, and the development of the whole nation depends on the resource endowment and energy industry in these regions. Based on these conditions, it is important to replace traditional fossil energy sources, such as coal, with clean energy sources, such as wind and nuclear energy. It is very important to develop solutions for the practical technical problems and policy issues that stand in the way of acceptance, such as the problem of grid connection and electricity pricing in wind power generation technology.

    The entry is from 10.3390/su12198097

    References

    1. Zhou, X. Restraint Mechanism on Carbon Emission and Policies on Reducing Emission Home and Abroad. Contemp. Econ. Manag. 2013, 35, 35–39. (In Chinese)
    2. Han, X.; Cao, T.; Sun, T. Analysis on the variation rule and influencing factors of energy consumption carbon emission intensity in China’s urbanization construction. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 238, 117958.
    3. Fan, J.; Meng, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X. Coordinated emission mitigation mechanism of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in China: A perspective from CO2 emissions embodied in domestic trade. Energy Procedia 2019, 158, 3893–3900.
    4. Xi, J. Promote the formation of regional economic layout with complementary advantages and high-quality development. Qiushi 2019, 24, 1–2. (In Chinese)
    5. Liu, F.; Liu, C. Regional disparity, spatial spillover effects of urbanisation and carbon emissions in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 241, 118226.
    6. Song, C.; Zhao, T.; Wang, J. Spatial-temporal analysis of China’s regional carbon intensity based on ST-IDA from 2000 to 2015. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 238, 117874.
    7. Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Fang, C.; Feng, K. Inequalties in carbon intensity in China: A multi-scalar and multi-mechanism analysis. Appl. Energy 2019, 254, 113720.
    8. Yuan, H.; Qiu, F.; Jin, N. Spatial-temporal Changes of Industrial Carbon Emission Intensity in Jiangsu Province. Yunnan Geogr. Environ. Res. 2017, 29, 41–48. (In Chinese)
    9. Zhao, G.; Chen, L.; Sun, L.; Zhao, G. Markov Steady State Prediction of Carbon Emission Intensity in China Based on the Perspective of Spatial Differentiation. Sci. Technol. Manag. Res. 2017, 37, 228–233. (In Chinese)
    10. Wang, W.; Wang, W.; Xie, P.; Zhao, D. Spatial and temporal disparities of carbon emissions and interregional carbon compensation in major function-oriented zones: A case study of Guangdong province. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 245, 118873.
    11. Wang, Y. Spatio-Temporal Similarity and Distinction of China’s Carbon Intensity. Master’s Thesis, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, April 2017. (In Chinese).
    12. Acheampong, A.O.; Boateng, E.B. Modelling carbon emission intensity: Application of artificial neural network. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 225, 833–856.
    13. Pretis, F.; Roser, M. Carbon dioxide emission-intensity in climate projections: Comparing the observational record to socio-economic scenarios. Energy 2017, 135, 718–725.
    14. Akash, A.R.; Rao, A.B.; Chandel, M.K. Relevance of Carbon Capture & Sequestration in India’s Energy Mix to Achieve the Reduction in Emission Intensity by 2030 as per INDCs. Energy Procedia 2017, 114, 7492–7503.
    15. Juntueng, S.; Towprayoon, S.; Chiarakorn, S. Energy and carbon dioxide intensity of Thailand’s steel industry and greenhouse gas emission projection toward the year 2050. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 87, 46–56.
    16. Xian, Y.; Wang, K.; Shi, X.; Zhang, C.; Wei, Y.-M.; Huang, Z. Carbon emissions intensity reduction target for China’s power industry: An efficiency and productivity perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 1022–1034.
    17. Niu, D.; Wang, K.; Wu, J.; Sun, L.; Liang, Y.; Xu, X.; Yang, X. Can China achieve its 2030 carbon emissions commitment? Scenario analysis based on an improved general regression neural network. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118558.
    18. Zhang, C.; Su, B.; Zhou, K.; Yang, S. Decomposition analysis of China’s CO2 emissions (2000–2016) and scenario analysis of its carbon intensity targets in 2020 and 2030. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 668, 432–442.
    19. Azomahou, T.; Laisney, F.; Nguyen Van, P. Economic development and CO2 emissions: A nonparametric panel approach. J. Public Econ. 2006, 90, 1347–1363.
    20. Fernando, Y.; Hor, W.L. Impacts of energy management practices on energy efficiency and carbon emissions reduction: A survey of Malaysian manufacturing firms. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 126, 62–73.
    21. Vujović, T.; Petković, Z.; Pavlović, M.; Jović, S. Economic growth based in carbon dioxide emission intensity. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2018, 506, 179–185.
    22. Abdallh, A.A.; Abugamos, H. A semi-parametric panel data analysis on the urbanisation-carbon emissions nexus for the MENA countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 78, 1350–1356.
    23. Yang, X.; Su, B. Impacts of international export on global and regional carbon intensity. Appl. Energy 2019, 253, 113552.
    24. Pan, X.; Uddin, M.K.; Ai, B.; Pan, X.; Saima, U. Influential factors of carbon emissions intensity in OECD countries: Evidence from symbolic regression. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 220, 1194–1201.
    25. Erdoğan, S.; Yıldırım, S.; Yıldırım, D.Ç.; Gedikli, A. The effects of innovation on sectoral carbon emissions: Evidence from G20 countries. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 267, 110637.
    26. Nguyen, T.T.; Pham, T.A.T.; Tram, H.T.X. Role of information and communication technologies and innovation in driving carbon emissions and economic growth in selected G-20 countries. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 261, 110162.
    27. Zhou, B.; Zhang, C.; Song, H.; Wang, Q. How does emission trading reduce China’s carbon intensity? An exploration using a decomposition and difference-in-differences approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 676, 514–523.
    28. Cui, L.-B.; Fan, Y.; Zhu, L.; Bi, Q.-H. How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020 carbon intensity reduction target? Appl. Energy 2014, 136, 1043–1052.
    29. De Oliveira-De Jesus, P.M. Effect of generation capacity factors on carbon emission intensity of electricity of Latin America & the Caribbean, a temporal IDA-LMDI analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 101, 516–526.
    30. Zhang, H. Effects of electricity consumption on carbon intensity across Chinese manufacturing sectors. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 27414–27434.
    31. Kwon, T.-H. Decomposition of factors determining the trend of CO2 emissions from car travel in Great Britain (1970–2000). Ecol. Econ. 2005, 53, 261–275.
    32. Zhang, W.; Tang, X.; Yang, G.; Zha, D. Decomposition of CO2 emission intensity in Chinese MIs through a development mode extended LMDI method combined with a production-theoretical approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 702, 134787.
    33. Chang, C.; Dong, M.; Sui, B.; Chu, Y. Driving forces of global carbon emissions: From time- and spatial-dynamic perspectives. Econ. Model. 2019, 77, 70–80.
    34. Peters, G.P.; Weber, C.L.; Guan, D.; Hubacek, K. China’s growing CO2 emissions—A race between increasing consumption and efficiency gains. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 5939–5944.
    35. Robaina Alves, M.; Moutinho, V. Decomposition analysis and Innovative Accounting Approach for energy-related CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions intensity over 1996–2009 in Portugal. Energy 2013, 57, 775–787.
    36. Yan, J.; Su, B.; Liu, Y. Multiplicative structural decomposition and attribution analysis of carbon emission intensity in China, 2002–2012. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 198, 195–207.
    37. Zhu, B.; Su, B.; Li, Y. Input-output and structural decomposition analysis of India’s carbon emissions and intensity, 2007/08–2013/14. Appl. Energy 2018, 230, 1545–1556.
    38. Anselin, L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988.
    39. Zhang, G.; Zhang, N.; Liao, W. How do population and land urbanization affect CO2 emissions under gravity center change? A spatial econometric analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 202, 510–523.
    More