Disclosure of Nonfinancial Information: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Others

In this entry we concentrate on the segment of small companies in the financial sector in Europe. Services in this sector are developing rapidly and are not necessarily provided only by traditional banks and financial companies. Many nonfinancial companies provide financial services, and this may open the sector to additional risk. In this context, the aspects of both financial and nonfinancial reporting are important and need to be taken into consideration as a whole to provide a complex picture of a particular institution. The goal of this entry is to analyze sustainability reporting according to the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) by European financial services small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). First, we conducted a descriptive analysis of the features of nonfinancial information and its assurance, studying a sample of all European SMEs reporting according to the GRI from 2016–2018. Then, we chose only financial services SMEs to apply lexical analysis to their narrative reporting based on a corpus of 102,056 words. We conclude that nonfinancial information does not have the same importance as traditional financial information, and this sustainability reporting only complies with the minimum requirements. So, there is still a long way to go in this field.

  • European financial services SMEs
  • nonfinancial information
  • sustainable reporting
  • disclosure
  • lexical analysis
  • nonfinancial reporting

1. Introduction

Initially, disclosure of nonfinancial information was voluntarily assumed by companies, mainly large global ones. The European Commission decided that the heterogeneity in this field was an inconvenience for transparency and comparability, so it required the compulsory issuance of nonfinancial information by big European groups [1]. Although the transposition of this directive can vary and includes certain flexibility in order to be adopted by each Member State, no state has extended the obligation of issuing this sustainable information to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) [2]. Bearing in mind that most of the companies in Europe are SMEs, it is important to study the nonfinancial information that they provide because disclosure of nonfinancial information is a way to improve companies’ transparency and communication of social and ethical practices.

In this paper we use lexical analysis to study disclosure of nonfinancial information because it is mainly narrative, and this is a good way to obtain conclusions from the text provided and the words used to compose the narrative. The analysis is based on reporting by European financial sector SMEs, and the background on this field is scarce. Sustainability reporting in the financial sector is mainly inadequate and focused on financial aspects rather than on material issues, as highlighted by the UN when studying sustainability reporting in the financial sector [63]. Only a few of these initiatives of sustainability reporting provide a picture of all sustainability factors of financial companies [63]. In addition, the overwhelming majority of SMEs perceive sustainability reporting as a burden, and it appears that SMEs either do not have the capacity to comply or are reluctant to invest the necessary resources [64], so taking all this together, we propose the following research questions:

RQ1: Are European financial sector SMEs preparing their sustainability reports only in accordance with minimum nonfinancial disclosure requirements?

RQ2: Are European financial sector SMEs still more influenced by financial terms in their nonfinancial reporting?

2. Sustainability Reporting of SMEs

SMEs are the backbone of the European economy and are traditionally dependent on bank loans for their external financing. The last financial crisis and now the situation generated by COVID-19 have increased both the need for financial resources and the difficulties in accessing it. The European Commission highlights these difficulties and promotes the provision of suitable alternatives to bank loans, so it enacted a specific regulation “to make SMEs more visible to investors and markets more attractive and accessible for SMEs. Regulatory changes will keep the right balance between prudential regulation and financing of SMEs, and between investor protection and tailored measures for SMEs” [3]. This sector is also in the spotlight of transparency after the recent crisis and has an additional obligation with society to try to balance the unequal distribution of information [4]. The development of this sector is linked to economic growth [5], and the effect of the recent crisis on bank credit has increased the importance of other types of financial resources, such as trade credit [6]. Thus, the recent evolution of the financial sector has turned to SMEs to provide these services because their traditional problems in obtaining financial resources can be more easily solved by other SMEs [7]. Although at first sight the small size can seem to be a limitation to operating in the financial sector, it can be an important advantage because specializing as another SME or in retail services in order to provide a more similar service is seen as a positive way to attract SMEs to this sector [7]. Banks and, by extension, financial services companies are expected to approach climate risks and other risks related to sustainability in the same way that they approach any other financial risks [8].

The development of regulations in Europe to require sustainability reporting by financial services companies and obtain financial resources is under discussion, and recently a roadmap of regulation on taxonomy-related disclosures was launched by undertaking the reporting of nonfinancial information included in the European Commission’s Action Plan on financing sustainable growth [9]. European financial sector companies have their own regulatory and supervisory bodies that do not depend on their size in terms of national and international financial compliance, although groups of European listed companies are directly regulated by European Union–International Financial Reporting Standards (EU-IFRS). IFRS also include requirements on disclosure as a response to the need for high-quality standards in order to be endorsed in Europe. In this line, in 2018 the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) expanded its supervisory activities to nonfinancial information on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters assessing compliance with IFRS, and in 2019 it continued to focus on this disclosure. When speaking specifically about regulation of nonfinancial disclosure, large financial services companies are mainly considered entities of public interest in each Member State, which means that they are compulsorily required to disclose nonfinancial reporting according to Directive 2014/95/EU, although the specific requirements depend on its transposition by each Member State [1]. Hence, financial services SMEs that publish sustainability information do it voluntarily because they are not within the scope of the directive, and this field is not regulated.

Background information on the field of sustainability reporting of financial services SMEs is scarce and far from sufficient to develop requirements about it now when the European Commission is working on a review of nonfinancial reporting. Studying nonfinancial information is also difficult due to its mainly qualitative and narrative nature, which makes the information heterogeneous. Although most companies are using GRI standards, this does not suppose comparable homogeneous information.

3. Methodology

As the first goal of this paper is to point out the situation of sustainability reporting according to GRI voluntarily disclosed by European SMEs, we obtained the sample from the GRI database. Bearing in mind that GRI nonfinancial reporting standards are the most widely used all over the world and that SMEs in Europe are not compelled to issue this information, this database is a suitable resource to get these data. The search tool of the GRI database allows searches for nonfinancial reports according to firm size, and specifically reports issued by SMEs. We made our search on 11 November 2019 with the following criteria: firm size: SMEs; region: Europe; and report type: GRI-Standards. Although previous versions of the GRI standards are included in the report type, these are the latest ones, published by GRI on 1 July 2018, replacing the GRI 4 version (https://www2.globalreporting.org/standards/g4/Pages/default.aspx). In total, 116 organizations and 157 reports were found. This means that there are firms (or other types of organizations) that issued more than one report, because these standards refer to 2016, 2017, 2018, and even 2019. As shown in Table 1, there are many sectors in which SMEs that issue nonfinancial information operate.

Second, if we focus on the financial services sector, due to the specific features that we highlighted previously, we see that there are only 9 reports to analyze. Hence, there are 9 sustainability reports by European financial sector SMEs according to GRI, which supposes an important number of reports according to sector based on the breakdown in Table 1, and a percentage of reports (5.7%) important in comparing nearly all sectors, with the exception of real estate, nonprofit services, commercial services, and others. It was necessary to group the sectors in order to get higher percentages of sustainability reports.

4. Results and Conclusions

Our analysis is based on European SMEs included in the GRI database, hence the population of SMEs that voluntarily use GRI standards, although only between 10 and 15% of sustainability reports in the database from 2017–2018 came from SMEs [10]. Then we focused on European SMEs operating in the financial services sector. Bearing in mind their specific activity, sustainability reports by European financial sector SMEs represent an important percentage of reports in comparison with nearly all other sectors (5.7%).

The results obtained from the lexical analysis lead us to think that the answer to our first research question is yes, because there is no significant use of symbolic concepts in the narrative discourse in the reports analyzed, hence there is minimum compliance with nonfinancial requirements. Opposite results were obtained by the authors of [11] after applying lexicometric analysis to speeches delivered by European Central Bank presidents, although in this case we analyzed sustainability reporting.

Although initially it may be thought that sustainability reports are specific for each company, the broader corpus analysis suggests they were prepared similarly and used the same template [12], even more if it is pointed out that the four companies are in different countries and, although operating in financial services, are focused on different niches. As the sector is a strongly determinant variable of nonfinancial reporting [13][14][15], the analyzed reports follow the same pattern. Financial services companies not only operate in the same sector, but also have their own regulatory and supervisory bodies. So, in this case the sector is decisive in following the same financial trend in sustainability information, and as found in KPMG´s 2017 survey, financial services companies are in last place in corporate responsibility reporting [16].

These financial services companies are still imbued with traditional financial objectives and information. This means that finally what counts most in sustainable reports is financial information over nonfinancial, or at least the typical financial aspects of the business in this important sector are highlighted more through the language used. The analysis of the most frequent words in context shows that all financial terms are related to other financial terms. Hence, our second research question is supported. These results are the same as those obtained in previous studies, although in developing countries, based on financial services companies, because it is argued that the most important priorities of these enterprises are those directly related to their business operations [17].

Although a first view of sustainable reporting may show that companies try to exert more effort to increase the extent of their disclosure, the deep lexical analysis of these reports shows that the language used is not so extensive or rich, as some words are repeated many times, which highlights the problem of the lack of content in sustainability information. This shows evidence of the gap that still exists between financial and nonfinancial information and takes us to the same question posed by other researchers: “If it is like this for disclosing firms, what is happening in the case of nondisclosing firms?” [18].

Future research directions depend on an increase in nonfinancial reports, which will make it possible to get a bigger sample, more companies, and a longer period, because currently the most important limitation is the number of sustainability reports published according to GRI by European financial services SMEs. Another future research project involves using a proper sample of nonfinancial reports to describe and compare financial sector vs. nonfinancial sector SMEs and financial sector SMEs vs. large financial sector companies.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/su12208377


  1. Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 Amending Directive 2013/34/EU as Regards Disclosure of Non-Financial and Diversity Information by Certain Large Undertakings and Groups. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0095 (accessed on 20 May 2019).
  2. Lang, M.; Martin, R. The Trickle down Effect-IFRS and accounting by SMEs. European Federation of Accountants and Auditors for SMEs 2017. Available online: http://www.efaa.com/cms/upload/efaa_files/pdf/Publications/Articles/EFAA_Trickle_Down_WEB.pdf (accessed on 10 July 2020).
  3. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the Council, to the European Parliament, to the Committee of the Regions and to the European and Social Committee. An Action Plan to Improve Access to Finance for SMEs 2011. SEC (2011) 1527final. COM (2011) 870 Final. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0870:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed on 11 July 2020).
  4. Azofra Palenzuela, V.; López Iturriaga, F.J. La Asimetría Informativa En Los Mercados Financieros: ¿el Hallazgo De Un Nexo De Unión? An. Estud. Económicos Empresariales 1996, 11, 9–34.
  5. Asteriou, D.; Spanos, K. The relationship between financial development and economic growth during the recent crisis: Evidence from the EU. Financ. Res. Lett. 2019, 28, 238–245.
  6. Palacín-Sánchez, M.-J.; Canto-Cuevas, F.-J.; Di-Pietro, F. Trade credit versus bank credit: A simultaneous analysis in European SMEs. Small Bus. Econ. 2018, 53, 1079–1096.
  7. Glisovic, J.; Martínez, M. Financiamiento de Pequeñas Empresas: ¿Qué papel Desempeñan las Instituciones Microfinancieras? Available online: https://www.cgap.org/sites/default/files/CGAP-Focus-Note-Financing-Small-Enterprises-What-Role-for-Microfinance-Jul-2012-Spanish.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2020).
  8. Feridun, M.; Güngör, H. Climate-related prudential risks in the banking sector: A review of the emerging regulatory and supervisory practices. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5325.
  9. European Commission. Roadmap: Commission Delegated Regulation on Taxonomy-Related Disclosures by Undertakings Reporting Non-Financial Information. 2020. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12440-Commission-Delegated-Regulation-on-taxonomy-alignment-of-undertakings-reporting-non-financial-information (accessed on 30 July 2020).
  10. KPMG. The Road Ahead. The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. Available online: https://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2020).
  11. Morales, A. Uso de la Familia Léxica de Sovereignty en los Discursos de la Presidencia del Banco Central Europeo 2003–2016. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/53021 (accessed on 20 May 2020).
  12. D’Northwood, G.; Mundy, J. BP plc 2010—A case of linguistic legitimation? J. Appl. Account. Res. 2017, 18, 480–495.
  13. Xiao, J.Z.; Yang, H.; Chow, C.W. The determinants and characteristics of voluntary internet-based disclosures by listed Chinese companies. J. Account. Public Policy 2004, 23, 191–225.
  14. Oyelere, P.; Laswad, F.; Fisher, R. Determinants of internet financial reporting by New Zealand Companies. J. Int. Financ. Manag. Account. 2003, 14, 26–63.
  15. EFAMA. Asset Management in Europe. An Overview of the Asset Management Industry, 11th ed.; EFAMA: Brussels, Belgium, 2019; Available online: https://www.efama.org/Publications/Statistics/Asset%20Management%20Report/AssetManagementReport2019.pdf (accessed on 19 June 2020).
  16. Alonso, A.; Marqués, J.M. Innovación Financiera para una Economía Sostenible; Documentos Ocasionales; Banco de España: Madrid, Spain, 2019.
  17. Accountancy Europe. SME Risk Management: Sustainability. Factsheet July 2020. Available online: https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/publications/sme-risk-management-sustainability/ (accessed on 30 July 2020).
  18. Sohangir, S.; Petty, N.; Wang, D. Financial sentiment lexicon analysis. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), Laguna Hills, CA, USA, 31 January–2 February 2018; pp. 286–289.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!