Two main high voltage direct current (HVDC) technologies: line-commutated converters (LCC), also known as current-source converters (CSC) using thyristors, and voltage-source converters (VSC)-HVDC, using IGBT transistors, both are suitable for a wide range of applications.
The AC network is connected to the HVDC converter station by a converter busbar, represented by one or more typical AC busbars, to which the converter is connected [30,31].
In Figure 8, the basic structure of an HVDC substation in the case of CSC-HVDC is presented, and in Figure 9 the basic structure of VSC-HVDC is presented [31,32,33,34,35].
Figure 8. CSC-HVDC main components.
Figure 9. VSC-HVDC main components.
One of the main characteristics of HVDC technology is the ability to control the active power flow, both in terms of magnitude and direction. The flow of the active power can be controlled either by changing the DC voltage Ud or the DC current Id associated with the DC link [36,37,38].
Figure 10 shows the operating modes of the LCC converter either as an inverter or rectifier.
Figure 10. CSC-HVDC Converter operating modes.
The main control methods used in VSC-HVDC systems are the “power angle” control strategy and “vector current” control strategy [41].
“Power angle” control, also called “voltage angle”, is probably the most direct method possible for controlling VSC-HVDC links.
The basic principle of the “power angle” control method is the following: the active power is controlled by changing the phase angle θ of the voltage associated with the VSC-HVDC connection, while the reactive power is controlled by changing the magnitude of the voltage of the VSC-HVDC connection [41,42,43].
A simplified control scheme usually used for this strategy is presented in Figure 11 [41,42,43].
Figure 11. VSC-HVDC “power angle” control strategy.
In order to produce the tri-phase alternating voltage, the VSC-type device needs the following three control variables: magnitude, the phase angle, and the AC frequency. By using the “power angle” control method, the three variables are given by three different control loops, plus an additional synchronization loop, as follows [41,42,43].
The “vector-current” control strategy consists of controlling the current associated with the VSC–HVDC converter station. It was first used in variable speed drives, where the VSC is connected to an AC motor [41,42,43].
In the case of VSC-HVDC-type connections, the “vector-current” control strategy consists of the independent control of the active and reactive power by means of the following cascaded loops: external control loops and the inner current control loop.
Compared to the “power angle”-type control method, which uses as input quantities ΔV, θv, and ωt, by means of which the three-phase reference voltages of the VSC-HVDC converter are generated, the “vector current” control method works in a similar fashion, using as inputs the reference voltages in axis d and q are as follows: vrefd, vrefq, and ωt [41,42,43].
Figure 12. VSC-HVDC “vector current” control strategy.
The use of HVDC technology creates several issues, which need to be properly addressed:
The main issue regarding the implementation of circuit breakers (CB) in DC circuits is that there is no natural passage of fault current through zero, as in the case of classical AC systems. In DC circuits, the fault current can be brought to zero only by applying a higher counter voltage (Vb) than the operating voltage of the system [46].
A second problem is the need to dissipate a large amount of energy stored in the inductor of the DC line.
In order to solve those issues, a typical DC breaker arrangement is equipped with two additional circuits besides the main circuit breaker, an energy-absorbing circuit, and a commutating circuit [47,48].
The main types of DC circuit breakers are the following:
Given the rapid advancement of power electronics, a growing number of HVDC projects have been installed across the world. Their reliability and maintenance strategies have a direct influence on the system’s service security and, as a result, have a significant impact on network operation [55].
Recently, the emphasis has been on monitoring the operation of the converters in order to maintain proper operation. But due to the complexity of power converter structures and their degradation mechanisms, interpreting the information obtained by this technique (monitoring) is difficult, especially for non-experts [58,59].
The main future trends and applications of HVDC technology are the following:
The most used applications of HVDC technologies are summarized as the following: long-distance bulk power transmission, submarine cable transmission, asynchronous ties, offshore wind power plant transmission, and multi-terminal HVDC systems;
At the moment, the main types of HVDC topologies used are the monopolar link, bipolar link (both with metallic return conductor or ground return path), back-to-back link, and homopolar link;
The primary components of the HVDC converter stations are presented for both VSC technology (particularly the use of phase reactor and DC capacitors) and CSC technology (particularly the use of DC and AC filters);
The main control strategies and U-I characteristics used for CSC-HVDC control are summarized (CCR, CCI, CIA, and CEA). Also, the main strategies for VSC-HVDC (power angle and vector control strategies) are presented with the associated active and reactive power control loops and the PLL loop (phase-locked loop) implementation;
Furthermore, the following series of key challenges arising from the use of HVDC technologies are discussed: DC circuit breaker solutions (the main types of existing circuit breakers are as follows: electromechanical, solid-state, and hybrid circuit breakers are presented), reliability and maintenance of HVDC converter substation, multi-terminal operation;
The study also takes a look at the future trends and applications of HVDC technologies such as MMC, CTL converters, hybrid implementation of HVDC links, new types of bipolar topologies, and network stability improvement applications of HVDC technology.
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/en15031193