Gamified Waste Management Tool

Gamified Waste Management Tool: History

Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Subjects: Engineering, Chemical

Contributor:

Waste management is an increasingly visible and essential element to functioning civilization. However, while the theory of waste management is studied widely, waste management remains for many a difficult concept to understand. There is an opportunity to create an informative, easy-to-use simulator to help all types of individuals build an understanding of waste management and to evaluate the impact of various changes on waste management performance, particularly in the context of gamified tools.

waste management
gamified tools
gamification
Key Performance Indicators
Strategy Development
Simulation
Modelling
Environmental Performance
Unified Metrics
Urban Development
Green City

1. Introduction

Waste management is an increasingly visible and essential element to functioning civilization. It is a particularly critical area of study in addressing growing climate ^[1] and public health ^[2] crises, yet in-depth exploration of this important topic is often not feasible to the average person as knowledge barriers and challenges relating to data access hinder public education efforts. In truth, it is these “average” individuals who most contribute to these problems and—through behavioral changes—might best support their amelioration.

Increasing public awareness of challenges and opportunities in waste management has the potential to bring about significant positive change. However, while the theory of waste management is studied widely, and observational data from real, waste management remains for many a difficult concept to understand–particularly as far as drivers of change are concerned. For many, a lack of “hands on” data makes developing intuition difficult. For others, poor understanding of critical evaluative performance metrics makes it tough to understand what effect policies might have on waste generation and management.

Though tools have been developed to quantify waste management efficacy, and simulators have been built to allow individuals to “pull the levers” in a virtual environment to gauge their impact, these metrics and simulators are needlessly complex and therefore only serve a small audience. Existing simulations map inputs to performance indicators, requiring a complex setup to develop and adapt models for environments such as cities. This expertise requirement poses a barrier to knowledge that limits individuals’ understanding of waste management systems, whereas broader knowledge of waste management could contribute positively towards the creation of enhanced social policies and constituent engagement in an effort to reduce and manage waste.

There is an opportunity to create an informative, easy-to-use simulator to help all types of individuals build an understanding of waste management and to evaluate the impact of various changes on waste management performance, particularly in the context of gamified tools. Building an understanding of challenges and opportunities within a larger network has the potential to drive positive change in waste generation and management.

2. History

Within cities, large populations and small regional boundaries lead to significant accumulation of solid waste, making waste management—whether through reduction, reuse, or recycling—essential. While waste is typically undesirable, elements of its management can be made “fun” through the exploration of waste management techniques in games such as those related to city building. One such example is the SimCity franchise of games, which was first released in 1989 and has since witnessed four significant updates. Each version includes increasingly-advanced waste management features. Haupt, Arnold, and Bidlingmaier found that SimCity 3000 (1999) and SimCity 4 (2003) included infrastructure systems that were comparable to real-world cities and realistic enough to support research ^[3]^[4]. SimCity 4’s updated waste management system (elements of which are visible in Figure 1) is notable as the definitive version for research ^[4]. In this model, all waste created in the city fall are grouped together as “garbage”, though there are three different ways to dispose of the city’s waste: landfill, recycling, and energy conversion, with each having positive and negative associated attributes. Landfill is inexpensive when disposing of waste in small amounts, but it becomes expensive to maintain as the landfill reaches capacity—and residents find proximity to the dump undesirable. Recycling reduces the percentage of garbage relative to waste within the city, but may be cost-prohibitive. The waste-to-energy plant creates power for the city while eliminating significant waste, but it creates pollution and generates small amounts of power. SimCity 4 informs users of how well they manage the city’s waste through different reporting means, including the city’s desirability score and the user’s Mayor Rating (https://simcity.fandom.com/wiki/Mayor_rating, accessed on 13 December 2021), which both depend partially on how much garbage has piled up within the city. This rating varies from −100 to 100 and indicates citizens’ approval of the mayor based on policies enacted, decisions made, and city statistics. The metric provides a quick “gut check” for players to determine sentiment related to their policies comprising social, economic, and other factors in one key performance indicator.

Figure 1. Landfill and waste-to-energy plant are potential options for waste management in SimCity 4.

Other city-building games have been used for urban development and waste management research –Fernández and Ceacero-Moreno ^[5] tested Cities: Skylines (2015) to see if it met the standards necessary to train environmentalists with gamified training scenarios as well as to see if it was able to correctly identify and manage natural hazards that occurred in the city. Cities: Skylines was also tested and scored in waste management, as well as energy production, and health systems, and it was deemed sufficiently realistic to be used in gamified learning ^[5]. Cities: Skylines is like SimCity 4 in that it groups all types of waste as garbage, and all garbage can be treated or disposed of through various means. In Cities: Skylines (Figure 2), waste disposal options include a floating garbage collector for contaminated water, an incineration plant, a landfill site, a recycling center, an ultimate recycling plant, a waste disposal unit, a waste processing complex, and a waste transfer facility. These methods all have trade-offs, such as the waste disposal unit creating a small amount of energy in exchange for a lot of pollution. One notable way in which Cities: Skylines varies from SimCity is that some methods, such as the waste processing complex and the recycling center, produce recycled materials from the waste, providing users with incentive to buy into more expensive recycling methods. Every building in the city also has a garbage buildup meter showing how much garbage the building has and its remaining capacity. If a building fills up with garbage, users are informed of the need to empty the building lest it be abandoned. Research into both the SimCity franchise and Cities: Skylines shows that commercial games are realistic enough to be viable for use in gamified research and education, which makes their systems valuable to urban planning and waste management.

Figure 2. The Recycling Center, Incineration Plant, and Landfill Site are among the waste management options available to players of Cities: Skylines.

There have been recent research efforts to study the use of serious games in teaching and evaluating strategies for urban waste management. Wu and Huang created a waste management simulation game (Figure 3) that allows participants to control a city including its waste management, and see the ramifications of their decisions on the city ^[6]. Simulation users see waste accumulating in their city through a representative number of trashed 3D soda cans that litter the city’s streets if waste is not adequately managed. The effects of this waste are also communicated to users through “official reports”, which provide users with feedback and results related to their waste management choices, for example with one report informing users that the dogs in the city are getting sick as a result of consuming trash. Wu and Huang tested their waste management simulation on two subject groups, Taiwanese undergraduate students and Taiwanese elementary school students, and tracked both groups’ decisions relating to balancing economic growth and the ecological effects of increased pollutants. Their research found that the undergraduate students generally put more importance on economic growth while ignoring the negative effects on the environment, while the group of elementary school students tried to balance economic growth with limiting environmental pollution, leading to issues with untenable resource allocation in other areas. Both situations focus on a core concept in teaching waste management, notably that there must be compromise. A city may hire more waste management workers and build more garbage trucks, but that will come at a monetary and environmental cost—not to mention the need to sequester or otherwise dispose of the waste.

Figure 3. Wu and Huang’s Waste Management Simulation Game evaluated two groups’ planning decisions with respect to economic and environmental impact (Adapted with permission from Ref. ^[6]).

Wood of War is a serious game for waste management research created by Salazar et al. ^[7]. This game (Figure 4) uses mobile user data to identify areas with excessive solid waste build-up in Colima, Mexico throughout gameplay, and then compares these data to a map of areas in Colima, Mexico with significant amounts of rainfall to identify potential risk points where rain and trash could mix, blocking sewer drains and causing flooding. The game encourages players to go to these areas to destroy or dispose of enemies modeled to resemble sentient trash into piles of waste. Users are given extra points if they find a new area of excess waste and tag it using GPS for the developers ^[7]. This cycle of finding enemies in the real-world waste and finding trash-laden locations for more points-bearing enemies keeps game participation high and allows the developers to collect data valuable to local waste removal services ^[7]. Serious games like Wood of War can be specialized to a specific area of need like Colima, Mexico, where urbanization has been steadily growing in recent years while the waste management system is struggling to keep up with its urban population’s excess waste. The game identifies areas of importance for waste management officials to address such that associated negative externalities, such as flooding from blocked sewer drains, can be managed responsively. Understanding where waste build-up occurs most frequently by using the game’s data can also help officials build more efficient waste removal routes.

Figure 4. Wood of War encourages players to map trash by using real-world data to spawn trash monsters (Adapted with permission from Ref. ^[7]).

Other gamified software for waste management is the Multi-Agent-Based Modelling environment NetLogo ^[8] (Figure 5), developed in 1997 by Professor Uri Wilensky at the Center of Connected Learning(CCL) at Tufts University. This programmable software has been used in the modeling process in different areas including teaching, education, and research.

Figure 5. NetLogo was used to model and project waste management in the Norte Pioneiro region of Parana (Adapted with permission from Ref. ^[9]).

Eunice David Likotiko, Devotha Nyambo, and Joseph Mwangoka used NetLogo for the real-time simulation of waste management decisions. In the simulation, citizens are involved in optimizing the cost of waste collection services as well as providing decision algorithms to determine the best mobility for waste collections and bins. The authors’ model verified the optimal waste collection route, aiding the development of smart and innovative waste management systems and modeling for real life scenarios. Continuous empirical data and Geographical Information Systems(GIS) are proposed to be used for further model extensions ^[10].

Addressing sociotechnical aspects of waste management, Vitor Miranda de Souza et al. ^[9] used the dynamics of waste generation, disposal and collection to assess the eco-effectiveness of a solid waste management plan using NetLogo. The authors assessed the eco-effectiveness of Parana’s Norte Pioneiro region, forecasting waste generation, collection, and other waste management processes. Different population growth scenarios were simulated from 2020–2038, with different criteria analyzed to generate success metrics. This illustrates how NetLogo and similar ABMs may be used to inform socio-technical and socio-economic aspects of waste management plans as well as model the influence of policy ^[9].

Table 1. Comparison of waste grouping, disposal methods, notification methods, and use cases for Waste Management Systems in Gamified Tools and Commercial Games.

Commercial Games /Research Tools	Information about Waste Management Systems
SimCity 4	All waste lumped as “garbage”
	Multiple disposal avenues (Landfill, Recycling, Waste-to-Energy)
	Waste accumulation reported though desirability reports, Mayor Rating
Cities: Skylines	All waste lumped as “garbage”
	Multiple disposal avenues (Landfill, Recycling, Incinerator, Waste Processing, …)
	Waste accumulation reported though feedback bubbles
Wu and Huang’s Research Tool ^[6]	All waste lumped as “garbage”
	Multiple disposal avenues (Waste Product Dump, Incinerator, Environment Factory, Trading Companies)
	Waste accumulation reported though reports of garbage-driven natural disasters
Wood of War	Multiple waste monsters found with varied garbage piles
	Waste disposed of by defeating monsters Real-world waste reported through GPS tags
	Real-world waste build-up is communicated to developers, authorities
NetLogo	All waste types lumped
	Sociotechnical approach for complex waste management and decision-making
	Waste management parameters (agents) executed serially. Empirical calibration necessary to mirror real-world scenarios.

A clear opportunity remains to develop a tool that combines gamification and ease-of-use with robust simulation and easy-to-read performance metrics to provide a quick feedback loop relating to policy and other changes.

3. Current Status

The main scene is the interactive core of this application. It features an imaginary virtual city with population of 100,000 people that is comprised of nine areas laid out in a 3 × 3 matrix (Figure 7). Each area has unique and distinct parameters that may be randomly defined or tuned related to waste generation and management. When the main scene is loaded, the player camera moves from a close-up view to a top-down perspective to allow an overview of the entire city in a single window. From this top-down view, players are able to select and engage with the various interactive areas and elements of the city.

Upon loading the main scene, each area is automatically assigned with a random population number out of specific options. These options are 1500, 2000, 5000, 6500, 7000, 10,000, 18,000, 20,000, and 30,000 to sum to 100,000. The total population of 100,000 people helps to simplify calculations for the user. The graphics and the building models including houses do not reflect the numbers of the area population assigned but are representative and increase user engagement and relatability. In Figure 7, we see that the population of Area₁₁was automatically set to 2000 people by the tool. The rest areas were assigned with each area having the value of one of the remaining choices from the options list.

Figure 6. The Waste Management Tool’s main menu allows players to start the simulator, view the credits, or exit the game.

Figure 7. The Main Scene features a top-down view of the city, divided into nine parts. Each part can be highlighted, selected, and clicked to view information about waste management KPIs and policies in that region.

Having selected a specific area of the virtual city, the users may press the “Indicators” button on the right side of their screen. After doing so, a panel with the indicators (Figure 8) for the selected area appears. These indicators are the same KPIs that we have identified and presented in Section 3.

Figure 8. Key performance indicators for each region are shown on a dashboard to provide a high-level, easily interperable overview of waste management performance.

In this panel, the KPIs present new buttons that users can interact with. For illustrative purposes, we will explain how the first two indicators work. Starting with the Waste Compositional Analysis (MSW-C), this KPI is comprised of multiple configurable values each as described in Section 3.2.1. Using the amounts measured at Municipality of Paralimni and scaling up from 18,601 to 100,000 people for our simulator, we created Table 15 to display possible ranges in these categories for internal design purposes only. These amounts are scaled to fit each population option for all areas. The final bounds for each population option are presented in Table 16. These values are stored to an external and accessible file enabling easy customization in the case of new research developments necessitating specific game permutations.

Table 2. Waste Compositional Analysis categories for a population of 100,000 people and possible range in tn for each of the categories (figures per ^[13]). This table is used only for designing purposes and its amounts were later scaled to express the upper and lower bounds of each of the area population options.

Categories of Waste	Scaled Est. Amount (tn)	Range (tn)
PMD	7639	5000–10,000
Plastic Film	3588	2000–5000
Plastics Non-Recyclable	1835	1000–3000
Aluminium/Ferrous	682	500–1000
Paper	8572	6000–10,000
Glass	4327	3000–5000
Toilet and Kitchen Paper	9652	8000–11,000
Food Waste (edible)	12,055	10,000–14,000
Food Waste (inedible)	4091	3000–5000
Organic Waste (Green Waste, Yard Waste)	22,243	20,000–25,000
Others	6494	5000–7000

Table 3. The Lower and Upper Bounds for each of the categories for all population options. These values were scaled based on the range from Table 15.

	Population: 1500		Population: 2000		Population: 5000		Population: 6500		Population: 7000		Population: 10,000		Population: 18,000		Population: 20,000		Population: 30,000
	Lower Bound	Upper Bound	Lower Bound	Upper Bound	Lower Bound	Upper Bound	Lower Bound	Upper Bound	Lower Bound	Upper Bound	Lower Bound	Upper Bound	Lower Bound	Upper Bound	Lower Bound	Upper Bound	Lower Bound	Upper Bound
PMD	750	1500	100	200	250	500	325	650	350	700	500	1000	900	1800	1000	2000	1500	3000
Plastic Film	300	750	40	100	100	250	130	325	140	350	200	500	360	900	400	1000	600	1500
Plastic Non Recyclable	150	450	20	60	50	150	65	195	70	210	100	300	180	540	200	600	300	900
Aluminun/ Ferrous	75	150	10	20	25	50	32	65	35	70	50	100	90	180	100	200	150	300
Paper	900	1500	120	200	300	500	390	650	420	700	600	1000	1080	1800	1200	2000	1800	3000
Glass	450	750	60	100	150	250	195	325	210	350	300	500	540	900	600	1000	900	1500
Toilet and Kitchen paper	1200	1650	160	220	400	550	520	715	560	770	800	1100	1440	1980	1600	2200	2400	3300
Food Waste Edible	1500	2100	200	280	500	700	650	910	700	980	1000	1400	1800	2520	2000	2800	3000	4200
Food Waste Inedible	450	750	60	100	150	250	195	325	210	350	300	500	540	900	600	1000	900	1500
Organic Waste	3000	3750	400	500	1000	1250	1300	1625	1400	1750	2000	2500	3600	4500	4000	5000	6000	7500
Others	750	1050	100	140	250	350	325	455	350	490	500	700	900	1260	1000	1400	1500	2100

Similar to the area populations, the tool automatically loads the lower and upper bounds for the relevant population number. At the same time, it randomly sets a new value in the respective sliders for each category, creating a unique but broadly-similar city waste footprint for each user. A representative example for Area₁₁is showcased in Figure 9. Users may then choose to change these values.

Figure 9. Each area’s waste generation and policy parameters can be altered independently.

Next, we have the Municipal Solid Waste Production KPI (MSW-P). This KPI does not have any user-configurable categories and is completely independent of MSW-C. This value comes from the division of the total amount of waste divided by the population of the area.

Based on the tool’s randomly-generated amounts (Figure 9) and the population of Area₁₁, (2000), we have the following:

$\frac{Q_{T o t} (t)}{Q_{P O P} (t)} = \frac{159 + 93 + 46 + 19 + 148 + 96 + 163 + 240 + 99 + 418 + 105}{2000} = 0.793$

As we notice in Figure 10, the result is the same as the calculated one in Equation (15). This result can change in real time when a slider value from MSW-C panel is also changed.

Figure 10. Clicking each metric provides information about how it is calculated, which helps students learn to create effective management policies. These indicators reflect the parameters as identified in Section 3 (note that due to regional differences, the figure shows a comma rather than a period in the numeric text).

These examples are representative of how all models involved in the computation of waste production and management are handled in the game design.

Using these indicators, along with configurable elements thereof, allows individuals to use the game as a means of modelling waste generation and management. Through study and play, users may learn those metrics most affecting waste production and mitigation in order to inform effective policies for diverse scenarios.

With the game created and reflecting the model developed in Section 3, this tool will be used to enable a range of academic studies that will be the subject of future work. Ongoing work will conduct playtesting with diverse constituents, the feedback from which will be fed into a version of the game to be made freely available to researchers (please contact the authors for additional information).

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/modelling3010003

References

Ackerman, F. Waste management and climate change. Local Environ. 2000, 5, 223–229.
Seeberger, J.; Grandhi, R.; Kim, S.S.; Mase, W.A.; Reponen, T.; Ho, S.m.; Chen, A. Special report: E-waste management in the united states and public health implications. J. Environ. Health 2016, 79, 8–17.
Haupt, T.; Arnold, U.; Bidlingmaier, W. Studien-und Hochschulübergreifender Einsatz Einer Engl.-spr. Multimedialen Urban Infrastructure Development Simulation in der Akademischen Ausund Weiterbildung-MUrIDS (Cross-Study and Cross-University Use of an English Multimedia Urban Infrastructure Deve. Workshop: Multimedia in Bildung und Wirtschaft–Einsatz und Nachhaltigkeit von eLearning, Volume 22, p. 5. Available online: https://his-he.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Publikationen/Projektberichte_alte_Website/Hochschulplanung/hp165.pdf (accessed on 24 October 2021).
Arnold, U.; Söbke, H.; Reichelt, M. Simcity in infrastructure management education. Educ. Sci. 2019, 9, 209.
Fernández, P.; Ceacero-Moreno, M. Urban sustainability and natural hazards management; designs using simulations. Sustainability 2021, 13, 649.
Wu, K.C.; Huang, P.Y. Treatment of an Anonymous Recipient: Solid-Waste Management Simulation Game. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2015, 52, 568–600.
Lepe-Salazar, F.; Cortés-Álvarez, T.; Serratos-Chávez, E.; Jáuregui-Flores, L.; Juárez-Cervantes, E.; Valdovinos-López, R.; Rincón-Martínez, D.; la Madrid, R. A Game-Based Service to Mitigate the Risk of Inundations Caused by Solid Waste Accumulation. In Making Smart Cities More Playable: Exploring Playable Cities; Nijholt, A., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 279–299.
Wilensky, U. NetLogo. 1999. Available online: http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/ (accessed on 24 October 2021).
de Souza, V.M.; Bloemhof, J.; Borsato, M. Assessing the eco-effectiveness of a solid waste management plan using agent-based modelling. Waste Manag. 2021, 125, 235–248.
Likotiko, E.; Nyambo, D.; Mwangoka, J. Multi-Agent Based IoT Smart Waste Monitoring and Collection Architecture. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2017, 7, 1–14.
European Commission. Green City Accord Target Areas. 2021. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/green-cityaccord/monitoring-framework_en (accessed on 24 October 2021)
Loizia, P.; Voukkali, I.; Zorpas, A.A.; Navarro Pedreño, J.; Chatziparaskeva, G.; Inglezakis, V.J.; Vardopoulos, I.; Doula, M. Measuring the level of environmental performance in insular areas, through key performed indicators, in the framework of waste strategy development. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 753, 141974.
Zorpas, A.A.; Lasaridi, K.; Voukkali, I.; Loizia, P.; Chroni, C. Household waste compositional analysis variation from insular communities in the framework of waste prevention strategy plans. Waste Manag. 2015, 38, 3–11.
Zorpas, A.A.; Lasaridi, K.; Voukkali, I.; Loizia, P.; Chroni, C. Promoting Sustainable Waste Prevention Strategy Activities and Planning in Relation to the Waste Framework Directive in Insular Communities. Environ. Process. 2015, 2, 159–173.
Voukkali, I.; Loizia, P.; Navarro-Pedreño, J.; Zorpas, A.A. Urban strategies evaluation for waste management in coastal areas in the framework of area metabolism. Waste Manag. Res. J. Sustain. Circ. Econ. 2021, 39, 0734242X20972773.
Zorpas, A.A. Strategy development in the framework of waste management. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 716, 137088.
Sharp, V.; Giorgi, S.; Wilson, D.C. Methods to monitor and evaluate household waste prevention. Waste Manag. Res. 2010, 28, 269–280.
Vardopoulos, I.; Konstantopoulos, I.; Zorpas, A.A.; Limousy, L.; Bennici, S.; Inglezakis, V.J.; Voukkali, I. Sustainable metropolitan areas perspectives through assessment of the existing waste management strategies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 24305–24320.
Victor, P.A. Indicators of sustainable development: Some lessons from capital theory. Ecol. Econ. 1991, 4, 191–213. [CrossRef] 20. Green Dot Cyprus. Green National Household Results per Municipality per Year Cyprus. 2011. Available online: https: //greendot.com.cy/en/ (accessed on 24 October 2021).
Green Dot Cyprus. Green National Household Results per Municipality per Year Cyprus. 2011. Available online: https: //greendot.com.cy/en/ (accessed on 24 October 2021
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation. Off. J. Eur. Union 2003, 17–25.
Printing Office of the Republic of Cyprus. Packaging and Waste Packaging (Amendment) Law; (Law No. 159(I)/2005); Printing Office of the Republic of Cyprus: Nicosia, Cyprus, 2005.
Rhyner, C.; Schwartz, L.; Wenger, R.; Kohrell, M. Waste Management and Resource Recovery; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 1–528.
Luttenberger, L.R. Waste management challenges in transition to circular economy—Case of Croatia. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 256, 120495. 2020.120495.
Bhada-Tata, P.; Hoornweg, D. What a Waste?: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management. 2012. Available online: http: //hdl.handle.net/10986/17388 (accessed on 24 October 2021).
Kaza, S.; Yao, L.; Bhada-Tata, P.; Van Woerden, F. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; p. 292.
Alkalay, R.; Pasternak, G.; Zask, A. Clean-coast index—A new approach for beach cleanliness assessment. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2007, 50, 352–362.
Messineo, A.; Panno, D. Municipal waste management in Sicily: Practices and challenges. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 1201–1208.
Loizia, P.; Voukkali, I.; Chatziparaskeva, G.; Navarro-Pedreño, J.; Zorpas, A.A. Measuring the Level of Environmental Performance on Coastal Environment before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study from Cyprus. Sustainability 2021, 12, 2485.
Ghorani azam, A.; Riahi-Zanjani, B.; Balali-Mood, M. Effects of air pollution on human health and practical measures for prevention in Iran. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2016, 21, 65.
Zarate, E. Understanding the Origins and Fate of Air Pollution in Bogotá, Colombia. 2007. Available online: https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/100037 (accessed on 24 October 2021
Ho, B. Urban Air Pollution; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012.
Hogg, D.; Ballinger, A. The Potential Contribution of Waste Management to a Low Carbon Economy; Eunomia Research & Consulting Ltd.: Bristol, UK, 2015.
Department of Labour Inspection (DLI) of the Ministry of Labour; Insurance, S. Air Quality in Cyprus. Available online: https://www.airquality.dli.mlsi.gov.cy/ (accessed on 24 October 2021).
Pisoni, E.; Christidis, P.; Thunis, P.; Trombetti, M. Evaluating the impact of “Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans” on urban background air quality. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 231, 249–255.
Kasten, P.; Bracker, J.; Haller, M.; Purwanto, J. Assessing the Status of Electrification of the Road Transport Passenger Vehicles and Potential Future Implications for the Environment and European Energy System; Öko-Institut: Darmstadt, Germany, 2016.
De la Barrera, F.; Reyes-Paecke, S.; Banzhaf, E. Indicators for green spaces in contrasting urban settings. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 62, 212–219.
Gerstenberg, T.; Hofmann, M. Perception and preference of trees: A psychological contribution to tree species selection in urban areas. Urban For. Urban Green. 2015, 15, 103–111.
European Commission. Building a Green Infrastructure for Europe; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg; Brussels, Belgium, 2013; p. 22
World Health Organisation(WHO). Health Indicators of Sustainable Cities in the Context of the Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
Russo, A.; Cirella, G. Modern Compact Cities: How Much Greenery Do We Need? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2180.
Delponte, I.; Schenone, C. RES Implementation in Urban Areas: An Updated Overview. Sustainability 2020, 12, 382.
European Commission. Resolution of the European Committee of the Regions—The Green Deal in partnership with local and regional authorities. In Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The European Council, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions the European Green Deal; Number COM(2019) 640 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium; Luxembourg, 2019; p. 24.
Zorpas, A.A.; Saranti, A. Multi-criteria analysis of sustainable environmental clean technologies for the treatment of winery’s wastewater. Int. J. Glob. Environ. Issues 2016, 15, 151–168.
Cyprus, T.S.O. Transmission System Operator Cyprus. 2020. Available online: https://tsoc.org.cy/electrical-system/energy-gen eration-records/res-penetration/ (accessed on 24 October 2021).
Regu, C.E. Cyprus Energy Regulatory Authority. 2021. Available online: https://www.cera.org.cy/en-gb/smv/sp-graph (accessed on 24 October 2021).
Republic of Cyprus, Statistical Service, Ministry of Finance. Demographic Statistics 2019. 2019. Available online: https://www.mof.gov.cy/mof/cystat/statistics.nsf/populationcondition_21main_en/populationcondition_21main_en ?OpenForm&sub=1&sel=1 (accessed on 24 October 2021)
European Commission. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources (Recast) (Text with EEA Relevance)Text with EEA Relevance; Technical Report; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium; Luxembourg, 2018.
Pesqueira, J.F.J.R.; Pereira, M.F.R.; Silva, A.M.T. Environmental impact assessment of advanced urban wastewater treatment technologies for the removal of priority substances and contaminants of emerging concern: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 261, 121078.
European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A Policy Framework for Climate and Energy in the Period from 2020 to 2030; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium; Luxembourg, 2014.
European Commission. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions- Tenth Report on the Implementation Status and Programmes for Implementation (as required by Article 17 of Coun; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium; Luxembourg, 2016.
World Health Organisation (WHO). Population Connected to Wastewater Treatment Facilities. 2015. Available online: https: //gateway.euro.who.int/en/indicators/enhis_4-population-connected-to-wastewater-treatment-facilities/ (accessed on 24 October 2021).
Eurostat. Population Connected to Wastewater Treatment Plants. 2018. Available online: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/n ui/show.do?dataset=env_ww_con&lang=en (accessed on 24 October 2021).
Niccolucci, V.; Botto, S.; Rugani, B.; Nicolardi, V.; Bastianoni, S.; Gaggi, C. The real water consumption behind drinking water: The case of Italy. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 2611–2618.
European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Closing the Loop—An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy; Number COM(2015) 614 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium; Luxembourg, 2015.
Nations, U. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online: https://sdgs.un.or g/2030agenda (accessed on 24 October 2021).
Mohanty, S. Everything You Wanted to Know About Smart Cities. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 2016, 5, 60–70.
Stambouli, A.B.; Khiat, Z.; Flazi, S.; Kitamura, Y. A review on the renewable energy development in Algeria: Current perspective, energy scenario and sustainability issues. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 4445–4460.
Petinrin, J.O.; Shaaban, M. Renewable energy for continuous energy sustainability in Malaysia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 50, 967–981.
Calisto Friant, M.; Vermeulen, W.J.V.; Salomone, R. Analysing European Union circular economy policies: Words versus actions. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 337–353.
Wittmaier, M.; Langer, S.; Sawilla, B. Possibilities and limitations of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the development of waste utilization systems—Applied examples for a region in Northern Germany. Waste Manag. 2009, 29, 1732–1738.
Brook Lyndhurst. WR1204 Household Waste Prevention Evidence Review: L1 m1—Executive Report, a Report for Defra’s Waste and Resources Evidence Programme; Technical Report; Brook Lyndhurst: London, UK, 2009.
Shi, Y.; Ge, X.; Yuan, X.; Wang, Q.; Kellett, J.; Li, F.; Ba, K. An Integrated Indicator System and Evaluation Model for Regional Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2183.
Strzebkowski, R.; Gehrmann, T.; Siegel, J.E.; Politopoulos, K.; Christodoulides, C.; Pappas, G. AR/VR/Game-based Edutainment Applications and Real-Time Data Visualisation Technologies for Discovery Learning in the Industry and Distance Education; OEB: Berlin, Germany, 2018.
Avraamidou, A.; Lambis, S.; Pappas, G.; Christodoulides, C. Enhancing Distance Education Students’ Learning Experience Through Emerging Technologies. In Proceedings of the INTED2019 Proceedings, Valencia, Spain, 11–13 March 2019; Volume 1, pp. 3022–3029.
Pappas, G.; Peratikou, P.; Siegel, J.E.; Politopoulos, K.; Christodoulides, C.; Stavrou, S. Cyber Escape Room: An educational 3D escape room game within a cyber range training realm. In Proceedings of the INTED2020 Proceedings, 14th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain, 2–4 March 2020; pp. 2621–2627.
Pappas, G.; Siegel, J.E.; Vogiatzakis, I.; Politopoulos, K. Gamification and the Internet of Things in Education. In Handbook of Intelligent Techniques in Educational Process; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022.
Pappas, G.; Siegel, J.E.; Politopoulos, K. VirtualCar: Virtual Mirroring of IoT-Enabled Avacars in AR, VR and Desktop Applications. 2018. Available online: https://diglib.eg.org/handle/10.2312/egve20181381 (accessed on 24 October 2021).
Pappas, G.; Siegel, J.E.; Politopoulos, K.; Sun, Y. A Gamified Simulator and Physical Platform for Self-Driving Algorithm Training and Validation. Electronics 2021, 10, 1112.
Siegel, J.E. Cloudthink and the Avacar: Embedded Design to Create Virtual Vehicles for Cloud-Based Informatics, Telematics, and Infotainment. S.M. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013.
Wilhelm, E.; Siegel, J.E.; Mayer, S.; Sadamori, L.; Dsouza, S.; Chau, C.K.; Sarma, S.E. Cloudthink: A scalable secure platform for mirroring transportation systems in the cloud. Transport 2015, 30, 320–329.
Siegel, J.E. Data Proxies, the Cognitive Layer, and Application Locality: Enablers of Cloud-Connected Vehicles and Next,Generation Internet of Things. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016.
Siegel, J.E.; Bhattacharyya, R.; Deshpande, A.; Sarma, S.E. Vehicular engine oil service life characterization using on-board diagnostic (OBD) sensor data. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors 2014, Valencia, Spain, 2–5 November 2014; pp. 1722–1725.
Siegel, J.E.; Bhattacharyya, R.; Deshpande, A.; Sarma, S.E. Smartphone-Based Wheel Imbalance Detection. In Proceedings of the Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, Columbus, OH, USA, 28–30 October 2015.
Siegel, J.E.; Kumar, S.; Ehrenberg, I.; Sarma, S.E. Engine misfire detection with pervasive mobile audio. In Proceedings of the Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Riva del Garda, Italy, 19–23 September 2016; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 226–241.
Siegel, J.E.; Bhattacharyya, R.; Deshpande, A.; Sarma, S.E. Smartphone-Based Vehicular Tire Pressure and Condition Monitoring. In Proceedings of the SAI Intelligent Systems Conference, London, UK, 21–22 September 2016; pp. 446–455.
Siegel, J.E.; Bhattacharyya, R.; Kumar, S.; Sarma, S.E. Air filter particulate loading detection using smartphone audio and optimized ensemble classification. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2017, 66, 104–112.
Siegel, J.E.; Sun, Y.; Sarma, S.E. Automotive Diagnostics as a Service: An Artificially Intelligent Mobile Application for Tire Condition Assessment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on AI and Mobile Services, Seattle, WA, USA, 25– 30 June 2018.
Siegel, J.E.; Coda, U.; Terwilliger, A. Surveying Off-Board and Extra-Vehicular Monitoring and Progress Towards Pervasive Diagnostics. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2007.03759.
Pappas, G.; Siegel, J.E.; Rutkowski, J.; Schaaf, A. Game and Simulation Design for Studying Pedestrian-Automated Vehicle Interactions. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2109.15205.
Siegel, J.E.; Kumar, S.; Sarma, S.E. The Future Internet of Things: Secure, Efficient, and Model-Based. IEEE Internet Things J. 2017, 5, 2386–2398.
Kumaravel, B.T.; Bhattacharyya, R.; Siegel, J.E.; Sarma, S.E.; Arunachalam, N. Development of an Internet of Things enabled manufacturing system for tool wear characterization. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 3rd International Symposium in Robotics and Manufacturing Automation (ROMA), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 19–21 September 2017; pp. 1–6.
Siegel, J.E.; Beemer, M.F.; Shepard, S.M. Automated non-destructive inspection of fused filament fabrication components using thermographic signal reconstruction. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 31, 100923.
Sen, P.; Kantareddy, S.N.R.; Bhattacharyya, R.; Sarma, S.E.; Siegel, J.E. Low-cost diaper wetness detection using hydrogel-based RFID tags. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 3293–3302.

© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.