Airborne Chemical Exposure and Ocular Surface Irritation: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In our recent paper "An Assessment of the Ocular Toxicity of Two Major Sources of Environmental Exposure" we discuss the impact on the eye of specific chemicals released from burn pits and from the East Palestine, Ohio train derailment. This entry discusses the importance of investigating the nature and consequences of these exposures in hopes of raising awareness of an underrecognized health issue.   

  • ocular surface disease
  • environmental exposure
  • tear film
  • airborne chemical
  • dry eye disease

There are many chemical released into the atmosphere that can harm the eye. In our recent paper[1] , we focus on the harmful compounds found in smoke from military burn pits and from the East Palestine Ohio train derailment of February 3, 2023. Advanced Chemistry Development ( ACD) Labs ( Ontario, Canada) used in silico methods to determine ocular irritation to chemical compounds. A list of such chemicals was introduced for burn pits and the train derailment. Results demonstrated high ocular irritation scores for some chemicals present in these exposure events. The results reflect the first effort to relate an environmental event to ocular surface disease using an in silico chemical analysis platform. The chemicals released into the air surrounding an environmental exposure can be objectively defined. This is one method of examining potential danger. Ocular surface disease, most notably dry eye disease, may not be a high priority concern in light of the carcinogenic and vital organ toxicity of many chemicals, but it has consequences for quality of life, performance of work activities and ocular pain[2] [3][4]. It also carries a considerable economic burden[5].[6] 

It is too expensive and impractical to study a cohort of patients with sequential eye exams after a chemical exposure to determine whether there is a relationship between the exposure and long-term consequences. Thus, in examining the literature, we found no long-term studies investigating the outcomes for those individuals with post-exposure persistent eye irritation from either burn pits or the derailment or other incidents. This is the case despite the estimated 3.5 million troops who have been in the presence of burn pits[7][8] . Thus, our approach is to evaluate the probability that specific chemicals can influence the occurrence of inflammation, dry eyes and prolonged symptoms. It is within our ability to implement this type of assessment so that the eyes are not ignored in a comprehensive health evaluation following an exposure. 

Dry eye disease occurs when the integrity of the tear film is disrupted, leading to inflammation and a cascade of consequences that can ultimately affect vision[9][10]. Simple treatment such as use of lubricants is often inadequate since this approach does not address tissue injury. Ongoing symptoms are the hallmark of chronic dry eye disease and some of these patients do not just suffer brief eye irritation, but long lasting chronic incapacity. These patients are not without hope since there are multiple FDA approved prescription drugs in addition to non-prescription artificial tears to treat dry eyes.

Our goal is to alert the ophthalmology community that future chemical spills may play a significant role in a given patient’s ocular health. Emphasizing the link to specific chemicals is the first step to a more exhaustive analysis.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijerph21060780

References

  1. Steven H. Rauchman; Lora J. Kasselman; Ankita Srivastava; Joshua De Leon; Allison B. Reiss; An Assessment of the Ocular Toxicity of Two Major Sources of Environmental Exposure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2024, 21, 780, .
  2. Alexia Vereertbrugghen; Jeremías G. Galletti; Corneal nerves and their role in dry eye pathophysiology. Exp. Eye Res. 2022, 222, 109191, .
  3. Joseph R. Jr Grubbs; Sue Tolleson-Rinehart; Kyle Huynh; Richard M. Davis; A Review of Quality of Life Measures in Dry Eye Questionnaires. Cornea 2014, 33, 215-218, .
  4. Priya M Mathews; Pradeep Y Ramulu; Bonnielin S Swenor; Canan A Utine; Gary S Rubin; Esen K Akpek; Functional impairment of reading in patients with dry eye. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 101, 481-486, .
  5. Masakazu Yamada; Yoshinobu Mizuno; Chika Shigeyasu; Impact of dry eye on work productivity. Clin. Outcomes Res. 2012, 4, 307-312, .
  6. Fiona Stapleton; Juan Carlos Abad; Stefano Barabino; Anthea Burnett; Geetha Iyer; Kaevalin Lekhanont; Tianjing Li; Yang Liu; Alejandro Navas; Chukwuemeka Junior Obinwanne; et al. TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of societal challenges on the ocular surface. Ocul. Surf. 2023, 28, 165-199, .
  7. David A. Savitz; Susan R. Woskie; Anila Bello; Rachel Gaither; Joseph Gasper; Lan Jiang; Christopher Rennix; Gregory A. Wellenius; Amal N. Trivedi; Deployment to Military Bases With Open Burn Pits and Respiratory and Cardiovascular Disease. JAMA Netw. Open 2024, 7, e247629-e247629, .
  8. Xinyu Wang; Taylor A. Doherty; Christine James; Military burn pit exposure and airway disease. Ann. Allergy, Asthma Immunol. 2023, 131, 720-725, .
  9. Steven H. Rauchman; Brandon Locke; Jacqueline Albert; Joshua De Leon; Morgan R. Peltier; Allison B. Reiss; Toxic External Exposure Leading to Ocular Surface Injury. Vis. 2023, 7, 32, .
  10. Srinivas K. Rao; Rishi Mohan; Nikhil Gokhale; Himanshu Matalia; Paras Mehta; Inflammation and dry eye disease—where are we?. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 15, 820-827, .
More
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service