Two or more thermodynamically incompatible polymer blocks with diverse physical and chemical properties are covalently bonded together to form so-called block copolymers (BCPs) [1]. In the 1950s, the discovery of the surfactant Pluronic (PEO-b-PPO-b-PEO) ^[2][3][4][2,3,4] first attracted the attention of scientists. The mass production of BCP received a boost in 1956 due to the invention of living anionic polymerization [5]. Subsequently, other controlling polymerization techniques can also be used to synthesize BCP, such as living cationic polymerization [6], atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) ^{[7][8][9][10][11]}[7,8,9,10,11], and reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization (RAFT) ^[12][13][12,13]. Edwards’ self-consistent field theory (SCFT) [14] provided a premium theoretical tool for posterior simulations to explore the phase behavior of BCP. The foundations laid by these pioneers ^[15][16][15,16] have greatly facilitated the advancement of materials science, technology, and theory [17]. The chemical properties of various BCP blocks tend to vary with amenability to addition. To exploit the controllable properties of BCP, scientists have combined theoretical derivation with experimental practice to modify the structure of BCP for desired applications. This requires a thorough understanding of the factors that govern the nanostructure of BCP to regulate it according to the actual needs.

The BCP system can stand out and become the focus of research due to its incomparable self-assembly ability [18], and BCP can undergo accurate microphase separation in the range of 10–100 nm, which expands a new method to prepare nanodevices. The self-assembly of BCP forms rich nanostructures due to the difference in structure, block ratio, and sequences [19]. Surface structure and nanostructure are the keys to improving the properties in applications such as electronic lithography [20], organic photovoltaics [21], nanofiltration [22], and ultrafiltration [23], where electron transport or surface features dictate the performance of the devices. BCP has the potential to boost the properties of these nanodevices [24], which can result in their flourishing applications in different areas due to unique nanoscale customizable template nanostructures [25]. ReThisearchers review intends to highlight the effective exploitation and performance enhancement of BCP for novel energy sources instead of repeating the aforementioned applications. Researchers'  Our main focus will be on the construction and application of BCP-based nanostructured materials in mass transport for energy conversion. The massive exploitation and usage of nonrenewable resources, such as oil and coal, has become a burden on the environment [26]. In recent years, global warming has been responsible for frequent natural disasters ^[27][28][27,28], which have resulted in an irresistible surge to limit the traditional energy methods that incur huge carbon emissions and foster innovative and efficient clean energy sources. Concentration cells, fuel cells, and rechargeable batteries that can convert chemical energy into electricity without carbon emissions are new energy sources with the potential to replace traditional energy sources in the foreseeable future [29]. Using membranes for mass transportation is a key part to obtain high power efficiency from the cells of these devices related to new energy conversion processes [30], which makes the development of a high-performance battery diaphragm very important.

2. Microphase Separation of Block Copolymer

Spontaneous phase separation occurs in BCP due to repulsion between chemically and thermodynamically incompatible blocks. At the macroscopic scale, the phase separation between blocks cannot occur due to the presence of covalent bonds between the blocks of BCP [31]. Instead, in the macromolecular-length scale, phase separation can only occur at the microscopic scale, i.e., microphase separation [32]. Due to the microphase separation, there is structural arrangement of BCP at the macroscopic scale, which is known as the self-assembly phenomenon [33] and responsible for the generation of new boundaries between blocks and can result in various assembly structures. Three significant parameters are responsible for the microphase separation between the blocks: (1) the relative volume fraction f of each block, which is used to characterize the microscopic composition of BCP; (2) the Flory–Huggins parameter χ, which is used to characterize the interaction between the blocks ^[34][35][34,35] and is inversely proportional to the temperature change; (3) the total degree of polymerization N of the polymer. Among them, χN, which represents the phase separation strength, plays a decisive function in the separation state of BCP [36]. Increasing the temperature or decreasing χN gradually decreased the incompatibility between the blocks. Molecular-level mixing changes polymeric molecular chain from the stretched chain state with obvious interfaces and ordered arrangement to the disordered Gaussian chain state, as shown in Figure 1a, which results in an order-to-disorder transition (ODT) [37] of the polymer. The critical χN value for the occurrence of ODT is approximately 10.5. Electron microscopy can be used to clearly observe the ODT transition process of some BCPs with lower molecular weights, as shown in Figure 1b, which shows TEM images of poly(styrene)-b-poly(imide) (PS-b-PI) before and after undergoing the ODT process. Due to the introduction of new theories such as the thermal up-and-down effect and mean-field theory, the improved self-consistent field theory (SCFT) can more accurately calculate the BCP phase behavior by scientists [38]. The theoretical phase diagram of the AB diblock copolymer [39] based on self-consistent mean-field (SCMF) theory showing the changes in phase behavior with increasing or decreasing values of f_A and χN in a concrete manner is shown in Figure 1c (left). However, the experimental phase diagram deviates from the theoretical phase diagram because there are various practical and objective factors. Figure 1c (right) shows the experimental phase diagram of the PI-b-PS copolymer obtained by Bates et al. Both experimental and theoretical phase diagrams of PI-b-PS are qualitatively consistent with the variation occurring on the quantitative scale. First, the critical χN value for ODT is approximately 20, with the loss of symmetry for the phase diagram at approximately f_A = 1/2. Instead of the CPS phase, a mesostable porous lamellar PL phase appears between C and L regions (calculations confirmed the mesostability of this phase later on). The difference in the PI and PS blocks from the theoretically assumed AB blocks is the main reason behind these deviations. The molecular morphology, properties, and interactions between PI and PS are responsible for the difference in experimental and theoretical values. In the experimental phase diagram, the ODT transitions can directly proceed in both the disordered D region and ordered regions that only occur at the critical point in the theoretical phase diagram, and this phenomenon can be mainly attributed to the effect of the thermal up-and-down phenomenon. With an increasing number of blocks, the phase behavior of block copolymers becomes more complicated ^[40][41][42][40,41,42].

3. Regulation of the Self-Assembled Structure of the Block Copolymer

3.1. Influence of the Molecular Structure on the Self-Assembled Structure

The structural morphology of BCP films is theour main interest. The self-assembly of BCP film is affected by many factors ^[43][44][45][43,44,45] which can be divided into molecular structure factors and assembly condition factors. The most fundamental strategy to regulate the nanoscale morphology of BCP is to adjust its molecular structure, since the BCP structure determines the self-assembly properties. Above the ODT transition curve, the thermodynamically stable nanostructures of BCP mainly consist of spherical S, cylindrical C, bicontinuous gyroidal G, and lamellar L geometries. As shown in Figure 2a, a change in volume fraction f of the AB block changes the morphology of the AB diblock copolymer [46]. Depending on whether f_A < 0.5 or f_B < 0.5, block A is dispersed within the continuous phase composed of block B or vice versa, and with increasing f_A, the transformation of S→C→G→L occurs, while the same S’→C’→G’→L transition occurs with increasing f_B. The size of each block in each form is determined by the molecular weight and compatibility of the blocks. With increasing molecular weight of the polymer, the blocks become segregated with increasing distance between the domains, and these factors make it challenging to undertake studies of high molecular weight BCPs [47]. The structure of BCP is also characterized by an essential parameter known as polydispersity index (PDI) [48] of molecular weight, which is calculated as PDI = M_n/M_w [49]. The BCPs obtained from the polymerization of reactive anions are monodisperse [50]. However, in recent years, with the emergence of novel methods for synthesizing BCPs, most of the obtained BCPs have been polydisperse [51]. It is necessary to study the effect of broadening the molecular-weight distribution on the phase behavior of BCPs. With the concept of maintaining thermodynamic equilibrium to the maximum possible intent, Ruzette et al. [52] investigated the self-assembly behavior of triblock copolymer ABA with varying molecular-weight distributions, with narrower dispersion of block B (poly (butyl acrylate) (PBA)) and wider dispersion of block A (poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)). The resulting transparent BCP membranes are homogeneous. The TEM characterization reveals the possibility of forming classical S, C, G, and L structures. However, a highly curved interface between the blocks and the PMMA block was formed mainly due to the shift of the interface to release the stretching energy of the molecular chains. Lynd et al. [53] investigated the effect of molecular-weight distribution on the occurrence of ODT for two different BCPs prepared of polydispersed poly (ethylene-acrylamide)-b-poly (DL-propyleneglycol) (PL) and polystyrene-b-polyisoprene (SI). Ultimately, during the occurrence of ODT, increasing polydispersity in blocks with fewer (f < 0.5) or more (f > 0.5) components decrease or increase in the critical χN value, respectively. Widin et al. [54] reported the structural effects of a low-dispersion block polystyrene (PS) and a high-dispersion block polybutylene (PB) on the triblock copolymer SBS. As shown in Figure 2b (left), the molecular chain of highly dispersive block PB is stabilized by the low dispersive PS block in the middle position. Finally, similar experimental results to those of Ruzette were obtained, where the phase separation interface was bent toward the polydisperse segment because the polydisperse block has a smaller filling volume than the monodisperse block of the same molecular weight (the phase interface bending process is shown in Figure 2b (right)). The polydisperse B-block also reduces the critical χN value for ODT and increases the position of the lamellar phase window. The investigations show that by playing with the polydispersity of a particular block in BCP, the microphase separation state of BCP and its thermodynamic stability can be regulated.

3.2. Influence of Assembly Conditions on the Self-Assembled Structure

Normally, in addition to the interactions between polymer molecules, external film formation conditions can also affect the nanostructure. Hence, the type of solvent, polymer solution concentration, nonsolvent, additives, and external field conditions during the film formation process can affect the structure of BCP.

3.2.1. Solvents to Prepare the Membranes and Self-Assembly

The selectivity of solvents toward different blocks significantly affect the self-assembled structures. Hanley et al. [55] dissolved PS-b-PI in bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DOP), which is a nonselective solvent for PS and PI, di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), and diethyl phthalate (DEP) solvents, which are sequentially more selective for the PS block, and tetradecane (C14), which is a selective solvent for the PI blocks, to observe their phase behavior by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) (Figure 3a). The PS-b-PI membrane exhibited the transformation of G→hexagonal filled C→D, which, when dissolved in different solvents, exhibited different nanostructures. After dissolution in DBP, the phase transition process of PS-b-PI was L→G’→C’→S’. The phase behavior in DEP, which is more selective for PS, like DBP, was similar to that of DBP but with higher T_ODT. In contrast, in C14, for the PI selective solvent, the G’→C’→S’ ordered phases were the only occurring transitions because enhancement of segregation between microdomains by the selective solvents improve the stability of the ordered phase, which results in the appearance of more ordered phase behavior. The formation and closure of pores in BCP nanostructures can also be regulated by selective solvents [56]. The spontaneously formed poly(styrene)-b-poly (2-vinyl pyridine) (PS-b-P2VP) membrane is a dense, nonporous film. However, when dissolved in P2VP selective solvent (e.g., ethanol), the P2VP blocks dissolve to form a membrane with round or elliptical pores surrounding the core of the PS blocks. With increasing time or temperature, these pores grow into a columnar network and finally form three-dimensional interconnected pores. This pore formation process is often reversible, and immersion of the porous membrane in a PS block selective solvent (e.g., cyclohexane) closes the pores to restore the dense, nonporous membrane. In addition, dissolution of the self-assembled structure of BCPs in mixed solvents should be explored. Yi et al. [57] investigated the nanostructure of poly(styrene)-b-poly (4-vinyl pyridine) (PS-b-P4VP) by adding it to N, N-dimethylformamide, DMF, (selective for P4VP block, and slow volatilization), tetrahydrofuran, THF, (selective for PS, faster volatilization), and their mixtures. In pure DMF solvent, a nanoscale spherical structure was obtained for PS-b-P4VP, a dense and smooth surface was obtained in pure THF, while the mixed solvent yielded a rod-like aggregated structure where the diameter of the nanospheres was similar to that observed in DMF. When polymers are dissolved in a mixture of solvents with different solubilities and volatilities, the preferential evaporation of one solvent leads to a concentration gradient within the BCP. This concentration gradient leads to phase separation of the BCP, the so-called evaporation-induced phase separation (EIPS) [58] of the solvent. In addition, the concentration of the polymer solution is an important factor that affects the nanostructure of BCP. Jiang et al. [59] was the first to simulate the membrane formation of a double hydrophobic poly(styrene)-b-poly (methyl methacrylate) (PS-b-PMMA). The effect of the polymer concentration on the morphology of polymer molecules was also investigated in the polymer concentration range of 10–55%. Figure 3b clearly shows the difference in morphologies corresponding to different polymer concentrations. For low polymer concentrations, microphase separation just begins to occur, and the formation of a continuous phase in the system under this condition is not possible because there is not a sufficient BCP concentration, which forms a spherical structure at lower concentrations. With increasing polymer concentration, a structure can be observed because a continuous phase forms by BCP. With a further increase in concentration, porous membranes with elliptical pores start to form. When the concentration increases to approximately 30%, the elliptical pores change to circular pores. From there on, a further increase in polymer concentration only decreases the pore size within the porous membrane and membrane wall thickening. When the polymer concentration reaches approximately 45%, the polymer shows an irregular sponge-like, cross-linked structure, and finally, a continued increase in polymer concentration causes the pores to plug and results in a continuous structure of the polymer. This experiment indicates that, within a certain concentration range, the polymer concentration can be adjusted to achieve different polymer morphologies and obtain porous membranes with ideal pore size and stability. Formation of the BCP membrane by selective solvents requires three steps: solvent uptake, swelling, and solvent evaporation drying. The effects of the first two steps on the BCP have been described in the previous section, while the evaporation rate of the solvent has been found to affect the structural orientation of BCP. It has been proven that fast solvent evaporation leads to a vertical orientation of the internal structure [60], while slower solvent evaporation rates cause parallel structural orientation or structures with mixed orientation [61]. The evaporation rate determines the propagation of phase separation from the membrane surface to the interior. Similar conclusions were obtained by Phillip et al. [62] when comparing the morphology of poly(styrene)-b-poly (D, L-lactide) (PS-b-PLA) under rapid solvent evaporation and slow evaporation (Figure 3c). Because ultrafast solvent evaporation makes steep concentration gradients rapidly propagate the vertical direction of the membrane surface, the cylindrical structure orients along the surface’s normal direction. During the self-assembly process via solvent vapor annealing (SVA), the solvents are found to have a significant influence. For a given polymer system, the choice of different solvents can result in different nanostructures ^[63][64][65][63,64,65]. Peng et al. [66] investigated the effect of SVA on the morphology of poly(styrene)-b- poly (ethylene oxide) (PS-b-PEO). As shown in Figure 4a, the nanostructure of the PS-b-PEO membrane obtained by conventional casting at room temperature was a disordered and irregular worm-like morphology, while the PS-b-PEO membrane resulting from 5 min of steam annealing treatment with toluene (a selective solvent for PS) was transformed into a highly ordered arrangement of hexagonally filled perpendicular cylindrical microdomains. However, due to preferential wetting of the surface, a thermodynamically preferred morphology should be formed with a cylindrical orientation parallel to the surface instead of perpendicular to the surface, as experimentally obtained in [67]. The formation mechanism of this morphology has not been understood, and various researchers have attempted to use computer simulations or experimental investigations to explain this phenomenon ^[68][69][70][68,69,70]. Phillip et al. [71] analyzed the evolution of the internal morphology of PS-b-PLA during SVA. Theoretical analysis and experimental verification found that the generation of such cylinders evolved from spherical intermediates nucleated at the vapor/polymer membrane interface due to the rapid evaporation of solvent, which created a concentration gradient in the BCP, and the perpendicular orientation of the intermediates with respect to the surface and epitaxial growth into cylinders. However, too-fast evaporation of the solvent does not allow sufficient time for nucleation. Lin et al. [72] used TEM analysis to demonstrate that the length of this ordered arrangement could reach the level of membrane thickness. In other words, SVA can achieve a directional ordered arrangement perpendicular to the membrane surface throughout the membrane, which is of great significance for the development of certain ion- or proton-conducting membranes or water-permeation membranes with controlled pore sizes. Kim et al. [73] demonstrated that SVA yielded a more ordered, structurally stable membrane than those obtained by conventional methods by imparting the molecular chain mobility, shielding the surface energy of the two blocks at the vapor/BCP interface and the interfacial energy between polymer and substrate, and rapidly eliminating defects in the BCP structure (Figure 4b). When the blocks in BCP strongly interact, more variables in the SVA process will affect the structure ^[65][74][75][65,74,75]. For instance, Park et al. [76] proposed structural changes in a PS-b-PMMA membrane by choosing a selective or neutral substrate (different substrate treatments with the generated SEM images of varying morphologies are shown in Figure 4c). The membranes on neutral substrates exhibit a cylindrical structure perpendicular to the surface at the top (near the air) and bottom (near the substrate). For the SVA process on selective substrates, the top structure of the BCP membrane was unaffected, exhibiting a cylindrical structure perpendicular to the surface, but the bottom structure changed to a cylindrical structure parallel to the substrate. This result demonstrates the possibility of tailoring the pattern and structure of the BCP membrane by adjusting the membrane–substrate interaction. Cheng et al. [77] investigated various process parameters during the SVA process and ultimately demonstrated that the temperature of the substrate and vapor were also key factors in controlling the structural morphology of BCP membranes. However, the ordered BCP membrane obtained by the selective solvent SVA method is only short-ranged. It has been shown that long-range ordering of BCP membrane in the lateral direction can be obtained via annealing with nonselective solvent (solvent with the same selectivity for each block and no specific interactions) vapors during SVA [78]. Bosworth et al. [79] obtained a long-range ordered BCP membrane by annealing poly(α-methylstyrene)-block-poly(4-hydroxystyrene) in acetone (selective solvent) vapor, which resulted in a spherical structure and tetrahydrofuran (nonselective solvent) vapor, forming a columnar phase parallel to the surface. This is due to the fact that the nonselective solvent is only uniformly distributed between the molecular chains and same selectivity for each block. It increases only their mobility without any other interactions, resulting in spontaneous formation of a cylindrical orientation parallel to the membrane plane with the lowest surface energy. SVA overcomes the shortcomings of conventional thermal annealing and enables highly ordered rearrangement of BCP in a relatively short time. By reducing the effective T_g, it weakens the interactions between chains and between chains and substrates to increase the mobility of polymer chain [80].

3.2.2. Nonsolvent Approaches for Constructing Nanostructure

Researchers have also investigated the effect of nonsolvent-induced phase separation (NIPS) [81] of BCPs intensively ^[82][83][84][82,83,84]. The polymer is dissolved in solvent to form a homogeneous solution, followed by the slow addition of reagents which are more soluble in the solvent compared to the polymer (called extractants) to extract the solvent. The resulting two-phase structure with the polymer as continuous phase and solvent as the dispersed phase can lead to a polymer with a certain pore structure after the removal of solvent. Plisko et al. [85] modified poly (ethylene glycol)-b-poly (propylene glycol)-b-poly (ethylene glycol) (Pluronic F127) by the NIPS method employing polysulfone (PSF), and the polymer membrane obtained by the NIPS method was found to be porous in comparison to the dense polymer membrane prepared by the EIPS method (the surface structure of the porous film is shown in Figure 5a). Similarly, Gu et al. [86] fabricated porous PI-b-PS-b-P4VP membrane with sponge-like structure using the NIPS method, and Figure 5b shows the cross-sectional structure of the sponge-like porous film. NIPS is the most commonly used method for the preparation of membranes for separation ^[87][88][87,88], but the pore size and distribution of pores on the surface of NIPS-formed membranes are irregular and not well-controlled ^[89][90][89,90], and presence of some large pores can lead to material defects resulting in reduced mechanical strength of the membrane. This feature is responsible for limiting the application of BCP membranes made by the NIPS method in a great way. In order to overcome the shortcoming mentioned above, a new NIPS strategy has emerged in the recent years: a short self-assembly is formed via short solvent evaporation after pouring the BCP into a solvent or mixed solvent, and then it was immersed in a nonsolvent for NIPS ^[91][92][91,92]. By this method, a monolithic, asymmetrically structured membrane, as shown in Figure 5c,d, can be formed [93]. Self-assembly results in the formation of highly ordered, dense pores in the upper thin selective layer which are uniformly perpendicular to the membrane surface [94]; pores of the lower layer which exhibit a sparse, disordered sponge-like interconnected pore channel are formed by NIPS [95]. This method of combining self-assembly (S) of BCP with nonsolvent-induced phase separation (NIPS) is named SNIPS ^[96][97][96,97]. As the first step of membrane formation via SNIPS is dissolution of BCP for self-assembly, different solvent parameters that affect the nanostructure (different selective solvents, mixed solvents, and solvent volatilization rate) discussed in the previous section also affect the membrane structure formed by the SNIPS method ^{[98][99][100]}[98,99,100].

3.2.3. The Influence of External Field on Self-Assembled Structure of BCP

Thermal annealing has proved to be one of the efficient methods for preparing long-range ordered BCP membranes ^{[101][102][103][104]}[101,102,103,104], and temperature is an effective and adjustable experimental condition during the process of self-assembly. Thermal annealing refers to the heating of BCP above its glass transition temperature T_g [105] for allowing the molecular chains within the polymer to self-assemble to the state closest to thermodynamic equilibrium ^{[106][107][108]}[106,107,108]. Stehlin et al. [109] used AFM to observe the morphological variation of PS-b-PMMA at 180 °C and 200 °C (well above its T_g). Their resultant AFM images are shown in Figure 6a. It illustrates that thermal annealing results in ordered arrangement of the molecular chains, and the orderliness of PS-b-PMMA structure at 200 °C is higher than that of 180 °C for the same time, which indicates that the higher the annealing temperature, the faster the order of the arrangement. However, the BCP membrane produced by conventional thermal annealing techniques often shows structural defects, and the range of order regulation is limited, and for a thick membrane, ordering of the molecular chains over a large area cannot be obtained [110]. Moreover, for some polymers, the spacing between T_g and the viscous flow temperature T_f is small, which may not be sufficient for the rearrangement of molecular chains to take place within a short time. In some systems, a combined method of the thermal annealing and solvent annealing methods can be used [111]. Kim et al. [112] experimentally investigated PS-b-P4VP membrane in chloroform vapor (the schematic diagram is shown in Figure 6b). Since chloroform is selective for the PS block, the PS block is pulled toward the outside of the membrane, and the P4VP block forms multilayer spherical micelles. The solvent vapor increases the mobility of the polymer molecular chains by swelling the membrane, and consequently, some of the P4VP blocks fuse. A single SVA process is insufficient to drive the fusion of P4VP spherical structures and subsequently convert them into columnar structures perpendicular to the membrane surface as a result of strong repulsion between the PS and P4VP blocks (B). During the cooling process, chloroform vapor escapes from the inside along the direction perpendicular to the membrane as the membrane shrinks, which allows the spherical structures to aggregate along the vertical direction (C). During further SVA with programmed heating, the aggregation of spherical microdomains can propagate to the inner center of the film (E), resulting in membrane expansion (D), and shrink when cooled. After several cycles of operation, vertically oriented P4VP cylindrical microdomains are obtained (F). This experiment provides an effective orientation method for the orderly arrangement, with strong interactions between the blocks or thick membrane. Furthermore, combining thermal annealing with SVA is enabled to surmount the structural uncontrollability difficulties of high molecular weight BCP, which is due to the low mobility of molecular chains caused by chain entanglement [113]. As early as 1991, Gurovich [114] made a theoretical derivation of the force and phase behavior of BCP in an electric field, but application of electric fields in the research of BCP has stopped at the theoretical level for a while since then. This delay ended when A. Bo¨ker [115] observed the morphological changes of due to the application of DC electric field on the PS-b-PI prepared via reactive anion polymerization. In the absence of an applied electric field, the PS-b-PI self-assembled as ordered lamellar structures in the control group, while under the application of an electric field, lamellar structures of the samples underwent macroscopic orientation along the electric field lines. The application of electric field achieves long-range ordered nanostructures. Schmidt [116] verified the changes in the lamellar structure of PS-b-PI with increasing strength of the electric field. The phase space parallel to the electric field direction decreases, while the phase space perpendicular to the electric field direction increases, mainly resulting from the stretching of polymer molecular chains along the electric field lines (the mechanism is shown above in the Figure 6c). Schoberth et al. [117] used quasi in situ scanning force microscopy (SFM) capable of solvent vapor treatment of BCP despite high electric fields to characterize the phase behavior. Figure 6c below shows the SFM image of the disordered Polystyrene-b-poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-b-poly (methyl methacrylate) S₄₇H₁₀M₄₃ oriented along the electric field direction after the application of an electric field [118]. Subsequently, it was experimentally demonstrated that application of an electric field decreases the T_ODT of PS-b-PI [119]. BCP orientation can also be regulated by the application of shear fields [120]. Unidirectional shear force is applied on the BCP membrane by contacting with suitably selected moving solid surface to induce the internal structure transformation of BCP. The shear modification of polystyrene-b-polybutadiene-b-polystyrene (SBS) and the study of its rheological behavior were carried out by Morrison et al. [121]. The structure of SBS can become oriented along the direction of shear force. Angelescu et al. [122] demonstrated that the rate of shearing plays a decisive role for obtaining the molecular alignment. Low shearing rates allow the molecular chains to arrange in an ordered manner along the shear direction, while too-high shear rates may cause a disordered arrangement of the intramolecular structures. It was then shown that for similar temperature, shear orientation requires less time compared to annealing and generates structures with other defects such as disruption of grain boundaries and absence of dislocations almost in the shear range [123]. Pujari et al. [124] observed a lamellar structure perpendicular to the substrate when the self-assembly of BCP was obtained through the application of shear stress to PS-b-PMMA during annealing. Different structures of BCP such as S, C, and L structures were oriented through the application of shearing. Davis et al. [125] investigated the morphological changes of poly(styrene)-b-poly (n-hexyl methacrylate) (PS-b-PHMA) due to application of shearing and also probed the effect of shearing on different polymer composition (see Figure 6d for a schematic diagram of the apparatus for applying shear and its results). It was finally concluded that shear causes orientation along the shear direction, and that for membranes with varying PS content, the dislocation density is maximum for the membrane containing the highest amount of PS. The ordering of shear field presents a fresh approach toward nanostructural adjustment of BCP membrane, which can achieve unprecedented structural ordering at lower temperatures and under simpler conditions ^[126][127][126,127].

3.2.4. Additives for Regulating Self-Assembly Structure

Researchers also explored various types of substances that can act as electrostatic additives [128] to regulate the nanomorphology of BCP [129], especially, to obtain some morphology in narrow interval [130]. Ionic liquid (IL) is a liquid composed of only anions and cations, with high ionic conductivity, chemical stability, and high thermal stability. Ionic liquids, when doped into BCP, can selectively complex with the charged blocks and induce lyotropic phase transitions via strong electrostatic cohesion [131]. Kim et al. [132] impregnated BCP into different ionic liquids to observe the variation in morphologies. It was demonstrated that the IL, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium p-toluenesulfonate, could induce the structural transformation of the BCP from L to C morphology at a particular concentration, and different ILs result in the induction of different morphologies. Later, Bennett [133] added the IL 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (EMIM) to PS-b-PMMA to obtain a phase transition in the following sequence: D→L→G→C→D→S. IL-induced lyotropic phase transitions of BCP correspond to the single ion-induced phase transitions, while the role of multicharged ions on the phase transitions have rarely been reported, although it is easier to obtain strong electrostatic cohesion by multicharged ions. Polyoxometalate (POM) is a class of polymetallic oxygen cluster compounds formed by pretransition metal ions linked by oxygen, which has recently been applied for controlling the BCP nanostructures ^[134][135][134,135]. Zhang et al. [136] observed a change of an originally ordered columnar phase structure of the block copolymer into a disordered bicontinuous phase structure via incorporating Keggin-type POM H₄SiW₁₂O₄₀ (SiW) into PS-b-P4VP, which was due to strong electrostatic cohesion between the POM and P4VP chains.