The word “neuroblastoma” is often used as an omnibus term for all peripheral neuroblastic tumors (pNTs), including neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma and ganglioneuroma. As well defined by Willis, neuroblastoma is an embryonal tumor of neural crest origin. We believe that all ganglioneuromas were once neuroblastomas in their early stage of tumor development. Tumors in this group are known to present with a wide range of clinical behaviors, such as spontaneous regression, tumor maturation and aggressive progression refractory to intensive treatment. Because of the difficulty in predicting clinical outcomes of the patients, neuroblastoma was described as an enigmatic disease for many years.
1. Introduction
The word “neuroblastoma” is often used as an omnibus term for all peripheral neuroblastic tumors (pNTs), including neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma and ganglioneuroma. As well defined by Willis
[1], neuroblastoma is an embryonal tumor of neural crest origin. We believe that all ganglioneuromas were once neuroblastomas in their early stage of tumor development. Tumors in this group are known to present with a wide range of clinical behaviors, such as spontaneous regression, tumor maturation and aggressive progression refractory to intensive treatment. Because of the difficulty in predicting clinical outcomes of the patients, neuroblastoma was described as an enigmatic disease for many years.
2. Prognostic Factors and Risk Classification
In order to predict a wide range of clinical behaviors of the patients with pNTs, there have been several risk grouping systems historically proposed by different cooperative groups, such as the International Society for Paediatric Oncology European Neuroblastoma (SIOPEN), the Gesellschaft für Paediatrische Onkologie und Haematologie (GPOH) and the Children’s Oncology Group (COG). Currently, two systems, the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) and the COG risk classification system, are widely accepted; both are based on a combination of so-called prognostic factors, such as clinical stage, patient age at diagnosis, histopathology, and genetic and genomic/molecular properties. The INRG has been designed to facilitate the comparison of risk-based clinical trials conducted in different regions and countries and distinguishes very low (>85% survival), low (75–85% survival), intermediate (50–75% survival) and high-risk (<50% survival) patients
[2][5], while the COG risk classification system has been used for the purpose of patient stratification and protocol assignment in international clinical trials
[3][4][6,7]. Prognostic factors utilized in the latest and revised COG system include clinical staging, according to the INRG Staging System (INRGSS; Stages L1, L2, M and MS); age at diagnosis (new cut-off points at 365 days, 548 days and 5 years); histopathology, according to the INPC (favorable histology (FH) vs. unfavorable histology (UH));
MYCN oncogene status (non-amplified vs. amplified); DNA index (hyperdiploid vs. diploid); and segmental chromosomal aberrations (1p
−, 11q
−, 17q
+; No vs. Yes)
[5][8]. The hazard ratio by each prognostic factor is shown in the
Figure 1 and the recent and revised COG neuroblastoma risk classification system is summarized in
Figure 2 [5][8]. Treatment of patients in the low-risk group is often followed by observation (with no chemotherapy or radiation) after surgery or even biopsy alone. Intermediate-risk patients are treated with surgery or biopsy, followed by non-aggressive chemotherapy. High-risk patients are treated with intensive chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, bone marrow/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and biological-based therapies. The reported 5-year survival rates for non-high-risk and high-risk patients are around 90% and 50%, respectively
[5][8].
Figure 1. Neuroblastoma, prognostic factors and hazard ratios. * Clinical stage according to the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System; ** SCA = segmental chromosomal aberrations; *** INPC = International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (FH = favorable histology, UH = unfavorable histology). Note: Clinical stage (localized (L1 and L1) and MS (metastatic, special) disease vs. M (metastatic) disease) and INPC (FH group vs. UH group) distinguish tow prognostic groups with very high hazard ratio.
Figure 2. Children’s Oncology Group revised neuroblastoma risk classification system. For detailed explanation of the revised classification system, please see Ref.
[5][8]. (Irwin M. et al., 2021
[5][8]).
3. Histopathology of the Peripheral Neuroblastic Tumors
As summarized in
Figure 3, according to the INPC, pNTs include four categories and the presence or absence of Schwannian stromal development is noted in parenthesis after the specific tumor category. They are
Neuroblastoma (Schwannian stroma-poor); Ganglioneuroblastoma, Intermixed (Schwannian stroma-rich); Ganglioneuroma (Schwannian stroma-dominant); and Ganglioneuroblastoma, Nodular (composite, Schwannian stroma-rich/stroma-dominant and stroma-poor) [6][9]. The
Neuroblastoma category contains three subtypes—undifferentiated, poorly differentiated and differentiating—based on the grade of neuroblastic differentiation. The
Ganglioneuroma category contains two subtypes—maturing and mature. The INPC also includes three classes of mitosis–karyorrhexis index (MKI)—low (<100/5000 cells), intermediate (100–200/5000 cells) and high (>200/5000 cells)—as another morphologic indicator for tumors in the
Neuroblastoma category. As summarized in
Table 1, the INPC distinguishes two prognostic groups, the FH group and UH group, based on the age-dependent evaluation of histologic findings
[7][8][10,11].
Figure 3. Histologic features of peripheral neuroblastic tumors: (A) neuroblastoma (Schwannian stroma-poor), undifferentiated subtype (original, ×200); (B) neuroblastoma (Schwannian stroma-poor), poorly differentiated subtype (original, ×200); (C) neuroblastoma (Schwannian stroma-poor), differentiating subtype (original, ×200); (D) ganglioneuroblastoma, intermixed (Schwannian stroma-rich) (original, ×100); (E) ganglioneuroma (Schwannian stroma-dominant)—note that completely mature ganglion cells are covered with satellite cells (arrows) (original, ×200); (F) ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular (composite, Schwannian stroma-rich/stroma-dominant and stroma-poor)—note two distinct histologies, i.e., neuroblastoma in the upper half and ganglioneuroma in the lower half in this case (original ×100); (G) Ki-67 immunostaining on two neuroblastomas of poorly differentiated subtype with a low mitosis–karyorrhexis index (original ×400). Note: (G-1) shows biopsy from rapidly enlarging liver of 3-month-old baby (Stage MS case, favorable histology) before starting spontaneous regression; (G-2) shows biopsy from abdominal mass of 5-year-old child (Stage M case, unfavorable histology). The favorable histology tumor contains numerous and more Ki-67 positive nuclei than the unfavorable histology tumor. (H) MYCN oncogene-amplified neuroblastoma demonstrating a characteristic histology of poorly differentiated subtype with a high mitosis–karyorrhexis index (original, ×400). Note: Tumor cells show nucleolar hypertrophy (Inset: prominent nucleoli indicated by arrows).
Table 1. International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification.
|
Age at Diagnosis |
Neuroblastoma (Schwannian stroma-poor) |
<548 days |
548 days–5 years |
≥5 years |
|
Undifferentiated subtype |
|
|
|
With |
Any MKI |
|
|
|
|
Poorly differentiated subtype |
|
|
|
With |
Low MKI |
|
|
|
|
Intermediate MKI |
|
|
|
|
High MKI |
|
|
|
|
Differentiated subtype |
|
|
|
With |
Low MKI |
|
|
|
|
Intermediate MKI |
|
|
|
|
High MKI |
|
|
|
Ganglioneuroblastoma, Intermixed |
|
|
(Schwannian stroma-rich) |
Ganglioneuroma |
|
(Schwannian stroma-dominant) |
Maturing subtype |
Mature subtype |
Ganglioneuroblastoma, Nodular |
|
(Composite, Schwannian stroma-rich/ |
stroma-dominant and stroma-poor) |
|
|
|