Accumulating evidence suggests that alkylated MGMT functions as a transcriptional regulator, regulating the DNA damage response. hMGMT is found at active transcription sites, facilitated by interacting with RNA polymerase II, and it exhibits a preference for repairing m
6G damage specifically in the transcription strands
[56][89]. Upon alkylation, MGMT undergoes a conformational change that exposes VLWKLLKVV residues (codons 98 to 106), allowing it to bind to the estrogen receptor (ER), a critical transcription factor involved in regulating cell proliferation
[57][90]. The binding of alkylated MGMT to ER prevents its interaction with steroid receptor coactivator-1, thereby inhibiting the activation of ER-regulated gene expression
[57][90]. This suggests that alkylated MGMT functions as a transcription regulator, leading to cell cycle arrest. Additionally, alkylated MGMT suppresses the expression of deubiquitinating enzyme 3 (DUB3), thereby impacting chemoresistance in ovarian cancer
[58][91]. It is currently unknown whether this effect is associated with alkylated N-hMGMT or alkylated hMGMT-C. Further research is necessary to elucidate this relationship. Previous studies have indicated that the expression of hMGMT can be modulated by glucocorticoids and partial hepatectomy
[59][60][92,93].
5. The Role of hMGMT in Cancer Prevention and Chemotherapy
The induction of O
6-alkylGuanine (O
6-alkylG) by alkylating agents can result in significant biological consequences such as mutagenicity, cytotoxicity, and carcinogenesis if not repaired by MGMT
[13]. The expression of hMGMT in various cultured cell lines has been shown to effectively reduce GC to AT mutations and cytotoxicity caused by alkylating agents
[61][62][63][64][65][66][36,101,102,103,104,105]. Several excellent reviews have focused on the role of hMGMT in cancer prevention and chemotherapy
[13][24][67][68][69][13,24,37,106,107]. N-nitroso compounds, which are present in many foods, play a crucial role in the development of colorectal cancer
[69][107]. The study utilized a transgenic mouse model where mice had high expression of MGMT in the colon
[70][108]. These mice demonstrated reduced rates of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) formation following intraperitoneal administrations of the alkylating agent azoxymethane (AOM). Additionally, the overexpression of MGMT provided protection against G:C to A:T mutations in the KRAS oncogene induced by AOM
[70][108]. Consistent with these findings, depleting MGMT in rats using the potent MGMT inhibitor B
6G resulted in an increased frequency of colonic tumors following AOM treatment
[71][109]. MGMT knockout mice, in an inflammation-driven colon carcinogenesis model induced by AOM and dextran sodium sulfate, exhibit high susceptibility to colon tumorigenesis
[72][73][110,111].
DNA alkylating agents, such as methylating and chloroethylating agents, have been used in cancer therapy for over four decades
[67][74][75][31,37,39]. Among these agents, the m
6G and O
6-chloroethylG products are the main toxic lesions in most cases, particularly at lower doses
[75][39]. However, at higher doses of these agents, N-alkyl purines also contribute to cellular cytotoxicity, and the significance of MGMT in terms of overall cytotoxicity diminishes
[75][39]. The MGMT gene plays a critical role in repairing DNA damage caused by alkylating agents, thereby promoting resistance to chemotherapy. The methylation of the MGMT promoter leads to the reduced or absent expression of hMGMT by inhibiting transcription, thereby increasing sensitivity to alkylating agents
[76][127]. The methylated MGMT promoter has garnered substantial support as a predictive marker for the effectiveness of temozolomide (TMZ), an alkylating agent used in treating glioblastoma and low-grade gliomas. Multiple studies have provided evidence supporting this notion
[77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135].
6. The Development of Strategies That Target MGMT
6.1. Non Cancer-Selective MGMT Inhibitors
O
6-BG and O
6-(4-bromothenyl)guanine (O
6-4-BTG) are analogs of m
6G that serve as irreversible pseudosubstrates of MGMT
[85][86][87][88][147,148,149,150]. These compounds have been utilized as inhibitors of MGMT in clinical trials
[13][75][13,39]. O
6-BG has gained significant use in sensitizing glioma cells to the alkylating agent TMZ
[13][75][89][90][13,39,151,152]. It possesses the ability to penetrate the blood–brain barrier and deactivate MGMT
[24]. Clinical trials combining O
6-BG with TMZ have shown promise in delaying brain tumor recurrence and increasing survival time
[91][92][93][94][153,154,155,156]. However, it is important to note that this approach carries an elevated risk of side effects such as hydrocephalus, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and brain infection
[95][157].
Due to the limited water solubility of O
6-BG, it is necessary to develop more soluble derivatives to enhance its bioavailability. One approach is the meta-substitution of the aminomethyl group on the benzyl moiety of O
6-BG. This modification enhances the water solubility of the compound and results in a more potent inhibitory activity against MGMT
[96][168]. Several other 6-(benzyloxy)pyrimidine derivatives have been synthesized as potential inhibitors of MGMT
[13][97][13,169]. In addition to the previously mentioned MGMT inhibitors, other types of inhibitors have been discovered. Acrolein and chloromethyltriazoles are highly reactive molecules with nucleophilic sites that can react with cysteine residues, effectively inhibiting MGMT
[98][170]. Another inhibitor, 6-carboxyfluorescein, acts on MGMT in a non-covalent manner
[99][171].
The primary concern regarding the use of non-cancer selective MGMT inhibitors is the increased risk of myelosuppression in bone marrow cells and other normal cells, which can lead to severe hematological toxicity such as leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome
[13][24][97][100][13,24,169,175]. To address these concerns and for various other reasons, researchers are actively developing cancer-selective inhibitors.
6.2. Cancer-Selective MGMT Inhibitors
The primary strategy for developing a cancer-specific MGMT inhibitor involves modifying the inhibitor with tumor-targeting groups
[13][75][13,39]. The objective of this approach is to prevent MGMT inhibition in normal tissues while sensitizing cancer cells to chemotherapy
[13][75][13,39]. Aerobic glycolysis is a prevalent metabolic characteristic observed in numerous tumors. In light of this, the conjugation of a glucose group to the MGMT inhibitor represents a promising concept for the development of cancer-selective MGMT inhibitors
[101][176]. Studies have reported the high efficacy of both O
6-BG-Glucose (O
6-BG-Glu) and O
6-BTG-Glu in inhibiting MGMT in various cancer cell lines, including T98G glioblastoma
[88][101][102][150,176,177].
Prodrugs have the potential to enhance tumor specificity and improve pharmacokinetic profiles
[13][67][13,37]. Many solid tumors exhibit a characteristic of hypoxia, and hypoxia-activated O
6-BG prodrugs have already been developed and utilized
[103][104][181,182]. In particular, the release of β-glucuronidase is commonly observed from necrotic tumor cells. Therefore, designing O
6-BG prodrugs that are substrate-related to β-glucuronidase could be a promising strategy to exploit
[105][183].
6.3. Local Drug Delivery
Drug delivery plays a critical role in improving targeted therapy by utilizing diverse delivery systems and strategies to enhance the effectiveness and specificity of therapeutic agents
[106][184]. Local drug delivery can achieve targeted therapy. Gliadel (BCNU wafers) marked the initial clinical application of polymer drug delivery in the treatment of brain tumors. It involves the insertion of BCNU wafers into the resection cavity of patients following surgery
[107][108][185,186]. These wafers gradually degrade, enabling localized delivery of BCNU to the target area
[109][187]. TMZ was encapsulated within a biologically inert matrix for localized administration to patients with GBM. This encapsulation strategy demonstrated superior efficacy compared to standard therapy alone, resulting in a remarkable increase in overall survival of up to 33 weeks
[110][188]. An injectable enzyme-responsive hydrogel was developed, capable of delivering TMZ and O
6-BG. This hydrogel demonstrated effectiveness in reducing the recurrence of TMZ-resistant glioma after surgery, while also enhancing the inhibitory efficiency against tumors
[111][189].
Nanoparticle-based delivery offers unique properties that enable targeted delivery to specific cells or tissues
[112][190]. In a recent study, a combination of O
6-BG formulation with a redox-responsive theranostic superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (SPION) platform was employed to enhance the intracellular delivery of O
6-BG to glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells while minimizing drug accumulation in healthy tissues
[113][191]. This improved formulation of O
6-BG showed a significant decrease in MGMT activity and enhanced the cytotoxic effect of TMZ in vitro. Additionally, in an orthotopic primary human GBM xenograft mouse model, it resulted in a three-fold increase in survival compared to untreated controls
[113][191]. Another formulation involved nanoparticles (NPs) coated with a pH-sensitive polymer and a modified analog of MGMT inhibitor, specifically dialdehyde-modified O
6-benzylguanosine (DABGS). This formulation demonstrated a remarkable inhibition of MGMT activity and enhanced the cytotoxicity of TMZ in vitro
[114][192].
6.4. Targeting the Expression of hMGMT
Several strategies have been developed to target the expression of MGMT. Among them, the identification of microRNAs (miRNAs) that regulate MGMT expression by degrading MGMT mRNA shows promise as an innovative treatment approach to enhance TMZ sensitivity in patients with unmethylated MGMT
[115][38]. Notably, miRNAs such as miR-142-3p, miR-181d, miR-370-3p, and others have been discovered to downregulate MGMT expression and enhance sensitivity to TMZ in GBM cell lines
[115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][38,201,202,203,204,205,206,207]. Another promising strategy is the use of siRNA to target MGMT. The combination of TMZ with the MGMT–siRNA/liposome complex has shown a strong synergistic antitumor effect
[24][123][24,208]. A small-molecule compound, EPIC-0412, was discovered to enhance the chemotherapeutic effect of TMZ by epigenetically silencing the expression of MGMT. It achieved this by targeting two key pathways: the p21-E2F1 DNA damage repair axis and the ATF3-p-p65-MGMT axis
[124][209].
6.5. Others
Autoantibodies against MGMT were detected in patients’ serum
[125][212]. The researchers screened the most responsive peptides using these autoantibodies and discovered that these peptides conferred resistance to TMZ in glioma cells both in vivo and in vitro
[126][213]. This finding suggests that monoclonal antibodies targeting these peptides could serve as a novel strategy to overcome resistance in GBM cases with unmethylated MGMT promoters to alkylating agents. The new agent-KL-50 has been found to induce cell killing selectively in MGMT-silenced tumors, independent of mismatch repair (MMR). It creates a dynamic DNA lesion that can be repaired by MGMT. However, in MGMT-deficient conditions, this lesion slowly evolves into an interstrand cross-link, leading to MMR-independent cell death. Notably, this process exhibits low toxicity in both in vitro and in vivo settings
[127][214]. This agent represents a novel approach in designing chemotherapeutics that exploit specific DNA repair defects.
7. The Crosstalk of MGMT with Other DNA Repair Pathways
The attack of alkylating agents on DNA can lead to various types of lesions on the heterocyclic bases or backbone. Repairing methylated DNA adducts involves several pathways, primarily the base excision repair (BER) pathway, the family of AlkB homolog proteins (ALKBH), and MGMT (
Figure 5)
[5][14][128][5,14,30]. The BER pathway plays a critical role in repairing the main N-alkylation DNA adducts, such as N3-methyladenine, N3-methylguanine, and N7-methylguanine, with the first step of this process involving the alkyladenine-DNA glycosylase (AAG, MPG)
[5][14][128][129][5,14,30,215].
Figure 5. Model of DNA repair pathways involved in DNA alkylation damage. DNA lesions caused by alkylating agents are processed by BER, ALKBH, and MGMT. If m
6G is unaffected by MGMT during DNA replication, m
6G forms mismatches with T, generating m
6G–T pairs. MMR rectifies these mismatches by removing T from m
6G–T pairs. This futile cycling replication process results in unreplicated gaps opposite the m
6G lesions, which remain tolerated until the subsequent S-phase (
middle panel). In this phase, they impede DNA replication, causing DSBs that trigger cell cycle arrest or eventual cell death. Alternatively, mismatch repair proteins recognizing m
6G/T lesions might function as a scaffold, directly recruiting DNA damage signaling molecules (
middle panel), leading to the activation of cell cycle checkpoints and/or apoptosis. The circles with different color mean different types of DNA lesions.
7.1. MGMT and BER
MGMT and BER are the primary pathways to process DNA lesions induced by alkylating agents. As of now, no glycosylase capable of recognizing m
6G has been discovered. AAG, on the other hand, specifically recognizes N-alkylated purines and does not compete with MGMT. Nevertheless, there are reports suggesting that MGMT activity is regulated by the BER protein-PARP, which plays a critical role in BER for processing N-alkylpurines
[128][30]. The PARP-mediated PARylation of MGMT, induced by alkylating agents, enhances its binding to chromatin and its ability to facilitate the removal of m
6G adducts from DNA (
Figure 6)
[130][131][98,99].
Figure 6. The crosstalk of MGMT with other DNA repair pathways. The interplay of MGMT with other DNA repair mechanisms involves several notable connections. PARP1, a protein in the BER pathway, can perform poly-ADP-ribosylation on hMGMT, resulting in the formation of poly-ADP-ribosylated hMGMT. This modification facilitates the localization of hMGMT within chromatin, enabling efficient repair of DNA lesions. The effectiveness of the NER process can assist MGMT in managing DNA adducts. Through a collaborative effort, MGMT and NER collectively process O
6-carboxymethylguanine (O
6-CMG) lesions, thereby thwarting potential carcinogenic outcomes. Intriguingly, the alkylation of hMGMT and the existence of alkylating damage can accelerate the degradation of BRCA2, potentially heightening the sensitivity of cancer cells to the treatment of crosslinking agents. ↑: increase.
7.2. MGMT and Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER)
The NER pathway plays a crucial role in repairing bulky helix-distorting DNA adducts, like cyclobutene-pyrimidine dimers induced by UV light
[132][216]. Experimental evidence suggests that cells expressing both MGMT and NER proteins efficiently repair O
6-ethylG, indicating a collaborative effort between MGMT and NER in processing this type of DNA damage
[133][217]. The proposed mechanism involves NER proteins opening up the tightly packed chromatin, thereby aiding MGMT in locating and addressing the DNA adducts
[133][217].
7.3. MGMT and MMR
The expression of MGMT plays a critical role in preventing cell death induced by alkylating agents, since it directly converts m
6G back to G. Additionally, MMR also has a significant impact on generating cytotoxic effects triggered by m
6G lesions
[134][221]. Deficiency in MMR results in resistance against these effects, both in vitro and in vivo
[135][136][222,223]. Unrepaired m
6G is highly stable and tends to pair with Thymine (T) instead of G. This m
6G:T mispair is extremely mutagenic, and can be recognized by the MSH2/MSH6 heterodimer of the MMR pathway
[137][224]. The persistence of m
6G on the template strand leads to the formation of m
6G:T mispairs during MMR-directed strand resynthesis, initiating repeated cycles of futile repair
[128][134][138][139][30,221,225,226]. Consequently, unproductive replication cycles across m
6Gs create unreplicated gaps that interfere with DNA replication in the subsequent S-phase, generating double-strand breaks (DSBs) that ultimately cause cell cycle arrest and cell death (
Figure 5)
[128][134][138][139][30,221,225,226]. The futile cycle model finds support through in vitro experiments, which demonstrate that the cytotoxicity of m
6G takes place during the second cell cycle following treatment
[134][138][140][221,225,227]. Circular DNA substrates containing m
6G/T mismatches, rather than regular G/T mismatches, elicit a MMR-dependent preferential recruitment of ATR-ATRIP, leading to ATR activation (
Figure 5)
[141][228].
7.4. MGMT and DSB Repair
Concomitant with DNA replication, MMR gives rise to DSBs induced by m
6G lesions, which are responsible for provoking apoptosis signaling
[75][76][128][30,39,127]. Considering the crucial role of DSBs in m
6G induced cytotoxicity, DSB repair is expected to significantly impact m
6G-induced chromosomal changes. This is supported by the finding that m
6G lesions caused higher aberration frequencies in cells with ATM deficiency
[142][235]. Thus, MGMT serves as a key defense against clastogenicity by O
6-methylating agents, acting in concert with MMR, BER, and DSB repair (
Figure 5)
[128][30]. After DSBs are formed, they undergo repair through homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). BRCA2 plays a crucial role in HR and interacts with hMGMT to facilitate the degradation of methylated or benzylated hMGMT
[143][236].