Chitosan-Based Delivery Systems for Carotenoids: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Jessie Wu and Version 1 by ALESSANDRA VERARDI.

Carotenoids are secondary metabolites present in microorganisms (bacteria, yeast, fungi, and microalgae) and higher plants. They cannot be produced by the human organism. In nature, their principal role is to attract different light wavelengths and transfer their energy to chlorophylls, a function occurring mainly in photosynthetic organisms. Moreover, they can act as photo-protectors, precursors of hormonal substances, antistress secondary metabolites, and attractive agents in plant–insect interaction.

  • carotenoids
  • delivery systems
  • chitosan

1. Chemical Characteristics and Functional Properties of Chitosan

Chitosan is a natural polysaccharide composed of random distributions of N-acetyl-d-glucosamine (GlcNAc) and d-glucosamine (GlcN), with GlcN imparting its cationic properties at neutral/physiological pH [208][1]. It derives from full or partial deacetylation of N-acetyl-d-glucosamine-containing chitin (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Deacetylation reaction of chitin to obtain its fully deacetylated derivative chitosan. N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and glucosamine (GlcN) monomers are shown in dotted boxes; the acetamido groups of chitin are highlighted in green, while the amino groups of chitosan are highlighted in orange.
Currently, the most common commercial source of chitin and chitosan is the exoskeletons of crustaceans [209][2]. Chitin and chitosan also occur in nature in fungal cell walls and insects [210][3].
Chitin deacetylation can be achieved chemically or biologically. The conventional chemical methods under high-concentration alkaline conditions are the most widely used, but their environmental impact and high cost prevent their scaling up and industrial application [14][4]. An alternative chemical method for chitin deacetylation relies on the use of the green solvent glycerol, a recyclable and stable by-product of biodiesel. Nevertheless, it has drawbacks since it requires high temperatures for an extended period [211][5]. Applying microwaves or ultrasounds can accelerate chitin deacetylation, thus reducing extraction times and chemical solvent concentration [14][4].
The biological method employs chitin deacetylase enzymes derived from fungi and bacteria. Due to its mild reaction conditions, it is an eco-friendly alternative to chemical methods. Despite this, high enzyme costs and long reaction times limit this process’s scaling up [212][6].
Chitin becomes chitosan when it is deacetylated to a deacetylation degree (DDA) of 50% [213,214][7][8]. DDA indicates the percentage of d-glucosamine units to the total monomer units (i.e., d-glucosamine and N-acetyl-d-glucosamine) in the chitosan polymer chain. DDA plays a major role in influencing chitosan’s physicochemical properties, such as solubility, flexibility, crystallinity, conductivity, viscosity, and surface tension [215][9]. In this way, DDA affects chitosan’s biological properties and performance in many applications [216,217][10][11]. A 70–96% DDA and molecular weight of 1000–2500 kDa are typical of commercial chitosan [218][12].
Chitosan has unique characteristics, such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, low toxicity, and low allergenicity [219,220][13][14]. It exhibits many biological activities, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antitumoral, hypocholesterolemic, blood anticoagulant, etc. [221][15].
Chitosan contains native amine groups that are positively charged; hence, it is a natural cationic biopolymer in water at pH < 6. The positive charge enables the interaction with negatively charged molecules, including phospholipids, fatty acids, proteins, DNA, RNA, and anionic polysaccharides, such as carrageenan and alginate. The cationic form explains its antimicrobial, gelling, and coating properties. Moreover, chitosan occurs negatively charged at alkaline pH due to the hydroxyl groups of its d-glucosamine units. In the anionic form, it can chelate various metal cations, including copper, iron, and cadmium [222][16]. In addition, primary amino and hydroxyl groups of chitosan are fundamental reactive sites for its easy conversion to other derivatives, such as phosphorylated chitosan, quaternary ammonium chitosan salts, carboxymethyl chitosans, and many other substituted chitosans [223][17].

2. Chitosan Nanocarriers for Effective Delivery of Carotenoids (as Advanced Delivery Systems)

Chitosan exhibits numerous functional properties, making it well suited to a wide range of applications from chemical and agrochemical industries to pharmaceutical, medical, and cosmetic industries, food and nutrition industries, textile and paper industries, etc., as summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Applications of chitosan in different fields.
Field Chitosan Applications Form
Agriculture Biofertilizer and biocontrol agent (time release of products)

Booster of plant growth and plant production

Controlled agrochemical release

Frost protection

Modify plant-microbial interactions

Pesticide formulations

Soil conditioner

Stimulator of crop yield

Stimulator of secondary metabolites to induce plant defenses
Solution

Film

Powder

Spray

Coating

Gel

Powder

Nanoparticle
Aquaculture Removal of organic/inorganic compounds

Removal of bacteria

Removal of ammonia

Functional food

Micro-carrier for bioactive compounds

Probiotics

Drugs microencapsulation

Drug delivery

Oral delivery (vaccination)

Antimicrobial and antioxidant
Microsphere

Bead

Powder
Pharmaceutical and medical/biomed Excipients

Gene, drug, and vaccine delivery system

Antimicrobial agent (antibacterial, antifungal)

Anti-inflammatory, antiulcer, and antihypertensive agent

Dermatological products

Hydrating agents

Nutraceutical ingredient

Hemostatic and anticoagulant compound

Antitumor agent and tumor inhibition

Anti-HIV agent

Innate immune cell recruitment and activation agent

Treatment of leukemia, diabetes

Sutures, surgical threads, bandages, sponges

Biocompatible and biodegradable materials for use as implants, blood substitutes, blood vessels or wound dressing material

Dental implants

Contact lenses

Magnetic resonance imaging
Solution

Powder

Tablet

Nanoparticle

Nanocomposite

Sponge

Gel and hydrogel

Microsphere

Capsule and microcapsule

Bead

Film

Fiber and nanofiber
Food and nutrition Additives for human and animal

Antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidants

Astringency

Diet foods and dietary fibers

Edible films

Hypolipidemic and hypocholesterolemia activities

Infant feed ingredient

Prebiotics
Solution

Film

Blend

Coating

Bead
Cosmetic Antistatic effect

Bacteriostatic

Body cleaning products

Encapsulating agent

Functional additives

Hydrating and film-forming agent

Products for hair care

Products for oral/dental care

Products: shampoos, creams, lotions, nail polish, make-up powder, etc.

Skin delivery formulations

Thickening agent
Solution

Film

Powder
Environmental Adsorbent/biosorbent

Antibacterial material

Antifouling agent

Coagulant/flocculant

Interactions with proteins and amino acids

Material for treatment of contaminant water

Polymer for ultrafiltration

Reduce odors
Adsorbent/biosorbent

Coagulant/flocculant

Antifouling agent

Interactions with proteins and amino acids

Reduce odors

Polymer for ultrafiltration

Material for treatment of contaminant water

Antibacterial material
Textile Dye-binder for textiles

Impregnated textile materials

Binding agent for non-woven

Surface modification of textiles

Textiles with anti-bacterial properties

Textile antimicrobial finishing

Sanitary fibrous products

Surgical threads

Textile preservative and deodorant agent

Non-allergenic fibers
Microcapsule

Fiber

Gel and gelatinous dispersion

Coating
Paper and pulp Wet strength agent

Reduction in paper water vapor permeability

Antibacterial and antimicrobial protective coating for paper packaging

Antitermite in papermaking

Retention and drainage agents

Biodegradable packaging

Wrapping and toilet paper

Carbonless copy paper

Cardboard

Chromatography paper

Modification of cellulose fibers

Photochromic paper

Papermaking wastewater treatments
Nanoparticle

Powder

Coating
Biotechnology and chemistry Adhesive activity between metallic surfaces

Analytical reagent

Binders for silicon/graphite

Biosensors, electronic and electrochemical devices

Cell-recovery

composite electrodes in lithium-ion batteries

Corrosion protection of aluminum

Enzyme and cell immobilization

Ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents

Matrix for chromatography

Membranes for lithium batteries

Metabolic Analysis of biological fluids

Permeability control

Protein separation

Reverse osmosis

Solvent separation

Transport direction of target molecules
Powder

Bead

Nanoparticle

Microsphere

Sponge

Coating

Fiber

Solution

Ionic liquids

Membrane

Sensors

Composite

Blend
Based on [14,212,217,224,225,226,227,228,229][4][6][11][18][19][20][21][22][23].
Developing delivery systems for food ingredients and nutraceuticals implies the use of GRAS substances (generally regarded as safe), which must be recognized previously as suitable for human consumption, for example, by the EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) in Europe or by the US FDA (United States Food and Drug Administration) in the USA [9,13][27][28]. Chitosan is recognized as GRAS and approved for dietary use in Italy, Japan, and Finland [232][29]. Chitosan-coating treatments significantly retarded enzymatic browning on the surface of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables during storage, extending their shelf life and preserving their quality attributes [216][10]. Moreover, the polycationic nature of chitosan makes it one of the most potent antimicrobials, capable of inhibiting a wide range of microorganisms, including Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, as well as yeast and mold [233][30]. Four main mechanisms are implicated in chitosan’s ability to kill microorganisms [14[4][10][30],216,233], as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Main mechanisms of action of chitosan against microorganisms.
Carotenoids’ incorporation into chitosan-based delivery systems has been shown to benefit these nutritional components [13,232][28][29]. Carotenoids’ biological activity is heavily influenced by preserving their bioavailability or the fraction of an ingested compound that is absorbed and available for physiological functions (i.e., enters the systemic circulation in an active form) [13][28]. Several factors can compromise carotenoid bioavailability, including insufficient gastric residence time, low permeability and/or solubility within the gastrointestinal tract, and instability [13,234][28][31]. As a result, chitosan-based delivery systems improve the stability, bioactivity, and bioavailability of carotenoids, and control their release, thus increasing their efficacy. [9,10,11,12,13][24][27][28][32][33].
Two types of chitosan-based delivery systems are widely employed for carotenoid encapsulation: lipid-based and biopolymeric systems [9][27]. In lipid-based delivery systems, chitosan has been extensively studied as a coating material to make nanoemulsions and nanoliposomal vehicles designed for greater solubilization and micellarization of the carried carotenoids than the crystalline form in which they are found in plant tissues [235][34] (Rostamabadi et al., 2019). Adding chitosan to nanoemulsions and nanoliposomes protects encapsulated compounds and controls their release [236][35]. Biopolymeric delivery systems include polysaccharide-based and biopolymeric nanogels [9,237][27][36]. Several techniques can be used to prepare biopolymer nanoparticles developed for carotenoid delivery, including emulsification, desolvation, coacervation, and electrospray drying [238][37].
Figure 3 shows nanomaterials developed using chitosan for application as carotenoid delivery systems.
Figure 3.
Nanomaterials developed using chitosan for application as carotenoid delivery systems.
Table 2 summarizes some chitosan-based delivery systems used for the encapsulation of carotenoids.
Table 2.
Chitosan-based delivery systems for encapsulating carotenoids.
Delivery System Carotenoids Particle Size (nm) Encapsulation Efficiency (%) Storage Stability (Days) Ref.
Chitosan-coated Nanoemulsion β-carotene 218; 143.7 NA 21 at 37 °C [18][38]
Chitosan-coated Nanoliposomes β-carotene, Lutein, Lycopene, Canthaxanthin 70 to 100 75 NA [239][39]
Chitosan (Polysaccharide)-Based Nanocarriers β-carotene NA >95 NA [240][40]
Chitosan-based Nanogels Fucoxanthin 200 to 500 47 to 90 6 at 37 °C [241][41]
NA = Not applicable.
Nanoemulsions (NEs) represent an effective bioactive molecule delivery system for enhancing physicochemical stability, water dispersibility, and bioavailability [9,242][27][42]. Small droplet sizes and improved functional properties characterize these kinetically stable colloidal systems. The most employed NEs are oil-in-water (o/w) and water-in-oil (w/o) types, although multiple emulsion types (o/w/o and w/o/w) are also used occasionally [242][42].
Baek et al. (2020) [18][38] employed chitosan to coat β-carotene-loaded NEs obtained by mixing an appropriate proportion of β-carotene (10 mg), medium chain triglycerides oil (10%), Tween 80 (4.5%), lecithin (4.5%) and deionized water (80%). This mixing was undergone via high-speed homogenization at 5000 rpm for 10 min and probe sonication for 40 min. The prepared β-carotene NEs were then mixed with 2% water-soluble chitosan (WSC) in a 1:1 ratio, obtaining water-soluble chitosan-β-carotene NEs (WSC-BC-NEs) with a mean particle size at 218 nm. Compared to uncoated β-carotene NEs, WSC-BC-NEs showed enhanced stability, exhibiting β-carotene retention of 82% or 77.6% as well as improved thermal stability by 45.1% or 28.6% after 21-day storage at 37 °C or 21-day UV light exposure at room temperature, respectively. Then, using chitosan to coat nanoemulsions successfully increased both the thermal and UV light stability of the encapsulated β-carotene. The zeta potential of the coated nanoemulsions (WSC-BC-NEs) shifted from negative to positive after chitosan coating and was high (+40 mV), suggesting a stable nanoemulsion [18][38]. Therefore, water-soluble chitosan coating could be an effective strategy in the food industry to produce β-carotene emulsions with enhanced stability.

2.2. Chitosan-Coated Nanoliposomes (Chitosomes)

Nanoliposomes are nanoscale colloidal structures formed by concentric phospholipid bilayered vesicles and an aqueous core [11][32]. Due to their amphiphilic nature, they are versatile structures that can incorporate and carry both hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecules, separated or simultaneously [243][43]. Hydrophilic molecules can be located in the aqueous core, whereas hydrophobic molecules can be found between the two phospholipid layers [9][27]. Nanoliposomes have a smaller size and a higher surface-to-volume ratio than macro- and micro-liposomes. These characteristics can improve the bioaccessibility, bioavailability, and stability of the encapsulated compounds [244][44]. Finally, they are biocompatible, biodegradable, and well suited for carotenoids’ encapsulation and delivery [245,246][45][46]. Tan et al. (2014) [247][47] effectively encapsulated carotenoids, including lutein, β-carotene, lycopene, and canthaxanthin, in nano liposomal structures and assessed their bioaccessibility. Lutein exhibited the highest bioaccessibility, followed by β-carotene, lycopene, and canthaxanthin. Due to their encapsulation in liposomes, these carotenoids also showed an increase in their antioxidant activity in the following order: lutein > β-carotene > lycopene > canthaxanthin [247][47]. As recently as 2020, Hamadou et al. successfully developed β-carotene-loaded marine and egg phospholipids nanoliposomes. The nanoliposomes produced using marine phospholipids were smaller, better at inhibiting lipid peroxidation, and stable at 4 °C for 70 days [245][45].
However, nanoliposomal particles suffer from drawbacks related to the stability and leakage of the encapsulated compound during storage or digestion, which limits their applicability [248][48]. Using chitosan as a coating material appears to be a promising approach for nanoliposomal surface modification aimed at improving stability during processing and in gastrointestinal conditions. As an example, conventional nanoliposomes are susceptible to gastric pH and enzymatic degradation. Then, a polymeric coating based on chitosan could enhance the bioavailability of ingredients absorbed in the intestine and protect the bioactive during food processing in which some conditions, such as temperature and pH, are employed [236][35].
Hybrid systems containing chitosan-coated nanoliposomes are known as “chitosomes” [249][49]. Tan et al. (2016) [239][39] successfully developed 70–100 nanometer-sized chitosomes by combining nanoliposomes with chitosan to encapsulate four kinds of carotenoids, specifically lycopene, β-carotene, lutein, and canthaxanthin. Chitosan was flatly adsorbed onto nanoliposome membrane surfaces via electrostatic attraction, inducing charge inversion but maintaining the nanoliposome spherical shape. Chitosan linked to the nanoliposomal surface prevents lipid molecules from moving freely, enhancing their ordering at the polar headgroup region and hydrophobic core of the membrane. These rigidifying effects enhanced nanoliposome stability against heating (at 37 °C for 6 h, 65 °C for 30 min, and 90 °C for 30 s), gastrointestinal stress (0.06–0.31% release over 4 h), and centrifugal sedimentation. The authors have also demonstrated that chitosomes’ encapsulating and retaining ability is highly dependent on the molecular structures of carotenoids. As a result, the liposomal membrane preserved β-carotene and lutein more efficiently than lycopene and canthaxanthin [239][39]. This restudy earch suggests that chitosomes could be used to deliver bioactive compounds in nutraceuticals and functional foods.

2.3. Chitosan-Based Nanocarriers

Using chitosan as a polysaccharide biopolymer to bind a poorly soluble bioactive molecule enhances the molecule’s stability and keeps it from degrading [250][50]. Furthermore, polysaccharide-based nanocarriers are more stable at high temperatures than lipid- or protein-based nanocarriers, which melt or denature at high temperatures [251][51].
Table 3 summarizes different studies testing the encapsulation of carotenoids in nanocarriers based on chitosan as a polymer.
Table 3.
Summary of different studies testing the encapsulation of carotenoids in nanocarriers based on chitosan as a polymer.
Delivery System Biopolymer Loaded Compound Findings Ref.
Polysaccharide-based nanocarrier Chitosan Lutein Bioavailability improved by 27.7%. Postprandial levels in blood plasma (54.5%), liver (53.9%), and eyes (62.8%) in mice higher than control. [21][52]
Poly (ethylene oxide)-4-methoxycinnamoylphthaloyl-chitosan (PCPLC)/

poly(vinylalcohol-co-vinyl-4-methoxycinnamate) (PB4)/

ethylcellulose (EC)
Astaxanthin In PCLC: high encapsulation efficiency (98%), loading (40%), and high stability to heat. No positive results with PB4 or EC encapsulation [20][53]
Chitosan + sodium tripolyphosphate/

chitosan + carboxymethylcellulose
β-carotene Chitosan + sodium tripolyphosphate carrier: high β-carotene release in aqueous media and gastric fluid, and adequate release in intestinal fluids.

Chitosan + carboxymethylcellulose carrier: efficient release in aqueous media and gastric fluid; small release in intestinal fluid. β-carotene release enhanced in food systems with both carriers.
[240][40]
Tachaprutinun et al. (2009) [20][53] evaluated astaxanthin encapsulated into the following three different polymers: poly (ethylene oxide)-4-methoxycinnamoylphthaloyl-chitosan (PCPLC), poly(vinylalcohol-co-vinyl-4-methoxycinnamate) (PB4), and ethylcellulose (EC). PCPLC led to a high encapsulation (98%) and loading (40%) efficiency. Moreover, astaxanthin-loaded PCPLC exhibited high stability when heated for 2 h at 70 °C in an aqueous environment. By contrast, EC failed to encapsulate astaxanthin, while PB4 showed low encapsulation efficiency. Both suffered complete degradation upon heating [20][53].
Rutz et al. (2016) [240][40] encapsulated β-carotene in microparticles formed by chitosan/sodium tripolyphosphate or chitosan/carboxymethylcellulose. The authors evaluated the performance of these microparticles in food systems by analyzing the carotenoid release profile under simulated gastric and intestinal conditions. A higher than 95% encapsulation efficiency was achieved. Chitosan/sodium tripolyphosphate-coated microparticles yielded approximately 55%, while chitosan/carboxymethylcellulose-coated microparticles yielded 87%. In water and gastric fluid, chitosan/carboxymethylcellulose-encapsulated particles showed optimal release behavior, while their release in the intestinal fluid was low. When applied to food systems, these particles produced enhanced carotenoid releases in the intestinal fluid, but they released low amounts of carotenoids during storage. In contrast, chitosan/sodium tripolyphosphate carriers provided adequate β-carotene release in aqueous media and gastric fluid, as well as an acceptable release in intestinal fluids. Like its counterpart, β-carotene released from these carriers was enhanced when incorporated into food systems. Conversely, these carriers released more β-carotene during storage [240][40].

2.4. Chitosan-Based Nanogels

Chitosan can be used as biopolymeric material to prepare nanogels that are dispersions of hydrogel nanoparticles derived from physically or chemically cross-linked polymeric networks [19,252][55][56]. Nanogels represent next-generation drug delivery systems due to their ability to encapsulate drugs efficiently, ease of preparation, and low toxicity [252][56].
Chitosan-based nanogels are synthesized by reacting amino groups on chitosan in aqueous droplets with an ionic crosslinker, such as tripolyphosphate (TPP), or chemical crosslinker, such as glutaraldehyde [253][57].
Ravi et al. (2015) [254][58] developed chitosan–glycolipid nanogels loaded with fucoxanthin (Fx) by using an ionic-gelation method with polymeric chitosan dispersed in glycolipid (GL) as a carrier. Fx is a marine xanthophyll carotenoid present in brown algae that exhibits antioxidative properties. In this restudyearch, nanoencapsulation improved the bioavailability of Fx. Furthermore, the authors investigated the adverse effect of acute and sub-acute toxicity of chitosan nanogels (CS-NGs) loaded with Fx + GL in rats, determining that the CS-NGs are safe for delivering Fx even at higher doses [254][58]. In addition, Ravi and Baskaran (2015) used an ionic gelation method to develop fucoxanthin-loaded chitosan–glycolipid hybrid nanogels (Fx-CH-GL NGs) composed of chitosan and glycoside (1:0.5 w/w), sodium tripolyphosphate in water (0.03%) and fucoxanthin (1 mg). Fx-CH-GL-NGs were demonstrated to have higher stability and bioavailability in vitro (68%) than those of standard Fx (51%) and Fx + GL (35.5%) [241][41].

References

  1. Li, J.; Cai, C.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Sun, T.; Wang, L.; Wu, H.; Yu, G. Chitosan-Based Nanomaterials for Drug Delivery. Molecules 2018, 23, 2661.
  2. Iber, B.T.; Kasan, N.A.; Torsabo, D.; Omuwa, J.W. A Review of Various Sources of Chitin and Chitosan in Nature. J. Renew. Mater. 2022, 10, 1097–1123.
  3. Jones, M.; Kujundzic, M.; John, S.; Bismarck, A. Crab vs. Mushroom: A Review of Crustacean and Fungal Chitin in Wound Treatment. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 64.
  4. Errico, S.; Spagnoletta, A.; Verardi, A.; Moliterni, S.; Dimatteo, S.; Sangiorgio, P. Tenebrio Molitor as a Source of Interesting Natural Compounds, Their Recovery Processes, Biological Effects, and Safety Aspects. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 148–197.
  5. Maddaloni, M.; Vassalini, I.; Alessandri, I. Green Routes for the Development of Chitin/Chitosan Sustainable Hydrogels. Sustain. Chem. 2020, 1, 325–344.
  6. Sangiorgio, P.; Verardi, A.; Dimatteo, S.; Spagnoletta, A.; Moliterni, S.; Errico, S. Valorisation of Agri-Food Waste and Mealworms Rearing Residues for Improving the Sustainability of Tenebrio molitor Industrial Production. J. Insects Food Feed. 2022, 8, 509–524.
  7. Verardi, A.; Sangiorgio, P.; Moliterni, S.; Errico, S.; Spagnoletta, A.; Dimatteo, S. Advanced Technologies for Chitin Recovery from Crustacean Waste. Clean. Technol. Recycl. 2023, 3, 4–43.
  8. Schmitz, C.; González Auza, L.; Koberidze, D.; Rasche, S.; Fischer, R.; Bortesi, L. Conversion of Chitin to Defined Chitosan Oligomers: Current Status and Future Prospects. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 452.
  9. Nguyen, H.T.-T.; Tran, T.N.; Ha, A.C.; Huynh, P.D. Impact of Deacetylation Degree on Properties of Chitosan for Formation of Electrosprayed Nanoparticles. J. Nanotechnol. 2022, 2022, 1–11.
  10. Li, N.; Xiong, X.; Ha, X.; Wei, X. Comparative Preservation Effect of Water-Soluble and Insoluble Chitosan from Tenebrio Molitor Waste. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 165–171.
  11. Morin-Crini, N.; Lichtfouse, E.; Torri, G.; Crini, G. Fundamentals and Applications of Chitosan; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 49–123.
  12. Kaczmarek, M.B.; Struszczyk-Swita, K.; Li, X.; Szczęsna-Antczak, M.; Daroch, M. Enzymatic Modifications of Chitin, Chitosan, and Chitooligosaccharides. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 243.
  13. Jiang, B.; Kauffman, A.E.; Li, L.; McFee, W.; Cai, B.; Weinstein, J.; Lead, J.R.; Chatterjee, S.; Scott, G.I.; Xiao, S. Health Impacts of Environmental Contamination of Micro- And Nanoplastics: A Review. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2020, 25, 29.
  14. Maleki, G.; Milani, J.M. Functional Properties of Chitin and Chitosan-Based Polymer Materials. In Handbook of Chitin and Chitosan; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 177–198.
  15. Kim, D. Physico-Chemical Conversion of Lignocellulose: Inhibitor Effects and Detoxification Strategies: A Mini Review. Molecules 2018, 23, 309.
  16. Philibert, T.; Lee, B.H.; Fabien, N. Current Status and New Perspectives on Chitin and Chitosan as Functional Biopolymers. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 181, 1314–1337.
  17. Kaya, M.; Mujtaba, M.; Ehrlich, H.; Salaberria, A.M.; Baran, T.; Amemiya, C.T.; Galli, R.; Akyuz, L.; Sargin, I.; Labidi, J. On Chemistry of γ-Chitin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 176, 177–186.
  18. Casadidio, C.; Peregrina, D.V.; Gigliobianco, M.R.; Deng, S.; Censi, R.; Di Martino, P. Chitin and Chitosans: Characteristics, Eco-Friendly Processes, and Applications in Cosmetic Science. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 369.
  19. Adnan, S.; Ranjha, N.M.; Hanif, M.; Asghar, S. O-Carboxymethylated Chitosan; A Promising Tool with in-Vivo Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Properties in Albino Rats. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 156, 531–536.
  20. Yilmaz Atay, H. Antibacterial Activity of Chitosan-Based Systems. In Functional Chitosan: Drug Delivery and Biomedical Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 457–489. ISBN 9789811502637.
  21. Abd El-Hack, M.E.; El-Saadony, M.T.; Shafi, M.E.; Zabermawi, N.M.; Arif, M.; Batiha, G.E.; Khafaga, A.F.; Abd El-Hakim, Y.M.; Al-Sagheer, A.A. Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties of Chitosan and Its Derivatives and Their Applications: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 2726–2744.
  22. Nawaz, A.; Wong, T.W. Chitosan as Anticancer Compound and Nanoparticulate Matrix for Cancer Therapeutics. In Encyclopedia of Marine Biotechnology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 1737–1752.
  23. van Huis, A.; Oonincx, D.G.A.B. The Environmental Sustainability of Insects as Food and Feed. A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 37, 43.
  24. Sinha, V.R.; Singla, A.K.; Wadhawan, S.; Kaushik, R.; Kumria, R.; Bansal, K.; Dhawan, S. Chitosan Microspheres as a Potential Carrier for Drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 274, 1–33.
  25. Garg, U.; Chauhan, S.; Nagaich, U.; Jain, N. Current Advances in Chitosan Nanoparticles Based Drug Delivery and Targeting. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2019, 9, 195–204.
  26. Qin, C.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, W.; Hu, Q.; Wang, Y. Convenient One-Step Approach Based on Stimuli-Responsive Sol-Gel Transition Properties to Directly Build Chitosan-Alginate Core-Shell Beads. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 87, 253–259.
  27. Molteni, C.; La Motta, C.; Valoppi, F. Improving the Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability of Carotenoids by Means of Nanostructured Delivery Systems: A Comprehensive Review. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1931.
  28. Gonçalves, R.F.S.; Martins, J.T.; Duarte, C.M.M.; Vicente, A.A.; Pinheiro, A.C. Advances in Nutraceutical Delivery Systems: From Formulation Design for Bioavailability Enhancement to Efficacy and Safety Evaluation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 270–291.
  29. Bellich, B.; D’Agostino, I.; Semeraro, S.; Gamini, A.; Cesàro, A. “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly” of Chitosans. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 99.
  30. Shin, C.S.; Kim, D.Y.; Shin, W.S. Characterization of Chitosan Extracted from Mealworm Beetle (Tenebrio Molitor, Zophobas Morio) and Rhinoceros Beetle (Allomyrina Dichotoma) and Their Antibacterial Activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 125, 72–77.
  31. Jafernik, K.; Ładniak, A.; Blicharska, E.; Czarnek, K.; Ekiert, H.; Wiącek, A.E.; Szopa, A. Chitosan-Based Nanoparticles as Effective Drug Delivery Systems—A Review. Molecules 2023, 28, 1963.
  32. Shade, C.W. Liposomes as Advanced Delivery Systems for Nutraceuticals. Integr. Med. Encinitas 2016, 15, 33–36.
  33. Liao, P.; Dai, S.; Lian, Z.; Tong, X.; Yang, S.; Chen, Y.; Qi, W.; Peng, X.; Wang, H.; Jiang, L. The Layered Encapsulation of Vitamin B2 and β-Carotene in Multilayer Alginate/Chitosan Gel Microspheres: Improving the Bioaccessibility of Vitamin B2 and β-Carotene. Foods 2021, 11, 20.
  34. Rostamabadi, H.; Falsafi, S.R.; Jafari, S.M. Nanoencapsulation of Carotenoids within Lipid-Based Nanocarriers. J. Control. Release 2019, 298, 38–67.
  35. Esposto, B.S.; Jauregi, P.; Tapia-Blácido, D.R.; Martelli-Tosi, M. Liposomes vs. Chitosomes: Encapsulating Food Bioactives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 108, 40–48.
  36. Assadpour, E.; Mahdi Jafari, S. A Systematic Review on Nanoencapsulation of Food Bioactive Ingredients and Nutraceuticals by Various Nanocarriers. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 3129–3151.
  37. Sahani, S.; Sharma, Y.C. Advancements in Applications of Nanotechnology in Global Food Industry. Food Chem. 2021, 342, 128318.
  38. Baek, E.J.; Garcia, C.V.; Shin, G.H.; Kim, J.T. Improvement of Thermal and UV-Light Stability of β-Carotene-Loaded Nanoemulsions by Water-Soluble Chitosan Coating. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 1156–1163.
  39. Tan, C.; Feng, B.; Zhang, X.; Xia, W.; Xia, S. Biopolymer-Coated Liposomes by Electrostatic Adsorption of Chitosan (Chitosomes) as Novel Delivery Systems for Carotenoids. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 52, 774–784.
  40. Rutz, J.K.; Borges, C.D.; Zambiazi, R.C.; Da Rosa, C.G.; Da Silva, M.M. Elaboration of Microparticles of Carotenoids from Natural and Synthetic Sources for Applications in Food. Food Chem. 2016, 202, 324–333.
  41. Ravi, H.; Baskaran, V. Biodegradable Chitosan-Glycolipid Hybrid Nanogels: A Novel Approach to Encapsulate Fucoxanthin for Improved Stability and Bioavailability. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 43, 717–725.
  42. Sridhar, K.; Inbaraj, B.S.; Chen, B.-H. Recent Advances on Nanoparticle Based Strategies for Improving Carotenoid Stability and Biological Activity. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 713.
  43. Aguilar-Pérez, K.M.; Avilés-Castrillo, J.I.; Medina, D.I.; Parra-Saldivar, R.; Iqbal, H.M.N. Insight Into Nanoliposomes as Smart Nanocarriers for Greening the Twenty-First Century Biomedical Settings. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 579536.
  44. Khorasani, S.; Danaei, M.; Mozafari, M.R. Nanoliposome Technology for the Food and Nutraceutical Industries. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 79, 106–115.
  45. Hamadou, A.H.; Huang, W.-C.; Xue, C.; Mao, X. Comparison of β-Carotene Loaded Marine and Egg Phospholipids Nanoliposomes. J. Food Eng. 2020, 283, 110055.
  46. Subramani, T.; Ganapathyswamy, H. An Overview of Liposomal Nano-Encapsulation Techniques and Its Applications in Food and Nutraceutical. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 3545–3555.
  47. Tan, C.; Zhang, Y.; Abbas, S.; Feng, B.; Zhang, X.; Xia, S. Modulation of the Carotenoid Bioaccessibility through Liposomal Encapsulation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 123, 692–700.
  48. Zamani Ghaleshahi, A.; Rajabzadeh, G. The Influence of Sodium Alginate and Genipin on Physico-Chemical Properties and Stability of WPI Coated Liposomes. Food Res. Int. 2020, 130, 108966.
  49. dos Santos, P.P.; Andrade, L.d.A.; Flôres, S.H.; Rios, A.d.O. Nanoencapsulation of Carotenoids: A Focus on Different Delivery Systems and Evaluation Parameters. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 3851–3860.
  50. Nowak, E.; Livney, Y.D.; Niu, Z.; Singh, H. Delivery of Bioactives in Food for Optimal Efficacy: What Inspirations and Insights Can Be Gained from Pharmaceutics? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 91, 557–573.
  51. Fathi, M.; Martín, Á.; McClements, D.J. Nanoencapsulation of Food Ingredients Using Carbohydrate Based Delivery Systems. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 39, 18–39.
  52. Martínez-Álvarez, Ó.; Calvo, M.M.; Gómez-Estaca, J. Recent Advances in Astaxanthin Micro/Nanoencapsulation to Improve Its Stability and Functionality as a Food Ingredient. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 406.
  53. Tachaprutinun, A.; Udomsup, T.; Luadthong, C.; Wanichwecharungruang, S. Preventing the Thermal Degradation of Astaxanthin through Nanoencapsulation. Int. J. Pharm. 2009, 374, 119–124.
  54. Arunkumar, R.; Prashanth, K.V.H.; Baskaran, V. Promising Interaction between Nanoencapsulated Lutein with Low Molecular Weight Chitosan: Characterization and Bioavailability of Lutein In Vitro and In Vivo. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 327–337.
  55. Pateiro, M.; Gómez, B.; Munekata, P.E.S.; Barba, F.J.; Putnik, P.; Kovačević, D.B.; Lorenzo, J.M. Nanoencapsulation of Promising Bioactive Compounds to Improve Their Absorption, Stability, Functionality and the Appearance of the Final Food Products. Molecules 2021, 26, 1547.
  56. Debele, T.A.; Mekuria, S.L.; Tsai, H.C. Polysaccharide Based Nanogels in the Drug Delivery System: Application as the Carrier of Pharmaceutical Agents. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 68, 964–981.
  57. Wang, L.Y.; Ma, G.H.; Su, Z.G. Preparation of Uniform Sized Chitosan Microspheres by Membrane Emulsification Technique and Application as a Carrier of Protein Drug. J. Control. Release 2005, 106, 62–75.
  58. Ravi, H.; Arunkumar, R.; Baskaran, V. Chitosan-Glycolipid Nanogels Loaded with Anti-Obese Marine Carotenoid Fucoxanthin: Acute and Sub-Acute Toxicity Evaluation in Rodent Model. J. Biomater. Appl. 2015, 30, 420–434.
More
ScholarVision Creations