You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 The DNA sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Fagus sylvatica L. was sequenced and annotated (GenBank MT446430). A CAPS marker set for the genetic identification of the genus Fagus in tree tissues or wood products was developed. Birgit Kersten + 1114 word(s) 1114 2020-10-08 07:51:22 |
2 format correct Nora Tang -32 word(s) 1082 2021-04-20 10:45:04 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Kersten, B. Fagus sylvatica L. mitochondrial genome. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/8818 (accessed on 17 December 2025).
Kersten B. Fagus sylvatica L. mitochondrial genome. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/8818. Accessed December 17, 2025.
Kersten, Birgit. "Fagus sylvatica L. mitochondrial genome" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/8818 (accessed December 17, 2025).
Kersten, B. (2021, April 20). Fagus sylvatica L. mitochondrial genome. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/8818
Kersten, Birgit. "Fagus sylvatica L. mitochondrial genome." Encyclopedia. Web. 20 April, 2021.
Fagus sylvatica L. mitochondrial genome
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/plants9101274

Fagus sylvatica L., is one of the most important and widespread deciduous tree species in Central Europe and is widely managed for its hard wood. The complete DNA sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Fagus sylvatica L. was assembled and annotated based on Illumina MiSeq reads and validated using long reads from nanopore MinION sequencing. The genome assembled into a single DNA sequence of 504,715 bp in length containing 58 genes with predicted function, including 35 protein-coding, 20 tRNA and three rRNA genes. Additionally, 23 putative protein-coding genes were predicted supported by RNA-Seq data. Aiming at the development of taxon-specific mitochondrial genetic markers, the tool SNPtax was developed and applied to select genic SNPs potentially specific for different taxa within the Fagales. Further validation of a small SNP set resulted in the development of four CAPS markers specific for Fagus, Fagaceae, or Fagales, respectively, when considering over 100 individuals from a total of 69 species of deciduous trees and conifers from up to 15 families included in the marker validation. The CAPS marker set is suitable to identify the genus Fagus in DNA samples from tree tissues or wood products, including wood composite products. 

CAPS marker Fagaceae Fagales Fagus SNP genome assembly mitochondrial genome mitochondrial marker molecular marker taxon assignment

1. Fagus

Fagus is a genus of deciduous trees in the family Fagaceae (order Fagales), native to temperate Europe, Asia, and North America. The genus is divided into two subgenera, Engleriana and Fagus [1] and comprises 11 species (without ssp., var. and f.) [2]. As a naturally growing forest tree, European beech (F. sylvatica L.; subgenus Fagus) is among the most important and widespread tree species in Central Europe and is widely managed for its versatile hard wood. Because of the significance of the genus Fagus, genomic sequence resources are highly desired for this genus.

2. Fagus Genome Availability

Mishra et al. [3] published a 542 Mb nuclear draft genome sequence of an up to 300-year-old F. sylvatica individual (Bhaga) from an undisturbed stand in the Kellerwald-Edersee National Park in Central Germany. The assembly comprised 6451 scaffolds that are not yet assigned to any chromosomes. Complete chloroplast genomes are publicly available for F. sylvatica [4], F. engleriana [5], F. crenata [6], and F. japonica var. multinervis [7]. No complete mitochondrial genome sequence is available for any Fagus species to date [8]. In the entire order of the Fagales, only two assembled mitochondrial genome sequences are publicly available: one from Quercus variabilis (unverified sequence; GenBank MN199236) [9] and one from Betula pendula (GenBank LT855379.1) [10]; however, this sequence is not annotated so far.

3. Plant mitochondrial genomes 

Plant mitochondrial genomes are much larger than those of animals and highly variable in size [8][11][12][13][14][15][16]. They have low mutation rates, but have such high rearrangement rates that there is virtually no conservation of synteny [17][18][19][20][21][22]. The plasticity of plant mitochondrial genomes, leading to genome expansion, arises primarily from repeat sequences (including nontandem repeats of 50 bp and up), intron expansion, and incorporation of plastid and nuclear DNA [12][15][17][18][19][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The mitochondrial genome sequences of angiosperms generally have one or more pairs of large nontandem repeats (interspersed repeats) that can act as sites for inter- and intramolecular recombination, leading to multiple alternative arrangements (isoforms; including subgenomic forms) within a species [19]. Although plant mitochondrial genomes are often assembled and displayed as circular maps, plant mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) does most likely not exist as one large circular DNA molecule but mostly as a complex and dynamic collection of linear DNA with combinations of smaller circular and branched DNA molecules [12][14][15][17][19][26][29][30][31][32][33][34].

4. Development

DNA barcoding is an effective technique in molecular taxonomy. Sequences suggested to be useful in DNA barcoding include mtDNA (e.g., cox1 for animals), chloroplast DNA (e.g., rbcL, matK, trnL-trnF, ndhF, and atpB), and nuclear DNA (ITS and house-keeping genes, e.g., GAPDH; [35][36][37][38][39] among others). Chloroplast and mitochondrial genes are preferred over nuclear genes because most of the genes lack introns, and they are generally haploid [40]. Furthermore, each cell has many chloroplasts and mitochondria, and each one can contain several copies of the respective genome [41][42][43]. Thus, when sample tissue is limited, the chloroplast and the mitochondrion offer relatively abundant sources of DNA.

Advances in high-throughput sequencing (short read and single molecule long read sequencing) have promoted the assembly of complete DNA sequences of chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes and allowed for extending barcoding from single loci to whole genomes [44][45]. Especially, complete chloroplast genome (plastome) sequences provide valuable data sets to resolve complex evolutionary relationships in plastome phylogenies and improve resolution at lower taxonomic levels (e.g., [46][47]). Based on whole plastome alignments, genetic markers for species identification were developed in several studies (e.g., [44][48]).

The lower nucleotide substitution rate in mitochondrial compared to chloroplast genomes of land plants [17][18][19][20][21][22] often provides not enough variation at the species level, although a few mitochondrial markers for potential species differentiation were developed (e.g., [49]). However, nucleotide variants in mitochondrial genomes may provide promising targets for the development of DNA markers that are specific for higher taxonomic levels, such as genus, family or order.

European beech is often used in particle boards [50] and not always declared as it should be due to the European Timber Regulation that came into force in 2013 [51]. Although, species of the genus Fagus have not yet been added to the IUCN list [52] as “endangered” species (F. longipetiolata and F. hayatae classified as “vulnerable”), the specific ecosystems they form are in danger. Due to deforestation, old-growth forests are vanishing all over the world. Especially in Eastern Europe, the protected old forests consisting of oak, spruce, and beech have been declining during the last decades mostly because of human impact, i.e., mainly poor management practices and illegal logging of old valuable trees [53]. However, these forests play a key role for sustaining biodiversity and in climate change because they store a high amount of carbon for long time periods [53].

As a contribution to the preservation of valuable forest ecosystems, molecular markers can help to identify non-declared genera or species in different wood composite products. Identification of timber genera or species from solid wood products is much easier than from composite products as it may contain wood from many different genera or species. All the more important are molecular markers that are specific for a tree genus of interest ensuring a 100% classification probability (“golden markers”), and thus allowing for a doubtless identification of the related genus in wood composite products. To further increase the identification confidence in a tree genus, additional markers specific for higher taxonomic levels are highly desired. All potential taxon-specific markers should be validated in as many other tree species as possible (including species common in wood composite products).

References

  1. Renner, S.S.; Grimm, G.W.; Kapli, P.; Denk, T. Species relationships and divergence times in beeches: New insights from the inclusion of 53 young and old fossils in a birth-death clock model. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 371, 20150135.
  2. The Plant List. Available online: (accessed on 1 July 2020).
  3. Mishra, B.; Gupta, D.K.; Pfenninger, M.; Hickler, T.; Langer, E.; Nam, B.; Paule, J.; Sharma, R.; Ulaszewski, B.; Warmbier, J.; et al. A reference genome of the European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Gigascience 2018, 7, giy063.
  4. Mader, M.; Liesebach, H.; Liesebach, M.; Kersten, B. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Fagus sylvatica L. (Fagaceae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 1818–1819.
  5. Yang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Feng, L.; Zhou, T.; Bai, G.; Yang, J.; Zhao, G. Plastid Genome Comparative and Phylogenetic Analyses of the Key Genera in Fagaceae: Highlighting the Effect of Codon Composition Bias in Phylogenetic Inference. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 82.
  6. Worth, J.R.P.; Liu, L.; Wei, F.J.; Tomaru, N. The complete chloroplast genome of Fagus crenata (subgenus Fagus) and comparison with F. engleriana (subgenus Engleriana). PeerJ 2019, 7, e7026.
  7. Park, J.S.; Jin, D.P.; Park, J.W.; Choi, B.H. Complete chloroplast genome of Fagus multinervis, a beech species endemic to Ulleung Island in South Korea. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 1698–1699.
  8. Organelle Genome Resources at NCBI. Available online: (accessed on 1 July 2020).
  9. Bi, Q.X.; Li, D.X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, M.K.; Li, Y.C.; Liu, X.J.; Wang, L.B.; Yu, H.Y. Complete mitochondrial genome of Quercus. variabilis. (Fagales, Fagaceae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 3927–3928.
  10. Salojarvi, J.; Smolander, O.P.; Nieminen, K.; Rajaraman, S.; Safronov, O.; Safdari, P.; Lamminmaki, A.; Immanen, J.; Lan, T.Y.; Tanskanen, J.; et al. Genome sequencing and population genomic analyses provide insights into the adaptive landscape of silver birch. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 904–912.
  11. Gualberto, J.M.; Newton, K.J. Plant Mitochondrial Genomes: Dynamics and Mechanisms of Mutation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2017, 68, 225–252.
  12. Morley, S.A.; Nielsen, B.L. Plant mitochondrial DNA. Front. Biosci. Landmrk 2017, 22, 1023–1032.
  13. Ward, B.L.; Anderson, R.S.; Bendich, A.J. The Mitochondrial Genome Is Large and Variable in a Family of Plants (Cucurbitaceae). Cell 1981, 25, 793–803.
  14. Bendich, A.J. Structural analysis of mitochondrial DNA molecules from fungi and plants using moving pictures and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 255, 564–588.
  15. Oldenburg, D.J.; Bendich, A.J. DNA maintenance in plastids and mitochondria of plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 883.
  16. Bendich, A.J. The size and form of chromosomes are constant in the nucleus, but highly variable in bacteria, mitochondria and chloroplasts. BioEssays 2007, 29, 474–483.
  17. Palmer, J.D.; Herbon, L.A. Plant Mitochondrial-DNA Evolves Rapidly in Structure, but Slowly in Sequence. J. Mol. Evol. 1988, 28, 87–97.
  18. Richardson, A.O.; Rice, D.W.; Young, G.J.; Alverson, A.J.; Palmer, J.D. The “fossilized” mitochondrial genome of Liriodendron tulipifera: Ancestral gene content and order, ancestral editing sites, and extraordinarily low mutation rate. BMC Biol. 2013, 11, 29.
  19. Wynn, E.L.; Christensen, A.C. Repeats of Unusual Size in Plant Mitochondrial Genomes: Identification, Incidence and Evolution. G3-Genes Genom. Genet. 2019, 9, 549–559.
  20. Drouin, G.; Daoud, H.; Xia, J. Relative rates of synonymous substitutions in the mitochondrial, chloroplast and nuclear genomes of seed plants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 49, 827–831.
  21. Wolfe, K.H.; Li, W.H.; Sharp, P.M. Rates of Nucleotide Substitution Vary Greatly among Plant Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Nuclear Dnas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 9054–9058.
  22. Schuster, W.; Brennicke, A. The Plant Mitochondrial Genome-Physical Structure, Information-Content, Rna Editing, and Gene Migration to the Nucleus. Annu. Rev. Plant. Phys. 1994, 45, 61–78.
  23. Bullerwell, C.E.; Gray, M.W. Evolution of the mitochondrial genome: Protist connections to animals, fungi and plants. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2004, 7, 528–534.
  24. Bock, R. The give-and-take of DNA: Horizontal gene transfer in plants. Trends. Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 11–22.
  25. Kleine, T.; Maier, U.G.; Leister, D. DNA transfer from organelles to the nucleus: The idiosyncratic genetics of endosymbiosis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60, 115–138.
  26. Kozik, A.; Rowan, B.A.; Lavelle, D.; Berke, L.; Schranz, M.E.; Michelmore, R.W.; Christensen, A.C. The alternative reality of plant mitochondrial DNA: One ring does not rule them all. PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, e1008373.
  27. Dong, S.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yang, L.; Lang, X.; Zhang, S. The draft mitochondrial genome of Magnolia biondii and mitochondrial phylogenomics of angiosperms. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231020.
  28. Adams, K.L.; Palmer, J.D. Evolution of mitochondrial gene content: Gene loss and transfer to the nucleus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 29, 380–395.
  29. Tsujimura, M.; Kaneko, T.; Sakamoto, T.; Kimura, S.; Shigyo, M.; Yamagishi, H.; Terachi, T. Multichromosomal structure of the onion mitochondrial genome and a transcript analysis. Mitochondrion 2019, 46, 179–186.
  30. Backert, S.; Nielsen, B.L.; Borner, T. The mystery of the rings: Structure and replication of mitochondrial genomes from higher plants. Trends. Plant Sci. 1997, 2, 477–483.
  31. Backert, S.; Borner, T. Phage T4-like intermediates of DNA replication and recombination in the mitochondria of the higher plant Chenopodium album (L.). Curr. Genet. 2000, 37, 304–314.
  32. Sloan, D.B.; Alverson, A.J.; Chuckalovcak, J.P.; Wu, M.; McCauley, D.E.; Palmer, J.D.; Taylor, D.R. Rapid Evolution of Enormous, Multichromosomal Genomes in Flowering Plant Mitochondria with Exceptionally High Mutation Rates. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10, e1001241.
  33. Jacobs, M.A.; Payne, S.R.; Bendich, A.J. Moving pictures and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis show only linear mitochondrial DNA molecules from yeasts with linear-mapping and circular-mapping mitochondrial genomes. Curr. Genet. 1996, 30, 3–11.
  34. Hammani, K.; Giege, P. RNA metabolism in plant mitochondria. Trends. Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 380–389.
  35. Barcode of Life. Available online: (accessed on 1 July 2020).
  36. Hollingsworth, P.M.; Forrest, L.L.; Spouge, J.L.; Hajibabaei, M.; Ratnasingham, S.; van der Bank, M.; Chase, M.W.; Cowan, R.S.; Erickson, D.L.; Fazekas, A.J.; et al. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 12794–12797.
  37. Wang, Z.; Du, S.; Dayanandan, S.; Wang, D.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, J. Phylogeny reconstruction and hybrid analysis of Populus. (Salicaceae) based on nucleotide sequences of multiple single-copy nuclear genes and plastid fragments. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103645.
  38. Mader, M.; Pakull, B.; Blanc-Jolivet, C.; Paulini-Drewes, M.; Bouda, Z.H.; Degen, B.; Small, I.; Kersten, B. Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequences of Four Meliaceae Species and Comparative Analyses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 701.
  39. Fladung, M.; Schroeder, H.; Wehenkel, C.; Kersten, B. Differentiation of six Eucalyptus trees grown in Mexico by ITS and six chloroplast barcoding markers. Silvae Genet. 2015, 64, 121–130.
  40. Birky, C.W. Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes-Mechanisms and evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 11331–11338.
  41. Ahmad, N.; Nielsen, B.L. Plant Organelle DNA Maintenance. Plants 2020, 9, 683.
  42. Morley, S.A.; Ahmad, N.; Nielsen, B.L. Plant Organelle Genome Replication. Plants 2019, 8, 358.
  43. Oldenburg, D.J.; Kumar, R.A.; Bendich, A.J. The amount and integrity of mtDNA in maize decline with development. Planta 2013, 237, 603–617.
  44. Kersten, B.; Rampant, P.F.; Mader, M.; Le Paslier, M.C.; Bounon, R.; Berard, A.; Vettori, C.; Schroeder, H.; Leple, J.C.; Fladung, M. Genome Sequences of Populus. tremula. Chloroplast and Mitochondrion: Implications for Holistic Poplar Breeding. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147209.
  45. Li, X.; Yang, Y.; Henry, R.J.; Rossetto, M.; Wang, Y.; Chen, S. Plant DNA barcoding: From gene to genome. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2015, 90, 157–166.
  46. Nevill, P.G.; Zhong, X.; Tonti-Filippini, J.; Byrne, M.; Hislop, M.; Thiele, K.; van Leeuwen, S.; Boykin, L.M.; Small, I. Large scale genome skimming from herbarium material for accurate plant identification and phylogenomics. Plant Methods 2020, 16, 1.
  47. Saarela, J.M.; Burke, S.V.; Wysocki, W.P.; Barrett, M.D.; Clark, L.G.; Craine, J.M.; Peterson, P.M.; Soreng, R.J.; Vorontsova, M.S.; Duvall, M.R. A 250 plastome phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae): Topological support under different data partitions. PeerJ 2018, 6, e4299.
  48. Vaughn, J.N.; Chaluvadi, S.R.; Rangan, L.; Bennetzen, J.L. Whole Plastome Sequences from Five Ginger Species Facilitate Marker Development and Define Limits to Barcode Methodology. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108581.
  49. Kersten, B.; Voss, M.; Fladung, M. Development of mitochondrial SNP markers to differentiate Populus species. Trees–Struct. Funct. 2015, 29, 575–582.
  50. Koch, G.; Haag, V.; Heinz, I. Pflichtbewusstsein: EUTR und Holzwerkstoffe—Prüfungen am Thünen-Kompetenzzentrum Holzherkünfte. MDF. Mag. Co. 2015, 2015, 64–67.
  51. EU. European Timber Regulation Verordnung (EU) Nr. 995/2010 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 20; Oktober 2010 über die Verpflichtungen von Marktteilnehmern, die Holz und Holzerzeugnisse in Verkehr bringen; EU: Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
  52. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available online: (accessed on 3 July 2020).
  53. Knorn, J.; Kuemmerle, T.; Radeloff, V.C.; Keeton, W.S.; Gancz, V.; Biris, I.A.; Svoboda, M.; Griffiths, P.; Hagatis, A.; Hostert, P. Continued loss of temperate old-growth forests in the Romanian Carpathians despite an increasing protected area network. Environ. Conserv. 2013, 40, 182–193.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Plant Sciences
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : Birgit Kersten
View Times: 1.1K
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 20 Apr 2021
Table of Contents
    Notice
    You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
    OK
    Confirm
    Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
    Yes
    No
    ${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    There is no comment~
    ${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    ${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
    Submit
    Cancel
    Confirm
    Are you sure to Delete?
    Yes No
    Academic Video Service
    Feedback