Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 7830 word(s) 7830 2020-11-11 03:05:47 |
2 update layout and reference -2715 word(s) 5115 2021-02-18 05:28:57 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Catanzaro, E.; Fimognari, C. Marine Carotenoids Astaxanthin. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 22 June 2024).
Catanzaro E, Fimognari C. Marine Carotenoids Astaxanthin. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed June 22, 2024.
Catanzaro, Elena, Carmela Fimognari. "Marine Carotenoids Astaxanthin" Encyclopedia, (accessed June 22, 2024).
Catanzaro, E., & Fimognari, C. (2021, February 11). Marine Carotenoids Astaxanthin. In Encyclopedia.
Catanzaro, Elena and Carmela Fimognari. "Marine Carotenoids Astaxanthin." Encyclopedia. Web. 11 February, 2021.
Marine Carotenoids Astaxanthin

Photodamage is an umbrella term that includes general phototoxicity, photoaging, and cancer caused by UVR. All these phenomena are mediated by direct or indirect oxidative stress and inflammation and are strictly connected one to the other. Astaxanthin (ASX) is a peculiar marine carotenoids characterized by outstanding antioxidant properties. In particular, ASX has an exceptional efficacy in counteracting all categories of photodamages, in vitro and in vivo, thanks to both antioxidant potential and activation of different pathways.

Skin cancer Photodamage Marine organisms Carotenoids Astaxanthin

1. Introduction

Whether it is good weather or cloudy, every day we come into contact with ultraviolet radiation (UVR). UVR from the sun includes emissions with a wavelength range of 100–400 nm, which are divided into ultraviolet-A (UVA,315–400 nm), ultraviolet-B (UVB, 280–315 nm), and ultraviolet-C (UVC, 100–280 nm). As sunlight travels through the atmosphere, all UVC and roughly 90% of UVB are trapped and blocked by the ozone. Thus, mostly UVA and, in a smaller amount UVB, reach the Earth's surface [1].

If under medical supervision, small amounts of UVR could be beneficial to help to treat certain diseases, such as psoriasis and eczema, and are fundamental in vitamin D production; the extremely dangerous effects dictate an unbalance towards the risks on the risk-benefit ratio [2]. Indeed, UVR acts as both tumor initiator and promoter and, for this reason, is defined as a "complete carcinogen". It is also the primary amendable risk factor for skin cancer [2]. Both UVA and UVB generate DNA lesions but in different sites and different ways. UVB radiations have shorter wavelengths than UVA. For this reason, they are more energetic, but they cannot penetrate the deepest layers of the skin and stop at the dermal stratum. They act directly on cells’ DNA where they cause specific lesions, such as the formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), which interfere with cell replication and promote melanogenesis and immunosuppression [3][4]. Besides, UVA reaches the most profound skin tissues. It does not trigger direct DNA damage, but it supports oxidative damage by interacting with intracellular components, such as the chromophore riboflavin or membrane-bound enzymes. This interaction alters both oxidative and nitrosative homeostasis. As a consequence, on the one hand, the reactive species that are created, such as the hydroxyl radical (OH) or superoxide (O2), can interact with DNA, generating single-strand breaks; on the other hand, singlet oxygen (1O2) is generated and, in turn, oxidizes DNA bases [5].

Besides cancer, UVR is the main character in perpetuating photodamage in terms of phototoxicity and photoaging. UVR exposure induces different types of harms, depending on whether the dose is acute or chronic. Both acute and chronic effects involve mainly the skin, the immune system, and the eyes [1][2]. The visible manifestation of acute damage comprises tanning, sunburn, and erythema. What is not tangible is that already after a single exposure to UVR, the genetic alterations occur together with the development of an inflammatory status, which comprises the basis for photoaging, immunodepression, and severe pathologies, including the above-mentioned skin cancer [1][2]. Chronic UVR exposure allows the accumulation of such alterations and leads to degenerative and irreversible changes in cells, tissues, and blood vessels that, if perpetuated, easily translate into non-reversible events [1][2].

The best and most effective way to counteract skin cancer and, in general, photodamage is prevention. The best way to do so is the avoidance of UVR exposure [1]. The use of sunscreen lotions and clothes is the second most effective strategy. However, due to the rise of popularity of outdoor activities, the concept of a beautifying tan, the low compliance of sunscreen users, and the lack of correct and univocal information about UVR effects, it is challenging to achieve effective prevention [1].

The mid-ocean ridge covers 23% of the earth, of which only 3% has been explored. In other words, almost one-quarter of our planet is a single mountain range, and we did not enter it until after Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin performed the “giant leap for mankind”. Considering that 1600 years of ocean explorations costs can barely cover the expenses of a single year of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration [6], it is clear that research and technologies were advancing already in the 20th century, but people’s interest and, therefore, research has always been directed towards outer space instead of the deep sea [6]. Still, despite only very few parts of aquatic ecosystems having been explored, that 3% of known oceans currently represents a terrific source for natural agents with active biological activity.

Animals, plants, and even bacteria have been studied and used as a library where to search for new compounds that can counteract different pathologies. The marine environment is full of organisms that produce molecules with antioxidant activity, such as carotenoids that perfectly fit a photoprotective profile [7]. Algae synthesize and exploit carotenoids to pursue photosynthesis and protective roles against oxidative stress. Carotenoids are a heterogeneous class of tetraterpenoids that consist of 3–13 conjugates double bonds and, at times, of six carbon hydroxylated rings at one or both ends of the molecule. They fall into two categories, namely xanthophylls and carotenes. The first group is characterized by the presence of oxygen atoms and includes the marine astaxanthin (ASX) and fucoxanthin (FX) (Figures 1 and 2). Carotenes, on the contrary, are a pure hydrocarbons chain. The terrestrial β-carotene (BC) and lycopene belong to this class [8][9][10].

Thanks to their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, carotenoids showed to prevent UV-mediated skin phototoxicity, photoaging, and skin cancer [11]. Indeed, they can scavenge free radicals and inactivate 1O2. In particular, the presence of oxygenated carbon rings at the end of xanthophylls increases the effectiveness of singlet oxygen quenching [8][9][10].

Figure 1. Molecular structure and biological activity of astaxanthin versus UV-mediated damage.

2. Astaxanthin

Have you ever wondered why some crustaceans turn red when they are boiled? It is because of ASX. This carotenoid is stored in various crustaceans and other aquatic creatures fused into a protein complex known as crustacyanin. The intense and persistent heat of boiling water generates the liberation of free ASX, which confers the bright red color [19].

There are two primary natural sources of ASX: the microalgae that produce it and the numerous marine creatures that consume such algae, such as salmon, crustaceans, mollusks, and krill. Interestingly, the pink crustaceans, for which flamingos are greedy, confer the pink color to flamingos’ feathers.

Usually, algal carotenoids have a photoprotective or light-harvesting role, or both of them [20]. ASX synthesis happens as a defense mechanism whenever the microalga Haematococcus pluvialis is stressed, for instance, when it is not fully covered by water. On that occasion, the UVRs, that are usually screened by water, can damage its tissues and vital parts, and Haematococcus activates one of the few strategies to protect itself, producing antioxidant substances [21][22].

ASX is one of the most efficient natural antioxidants in both marine and terrestrial environments. It is 65 times more potent than ascorbic acid, 100 times more than BC, and 10 times more than tocopherol [23][24][25]. Moreover, unlike BC, ASX does not have a rebound prooxidant effect [26][27]. It is much more efficient than BC in quenching radical and non-radical reactive species, such as singlet oxygen, which are responsible for damage caused by sunlight [25][28][29]. These outstanding properties derive from its particular molecular structure. ASX consists of two polar moieties (ionone rings) linked by a long conjugated double bonds carbon chain that represents the non-polar part of the molecule (Figure 1). If the polar moieties directly quench free radicals or other oxidants, the long unsaturated ramified carbon chain allows electron delocalization. In this way, the antioxidant effect is synergized [30][31][32][33]. More, this particular layout will enable ASX to slip and position itself within the cellular membrane, precisely fitting the polar–non-polar structure of the double phospholipidic layers and conferring protections through the interception of reactive molecular species before they can reach the inside of cells [30].

ASX exhibits a wide-ranging biological activity, including antioxidant, anticancer, and anti-inflammatory effects [28] (Figure 1). For these reasons, it has been identified as a perfect agent to counteract all photoinduced damage and to concur to regulate skin homeostasis.

2.1. Astaxanthin and UV-mediated Skin Cancer

Given its high impact antioxidant properties, the role of ASX in cancer has been studied for a chemopreventive role more than as an antitumor agent. Different in vitro and in vivo models have been exploited to assess its potential in preventing tumorigenesis induced by both UVA and UVB radiations.

As mentioned above, the most common DNA lesion caused by UV, called "UV signature mutation," is the formation of CPDs. Upon exposure of DNA to UV, adjacent pyrimidines (CC, CT, or TT) create a saturated bond that, if not repaired, leads to those DNA mutations that initiate tumorigenesis [34]. UVB increases cutaneous ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity. ODC, the first enzyme in the polyamine-biosynthesis pathway, can cause sustained proliferation and clonal expansion of the initiated cells, leading to tumorigenesis [35]. For instance, high levels of ODC are crucial in promoting squamous cell carcinomas by driving the sustained proliferation and clonal expansion of v-Ha-ras–initiated cells [36]. In UV-exposed hairless mice, ASX negatively modulated the increased polyamine metabolism better than any other tested carotenoid, such as BC [37]. Furthermore, pretreatment with 5 µM ASX of human keratinocytes (HaCaT) 24 h before UVB exposure or a topical application of a 0.02% ASX gel after chronic UVB irradiation on male Wistar mice (3 irradiations per week per 4 weeks) impeded oxidative DNA damage [38][39].

Dermal fibroblasts are located within the dermis and hypodermis. For this reason, it is more probable that UVA more than UVB radiations reach these cells and create DNA lesions. ASX entirely prevented UVA-mediated DNA damage on a human skin fibroblast cell line (1BR-3) starting from 10 nM, 18 h prior 2 h of UVA irradiation. Predictably, this event was escorted by and probably due to ASX antioxidant activity [5].

To respond to UV-mediated insult due to the increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), the skin itself deploys non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants. Glutathione (GSH) is a tripeptide that shields cells from oxidative damage through self-oxidization. Thus, during oxidative stress, its reserves are depleted [40]. Differently, basal levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) are increased in response to superoxide formation [41][42]. ASX was able to respond to oxidative stress sustaining the physiological redox homeostasis. In particular, preincubation (18 h) with ASX 10 µM counteracted both the GSH depletion and the SOD enhancement that were triggered by UVA [5].

The same antioxidant and DNA-protective effects were recorded replacing ASX with an algal extract enriched in ASX. However, the extract was able to match the impact of ASX only at the dose containing a 103 higher concentration than that of synthetic ASX (10 µM versus 10 nM, respectively) [5]. Firsthand, this result is surprising, since usually, extracts have a higher biological impact than single molecules due to the synergistic activity of all the compounds that compose it [43][44]. However, the authors of the study suggested that the differential activity is to ascribe to the low bioavailability of ASX in the extract [5]. Moreover, since it is not specified, we also wonder which form both commercial ASX and ASX in the extract are, whether they are in a free or an ester form. Many studies showed that ASX in the form of ester (ASXE) has a more powerful chemopreventive and anticancer activity, and this could be a further explanation for the effect of the extract [25]. For instance, ASX mono- and di-esters (ASXM and ASXD) showed better anticancer protection than ASX on healthy albino Wistar rats exposed to a combination of UV and 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) treatment. All ASX forms (free and esters) were able to significantly reduce the formation of malignant papillomas and slow down the onset of neoplastic lesions. Still, the esters almost completely reversed UVA effects (versus 44% of lessened tumor incidence and 65% reduction in tumor burden recorded for ASX). Both ASX and ASXE were able to counteract lipid peroxidation, SOD increment, and GSH depletion. The interesting fact is that the mere antioxidant potential did not mirror the chemopreventive activity, as ASXE have a higher impact in reducing UV-mediated lipid peroxidation. Thus, the anticancer potential of ASX and ASXE is probably not entirely caused by the direct antioxidant activity as ROS quenchers [25].

Different studies show the ability of ASX to act not only as antioxidants but also to directly target other tumorigenic pathways. For instance, ASX and ASXE counteracted the rise of tyrosinase activity caused by UV-DMBA treatment in rats [25]. Tyrosinase activity is physiologically upregulated as a consequence of GSH shortage and sustains the malignant transformation of normal melanocytes [45]. Of note, shrimp waste containing ASX had antioxidant potential and was able to lower tyrosinase activity on human dermal fibroblast cells [46]. In the context of promoting the recycling and re-use of waste materials to minimize the environmental impact, this finding is remarkable. Furthermore, both acute and chronic exposure of our body to UVR causes inflammation. As a result of UV-induced stress, inflammatory cytokines are released, and a protumorigenic environment is established [28]. On UV-DMBA treated mice, both ASX and ASXE 100 μg/kg body weight were able, at least in part, to avoid an inflammatory status thanks to the ability to restore physiological neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio [25], which represent clinical markers of inflammation and prognostic factors in different tumor types [47][48].

It is well acknowledged that an immunosuppressive environment supports tumor formation and progression and that UV exposure promotes the suppression of the immune system and favor skin cancer development [49][50]. If there is no evidence about the ability of ASX to prevent or counteract UV-mediated immunosuppression, ASX’s general ability to boost the immune system has been highlighted in different studies. ASX boosted both humoral and cell-mediated immune response after polyvalent vaccination in beagle dogs and domestic shorthair cats [51][52]. Dogs were fed for 16 weeks with ASX 20 mg and at week 12, the polyvalent vaccine has been administered, while cats were fed for 12 weeks with ASX 10 mg and at week 8 the vaccine has been administered. In both animal models, ASX increased immune globulin (Ig) G production both pre- and post-vaccination but increased IgM production only after vaccination. A similar immunostimulant event occurs in murine spleen cells where ASX 20 nM increased IgG and IgM levels after 96 h treatment [53]. In dogs, but not in cats, ASX also mediated the cellular response increasing T-cell function, while in both cats and dogs it amplified natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxic activity both before and after vaccination [51][52].

The same effect on NK cytotoxic activity was recorded in humans’ blood after a daily intake of 8 mg of ASX for 8 weeks [54]. Besides, the intake of ASX 100 mg/kg/day per os for 4 days counteracted the decrease in NK cell activity due to restraint stress in mice [55]. In another study, BALB/c mice were fed with ASX (0.02%, 40 µg/kg body weight/day in a beadlet form) mixed in a chemically defined diet three weeks before subcutaneous inoculation with transplantable methylcholanthrene-induced fibrosarcoma (Meth-A tumor) cells. These cancerous cells convey a tumor antigen that triggers T cell-mediated immune responses in syngeneic mice. The ASX antitumor activity was accompanied by higher cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity and interferon-γ production by tumor-draining lymph node (TDLN) and spleen cells in the ASX-treated mice [56]. All these reports show that ASX boosts both humoral and cellular-mediated immune response in different models and represents the premises for the investigation of ASX's ability to counteract UV-mediated immunosuppression.

Furthermore, additional targets are hit by ASX that can concur with the mere antioxidant activity to confer the chemopreventive activity. The gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) is a system of aqueous channels that allow the communication between adjacent cells and the exchange of small metabolites to maintain tissue homeostasis. GIJC is involved in cell growth control and cancer progression [57][58]. A compromised GJIC characterizes many tumors, and its re-establishment supports the growth suppression of neoplastic foci [59]. Conflicting results have been recorded about the effect of ASX on GJIC. Concentrations of ASX higher than 0.1 µg/mL generated a detrimental reduction of GIJC on primary human fibroblasts, and this effect was reversed following ASX withdrawal [60]. However, two different ASX hydrosoluble derivatives, namely disodium disuccinate ASX and tetrasodium diphosphate ASX, upregulated GIJC on embryo fibroblasts from 0.001 to 0.1 µg/mL. At higher concentrations, such as 1 µg/mL, no modulation was recorded [61][62], excluding any detrimental effect. These controversial outcomes suggest that further studies are needed to sort this question out and highlight the necessity of assessing a risk/benefit analysis of this carotenoid.

To understand the ASX's potential therapeutic use, it is crucial to evaluate its toxicological profile. For the toxicological aspect of ASX, different outcomes have been generated in the past. A 22-year-old study [63] demonstrated that a diet containing 0.07% ASX exacerbated UV-induced tumorigenesis in female SKH-Hr-1 hairless mice, increasing the number of lesions and the rapid development of lethal complications. In the same study, a similar effect was recorded in animals fed with a diet containing 0.07% BC, but not in those fed with a diet containing 0.07% lycopene. However, as data about BC conflicted with many different studies, the authors of the study highlighted the importance of the diet in carotenoid bioavailability and hypothesized that dietary factors could interfere with ASX by fostering the protumorigenic effects [63]. Unfortunately, they did not measure the levels of ASX in serum or tissues to check the bioavailability nor perform the same experiment changing the diet of the experimental animals. For this reason, it is not possible to confirm this hypothesis. The latter study was the only one we found about ASX's protumorigenic potential, while its toxicological profile is typically very safe [24][64]. For instance, ASX and ASXE showed a favorable toxicological profile after oral administration at 100 and 200 μg/kg body weight to mice. No organ toxicity, changes in bodyweight, or behavior have been recorded together with unaffected biochemical serum parameters and skin homogenate profile [25].

ASX is commonly used as a food colorant and a supplement for its antioxidant activity and many other not scientifically confirmed uses. For this reason, very recently, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) carried out a scientific evaluation to assess the human health risks posed by ASX. Examining scientific literature, they concluded that the ingestion of 8 mg ASX per day is safe [65]. However, in the report, we could not find the protumorigenic effect that was depicted in the study mentioned above. Thus, it would be interesting to perform an epidemiological study to cross-correlate data about regular ASX consumers, type of diet, and skin tumors incidence.

Taken these results together, the outstanding direct antioxidant activity and the ability to modulate protumorigenic targets make ASX overpassing the antitumor potential of other carotenoids, such as BC and adonixanthin [25][29]. Nevertheless, clinical studies are certainly needed to confirm these impressive premises.

2.2. Astaxanthin, Photodamage, and Photoaging

2.2.1. Pre-Clinical Studies

As a consequence of UV irradiation, besides tumorigenesis, cells face an intense prooxidative and inflammatory reaction that gives rise to photodamage and photoaging. The most evident effect caused by acute toxic exposure to UVR is sunburn that manifests, for instance, as erythema [2]. As a result of sunburn, cells respond to the toxic insult by inducing apoptosis of damaged cells [66]. On HaCaT cells exposed to UVB, a 12 h-pretreatment with ASX (0.4–1 µM) was able to reduce oxidative stress via ROS quenching and counteract UVB-induced mitochondrial membrane depolarization and the consequential cell death [67]. Since the loss of mitochondrial potential is an early and irreversible event in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway [68], and as one of the most common triggers of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway is oxidative stress [69], ASX-mediated ROS quenching and apoptosis prevention were likely, at least in part, linked to each other.

Besides ROS, inflammatory stimuli can trigger UV-mediated apoptosis. When UVB reaches our body, keratinocytes which represent the first target act as sentinels, initiate the danger signal cascade. These events address the stress and promote apoptosis through the production of pro-apoptotic inflammatory factors, such as nitric oxide (NO) and the release of inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukins (ILs), migration inhibitory factor (MIF), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) [70][71][72]. Pretreatment or pre- and post-treatment of HaCaT cells with ASX at 5 µM reduced the upstream and downstream inflammatory response. It counteracted the increase in UVB-mediated inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and the production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Furthermore, ASX restrained the UVB-induced release of IL-1α [73], IL-1β [38], IL-6, IL-8 [73], TNF-α [38][73], and MIF [38]. As a consequence, ASX was able to prevent apoptosis of UVB-exposed HaCaT cells [38].

The same inflammation cascade caused by UVA and UVB is one of the causes of photoaging. It can lead to an altered epithelial-mesenchymal paracrine communication between epidermal keratinocyte and dermal fibroblasts [74][75][76]. Metalloproteinases (MMPs) are zinc-containing endopeptidases that favor the deterioration of the extracellular matrix (ECM). UVR, oxidative stress, and cytokines trigger their release from keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts. When UVR reaches the dermis, it directly triggers gene expression of metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1), which degrades collagen I fibers and other elastic ones altering the healthy skin structure [76]. The impaired ECM structure results in skin sagging and wrinkling, and in the worst-case scenario, it can initiate tumor cell invasion in photocarcinogenesis [77].

In parallel, UVB- and UVA-exposed-keratinocytes secrete IL-1α that triggers the release of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulatory factor (GM-CSF). Both IL-1α and GM-CSF reach the dermis and stimulate fibroblasts to secrete neutral endopeptidase (NEP), which in turn breaks the adjacent elastic fibers deteriorating the standard skin structure, reducing skin elasticity, and generating wrinkles [76]. Altogether, these events cause photoaging with various visible effects, such as wrinkles, dryness, and laxity [73][78][79].

ASX at 5 µM impeded MMP-1 secretion by dermal fibroblasts. In particular, epidermal keratinocyte pre-treated with ASX were exposed to UVB radiation. The medium was collected and then used to cultivate dermal fibroblasts, which, in turn, did not show any release of MMP-1, conversely to fibroblasts cultivated in UVB-exposed keratinocyte medium with no ASX treatment [73]. In a different study, it has been confirmed that ASX (1, 4 and 8 µM) blocks MMP-1 expression at gene and protein levels and blocked its enzymatic activity. This effect was accompanied by NEP inhibition. In a latter study, human fibroblasts were directly irradiated with UVA, and ASX was added after UV exposure [80]. This data is interesting because, as the authors of the study suggest, it excludes that only the antioxidant potential of ASX is responsible for its protective effect. Indeed, the most common and crucial reactive species have a life shorter than 4 µs [81], thus the effect of ASX post-treatment cannot be the result of its antioxidant activity. Besides, ASX post-treatment abrogated the release of GM-CSF and IL-1α in UVB-treated keratinocytes endorsing the alternative mechanism of action involving a cytokine release antagonism, instead of an antioxidant one [80].

On animals, the interesting photoprotective potential of ASX has been confirmed. Given that UVR causes skin damage through ROS formation, such as singlet oxygen, ASX would be expected to prevent UV-mediated skin damage. However, all ASX common preparations are high hydrophile in nature and not suitable for the common lipophile vehicle used for sunscreen. For this reason, a liposomal preparation was developed to include 6 mol% (% of the amount of ASX - expressed in moles - on the total amount of all constituents in the preparation) of ASX (Lipo-ASX). This preparation showed the same antioxidant properties of free ASX in terms of quenching singlet oxygen. Moreover, Lipo-ASX spread on Hos:HR-1 hairless mice dorsal skin before repeated UV irradiation overcame many morphological changes due to the UV-exposure, such as the thickness of the epidermal layer and cockle formation, as well as collagen destruction, preventing wrinkle formation. In parallel, transporting Lipo-ASX to the basal laminae through the creation of cationic liposomes containing ASX for iontophoretic transdermal delivery inhibited UV-melanin production, shielding melanocytes from UVR [82].

ASX's ability to prevent photodamage and photoaging has been confirmed in other models. UV-induced photoaging is a chronic process mostly driven by UVA. Komatsu and colleagues [83] tested chronic UVA exposure (20 J/cm3, 5 times per week for 70 days) on hairless Hos:HR-1 mice while fed with or without ASXME (0.01% or 0.1% of the AIN-93G diet) purified from Haematococcus pluvialis. The first useful finding is that ASX reached and accumulated in both dermis and epidermis, thus letting presume an activity on both levels. The overall effect of ASXME was the avoidance of wrinkles, water loss, and visible aging signs. Confirming the in vitro studies, the ability to prevent wrinkles is ascribed to ASX's ability to keep MMP-13, the mice analogous of human MMP-1, at the same levels of unexposed mice as well as to suppress the decrease of transglutaminase 2 (TGM2). Indeed, a reduction in TGM2 would lead to the decline of epidermal-dermal integrity since it favors protein-cross linking within collagen VII [83]. Starting from day 56, both ASX groups showed lesser dryness with respect to control, in terms of transepidermal water loss (TWEL), probably due to the ability to suppress the UV-mediated increase in lymphoepithelial Kazal-type-related inhibitor (LEKTI), steroid sulfatase (STS), and aquaporin 3 (AOP3), restoring physiological levels [83].

LEKTI is a serine protease inhibitor that inhibits other serine proteases, such as different human kallikrein (KLK) isoforms. KLKs regulates skin desquamation and inflammation and is a marker of skin cancer [84]. ASX also increased the content of two natural moisturizing factors (NMFs), pyroglutamic acid (PCA), and urocanic acid (UCA), as if UVA-exposure did not happen [83]. Both STS and AOP3 play crucial roles in desquamation and water loss [85][86].

Topic application of a gel containing ASX on UVB-exposed Wistar mice significantly reduced photoaging effects. Mice received increasing energetic UVB irradiation for four weeks (50 mJ/cm2 week 1; 70mJ/cm2 week 2; 80 mJ/cm2 weeks 3 and 4), three times per week. A 0.02% ASX gel was applied on mice 20 min before and 4 h after irradiation. ASX, as usual, suppressed UVB-induced MMP-1 and counteracted the degradation of collagen fibers [39].

In another study, HR-1 hairless mice underwent UVA for 8 weeks. UVA intensity was increased to reach 100 mJ/cm2 in 4 weeks. ASX was introduced in the diet at 100 mg/kg body weight. The supplementation decreased the visible sign of photoaging as wrinkling and skin thickening and maintained physiological ROS levels. Moreover, ASX increased collagen density overcoming non-irradiated group levels. It also prevented the reduction of capillaries diameter on UV-exposed skin through the upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the downregulation of thrombospondin 1 (TSP-1) [87]. As the reduction of capillaries is correlated to ROS-mediated endothelial apoptosis [88], this data comes towards ASX's ability to prevent photocarcinogenesis, photodamage, and photoaging.

2.2.2. Clinical Studies

Since animal studies did not highlight any relevant toxic effect after acute or chronic UVA or UVB exposure, it was possible to proceed with studies on humans.

The American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines the minimal erythemal dose (MED) as “the smallest UV dose that produces perceptible redness of the skin (erythema) with clearly defined borders at 16 to 24 h after UV exposure”. The ratio between MED of protected skin (MEDp), for instance with sunscreen, and MED of unprotected skin (MEDu) represents the famous sun protective factor (SPF) that is found on every sunscreen container [89].

To assess the effect of ASX on MED in humans, Ito et al. [90] performed a study in which 11 human subjects consumed 4 mg of ASX for 9 weeks. Then, small parts of their back were irradiated with UVB lamps, and their MED was compared to the one of the placebo group and to their MED measured irradiating their skin before the beginning of ASX supplementation. ASX administration significantly increased MED, which resulted 5 times higher than that observed in the placebo group. ASX supplementation also attenuated the UV-induced decrease in moisture in healthy subjects [90]. The only limitation of this promising study is the number of subjects recruited for the study. If these results were confirmed on a higher number of people, data would be more robust and pave the way for the use of ASX as a sunburn protector.

Different clinical studies have been performed to investigate ASX potential to prevent or cure photoaging signs. For these studies, no artificial UVR was applied to human subjects, but the effect of ASX supplementation in a standard skin deterioration scenario has been investigated. In a clinical trial involving 59 healthy female participants in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial [73], two groups of 22 and 19 individuals received oral supplementation of 6 or 12 mg of ASX per day for 16 weeks, respectively. The remaining 18 people constituted the placebo group. Only at the end of 16 weeks some difference between the placebo group and the treated one was noticed. Wrinkle depths (measured through pictures of subjects and instrumental analysis), skin elasticity, and moisture were stable for both ASX groups, while deterioration was recorded for the placebo group. Furthermore, only the higher supplementation dose was able to maintain IL-1α levels steady from day 0 to week 16, while in both placebo and 6 mg ASX groups, those levels increased [73]. Of note, although the study did not show any toxic effect, an intake of 12 mg per day exceeded EFSA recommendations [65].

One study took place from August to December 2015 in Osaka [73], when the UV index (UVI) ranged from 6.6 and 2.0 [91]. UVI is an easy way to address the level of UV radiation. The World and Health Organization (WHO) states that until UVI 3, no protective measures are needed. Above 3, protection is necessary, and above 8 those protections should be reinforced [1]. In this study, 3 months of experimentation fall into the moderate category, and the other 2 in the low group [91]. This was the only study where the investigators specified both period of the year and city where the study took place. Still, this detail would be interesting to uniform and understand the applicability of the different studies outcomes. What emerges from this study and some similar ones is that ASX administration prevented general photoaging in terms of wrinkle, dryness, and elasticity at a dose ranging from 2 to 12 mg per day [73][92][93][94][95] and that ASX supplementation was safe during the whole duration of the study (16 weeks) at 12 mg/day. For instance, no alteration in blood or in the function of the liver, kidney, and serum cholesterol has been recorded [73]. An uncontrolled trial showed that a concomitant oral assumption of 6 mg ASX, together with topical use of a preparation containing the same carotenoid (78.9 µM) promoted a better effect on the same photoaging markers [93].

Whether the majority of these studies agree that ASX can prevent the formation of UV-related skin markers, research conducted by Chalyk et al. [94] claimed that ASX 4 mg orally taken for 4 weeks actively counteracted the pre-existing effect of photo- and physiological-aging. The residual skin analysis showed a decrease in corneocyte desquamation, and the blood test showed lower systemic malondialdehyde levels, which represent a marker of oxidative stress [94]. These promising results are not conclusive and, for sure, have to be confirmed. Indeed, usually, for all other reports we considered in this review, ASX's effect was visible following an extended period of supplementation (at least 16 weeks). Furthermore, we agree with Ng et al. [96] who, in their systematic review, point out that all these clinical studies are not without flaws. Whether because of the lack of placebo and/or control groups, or the low participant number, data are not conclusive. In addition, most of the research on humans has been funded by commercial entities, and a bias due to conflict of interests cannot be excluded [96].

Overall, more structured clinical studies are needed to understand the real photoprotective potential of ASX. 


  1. Global Solar UV Index: A Practical Guide. Available online: (accessed on 7 May 2020).
  2. D’Orazio, J.; Jarrett, S.; Amaro-Ortiz, A.; Scott, T. UV radiation and the skin. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 12222–12248, doi:10.3390/ijms140612222.
  3. Eller, M.S.; Ostrom, K.; Gilchrest, B.A. DNA damage enhances melanogenesis. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 1087–1092, doi:10.1073/pnas.93.3.1087.
  4. Damian, D.L.; Barnetson, R.S.; Halliday, G.M. Effects of low-dose ultraviolet radiation on in vivo human cutaneous recall responses. J. Dermatol. 2001, 42, 161–167, doi:10.1046/j.1440-0960.2001.00507.x.
  5. Lyons, N.M.; O’Brien, N.M. Modulatory effects of an algal extract containing astaxanthin on UVA-irradiated cells in culture. Dermatol. Sci. 2002, 30, 73–84, doi:10.1016/S0923-1811(02)00063-4.
  6. Ballard, R. The Astonishing Hidden World of the Deep Ocean. Available online: (accessed on 28 April 2020).
  7. Catanzaro, E.; Calcabrini, C.; Bishayee, A.; Fimognari, C. Antitumor Potential of Marine and Freshwater Lectins. Drugs 2019, 18, 1–40, doi:10.3390/md18010011.
  8. Decker, E.A. Natural antioxidants in foods. In Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, 3rd ed.; Meyers, R.A., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 335–342. ISBN 978-0-12-227410-7.
  9. Hammond, B.R.; Renzi, L.M. Carotenoids. Nutr. Bethesda Md 2013, 4, 474–476, doi:10.3945/an.113.004028.
  10. Merhan, O. The biochemistry and antioxidant properties of carotenoids. In Carotenoids; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2017; pp. 51–66.
  11. Shimoda, H.; Tanaka, J.; Shan, S.-J.; Maoka, T. Anti-pigmentary activity of fucoxanthin and its influence on skin mRNA expression of melanogenic molecules. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2010, 62, 1137–1145, doi:10.1111/j.2042-7158.2010.01139.x.
  12. Mularczyk, M.; Michalak, I.; Marycz, K. Astaxanthin and other Nutrients from Haematococcus pluvialis-Multifunctional Applications. Drugs 2020, 18, doi:10.3390/md18090459.
  13. Wong, S.K.; Ima-Nirwana, S.; Chin, K.-Y. Effects of astaxanthin on the protection of muscle health (Review). Ther. Med. 2020, 20, 2941–2952, doi:10.3892/etm.2020.9075.
  14. Genç, Y.; Bardakci, H.; Yücel, Ç.; Karatoprak, G.Ş.; Küpeli Akkol, E.; Hakan Barak, T.; Sobarzo-Sánchez, E. Oxidative Stress and Marine Carotenoids: Application by Using Nanoformulations. Drugs 2020, 18, doi:10.3390/md18080423.
  15. Xia, W.; Tang, N.; Kord-Varkaneh, H.; Low, T.Y.; Tan, S.C.; Wu, X.; Zhu, Y. The effects of astaxanthin supplementation on obesity, blood pressure, CRP, glycemic biomarkers, and lipid profile: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Res. 2020, 161, 105113, doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105113.
  16. Li, J.; Guo, C.; Wu, J. Astaxanthin in Liver Health and Disease: A Potential Therapeutic Agent. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2020, 14, 2275–2285, doi:10.2147/DDDT.S230749.
  17. Hentati, F.; Tounsi, L.; Djomdi, D.; Pierre, G.; Delattre, C.; Ursu, A.V.; Fendri, I.; Abdelkafi, S.; Michaud, P. Bioactive Polysaccharides from Seaweeds. Basel Switz. 2020, 25, doi:10.3390/molecules25143152.
  18. Bae, M.; Kim, M.-B.; Park, Y.-K.; Lee, J.-Y. Health benefits of fucoxanthin in the prevention of chronic diseases. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2020, 1865, 158618, doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2020.158618.
  19. Begum, S.; Cianci, M.; Durbeej, B.; Falklöf, O.; Hädener, A.; Helliwell, J.R.; Helliwell, M.; Regan, A.C.; Watt, C.I.F. On the origin and variation of colors in lobster carapace. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 16723–16732, doi:10.1039/C4CP06124A.
  20. Horton, P.; Ruban, A. Molecular design of the photosystem II light-harvesting antenna: Photosynthesis and photoprotection. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 365–373, doi:10.1093/jxb/eri023.
  21. Udayan, A.; Arumugam, M.; Pandey, A. Nutraceuticals from algae and cyanobacteria. In Algal Green Chemistry; Rastogi, R.P., Madamwar, D., Pandey, A., Eds.; Recent process in biotechnologies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 65–89. ISBN 978-0-444-63784-0.
  22. Schoefs, B.; Rmiki, N.-E.; Rachadi, J.; Lemoine, Y. Astaxanthin accumulation in Haematococcus requires a cytochrome P450 hydroxylase and an active synthesis of fatty acids. FEBS Lett. 2001, 500, 125–128, doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02596-0.
  23. Yuan, J.-P.; Chen, F. Hydrolysis kinetics of astaxanthin esters and stability of astaxanthin of Haematococcus pluvialis during saponification. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 31–35, doi:10.1021/jf980465x.
  24. Stewart, J.S.; Lignell, A.; Pettersson, A.; Elfving, E.; Soni, M.G. Safety assessment of Astaxanthin-rich microalgae biomass: Acute and subchronic toxicity studies in rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. Int. J. Publ. Br. Ind. Biol. Res. Assoc. 2008, 46, 3030–3036, doi:10.1016/j.fct.2008.05.038.
  25. Rao, A.R.; Sindhuja, H.N.; Dharmesh, S.M.; Sankar, K.U.; Sarada, R.; Ravishankar, G.A. Effective inhibition of skin cancer, tyrosinase, and antioxidative properties by astaxanthin and astaxanthin esters from the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 3842–3851, doi:10.1021/jf304609j.
  26. Palozza, P.; Serini, S.; Di Nicuolo, F.; Piccioni, E.; Calviello, G. Prooxidant effects of beta-carotene in cultured cells. Aspects Med. 2003, 24, 353–362, doi:10.1016/s0098-2997(03)00031-1.
  27. Martin, H.-D.; Jäger, C.; Ruck, C.; Schmidt, M.; Walsh, R.; Paust, J. Anti- and Prooxidant Properties of Carotenoids. Für Prakt. Chem. 1999, 341, 302–308, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3897(199904)341:3<302::AID-PRAC302>3.0.CO;2-6.
  28. Davinelli, S.; Nielsen, M.E.; Scapagnini, G. Astaxanthin in skin health, repair, and disease: A comprehensive review. Nutrients 2018, 10, doi:10.3390/nu10040522.
  29. Maoka, T.; Yasui, H.; Ohmori, A.; Tokuda, H.; Suzuki, N.; Osawa, A.; Shindo, K.; Ishibashi, T. Anti-oxidative, anti-tumor-promoting, and anti-carcinogenic activities of adonirubin and adonixanthin. Oleo Sci. 2013, 62, 181–186, doi:10.5650/jos.62.181.
  30. Kidd, P. Astaxanthin, cell membrane nutrient with diverse clinical benefits and anti-aging potential. Med. Rev. J. Clin. Ther. 2011, 16, 355–364.
  31. Goto, S.; Kogure, K.; Abe, K.; Kimata, Y.; Kitahama, K.; Yamashita, E.; Terada, H. Efficient radical trapping at the surface and inside the phospholipid membrane is responsible for highly potent antiperoxidative activity of the carotenoid astaxanthin. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1512, 251–258, doi:10.1016/s0005-2736(01)00326-1.
  32. Britton, G. Structure and properties of carotenoids in relation to function. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1995, 9, 1551–1558.
  33. Pashkow, F.J.; Watumull, D.G.; Campbell, C.L. Astaxanthin: A novel potential treatment for oxidative stress and inflammation in cardiovascular disease. J. Cardiol. 2008, 101, 58D–68D, doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.010.
  34. Matsumura, Y.; Ananthaswamy, H.N. Short-term and long-term cellular and molecular events following UV irradiation of skin: Implications for molecular medicine. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2002, 4, 1–22, doi:10.1017/S146239940200532X.
  35. Tang, X.; Kim, A.L.; Feith, D.J.; Pegg, A.E.; Russo, J.; Zhang, H.; Aszterbaum, M.; Kopelovich, L.; Epstein, E.H.; Bickers, D.R.; et al. Ornithine decarboxylase is a target for chemoprevention of basal and squamous cell carcinomas in Ptch1+/- mice. Clin. Investig. 2004, 113, 867–875, doi:10.1172/JCI20732.
  36. Smith, M.K.; Trempus, C.S.; Gilmour, S.K. Co-operation between follicular ornithine decarboxylase and v-Ha-ras induces spontaneous papillomas and malignant conversion in transgenic skin. Carcinogenesis 1998, 19, 1409–1415, doi:10.1093/carcin/19.8.1409.
  37. Savouré, N.; Briand, G.; Amory-Touz, M.C.; Combre, A.; Maudet, M.; Nicol, M. Vitamin A status and metabolism of cutaneous polyamines in the hairless mouse after UV irradiation: Action of beta-carotene and astaxanthin. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. Int. Z. Vitam. Ernahrungsforschung J. Int. Vitaminol. Nutr. 1995, 65, 79–86.
  38. Yoshihisa, Y.; Rehman, M.U.; Shimizu, T. Astaxanthin, a xanthophyll carotenoid, inhibits ultraviolet-induced apoptosis in keratinocytes. Dermatol. 2014, 23, 178–183, doi:10.1111/exd.12347.
  39. Wiraguna, A.A.G.P.; Pangkahila, W.; Astawa, I.N.M. Antioxidant properties of topical Caulerpa sp. extract on UVB-induced photoaging in mice. Rep. 2018, 10, 7597, doi:10.4081/dr.2018.7597.
  40. Chen, L.; Hu, J.Y.; Wang, S.Q. The role of antioxidants in photoprotection: A critical review. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2012, 67, 1013–1024, doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.009.
  41. Poswig, A.; Wenk, J.; Brenneisen, P.; Wlaschek, M.; Hommel, C.; Quel, G.; Faisst, K.; Dissemond, J.; Krieg, T.; Scharffetter-Kochanek, K.; et al. Adaptive antioxidant response of manganese-superoxide dismutase following repetitive UVA irradiation. Investig. Dermatol. 1999, 112, 13–18, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00465.x.
  42. Meewes, C.; Brenneisen, P.; Wenk, J.; Kuhr, L.; Ma, W.; Alikoski, J.; Poswig, A.; Krieg, T.; Scharffetter-Kochanek, K. Adaptive antioxidant response protects dermal fibroblasts from UVA-induced phototoxicity. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 30, 238–247, doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(00)00463-9.
  43. Fimognari, C.; Lenzi, M.; Ferruzzi, L.; Turrini, E.; Scartezzini, P.; Poli, F.; Gotti, R.; Guerrini, A.; Carulli, G.; Ottaviano, V.; et al. Mitochondrial pathway mediates the antileukemic effects of hemidesmus indicus, a promising botanical drug. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21544, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021544.
  44. Rasoanaivo, P.; Wright, C.W.; Willcox, M.L.; Gilbert, B. Whole plant extracts versus single compounds for the treatment of malaria: Synergy and positive interactions. J. 2011, 10 (Suppl. 1), S4, doi:10.1186/1475-2875-10-S1-S4.
  45. Baum, A.; Cohen, L. Successful behavioral interventions to prevent cancer: The example of skin cancer. Rev. Public Health 1998, 19, 319–333, doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.319.
  46. Chintong, S.; Phatvej, W.; Rerk-Am, U.; Waiprib, Y.; Klaypradit, W. In vitro antioxidant, antityrosinase, and cytotoxic activities of Astaxanthin from Shrimp Waste. Basel Switz. 2019, 8, doi:10.3390/antiox8050128.
  47. Cuello-López, J.; Fidalgo-Zapata, A.; López-Agudelo, L.; Vásquez-Trespalacios, E. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive factor of complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207224, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207224.
  48. Faria, S.S.; Fernandes, P.C.; Silva, M.J.B.; Lima, V.C.; Fontes, W.; Freitas-Junior, R.; Eterovic, A.K.; Forget, P. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: A narrative review. Ecancermedicalscience 2016, 10, 702, doi:10.3332/ecancer.2016.702.
  49. Rangwala, S.; Tsai, K.Y. Roles of the immune system in skin cancer. J. Dermatol. 2011, 165, 953–965, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10507.x.
  50. Hart, P.H.; Norval, M. Ultraviolet radiation-induced immunosuppression and its relevance for skin carcinogenesis. Photobiol. Sci. Off. J. Eur. Photochem. Assoc. Eur. Soc. Photobiol. 2018, 17, 1872–1884, doi:10.1039/c7pp00312a.
  51. Chew, B.P.; Mathison, B.D.; Hayek, M.G.; Massimino, S.; Reinhart, G.A.; Park, J.S. Dietary astaxanthin enhances immune response in dogs. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2011, 140, 199–206, doi:10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.12.004.
  52. Park, J.S.; Mathison, B.D.; Hayek, M.G.; Massimino, S.; Reinhart, G.A.; Chew, B.P. Astaxanthin stimulates cell-mediated and humoral immune responses in cats. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2011, 144, 455–461, doi:10.1016/j.vetimm.2011.08.019.
  53. Okai, Y.; Higashi-Okai, K. Possible immunomodulating activities of carotenoids in in vitro cell culture experiments. J. Immunopharmacol. 1996, 18, 753–758, doi:10.1016/s0192-0561(97)85558-0.
  54. Park, J.S.; Chyun, J.H.; Kim, Y.K.; Line, L.L.; Chew, B.P. Astaxanthin decreased oxidative stress and inflammation and enhanced immune response in humans. Metab. 2010, 7, 18, doi:10.1186/1743-7075-7-18.
  55. Kurihara, H.; Koda, H.; Asami, S.; Kiso, Y.; Tanaka, T. Contribution of the antioxidative property of astaxanthin to its protective effect on the promotion of cancer metastasis in mice treated with restraint stress. Life Sci. 2002, 70, 2509–2520, doi:10.1016/s0024-3205(02)01522-9.
  56. Jyonouchi, H.; Sun, S.; Iijima, K.; Gross, M.D. Antitumor activity of astaxanthin and its mode of action. Cancer 2000, 36, 59–65, doi:10.1207/S15327914NC3601_9.
  57. Krutovskikh, V.A.; Piccoli, C.; Yamasaki, H.; Yamasaki, H. Gap junction intercellular communication propagates cell death in cancerous cells. Oncogene 2002, 21, 1989–1999, doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1205187.
  58. Mesnil, M.; Crespin, S.; Avanzo, J.-L.; Zaidan-Dagli, M.-L. Defective gap junctional intercellular communication in the carcinogenic process. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1719, 125–145, doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.11.004.
  59. Stahl, W.; Sies, H. The role of carotenoids and retinoids in gap junctional communication. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. Int. Z. Vitam. Ernahrungsforschung J. Int. Vitaminol. Nutr. 1998, 68, 354–359.
  60. Daubrawa, F.; Sies, H.; Stahl, W. Astaxanthin diminishes gap junctional intercellular communication in primary human fibroblasts. Nutr. 2005, 135, 2507–2511, doi:10.1093/jn/135.11.2507.
  61. Hix, L.M.; Frey, D.A.; McLaws, M.D.; Østerlie, M.; Lockwood, S.F.; Bertram, J.S. Inhibition of chemically-induced neoplastic transformation by a novel tetrasodium diphosphate astaxanthin derivative. Carcinogenesis 2005, 26, 1634–1641, doi:10.1093/carcin/bgi121.
  62. Zhang, L.X.; Acevedo, P.; Guo, H.; Bertram, J.S. Upregulation of gap junctional communication and connexin43 gene expression by carotenoids in human dermal fibroblasts but not in human keratinocytes. Carcinog. 1995, 12, 50–58, doi:10.1002/mc.2940120108.
  63. Black, H.S. Radical interception by carotenoids and effects on UV carcinogenesis. Cancer 1998, 31, 212–217, doi:10.1080/01635589809514705.
  64. Spiller, G.A.; Dewell, A. Safety of an Astaxanthin-rich Haematococcus pluvialis algal extract: A randomized clinical trial. Med. Food 2003, 6, 51–56, doi:10.1089/109662003765184741.
  65. Turck, D.; Castenmiller, J.; Henauw, S. de; Hirsch‐Ernst, K.I.; Kearney, J.; Maciuk, A.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.J.; Naska, A.; Pelaez, C.; et al. Safety of Astaxanthin for its use as a novel food in food supplements. EFSA J. 2020, 18, e05993, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5993.
  66. Khalil, C.; Shebaby, W. UVB damage onset and progression 24 h post exposure in human-derived skin cells. Rep. 2017, 4, 441–449, doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.07.008.
  67. Hu, F.; Liu, W.; Yan, L.; Kong, F.; Wei, K. Optimization and characterization of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles loaded with astaxanthin and evaluation of anti-photodamage effect in vitro. Soc. Open Sci. 2019, 6, 191184, doi:10.1098/rsos.191184.
  68. Tait, S.W.G.; Green, D.R. Mitochondria and cell death: Outer membrane permeabilization and beyond. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 621–632, doi:10.1038/nrm2952.
  69. Redza-Dutordoir, M.; Averill-Bates, D.A. Activation of apoptosis signalling pathways by reactive oxygen species. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Res. 2016, 1863, 2977–2992, doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.09.012.
  70. Grandjean-Laquerriere, A.; Gangloff, S.C.; Le Naour, R.; Trentesaux, C.; Hornebeck, W.; Guenounou, M. Relative contribution of NF-kappaB and AP-1 in the modulation by curcumin and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate of the UVB-induced cytokine expression by keratinocytes. Cytokine 2002, 18, 168–177, doi:10.1006/cyto.2002.0888.
  71. Honda, A.; Abe, R.; Yoshihisa, Y.; Makino, T.; Matsunaga, K.; Nishihira, J.; Shimizu, H.; Shimizu, T. Deficient deletion of apoptotic cells by macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) overexpression accelerates photocarcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 2009, 30, 1597–1605, doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp160.
  72. Zhang, H.; Joseph, J.; Feix, J.; Hogg, N.; Kalyanaraman, B. Nitration and oxidation of a hydrophobic tyrosine probe by peroxynitrite in membranes:  comparison with nitration and oxidation of tyrosine by peroxynitrite in aqueous solution. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 7675–7686, doi:10.1021/bi002958c.
  73. Tominaga, K.; Hongo, N.; Fujishita, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Adachi, Y. Protective effects of Astaxanthin on skin deterioration. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 2017, 61, 33–39, doi:10.3164/jcbn.17-35.
  74. Fisher, G.J.; Datta, S.C.; Talwar, H.S.; Wang, Z.Q.; Varani, J.; Kang, S.; Voorhees, J.J. Molecular basis of sun-induced premature skin ageing and retinoid antagonism. Nature 1996, 379, 335–339, doi:10.1038/379335a0.
  75. Rabe, J.H.; Mamelak, A.J.; McElgunn, P.J.S.; Morison, W.L.; Sauder, D.N. Photoaging: Mechanisms and repair. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2006, 55, 1–19, doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2005.05.010.
  76. Imokawa, G.; Nakajima, H.; Ishida, K. Biological mechanisms underlying the ultraviolet radiation-induced formation of skin wrinkling and sagging II: Over-expression of neprilysin plays an essential role. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 7776–7795, doi:10.3390/ijms16047776.
  77. Pittayapruek, P.; Meephansan, J.; Prapapan, O.; Komine, M.; Ohtsuki, M. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in photoaging and photocarcinogenesis. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, doi:10.3390/ijms17060868.
  78. Gilchrest, B.A.; Yaar, M. Ageing and photoageing of the skin: Observations at the cellular and molecular level. J. Dermatol. 1992, 127 (Suppl. 41), 25–30, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1992.tb16984.x.
  79. Gilchrest, B.A. A review of skin ageing and its medical therapy. J. Dermatol. 1996, 135, 867–875, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.1996.d01-1088.x.
  80. Nakajima, H.; Terazawa, S.; Niwano, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Imokawa, G. The inhibitory effects of anti-oxidants on ultraviolet-induced up-regulation of the wrinkling-inducing enzyme neutral endopeptidase in human fibroblasts. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161580, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161580.
  81. Redmond, R.W.; Kochevar, I.E. Spatially resolved cellular responses to singlet oxygen. Photobiol. 2006, 82, 1178–1186, doi:10.1562/2006-04-14-IR-874.
  82. Hama, S.; Takahashi, K.; Inai, Y.; Shiota, K.; Sakamoto, R.; Yamada, A.; Tsuchiya, H.; Kanamura, K.; Yamashita, E.; Kogure, K. Protective effects of topical application of a poorly soluble antioxidant astaxanthin liposomal formulation on ultraviolet-induced skin damage. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 101, 2909–2916, doi:10.1002/jps.23216.
  83. Komatsu, T.; Sasaki, S.; Manabe, Y.; Hirata, T.; Sugawara, T. Preventive effect of dietary astaxanthin on UVA-induced skin photoaging in hairless mice. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171178, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171178.
  84. Nauroy, P.; Nyström, A. Kallikreins: Essential epidermal messengers for regulation of the skin microenvironment during homeostasis, repair and disease. Matrix Biol. Plus 2020, 6–7, 100019, doi:10.1016/j.mbplus.2019.100019.
  85. Elias, P.M.; Williams, M.L.; Choi, E.-H.; Feingold, K.R. Role of cholesterol sulfate in epidermal structure and function: Lessons from X-linked ichthyosis. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1841, 353–361, doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2013.11.009.
  86. Nakahigashi, K.; Kabashima, K.; Ikoma, A.; Verkman, A.S.; Miyachi, Y.; Hara-Chikuma, M. Upregulation of aquaporin-3 is involved in keratinocyte proliferation and epidermal hyperplasia. Investig. Dermatol. 2011, 131, 865–873, doi:10.1038/jid.2010.395.
  87. Li, X.; Matsumoto, T.; Takuwa, M.; Saeed Ebrahim Shaiku Ali, M.; Hirabashi, T.; Kondo, H.; Fujino, H. Protective effects of astaxanthin supplementation against ultraviolet-induced photoaging in hairless mice. Biomedicines 2020, 8, doi:10.3390/biomedicines8020018.
  88. Deng, M.; Xu, Y.; Yu, Z.; Wang, X.; Cai, Y.; Zheng, H.; Li, W.; Zhang, W. Protective effect of fat extract on UVB-induced photoaging in vitro and in vivo. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, eCollection 2019, e6146942, doi:10.1155/2019/6146942.
  89. CFR—Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Available online: (accessed on 12 July 2020).
  90. Ito, N.; Seki, S.; Ueda, F. The protective role of Astaxanthin for UV-induced skin deterioration in healthy people-a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrients 2018, 10, doi:10.3390/nu10070817.
  91. Japan Meteorological Agency | Grafico della variazione annuale dell’indice UV massimo annuale (valore di analisi). Available online: (accessed on 9 May 2020).
  92. Yamashita, E.Y. The effects of a dietary supplement containing Astaxanthin on skin condition. Sci. 2006, 10, 6.
  93. Tominaga, K.; Hongo, N.; Karato, M.; Yamashita, E. Cosmetic benefits of astaxanthin on humans subjects. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2012, 59, 43–47.
  94. Chalyk, N.E.; Klochkov, V.A.; Bandaletova, T.Y.; Kyle, N.H.; Petyaev, I.M. Continuous Astaxanthin intake reduces oxidative stress and reverses age-related morphological changes of residual skin surface components in middle-aged volunteers. Res. N. Y. N 2017, 48, 40–48, doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2017.10.006.
  95. Yoon, H.-S.; Cho, H.H.; Cho, S.; Lee, S.-R.; Shin, M.-H.; Chung, J.H. Supplementating with dietary astaxanthin combined with collagen hydrolysate improves facial elasticity and decreases matrix metalloproteinase-1 and -12 expression: A comparative study with placebo. Med. Food 2014, 17, 810–816, doi:10.1089/jmf.2013.3060.
  96. Ng, Q.X.; De Deyn, M.L.Z.Q.; Loke, W.; Foo, N.X.; Chan, H.W.; Yeo, W.S. Effects of Astaxanthin supplementation on skin health: A systematic review of clinical studies. Diet. Suppl. 2020, 1–14, doi:10.1080/19390211.2020.1739187.
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : ,
View Times: 651
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 18 Feb 2021
Video Production Service