Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 876 word(s) 876 2021-01-20 07:37:16 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 876 2021-02-02 05:55:32 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Weber, M. Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 04 December 2023).
Weber M. Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed December 04, 2023.
Weber, Martin. "Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders" Encyclopedia, (accessed December 04, 2023).
Weber, M.(2021, January 28). Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. In Encyclopedia.
Weber, Martin. "Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders." Encyclopedia. Web. 28 January, 2021.
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are a heterogeneous group of monophasic or recurrent autoinflammatory diseases of the central nervous system (CNS).

neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders B cells

1. Introduction

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are a heterogeneous group of monophasic or recurrent autoinflammatory diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). Characteristically, symptoms like severe loss of vision, weakness or paralysis of extremities, loss of sensation, bowel and bladder dysfunction, area postrema clinical syndrome or respiratory failure are the result of rapidly sequential or bilateral optic neuritis, longitudinally extensive myelitis and inflammatory brain lesions affecting the circumventricular organs [1]. The first description of a patient suffering from amaurosis associated with autoptic-proven myelitis by Antoine Portal dates back to the year 1804, while the systematic description of ‘myelitis optica’ by Devic and Gault appeared by the end of the 19th century [2]. For many years, NMOSD were considered prognostically unfavorable variants of multiple sclerosis. When specific pathogenic aquaporin-4 (AQP4) autoantibodies were detected in a major subset of patients at the beginning of the 21st century, NMOSD were finally considered to belong to a disease entity distinct from multiple sclerosis [3].

According to the current diagnostic guidelines of 2015, the presence of at least one core manifestation is sufficient for NMOSD diagnosis in anti-AQP4 seropositive patients, which are now considered classical neuromyelitis optica patients, while two manifestations including optic neuritis, myelitis or area postrema syndrome are required for seronegative patients [4]. Within the population of AQP4 negative patients, a subset has been identified expressing antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) [5]. Based on clinical, radiological and immunologic features, this condition, now called ‘MOG-immunoglobulin G (IgG)-associated encephalomyelitis’, is considered a separate disease entity, distinct from AQP4-positive neuromyelitis optica as well as from multiple sclerosis [6][7].

2. The Role of B Cells and Antibodies in NMOSD

The integral transmembrane protein AQP4 was discovered in 1984 and is capable of conducting water through the cell membrane. It is the most abundant type of water channel in the CNS, located specifically at the astrocytic foot processes, which form the blood-brain barrier (BBB), but also at ependyma and glia limitans [8]. Outside the CNS, it can be found in lower concentrations on the epithelial cells of many organs like kidney and stomach, but AQP4 tetramers aggregate different than within the CNS [9]. According to the current disease concept of seropositive NMOSD, autoantibodies directly targeting AQP4 penetrate the BBB or derive from peripheral plasmablasts within the CNS: Pathogenic binding of AQP4-IgG to AQP4 causes complement-dependent cytotoxicity and subsequent chemotaxis of eosinophils, neutrophils, macrophages and lymphocytes. This leads to a direct destruction of astrocytes with a secondary, irreversible demise of oligodendrocytes, axons and neurons [10]. In contrast to multiple sclerosis, cortical demyelination is only seen after years of ongoing disease activity [11]. Serum AQP4 autoantibody titers were shown to correlate with the size of spinal cord lesions, clinical disease activity and therapeutic response, as they decrease after immunotherapy and remain low during remissions [12].

Since antibody-producing cells like plasmablasts and plasma cells are derived from B lymphocytes, the role of this very lymphocyte compartment is crucial for the pathophysiology of NMOSD [13]. This goes along with the finding that in affected patients, the number of antibody-producing plasmablasts is strongly elevated in the peripheral blood, peaking at relapses [14]. It is worth noting that, in contrast to multiple sclerosis, plasmablasts can barely be detected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of NMOSD patients [15][16]. Accordingly, NMOSD is now considered a humoral autoimmune disorder, where anti-AQP4 antibodies are mainly produced in the periphery [10][17]. In line, oligoclonal bands are rarely seen in NMOSD patients, often disappearing during disease development [8]. An inflammation-induced opening of the BBB is supposed to be a prerequisite for the entry of peripherally secreted autoantibodies into the CNS. This is supported by the observation that a subset of NMOSD patients shows signs of viral infections just prior to clinical relapses [18]. Astonishingly, the permeability of the BBB has also been reported to be increased by IgG antibodies themselves [19]. Upon binding to their target on the astrocytic endfeet, AQP4 antibodies trigger the complement cascade, leading to the formation of a membrane attack complex with subsequent astrocytic edema, dysfunction, destruction and secondary neuronal injury [20]. It must be noted that T cells are also thought to be required for the disruption of the BBB and the orchestration of the immune attack in the CNS [21].

Besides antibody-mediated effects, B lymphocytes also inherit two potent, cellular functions contributing to disease activity in NMOSD: Firstly, activated B cells are capable of secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines like interleukin-(IL-)6 and tumor necrosis factor, further fostering inflammatory processes, especially by generating T helper 17 cells [22][23]. Interestingly, IL-6 in turn also supports B cell activation and growth [23]. NMOSD patients indeed display elevated IL-6 in the CSF along with an elevated number of circulating T helper 17 and IL-17-producing cytotoxic T cells [21][24]. Secondly, B lymphocytes act as antigen-presenting cells by specifically binding antigens on their B cell receptor, before internalizing, processing and presenting them to T helper cells via major histocompatibility factor II molecules on their surface [25]. It was shown that the antigen-presenting function of B cells is required for the induction of experimental CNS autoimmunity independent of their humoral involvement [26].

In conclusion, B cells uniquely contribute to disease progression in NMOSD by the provision of autoantibodies, the secretion of cytokines and the presentation of antigen.


  1. Prasad, S.; Chen, J. What you need to know about aqp4, mog, and nmosd. Semin. Neurol. 2019, 39, 718–731.
  2. Jarius, S.; Wildemann, B. The history of neuromyelitis optica. J. Neuroinflamm. 2013, 10, 8.
  3. Lennon, V.A.; Wingerchuk, D.M.; Kryzer, T.J.; Pittock, S.J.; Lucchinetti, C.F.; Fujihara, K.; Nakashima, I.; Weinshenker, B.G. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: Distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2004, 364, 2106–2112.
  4. Wingerchuk, D.M.; Banwell, B.; Bennett, J.L.; Cabre, P.; Carroll, W.; Chitnis, T.; de Seze, J.; Fujihara, K.; Greenberg, B.; Jacob, A.; et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology 2015, 85, 177–189.
  5. Weber, M.S.; Derfuss, T.; Metz, I.; Bruck, W. Defining distinct features of anti-mog antibody associated central nervous system demyelination. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2018, 11, 1756286418762083.
  6. Lana-Peixoto, M.A.; Talim, N. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and anti-mog syndromes. Biomedicines 2019, 7, 42.
  7. Weber, M.S.; Derfuss, T.; Bruck, W. Anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated central nervous system demyelination-a novel disease entity? JAMA Neurol. 2018, 75, 909–910.
  8. Jarius, S.; Paul, F.; Franciotta, D.; Waters, P.; Zipp, F.; Hohlfeld, R.; Vincent, A.; Wildemann, B. Mechanisms of disease: Aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 2008, 4, 202–214.
  9. Papadopoulos, M.C.; Verkman, A.S. Aquaporin 4 and neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol. 2012, 11, 535–544.
  10. Kinzel, S.; Weber, M.S. The role of peripheral cns-directed antibodies in promoting inflammatory cns demyelination. Brain Sci. 2017, 7, 70.
  11. Levy, M.; Wildemann, B.; Jarius, S.; Orellano, B.; Sasidharan, S.; Weber, M.S.; Stuve, O. Immunopathogenesis of neuromyelitis optica. Adv. Immunol. 2014, 121, 213–242.
  12. Takahashi, T.; Fujihara, K.; Nakashima, I.; Misu, T.; Miyazawa, I.; Nakamura, M.; Watanabe, S.; Shiga, Y.; Kanaoka, C.; Fujimori, J.; et al. Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody is involved in the pathogenesis of nmo: A study on antibody titre. Brain 2007, 130, 1235–1243.
  13. Hausser-Kinzel, S.; Weber, M.S. The role of b cells and antibodies in multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica, and related disorders. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 201.
  14. Chihara, N.; Aranami, T.; Sato, W.; Miyazaki, Y.; Miyake, S.; Okamoto, T.; Ogawa, M.; Toda, T.; Yamamura, T. Interleukin 6 signaling promotes anti-aquaporin 4 autoantibody production from plasmablasts in neuromyelitis optica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3701–3706.
  15. Bennett, J.L.; Lam, C.; Kalluri, S.R.; Saikali, P.; Bautista, K.; Dupree, C.; Glogowska, M.; Case, D.; Antel, J.P.; Owens, G.P.; et al. Intrathecal pathogenic anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies in early neuromyelitis optica. Ann. Neurol. 2009, 66, 617–629.
  16. Lehmann-Horn, K.; Kinzel, S.; Weber, M.S. Deciphering the role of b cells in multiple sclerosis-towards specific targeting of pathogenic function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2048.
  17. Kinzel, S.; Lehmann-Horn, K.; Torke, S.; Hausler, D.; Winkler, A.; Stadelmann, C.; Payne, N.; Feldmann, L.; Saiz, A.; Reindl, M.; et al. Myelin-reactive antibodies initiate t cell-mediated cns autoimmune disease by opsonization of endogenous antigen. Acta Neuropathol. 2016, 132, 43–58.
  18. Ghezzi, A.; Bergamaschi, R.; Martinelli, V.; Trojano, M.; Tola, M.R.; Merelli, E.; Mancardi, L.; Gallo, P.; Filippi, M.; Zaffaroni, M.; et al. Clinical characteristics, course and prognosis of relapsing devic’s neuromyelitis optica. J. Neurol. 2004, 251, 47–52.
  19. Vincent, T.; Saikali, P.; Cayrol, R.; Roth, A.D.; Bar-Or, A.; Prat, A.; Antel, J.P. Functional consequences of neuromyelitis optica-igg astrocyte interactions on blood-brain barrier permeability and granulocyte recruitment. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 5730–5737.
  20. Soltys, J.; Liu, Y.; Ritchie, A.; Wemlinger, S.; Schaller, K.; Schumann, H.; Owens, G.P.; Bennett, J.L. Membrane assembly of aquaporin-4 autoantibodies regulates classical complement activation in neuromyelitis optica. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 2000–2013.
  21. Mitsdoerffer, M.; Kuchroo, V.; Korn, T. Immunology of neuromyelitis optica: A t cell-b cell collaboration. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2013, 1283, 57–66.
  22. Barr, T.A.; Shen, P.; Brown, S.; Lampropoulou, V.; Roch, T.; Lawrie, S.; Fan, B.; O’Connor, R.A.; Anderton, S.M.; Bar-Or, A.; et al. B cell depletion therapy ameliorates autoimmune disease through ablation of il-6-producing b cells. J. Exp. Med. 2012, 209, 1001–1010.
  23. Hunter, C.A.; Jones, S.A. Il-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 448–457.
  24. Pitarokoili, K.; Gold, R. Dimethyl fumarate for patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Mult. Scler. 2018, 24, 364–365.
  25. Weber, M.S.; Hemmer, B. Cooperation of b cells and t cells in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Results Probl. Cell Differ. 2010, 51, 115–126.
  26. Molnarfi, N.; Schulze-Topphoff, U.; Weber, M.S.; Patarroyo, J.C.; Prod’homme, T.; Varrin-Doyer, M.; Shetty, A.; Linington, C.; Slavin, A.J.; Hidalgo, J.; et al. Mhc class ii-dependent b cell apc function is required for induction of cns autoimmunity independent of myelin-specific antibodies. J. Exp. Med. 2013, 210, 2921–2937.
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to :
View Times: 301
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 02 Feb 2021