Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 Sean Maher -- 408 2026-04-03 14:24:25 |
2 formatted Joey Jiang Meta information modification 408 2026-04-08 09:50:25 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Maher, S.W. Deepfakes. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/59654 (accessed on 11 June 2026).
Maher SW. Deepfakes. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/59654. Accessed June 11, 2026.
Maher, Sean William. "Deepfakes" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/59654 (accessed June 11, 2026).
Maher, S.W. (2026, April 03). Deepfakes. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/59654
Maher, Sean William. "Deepfakes." Encyclopedia. Web. 03 April, 2026.
Peer Reviewed
Deepfakes

Deepfakes have emerged as one of the most significant developments in contemporary computational media, representing a sophisticated convergence of machine learning, computer vision, and audiovisual synthesis. Enabled primarily by deep neural networks such as generative adversarial networks (GANs) and transformer-based architectures, Deepfakes are realistic video fabrications through sound and image alteration and substitution that synthesises human likeness, speech, and behaviours. Deepfakes function simultaneously as creative tools, political instruments, security risks, and epistemic disruptors. They have generated widespread scholarly, regulatory, and public concern by contributing to the reshaping of visual communication and posing significant challenges to established norms of authenticity. This entry defines Deepfakes, outlines their technological foundations, synthesises insights from current research and assesses implications for media industries, journalism, documentary, disinformation, governance, and digital culture.

deepfakes synthetic media generative adversarial networks media manipulation misinformation disinformation media literacy digital ethics face swapping
Deepfakes refer to algorithmically generated or manipulated audiovisual artefacts produced through deep learning systems initially involving encoder–decoder models and more recently generative adversarial networks (GANs). Deepfakes are synthetic representations of people, voices, or events with high degrees of realism making them increasingly difficult to distinguish from authentic representations. Prominent U.S. politicians Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama and Joe Biden have been the subject of Deepfakes alongside countless numbers of female celebrities and anonymous women who have been subjected to Deepfakes for the purposes of revenge-porn. While traditional audiovisual manipulation has long existed, deepfakes represent a paradigmatic shift due to their automation, scalability, believability, and accessibility, allowing non-experts to create and distribute photorealistic fabrications with consumer-level tools.
Within media and communication studies, Deepfakes are understood as a form of synthetic media capable of eroding visual evidence standards, destabilising epistemic trust, and reshaping public communication practices [1][2][3][4][5]. Deepfakes is a compound noun derived from Deep and Fake: deep refers to deep learning methods, and fake, referring to inauthentic. Deepfakes refers to the products generated by machine learning computational models that enable face replacement, voice cloning, mouth reanimation, full-body puppetry, and multimodal synthetic content generation.
The following entry is arranged accordingly: Technological foundations presented in Section 2. Expanding into media, communication, and the epistemic challenges of deepfakes in Section 3. The social, political and cultural implications of Deepfakes are examined in Section 4. Issues stemming from Detection, Forensics, and Synthetic Media Literacy and explored in Section 5. Key measures of control are the focus of Section 6 with governance, regulation, and ethical frameworks. Section 7 addresses contemporary developments and future trajectories and conclusions are in Section 8.

References

  1. Tolosana, R.; Vera-Rodríguez, R.; Fierrez, J.; Morales, A.; Ortega-García, J. DeepFakes and Beyond: A Survey of Face Manipulation and Fake Detection. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2001.00179.
  2. Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, Q.V.H.; Nguyen, D.T.; Nguyen, T.A.; Nahavandi, S.; Bhatti, A.; Nguyen, T.N. Deep Learning for Deepfakes Creation and Detection: A Survey. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1909.11573.
  3. Fallis, D. The Epistemic Threat of Deepfakes. Philos. Technol. 2020, 34, 565–578.
  4. de Ruiter, A. The Distinct Wrong of Deepfakes. Philos. Technol. 2021, 34, 887–903.
  5. Flattery, T.; Miler, C. Deepfakes and Dishonesty. Philos. Technol. 2024, 37, 120.
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Others
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : Sean William Maher
View Times: 14
Online Date: 03 Apr 2026
Notice
You are not a member of the advisory board for this topic. If you want to update advisory board member profile, please contact office@encyclopedia.pub.
OK
Confirm
Only members of the Encyclopedia advisory board for this topic are allowed to note entries. Would you like to become an advisory board member of the Encyclopedia?
Yes
No
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
There is no comment~
${ textCharacter }/${ maxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
${ selectedItem.replyTextCharacter }/${ selectedItem.replyMaxCharacter }
Submit
Cancel
Confirm
Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Academic Video Service

Quick Survey

Encyclopedia MDPI is conducting a targeted survey to identify the specific barriers hindering efficient research. We invite you to spend 3 minutes defining the priorities for our next generation of structured knowledge tools.
Take Survey