1. Introduction
Despite the presence of iron-oxidizing members within the
Acidithiobacillus genus
[1], the oxidation of elemental sulfur, as well as diverse reduced sulfur compounds, serves as the main electron source for this bacterial group, enabling
Acidithiobacillus to drive energy generation through respiratory processes
[2]. Proteomic analysis has reported a separation of the iron and sulfur utilization pathways in both iron- and sulfur-oxidizer members, although the two energy-generating pathways can be simultaneously induced depending on the type and the concentration of the available oxidizable substrates
[3].
Figure 1. Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans DSMZ 14887 observed under optical microscopy after crystal violet staining (40× magnification).
The ability of
Acidithiobacillus species to oxidize sulfur was first detected in
A. thiooxidans in 1959
[4]. Since then, the identification of sulfur-oxidizing enzymes has remained a central focus of the field. The sulfur cycle is a vital biogeochemical process that affects ecosystem functioning, atmospheric chemistry, and nutrient availability. Sulfur can exist in different oxidation states ranging from −2 to +6, leading to the formation of a variety of reduced/oxidized inorganic sulfur compounds, including thiosulfate (S
2O
32−), sulfite (SO
32−), sulfate (SO
42−), tetrathionate (S
4O
62−), and elemental sulfur (S
0), among others
[5]. This transformation of sulfur compounds is a key step in the cycle, and it is mediated by a diverse array of microorganisms. Among these,
Acidithiobacillus stands out due to its acidophilic nature, contributing to the sulfur cycle in acidic environments
[5].
The adherence of bacterial cells to sulfur is a crucial step in the sulfur oxidation process in
Acidithiobacillus species. When utilizing sulfur as a substrate,
A. ferrooxidans exhibits an increased synthesis of fatty acids and lipid compounds in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), which enhance bacterial adhesion to sulfur particles through hydrophobic interactions
[1][6]. Similarly, in
A. thiooxidans, phospholipids production has been reported as responsible for wetting elemental sulfur, an essential requirement for bacterial growth
[7]. Thus, following cell adhesion to sulfur particles (including the orthombic α-S
8, the main elemental sulfur form in nature), elemental sulfur is activated upon contact with a thiol group (RSH), such as that found in the outer-membrane proteins of the
Acidithiobacillus genus. This activation process may induce the opening of the α-S8 ring, leading to the formation of linear polysulfide, enabling its entry into the bacterial cell and initiating its metabolism
[6][8].
Once inside, the electrons derived from the reduction of sulfur are initially transferred to oxidized glutathione (GSSH) and then proceed through a series of sulfur transporters before ultimately entering the quinone pool. From there, the electrons can follow two possible routes: (i) they may directly and sequentially pass to the terminal enzyme complex to generate reducing power, or (ii) they can be transmitted to the NADH complex for the same purpose.
Nevertheless, since unraveling these peculiar pathways could provide valuable insights into the metabolic versatility of these bacteria and how they adapt to different environments
[9], a comprehensive understanding of this intricate metabolic pathway needs a deep analysis of the proteins and processes involved (
Figure 2). Following sections describe the principal enzymatic activities currently known in
Acidithiobacillus for elemental sulfur metabolism, including those present in the periplasm (e.g., sulfur dioxygenase) and in the cytoplasm (such as sulfur oxygenase reductase).
Figure 2. Model of sulfur oxidation metabolism in Acidithiobacillus species, involving both the periplasm and the cytoplasm, within a complex metabolic pathway that encompasses numerous enzymes and transporters. SDO, sulfur dioxygenase; TQO, thiosulfate quinone oxidoreductase; SQR, sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase; QH2, quinol pool; NDC, NADH dehydrogenase complex; HDR, HDR-like complex; SOR, sulfur oxygenase reductase; OM, outer membrane; CM: cytoplasmic membrane. Created by BioRender.com.
2. Sulfur Dioxygenase (SDO)
Sulfur oxidation in the
Acidithiobacillus genus is initiated by the enzyme sulfur dioxygenase (SDO; EC 1.13.11.18)
[10][11], which is one of the earliest reported enzymes involved in the process. It was first isolated in 1987 from
A. ferrooxidans, and it is composed by 21 and 26 kDa subunits in
A. thiooxidans or two 23 kDa subunits in
A. ferrooxidans [12][13][14]. This periplasmic enzyme (
Figure 2) functions as a sulfur:ferric ion oxidoreductase and is able to catalyze the oxidation of S
0 to sulfite
[1][2]. However, the genes responsible for the biosynthesis of this enzyme (
sdo genes) were identified almost thirty years later by Wang and co-workers
[15]. Subsequent studies have led to the proposal of two homologs in mitochondria and heterotrophic bacteria: ETHE1 and PDO (persulfide dioxygenase), respectively, both of which have been extensively investigated
[16][17][18][19][20]. The ETHE1/PDO complex cooperates with the sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase (SQR) to oxidize H
2S, thereby diminishing the toxic impact of H
2S on cellular processes
[17][20]. However, the specific role of SDO in
Acidithiobacillus species remains unknown. It has been postulated that sulfur may be adsorbed onto the cell surface by extracellular polymeric substances
[1] and, as a result, it is transported to the periplasmic space following activation by a thiol-containing outer-membrane protein (OMP) to form persulfide sulfane sulfur (
Figure 2). Subsequently, SDO might function as the primary enzyme for sulfur oxidation, leading to the production of sulfite
[21]. Although not yet conclusively demonstrated, there are indications that the OMP responsible for intracellular sulfur uptake is likely the Omp40 (AFE2741) protein. Omp40 is a 40 kDa protein that forms an oligomeric structure of 120 kDa, associated with the adhesion to solid sulfur substrates and regarded as an adaptation to hinder the unrestricted movement of protons across the outer membrane in
A. ferrooxidans [22]. Its expression is enhanced during the growth of
A. ferrooxidans on sulfur, but not in the exclusive presence of iron, leading to the proposal that Omp40 might function as a potential sulfur transporter
[23].
Additionally, recent research has revealed the presence of two or even three copies of SDO paralogs in certain strains of
Acidithiobacillus [24], contributing to the intricacy of comprehending sulfur metabolism in these organisms. Such is the case for
A. caldus MTH-04, where two homologs have been identified, named SDO1 (A5904_0421) and SDO2 (A5904_07909)
[2]. Consequently, a detailed analysis of the SDO genes in
Acidithiobacillus has shown that the homologous found from different species can be classified into four principal subgroups: ETHE1, Blh, SdoS, and SdoA. Other examples are
A. thiooxidans A01 (SdoS; WP_024895058.1 and SdoA; WP_024893175.1),
A. thiooxidans ZBY (SdoS; WP-024895058.1 and SdoA; WP_024893175.1), and
A. ferridurans JCM_18981 (SdoS; BBF65856.1 and ETHE1; BBF64918.1)
[24]. Indeed, the existence of various SDO subgroups suggests their potential involvement in distinct pathways for elemental sulfur oxidation. The ETHE1 subgroup appears to be associated with the H
2S pathway, whereas the SdoS subgroup is likely connected to the S
4O
62− decomposition pathway
[2]. This diversity in SDO subgroups implies a sophisticated regulation and coordination of sulfur metabolism in
Acidithiobacillus species.
3. Sulfur Oxygenase Reductase (SOR)
Sulfur oxygenase reductase (SOR) is another well-known elemental sulfur-oxidizing enzyme. It catalyzes the oxygen-dependent disproportionation of elemental sulfur, a process in which sulfur molecules undergo a chemical transformation. This results in the production of several compounds, namely sulfite (SO
3), thiosulfate (S
2O
3), and sulfide (H
2S) (
Figure 2). This enzymatic reaction plays a crucial role in the sulfur metabolism of
Acidithiobacillus and contributes to the conversion of elemental sulfur into various sulfur compounds, which have significant ecological and biochemical implications
[24].
First considered an “archaeal like” enzyme, it is also encoded in the genome of some acidophilic leaching bacteria such as some
Acidithiobacillus species
[25]. Once again, the intricacies surrounding the mechanistic action of SOR surpass current understanding. While the activity of SOR in
A. caldus SM-1 was initially reported by Chen and co-workers in 2007
[26], subsequent investigations revealed the absence of the corresponding gene in the strain’s genome
[27]. Finally, the observed enzymatic activity was attributed to sample contamination by
Sulfobacillus [25]. However, despite this aforementioned discovery, genes encoding SOR have been finally identified in some, but not all, strains of
A. thiooxidans, A. ferrooxidans, A. ferrivorans, A. caldus, and
A. albertensis [10][28][29][30][31]. Phylogenetic analysis strongly suggests that the identified SORs in these
Acidithiobacillus strains were likely acquired through horizontal gene transfer from sulfur-oxidizing archaea
[24]. In fact, several analyses indicate that SOR activity is secondary, rather than essential, for cytoplasmic elemental sulfur oxidation in these sulfur-oxidizing bacteria
[24][25][27][30].
4. Heterodisulfide Reductase (HDR)-like System
The next step in the sulfur metabolism is postulated to occur in the cytoplasm by a heterodisulfide reductase (HDR)-like system, which serves as an elemental sulfur oxidation enzyme in
Acidithiobacillus and other sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and archaea
[10][30][32][33][34], since transcriptomic analyses in
A. thiooxidans have reported an increase in its expression levels in the presence of elemental sulfur compared to other sulfur sources such as thiosulfate
[35].
This complex is proposed to be involved in the oxidation of disulfide intermediates, particularly sulfane sulfur species like GSSH (oxidized glutathione) or other sulfur carriers, finally converting them into sulfite. Nevertheless, concrete biochemical evidence in
Acidithiobacillus supporting the function of HDR-like systems remains diffuse. Recently, indirect analyses have provided evidence of the role of the HDR-like complex in the oxidation of thiosulfate to sulfite in the α-proteobacteria
Hyphomicrobium denitrificans [36], with the lipoate-binding protein LbpA being essential in this process
[37]. Additionally,
hdr-like genes are consistently found in conjunction with genes encoding the TusA protein and other rhodanase homologs
[33]. TusA and DsrE are sulfur carrier proteins that exist in several sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and archaea
[32][33].
rhd-
tusA-
dsrE genes have been reported either individually or as part of larger gene clusters in
Acidithiobacillus species, including
A. caldus and
A. ferrooxidans, among others
[24][32]. Thus, a sulfur oxidation pathway has been proposed, involving the HDR-like complex responsible for the oxidation of sulfane sulfur to sulfite developed by the carrier TusA. The electron transfer in this reaction may be facilitated by LbpA, leading to the generation of NADH
[37]. The confirmation of the sulfur-oxidizing ability of the HDR-like complex and its involvement in the sulfur-metabolizing process demonstrated in
H. denitrificans [36],
Metallosphaera cuprina, and
Allochromatium vinosum [32][33] holds the potential to provide valuable insights into the elemental sulfur oxidation mechanisms operating within the cytoplasm of
Acidithiobacillus species. Consequently, further research on this complex is warranted.
In these aforementioned species, it has been also reported that inorganic sulfur compounds are successively transferred by the rhodanase (Rhd), as well as the carriers DsrE and TusA, producing sulfane sulfur at the Cys18 of TusA
[32][33]. Rhd, which belongs to the sulfur transferase family found in organisms from all three domains of life, is known to participate in various cellular processes
[24]. This enzyme cleaves the S–S bond in thiosulfate, producing sulfur and sulfite. Interestingly, Rhd has been purified from crude extracts of
A. ferrooxidans, A. caldus, and
A. thiooxidans [38][39], and its gene sequences have been identified in the complete genomes of
Acidithiobacillus species
[31][40]. However, its precise involvement in sulfur metabolism within
Acidithiobacillus remains to be fully elucidated, since transcriptomic analyses have indicated low expression of the
rhd gene in
A. thiooxidans during both thiosulfate and sulfur growth conditions
[35].
On the other hand, TusA plays a central role in sulfur movements within the cytoplasm of sulfur-oxidizing prokaryotes
[33] and might deliver sulfane sulfur to the HDR-like system
[37], thus acting as a crucial link between sulfur transferal and the HDR-like complex. Given the presence of these genes in certain
Acidithiobacillus strains, it is plausible that similar pathways might operate in the cytoplasm of these sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. Consequently, conducting proteomic characterization and in vivo functional studies of these genes would be of great interest to confirm the functionality of the proposed process and shed light on the sulfur metabolism in
Acidithiobacillus.
The coexistence of SDO, SOR, and the HDR-like complex in the
Acidithiobacillus genus highlights the diversity and intricacy of elemental sulfur oxidation within these acidophilic bacteria. Notably, a triple
sor-
sdo1-
sdo2 mutant of
A. caldus MTH-04 displayed heightened elemental sulfur oxidation activity, suggesting the presence of as-yet-undetermined elemental sulfur oxidation enzymes in
Acidithiobacillus species
[2].