Over the last 50 years, there have been many attempts to devise and validate questionnaires to assess an individual’s attitude toward money and related issues. This paper attempts to conduct a comprehensive review of those measures. In all, this paper documents 54 salient studies and consults many other references from diverse and multi-disciplinary literature. There is evidently a great deal of overlap in the money attitudes dimensions assessed. Research has concentrated on the correlates of these attitudes (cultural, demographic, financial, and personality). Suggestions for the choice and development of measures are made, along with propositions for future research.
People undoubtedly differ in their money attitudes, beliefs, and habits, which can have serious consequences for their well-being
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Over the last 50 years, psychologists have attempted to construct and validate measures of attitudes to, and beliefs about, money
[11]. Various research groups are involved in this literature, including economists; clinical, economic, and social psychologists; financial advisors; and sociologists
[12][13]. All are interested in how people think about, and use, their money in many different ways
[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Topics of interest have ranged from the relationship of money beliefs to Bitcoin
[23], personality and money
[24], as well as money as a symbol in the relationship between financial advisors and their clients
[25]. Some researchers are interested in parental financial education
[26] and others in spending and saving
[4][27]. There is now a great deal of interest in financial literacy and how that is influenced by money attitudes
[28][29][30][31]. It has been recognized that money attitudes and financial literacy are clearly related to financial well-being, which is the concern of many
[32]. Studies have been conducted around the world and the interest in the area is truly universal
[33].
This disciplinary divergence in this area makes it particularly difficult to review and keep up to date with the literature. Moreover, it highlights certain disciplinary disparities in values and expertise. Thus, psychologists seem more interested in, and competent at, questionnaire designs and evaluation; financial advisors are more intrigued by changing money beliefs, and sociologists are fascinated by the distribution of these beliefs in society. There are also detectable and different ABC (Affectively, Behavioural, and Cognitively) models and some tension between quantitative and qualitative researchers.
The literature has grown exponentially over this half-century, and there now exist several noteworthy reviews
[34][35][36]. Some researchers, like Thomas Tang, have worked in the area for over 30 years, publishing well over one hundred papers and are concerned with ethical and business correlates of monetary beliefs
[37][38]. There are also many specific interest areas like gender differences in the use of money, student understanding and use of money, cultural differences in money attitudes, and how best to help people with financial problems
[39].
This paper documents over 50 research studies from various countries and disciplines that explore money attitudes, an issue of both practical and theoretical interest. This review will inevitably miss critical papers because of the complexity of the topic, but it serves to partly update the reviews by Furnham
[40] and Sesini and Lozza
[34][35]. The essential aim of this review is to assist researchers in their choice of instruments to assess money beliefs. Furthermore, it indicates what individual difference factors have been investigated with respect to the various measures, to what extent results (e.g., sex differences) have been replicated, and, therefore, what remains to be explored. It should be stressed that this paper is not an attempt to provide a comprehensive review of the many and growing studies on attitudes to money; rather, the aim is to examine the different questionnaires that have been designed to assess those attitudes.
There are many questionnaires, probably now over 20, which attempt to assess money-related attitudes and behaviours
[6][9][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. These are being developed all the time, often for very specific purposes
[51]. Many have been critically appraised
[52][53][54].
When researchers select an instrument to measure money attitudes and beliefs, they nearly always have similar specific criteria: they want it to be comprehensive to the extent that it measures all known and salient dimensions; they want it to be as short as possible (to encourage participant retention); and, most of all, they want it to be reliable (internally, and test–retest) as well as valid (concurrent, construct, convergent, discriminant, face, incremental, and predictive). Ideally, they would also like it to be cross-culturally valid, prone to little impression management, and appropriate for a wide variety of people in terms of demography. These criteria are a “tall order” for non-experts attempting to construct a useful measure of a construct they understand. This paper is not a psychometric review, though there is clearly a need for one to help researchers make choices about which measure to use.
This paper will first document the relevant papers in a table and compare the approaches and findings. Then the issue of dimensions will be discussed, which is often concerned with the theory or model underlying monetary attitudes and beliefs. The final section of the paper will discuss some important research questions in this area and what important future research needs to be conducted.