White Coat in the Domestic Horse

Version	Summary	Created by	Modification	Content Size	Created at	Operation
1		Aiden McFadden	--	2374	2024-03-01 16:14:15	\|
2	references update and layout	Fanny Huang	Meta information modification	2374	2024-03-05 08:40:10	\| \|
3	layout	Fanny Huang	Meta information modification	2374	2024-03-05 08:41:45	\|

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ani14030451

Traits such as shape, size, and color often influence the economic and sentimental value of a horse. Around the world, horses are bred and prized for the colors and markings that make their unique coat patterns stand out from the crowd. The underlying genetic mechanisms determining the color of a horse’s coat can vary greatly in their complexity.

horse mutation coat color depigmentation white horse

1. Introduction

A streak of white, a patch of pink skin, a piercing blue eye. These traits add individuality, stunning beauty, and economic value to the domestic horse (Equus caballus). Specific color traits can help a horse qualify for color-specific registries. However, some of these prized alleles can cause detrimental phenotypes, such as an increased risk of deafness or blindness. Other combinations of these sought-after color traits fail to produce viable offspring. Understanding the etiology of white markings is crucial to ensure ethical care and breeding practices.

Recent advancements have decreased the cost of genome sequencing, enabling the elucidation of the characteristics of the genetic mutations causing many depigmentation phenotypes. KIT, MITF, PAX3, HPS5, EDNRB, TRPM1, and RFWD3 represent the collection of genes associated with different white markings in the domestic horse (Table 1). While the genetic mechanisms underlying some of these color traits are not fully understood, the information collected on white spotting mutations can assist breeders in making optimal choices to breed unique and healthy herds.

Table 1. White coat color traits and their distinguishing characteristics along with the associated genes and encoded proteins.

Trait	Allele Symbol	Gene/Region	Encoded Protein (Complex)	Distinguishing Characteristics (Phenotype)
Dominant White	W	KIT	KIT	White spots or white coat, pink skin (sabino-like, all white)
Tobiano	TO	KIT	KIT	Large white spots covering the body and crossing the spine, white legs, pink skin (tobiano)
Sabino	SB1	KIT	KIT	Jagged white markings or white coat, pink skin (sabino, all white)
Roan	RN	KIT	KIT	Interspersed white hairs distributed through the coat (roan)
Splashed White	SW	MITF, PAX3	MITF, PAX3	Deafness, blue eyes, smooth boarded white faces, abdomens, and legs (splashed white)
Eden White	EDXW	HPS5	HPS5 (BLOC-2)	White body spots, legs, and faces (sabino-like)
Lethal White Overo	LWO, O	EDNRB	EDNRB	White face, legs, and body spots that do not cross the spine (overo)
Leopard Spotting	LP	TRPM1	TRPM1	White hind quarter or white coat with colored spots, epistatic to PATN1 (blanket or leopard)
Pattern 1	PATN1	RFWD3	RFWD3	Increases white spotting for individuals with a least one copy of LP

2. Dominant White

A “white” horse has held a special place throughout history and mythology, appearing in many great legends and tales. However, the horses captured in the literature and art do not always depict a truly white horse, whose phenotypes are often confused with Grey or Cream. Because horses homozygous for Cream have pink skin and hair diluted to a near-white color, it is difficult to differentiate between true white and homozygous Cream horses ^[1]. Dominant White horses are born with white markings and display pink skin below these areas, while individuals with Grey do not have pink skin and are not born with white hairs, but develop them with age ^[1]. The Romans knew of the phenotypic differences between gray and white, although it remains unknown if their terms for these colors correspond to modern designations ^[2]. Investigations into runs of homozygosity in 1476 horses of European descent revealed positive selection for base coat color on ECA3, but not in the region harboring KIT ^[3], while selection for white coat color patterns has been identified in ancient horse DNA ^[4].

The Dominant White locus is the equine locus with the largest number of known variants causing depigmentation (Table 2), and it is located on chromosome 3 within the Proto-Oncogene, Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (KIT) gene ^[2]. Dominant White uses the capital “W” followed by the integer in the series to indicate the specific dominant variant present in the genotype (e.g., W35). Originally, the W symbol was used for a small number of variants all following a true dominant pattern of inheritance and producing all white horses in the heterozygous state. The earlier dominant mutations were not observed in the homozygous state, leading to the adoption of an alternate term, Lethal Dominant White. Time has not honored this tradition as, to date, six W variants are known to be inherited in an incomplete dominant manner, with genotypes existing in the homozygous state in apparently healthy horses. Recent publications have started to refer to Dominant White as White Spotting to better account for the varied phenotypes at the W locus ^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8]. Phenotypes at the Dominant White locus are broadly characterized by horses displaying white areas with clear borders, or a completely white horse with pink skin underneath. Thirty-five W variants have been reported, and it seems likely that the number will continue to increase ^[2]^[9]^[10]^[11]^[12]^[13]^[14]^[15]^[16]^[17]^[18]^[19]^[20].

Table 2. Genomic location, variant type, and phenotypes of Dominant White KIT variants.

Allele	Genomic Coordinate EquCab3.0	Type	Phenotype	Homozygotes	References
W1	chr3:79545942G>C	nonsense	All White	Not Observed	^[2]
W2	chr3:79549540C>T	missense	All White	Not Observed	^[2]
W3	chr3:79578535T>A	nonsense	All White	Not Observed	^[2]
W4	chr3:79549780G>A	missense	All White	Not Observed	^[2]
W5	chr3:79545900delC	small deletion	Sabino-like	Not Observed	^[12]
W6	chr3:79573754C>T	missense	Sabino-like to All White	Not Observed	^[12]
W7	chr3:79580000C>G	splice site	All White	Not Observed	^[12]
W8	chr3:79545374C>T	splice site	Sabino-like	Not Observed	^[12]
W9	chr3:79549797C>T	missense	All White	Not Observed	^[12]
W10	chr3:79566925_79566928del	small deletion	Sabino-like to All White	Not Observed	^[12]
W11	chr3:79540429C>A	splice site	All White	Not Observed	^[12]
W12	chr3:79579755_79579779delAGACG	small deletion	Sabino-like	Not Observed	^[17]
W13	chr3:79544066C>G	splice site	All White	Not Observed	^[14]
W14	chr3:79544151_79544204del	gross deletion	All White	Not Observed	^[14]
W15	chr3:79550351A>G	missense	Sabino-like to All White	Observed	^[14]^[18]
W16	chr3:79540741T>A	missense	All White	Not Observed	^[14]
W17a	chr3:79548265T>A	missense	All White	Not Observed	^[14]
W17b	chr3:79548244A>G	missense	All White	Not Observed	^[14]
W18	chr3:79553751C>T	splice site	Sabino-like	Not Observed	^[15]
W19	chr3:79553776T>C	missense	Sabino-like	Observed	^[15]
W20	chr3:7948220T>C	missense	No markings to Sabino-like	Observed	^[15]
W21	chr3:79544174delG	small deletion	Sabino-like	Not Observed	^[13]
W22	chr3:79548925_79550822del1898	gross deletion	Sabino-like	Not Observed	^[11]
W23	chr3:79578484C>G	splice site	All White	Not Observed	^[18]
W24	chr3:79545245C>T	splice site	All White	Not Observed	^[10]
W25	chr3:77769878T>C	missense	All White	Not Observed	^[16]
W26	chr3:79544150del	small deletion	Sabino-like	Not Observed	^[16]
W27	chr3:79552028A>C	missense	All White	Not Observed	^[16]
W28	chr3:79579925_79581197del	gross deletion	Sabino-like	Not Observed	^[19]
W30	chr3:79548244T>A	missense	All White	Not Observed	^[20]
W31	chr3:79618532_79618533insT	fs nonsense	Sabino-like	Not Observed	^[7]
W32	chr3:79538738C>T	missense	No markings to Sabino-like	Observed	^[7]
W33	chr3:79545248T>A	missense	Sabino-like	Not Observed	^[5]
W34	chr3:79566881T>C	missense	No markings to Sabino-like	Observed	^[8]
W35	chr3:79618649A>C	UTR variant	No markings to Sabino-like	Observed	^[6]

Many W alleles have been traced to a founding individual and are limited to those descendants, yet others are observed in diverse breeds, including a few that have likely circulated among diverse breeds over centuries, transmitted in cross-breed matings and by shipment of horses around the globe. The introduction of white alleles to new breeds is also promoted by registries opening studbooks to foreign horses with hopes of reducing inbreeding. As an example, researchers identified W13 in American Quarter Horses (AQH) in 2011 ^[14], but more recently observed this allele in both Shetland ponies and American Miniatures ^[21], two breeds genetically distant from the AQH. As Shetland ponies are not typically tested for W13, identification of this allele only occurred after genotypes for more common white variants (ex: TO, SB1, W20) failed to explain the depigmentation. Identifying variants outside of their presumed breed of origin is important to ensure the accurate monitoring and reporting of alleles with harmful side effects. Increased awareness of the presence of these alleles in new and existing populations will help prevent the introduction of white alleles into registries that select against white markings and mitigate the potential crossing of lethal pairs.

2.1. Phenotype

Phenotypes associated with the W locus are characterized by either white patterning or an entirely white coat with pink skin underneath. Mild white spotting phenotypes are described as sabino-like, with white legs, facial stripes, and a collection of other white facial markings (called stars or snips depending on the size, shape, and location), and, less commonly, patches of white hair across the abdomen ^[22]. Strongly deleterious mutations (frameshift, stop-gain, indel) typically result in completely white horses with pink skin (Figure 1). In contrast, W20, W32, W34, and W35 horses can be solid (non-white) in color in the absence of other white alleles but may magnify white markings caused by other alleles. For example, when an individual carries one copy of W22 and an out-of-phase copy of W20, the resulting phenotype is an all-white or almost all-white horse, despite each of these individual alleles typically producing less pronounced depigmentation phenotypes ^[11]^[23]. The amplification of the degree of white spotting is also observed with W5/n and W20/n compound heterozygotes, as these horses display an all-white phenotype ^[24]. Variants W19, W21–W23, W28, and W31–W35 produce a sabino-like phenotype sometimes accompanied by depigmentation on the abdomen with jagged borders. KIT variants also sometimes cause a rare phenotype of blue eyes when the depigmentation covers the entire face, including the eyes.

Figure 1. Various phenotypes caused by variants at the W locus, including full depigmentation, a sabino-like pattern, and minimal markings. Coat color genotypes and breeds are as follows: (A) a/a E/e (black) W13/n, Friesian-American White Horse cross. (B) A/a E/e Cr/n (Buckskin). (C) Foal—A/A E/E (bay) W15/15, Arabian, Dam—A/A E/e (bay) W15/n, Arabian.

Deleterious Dominant White alleles result in more extensive white markings and are likely lethal in the homozygous state ^[25]. W1–W14, W16–W18, W21–28, W30, W31, and W33 have not been observed in the homozygous state, and are predicted to be homozygous lethal due to their similarities to mutations observed in other species ^[2]^[25]. Progeny ratios for white alleles causing fully white phenotypes also stray from Mendelian expectations. When heterozygous white horses were crossed, the resulting offspring possessed a 2:1 ratio of white foals to solid foals, supporting the hypothesis that W/W is lethal during early gestation ^[25]. These two observations suggest homozygous embryos are not viable for certain alleles, but too few births have occurred to conclusively determine the lethality of each variant. W15, originally thought to be embryonic lethal, was later reported in two homozygous individuals ^[18]. A horse homozygous for W19 was also recently identified, which also boasted two copies of W34 and W35 each, for a total of six white spotting variants ^[26]. Cases such as this support the hypothesis that other white variants could be viable in the homozygous state but have not yet been observed. Conclusions regarding the lethality of homozygous Dominant White variants will only be elucidated through continued monitoring and expanded genetic testing for these variants.

Many KIT variant haplotypes are reported in horses, and the resulting phenotypes are extremely varied and not fully documented. Phenotypes of horses with multiple white alleles depend on the specific white allele combination but generally result in increased depigmentation when compared to individuals with only one variant. Despite the impressive number of publications on the Dominant White locus, there are few studies focusing on phenotypes of horses with multiple white alleles. There are even fewer studies focusing on the health effects, and specifically, the reproductive effects, of horses with KIT variants, despite reports of KIT variants being associated with health defects in other species ^[2].

2.2. Mechanisms and Genetics

KIT transmits transmembrane signals critical for survival and plays an important role in melanogenesis ^[27]^[28]^[29]. During development, melanoblasts begin to migrate from the neural crest to populate the rest of the body and eventually develop into melanocytes (pigment-producing cells). Melanocyte development is in part controlled by interactions between KIT, KIT Ligand (KITL), and Melanocyte Inducing Transcription Factor (MITF) ^[28]^[29]^[30]^[31]^[32]^[33]^[34]^[35]. After binding with KITL in the extracellular domain, KIT self-dimerizes and phosphorylates MITF, activating the transcription factor and upregulating target genes involved in pigmentation ^[28]^[29]. Mutations affecting the function or binding sites of KIT protein disrupt this pathway, resulting in downregulated pigment genes and melanocytes failing to develop in some or all of the tissues.

There are a variety of mutations at the Dominant White locus including deletions, insertions, missense, nonsense, and splice site variants. More impactful mutations alter the protein conformation and function to a greater degree, and cause greater disruptions to KIT pathways, resulting in fewer melanoblasts properly migrating and a more depigmented individual. More tolerated KIT variants such as W20, W32, and W35 have subtle effects on the protein or protein expression and result in milder phenotypes. However, because the failure of a melanoblast to migrate is a chance event, mild variants on their own may still cause extensive depigmentation. The stochastic nature of white spotting events can cause individuals with the same genotype to display very different phenotypes. Commercial genetic testing for all W alleles exists, but assays for W10, W13, W19, W20, and W22 are among the more readily available tests since these alleles are more common.

Up to three KIT variants have recently been found linked together, resulting in complex haplotypes. To date, the W22 allele has only been observed in combination with the W20 allele ^[11]^[23]. W19 has been observed by itself and in linkage with W34 and W35. The W19W34W35 haplotype likely occurred by a crossover event because it was only identified in an inbred family, while the W19 allele has been found out of phase of W34 and W35 in multiple families ^[26]. Sixteen haplotypes, including combinations of W20, W32, W34, and/or W35 with other variants, have been identified, but the genesis of these complex haplotypes is not completely understood. Founder horses have not been reanalyzed for recently discovered alleles to reveal if novel variants occurred on the background of other alleles or if the haplotype occurred via a crossover event. While phenotypic records of all known multilocus genotypes are incomplete, it is likely that more white variants increase the amount of white patterning on a horse.

References

Bailey, E.; Brooks, S.A. Horse Genetics, 3rd ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2020.
Haase, B.; Brooks, S.A.; Schlumbaum, A.; Azor, P.J.; Bailey, E.; Alaeddine, F.; Mevissen, M.; Burger, D.; Poncet, P.-A.; Rieder, S.; et al. Allelic Heterogeneity at the Equine KIT Locus in Dominant White (W) Horses. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3, e195.
Grilz-Seger, G.; Neuditschko, M.; Ricard, A.; Velie, B.; Lindgren, G.; Mesarič, M.; Cotman, M.; Horna, M.; Dobretsberger, M.; Brem, G.; et al. Genome-Wide Homozygosity Patterns and Evidence for Selection in a Set of European and Near Eastern Horse Breeds. Genes 2019, 10, 491.
He, Z.; Dai, X.; Lyu, W.; Beaumont, M.; Yu, F. Estimating Temporally Variable Selection Intensity from Ancient DNA Data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2023, 40, msad008.
Esdaile, E.; Till, B.; Kallenberg, A.; Fremeux, M.; Bickel, L.; Bellone, R.R. A de novo missense mutation in KIT is responsible for dominant white spotting phenotype in a Standardbred horse. Anim. Genet. 2022, 53, 534–537.
McFadden, A.; Martin, K.; Foster, G.; Vierra, M.; Lundquist, E.W.; Everts, R.E.; Martin, E.; Volz, E.; McLoone, K.; Brooks, S.A.; et al. 5′UTR Variant in KIT Associated With White Spotting in Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2023, 127, 104563.
Patterson Rosa, L.; Martin, K.; Vierra, M.; Foster, G.; Lundquist, E.; Brooks, S.A.; Lafayette, C. Two Variants of KIT Causing White Patterning in Stock-Type Horses. J. Hered. 2021, 112, 447–451.
Patterson Rosa, L.; Martin, K.; Vierra, M.; Lundquist, E.; Foster, G.; Brooks, S.A.; Lafayette, C. A KIT Variant Associated with Increased White Spotting Epistatic to MC1R Genotype in Horses (Equus caballus). Animals 2022, 12, 1958.
Brooks, S.A.; Bailey, E. Exon skipping in the KIT gene causes a Sabino spotting pattern in horses. Mamm. Genome 2005, 16, 893–902.
Capomaccio, S.; Milanesi, M.; Nocelli, C.; Giontella, A.; Verini-Supplizi, A.; Branca, M.; Silvestrelli, M.; Cappelli, K. Splicing site disruption in the KIT gene as strong candidate for white dominant phenotype in an Italian Trotter. Anim. Genet. 2017, 48, 727–728.
Dürig, N.; Jude, R.; Holl, H.; Brooks, S.A.; Lafayette, C.; Jagannathan, V.; Leeb, T. Whole genome sequencing reveals a novel deletion variant in the KIT gene in horses with white spotted coat colour phenotypes. Anim. Genet. 2017, 48, 483–485.
Haase, B.; Brooks, S.A.; Tozaki, T.; Burger, D.; Poncet, P.-A.; Rieder, S.; Hasegawa, T.; Penedo, C.; Leeb, T. Seven novel KIT mutations in horses with white coat colour phenotypes. Anim. Genet. 2009, 40, 623–629.
Haase, B.; Jagannathan, V.; Rieder, S.; Leeb, T. A novel KIT variant in an Icelandic horse with white-spotted coat colour. Anim. Genet. 2015, 46, 466.
Haase, B.; Rieder, S.; Tozaki, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Penedo, M.C.T.; Jude, R.; Leeb, T. Five novel KIT mutations in horses with white coat colour phenotypes: BRIEF NOTE. Anim. Genet. 2011, 42, 337–339.
Hauswirth, R.; Jude, R.; Haase, B.; Bellone, R.R.; Archer, S.; Holl, H.; Brooks, S.A.; Tozaki, T.; Penedo, M.C.T.; Rieder, S.; et al. Novel variants in the KIT and PAX3 genes in horses with white-spotted coat colour phenotypes. Anim. Genet. 2013, 44, 763–765.
Hoban, R.; Castle, K.; Hamilton, N.; Haase, B. Novel KIT variants for dominant white in the Australian horse population. Anim. Genet. 2018, 49, 99–100.
Holl, H.; Brooks, S.; Bailey, E. De novo mutation of KIT discovered as a result of a non-hereditary white coat colour pattern: De novo mutation of KIT. Anim. Genet. 2010, 41, 196–198.
Holl, H.M.; Brooks, S.A.; Carpenter, M.L.; Bustamante, C.D.; Lafayette, C. A novel splice mutation within equine KIT and the W15 allele in the homozygous state lead to all white coat color phenotypes. Anim. Genet. 2017, 48, 497–498.
Hug, P.; Jude, R.; Henkel, J.; Jagannathan, V.; Leeb, T. A novel KIT deletion variant in a German Riding Pony with white-spotting coat colour phenotype. Anim. Genet. 2019, 50, 761–763.
Martin, K.; Patterson Rosa, L.; Vierra, M.; Foster, G.; Brooks, S.A.; Lafayette, C. De novo mutation of KIT causes extensive coat white patterning in a family of Berber horses. Anim. Genet. 2021, 52, 135–137.
Esdaile, E.; Kallenberg, A.; Avila, F.; Bellone, R.R. Identification of W13 in the American Miniature Horse and Shetland Pony Populations. Genes 2021, 12, 1985.
Nicholas, F.; Tammen, I.; Hub, S.I. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA). 1995. Available online: https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/31190 (accessed on 17 July 2023).
Avila, F.; Hughes, S.S.; Magdesian, K.G.; Penedo, M.C.T.; Bellone, R.R. Breed Distribution and Allele Frequencies of Base Coat Color, Dilution, and White Patterning Variants across 28 Horse Breeds. Genes 2022, 13, 1641.
Pasternak, M.; Krupiński, J.; Gurgul, A.; Bugno-Poniewierska, M. Genetic, historical and breeding aspects of the occurrence of the tobiano pattern and white markings in the Polish population of Hucul horses–A review. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2020, 48, 21–27.
Pulos, W.L.; Hutt, F.B. Lethal Dominant White in Horses. J. Hered. 1969, 60, 59–63.
McFadden, A.; Vierra, M.; Robilliard, H.; Martin, K.; Brooks, S.A.; Everts, R.E.; Lafayette, C. Population Analysis Identifies 15 Multi-Variant Dominant White Haplotypes in Horses. Animals, 2023; Manuscript submitted for review.
Bellone, R.R.; Holl, H.; Setaluri, V.; Devi, S.; Maddodi, N.; Archer, S.; Sandmeyer, L.; Ludwig, A.; Foerster, D.; Pruvost, M.; et al. Evidence for a retroviral insertion in TRPM1 as the cause of congenital stationary night blindness and leopard complex spotting in the horse. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78280.
Phung, B.; Sun, J.; Schepsky, A.; Steingrimsson, E.; Rönnstrand, L. C-KIT Signaling Depends on Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor for Effects on Cell Proliferation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24064.
Thomas, A.J.; Erickson, C.A. The making of a melanocyte: The specification of melanoblasts from the neural crest. Pigment. Cell Melanoma Res. 2008, 21, 598–610.
Fuse, N.; Yasumoto, K.; Suzuki, H.; Takahashi, K.; Shibahara, S. Identification of a Melanocyte-Type Promoter of the Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor Gene. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996, 219, 702–707.
Jones, S. An overview of the basic helix-loop-helix proteins. Genome Biol. 2004, 5, 226.
Kawakami, A.; Fisher, D.E. The master role of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor in melanocyte and melanoma biology. Lab. Investig. 2017, 97, 649–656.
Williams, D.E.; de Vries, P.; Namen, A.E.; Widmer, M.B.; Lyman, S.D. The Steel factor. Dev. Biol. 1992, 151, 368–376.
Yasumoto, K.; Yokoyama, K.; Shibata, K.; Tomita, Y.; Shibahara, S. Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor as a regulator for melanocyte-specific transcription of the human tyrosinase gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994, 14, 8058–8070.
Yutzey, K.E.; Konieczny, S.F. Different E-box regulatory sequences are functionally distinct when placed within the context of the troponin I enhancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 5105–5113.

© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Upload a video for this entry

Information

Subjects: Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :

Aiden McFadden

Micaela Vierra

Katie Martin

Samantha A. Brooks

Robin E. Everts

Christa Lafayette

View Times: 487

Update Date: 05 Mar 2024

Table of Contents

Video Upload Options

Confirm