Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Krzysztof Widawski
 -- 2556 2024-02-07 08:24:14 |
2 format change
Peter Tang
 Meta information modification 2556 2024-02-07 08:36:14 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Widawski, K.; Krzemińska, A.; Zaręba, A.; Dzikowska, A. Sustainable Tourism in the Rural Environment. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54832 (accessed on 17 May 2024).
Widawski K, Krzemińska A, Zaręba A, Dzikowska A. Sustainable Tourism in the Rural Environment. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54832. Accessed May 17, 2024.
Widawski, Krzysztof, Alicja Krzemińska, Anna Zaręba, Anna Dzikowska. "Sustainable Tourism in the Rural Environment" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54832 (accessed May 17, 2024).
Widawski, K., Krzemińska, A., Zaręba, A., & Dzikowska, A. (2024, February 07). Sustainable Tourism in the Rural Environment. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54832
Widawski, Krzysztof, et al. "Sustainable Tourism in the Rural Environment." Encyclopedia. Web. 07 February, 2024.
Sustainable Tourism in the Rural Environment
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/agriculture13102028

The multiplicity of forms of tourism and leisure activities is due to many factors. These could be a tourist’s interests, curiosity about the world, cultural or recreational offerings, tourist resources, infrastructure, technical possibilities, or a destination understood as a specific area or type of landscape. One of the more popular forms, which combines some of these factors, is rural tourism.

sustainable development rural tourism educational homesteads participation

1. Introduction

Nowadays, it comes as no surprise that tourism can be counted as one of the most significant global economic sectors. Since the end of World War II, it has become one of the fastest-growing sectors of the world economy [1]. The multiplicity of forms of tourism and leisure activities is due to many factors. These could be a tourist’s interests, curiosity about the world, cultural or recreational offerings, tourist resources, infrastructure, technical possibilities, or a destination understood as a specific area or type of landscape. One of the more popular forms nowadays, which combines some of these factors, is rural tourism. Recent decades have been a period of particularly intensive development for this type of tourism [2][3], and this is connected to changes in the rural economy and landscape. It is satisfying, however, when such tourist development is subject to the principles of sustainable development. These are important for the preservation of the environment in which tourism operates on the one hand and, on the other, for the possibility of a type of tourism that minimizes its negative impact on both natural and social environments. Many studies point out [4][5][6][7] that rural tourism is becoming increasingly important all over the world and is seen as a kind of subsidiary strategy for the sustainable development of rural areas. Rural tourism, through the concept of sustainability, focuses on the protection of natural and cultural environmental resources, and explicitly emphasizes the participation of local people and the responsibility of the tourists using its resources [8][9]. The central, or one of the main roles in the development of sustainable rural tourism, is pointed out by many researchers [10][11][12]. It is emphasized in EU documents that sustainability is a contributing factor in the competitiveness of a destination, including rural environments [13], and rural tourism is a viable alternative that can positively influence sustainable regional development in villages and communes with less environmental impact compared with classic tourism models [14][15][16].
Furthermore, global agendas indicate the need to apply sustainable development to the management of rural areas to create a quality tourism product. Agenda 21 pointed out environmental problems and how to manage resources in terms of eco-development above all, as well as guaranteeing a participatory management system for these areas [17]. Rural sustainable tourism also fits in with the objectives set by Agenda 2030 [18] by referring to the following:
  • Objective 1: end poverty (drawing attention to the earning potential of those living in rural poverty).
  • Objective 4: good quality education (improving the quality of education through learning by example and exposure to nature).
  • Objective 7: clean and accessible energy (promoting renewable energy sources in the countryside).
  • Objective 10: less inequality (redressing gender inequalities in tourism product development).
  • Objective 12: responsible consumption and production (sustainable use of space for cultivation and recycling).
  • Objective 13: climate action (sustainable crops and agricultural production).
  • Objective 15: life on land (protection of biodiversity).
In the coming years, the implementation of the goals contained in Agenda 2030 for the economy, including rural tourism, and the monitoring of their implementation, will become one of the most important challenges for the politics and economics of countries worldwide [19].
The need for consultation when initiating a tourism development process in a region is pointed out by many authors [20][21][22]. In recent years and even decades, tourism has become one of the main economic activities in rural areas. It has the potential to definitively generate new sources of income and employment [23] and appears to be crucial to the long-term sustainability of rural areas that attract tourism [24]. Rural tourism can be used as a diversification or adaptation strategy to supplement existing livelihoods and improve the ability of local people to secure income to reduce the risk of economic decline. However, this will not take place without the involvement of the people living in these areas [5]. As long as the local community is increasingly aware of the role of tourism in providing them with additional income or even wealth, a shift in the local economy towards tourism to improve livelihoods is an almost natural direction [23][25]. It can also be a tool for revitalization.
Contemporary approaches to tourism that address negative impacts are not only concerned with minimizing the impacts of tourism but also look at the long-term viability of good quality natural and social resources, the quality of life of communities receiving tourism, visitor satisfaction, and the conservative use of natural and social resources in the context of sustainable tourism development [26][27][28]. The tourism industry was one of those hardest hit by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. In addition to being an important branch of an economy with a large impact on the value of its gross domestic product (GDP), it is also a powerful job base, providing employment for many inhabitants of depopulating villages.
In tourism, sustainability is usually linked to the issue of development and is defined as ‘new tourism’ [29][30], the essence of which is its low environmental impact. Sustainable tourism in rural areas is often reduced to farms hosting tourists, local food and crafts, small-scale businesses, and transport. Almost always in tandem with the development of rural tourism, which emphasizes a sustainable approach, is the need for nature conservation [31]. Its absence can have consequences for the future quality of life of the local community but also for the tourism product offered [32]. Sustainable tourism, including that practiced in the rural environment, focuses on natural and cultural environmental resources in order to protect them, and emphasizes the responsibility of tourists and the need for the local community to participate in these efforts [33]. One of the most salient features of rural tourism today is environmental sustainability, and pro-environmental behavior is recognized as one of the ways to achieve this goal [33][34][35][36][37][38]. Such development is more than just sustainable economic growth. The concept of sustainable development takes into account environmental, economic, cultural, and social factors in rural areas. As Erokhin [39] emphasizes, each element matters, and rural tourism represents a new element of sustainable development in the tourism industry [40][41].
According to Gilbert and Tung [42], rural tourism is a form of tourism in which farmers play an important role, providing tourists with accommodation and the necessary conditions for various leisure activities in a farm environment. It can be seen that rural tourism is multi-faceted, not only because of farming activities but also in terms of the tourist product offered. Bramwell and Lane [43] emphasize other forms such as nature tourism, ecotourism, exploratory tourism, sports tourism, health tourism and other forms of active tourism such as hiking, mountain biking, horse riding, fishing, etc. They also point to forms of tourism related to heritage such as cultural and traditional tourism, folk and ethnic tourism [43][44][45], and educational tourism. Many researchers [46][47] emphasize the link between tourism activities and the rural environment. So far, literature on the subject has emphasized the small scale of the rural tourism market and few have noticed that it is not only seasonal tourism but all year round. This type of tourism has been particularly appreciated since lockdown when the excellent organization of this market was noticed. Two decades ago, Roberts et al. [4] had already emphasized that it is a small-scale but well-managed market, often of great educational value. Thus, proper management and a responsible policy influencing the promotion of rural tourism is crucial. In the EU, the development of rural areas is pivotal. Both Cork declarations 1.0 and 2.0, concerning the future of rural areas, set out the main policy goals to reverse rural migration; fight poverty in the rural environment; stimulate employment; and, finally, meet the demand for quality, health, safety, and personal growth to increase rural environmental quality. Declaration 2.0 goes even further, advocating the promotion of prosperity in rural areas with an emphasis on entrepreneurship, investment, and innovation. It emphasizes the need to invest in their vitality, and this would include the elimination of digital exclusion. An important demand is the protection of the environment, and this should translate into local economic development; the development of ecological forms of tourism; and, more broadly, recreation in rural areas. It is also important to support climate action, especially in the production of sustainable energy from renewable sources, and to increase knowledge and innovation [48]. These postulates have a direct or indirect impact on the development of tourism in rural areas. Sustainable rural tourism is seen in this context as a tool for the development not so much of agriculture (although that too) but as an element stimulating the development of the rural collective economy, which will increase employment opportunities for farmers, promote the marketing of agricultural and other local products, ultimately improve production in rural areas, and improve living conditions by effectively increasing the income received by rural residents [49][50][51]. Non-agricultural activities in the countryside can contribute to the economic growth of a region [14][15][52], and rural tourism provides the opportunity for regional economic, socio-cultural, and environmental sustainability [53][54][55]. This element may also be important in building global food security. Climate change along with the liberalization of trade affect rural agricultural areas and, consequently, the practical survival of small farmers all over the world [56][57][58]. Therefore, the postulate of developing sustainable rural tourism, referring to the principles of social justice and economic profitability, is all the more important [59][60][61].

2. The Concept of Sustainable Development in Rural Tourism

Sustainability in tourism is reflected in three dimensions: economic, social, and environmental. The first refers to income management and the development of institutions and business ventures; the second translates into mutual cooperation, innovation, and creativity; while the third includes environmental awareness, the management of environmental resources in the spirit of rational use, and the management of tourism that occurs in the region [62]. However, other researchers [63][64] point to four dimensions of sustainable activities in the rural environment, which should be coherent at economic, social, environmental, and ecological levels so as to be able to satisfy present needs without harming future generations who will use the same resources. Sustainable development involves appropriate progress simultaneously in all four dimensions [65][66]. This reaches back to the definition proposed in the 1987 Brundtland Report, which defines sustainable development as development that meets the needs of the present without depriving future generations of the opportunity to meet their needs [67]. Three characteristics of sustainable development are mentioned by He [68]. Firstly, both present and future development should be taken into account to avoid harming future generations. Secondly, the development of one aspect should not undermine or restrict the development of others. Thirdly, natural resources—or more broadly, the natural environment—should be protected without abandoning the development of the economy; however, care should be taken to ensure a harmonious relationship between the economy, society, and natural resources. In this view, sustainable tourism development has become widely accepted and is seen as an important and politically appropriate tool for tourism development [69]. It resonates with an approach to tourism as a tool for improving the livelihoods of local communities by identifying tourism as the main remedy to eradicate poverty [70][71]. This is also the case for rural tourism, whose objectives are essentially aligned with those of sustainable development, e.g., eradicating poverty (Objective 1), promoting inclusive and sustainable economic growth as well as full and productive employment and work (Objective 8), and ensuring sustainable consumption and production (Objective 12) [72].

3. Sustainable Rural Tourism and the Local Community

Rural areas are important for tourism development due to the fact that they are ecologically attractive areas offering, in addition to nature, the usually well-preserved traditional culture of the region with its ethno-cultural heritage [73]. Sustainable tourism can, therefore, be an important element of sound socio-economic development. However, nature or traditional folk culture are still not enough for sustainable rural tourism development. A key factor is the local community and its attitude to the functioning of tourism in the region, as its involvement determines possible success in this field [74][75][76]. Without acceptance for various forms of tourism, and products offered in the region expressed in the active involvement of villagers, success cannot be expected [77][78]. By engaging in tourism activities, communities switch from a product-based economy to a service-providing one [79]. Sustainable rural tourism has a better chance of success if all participants in the rural area where tourism activities are to be developed are willing to actively participate in sustainability initiatives [80]. Community-based tourism includes all interactions between local people and external stakeholders [81][82][83].
Community participation in decision-making regarding the tourism product, information exchange, development of knowledge about the tourism industry, and the specifics of its operation can positively influence sustainable rural tourism as well as its social, economic, and environmental characteristics [84][85][86]. Thus, rural tourism appears as another important factor in the development of rural communities [71][87][88]. Studies emphasize the strategic role of rural residents as a group convinced of the need to protect natural resources and aware of their importance [89][90]. Many authors [91][92] focusing on the role of a community in relation to sustainable development have pointed out that a sustainable approach requires a fair distribution of economic benefits among the community when putting forward the need to protect this environment as a fundamental resource both for present and future generations. Therefore, this resource should be skillfully shared with tourists [93].
The local community can also have a significant impact on the tourists using the rural environment and any intention to revisit the region [94]. In order for this to happen, the local community should be properly prepared to act. Thus, stimulation of their creativity, innovation, managerial and social skills, as well as environmental awareness are essential [95]. It is thought that the participatory approach [96] enables the application of sustainable tourism principles by creating more opportunities for local people to gain greater and more sustainable benefits from tourism, leading to the need to protect nature and resources, which stems from this bottom-up belief [97]. Therefore, there is an emerging awareness that it is in their own interest to participate in the decision-making process because all preparatory undertakings affect the life of the community. Participation translates into an opportunity to express hopes, fears, and desires regarding tourism development [98]. The aim of such participation is to protect local residents and the resources available to the region from the impact of tourism planning, and at the same time to be able to benefit from rural tourism development [99]. Community participation is also important because local people are the main stakeholders in rural tourism areas. Stakeholder training should be a top priority, as lack of awareness and participation may lead to failure to implement rural tourism in a sustainable manner. Guo and Huang [100] recognize the interactive relationship between rural community development and rural tourism. Jing-Ming, Du, and Su [101][102] go a step further by arguing that it is even the responsibility of rural communities to support and participate in tourism development. Regardless of their level of involvement, rural community residents are not mere observers of activities undertaken in rural tourism. Their active participation fosters sustainable rural environment development; the rational and subordinate use of both cultural and natural resources; and also an improvement in living standards and the economic situation of farmers, thus increasing employment opportunities. All this can happen provided there is the participation of the rural community in the rural tourism designed for the region.

References

  1. World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) (Ed.) Making Tourism More Sustainable—A Guide for Policy Makers; UNEP: Paris, France; UNWTO: Madrid, Spain, 2005; Available online: https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/8741;jsessionid=EE3263195422834CF41F73C9EDEF75DE (accessed on 25 July 2023).
  2. Ferrari, G.; Vargas-Vargas, M. Environmental sustainable management of small rural tourist enterprises. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2010, 4, 407–414.
  3. Leco, F.; Pérez, A.; Hernández, J.; Campón, A. Rural tourists and their attitudes and motivations towards the practice of environmental activities such as agrotourism. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2013, 7, 255–264.
  4. Hall, D.R.; Roberts, L.; Mitchell, M. New Directions in Rural Tourism; Ashgate: Aldershot, UK, 2003.
  5. Lane, B. What is rural tourism? J. Sustain. Tour. 1994, 2, 7–21.
  6. Richards, G.; Hall, D. (Eds.) Tourism and Sustainable Community Development; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  7. Sharpley, R.; Roberts, L. Rural tourism-10 years on. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2004, 6, 119–124.
  8. Mvula, C.D. Fair trade in tourism to protected areas—A micro case study of wildlife tourism to South Luangwa National Park, Zambia. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2001, 3, 393–405.
  9. Wood, M.E. Ecotourism: Principles, Practices and Policies for Sustainability; United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): Paris, France, 2002.
  10. Falak, S.; Chiun, L.M.; Wee, A.Y. A repositioning strategy for rural tourism in Malaysia—Community’s perspective. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 144, 412–415.
  11. Franzoni, S. Measuring the sustainability performance of the tourism sector. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2015, 16, 22–27.
  12. Lee, T.H.; Hsieh, H.-P. Indicators of sustainable tourism: A case study from a Taiwan’s wetland. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 67, 779–787.
  13. Winter, T.; Kim, S. Exploring the relationship between tourism and poverty using the capability approach. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 29, 1655–1673.
  14. Saarinen, J.; Lenao, M. Integrating tourism to rural development and planning in the developing world. Dev. South. Afr. 2014, 31, 363–372.
  15. Korani, Z.; Shafiei, Z. In search of traces of ‘The Tourist Gaze’ on locals: An ethnographic study in Garmeh village. Iran. J. Tour. Cult. Chang. 2021, 19, 549–567.
  16. Serra Cantallops, A.; Ramon Cardona, J.; Estades Muntaner, R. Characteristics and peculiarities of rural tourism in the Balearic Islands. Tour. Plan. Dev. 2015, 12, 125–144.
  17. Agenda 21: Earth Summit: The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf (accessed on 16 August 2023).
  18. Agenda 2030. Available online: https://www.unic.un.org.pl/files/164/Agenda%202030_pl_2016_ostateczna.pdf (accessed on 16 August 2023).
  19. Hordyjańska, B. Droga do Zrównoważonego Rozwoju w Polsce w Świetle Założeń Agendy 2030; Warszawa, Poland, DIFIN: Wrocław, Poland, 2021.
  20. Nost, E. The power of place: Tourism development in Costa Rica. Tour. Geogr. 2013, 15, 88–106.
  21. Sindiga, I. Wildlife-based tourism in Kenya: Land use conflicts and government compensation policies over protected areas. J. Tour. Stud. 1995, 6, 45–55.
  22. Suchet, A.; Raspaud, M. A case of local rejection of a heritage tourism policy: Tourism and dynamics of change in Abondance, French Alps. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 2010, 16, 449–463.
  23. Mair, H. Global restructuring and local responses: Investigating rural tourism policy in two Canadian communities. Curr. Issues Tour. 2006, 9, 1–45.
  24. Lekovic, K.; Tomic, S.; Maric, D.; Curcic, N. Cognitive Component of the Image of a Rural Tourism Destination as a Sustainable Development Potential. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9413.
  25. Briedenhann, J.; Wickens, E. Rural tourism—Meeting the challenges of the new South Africa. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2004, 6, 189–203.
  26. Widawski, K. (Ed.) Turystyka Kulturowa na Dolnym Śląsku-Wybrane Aspekty; Rozprawy Naukowe Instytut Geografii i Rozwoju Regionalnego Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego: Wrocław, Poland, 2009; Volume 9.
  27. Robinson, M.; Boniface, P. (Eds.) Tourism and Cultural Conflicts; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 1999.
  28. Tosun, C. Challenges of sustainable tourism development: The case of Turkey. Tour. Manag. 2001, 22, 289–303.
  29. Hampton, M.P. Heritage, local communities and economic development. Ann. Tour. Res. 2005, 32, 735–759.
  30. Ashley, C.; Roe, D. Enhancing Community Involvement in Wildlife Tourism: Issues and Challenges; Wildlife and Development Series No. 11; International Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK, 1998.
  31. Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rolnictwo-lesnictwo/ (accessed on 27 August 2023).
  32. Berry, S.; Ladkin, A. Sustainable Tourism: A Regional Perspective. Tour. Manag. 1997, 18, 434–440.
  33. Huete-Alcocer, N.; Valero-Tévar, M.Á. Impact of Information Sources on Promoting Tourism in a Rural Region: The Case of the Roman Villa of Noheda. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8038.
  34. Garcia-Esparza, J.A. Revitalization of architectural and ethnological heritage: Recovery of vernacular building techniques in a 19th-century winery. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2014, 8, 140–159.
  35. Sbarcea, M.; Tudor, M. Tradition and modernity in Danube Delta architecture contemporary intervention towards sustainable settings. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 2016, 17, 1194–1202.
  36. Wu, J.; Font, X.; Liu, J. Tourists’ Pro-environmental Behaviors: Moral Obligation or Disengagement? J. Travel Res. 2020, 60, 735–748.
  37. Widawski, K.; Oleśniewicz, P. Thematic Tourist Trails: Sustainability Assessment Methodology. The Case of Land Flowing with Milk and Honey. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3841.
  38. Jamal, T.; Higham, J. Justice and ethics: Towards a new platform for tourism and sustainability. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021, 29, 143–157.
  39. Erokhin, V.; Heijman, W.; Ivolga, A. Sustainable Rural Development in Russia through Diversification: The Case of the Stavropol Region. Visegr. J. Bioecon. Sustain. Dev. 2014, 3, 20–25.
  40. Tao, L.I.U.; Fuying, X. Research on the Driving Force of the Sustainable Development of Rural Tourism in the New Rural Construction. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2010, 38, 2102–2104.
  41. Palacios-Florencio, B.; Santos-Roldán, L.; Berbel-Pineda, J.M.; Castillo-Canalejo, A.M. Sustainable Tourism as a Driving Force of the Tourism Industry in a Post-COVID-19 Scenario. Soc. Indic. Res. 2021, 158, 991–1011.
  42. Gilbert, D.; Tung, L. Public Organizations and Rural Marketing Planning in England and Wales. Tour. Manag. 1990, 11, 164–172.
  43. Bramwell, B.; Lane, B. Rural Tourism and Sustainable Rural Development. J. Sustain. Tour. 1995, 2, 1–129.
  44. Pechlaner, H.; Bialk-Wolf, A.; Zacher, D. The Role of Cultural Activities in Tourism Development: An Urban–Rural Perspective. Tour. Cult. Commun. 2015, 15, 47–58.
  45. Reichel, A.; Lowengart, O.; Milman, A. Rural tourism in Israel: Service quality and orientation. Tour. Manag. 2000, 21, 451–459.
  46. Milman, A.; Jones, F.; Bach, S. The Impact of Security Devices on Tourists’ Perceived Safety: The Central Florida Example. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 1999, 23, 371–386.
  47. Fleischer, A.; Felsenstein, D. Support for Rural Tourism: Does it Make a Difference? Ann. Tour. Res. 2000, 27, 1007–1024.
  48. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/enrd/sites/default/files/cork-declaration_pl.pdf (accessed on 27 June 2023).
  49. Anup, K.C.; Parajuli, R.B.T. Tourism and Its Impact on Livelihood in Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2014, 16, 1053–1063.
  50. Mbaiwa, J.E.; Stronza, A.L. The Effects of Tourism Development on Rural Livelihoods in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. J. Sustain. Tour. 2010, 18, 635–656.
  51. Yang, Q.-Z.; Xiang, Y. The Research on the Contribution of Rural Tourism to Peasants’ Income—Based on the Empirical Analysis of Chengdu. Econ. Probl. 2012, 9, 125–127.
  52. Mutlu Danacı, H.; Gülten, R.E. Ecotourism and Vernacular Architecture in Koprulu Canyon. J. World Turks 2013, 5, 41–46.
  53. Yun, H.J. Spatial Relationships of Cultural Amenities in Rural Tourism Areas. Tour. Plan. Dev. 2014, 11, 452–462.
  54. Ivona, A. Sustainability of Rural Tourism and Promotion of Local Development. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8854.
  55. Erokhin, V. Approaches to sustainable rural development in a predominantly non-rural region. Ekon. Poljopr. 2014, 61, 291–306.
  56. Allen, P. Together at the Table: Sustainability and Sustenance in the American Agrifood System; Pennsylvania State University Press: University Park, TX, USA, 2004.
  57. Cawley, M.; Gillmor, D.A. Integrated rural tourism: Concepts and practice. Ann. Tour. Res. 2008, 35, 316–337.
  58. Wright, W.; Middendorf, G. (Eds.) The Fight over Food: Producers, Consumers, and Activists Challenge the Global Food System; Pennsylvania State University Press: University Park, TX, USA, 2008.
  59. Swarbrooke, J.; Horner, S. Consumer Behavior in Tourism; Butterworth-Heinemann: Burlington, MA, USA, 2004.
  60. Mitchell, M.; Hall, D. Rural tourism as sustainable business: Key themes and issues. In Rural Tourism and Sustainable Business; Hall, D., Kirkpatrick, I., Mitchell, M., Eds.; Channel View Publications: Tonawanda, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 3–16.
  61. Butler, R.W. Sustainable tourism: A state-of the-art review. Tour. Geogr. 1999, 1, 7–25.
  62. Utami, D.D.; Dhewanto, W.; Lestari, Y.D. Rural tourism entrepreneurship success factors for sustainable tourism village: Evidence from Indonesia. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2023, 10, 2180845.
  63. Andrei, D.R.; Sandu, M.; Gogonea, R.M.; Chiritescu, V.; Kruszlicika, M. Modeling of rural tourism towards sustainable development from the perspective of specifically organic food. Econ. Eng. Agric. Rural. Dev. 2012, 12, 7–12.
  64. Štreimikienė, D.; Mikalauskienė, A.; Mikalauskas, I. Comparative Assessment of Sustainable Energy Development in the Czech Republic, Lithuania and Slovakia. J. Compet. 2016, 8, 31–41.
  65. Blancas, F.; Lozano-Oyola, M.; González, M.; Guerrero, F.; Caballero, R. How to use sustainability indicators for tourism planning: The case of rural tourism in Andalusia (Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 412–413, 28–45.
  66. Trukhachev, A. Methodology for Evaluating the Rural Tourism Potentials: A Tool to Ensure Sustainable Development of Rural Settlements. Sustainability 2015, 7, 3052–3070.
  67. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2023).
  68. He, W. Sustainable Rural Tourism Development and Environment Protection. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 347–353, 2893–2896.
  69. Sharpley, R. Rural Tourism and Sustainablility—A Critique. In New Directions in Rural Tourism; Hall, D., Roberts, L., Mitchell, M., Eds.; Ashgate Publishing Limited: Aldershot, UK, 2003; pp. 38–53.
  70. Blackstock, K. A critical look at community-based tourism. Community Dev. J. 2005, 40, 39–49.
  71. Croes, R.; Vanegas, M. Cointegration and causality between tourism and poverty reduction. J. Travel Res. 2008, 47, 94–103.
  72. Ayazlar, G.; Ayazlar, R.A. Rural Tourism: A Conceptual Approach. In Tourism, Environment and Sustainability; Avcikurt, C., Dinu, M., Hacioglu, N., Efe, R., Soykan, A., Eds.; St. Kliment Ohridski University Press: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2015; pp. 167–185.
  73. Stetic, S. Specific features of rural tourism destinations management. J. Settl. Spat. Plan. 2012, 1, 131–137.
  74. Eshliki, S.A.; Kaboudi, M. Perception of community in tourism impacts and their participation in tourism planning: Ramsar, Iran. J. Asian Behav. Stud. 2012, 2, 51–64.
  75. Mohammad, M.; Khalifah, Z.; Hosseini, H. Local people perceptions toward social, economic and environmental impacts of tourism in Kermanshah (Iran). Asian Soc. Sci. 2010, 6, 220–225.
  76. Shen, F.; Hughey KF, D.; Simmons, D.G. Connecting the sustainable livelihoods approach and tourism: A review of the literature. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2008, 15, 19–31.
  77. Bimonte, S.; Punzo, L.F. Tourist Development and Host-Guest Interaction: An Economic Exchange Theory. Ann. Tour. Res. 2016, 58, 128–139.
  78. Andriotis, K.; Vaughan, D. Urban Residents’ Attitudes toward Tourism Development: The Case of Crete. J. Travel Res. 2003, 42, 172–185.
  79. Chok, S.; Macbeth, J. Tourism as a tool for poverty alleviation: A critical analysis of ‘pro-poor tourism’ and implications for sustainability. Curr. Issues Tour. 2007, 10, 144–164.
  80. Schweinsberg, S.C.; Leslie Wearing, S.; Darcy, S. Understanding communities’ views of nature in rural industry renewal: The transition from forestry to nature-based tourism in Eden, Australia. J. Sustain. Tour. 2012, 20, 195–213.
  81. Gabriel-Campos, E.; Werner-Masters, K.; Cordova-Buiz, F.; Paucar-Caceres, A. Community eco-tourism in rural Peru: Resilience and adaptive capacities to the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021, 48, 416–427.
  82. Hwang, D.; Stewart, W.P.; Ko, D. Community behavior and sustainable rural tourism development. J. Travel Res. 2012, 51, 328–341.
  83. Merkel Arias, N.; Kieffer, M. Participatory action research for the assessment of community based rural tourism: A case study of co-construction of tourism sustainability indicators in Mexico. Curr. Issues Tour. 2023, 26, 2083–2100.
  84. Verbole, A. Actors, Discourses and Interfaces of Rural Tourism Development at the Local Community Level in Slovenia: Social and Political Dimensions of the Rural Tourism Development Process. J. Sustain. Tour. 2000, 8, 479–490.
  85. Ertuna, B.; Kirbas, G. Local Community Involvement in Rural Tourism Development: The Case of Kastamonu, Turkey. PASOS Rev. Tur. Patrim. Cult. 2012, 10, 17–24.
  86. Zou, T.; Huan, S.; Ding, P. Toward a Community-Driven Development Model of Rural Tourism: The Chinese Experience. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2014, 16, 261–271.
  87. Gannon, A. Rural Tourism as a Factor in Rural Community Economic Development for Economies in Transition. J. Sustain. Tour. 1994, 2, 51–60.
  88. Anderson, W. Cultural tourism and poverty alleviation in rural Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. J. Tour. Cult. Chang. 2015, 13, 208–224.
  89. Lee, S.; Kim, D.; Park, S.; Lee, W. A study on the strategic decision making used in the revitalization of fishing village tourism: Using A’WOT analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7472.
  90. Mikhaylova, A.A.; Wendt, J.A.; Hvaley, D.V.; Bógdał-Brzezińska, A.; Mikhaylov, A.S. Impact of cross-border tourism on the sustainable development of rural areas in the Russian-Polish and Russian-Kazakh borderlands. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2409.
  91. Choi, H.C.; Sirakaya, E. Sustainability indicators for managing community tourism. Tour. Manag. 2006, 27, 1274–1289.
  92. Ghoddousi, S.; Pintassilgo, P.; Mendes, J.; Ghoddousi, A.; Sequeira, B. Tourism and nature conservation: A case study in Golestan National Park, Iran. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2018, 26, 20–27.
  93. Chin, C.H.; Thian, S.S.-Z.; Lo, M.C. Community’s experiential knowledge on the development of rural tourism competitive advantage: A study on kampung semadang–borneo heights, Sarawak. Tour. Rev. 2017, 72, 238–260.
  94. Lo, M.C.; Chin, C.H.; Law, F.Y. Tourists’ perspectives on hard and soft services toward rural tourism destination competitiveness: Community support as a moderator. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2019, 19, 139–157.
  95. Ataei, P.; Karimi, H.; Ghadermarzi, H.; Norouzi, A. A conceptual model of entrepreneurial competencies and their impacts on rural youth’s intention to launch SMEs. J. Rural Stud. 2020, 75, 185–195.
  96. Tosun, C. Expected nature of community participation in tourism development. Tour. Manag. 2006, 27, 493–504.
  97. Inskeep, E. National and Regional Tourism Planning: Methodologies and Case Studies; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  98. Timothy, D.J.; Tosun, C. Tourists’ Perceptions of the Canada-USA Border as a Barrier to Tourism at the International Peace Garden. Tour. Manag. 2003, 24, 411–421.
  99. Timothy, D.J. Cross-Border Partnership in Tourism Resource Management: International Parks along the US-Canada Border. J. Sustain. Tour. 1999, 7, 182–205.
  100. Guo, W.; Huang, Z.F. Study on the Development of Community Power and Functions under the Background of the Development of Rural Tourism—Based on the Investigation of Two Typical Cases in Daizu Garden and Yubeng Community, Yunnan Province. Tour. Trib. 2011, 26, 83–92.
  101. Jing-Ming, H.E. A Study on Rural Tourism Overseas. Tour. Trib. 2003, 1, 76–80.
  102. Du, Z.B.; Su, Q. Study on the Relationship between the Community Participation of Rural Tourism, Residents’ Perceived Tourism Impact and Sense of Community Involvement—A Case Study of Anji Rural Tourism Destination, Zhejiang Province. Tour. Trib. 2011, 26, 65–70.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Krzysztof Widawski
,
Alicja Krzemińska
,
Anna Zaręba
,
Anna Dzikowska
View Times: 220
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 07 Feb 2024
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback