Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 3270 2024-02-07 07:46:44 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 3270 2024-02-07 07:54:27 | |
3 format correct -3 word(s) 3267 2024-02-19 07:19:34 | |
4 format correction Meta information modification 3267 2024-06-11 04:48:51 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
How, M.; Cheah, S. Quantum AI Integration for Industry Transformation. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54830 (accessed on 25 June 2024).
How M, Cheah S. Quantum AI Integration for Industry Transformation. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54830. Accessed June 25, 2024.
How, Meng-Leong, Sin-Mei Cheah. "Quantum AI Integration for Industry Transformation" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54830 (accessed June 25, 2024).
How, M., & Cheah, S. (2024, February 07). Quantum AI Integration for Industry Transformation. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54830
How, Meng-Leong and Sin-Mei Cheah. "Quantum AI Integration for Industry Transformation." Encyclopedia. Web. 07 February, 2024.
Quantum AI Integration for Industry Transformation
Edit

The fusion of quantum computing and artificial intelligence (AI) heralds a transformative era for Industry 4.0, offering unprecedented capabilities and challenges

quantum computing artificial intelligence quantum AI Industry 4.0

1. Introduction

In the age of rapid technological evolution, the fusion of quantum computing and artificial intelligence (AI) emerges as a groundbreaking intersection that promises unparalleled computational prowess and advanced intelligence. Jyothi and Dutt [1] observe that this union between quantum computing and AI holds transformative potential for a multitude of sectors, collectively encapsulated under the Industry 4.0 umbrella. However, while the potential benefits of quantum AI are immense, Kim, Pan, and Park [2] argue that their integration into the existing industrial ecosystem presents multifaceted challenges. Organizations must navigate complex terrains of change management, foster cultures of continuous innovation, and remain agile in the face of unpredictable technological trajectories.
In the throes of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, characterized by a fusion of technologies blurring the lines between the physical, digital, and biological spheres, lies a powerful emergent force: quantum computing-enhanced AI. Senekanke, Maseli, and Taele [3] put forth that this technological synergy is poised to redefine the landscape of industry and commerce, heralding a new epoch of innovation and efficiency. The profound implications of integrating quantum computing with AI—quantum AI—beckon a significant transformation, especially in the realm of Industry 4.0, where interconnectedness and smart automation are paramount.

2. The Fusion of Quantum Computing and AI

2.1. Basics of Quantum Computing

This section provides an introduction to the fundamental concepts underpinning quantum computing. The realm of quantum computing stands at the intersection of computer science and quantum mechanics, offering computational power beyond what classical computing could hope to achieve. Nielsen and Chuang [4] demonstrate that by tapping into the principles of quantum mechanics, quantum computers possess the potential to address problems that are currently computationally intractable.
At the heart of classical computers are bits, which can either be in a state of 0 or 1. Quantum computers, on the other hand, use qubits. Unlike bits, qubits can exist in a state of 0, 1, or any quantum superposition of these states. This allows them to perform many calculations at once [5]. Two core principles of quantum mechanics are foundational for quantum computing: superposition and entanglement. While a classical computer bit must be either 0 or 1, a qubit can be 0, 1, or both 0 and 1 due to superposition. This trait facilitates quantum computers to explore a vast number of potential solutions simultaneously [6]. Entanglement is a uniquely quantum phenomenon where qubits become interconnected and the state of one qubit can depend on the state of another, regardless of the distance between them. Horodecki et al. [7] show that this interconnectedness can be harnessed in quantum computing for more intricate and synchronized operations.
Classical computers use logical gates (e.g., AND, OR, NOT) to perform operations on bits. Similarly, quantum computers use quantum gates to perform operations on qubits. However, because of the unique properties of qubits, quantum gates work differently. They manipulate an input qubit to produce new superposition states. When multiple gates are combined, they form quantum circuits that execute complex quantum algorithms [8].
The inherent parallelism of quantum computers due to superposition and entanglement facilitates what is often termed as “quantum speedup”. It refers to the potential of quantum computers to solve certain problems exponentially faster than classical counterparts. For example, Shor’s [9] algorithm can factor large numbers in polynomial time, much quicker than the best known algorithms for classical computers.
Despite the promise of quantum computing, there are hardware implementation challenges. Quantum computers operate based on the superposition and entanglement of qubits. Maintaining quantum coherence, where qubits retain their quantum state, is essential for accurate computations. However, preserving this state requires isolating the qubits from any external environment that can cause decoherence, effectively collapsing the quantum state [10]. Another of the primary challenges is decoherence. Quantum information in a qubit can be lost due to its interactions with the external environment, leading to errors in calculations. Ensuring qubit stability and minimizing decoherence are crucial areas of ongoing research [11]. Unlike classical bits, qubits cannot be copied due to the no-cloning theorem, complicating error detection and correction. Quantum error correction codes exist, but they require a significant overhead of physical qubits to encode a single logical qubit, which exacerbates the challenge of scaling quantum computers. Building a fault-tolerant quantum computer, which can perform accurate computations even in the presence of errors, is a paramount challenge. It involves not just correcting errors but ensuring that the entire quantum system can continue to operate reliably when individual components fail [12]. Scaling up the number of qubits in a quantum computer is not merely a matter of adding more of them. Each added qubit increases the complexity of the system exponentially. This includes not just maintaining coherence and correcting errors but also the practical aspect of connecting and controlling qubits. As the system scales, individually addressing and controlling each qubit becomes increasingly challenging. Ensuring that qubits interact with one another precisely as intended, without unwanted crosstalk or interference, requires sophisticated control mechanisms [13]. Further, many quantum computing models, especially those based on superconducting qubits, require cryogenic temperatures to function. Maintaining such conditions is energy-intensive and costly, posing logistical and operational challenges [14]. While the promise of quantum computing is profound, the journey towards practical, scalable quantum computers is replete with significant hardware challenges. Overcoming these hurdles necessitates not just technological innovation but a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating insights from physics, materials science, engineering, and computer science. As research continues to advance, each challenge overcome represents a substantial step towards realizing the transformative potential of quantum computing.
Nevertheless, quantum computing offers a paradigm shift in how we approach computation. By exploiting the principles of quantum mechanics, it promises unparalleled computational might. As we venture into the nexus of quantum computing and AI, it is essential to appreciate the foundational quantum principles and their transformative potential.

2.2. Quantum Computing Advancements in AI

Quantum computing and AI are two of the most transformative technologies of our era. Their convergence has the potential to redefine the boundaries of computational capabilities. This section explores how advancements in quantum computing can revolutionize various facets of AI, from data processing to complex problem solving [15].
Machine learning, a subset of AI, involves algorithms adjusting and improving their performance through exposure to data. Quantum machine learning (QML) integrates quantum algorithms into these processes, promising substantial speed-ups. For instance, certain QML algorithms can achieve tasks like linear regression and matrix inversion exponentially faster than their classical counterparts [16]. Dunjko and Briegel [17] prove that the inherent parallelism of quantum systems allows QML models to process large datasets more efficiently, potentially revolutionizing fields such as drug discovery, financial modeling, and more.
Many AI applications, such as neural network training or combinatorial optimization, boil down to optimization problems. Farhi et al. [18] assert that quantum computing can offer a more efficient way to find optimal solutions in vast solution spaces. In particular, quantum annealers and quantum approximate optimization algorithms are pioneering techniques in this direction, holding promise for real-world applications like supply chain optimization, scheduling, and portfolio management.
As AI systems become more integrated into critical infrastructure, their security becomes paramount. Quantum computing can play a dual role here. On the one hand, it poses a threat to classical cryptographic systems; on the other, it offers quantum cryptographic methods that are theoretically unbreakable. Quantum key distribution (QKD) and quantum-secure encryption can ensure AI operations remain secure against even quantum adversaries [19].
Generative models in AI aim to produce new, synthetic instances of data that can pass for real data. Quantum generative adversarial networks (QGANs) integrate quantum computing to enhance these models, allowing them to generate data samples more efficiently and with higher fidelity, particularly beneficial in areas where high-quality data generation is essential, such as drug development or materials science [20].
Search operations, fundamental to many AI processes, can be significantly sped up with quantum computing. Grover’s [21] algorithm, a quantum technique, can search an unsorted database in the square root of the time a classical algorithm would take, leading to quadratic speed-up. Such advancements could be pivotal for tasks like database querying, pattern recognition, and more.
The confluence of AI and quantum computing symbolizes a paradigm shift in computational approaches. Quantum-enhanced AI can tackle challenges currently beyond the reach of classical AI, potentially leading to breakthroughs across diverse domains. As quantum hardware continues to mature and quantum algorithms become more sophisticated, the synergy of quantum computing and AI will likely form the bedrock of next-gen technological innovations.

2.3. Potential Applications and Transformative Power of Quantum-Enhanced AI

The synergy between quantum computing and AI is more than just academic interest; it is a gateway to a series of applications that could redefine industries and our daily lives. This section highlights potential applications of quantum-enhanced AI, outlining the transformative power it holds for a myriad of sectors.
In pharmaceutical research, determining the molecular structure and interactions is computationally intensive. Cao et al. [22] find that quantum-enhanced AI can provide a decisive advantage in simulating molecular dynamics, predicting drug interactions, and optimizing drug designs. Furthermore, AI models for diagnosing diseases or predicting patient trajectories can benefit from quantum-accelerated training, paving the way for more accurate and rapid diagnostics.
The financial sector relies on complex modeling, from predicting market trends to optimizing portfolios. Quantum algorithms can speed up tasks like Monte Carlo simulations, which are instrumental in risk analysis. Quantum-enhanced AI can provide more accurate and rapid solutions for financial optimization problems, potentially revolutionizing investment strategies and financial risk management [23].
Predicting climate change requires analyzing vast and intricate datasets. O’Gorman et al. [24] show that quantum-enhanced AI can dramatically speed up simulations, offering a more granular insight into climate phenomena, which is pivotal for shaping informed environmental policies and strategies [24].
Smart manufacturing and logistics in Industry 4.0 represents the new era of manufacturing that integrates AI, IoT, and other technologies. Houssein et al. [25] assert that quantum-enhanced AI can optimize manufacturing processes, from raw material procurement to the final product delivery. In logistics, it can provide solutions for the traveling salesman problem, routing optimization, and supply chain management, offering more efficient and cost-effective operations.
With cyber threats evolving in complexity, classical cryptographic methods face potential vulnerabilities. Quantum-enhanced AI can revolutionize cybersecurity, providing quantum encryption techniques like quantum key distribution (QKD) that ensures unparalleled security, especially in an era where data are the new oil [26].
Quantum-enhanced AI has a significant role to play in energy and power management in optimizing grid distribution, as well as in the researching of new sustainable energy sources. Perdomo-Ortiz et al. [27] point out that it can lead to more efficient energy consumption and the predictive maintenance of power infrastructures, and even aid in the design and analysis of new materials for energy storage.
In aerospace and defense, quantum-enhanced AI could be pivotal in real-time strategy optimizations, secure communications, and enhanced radar or imaging systems. The capabilities could be transformational for defense operations, space explorations, and aerospace innovations [28].
The blend of quantum computing and AI heralds a future where computational boundaries are exponentially expanded. From healthcare to defense, the potential applications underscore a transformative power that can address some of the most pressing challenges of our times. As research advances and as industries begin to adopt these nascent technologies, the horizon of what is achievable broadens, ushering in an era marked by unprecedented innovation and solutions.

3. Innovation Strategies for Quantum AI Integration

3.1. Fostering a Culture of Continuous Learning

The integration of quantum computing and AI into the core operations of any organization not only demands state-of-the-art technical frameworks but also an adaptable and continually learning workforce. The importance of creating a culture where continuous learning is both encouraged and valued cannot be understated, especially in the fast-paced and complex landscape of quantum AI. This section dives deep into the significance, strategies, and benefits of fostering a culture of continuous learning for quantum AI integration.
Quantum computing and AI, by their inherent nature, are fields in flux. What is considered a breakthrough today may become a standard tomorrow. Harrow and Montanaro [29] remind us that for organizations aiming to stay at the forefront of this technological revolution, the ability of their workforce to adapt and upskill in real time is paramount.
Strategies for cultivating continuous learning must be utilized. Braxton [30] observes that digital platforms and tools that offer courses on quantum mechanics, AI algorithms, and their intersections can be vital. These platforms can be in-house or sourced from reputed online educational institutions. Hands-on workshops led by experts can offer practical insights into the evolving world of quantum AI. They provide a space for employees to ask questions, engage in problem-solving, and witness real-world applications. Ahmadi and Vogel [31] suggest that organizations can incentivize continuous learning through career progression, monetary rewards, or recognition. Such incentives can motivate employees to take ownership of their personal development. Implementing feedback loops where employees can share their learning experiences, suggest improvements, and highlight areas of interest can provide valuable insights into curating more effective learning programs [32]. Establishing internal communities or groups where enthusiasts can discuss, share, and collaborate on quantum AI projects can foster an environment of mutual learning [33].
Reese [34] elucidates that there are benefits that could emerge from a continuous learning culture. A continuously learning workforce can swiftly adapt to technological shifts, ensuring that the organization remains agile in its strategic and operational domains. Saunila [35] suggests that as employees dive deep into quantum AI, they can come up with novel solutions and ideas, driving innovation from within [35]. Top talents are often attracted to organizations that prioritize learning and development. Marin [36] observes that a robust learning culture can thus be a magnet for such talents while also ensuring lower attrition rates. Yu and Cannella [37] concur that organizations that prioritize continuous learning are more likely to stay ahead of the curve in quantum AI advancements, securing a competitive edge in the market.
As quantum AI continues to mold the future of industries across the globe, the onus is on organizations to ensure their workforce is not just keeping up but thriving. Fostering a culture of continuous learning is not merely a strategy; it is an imperative for sustained success in the quantum AI age.

3.2. Collaborative Ecosystems and Partnerships

The interdisciplinary nature of quantum computing and AI makes collaboration not just beneficial but crucial. The rapid pace of innovation in these fields necessitates that organizations seek collaborative ecosystems and partnerships to remain on the cutting edge. This section delves into the significance, strategies, and advantages of fostering collaboration in the realm of quantum AI integration.
The significance of collaborative ecosystems cannot be overstated. Bouncken et al. [38] posit that the combination of quantum computing and AI is an intricate web of physics, computer science, machine learning, and data analytics. No single entity can claim expertise across all these domains. By establishing a collaborative ecosystem, organizations can pool together expertise, resources, and insights, fostering a conducive environment for holistic development.
Strategies are useful for building collaborative partnerships. Universities and research institutions are often at the forefront of quantum and AI innovation. Perkmann and Walsh [39] suggest that partnering with these institutions can facilitate access to cutting-edge research, infrastructure, and emerging talents. Numerous start-ups are specializing in quantum technologies and AI solutions. Collaborating with such start-ups can infuse fresh perspectives and agile methodologies into larger organizations [40]. Building alliances with industry peers can be mutually beneficial. Dyer and Nobeoka [41] agree that such partnerships can lead to shared R&D efforts, standardization initiatives, and even co-developed products. In cross-sector collaborations, sometimes breakthroughs can emerge from unexpected quarters. Enkel and Gassmann [42] propose that partnerships with organizations from seemingly unrelated sectors can bring in unique solutions to complex problems. Quantum and AI developments are not confined to any particular region. Collaborating with entities from different parts of the world can bring in diverse insights and a broader range of expertise [43].
Tolstykh et al. [44] assert that there are advantages in having collaborative ecosystems. Shared R&D efforts mean shared costs, making it economically viable to venture into ambitious projects. Collaborative ecosystems bring together experts from varied domains, ensuring comprehensive problem-solving approaches [45]. With pooled resources and expertise, the development lifecycle can be expedited, leading to faster product launches or solution deployments [46]. Collaboration often allows for the risks associated with research, development, and market exploration to be distributed among partners [47]. Gulati [48] suggests that collaborative partnerships can expand an organization’s network, opening doors to future collaborations, client relationships, and market expansions.
As quantum computing and AI continue to reshape the landscape of modern industries, the role of collaborative ecosystems and partnerships becomes increasingly central. By embracing a collaborative approach, organizations can ensure they remain adaptable, informed, and at the forefront of technological evolution in the quantum AI era.

3.3. R&D Investment and Risk Mitigation

As quantum computing and AI integration advances, the research and development (R&D) landscape is set to witness unprecedented growth. While the prospects of achieving groundbreaking solutions are high, so are the associated risks. This section focuses on the significance of R&D investment in the quantum AI domain and strategies for effective risk mitigation.
It is imperative to have R&D investment. The confluence of quantum computing and AI offers a wealth of opportunities for technological advancements. However, navigating this nascent field requires significant R&D endeavors. Willcocks and Smith [49] argue that beyond merely enhancing products or services, R&D in this context serves as a foundational pillar for securing a competitive position in the rapidly evolving landscape.
Effective strategies in R&D investment must be used. Grant [50] explains that establishing clear R&D objectives aligned with the organization’s strategic goals ensures that efforts are directed toward projects with the highest potential ROI. Quantum AI is at the intersection of multiple disciplines. Forming cross-functional teams ensures a comprehensive approach to research, tapping into diverse expertise [51]. Given the experimental nature of quantum AI, adopting iterative R&D processes, where projects undergo regular reviews and refinements, can optimize outcomes [52]. Partnering with universities, research institutions, or specialized start-ups can enhance R&D capabilities, providing access to a broader talent pool and specialized infrastructure [53].
Risk mitigation is necessary in quantum AI R&D. McGrath [54] advises that distributing investments across a range of projects can spread and reduce risk. If one project faces challenges, others might still succeed. Davila and Wouters [55] assert that periodic audits can identify potential bottlenecks, resource constraints, or feasibility issues, allowing for timely corrective actions. Edmondson and Mcmanus [56] suggest that encouraging feedback from internal teams and external partners can provide early indicators of potential risks or areas for improvement. Cohen and Levinthal [57] note that investing in training and capacity-building initiatives ensures that the R&D team is equipped with the latest skills and knowledge, reducing technical and competency-related risks. Regular market assessments can guide R&D efforts to align with market demands, minimizing the risk of developing solutions that do not meet market needs [58].
Chesbrough [59] observes that with effective investment and risk mitigation strategies in place, organizations can anticipate the future. Robust R&D initiatives can lead to the development of pioneering quantum AI solutions, creating new market opportunities [59]. Teece [60] finds that organizations that are proactive in their R&D endeavors are more likely to stay ahead of the curve, distinguishing themselves from competitors [60]. Continual R&D efforts foster an environment of learning and innovation, enhancing the skills and expertise of the involved teams [61].
While the integration of quantum computing and AI heralds a new era of possibilities, navigating this domain necessitates calculated R&D investments complemented by effective risk mitigation. Organizations that master this balance are poised to harness the transformative potential of quantum AI.

References

  1. Jyothi Ahuja, N.; Dutt, S. Implications of Quantum Science on Industry 4.0: Challenges and Opportunities. In Quantum and Blockchain for Modern Computing Systems: Vision and Advancements; Kumar, A., Gill, S.S., Abraham, A., Eds.; Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 133, pp. 183–204. ISBN 978-3-031-04612-4.
  2. Kim, D.; Kang, J.; Kim, T.W.; Pan, Y.; Park, J.H. The Future of Quantum Information: Challenges and Vision. J. Inf. Process. Syst. 2021, 17, 151–162.
  3. Senekane, M.; Maseli, M.; Taele, M.B. Noisy, Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computing and Industrial Revolution 4.0. In The Disruptive Fourth Industrial Revolution; Doorsamy, W., Paul, B.S., Marwala, T., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 674, pp. 205–225. ISBN 978-3-030-48229-9.
  4. Nielsen, M.A.; Chuang, I.L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2010; ISBN 978-1-107-00217-3.
  5. Mermin, N.D. Quantum Computer Science: An Introduction, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; ISBN 978-0-521-87658-2.
  6. Vedral, V. Introduction to Quantum Information Science; Oxford Graduate Texts; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2006; ISBN 978-0-19-921570-6.
  7. Horodecki, R.; Horodecki, P.; Horodecki, M.; Horodecki, K. Quantum Entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 865–942.
  8. Kitaev, A.J.; Šen, A.C.; Vjalyj, M.N.; Kitaev, A.J. Classical and Quantum Computation; Graduate Studies in Mathematics; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2002; ISBN 978-0-8218-3229-5.
  9. Shor, P.W. Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer. SIAM J. Comput. 1997, 26, 1484–1509.
  10. Preskill, J. Quantum Computing in the NISQ Era and Beyond. Quantum 2018, 2, 79.
  11. Villar, P.I.; Lombardo, F.C. Decoherence of a Solid-State Qubit by Different Noise Correlation Spectra. Phys. Lett. A 2015, 379, 246–254.
  12. Terhal, B.M. Quantum Error Correction for Quantum Memories. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015, 87, 307–346.
  13. Monroe, C.R.; Schoelkopf, R.J.; Lukin, M.D. Quantum Connections. Sci. Am. 2016, 314, 50–57.
  14. Oliver, W.D.; Welander, P.B. Materials in Superconducting Quantum Bits. MRS Bull. 2013, 38, 816–825.
  15. Biamonte, J.; Wittek, P.; Pancotti, N.; Rebentrost, P.; Wiebe, N.; Lloyd, S. Quantum Machine Learning. Nature 2017, 549, 195–202.
  16. Schuld, M.; Sinayskiy, I.; Petruccione, F. An Introduction to Quantum Machine Learning. Contemp. Phys. 2015, 56, 172–185.
  17. Dunjko, V.; Briegel, H.J. Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence in the Quantum Domain: A Review of Recent Progress. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2018, 81, 074001.
  18. Farhi, E.; Goldstone, J.; Gutmann, S.; Zhou, L. The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model at Infinite Size. Quantum 2022, 6, 759.
  19. Pirandola, S.; Eisert, J.; Weedbrook, C.; Furusawa, A.; Braunstein, S.L. Advances in Quantum Teleportation. Nat. Photon 2015, 9, 641–652.
  20. Zoufal, C.; Lucchi, A.; Woerner, S. Quantum Generative Adversarial Networks for Learning and Loading Random Distributions. NPJ Quantum Inf. 2019, 5, 103.
  21. Grover, L.K. A Fast Quantum Mechanical Algorithm for Database Search. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing—STOC’96, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 22–24 May 1996; pp. 212–219.
  22. Cao, Y.; Romero, J.; Olson, J.P.; Degroote, M.; Johnson, P.D.; Kieferová, M.; Kivlichan, I.D.; Menke, T.; Peropadre, B.; Sawaya, N.P.D.; et al. Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 10856–10915.
  23. Orús, R.; Mugel, S.; Lizaso, E. Quantum Computing for Finance: Overview and Prospects. Rev. Phys. 2019, 4, 100028.
  24. O’Gorman, B.; Babbush, R.; Perdomo-Ortiz, A.; Aspuru-Guzik, A.; Smelyanskiy, V. Bayesian Network Structure Learning Using Quantum Annealing. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2015, 224, 163–188.
  25. Houssein, E.H.; Abohashima, Z.; Elhoseny, M.; Mohamed, W.M. Machine Learning in the Quantum Realm: The State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Future Vision. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022, 194, 116512.
  26. Aggarwal, D.; Brennen, G.; Lee, T.; Santha, M.; Tomamichel, M. Quantum Attacks on Bitcoin, and How to Protect against Them. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1710.10377.
  27. Perdomo-Ortiz, A.; Benedetti, M.; Realpe-Gómez, J.; Biswas, R. Opportunities and Challenges for Quantum-Assisted Machine Learning in near-Term Quantum Computers. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2018, 3, 030502.
  28. Khumalo, M.T.; Chieza, H.A.; Prag, K.; Woolway, M. An Investigation of IBM Quantum Computing Device Performance on Combinatorial Optimisation Problems. Neural Comput. Appl. 2022.
  29. Harrow, A.W.; Montanaro, A. Quantum Computational Supremacy. Nature 2017, 549, 203–209.
  30. Braxton, S.N. Competency Frameworks, Alternative Credentials and the Evolving Relationship of Higher Education and Employers in Recognizing Skills and Achievements. IJILT 2023.
  31. Ahmadi, A.; Vogel, B. Knowing but Not Enacting Leadership: Navigating the Leadership Knowing–Doing Gap in Leveraging Leadership Development. AMLE 2023, 22, 507–530.
  32. Do, H.; Budhwar, P.; Shipton, H.; Nguyen, H.-D.; Nguyen, B. Building Organizational Resilience, Innovation through Resource-Based Management Initiatives, Organizational Learning and Environmental Dynamism. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 141, 808–821.
  33. Cruess, S.R.; Cruess, R.L.; Steinert, Y. Supporting the Development of a Professional Identity: General Principles. Med. Teach. 2019, 41, 641–649.
  34. Reese, S. Extended Book Review and Author Interview: The Rise of the Ambidextrous Organization: The Secret Revolution Happening Right under Your Nose. TLO 2021, 28, 554–559.
  35. Saunila, M. Innovation Capability in SMEs: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Innov. Knowl. 2020, 5, 260–265.
  36. Marin, R. Employee Engagement: An Actual Theme, in a Permanent Evolution. JHRMR 2021, 2021, 796417.
  37. Yu, T.; Cannella, A.A. A Comprehensive Review of Multimarket Competition Research. J. Manag. 2013, 39, 76–109.
  38. Bouncken, R.B.; Fredrich, V.; Ritala, P.; Kraus, S. Coopetition in New Product Development Alliances: Advantages and Tensions for Incremental and Radical Innovation. Br. J. Manag. 2018, 29, 391–410.
  39. Perkmann, M.; Walsh, K. University–Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2007, 9, 259–280.
  40. Battistella, C.; De Toni, A.F.; Pessot, E. Open Accelerators for Start-Ups Success: A Case Study. EJIM 2017, 20, 80–111.
  41. Dyer, J.H.; Nobeoka, K. Creating and Managing a High-Performance Knowledge-Sharing Network: The Toyota Case. Strat. Mgmt. J. 2000, 21, 345–367.
  42. Enkel, E.; Gassmann, O. Creative Imitation: Exploring the Case of Cross-industry Innovation. R D Manag. 2010, 40, 256–270.
  43. Long, T.B.; Blok, V. Integrating the Management of Socio-Ethical Factors into Industry Innovation: Towards a Concept of Open Innovation 2.0. IFAM 2018, 21, 463–486.
  44. Tolstykh, T.; Shmeleva, N.; Gamidullaeva, L.; Krasnobaeva, V. The Role of Collaboration in the Development of Industrial Enterprises Integration. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7180.
  45. Doz, Y.L. Strategic Alliances. SSRN J. 2023.
  46. Kohtamäki, M.; Rabetino, R.; Huikkola, T. Learning in Strategic Alliances: Reviewing the Literature Streams and Crafting the Agenda for Future Research. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2023, 110, 68–84.
  47. Ireland, R.D.; Hitt, M.A.; Vaidyanath, D. Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage. J. Manag. 2002, 28, 413–446.
  48. Gulati, R. Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances. Acad. Manag. J. 1995, 38, 85–112.
  49. Willcocks, L.; Smith, G. IT-Enabled Business Process Reengineering: Organizational and Human Resource Dimensions. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 1995, 4, 279–301.
  50. Grant, R.M. Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 11th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022; ISBN 978-1-119-81523-5.
  51. Katila, R.; Ahuja, G. Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction. Acad. Manag. J. 2002, 45, 1183–1194.
  52. MacCormack, A.; Verganti, R.; Iansiti, M. Developing Products on “Internet Time”: The Anatomy of a Flexible Development Process. Manag. Sci. 2001, 47, 133–150.
  53. West, J.; Gallagher, S. Challenges of Open Innovation: The Paradox of Firm Investment in Open-Source Software. RD Manag. 2006, 36, 319–331.
  54. McGrath, R.G. Failing by Design. Harv Bus Rev 2011, 89, 76–83, 137.
  55. Davila, T.; Wouters, M. Managing Budget Emphasis through the Explicit Design of Conditional Budgetary Slack. Account. Organ. Soc. 2005, 30, 587–608.
  56. Edmondson, A.C.; Mcmanus, S.E. Methodological Fit in Management Field Research. AMR 2007, 32, 1246–1264.
  57. Cohen, W.M.; Levinthal, D.A. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 1990, 35, 128.
  58. Cooper, R.G.; Edgett, S.J.; Kleinschmidt, E.J. New Product Portfolio Management: Practices and Performance. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 1992, 16, 333–351.
  59. Chesbrough, H.W. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology; Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2003; ISBN 978-1-57851-837-1.
  60. Teece, D.J. Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strat. Mgmt. J. 2007, 28, 1319–1350.
  61. Nonaka, I.; Toyama, R. The Knowledge-Creating Theory Revisited: Knowledge Creation as a Synthesizing Process. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 2003, 1, 2–10.
More
Information
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : ,
View Times: 528
Revisions: 4 times (View History)
Update Date: 11 Jun 2024
1000/1000
Video Production Service