Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Md Tota Miah
 -- 1190 2024-01-22 10:38:45 |
2 layout
Jessie Wu
 Meta information modification 1190 2024-01-23 02:15:31 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Miah, M.T.; Lakner, Z.; Fekete-Farkas, M. Social Entrepreneurship and Poverty Alleviation for Sustainable Development. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54181 (accessed on 17 November 2024).
Miah MT, Lakner Z, Fekete-Farkas M. Social Entrepreneurship and Poverty Alleviation for Sustainable Development. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54181. Accessed November 17, 2024.
Miah, Md. Tota, Zoltán Lakner, Mária Fekete-Farkas. "Social Entrepreneurship and Poverty Alleviation for Sustainable Development" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54181 (accessed November 17, 2024).
Miah, M.T., Lakner, Z., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2024, January 22). Social Entrepreneurship and Poverty Alleviation for Sustainable Development. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54181
Miah, Md. Tota, et al. "Social Entrepreneurship and Poverty Alleviation for Sustainable Development." Encyclopedia. Web. 22 January, 2024.
Social Entrepreneurship and Poverty Alleviation for Sustainable Development
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/admsci14010016

The increasing social and environmental challenges, particularly poverty, have brought social entrepreneurship, a highly researched domain, to the attention of academicians. It has emerged as a critical issue in the context of economic development and societal well-being.

social entrepreneurship social innovation entrepreneurial ecosystem inclusive growth sustainable social change

1. Introduction

Social entrepreneurship has increasingly become an integral aspect of social innovation and sustainable development, offering a means to tackle challenging social problems (Phillips et al. 2015; Holland et al. 2018). In recent years, it has been a subject of academic exploration, gathering researchers’ attention because of its potential economic prosperity and social benefits (Diochon 2013; Starnawska 2016). Poverty is considered a major challenge for any country to create a more equitable and sustainable future (Tundys et al. 2021; Moyo et al. 2022). Currently, the poverty rate (9.2%) impacts approximately 659 million individuals in the world population. The COVID-19 pandemic, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and the cost-of-living crisis have further exacerbated poverty rates and hindered progress towards the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals of ending poverty by 2030 (Nchasi et al. 2022; Ozili 2022). Particularly, Sub-Saharan Africa faces a daunting challenge, with an estimated 59.33% of its population living in extreme poverty and 24.43% in South Asia, as shown in Table 1. According to Bruton et al. (2013) and Sutter et al. (2019), poverty is a multifaceted issue of resource scarcity, social exclusion, and systemic failures, which is crucial for economic growth. Kroll et al. (2019) found that poverty reduction is statistically linked to favoring the progress of other SDGs. For example, SDG 3 (good health and well-being), 4 (quality education), 5 (gender equality), 6 (clean water and sanitation), and 10 (reduced inequalities). Therefore, in the face of rising global poverty and socio-environmental concerns, social entrepreneurship can play a significant role as a potential driver of social innovation and economic development (Ho and Yoon 2022). It aims to prioritize stakeholders over shareholders to address global concerns within capitalism while operating profitably (Vansandt et al. 2009). Alvord et al. (2004) say that social entrepreneurship specifically targets marginalized individuals and communities, prioritizing poverty alleviation and protecting the environment. Luke and Chu (2013) describe the term as an approach that places a strong focus on creating and implementing socially driven initiatives that bring positive changes to society. However, Azmat (2013) portrays social entrepreneurship as a catalyst for sustainable development in developing countries, challenging the idea of a trade-off between poverty reduction and environmental sustainability. Thus, the concept involves not only addressing social issues but also adapting and responding to the unique contextual influences and challenges present in the environment where these ventures operate (Rivera-Santos et al. 2015).
Table 1. Regional world poverty estimates and changes.
Region Survey Coverage (Percentage)
March 2023		 Number of Poor (Million)
September 2022
$2.15 (2017-ppp)		 Number of Poor (Million)
March 2023
$2.15 (2017-ppp)		 Number of Poor
(Percentage)
East Asia and the Pacific 97.4 24 25 3.79
Europe and Central Asia 87.4 12 11 1.67
Latin America and the Caribbean 86.7 28 28 4.25
Middle East and North Africa 48.3 n/a n/a n/a
Other high-income 82.3 7 7 1.06
South Asia 96.4 156 161 24.43
Sub-Saharan Africa 54.3 389 391 59.33
Eastern and Southern Africa 29.6 n/a n/a n/a
Western and Central Africa 90.5 122 124 18.82
Total (World) 84.6 648 659  
Source: Data extracted from Aguilar et al. (2023).

2. Summary of Social Entrepreneurship Research

Social entrepreneurship has garnered increasing interest from researchers due to its significant social and economic impact. It has become a prominent focus in both academic research and practical application (Rey-Martí et al. 2016). Gaining insights into existing literature, research methodologies, and key findings is crucial for the current research to understand the domain. This section provides an overview of previous studies related to social entrepreneurship, summarizing their key attributes and findings. The findings provide a comprehensive overview of the field’s development and current state. It can be observed that several authors (Hota 2023; Kaushik et al. 2023) employed a bibliometric approach; they differ in their focus, emphasizing the ecosystem, exploring latent themes, and providing a structured review, respectively. Satar et al. (2023) also used bibliometrics but focused on co-authorship and keywords. In contrast, Zhang et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review approach to identify publication trends in tourism and hospitality social entrepreneurship. Phan Tan (2022) employs co-citation and bibliographic coupling analysis, while Costa and Miragaia (2022) concentrate on barriers to female entrepreneurship in the sports industry. Ambad (2022) conducts systematic reviews and meta-analyses to identify antecedents of social entrepreneurial intention, while Dettori and Floris (2021) perform bibliometrics to identify prolific contributors in the technology-related aspect of social entrepreneurship. However, this compilation of research papers serves as a valuable reference point for understanding this research domain. The findings and methodologies presented in these papers offer insights that are highly relevant to the research objectives. In conclusion, the summary not only highlights key research papers in the field of social entrepreneurship but also presents the variety of research methodologies employed and the richness of the findings. This provides a solid foundation for the research to understand current trends and emerging areas in the field.

3. Poverty and Sustainable Development

Poverty and sustainable development have been focal points in academic research and policymaking, particularly in the context of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (Ogwumike and Ozughalu 2016; Guo and Liu 2022). Sustainable development, as defined in the report of Brundtland et al. (1987), is the process of satisfying current needs while safeguarding the capacity of future generations. Griggs et al. (2014) delve deeper into this notion, placing particular emphasis on the interdependence of environmental, social, and economic sustainability. Afterwards, Piwowarski et al. (2022) underscore the prospective character of the approach, which seeks to eradicate poverty while simultaneously promoting economic development, social justice, and environmental preservation. The primary and core objective of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals is the eradication of extreme poverty globally by 2030. This goal carries enormous significance as it strongly impacts the execution of the other goals, including those pertaining to economic and environmental matters (Leal Filho et al. 2021). The concept of poverty is intricate and diverse, comprising aspects from the social, economic, political, and psychological spheres (Sachs 2005). He defines it as an absence of overall well-being that has an impact on the quality of life of those affected. According to Ferrone and Chzhen (2018), poverty is a multifaceted notion that extends beyond a basic deficiency in income, as evidenced by subsistence levels below $1.25 per day. Chzhen et al. (2018) argue that a more comprehensive understanding of poverty is consistent with the sustainable development goal of eradicating poverty in all its forms by 2030. They recognize that poverty encompasses various aspects that impact an individual’s well-being and are not limited to financial constraints. Indicators that encompass the economic and social aspects of households and individuals, such as their financial situation, vulnerability to material deprivation, and availability of essential services, collectively constitute poverty (Palimaka and Karas 2022). Nevertheless, achieving this target is not devoid of obstacles, such as the need for robust political commitment, tranquility, and equitable economic restructuring (Kamruzzaman 2016). Poverty reduction is an imperative component of sustainable development and requires the utmost government attention (Liu et al. 2015). The interrelated nature of the Sustainable Development Goals emphasizes the vital role of poverty alleviation as a key component in attaining the overall goals. Entrepreneurship programs need to focus on the development of creativity and innovation in order to tackle this issue (Obinna and Blessing 2020). However, there is an increasing understanding of the significance of social entrepreneurship in progressing sustainability and instigating social change (Mort and Hume 2009).

References

  1. Phillips, Wendy, Hazel Lee, Abby Ghobadian, Nicholas O’Regan, and Peter James. 2015. Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review. Group and Organization Management 40: 428–61.
  2. Holland, Joseph H., William Hatcher, and V. Brooks Poole. 2018. Social Entrepreneurship in Trujillo, Peru: The Case of Nisolo. Community Development 49: 312–23.
  3. Diochon, Monica. 2013. Social Entrepreneurship and Effectiveness in Poverty Alleviation: A Case Study of a Canadian First Nations Community. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 4: 302–30.
  4. Starnawska, Marzena. 2016. Social Entrepreneurship Research–Challenges, Explanations and Suggestions for the Field Development. Problemy Zarzadzania 14: 13–31.
  5. Tundys, Blanka, Agnieszka Bretyn, and Maciej Urbaniak. 2021. Energy Poverty and Sustainable Economic Development: An Exploration of Correlations and Interdependencies in European Countries. Energies 14: 7640.
  6. Moyo, Clement, Syden Mishi, and Ronney Ncwadi. 2022. Human Capital Development, Poverty and Income Inequality in the Eastern Cape Province. Development Studies Research 9: 36–47.
  7. Nchasi, Goodluck, Carolyn Mwasha, Moshi Moshi Shaban, Rose Rwegasira, Benardine Mallilah, Joshua Chesco, Anastasiia Volkova, and Ashraf Mahmoud. 2022. Ukraine’s Triple Emergency: Food Crisis amid Conflicts and COVID-19 Pandemic. Health Science Reports 5: e862.
  8. Ozili, Peterson K. 2022. Global Economic Consequence of Russian Invasion of Ukraine. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4064770 (accessed on 30 December 2023).
  9. Bruton, Garry D., David J. Ketchen, and R. Duane Ireland. 2013. Entrepreneurship as a Solution to Poverty. Journal of Business Venturing 28: 683–89.
  10. Sutter, Christopher, Garry D. Bruton, and Juanyi Chen. 2019. Entrepreneurship as a Solution to Extreme Poverty: A Review and Future Research Directions. Journal of Business Venturing 34: 197–214.
  11. Kroll, Christian, Anne Warchold, and Prajal Pradhan. 2019. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are We Successful in Turning Trade-Offs into Synergies? Palgrave Communications 5: 140.
  12. Ho, Jae-Yun, and Semee Yoon. 2022. Ambiguous Roles of Intermediaries in Social Entrepreneurship: The Case of Social Innovation System in South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 175: 121324.
  13. Vansandt, Craig V., Mukesh Sud, and Christopher Marme. 2009. Enabling the Original Intent: Catalysts for Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics 90: 419–28.
  14. Alvord, Sarah H., L. David Brown, and Christine W. Letts. 2004. Social Entrepreneurship and Societal Transformation: An Exploratory Study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 40: 260–82.
  15. Luke, Belinda, and Vien Chu. 2013. Social Enterprise versus Social Entrepreneurship: An Examination of the ‘why’ and ‘How’ in Pursuing Social Change. International Small Business Journal 31: 764–84.
  16. Azmat, Fara. 2013. Sustainable Development in Developing Countries: The Role of Social Entrepreneurs. International Journal of Public Administration 36: 293–304.
  17. Rivera-Santos, Miguel, Diane Holt, David Littlewood, and Ans Kolk. 2015. Social Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa. Academy of Management Perspectives 29: 72–91.
  18. Aguilar, R. Andres Castaneda, Carolina Diaz-Bonilla, Tony H. M. J. Fujs, Dean Jolliffe, Aphichoke Kotikula, Christoph Lakner, Gabriel Lara Ibarra, Daniel G. Mahler, Veronica S. Montalva Talledo, Minh C. Nguyen, and et al. 2023. March 2023 Update to the Poverty and Inequality Platform (PIP): What’s New. Global Poverty Monitoring Technical Note, no. 27. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Available online: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099923403272329672/pdf/IDU089370bcb048b9044fd0ab49037249b87aef6.pdf (accessed on 31 December 2023).
  19. Rey-Martí, Andrea, Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, and Daniel Palacios-Marqués. 2016. A Bibliometric Analysis of Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research 69: 1651–55.
  20. Hota, Pradeep Kumar. 2023. Tracing the Intellectual Evolution of Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Advances, Current Trends, and Future Directions. Journal of Business Ethics 182: 637–59.
  21. Kaushik, Vineet, Shobha Tewari, Sreevas Sahasranamam, and Pradeep Kumar Hota. 2023. Towards a Precise Understanding of Social Entrepreneurship: An Integrated Bibliometric–Machine Learning Based Review and Research Agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 191: 122516.
  22. Satar, Mir Shahid, Deepanshi Aggarwal, Rohit Bansal, and Ghadah Alarifi. 2023. Mapping the Knowledge Structure and Unveiling the Research Trends in Social Entrepreneurship and Inclusive Development: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 15: 5626.
  23. Zhang, Yan, Hong Xu, and Hongyan Yang. 2023. An Integrated Path Framework of Tourism and Hospitality Social Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
  24. Phan Tan, Luc. 2022. Bibliometrics of Social Entrepreneurship Research: Co-citation and Bibliographic Coupling Analyses. Cogent Business & Management 9: 2124594.
  25. Costa, Carla, and Dina Alexandra Marques Miragaia. 2022. A Systematic Review of Women’s Entrepreneurship in the Sports Industry: Has Anything Changed? Gender in Management 37: 988–1008.
  26. Ambad, Sylvia Nabila Azwa. 2022. A Systematic Literature Review on Social Entrepreneurial Intention: Citation, Thematic Analyses and Future Research Directions. Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility 18: 93–124.
  27. Dettori, Angela, and Michela Floris. 2021. Technology in Social Entrepreneurship Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis (1990–2019). International Journal of Business and Management 16: 41.
  28. Ogwumike, Fidelis O., and Uche M. Ozughalu. 2016. Analysis of Energy Poverty and Its Implications for Sustainable Development in Nigeria. Environment and Development Economics 21: 273–90.
  29. Guo, Yuanzhi, and Yansui Liu. 2022. Sustainable Poverty Alleviation and Green Development in China’s Underdeveloped Areas. Journal of Geographical Sciences 32: 23–43.
  30. Brundtland, Gro Harlem, Mansour Khalid, Susanna Agnelli, Saleh A. Al-Athel, Bernard Chidzero, Lamine Mohammed Fadika, Volker Hauff, Istvan Lang, Shijun Ma, and Margarita Morino de Botero. 1987. Our Common Future; by World Commission on Environment and Development. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf (accessed on 30 December 2023).
  31. Griggs, David, Mark Stafford Smith, Johan Rockström, Marcus C. Öhman, Owen Gaffney, Gisbert Glaser, Norichika Kanie, Ian Noble, Will Steffen, and Priya Shyamsundar. 2014. An Integrated Framework for Sustainable Development Goals. Ecology and Society 19: 1–24. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26269703 (accessed on 30 December 2023).
  32. Piwowarski, Juliusz, Larysa Yankovska, Bohdan-Petro Koshovyi, Ira Von-Nagy, and Andrii Yevstakhevych. 2022. Empowering Theory of Poverty Reduction for Sustainable Development: Does the Welfare of Descendants Matter? Problemy Ekorozwoju 17: 52–63.
  33. Leal Filho, Walter, Violeta Orlovic Lovren, Markus Will, Amanda Lange Salvia, and Fernanda Frankenberger. 2021. Poverty: A Central Barrier to the Implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Science & Policy 125: 96–104.
  34. Sachs, Jeffrey D. 2005. Challenges of Sustainable Development under Globalisation. International Journal of Development Issues 4: 1–20.
  35. Ferrone, Lucia, and Yekaterina Chzhen. 2018. How to Reach the Sustainable Development Goal 1.2? Simulating Different Strategies to Reduce Multidimensional Child Poverty in Two Middle-Income Countries. Child Indicators Research 11: 711–28.
  36. Chzhen, Yekaterina, Zlata Bruckauf, and Emilia Toczydlowska. 2018. Monitoring Progress towards Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Child Poverty in the European Union. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 26: 129–50.
  37. Palimaka, Karolina, and Gabriela Karas. 2022. ’No Poverty’-Sustainable Development Goals in The Light of Polish Statistics and Social Policy Activities. Financial Internet Quarterly 18: 51–67.
  38. Kamruzzaman, Palash. 2016. A Critical Note on Poverty Eradication Target of Sustainable Development Goals. European Journal of Sustainable Development 5: 87–110.
  39. Liu, Qian-Qian, Man Yu, and Xiao-Lin Wang. 2015. Poverty Reduction within the Framework of SDGs and Post-2015 Development Agenda. Advances in Climate Change Research 6: 67–73.
  40. Obinna, Celestine, and N. Nwaiwu Blessing. 2020. Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development. Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development 5: 126–29. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234695104.pdf (accessed on 30 December 2023).
  41. Mort, Gillian Sullivan, and Margee Hume. 2009. Special Issue: Sustainability, Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change. Australasian Marketing Journal 17: 189–91.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Management
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Md. Tota Miah
,
Zoltán Lakner
,
Mária Fekete-Farkas
View Times: 208
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 23 Jan 2024
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback