Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Avneesh Kumar
 -- 3337 2024-01-22 08:36:12 |
2 Reference format revised.
Lindsay Dong
 Meta information modification 3337 2024-01-23 01:27:49 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Kumar, A.; Chang, D.W. Optimized Polymeric Membranes for Water Treatment. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54170 (accessed on 27 April 2024).
Kumar A, Chang DW. Optimized Polymeric Membranes for Water Treatment. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54170. Accessed April 27, 2024.
Kumar, Avneesh, Dong Wook Chang. "Optimized Polymeric Membranes for Water Treatment" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54170 (accessed April 27, 2024).
Kumar, A., & Chang, D.W. (2024, January 22). Optimized Polymeric Membranes for Water Treatment. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/54170
Kumar, Avneesh and Dong Wook Chang. "Optimized Polymeric Membranes for Water Treatment." Encyclopedia. Web. 22 January, 2024.
Optimized Polymeric Membranes for Water Treatment
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/polym16020271

Conventional polymers, endowed with specific functionalities, are extensively utilized for filtering and extracting a diverse set of chemicals, notably metals, from solutions. The main structure of a polymer is an integral part for designing an efficient separating system. However, its chemical functionality further contributes to the selectivity, fabrication process, and resulting product morphology. One example would be a membrane that can be employed to selectively remove a targeted metal ion or chemical from a solution, leaving behind the useful components of the solution. Such membranes or products are highly sought after for purifying polluted water contaminated with toxic and heavy metals. An efficient water-purifying membrane must fulfill several requirements, including a specific morphology attained by the material with a specific chemical functionality and facile fabrication for integration into a purifying module Therefore, the selection of an appropriate polymer and its functionalization become crucial and determining steps.

supramolecular assemblies functional polymers membranes water purification pollutants in water

1. Introduction

Human activities and interventions in ecosystems have led to numerous global challenges [1][2]. Among these, the availability of freshwater for drinking stands out as a significant concern. Scarcity of potable water in many regions worldwide presents a formidable challenge for sustaining life on this planet [3]. Large quantities of chemicals from industrial plants and households are dumped into rivers and other natural water reservoirs [4]. These chemicals or pollutants mainly comprise heavy metal ions, dyes, and other organic contaminants. They accumulate in water bodies, posing risks to living organisms and causing not only water pollution but also potentially life-threatening illnesses, such as cancer [5][6][7][8]. Consequently, there is an urgent need for efficient methods to remove or decompose these pollutants, prompting extensive research in this area. Most of these techniques involve incorporating functional materials, such as polymers or hybrid composites, within the performing device [9][10][11][12]. While bulk materials have also been utilized for this purpose, there has been a growing emphasis on focusing on nanoscale functional materials. This is because nanomaterials can provide several benefits ranging from control over the morphology to selectivity and fabrication [13][14][15][16]. Among these nanomaterials, polymers are of particular interest as they offer multiple features (as mentioned above) suitable for similar applications. In polymers, the introduction of a specific chemical functional group (polar or nonpolar) before or post synthesis can help determine the final morphology and selectivity for a particular pollutant and its removal during the water treatment process [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The chemical and physical properties of a polymer, characterized by a well-designed backbone and desired functional groups, play a considerable role in the fabrication of water purification devices or units [25][26][27]. Functional polymers employed in water treatment processes are modified with polar or ionic groups, such as hydroxyl, carboxylic, amine, phosphonic, and sulfonic groups, among others, to remove a specific pollutant (for example, a metal) [28][29][30][31]. Therefore, when designing functional polymers, the removal pathway in the water treatment process must be considered. To further understand the holistic approach applied to functional polymers concerning their morphology, selectivity, and role in the water treatment processes, it is essential to summarize and highlight all the recent research efforts aimed at developing efficient functional polymers dedicated to pollutant removal.
A well-controlled and directed morphology further dictates the formation of nanopores within the membrane. The size and shape of these nanopores are crucial for the pathway of water flux. Figure 1 provides a detailed schematic overview showcasing a few polymers, the membrane casting in a device, and the resultant membrane morphology. Common polymers, including polyacrylonitrile (PAN), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyethersulfone (PES), polysulfone (PSF), poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK), poly(amide) (PA), polyurethane (PU), and poly(styrene), along with their derivatives, such as copolymers, have been extensively utilized for membrane filtration [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Crucial considerations when casting or processing membranes in a device involves evaluating the chemical structure, morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of these polymers [41][42][44][45]. These parameters significantly impact the membrane’s performance in the device. Membranes produced from these synthetic polymers are categorized into the following groups: (1) isotropic or symmetric and (2) anisotropic or asymmetric. This categorization depends on factors like nonporosity, as well as the presence of charged or uncharged polymeric chains (as fabricated through solvent-based or other techniques) [47][48].
Polymers 16 00271 g002
Figure 1. (A) A water filter device composed of different components, such as a separating layer, substrate, and a polymeric membrane cast from a relevant functional polymer; (B) chemical structures of a few polymers, including their two-dimensional (2D) materials counterparts, highlighting active functional groups crucial for selectivity and filtration, as well as a specific nanostructure suitable for an effective membrane and its processability; and (C) various morphologies of polymeric membranes showcasing diverse features, including nanopores, three-dimensional (3D) interconnected channels and homogenous distribution of uniform nanopores, and structure–properties correlation.
In isotropic or symmetric membranes, the porosity and pore size regulate the filtration process, that is, the microfiltration (MF) of molecules or particles with varying sizes or dimensions. Alternatively, nonporous yet dense isotropic membranes have undergone testing for their performance. These membranes allow water to pass through while retaining other “species” or pollutants depending on their solubility and diffusivity. This phenomenon is observed in gas separation, pervaporation, and reverse osmosis (RO) processes. In isotropically charged membranes, such as those used in electrodialysis, the separation process occurs via ionic interactions (regardless of porosity) between the polymeric network’s ionic groups in the membrane and the positively/negatively charged molecules of the impurities [49]. Conversely, anisotropic (asymmetric) membranes exhibit structural or chemical heterogeneity in their networks and are classified into two subgroups: (i) Loeb and Sourirajan membranes and (ii) Thin-film composite (TFC) membranes [50][51][52][53]. Loeb and Sourirajan membranes are fabricated using polymer-forming layers with indistinguishable pore sizes and porosities. In contrast, TFC membranes are prepared employing two different polymers, creating a dense surface layer responsible for separation and a thick, porous layer for providing mechanical support [50][51][52][53]. Several techniques are employed for fabricating polymer-based membranes, serving both research and industrial purposes. Notable methods include interfacial polymerization (IP), sputtering, solution casting, extruding, melt pressing, phase inversion, and electrospinning, all commonly applied for producing polymeric membranes [54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. Figure 2 illustrates a graphical depiction of some of these fabrication techniques.
Polymers 16 00271 g003
Figure 2. Various techniques for fabricating membranes from polymeric precursors: (A) casting a membrane from a polymeric solution on a substrate and evaporating the solvent either via precipitation in a nonsolvent (DI-water) or under controlled heat; (B) membrane formation via IP of a monomer at the interface of organic–aqueous phase, resulting in nanocapsules with aligned polymer chains on a porous substrate; (C) solvent-free extrusion of a molten polymer, generating aligned fibers in a membrane on a substrate; and (D) formation of polymeric fibers and a membrane via electrospinning, achieved by injecting a viscous polymeric solution through needles under electrodynamics or high DC voltage.

2. Membranes Based on PA and Its Derivatives

In 1930, at DuPont Wallace, Carothers synthesized a PA, commonly known as nylon [61]. As engineering plastics, PAs are usually synthesized via step-growth polymerization and exhibit high durability and excellent thermal, barrier, and mechanical strengths owing to their rigid backbone. They are used in textiles, the automotive industry, carpets, kitchen utensils, and sportswear.
Figure 3 illustrates the typical structure of an aromatic PA, emphasizing its high-performance attributes and the presence of dense layers in a film or membrane.
Polymers 16 00271 g004
Figure 3. Chemical structure of a representative aromatic PA, categorized as a high-performance or engineering plastic due to its high durability and excellent thermal and mechanical properties. The layers of PA chains in a film are dense and inert to further modifications, necessitating advanced and optimized methodologies for the same.
Synthetic aromatic PAs are preferred over their aliphatic counterparts because the latter exhibits increased moisture susceptibility, resulting in mechanical weakness and dimensional deformities. Notably, aromatic PAs such as polyphthalamides (PPAs) are processable in the molten state and have accordingly attracted considerable commercial attention. Aromatic PAs have found significant utility exploited as membrane materials owing to their superior hydrolytic and permselective properties. Despite PAs being the gold standard in both academic and industrial efforts for membrane preparation, achieving precise tuning of the PA layer remains a challenging task (Figure 3).
Recently, a remarkable approach for fabricating asymmetric PA films with well-ordered nanopores and dense layers was reported. This method involves the successive utilization of a PA-based dendrimer and IP of two different monomers to create an efficient double-layered membrane for NF [62]. Figure 4 illustrates a schematic representation of this innovative approach. In the study, PA dendrimers of different generations were employed to create the lower porous layer of a membrane. Since PA dendrimers are hyperbranched and possess a nearly spherical structure, they display peculiar features such as well-defined functional periphery and uniform intramolecular voids or cavities. For this purpose, PA dendrimers with 32-amine terminal groups at the periphery were synthesized and subsequently treated in a salt solution (pH = 1) on the surface of a PSF support. This treatment facilitated their coupling with each other via a diazotization-coupling reaction involving a sodium nitrite solution, culminating in a covalent assembly (Figure 4).
Polymers 16 00271 g005
Figure 4. Strategy for creating a double-layered membrane comprising the following: (a) hyper-branched–amine-terminated dendrimer which, upon further coupling via diazotization, forms (b) a porous layer on a support, followed by (c) IP of two different monomers, namely PIP and TMC, conducted on the porous layer. This process aims to produce a dense and thin asymmetric successive layer of PA with an optimized transport pathway and ordered nanovoids. Reprinted with permission from Nature Comm. [62], Copyright 2020 Nature Portfolio. The article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Morphological investigations of these double-layered membranes using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) clearly delineated two different layers corresponding to the covalent assembly of dendrimers and asymmetric PAs produced after IP. Figure 5 displays the TEM micrographs showcasing the single-layer PA nanofilms, revealing PA aggregations throughout. However, following the IP process, the structural features of the membrane transformed significantly, characterized by the appearance of uniform nanovoids. At high resolution, an array of interconnected, ordered nanovoids (width of 70–120 nm) was also observed. Further analysis with atomic force microscopy (AFM) and X-ray techniques confirmed the formation of an asymmetric PA membrane, comprising a porous layer of spherical dendrimers and a dense PA layer. Such features are targeted to reduce the transmembrane resistance of water and increase the permeation flux. With regard to the separation performance of these membranes, studies have demonstrated a 3.7- to 4.3-fold higher water flux for various salt solutions (2000 ppm) compared to traditional PA membranes. To further examine the superiority of these double-layered membranes, their permeability and selectivity were tested and compared with the data estimated for different types of PA membranes. These included commercial PA membranes, crumpled PA membranes (IP with crumpled structures), PA membranes prepared using interlayers, traditional IP membranes, and mixed-matrix PA membranes (Figure 5).
Polymers 16 00271 g006
Figure 5. Morphological features of an asymmetric PA membrane: (a) TEM micrographs without the dendrimer; (b) with the covalent assemblies of dendrimer; (c,d) permeation and selectivity of an asymmetric membrane produced via IP on dendrimer and other available membranes reported in the literature, including commercial ones; and (e) schematic representation illustrating the transportation of water (salt water) across the membrane without and with a dendrimer porous layer, as fabricated via diazotization prior to IP. Reprinted with permission from Nature Comm. [62], Copyright 2020 Nature Portfolio. The article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

3. Membrane Based on Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) and Its Derivatives

Following the extensive utilization of PAs, PVDF (–(CH2CF2)n–) has emerged as another favored polymer for fabricating membranes due to its impressive mechanical strength, chemical resistance, and thermal stability [63]. Its solubility in various common solvents and easy processability allow the manufacture of flat sheets, hollow fibers, or tubular membranes suitable for MF or UF.
Further progress towards the development of PVDF membranes has explored more innovative and unique approaches, including the utilization of thermosalient (TS) crystal monomers such as 1,2,4,5-tetrabromobenzene (TBB). This compound is recognized as an energy-efficient–dynamic crystalline material due to its phase transition occurring above room temperature [64][65]. These dynamic functional crystals can activate the membrane via mechanical or heat responses, thus increasing the mass transfer. To fabricate these smart, responsive membranes, a layer of PVDF was integrated with a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel. The fabrication process involves incorporating dynamic crystals of TBB into an aqueous solution containing PVA and glutaraldehyde (GA), resulting in a suspension. Treatment of this suspension with hydrochloric acid or HCl leads to its casting on the porous surface of the PVDF film. Subsequent polymerization between TBB and GA was performed to obtain a smart PVDF–PVA membrane with dispersed TBB crystals. Experiments conducted to evaluate the transmembrane flux of these membranes showcase improved and superior performance compared with the undoped PVDF–PVA membrane. Even after the fifth operational cycle, the average flux of TBB-doped membranes remains consistently higher, surpassing 160%. Notably, the phase transition of TBB crystals likely impacts the transport properties upon heating and cooling. Applications of these membranes include distillation and antifouling. Additionally, with regard to hybrid PVDF membranes, another example involves the fabrication of polyaniline (PANI) layers within a PVDF matrix to optimize the hydrophilicity, porosity, antifouling properties, solvent content, and water flux. 
In the study, a phase-inversion method is employed to fabricate PVDF membranes with various PANI concentrations. The addition of PANI (PANI (1–4 wt.%) increases the hydrophilicity of the resulting membrane with reduced pore size, as evidenced by the contact angle and SEM measurements. The operational experimental results demonstrate an enhancement in water flux from 28 to 47 L m−2 h, signifying increased hydrophilicity upon addition of PANI to PVDF. Furthermore, the performance tests exhibit high rejection of dye molecules (allura red and methyl orange).

4. Membrane Based on Poly (PEEK) and Its Derivatives

PEEK, a high-performance polymer, exhibits high performance, excellent mechanical properties, chemical resistance, thermal stability, and self-lubrication properties (Figure 6) [66][67][68]. Owing to its processability in various solvents, it has also been used in multiple sectors, spanning aerospace, chemical industry, biomedicine, and membrane technology [67][68][69][70]. By introducing carbon fibers, carbon nanotubes, and various nanoparticles into its matrix, the properties of PEEK can be further tailored, with the resulting composites finding applications in membrane production (Figure 12).
Polymers 16 00271 g012
Figure 6. Typical PEEK polymer with its functionalized and composite derivatives that are used for membrane fabrication.
In a recent innovative approach, a PEEK hollow fiber membrane (PHFM) was initially fabricated from the blend of PEEK and PEI via melt spinning [71]. Next, the ketone groups located on the surface of the hollow fibrous membrane were reduced to alcohol functionalities to anchor an active unit or initiator to create hydrophilic brushes via a controlled polymerization reaction, namely, atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The analysis revealed that these hollow fibrous membranes were decorated with a hydrophilic layer of 2-hydroxylethyl acrylate (HEA) chains that directly affected the permeability, separation, and antifouling performance of the membranes [71].
Performance tests for these hollow PEEK membranes indicate a high water flux and BSA rejection ratio. The hydrophilic channels resulting from the HEA chains increase the permeability of the membrane. Moreover, the membrane exhibited enhanced antifouling properties attributed to intermolecular repulsion between the fouling agent and the membrane. These modified PEEK base membranes, fabricated via melt spinning followed by covalent functionalization of the surface, are considered promising candidates for wastewater separation and purification.

5. Membranes Based on Porous Organic Polymers and Covalent or Metal Organic Frameworks (COFs/MOFs)

A new category of hybrid porous materials that combine advantages of both organic polymers and crystalline MOFs have emerged and been utilized for fabricating membranes with greater efficiency for water treatment. These hybrids have garnered attention due to their well-defined supramolecular architectures derived from fundamental building blocks, such as metal clusters and organic ligands. These materials are being explored for the manufacture of membranes designed for water treatment. In these hybrids of polymers and MOFs, a suitable organic ligand is coordinated with a specific metallic center, producing coordinated supramolecular assemblies with long-range order (Figure 7a). These molecular assemblies can be extended into two or three dimensions depending on their linkages [72].
Polymers 16 00271 g015
Figure 7. Coordinated and porous organic polymers categorized as (a) MOFs and (b) COFs, respectively, exhibiting common features such as stable porosity, crystallinity, high order, and controlled geometry.
The key features of MOFs or coordinated macromolecules include ordered open channels, large porosities, predictable pore sizes, and adjustable chemical environments, which offer great opportunities for separation applications. There is a subcategory of polymers that, while lacking metal centers, consist of covalently linked 2D scaffolds with the desired geometries and multiple reactive sites. Correspondingly, it has also attracted considerable attention [73]. These covalently linked 2D scaffolds are known as COFs or porous organic polymers, offering a molecular platform for tailor-made functional materials for membrane development (Figure 7b).
The MOF–PE membranes fabricated via the TIPS–HoP procedure are highly flexible with micron-sized channels, wherein the MOF particles were linked via ultra-high-molecular-weight PE. This renders them as highly efficient separation membranes possessing both high selectivity and high flux. In the study, several MOFs were used to manufacture roll-to-roll membranes to examine their individual selectivities and permeations for different molecules such as dyes, racemates, and proteins in water. The permeance tests of these membranes have indicated only 10% decline after 5 h of operation with an outstanding antifouling effect. The pollutants collected on the membrane surface were eliminated, and the performance of the membrane was further retained. The high and consistent water fluxes of these membranes with significant rejection make them suitable for water treatment and antifouling sustainable agents [74].
With the emergence of new functional nanomaterials, further expansion of the above membranes has led to utilization of COFs. They are porous organic polymers which, owing to their robust stability and ordered network of nanochannels, offer superior selectivity and permeation [53][75]. Considering these unique properties, a next-generation membrane was fabricated via IP, wherein an oil–water–oil three-phase system was used as a method for preparing the COF nanosheets. These sheets were subsequently processed as a membrane via the filtration assembly method [76]. In the top organic phase, the diamine monomers with three kinds of acid groups, including the 2,5-diaminophenylphosphonic acid group (Pa–PO3H2), the 2,5-diaminobenzenesulfonic acid group (Pa–SO3H), and the 2,5-diaminobenzoic acid group (Pa–CO2H) were dissolved. Conversely, in the bottom organic phase, an aldehyde-based monomer (1,3,5-triformylphloroglucinol, Tp) was added, with the middle phase being pure water or an acidic or basic solution.

6. Conclusions

Drinking water scarcity has become a serious threat to human civilization worldwide. The influx of large-scale pollutants, such as organic dyes, detergents, toxic metals, and even byproducts of fertilizers (after their degradation), as well as next-generation nanoparticles or quantum dots, have adversely affected groundwater and rivers. Polluted water not only increases the risk for the extinction of numerous animal species, but also reduces drinking water availability. To treat polluted water or purify it to eliminate toxic and biohazardous elements, an operational filter device with an integrated membrane is required, which can work at a minimum energy cost (with high efficiency). As a membrane material, a number of well-known polymers such as PAN, PVDF, PES, PSF, PEEK, PA, PU, and poly(styrene) have been fabricated by following various methods and their improvised versions. These methods include IP, sputtering, solution casting, extrusion, melt pressing, phase inversion, and electrospinning. More advanced fabrication processes, such as mixed self-assembly followed by vacuum-induced self-assembly, have also been successfully attempted. With a focus on novel chemistry and controlled properties, such as pore size and interlocked networks, the latest materials, graphene, MOFs, and COFs, have been considered as alternatives to polymers owing to their supramolecular architectures, defects, and robustness. The manipulation of defects within these functional frameworks and the fabrication of membranes have shown promising outcomes. With regard to water flux and rejection of pollutants or salts, membranes based on the above frameworks have displayed superior performance.

References

  1. He, C.; Liu, Z.; Wu, J.; Pan, X.; Fang, Z.; Li, J.; Bryan, B.A. Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4667.
  2. Flörke, M.; Schneider, C.; McDonald, R.I. Water competition between cities and agriculture driven by climate change and urban growth. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 51–58.
  3. Vörösmarty, C.J.; Green, P.; Salisbury, J.; Lammers, R.B. Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 2000, 289, 284–288.
  4. Kataoka, T.; Nihei, Y.; Kudou, K.; Hinata, K. Assessment of the sources and inflow processes of microplastics in the river environments of Japan. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 244, 958–965.
  5. Zinabu, E.; Kelderman, P.; van der Kwast, J.; Irvine, K. Impacts and Policy Implications of Metals Effluent Discharge into Rivers within Industrial Zones: A Sub-Saharan Perspective from Ethiopia. Environ. Manag. 2018, 61, 700–715.
  6. Tkaczyk, A.; Mitrowska, K.; Posyniak, A. Synthetic organic dyes as contaminants of the aquatic environment and their implications for ecosystems: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 717, 137222.
  7. Zhitcovich, A. Chromium in Drinking Water: Sources, Metabolism, and Cancer Risks. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2011, 24, 1617–1629.
  8. Skidmore, M.E.; Sims, K.M.; Gibbs, H.K. Agricultural intensification and childhood cancer in Brazil. PNAS 2013, 120, e2306003120.
  9. Wang, M.; Abad, D.; Kickhoefer, V.A.; Rome, L.H.; Mahendra, S. Vault Nanoparticles Packaged with Enzymes as an Efficient Pollutant Biodegradation Technology. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 10931–10940.
  10. Dong, C.; Wang, Z.; Yang, C.; Li, X. Dual-functional single-atomic Mo/Fe clusters–decorated C3N5 via three electron-pathway in oxygen reduction reaction for tandemly removing contaminants from water. PNAS 2023, 120, e2305883120.
  11. Wu, J.; Cao, M.; Tong, D.; Finkelstein, Z.; Hoek, E.M.V. A critical review of point-of-use drinking water treatment in the United States. NPJ Clean Water 2021, 4, 40.
  12. Lewis, S.R.; Datta, S.; Gui, M.; Bhattacharya, D. Reactive nanostructured membranes for water purification. PNAS 2011, 108, 8577–8582.
  13. Liu, Z.; Ma, Z.; Qian, B.; Chan, A.Y.H.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Xin, J.H. A Facile and Scalable Method of Fabrication of Large-Area Ultrathin Graphene Oxide Nanofiltration Membrane. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 15294–15305.
  14. Sarkar, A.K.; Bediako, J.K.; Choi, J.W.; Yun, Y.S. Functionalized magnetic biopolymeric graphene oxide with outstanding performance in water purification. NPG Asia Mater. 2019, 11, 4.
  15. Abbo, H.S.; Gupta, K.C.; Khaligh, N.G.; Titinchi, S.J.J. Carbon Nanomaterials for Wastewater Treatment. ChemBioEng 2021, 8, 463–489.
  16. Adeleye, A.S.; Conway, J.R.; Garner, K.; Huang, Y.; Su, Y.; Keller, A.A. Engineered nanomaterials for water treatment and remediation: Costs, benefits, and applicability. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 286, 640–662.
  17. Andersson, J.; Castello, G.F.D.; Bilotto, P.; Hook, F.; Valtiner, M.; Dahlin, A. Control of Polymer Brush Morphology, Rheology, and Protein Repulsion by Hydrogen Bond Complexation. Langmuir 2021, 37, 4943–4952.
  18. Hurst, P.J.; Graham, A.A.; Patterson, J.P. Gaining Structural Control by Modification of Polymerization Rate in Ring-Opening Polymerization-Induced Crystallization-Driven Self-Assembly. ACS Polym. Au 2022, 2, 501–509.
  19. Huo, N.; Ye, S.; Ouderkirk, A.J.; Tenhaeff, W.E. Porous Polymer Films with Tunable Pore Size and Morphology by Vapor Deposition. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4, 7300–7310.
  20. Nitti, A.; Carfora, R.; Assanelli, G.; Notari, M.; Pasini, D. Single-Chain Polymer Nanoparticles for Addressing Morphologies and Functions at the Nanoscale: A Review. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 13985–13997.
  21. Umermura, A.; Diring, S.; Furukawa, S.; Uehara, H.; Tsuruoka, T.; Kitagawa, S. Morphology Design of Porous Coordination Polymer Crystals by Coordination Modulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15506–15513.
  22. Malile, B.; Chen, J.I.L. Morphology-Based Plasmonic Nanoparticle Sensors: Controlling Etching Kinetics with Target-Responsive Permeability Gate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16042–16045.
  23. Li, C.P.; Zhou, H.; Chen, J.; Wang, J.J.; Du, M.; Zhou, W. A Highly Efficient Coordination Polymer for Selective Trapping and Sensing of Perrhenate/Pertechnetate. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 15246–15254.
  24. Zhu, Y.; Gui, L.; Wang, R.; Wang, Y.; Fang, W.; Elimelech, M.; Lin, S.; Jin, J. Regulation of molecular transport in polymer membranes with voltage-controlled pore size at the angstrom scale. Nat. Comm. 2023, 14, 2373.
  25. Abe, M.; Kametani, Y.; Uemura, T. Fabrication of Double-Stranded Vinyl Polymers Mediated by Coordination Nanochannels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 2448–2454.
  26. Mardle, P.; Chen, B.; Holdcroft, S. Opportunities of Ionomer Development for Anion-Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis. ACS Energy Lett. 2023, 8, 3330–3342.
  27. Getachew, B.A.; Kim, S.R.; Kim, J.H. Self-Healing Hydrogel Pore-Filled Water Filtration Membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 905–913.
  28. Ma, H.; Burger, C.; Hsiao, B.S.; Chu, B. Highly Permeable Polymer Membranes Containing Directed Channels for Water Purification. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1, 723–726.
  29. Sun, Q.; Aguila, B.; Song, Y.; Ma, S. Tailored Porous Organic Polymers for Task-Specific Water Purification. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 812–821.
  30. Luo, H.; Chang, K.; Bahati, K.; Geise, G.M. Engineering Selective Desalination Membranes via Molecular Control of Polymer Functional Groups. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 462–466.
  31. Benkhaled, B.T.; Montheli, T.; Lapinte, V.; Monge, S. Hydrosoluble phosphonic acid functionalized poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) chelating polymers for the sorption of metallic cations. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 58, 2875–2886.
  32. Ahn, H.; Kim, Y.M.; Yang, H.S.; Yeo, S.Y.; Yu, W.R.; Lee, B.S. Moisturized Polyacrylonitrile Copolymer for Stronger Precursor Fibers. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2021, 3, 6285–6293.
  33. Yu, S.; Guerrero, J.M.; Tai, Y.; Yang, S.; Choi, Y.Y.; Nam, J.; Myung, N.V. Maximizing Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber Piezoelectric Properties through the Optimization of Electrospinning and Post-thermal Treatment Processes. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4, 635–644.
  34. Facure, M.H.M.; Mercante, L.A.; Correa, D.S. Polyacrylonitrile/Reduced Graphene Oxide Free-Standing Nanofibrous Membranes for Detecting Endocrine Disruptors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 6376–6384.
  35. Falireas, P.G.; Ladmiral, V.; Debuigne, A.; Detrembleur, C.; Poli, R.; Ameduri, B. Straightforward Synthesis of Well-Defined Poly(vinylidene fluoride) and Its Block Copolymers by Cobalt-Mediated Radical Polymerization. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 1266–1276.
  36. Meringolo, C.; Mastropietro, T.F.; Poerio, T.; Fontananova, E.; De Filpo, G.; Curcio, E.; Di Profio, G. Tailoring PVDF Membranes Surface Topography and Hydrophobicity by a Sustainable Two-Steps Phase Separation Process. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 10069–10077.
  37. Sadare, O.O.; Daramola, M.O. Blended Polysulfone/Polyethersulfone (PSF/PES) Membrane with Enhanced Antifouling Property for Separation of Succinate from Organic Acids from Fermentation Broth. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 13068–13083.
  38. Bernstein, R.; Anton, E.; Ulbricht, M. UV-Photo Graft Functionalization of Polyethersulfone Membrane with Strong Polyelectrolyte Hydrogel and Its Application for Nanofiltration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 3438–3446.
  39. Ben-Haida, A.; Colquhoun, H.M.; Hodge, P.; Williams, D.J. Synthesis of a Catechol-Based Poly(ether ether ketone) (“o-PEEK”) by Classical Step-Growth Polymerization and by Entropically Driven Ring-Opening Polymerization of Macrocyclic Oligomers. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 6467–6472.
  40. Anderson, L.J.; Yuan, X.; Fahs, G.B.; Moore, R.B. Blocky Ionomers via Sulfonation of Poly(ether ether ketone) in the Semicrystalline Gel State. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 6226–6237.
  41. Mulhearn, W.D.; Stafford, C.M. Highly Permeable Reverse Osmosis Membranes via Molecular Layer-by-Layer Deposition of Trimesoyl Chloride and 3,5-Diaminobenzoic Acid. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2021, 3, 116–121.
  42. Zhou, W.; Zhang, X.; Gong, X.; Ding, M.; Yu, J.; Zhang, S.; Ding, B. Environmentally Friendly Polyamide Nanofiber Membranes with Interconnective Amphiphobic Channels for Seawater Desalination. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 35287–35296.
  43. Phillips, S.J.; Ginder, N.C.; Lear, B.J. Rapid Photothermal Synthesis of Polyurethane from Blocked Isocyanates. Macromolecules 2022, 55, 7232–7239.
  44. Alberti, S.; Dodero, A.; Sartori, E.; Vicini, S.; Ferrati, M.; Castelleno, M. Composite Water-Borne Polyurethane Nanofibrous Electrospun Membranes with Photocatalytic Properties. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2021, 3, 6157–6166.
  45. Sato, K.; Kajita, T.; Noro, A. Synthesis of a Cross-Linked Polymer Electrolyte Membrane with an Ultra-High Density of Sulfonic Acid Groups. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2023, 5, 3480–3488.
  46. Zhang, Y.; Almodovar-Arbelo, N.E.; Weidman, J.L.; S-Corti, D.; Boudoris, B.W.; Phillip, W.A. Fit-for-purpose block polymer membranes molecularly engineered for water treatment. NPJ Clean Water 2018, 1, 2.
  47. Lu, T.D.; Wang, Q.; Gu, S.S.; Sun, S.P. Beyond Symmetry: Exploring Asymmetric Electrospun Nanofiber Membranes for Liquid Separation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023. early on-line view 2310218.
  48. Bachler, S.; Ort, M.; Kramer, S.D.; Dittrich, P.S. Permeation Studies across Symmetric and Asymmetric Membranes in Microdroplet Arrays. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 5137–5144.
  49. White, N.; Misovich, M.; Yaroschuk, A.; Bruening, M.L. Coating of Nafion Membranes with Polyelectrolyte Multilayers to Achieve High Monovalent/Divalent Cation Electrodialysis Selectivities. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 6620–6628.
  50. Wang, K.Y.; Ong, R.C.; Chung, T.S. Double-Skinned Forward Osmosis Membranes for Reducing Internal Concentration Polarization within the Porous Sublayer. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 4824–4831.
  51. Le, N.L.; Nunes, S.P. Materials and membrane technologies for water and energy sustainability. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2016, 7, 1–28.
  52. Zhu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Tan, G.; Qi, J.; Zhou, Y.; Li, J. Interlayered Interface of a Thin Film Composite Janus Membrane for Sieving Volatile Substances in Membrane Distillation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 7612–7623.
  53. Koros, W.J.; Zhang, C. Materials for Next-Generation Molecularly Selective Synthetic Membranes. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 289–297.
  54. Seo, M.; Moll, D.; Silvis, C.; Roy, A.; Querelle, S.; Hilmayer, M.A. Interfacial Polymerization of Reactive Block Polymers for the Preparation of Composite Ultrafiltration Membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 18575–18579.
  55. Nielen, W.M.; Willot, J.D.; de Vos, W.M. Aqueous Phase Separation of Responsive Copolymers for Sustainable and Mechanically Stable Membranes. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020, 2, 1702–1710.
  56. Clarizia, G.; Tasselli, F.; Simari, C.; Nicotera, I.; Bernardo, P. Solution Casting Blending: An Effective Way for Tailoring Gas Transport and Mechanical Properties of Poly(vinyl butyral) and Pebax2533. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 11264–11272.
  57. Raje, A.; Koll, J.; Schneider, E.S.; Gerogopanos, P. A novel organic solvent-free method for manufacturing polyethersulfone hollow fiber membranes using melt extrusion. J. Membr. Sci. 2023, 683, 121837.
  58. Tekin, F.S.; Zeynep, P.; Emecen, C. Controlling Cellulose Membrane Performance via Solvent Choice during Precursor Membrane Formation. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2023, 5, 2185–2194.
  59. Lavielle, N.; Hebraud, A.; Schlatter, G.; Meyer, L.T.; Rossi, R.M.; Popa, A.M. Simultaneous Electrospinning and Electrospraying: A Straightforward Approach for Fabricating Hierarchically Structured Composite Membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 10090–10097.
  60. Avossa, J.; Herwig, G.; Toncelli, C.; Itel, F.; Rossi, R.M. Electrospinning based on benign solvents: Current definitions, implications and strategies. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 2347–2375.
  61. Magat, E.E.; Faris, B.F.; Reith, J.E.; Salisbury, L.F. Acid-catalyzed Reactions of Nitriles. I. The Reaction of Nitriles with Formaldehyde. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 1028–1031.
  62. Yuan, B.; Zhao, S.; Hu, P.; Cui, J.; Niu, Q.J. Asymmetric polyamide nanofilms with highly ordered nanovoids for water purification. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6102.
  63. Zapsas, G.; Patil, Y.; Gnanou, Y.; Ameduri, B.; Hadjichristidis, N. Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based complex macromolecular architectures: From synthesis to properties and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2020, 104, 101231.
  64. Pantuso, E.; Ahmed, E.; Fontananova, E.; Brunetti, A.; Tahir, I.; Karothu, D.P.; Alnaji, N.A.; Dushaq, G.; Rasras, M.; Naumov, P.; et al. Smart dynamic hybrid membranes with self-cleaning capability. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5751.
  65. Ahmed, E.; Karothu, D.P.; Warren, M.; Naumov, P. Shape-memory effects in molecular crystals. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3723.
  66. Wei, L.; Wang, G.; Cai, M. Synthesis and properties of novel poly(ether ketone ketone)s containing 1,4-naphthylene units by electrophilic solution copolycondensation. Polym. Int. 2021, 70, 1048–1056.
  67. Senra, M.R.; Vieira Marques, M.F.; Monteiro, S.N. Poly (Ether-Ether-Ketone) for Biomedical Applications: From Enhancing Bioactivity to Reinforced-Bioactive Composites—An Overview. Polymers 2023, 15, 373.
  68. Markova, D.; Kumar, A.; Kalpper, M.; Mullen, K. Phosphonic acid-containing homo-, AB and BAB block copolymers via ATRP designed for fuel cell applications. Polymer 2009, 50, 3411–3421.
  69. Kumar, A. Self Assemblies of Poly (ether ether ketone) Block Copolymers for Biomedical Applications. ChemistrySelect 2021, 6, 9060–9068.
  70. Aristizábal, S.L.; Chisca, S.; Pulido, B.A.; Nunes, S.P. Preparation of PEEK Membranes with Excellent Stability Using Common Organic Solvents. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 5218–5226.
  71. Zhang, S.; Chen, C.; Su, Z.; Qin, X.; Jiang, M.; Liu, P. High efficiency and flexible construction of hydrophilic polymer brushes on polyether ether ketone hollow-fiber membrane surface for improving permeability separation, and anti-fouling performances. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 454, 140176.
  72. Li, J.R.; Sculley, J.; Zhou, H.C. Metal-organic frameworks for separations. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 869–932.
  73. Geng, K.; He, T.; Liu, R.; Dalapati, S.; Tan, K.T.; Li, Z.; Tao, S.; Gong, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Jiang, D. Covalent Organic Frameworks: Design, Synthesis, and Functions. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 8814–8933.
  74. Wang, H.; Zhao, S.; Liu, Y.; Yao, R.; Wang, X.; Cao, Y.; Ma, D.; Zou, M.; Cao, A.; Feng, X.; et al. Membrane adsorbers with ultrahigh metal-organic framework loading for high flux separations. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4204.
  75. Shefer, I.; Peer-Haim, O.; Leifman, O.; Epsztein, R. Enthalpic and entropic selectivity of water and small ions in polyamide membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 14863–14875.
  76. Wang, H.; Zhai, Y.; Li, Y.; Cao, Y.; Shi, B.; Li, R.; Zhu, Z.; Jiang, H.; Guo, Z.; Wang, M.; et al. Covalent organic framework membranes for efficient separation of monovalent cations. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7123.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Polymer Science
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Avneesh Kumar
,
Dong Wook Chang
View Times: 107
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 23 Jan 2024
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback