You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Green Hydrogen
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/wevj14120349

Increasingly stringent sustainability and decarbonization objectives drive investments in adopting environmentally friendly, low, and zero-carbon fuels. Hydrogen represents a unique zero-carbon energy carrier akin to electricity. Hydrogen is hailed as a carbon-neutral fuel of the future, particularly in the form of green hydrogen. 

green hydrogen production storage properties application cost carbon-neutral

1. Introduction

During the Anthropocene era, our actions have significantly shaped the earth, leading to issues such as environmental contamination, changes in weather patterns, and the extinction of numerous species. The global need for energy continues to increase, primarily due to population growth, improved quality of life, and the industrial development of emerging nations [1]. In 2019, total global primary energy provision reached 4410 million tons of oil equivalent (MTOE) [2]. The International Energy Agency (IEA) forecasts a 50% surge in worldwide energy requirements by 2030 [3]. At present, fossil fuels satisfy more than 95% of this significant energy requirement, and their utilization leads to global warming and environmental contamination. To tackle these problems, a promising approach is replacing fossil fuel-based energy sources with renewable, carbon-neutral alternatives in the energy sector [4]. One pivotal solution in the transport sector is the advancement of internal combustion engines capable of operating on environmentally friendly fuels like green hydrogen, green ammonia, or green methanol [5]. This shift can decrease the release of greenhouse gases, alleviate global warming, and confront climate change.
In sustainable energy, the pursuit of green hydrogen, green ammonia, and green methanol has emerged as a promising avenue for curbing carbon emissions. Publication trends on green fuels in the recent decade, i.e., 2013–2023, were obtained using the Scopus search tool. The results were obtained using the keywords “green ammonia,” “green hydrogen,” and “green methanol,”. Overall, the number of publications is increasing continuously, though the yearly increase is regular.
Hydrogen represents a unique zero-carbon energy carrier akin to electricity. Hydrogen is hailed as a carbon-neutral fuel of the future, particularly in the form of green hydrogen. This thriving market is presently valued at more than USD 100 billion and is expected to grow substantially, reaching an impressive USD 2.5 trillion by 2050 [6]. Hydrogen production methods vary and can include natural gas, steam, coal, biomass conversion, electrolysis powered by renewable electricity, or virtually any other energy source. Each method has its distinct carbon-emissions profile.
On a global scale, hydrogen consumption was approximately 120 million metric tons in 2020, and this is projected to increase to 530 million metric tons annually by 2050. The worldwide production is about 75 million metric tons of pure hydrogen annually, accompanied by an additional 45 million metric tons of hydrogen as part of a gas mixture [7][8].
Identifying and implementing eco-friendly hydrogen production methods is greatly hindered by the requirement for a gradual transformation of national energy systems [9]. Hydrogen-focused decarbonization involves using hydrogen in energy-intensive industrial sectors, including energy, transportation, and the chemical industry, while encouraging its adoption in local markets and everyday utilities [9]. Hydrogen is a promising energy carrier and feedstock that offers a natural-based solution for fuel consumption and its associated environmental impacts [10].

2. Color Codes of Hydrogen

The production of hydrogen fuel is possible through diverse primary energy sources. Consequently, these technologies are classified into distinct categories, denoted by different colors, which reflect the production process, the type of energy utilized, and the costs and emissions associated with hydrogen production [11]. These classifications encompass green, blue, aqua, and white hydrogen (referred to as low-carbon hydrogen) alongside gray, brown, black, yellow, turquoise, purple, pink, and red hydrogen (refer to Table 1).
Presently, multiple approaches have been suggested to produce hydrogen in a more environmentally friendly manner [12][13][14]. Gray hydrogen production entails fossil fuels, primarily through reforming and pyrolysis techniques, with direct CO2 emissions, and minimal energy costs. In contrast, blue hydrogen, which involves carbon-capture utilization and storage (CCUS), has no direct CO2 emissions but comes with additional expenses for capturing and storing CO2 [11]. Hence, the production of green hydrogen through the electrolysis of water (H2O) is increasingly being recognized as the primary method for future hydrogen production. Presently, hydrogen gas is derived from a variety of sources, both renewable and non-renewable [15]. Renewable sources encompass biomass conversion; water electrolysis; and harnessing wind, solar, hydro, and nuclear energy.
These various methods of hydrogen generation come with their advantages and drawbacks, varying in terms of efficiency and costs [16]. Notably, a significant portion of hydrogen gas is generated through non-renewable means, mainly using the steam reforming of methane (SRM) [17]. Electrochemical water splitting has emerged as a highly promising method for generating hydrogen energy [18]. Hydrogen produced using renewable electricity from solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, and ocean sources is commonly called renewable hydrogen [15][19].
Table 1. Summary of different types of hydrogen and their characteristics [9][11][12][14][20].
Table
Hydrogen Technology Feedstock/Energy Source Products Emission
(kg CO2/kg H2)		 GHG Footprint Cost
(USD/kg H2)
Black Gasification Coal (Bitumen) H2 + CO2
Released		 21.8 High 1.2–2.0
Brown Gasification Coal (Lignite) H2 + CO2
Released		 20 High 1.2–2.0
Gray Reforming Natural Gas H2 + CO2 8.5–10.9 Medium 0.67–1.31
Blue Reforming + CCUS Natural Gas + CCUS
Coal + CCUS		 H2 + CO2 CCUS 1–2 Low 0.99–2.05
Turquoise Pyrolysis Methane H2 + C Solid Carbon Solid Carbon Solid Carbon 2.0–2.1
Yellow Electrolysis Water + Mixed origin Grid Energy H2 + O2 0 Medium 6.06–8.81
Pink/Violet Purple Electrolysis Water + Nuclear Energy H2 + O2 0 Minimal 2.18–5.92
Green Electrolysis Water + Renewable Energy H2 + O2 0 Minimal 2.28–7.39
Aqua Oxygen injection Oil sands
(Natural Bitumen)		 H2 + Carbon Oxides Geological storage - 0.23
White Fracking Naturally Occurring H2 0 Minimal -
Gold Water splitting Water +direct solar H2 + O2 0 Minimal -

3. Green Hydrogen Production and Storage

Green hydrogen refers to hydrogen derived from renewable sources, excluding biomass, and achieves an impressive 70% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to fossil fuels. Typically, this implies hydrogen production through water electrolysis, powered by renewable energy sources such as photovoltaic systems or wind turbines [19]. With technological advancements, the definition of green hydrogen has expanded to include considerations of potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, energy-related issues, and other climate impacts linked to the production process. Notably, the electrical energy utilized for water electrolysis is not limited to being exclusively generated from renewable sources. It can also be sourced from the conventional power grid [21]. Three primary technologies exist for producing green hydrogen through water electrolysis: alkaline water electrolysis (AEL), proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEMEL), and solid oxide electrolysis (SOEL). Among these, alkaline water electrolysis is recognized as a well-established and matured state-of-the-art technology [22]. Proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEMEL) employs a proton exchange membrane (PEM) in a zero-gap configuration, replacing the liquid electrolyte. This design enables direct contact between the electrodes and the surface of the proton [23]. Conversely, solid oxide electrolysis depends on water vapor electrolysis at elevated temperatures. Operating at higher temperatures reduces the energy demands for the water-splitting reaction and improves the efficiency of converting power into hydrogen [24].
Currently, the available methods for storing hydrogen include cryogenic freezing or liquefaction, compressed gas storage, and chemical storage alternatives like metal hydrides, chemical hydrides, and sorbents [25]. Metal hydrides and MOFs (Metal-Organic Frameworks) are promising materials for hydrogen storage, offering efficient and reversible means for storing hydrogen as a clean energy carrier [26]. Freezing or liquefying hydrogen demands substantial energy input, primarily because hydrogen has a shallow melting point and boiling point. Consequently, solid and liquid storage options may lead to an energy loss of up to 30% due to the significant energy consumption required for hydrogen freezing or liquefaction [27]. Additionally, achieving adequate insulation for such storage can be challenging. On the other hand, compressed hydrogen gas systems offer several advantages, including low energy requirements; cost-effectiveness; quick charge and discharge cycles across a broad temperature range, even under extremely low temperatures; and straightforward operation via a control valve. These systems can currently store pressurized gas within 35 MPa to 70 MPa [28].

4. Properties and Characteristics

Hydrogen, when used as a fuel or as an energy storage medium, has a negligible adverse environmental impact [27]. Moreover, hydrogen is the lightest and most abundant element in the universe, comprising 75% of all matter by mass and an impressive 90% when considering the number of atoms [29]. Hydrogen boasts an exceptional trait as an energy carrier: an impressively high energy density ranging from 120 to 140 megajoules per kilogram (MJ/kg), double that of typical solid fuels [30]. The combination of hydrogen and oxygen releases the highest energy per unit of fuel weight [31]. The heat energy generated from hydrogen combustion is approximately 142.26 kilojoules per gram (kJ/g).
In contrast, petroleum yields a heat energy of 35.15–43.10 kJ/g, and wood produces about 17.57 kJ/g [30]. It is important to highlight that although hydrogen has higher and lower ignition limits and lower ignition energy than gasoline and methane, it also possesses lower explosion energy. Additionally, hydrogen demonstrates lower toxicity levels than gasoline and methane when utilized as a fuel, leading to fewer toxic emissions post-combustion. With a higher ignition temperature and lower flame emissivity, hydrogen is collectively acknowledged as a safer fuel than gasoline and methane. Refer to Table 2 for a breakdown of some of the physical properties of green hydrogen.
Table 2. Properties of green hydrogen.
Table
Property Green Hydrogen
Chemical formula H2
Appearance Colorless and odorless gas
Molecular Mass 2.0156 g/mol
Melting temperature −259.2 °C
Density (20 °C) 0.0899 × 10−3 g/cm3
Boiling point −252.8 °C
Latent heat of vaporization 446 kJ/kg
Specific gravity 0.070
Thermal conductivity (NTP) 0.1825 W/m-K
Specific heat (kJ/kg-K) 1.44
Octane number, RON 109–114
Cetane number, CN 3
Flash point −253 °C
Storage pressure and temperature 0.1 MPa, 20 °C

5. Application

In the aerospace industry, hydrogen has demonstrated its capacity to serve as an outstanding energy source [29]. For green hydrogen to reach its full potential, it must be adapted for use in majorly polluting industries [29][32][33]. While the green hydrogen industry is still in its early stages, it has already seen the development of five significant applications for this renewable energy source [7][34][35][36]. It has gained considerable attention for its potential role in achieving low-carbon solutions in transportation industrial decarbonization, particularly within the oil and gas, fertilizer, fuel cell technology, petrochemical, petroleum, metal refining sectors, and also for heat supply across many nations [37].
  • Hydrogen feedstocks: Green hydrogen is employed to replace conventional feedstocks, as hydrogen production can be carbon intensive. Green hydrogen is produced using renewable energy, reducing carbon emissions associated with hydrogen production. It facilitates the integration of renewable energy sources into the power system, decreases reliance on imported fossil fuels, and reduces carbon footprint [32].
  • Residential and commercial heating systems: Green hydrogen decarbonizes heating systems in residential and commercial settings, where heating contributes significantly to carbon emissions. It can be mixed with natural gas in areas with higher natural gas prices [38].
  • Energy storage: Green hydrogen serves as a valuable energy storage option, although early attempts to develop hydrogen-based batteries have seen a decrease in energy efficiency compared to conventional batteries [26].
  • Alternative fuel production: Green hydrogen plays a role in producing alternative fuels.
  • Fuel cell vehicles: Green hydrogen is used to power these, although it has yet to gain substantial traction in the automotive market. Fuel cell electric vehicles are a transformative development in the energy and transport sector toward achieving a carbon-neutral footprint [39].
  • Industrial sector: Green hydrogen is increasingly finding applications in various industrial sectors, notably in the chemical industry for ammonia and fertilizer production, the petrochemical sector for manufacturing petroleum products, and the steel industry, where it is being employed to mitigate its environmental impact. This gas enables changes in industrial processes to make them more environmentally friendly, particularly in response to the ecological challenges faced by the European steel industry. Additionally, ongoing sustainable initiatives aim to substitute natural gas networks with green hydrogen networks for household use, providing households with cleaner sources of electricity and heat while minimizing pollutant emissions [40].

6. Cost Analysis

Recent studies suggest that the cost of renewable hydrogen production will need to be halved to be economically competitive with hydrogen produced using fossil fuels [41]. Green hydrogen cost depends on several factors, such as the location (easy/difficult access to green electricity), the production method (e.g., Alkaline Water Electrolyzer (AWE), Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM), Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Cell (SOEC), Anion Exchange Membrane Electrolysis (AEM), photocatalysis), or the capacity and lifetime of the facility; electrolysis efficiency; renewable energy costs; electrolyzer capital costs; operation and maintenance costs; scaling and capacity utilization; infrastructure and transportation; and government incentives, etc. [42]. The current cost range of green hydrogen is about USD 2.28–USD 7.39/kg H2 produced [14][43]. To decrease the high cost of the electrolysis process, it is necessary to find ideal materials to produce electrolytic cells and establish a large-scale electrolysis supply chain [44].
In the present scenario, improvements in electrolyzer efficiency have led to lower electricity consumption, reducing the cost of hydrogen production. Falling renewable energy prices substantially impact the cost of green hydrogen. As renewable energy costs decrease, green hydrogen becomes more competitive [45]. As electrolyzer manufacturing scales up and technology advances, capital costs are declining. This trend is expected to continue. Proper maintenance and operational practices can help control ongoing costs and maximize equipment lifespan. Large-scale production facilities tend to have lower production costs per hydrogen unit [46]. Efficient use of capacity is essential to cost optimization. It is vital to provide government support and incentives, such as subsidies and tax credits, which can significantly reduce the cost of green hydrogen. The advances in research in this area will result in a reduction in production costs. The price of green hydrogen for commercial use is expected to be reduced by 2030 [7][8].

7. Pros and Cons of Green Hydrogen

Green hydrogen, produced through renewable methods, is a promising solution for transitioning to a sustainable-energy landscape. Its primary advantages lie in its potential to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, offering a clean alternative for various industries, particularly transportation and heavy manufacturing. The versatility of green hydrogen in energy storage and its capability to be a key player in decarbonizing industrial sectors make it a frontrunner in carbon-neutrality goals. However, challenges include high production costs, the need for extensive infrastructure development, and the energy-intensive nature of its production process. Table 3 highlights the pros and cons of green hydrogen.
Table 3. Pros and cons of green H2 [11][47][48][49].
Table
Pros Cons
  • Eco-friendly power
  • Versatile energy carrier
  • Efficient energy storage solution
  • Generates job opportunities
  • Utilizing excess renewable energy
  • Decarbonize industries
  • Elevated production costs
  • Infrastructure establishment
  • Technical hurdles
  • Competition from other green fuels
  • Secondary energy carrier
  • Economically not feasible

References

  1. Nemmour, A.; Inayat, A.; Janajreh, I.; Ghenai, C. Green hydrogen-based E-fuels (E-methane, E-methanol, E-ammonia) to support clean energy transition: A literature review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 29011–29033.
  2. Yolcan, O.O. World energy outlook and state of renewable energy: 10-Year evaluation. Innov. Green Dev. 2023, 2, 100070.
  3. Khatib, H. IEA World Energy Outlook 2010—A comment. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 2507–2511.
  4. Hariram, N.P.; Mekha, K.B.; Suganthan, V.; Sudhakar, K. Sustainalism: An Integrated Socio-Economic-Environmental Model to Address Sustainable Development and Sustainability. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10682.
  5. Shi, J.; Zhu, Y.; Feng, Y.; Yang, J.; Xia, C. A Prompt Decarbonization Pathway for Shipping: Green Hydrogen, Ammonia, and Methanol Production and Utilization in Marine Engines. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 584.
  6. Net Zero Technology Centre. Technology Driving Transition. Closing the Gap a Global Perspective; Net Zero Technology Centre: Aberdeen, UK, 2022.
  7. International Energy Agency. Net Zero by 2050—A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector; IEA Publications: Paris, France, 2022.
  8. International Energy Agency. Global Hydrogen Review 2022; IEA Publications: Paris, France, 2022.
  9. Hermesmann, M.; Müller, T. Green, Turquoise, Blue, or Grey? Environmentally friendly Hydrogen Production in Transforming Energy Systems. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2022, 90, 100996.
  10. International Energy Agency. Global Hydrogen Review 2021; IEA Publications: Paris, France, 2021.
  11. Ajanovic, A.; Sayer, M.; Haas, R. The economics and the environmental benignity of different colors of hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 24136–24154.
  12. Lubbe, F.; Rongé, J.; Bosserez, T.; Martens, J.A. Golden hydrogen. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2023, 39, 100732.
  13. Boretti, A. White is the color of hydrogen from concentrated solar energy and thermochemical water splitting cycles. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 20790–20791.
  14. Yu, M.; Wang, K.; Vredenburg, H. Insights into low-carbon hydrogen production methods: Green, blue and aqua hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 21261–21273.
  15. Tashie-Lewis, B.C.; Nnabuife, S.G. Hydrogen Production, Distribution, Storage and Power Conversion in a Hydrogen Economy—A Technology Review. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2021, 8, 100172.
  16. Zghaibeh, M.; Barhoumi, E.M.; Okonkwo, P.C.; Ben Belgacem, I.; Beitelmal, W.H.; Mansir, I.B. Analytical model for a techno-economic assessment of green hydrogen production in photovoltaic power station case study Salalah city-Oman. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 14171–14179.
  17. Mosca, L.; Jimenez, J.A.M.; Wassie, S.A.; Gallucci, F.; Palo, E.; Colozzi, M.; Taraschi, S.; Galdieri, G. Process design for green hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 7266–7277.
  18. Pein, M.; Neumann, N.C.; Venstrom, L.J.; Vieten, J.; Roeb, M.; Sattler, C. Two-step thermochemical electrolysis: An approach for green hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 24909–24918.
  19. Macedo, S.F.; Peyerl, D. Prospects and economic feasibility analysis of wind and solar photovoltaic hybrid systems for hydrogen production and storage: A case study of the Brazilian electric power sector. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 10460–10473.
  20. Cloete, S.; del Pozo, C.A.; Álvaro, J. System-friendly process design: Optimizing blue hydrogen production for future energy systems. Energy 2022, 259, 124954.
  21. Mazzeo, D.; Herdem, M.S.; Matera, N.; Wen, J.Z. Green hydrogen production: Analysis for different single or combined large-scale photovoltaic and wind renewable systems. Renew. Energy 2022, 200, 360–378.
  22. Van Hoecke, L.; Laffineur, L.; Campe, R.; Perreault, P.; Verbruggen, S.W.; Lenaerts, S. Challenges in the use of hydrogen for maritime applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 815–843.
  23. Srettiwat, N.; Safari, M.; Olcay, H.; Malina, R. A techno-economic evaluation of solar-powered green hydrogen production for sustainable energy consumption in Belgium. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 39731–39746.
  24. The Future of Hydrogen-Seizing Today Opportunities. International Energy Agency. 2019. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-hydrogen (accessed on 15 October 2023).
  25. Ma, N.; Zhao, W.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Zhou, H. Large scale of green hydrogen storage: Opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 50, 379–396.
  26. Shet, S.P.; Priya, S.S.; Sudhakar, K.; Tahir, M. A review on current trends in potential use of metal-organic framework for hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 11782–11803.
  27. Liu, L.; Zhai, R.; Hu, Y. Performance evaluation of wind-solar-hydrogen system for renewable energy generation and green hydrogen generation and storage: Energy, exergy, economic, and enviroeconomic. Energy 2023, 276, 127386.
  28. YYounas, M.; Rezakazemi, M.; Arbab, M.S.; Shah, J.; Rehman, W.U. Green hydrogen storage and delivery: Utilizing highly active homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts for formic acid dehydrogenation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 11694–11724.
  29. Razmi, A.R.; Hanifi, A.R.; Shahbakhti, M. Design, thermodynamic, and economic analyses of a green hydrogen storage concept based on solid oxide electrolyzer/fuel cells and heliostat solar field. Renew. Energy 2023, 215, 118996.
  30. Burton, N.; Padilla, R.; Rose, A.; Habibullah, H. Increasing the efficiency of hydrogen production from solar powered water electrolysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 135, 110255.
  31. Wappler, M.; Unguder, D.; Lu, X.; Ohlmeyer, H.; Teschke, H.; Lueke, W. Building the green hydrogen market—Current state and outlook on green hydrogen demand and electrolyzer manufacturing. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 33551–33570.
  32. Lagioia, G.; Spinelli, M.P.; Amicarelli, V. Blue and green hydrogen energy to meet European Union decarbonisation objectives. An overview of perspectives and the current state of affairs. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 1304–1322.
  33. Panić, I.; Cuculić, A.; Ćelić, J. Color-Coded Hydrogen: Production and Storage in Maritime Sector. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1995.
  34. Minutillo, M.; Perna, A.; Sorce, A. Green hydrogen production plants via biogas steam and autothermal reforming processes: Energy and exergy analyses. Appl. Energy 2020, 277, 115452.
  35. El-Emam, R.S.; Özcan, H. Comprehensive review on the techno-economics of sustainable large-scale clean hydrogen production. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 220, 593–609.
  36. Barhoumi, E.M.; Okonkwo, P.C.; Ben Belgacem, I.; Zghaibeh, M.; Tlili, I. Optimal sizing of photovoltaic systems based green hydrogen refueling stations case study Oman. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 31964–31973.
  37. Kumar, S.S.; Lim, H. An overview of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 13793–13813.
  38. Karayel, G.K.; Javani, N.; Dincer, I. A comprehensive assessment of energy storage options for green hydrogen. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 291, 117311.
  39. Staffell, I.; Scamman, D.; Velazquez Abad, A.; Balcombe, P.; Dodds, P.E.; Ekins, P.; Shah, N.; Ward, K.R. The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 463–491.
  40. Roy, A.; Pramanik, S. A review of the hydrogen fuel path to emission reduction in the surface transport industry. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 49, 792–821.
  41. Sens, L.; Piguel, Y.; Neuling, U.; Timmerberg, S.; Wilbrand, K.; Kaltschmitt, M. Cost minimized hydrogen from solar and wind—Production and supply in the European catchment area. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 265, 115742.
  42. Salehmin, M.N.I.; Husaini, T.; Goh, J.; Sulong, A.B. High-pressure PEM water electrolyser: A review on challenges and mitigation strategies towards green and low-cost hydrogen production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 268, 115985.
  43. Arcos, J.M.M.; Santos, D.M.F. The Hydrogen Color Spectrum: Techno-Economic Analysis of the Available Technologies for Hydrogen Production. Gases 2023, 3, 25–46.
  44. Ueckerdt, F.; Verpoort, P.; Anantharaman, R.; Bauer, C.; Beck, F.; Longden, T.; Roussanaly, S. On the Cost Competitiveness of Blue and Green Hydrogen; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023.
  45. Boretti, A. There are hydrogen production pathways with better than green hydrogen economic and environmental costs. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 23988–23995.
  46. Moritz, M.; Schönfisch, M.; Schulte, S. Estimating global production and supply costs for green hydrogen and hydrogen-based green energy commodities. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 9139–9154.
  47. Carlson, E.L.; Pickford, K.; Nyga-Łukaszewska, H. Green hydrogen and an evolving concept of energy security: Challenges and comparisons. Renew. Energy 2022, 219, 119410.
  48. Ayodele, T.; Munda, J. Potential and economic viability of green hydrogen production by water electrolysis using wind energy resources in South Africa. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 17669–17687.
  49. Ali, M.S.; Hossain Khan, M.S.; Tuhin, R.A.; Kabir, M.A.; Azad, A.K.; Farrok, O. Hydrogen energy storage and transportation challenges. In Hydrogen Energy Conversion and Management; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 255–287.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Green & Sustainable Science & Technology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Vennapusa Jagadeeswara Reddy
,
N. P. Hariram
,
Rittick Maity
,
Mohd Fairusham Ghazali
,
Sudhakar Kumarasamy
View Times: 416
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 12 Jan 2024
Table of Contents
Academic Video Service
Feedback