Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Dorotea Ottaviani
 -- 1645 2024-01-11 09:51:58 |
2 format correct
Catherine Yang
 Meta information modification 1645 2024-01-11 09:57:34 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Ottaviani, D.; Demiröz, M.; Szemző, H.; De Luca, C. Heritage-Based Tourism. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53731 (accessed on 17 May 2024).
Ottaviani D, Demiröz M, Szemző H, De Luca C. Heritage-Based Tourism. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53731. Accessed May 17, 2024.
Ottaviani, Dorotea, Merve Demiröz, Hanna Szemző, Claudia De Luca. "Heritage-Based Tourism" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53731 (accessed May 17, 2024).
Ottaviani, D., Demiröz, M., Szemző, H., & De Luca, C. (2024, January 11). Heritage-Based Tourism. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53731
Ottaviani, Dorotea, et al. "Heritage-Based Tourism." Encyclopedia. Web. 11 January, 2024.
Heritage-Based Tourism
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/su15064741

Sustainable cultural tourism, understood as heritage-based tourism, can support inclusive and sustainable development, especially in remote or peripheral areas.

heritage-based tourism participatory process sustainability

1. Introduction

According to the World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) in the last three decades, tourism has been one of the largest sectors in the global economy and it continues to grow in today’s world. Tourism produced 9% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and 8% of the world’s employment in 2019 and it plays a prominent role within the EU countries’ economy [1], contributing, for example, to 15% of employment in a country such as Italy and a relative 13% of Italian GDP in 2019 [2]. Cultural tourism is one of the most important segments of tourism [3] and is increasingly a major slice of the cultural sector in general [4]. Cultural tourism, which usually overlaps with the term heritage tourism, is mainly rooted in heritage resources in a local context [5] and is related to heritage management and development [6]. This particularly resonates in Europe, where heritage is considered “the oldest and most important generator of tourism” [7]. Hence, tourism has become increasingly important to local communities in terms of resources used and income produced, and, consequently, the need to sustainably develop tourism has become a primary concern [8]. Therefore, the development of a sustainable form of cultural tourism is considered a compromise between the conservation of cultural heritage, the financial benefits of local communities, and public access to the resources [9].
The relationship between heritage, tourism, and sustainable development has not always been straightforward in the policy development context and it was not explicitly mentioned until 1997 in the Agenda 21 for the Travel and Tourism Industry [10]. Setting out the priorities for sustainable development in the 21st century, it identifies tourism as a form of economic development aiming at improving the quality of life of the host community, providing a high quality of experience for the visitors, and maintaining the quality of the environment. This was further elaborated by the UNWTO, stating that “Sustainable tourism development meets the needs of present tourists and host regions while protecting and enhancing opportunities for the future” [11]. Especially for marginalized, remote, or peripheral areas, sustainability has become fundamental as the communities need to support themselves with their available resources [8][12]. Importantly, sustainable tourism is an overarching category and is conveniently defined to include all types of tourism (conventional or alternative forms) that are compatible with or contribute to sustainable development [13].
Although sustainability in tourism is often criticized as a vague concept, [14][15], Richards and Hall [8] observed that, for a viable and efficient approach to sustainability in tourism, a continuous improvement of the social, cultural, and economic well-being of communities is required, and this must be wholly integrated with the care for the environment. This statement connects the development of tourism to the three aspects that have imbued the definition of sustainability since the Brundtland report [16], namely economically, socially, and environmentally sustainable development. The recent literature has expanded this interpretation of sustainability to include cultural sustainability in tourism development [17][18][19].

2. Four Pillars of Sustainability for Cultural Tourism Development

In recent decades, the “three pillars” of the sustainability concept, namely social, economic, and environmental sustainability, have started to evolve to include culture as a fourth pillar both at international and European policy levels [17][18] and in research [20][21][22][23]. As Nurse [21] suggests, culture needs to be included in the discourse around sustainability in a twofold way. On the one hand, it needs to be included in terms of how the “culture of sustainable development” has evolved into a global agenda. On the other hand, the cultural arena, not intended just as the manifestation of culture, but instead as “cultural vitality”, namely “wellbeing, creativity, diversity and innovation” [20], should be treated as one of the basic requirements of a healthy society and, finally, culture itself can be facilitated by the construct of sustainable development.
Although the role of culture is growing and it has started to become acknowledged, most of the attention in sustainable tourism is still drawn toward environmental and economic issues linked to tourism development, followed by growing attention toward the social aspects of the tourism development discourse [24].
Culture as a pivotal driver for the sustainable development of tourism has been overlooked to such an extent that the definition of sustainable development preferred by the World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) on their website still lacks it.
Many scholars have neglected the role of culture in the sustainable development of tourism, focusing solely on the sustainability of tourism as a means to reduce the tensions and to retain the long-term capacity of natural and human resources [25] or as a channel to contribute to sustainable use of economic, societal, and environmental resources [13]. Others [13] strictly excluded culture from the definition of sustainable tourism, such as Farrell [26], who argues that the “sustainability trinity” builds on the smooth and transparent integration of economy, society, and environment to achieve sustainable tourism, or Cater [27], who further identifies three key objectives for sustainable tourism in social, economic, and environmental goals.
These limited definitions contrast with a more extended vision of sustainable tourism building equally on the four pillars of sustainable development which this research enhances and moves forward.

3. Inclusive Participation in Cultural Tourism Development

Participatory models move away from hierarchical decision making to equalize the power between all parties involved and to promote an equally desirable situation in tourism planning and development for everyone involved [27][28][29][30][31][32]. Participation is defined as “a process of involving all stakeholders (local government officials, local citizens, architects, developers, businesspeople, and planners) in such a way that decision-making is shared” [33]. It means shifting the power of development from “external experts” and governmental bodies to citizens and local communities to allow them to share decision making, responsibilities, and, additionally, the advantages of tourism development.
Generally, decision makers tend to respect the community values once a participatory approach is embraced at the stages of planning [27][30][31][34]. Vernon et al. [35] affirm that a collaborative approach, especially in the tourism sector, should be interpreted as an interactive and iterative process of sharing experiences and ideas, as well as the means to identify and form a pool of finance and human resources among stakeholders and the local community to fulfil a specific goal. The application of participatory models in tourism is also relevant in enhancing Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals, specifically the goals focusing on sustainable consumption and production, inclusive and sustainable growth, sustainable cities and communities, and the use of marine resources.
Nevertheless, whilst collaboration and participation have been part of the tourism lexicon for a long time [36][37], it has always been challenging to implement collaborative principles in practice [38][39][40]. Collaborative planning can result in a complex social and political process where many interconnected and interdependent parties have to work together to develop local and regional solutions. Problems in achieving participatory planning that are commonly reported are insufficient trust between stakeholders, lack of time and resources, roadblocks to finding consensus, diffidence to share power, and disbelief about the quality of collective decisions [19][41][42][43][44][45][46].
The stated problems are also relevant in the cases of participatory tourism planning. However, to ensure that the benefits of tourism are related to the needs of the hosting community and to develop support and acceptance of tourism development, community participation is highly recommended and considered necessary [41]. The goal of a participatory approach is eventually to create an equilibrium in the power differential between all parties and to forge an equally suitable situation in tourism development for all the people involved and affected [28][32][44][45][46][47].
Participation also allows for a framework for a more equal confrontation and discussion between those who traditionally have knowledge, money, and authority, such as investors, governments, and external experts, and the host community [48].
Another rationale for the participative approach resides in its positive outcomes such as: “decision-making based on public opinion, improved decision legitimacy and quality, enhancing tourism products portfolio, generating new ideas and innovations, increased trust among stakeholders, conflict reduction, cost reduction, and efficiency, and shared responsibility” [49][50]. In this way, the indigenous people become the main actor and decision maker in the planning, development, and management of resources needed for the tourism industry [51]. Therefore, the quality of human capital [27][30][31][52][53] such as the destination managers, local entrepreneurs, inhabitants, and NGOs, as they will be presented more in-depth in the following section, is a key precondition to successful participatory processes.
For all the reasons given, many scholars and practitioners accept that sustainable tourism needs to be based on community participation as a basis for its development and, as a service industry, tourism depends to a great extent on the goodwill and cooperation of the host communities. Virtually, all analyses on tourism show that the cordiality and goodwill of the local people are estimated high on the list of positive aspects of a destination [54]. These characteristics are particularly important in cultural tourism, where the local community can be considered as an integral part of the product. The implementation of sustainable tourism activities and actions becomes the result of the consensus of the local community and stakeholders with efficient utilization of local human capital and local resources, especially those with unique value as in the case of cultural heritage, especially for cultural tourism [55].
Much research has shown that excluding local groups from decision-making processes could lead to tourism development in contrast to the preferences of some groups and lead to unsustainable tourism paths and impacts [56][57][58]. In some places such as more marginalized, rural, or peripheric areas, local communities could prefer not to attract huge businesses and big external investors to their local areas even though they could bring job opportunities and could prefer having control over local tourism activities. These types of discussions and sharing opinions from the public can only happen by promoting diversity and inclusion in participatory tourism development processes.
To this end, an inclusive participatory process in practice aims to involve as many diverse social and cultural groups as possible to achieve the most diverse representation. However, this can be challenging as well.

References

  1. World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). International Tourism Highlights; World Tourism Organization (UNWTO): Madrid, Spain, 2019.
  2. European Court of Auditors. Sostegno dell’UE al Turismo: C’è Bisogno di un Rinnovato Orientamento Strategico e di un Migliore Approccio in Materia di Finanziamenti; Relazione Speciale n. 27, 2021; Publications Office: Luxembourg, 2021; Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2865/766 (accessed on 18 November 2022).
  3. Richards, G. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The Impact of Culture on Tourism; OECD: Paris, France, 2009.
  4. Richards, G. Creativity and tourism in the city. Curr. Issues Tour. 2012, 17, 119–144.
  5. Timothy, D.J. Cultural Heritage and Tourism: An Introduction; Channel View Publications: Bristol, UK, 2011.
  6. Guzmán, P.C.; Roders, A.R.P.; Colenbrander, B.J.F. Measuring links between cultural heritage management and sustainable urban development: An overview of global monitoring tools. Cities 2017, 60A, 192–201.
  7. Thorburn, A. Marketing Cultural Heritage. Does It Work within Europe? Travel Tour. Anal. 1986, 39–48. Available online: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19871840663 (accessed on 25 December 2022).
  8. Richards, G.; Hall, D. The community: A sustainable concept in tourism development? In Tourism and Sustainable Community Development; Richards, G., Hall, D., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 1–14.
  9. Dai, T.; Zheng, X.; Yan, J. Contradictory or aligned? The nexus between authenticity in heritage conservation and heritage tourism, and its impact on satisfaction. Habitat Int. 2020, 107, 102307.
  10. World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). Agenda 21 for the Travel and Tourism Industry; World Tourism Organization (UNWTO): Madrid, Spain, 1997.
  11. Butler, R.W. Sustainable tourism: A state-of-the-art review. Tour. Geogr. 1999, 1, 7–25.
  12. Jamal, T.; Camargo, B.A. Sustainable tourism, justice and an ethic of care: Toward the Just Destination. J. Sustain. Tour. 2013, 22, 11–30.
  13. Liu, Z. Sustainable Tourism Development: A Critique. J. Sustain. Tour. 2003, 11, 459–475.
  14. Sharpley, R. Tourism and Sustainable Development: Exploring the Theoretical Divide. J. Sustain. Tour. 2000, 8, 1–19.
  15. Mundt, J.W. Tourism and Sustainable Development: Reconsidering a Concept of Vague Policies; E. Schmidt: Berlin, Germany, 2011.
  16. UN. Secretary-General World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development; UN: Geneva, Switzerland, 1987.
  17. UN General Assembly. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Developmen; UN General Assembly: New York, NY, USA, 2015; Volume 56350.
  18. European Commission. Getting Cultural Heritage to Work for Europe: Report of the Horizon 2020 Expert Group on Cultural Heritage; European Union: Luxembourg, 2015.
  19. Egusquiza, A.; Zubiaga, M.; Gandini, A.; de Luca, C.; Tondelli, S. Systemic Innovation Areas for Heritage-Led Rural Regeneration: A Multilevel Repository of Best Practices. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5069.
  20. Hawkes, J. The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Culture’s Essential Role in Public Planning; Common Ground Publishing: Champaign, IL, USA, 2001.
  21. Nurse, K. Culture as the Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development. Small States Econ. Rev. Basic Stat. 2006, 11, 28–40.
  22. Soini, K.; Birkeland, I. Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability. Geoforum 2014, 51, 213–223.
  23. Sabatini, F. Culture as Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development: Perspectives for Integration, Paradigms of Action. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 8, 31.
  24. Moscardo, G. Exploring social representations of tourism planning: Issues for governance. J. Sustain. Tour. 2011, 19, 423–436.
  25. Bramwell, B.; Lane, B. Sustainable Tourism: An Evolving Global Approach. J. Sustain. Tour. 1993, 1, 1–5.
  26. Farrell, B. Conventional or sustainable tourism? No room for choice. Tour. Manag. 1999, 20, 189–192.
  27. Cater, E. Ecotourism in the third world: Problems and prospects for sustainability. In Ecotourism: A Sustainable Option? Cater, E., Lowman, G., Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1994; pp. 69–86.
  28. Ozcevik, O.; Beygo, C.; Akcakaya, I. Building Capacity through Collaborative Local Action: Case of Matra REGIMA within Zaytinburunu Regenaration Scheme. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2010, 136, 169–175.
  29. Wang, Y.; Fesenmaier, D.R. Collaborative destination marketing: A case study of Elkhart county, Indiana. Tour. Manag. 2007, 28, 863–875.
  30. Wild, C. Issues in ecotourism. In Progress in Tourism, Recreation and Hospitality Management; Cooper, C.P., Lockwood, A., Archer, B.H., Eds.; Belhaven: Chichester, UK, 1994; pp. 12–21.
  31. Murphy, P.E. Tourism: A Community Approach; Methuen: New York, NY, USA, 1985.
  32. Arnstein, S.R. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 1969, 35, 216–224.
  33. Haywood, K. Responsible and responsive tourism planning in the community. In Tourism Management; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  34. Calzada, I. Local entrepreneurship through a multistakeholders’ tourism living lab in the post-violence/peripheral era in the Basque Country. Reg. Sci. Policy Pract. 2019, 11, 451–466.
  35. Vernon, J.; Essex, S.; Pinder, D.; Curry, K. Collaborative policymaking: Local Sustainable Projects. Ann. Tour. Res. 2005, 32, 325–345.
  36. Bramwell, B.; Lane, B. Tourism, Collaboration, and Partnerships: Politics, Practice, and Sustainability; Channel View Publications: Clevedon, UK; Buffalo, NY, USA, 2000.
  37. Jelinčić, D.A. Creating Experiences in Cultural Tourism: From Sightseeing to Engaged Emotional Action. In Creating and Managing Experiences in Cultural Tourism; World Scientific: Singapore, 2019; pp. 3–16.
  38. Mustapha, N.A.; Azman, I. Barriers to community participation in tourism development in island destination/Nor Azah Mustapha and Inoormaziah Azman. J. Tour. Hosp. Culin. Arts JTHCA 2013, 5, 102–124.
  39. Dogra, R.; Gupta, A.K. Barriers to Community Participation in Tourism Development: Empirical Evidence from a Rural Destination. South Asian J. Tour. Herit. 2012, 5, 129–142.
  40. Tosun, C. Limits to community participation in the tourism development process in developing countries. Tour. Manag. 2000, 21, 613–633.
  41. Cole, S. Information and Empowerment: The Keys to Achieving Sustainable Tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2006, 14, 629–644.
  42. Dragouni, M.; Fouseki, K.; Georgantzis, N. Community participation in heritage tourism planning: Is it too much to ask? J. Sustain. Tour. 2018, 26, 759–781.
  43. Marzuki, S.Z.S.; Hall, C.M.; Ballantine, P.W. Restaurant managers’ perspectives on halal certification. J. Islam. Mark. 2012, 3, 47–58.
  44. Botes, L.; van Rensburg, D. Community participation in development: Nine plagues and twelve commandments. Community Dev. J. 2000, 35, 41–58.
  45. Porritt, J. Foreword. In Community and Sustainable Development: Participation in the Future; Warburton, R.D., Ed.; Earthscan: London, UK, 2000.
  46. Simmons, D.G. Community participation in tourism planning. Tour. Manag. 1994, 15, 98–108.
  47. Robson, J.; Robson, I. From shareholders to stakeholders: Critical issues for tourism marketers. Tour. Manag. 1996, 17, 533–540.
  48. Vijayanand, S. Pilgrimage Tourism and its Issues and Challenges with Special Reference to Nagapattinam District. Asean J. Hosp. Tour. 2013, 12, 119–140.
  49. Byrd, E.T. Stakeholders in sustainable tourism development and their roles: Applying stakeholder theory to sustainable tourism development. Tour. Rev. 2007, 62, 6–13.
  50. Palmer, A.; Bejou, D. Tourism destination marketing alliances. Ann. Tour. Res. 1995, 22, 616–629.
  51. Simpson, M.C. Community Benefit Tourism Initiatives—A conceptual oxymoron? Tour. Manag. 2008, 29, 1–18.
  52. Pedersen, A. Issues, Problems, and Lessons Learned from Ecotourism Planning Projects; Kusler, J., Ed.; Omnipress: Madison, MI, USA, 1991; pp. 61–74.
  53. Ross, S.; Wall, G. Ecotourism: Towards congruence between theory and practice. Tour. Manag. 1999, 20, 123–132.
  54. Sweeney, W. Hosting the guest: Changing local attitudes and behaviour. In Educating the Educators in Tourism: A Manual of Tourism and Hospitality Education; Cooper, C., Shepherd, R., Westlake, J., Eds.; World Tourism Organization: Madrid, Spain, 1996; pp. 148–159.
  55. Scheyvens, R.; Biddulph, R. Inclusive tourism development. Tour. Geogr. 2018, 20, 589–609.
  56. Idziak, W.; Majewski, J.; Zmyślony, P. Community participation in sustainable rural tourism experience creation: A long-term appraisal andlessons from a thematic villages project in Poland. J. Sustain. Tour. 2015, 23, 1–22.
  57. Mak, B.K.L.; Cheung, L.T.O.; Hui, D.L.H. Community Participation in the Decision-Making Process for Sustainable Tourism Development in Rural Areas of Hong Kong, China. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1695.
  58. Richards, G. Cultural tourism: A review of recent research and trends. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2018, 36, 12–21.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Regional & Urban Planning
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Dorotea Ottaviani
,
Merve Demiröz
,
Hanna Szemző
,
Claudia De Luca
View Times: 68
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 11 Jan 2024
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Feedback