Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Mahmoud Ramadan Barakat
 -- 1338 2023-12-31 14:37:00 |
2 format
Jason Zhu
 Meta information modification 1338 2024-01-02 04:29:56 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Barakat, M.; Wu, J.S.; Tipi, N. Empowering Clusters for Sustainable Supply Chain in Egypt. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53292 (accessed on 01 July 2024).
Barakat M, Wu JS, Tipi N. Empowering Clusters for Sustainable Supply Chain in Egypt. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53292. Accessed July 01, 2024.
Barakat, Mahmoud, Jialin Snow Wu, Nicoleta Tipi. "Empowering Clusters for Sustainable Supply Chain in Egypt" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53292 (accessed July 01, 2024).
Barakat, M., Wu, J.S., & Tipi, N. (2023, December 31). Empowering Clusters for Sustainable Supply Chain in Egypt. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53292
Barakat, Mahmoud, et al. "Empowering Clusters for Sustainable Supply Chain in Egypt." Encyclopedia. Web. 31 December, 2023.
Empowering Clusters for Sustainable Supply Chain in Egypt
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/su152416787

The high frequency of market shocks pushes organisations to focus on cost reduction and financial gains at the expense of social and environmental issues, which leads to health and safety issues. Especially in supply chain clusters (SCCs), the concentration of industrial and logistics activities, such as transportation, raises environmental issues and harms the surrounding communities.

resilience absorptive capacity sustainability supply chain cluster Egyptian market

1. Introduction

The high frequency of market shocks pushes organisations to focus on cost reduction and financial gains at the expense of social and environmental issues, which leads to health and safety issues [1]. Especially in supply chain clusters (SCCs), the concentration of industrial and logistics activities, such as transportation, raises environmental issues and harms the surrounding communities [2]. SCCs help organisations recover from disruptions and seek financial gains collaboratively, as they can enhance the interconnectivity of geographically concentrated businesses, which creates mutual trust and eventually enhances their competitive advantage [3]. However, the enhanced awareness of sustainability from stakeholders is pushing organisations to take action towards the implementation of environmental and social activities [4]. To form a SCC, organisations must be geographically concentrated (situated locally, within and around the city) and interrelated and have a high level of cooperation; the geographical concentration and networked collaboration facilitate strong information and resource sharing and enhance trust. In addition, SCC also contains supporting entities (e.g., governmental agencies and research institutes) which enhance overall cluster development as they provide training and technical support [3]. These three characteristics are considered to be supply chain cluster design characteristics (SCCDCs) [3][5].
Supply chains as a system allow organisations to create a pool of shared resources and information and collaborate to enhance the overall performance of the supply chain by enhancing their own organisations’ performance [6]. Systems theory focuses on how organisations in a system (supply chains [7] or SCCs [8]) can work together to cope with market changes through sharing information and resources [7]. In this sense, SCCs are considered to be a system where the three characteristics facilitate the creation and development of resources and knowledge and allow organisations to have access to this collective knowledge and resources quickly and easily [8]. In order to gain the full benefits of SCC, the focus has predominantly been placed on dynamic capabilities (DCs) on economic sustainability regarding how DCs can help organisations adapt to market changes [9], especially since connectedness can lead to cascading failure, which stresses the importance of DCs [10]. However, there are relatively fewer research efforts carried out to assess their impact on social and environmental sustainability in the SCC context. DCs, such as resilience and absorptive capacity (AC), can help organisations enhance their sustainability through efficient and quick responses to market changes [11][12]. Resilience focuses on helping organisations survive and thrive through building capabilities that can help them recover quickly and efficiently from disasters that negatively affect their performance [13]. In addition, it allows organisations to keep their desired level of performance during disruptions [14][15][16]. AC, on the other hand, enhances organisations’ ability to utilise acquired knowledge to promote their adaptability [17]. This can be achieved through improving the efficiency of business processes, using resources efficiently and promoting innovation [18]. These two DCs are particularly important during disruptions in helping organisations to reduce risk and safeguard competitive advantage, but limited information is known regarding their roles in affecting social and environmental sustainability performance (e.g., efficient control of waste and cost [19] and enhancing employees’ work conditions [20]). Focusing on the three aspects of sustainability (environmental, social and economic) [19] will help SCCs organisations with a holistic approach [8] and incentives through promoting economic sustainability, along with environmental and social sustainability [21].

2. Relationship between SCCDCs and DCs

SCCDCs facilitate strong information and resource sharing, which enhances trust among supply chain cluster members. In addition, SCC also contains supporting entities (e.g., governmental agencies and research institutes) that enhance overall cluster development as they provide training and technical support [3]. This supports organisations’ ability to adapt to changes and make use of opportunities [22][23][24]. In turn, it facilitates their development of absorptive capacity [12] and resilience [20][25], especially since collaboration and governance among organisations support supply chain dynamic capabilities [26].
Since organisations’ capabilities can be enhanced through the integration of resources among the system’s members [27], and the shared infrastructure provided through clustering allows organisations to adapt quickly to market shocks [28], it can be argued that SCCDCs can be used to enhance resilience, and especially that strong partnerships can increase resilience [29]. Organisations in a SCC can exploit external knowledge by hiring skilled labour and acquiring information and knowledge from the pool created by SCCDC [30], which enhances creativity and innovation [31][32]. Since AC can be enhanced through the facilitation of sharing knowledge and information [33] and access to new skills and resources [34], it can be argued that SCCDCs can pave the way for organisations to develop their AC. In return, AC helps in enhancing the organisational ability to combine acquired information with existing knowledge in order to create new useful knowledge [34][35].

3. Relationship between DCs and Sustainability

Market shocks, which are frequently occurring, keep organisations focus away from enhancing sustainability [1]. Improving sustainability will not just benefit society or the surrounding environment, but it will also benefit the organisations as it increases all stakeholders’ satisfaction [4]. Organisations can use DCs to enhance sustainability performance [12], as it allows organisations to reorganise and modify their processes and resources related to sustainability performance to meet the constantly changing market requirements [1].
In order to build resilience, organisations are required to maintain strong ties with their supply chain members and create teams with the key objective of creating contingency plans and reconfiguring resources to face dynamic changes in the market [36]. This helps in reducing the negative impact on society and enhances organisational profitability, as it facilitates waste reduction, increases employment stability and secures a steady source of revenue [19]. Drawing on DC theory and the above discussion, it can be argued that building resilience thus helps organisations to achieve greater sustainability.
AC facilitates boundary spanning and allows organisations to acquire knowledge and process it to their advantage [37]; this is particularly important as needed knowledge (knowledge-related sustainability [38]) might not be owned by organisations [12]. Based on DC theory logic and the important role of AC in applying sustainability practices, it can be argued that AC can facilitate the implementation of sustainable practices.

4. Relationship between SCCDCs and Sustainability through DCs

Eco-friendly industries are growing in developing as well as developed countries; however, Middle Eastern and North African countries are still in their early stages [2]. To further develop sustainability activities, it is essential that organisations inside a cluster work together, which will remove stakeholders’ pressure and sustain their competitive advantage [4]. Since organisations need to frequently enhance, expand and protect their resources through DCs [9], as they are operating in a constantly changing environment [38], it can be argued that building DCs through clustering can help organisations enhance sustainability, especially SCCDCs allow organisations to maintain their operations [28]. On the other hand, AC as a dynamic capability facilitates the acquisition of sustainability-related knowledge [11] and maximise collaboration benefits [39]. In addition, resilience as a dynamic capability allows organisations to maintain high levels of sustainability in a constantly changing environment [12][40]. Based on the above and the underlying logic of ERBV, a unique bundle of resources is required to be collected in order to be able to gain a competitive edge.
Since collaborative efforts of all stakeholders facilitate sustainability development [4][41], it can be argued that SCCDCs facilitate sustainability improvements, especially since they help in cost reduction and enhancing productivity with the lowest waste [42] and cost possible through cost and resource sharing [43]. However, internal capabilities need to be developed so that organisations will be able to acquire and use external resources to create a competitive edge. In this sense, SCCDCs can be used by organisations (subsystems) to collaborate and benefit from the knowledge and resources located in SCC (system), in an effort to enhance their capabilities [27]. In other words, it can be argued that organisations’ DCs can be enhanced through collaboration and integration in a SCC. Then, using their internal enhanced capabilities, resilience and AC, organisations can develop their resources by using available external knowledge and resources to enhance their sustainability levels.

References

  1. Alghababsheh, M.; Gallear, D.; Rahman, M. Balancing the Scales of Justice: Do Perceptions of Buyers’ Justice Drive Suppliers’ Social Performance? J. Bus. Ethics 2020, 163, 125–150.
  2. ElMassah, S. Industrial symbiosis within eco-industrial parks: Sustainable development for Borg El-Arab in Egypt. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2018, 27, 884–892.
  3. Huang, B.; Xue, X. An application analysis of cluster supply chain: A case study of JCH. Kybernetes 2012, 41, 254–280.
  4. Li, W.; Zhang, J.Z.; Ding, R. Impact of Directors’ Network on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from China. J. Bus. Ethics 2022, 183, 551–583.
  5. Tolossa, N.J.; Beshah, B.; Kitaw, D.; Mangano, G.; De Marco, A. A review on the integration of supply chain management and industrial cluster. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2013, 5, 164–174.
  6. Michalski, M.; Montes-Botella, J.-L.; Narasimhan, R. The impact of asymmetry on performance in different collaboration and integration environments in supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2018, 23, 33–49.
  7. Thompson, S.; Valentinov, V. The neglect of society in the theory of the firm: A systems-theory perspective. Camb. J. Econ. 2017, 41, 1061–1085.
  8. Barakat, M.; Tipi, N.; Wu, J. Sustainable supply chain clusters: An integrated framework. Manag. Decis. 2023, 61, 786–814.
  9. Teece, D.J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 2007, 28, 1319–1350.
  10. Geng, L.; Xiao, R.; Xie, S. Research on Self-Organization in Resilient Recovery of Cluster Supply Chains. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2013, 2013, 758967.
  11. Difrancesco, R.M.; Luzzini, D.; Patrucco, A.S. Purchasing realized absorptive capacity as the gateway to sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2022, 42, 603–636.
  12. Riikkinen, R.; Kauppi, K.; Salmi, A. Learning Sustainability? Absorptive capacities as drivers of sustainability in MNCs’ purchasing. Int. Bus. Rev. 2017, 26, 1075–1087.
  13. Brown, N.A.; Feldmann-Jensen, S.; Rovins, J.E.; Orchiston, C.; Johnston, D. Exploring disaster resilience within the hotel sector: A case study of Wellington and Hawke’s Bay New Zealand. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021, 55, 102080.
  14. Salam, M.A.; Bajaba, S. The role of supply chain resilience and absorptive capacity in the relationship between marketing–supply chain management alignment and firm performance: A moderated-mediation analysis. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2022, 38, 1545–1561.
  15. Abeysekara, N.; Wang, H.; Kuruppuarachchi, D. Effect of supply-chain resilience on firm performance and competitive advantage. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2019, 25, 1673–1695.
  16. Tipi, N.S.; Elgazzar, S. Considerations Towards a Sustainable and Resilient Supply Chain: A Modelling Perspective. Int. Bus. Logist. J. 2021, 1, 6–13.
  17. Felipe, C.M.; Roldán, J.L.; Leal-Rodríguez, A.L. An explanatory and predictive model for organizational agility. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 4624–4631.
  18. Martinez-Sanchez, A.; Lahoz-Leo, F. Supply chain agility: A mediator for absorptive capacity. Balt. J. Manag. 2018, 13, 264–278.
  19. Ruiz-Benitez, R.; López, C.; Real, J. Achieving sustainability through the lean and resilient management of the supply chain. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2019, 49, 122–155.
  20. Golicic, S.L.; Flint, D.J.; Signori, P. Building business sustainability through resilience in the wine industry. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2017, 29, 74–97.
  21. Esfahbodi, A.; Zhang, Y.; Watson, G. Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 181, 350–366.
  22. Khan, S.A.R.; Piprani, A.Z.; Yu, Z. Supply chain analytics and post-pandemic performance: Mediating role of triple-A supply chain strategies. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 2023, 18, 1330–1354.
  23. Cordero, P.; Laura Ferreira, J.J. Absorptive capacity and organizational mechanisms: A systematic review and future directions. Rev. Int. Bus. Strategy 2019, 29, 61–82.
  24. Feng, T.; Sheng, H.; Li, M. The bright and dark sides of green customer integration (GCI): Evidence from Chinese manufacturers. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2021, 27, 1610–1632.
  25. Abou Kamar, M.; Albadry, O.M.; Sheikhelsouk, S.; Ali Al-Abyadh, M.H.; Alsetoohy, O. Dynamic Capabilities Influence on the Operational Performance of Hotel Food Supply Chains: A Mediation-Moderation Model. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13562.
  26. Lu, Q.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y. Enhancing supply chain resilience with supply chain governance and finance: The enabling role of digital technology adoption. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2023, 29, 944–964.
  27. Fantazy, K.A.; Tipu, S.A.A.; Kumar, V. Conceptualizing the relative openness of supply chain and its impact on organizational performance. Benchmarking Int. J. 2016, 23, 1264–1285.
  28. Lei, H.-S.; Huang, C.-H. Geographic clustering, network relationships and competitive advantage: Two industrial clusters in Taiwan. Manag. Decis. 2014, 52, 852–871.
  29. Ruiz-Benítez, R.; López, C.; Real, J.C. The lean and resilient management of the supply chain and its impact on performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 203, 190–202.
  30. Lis, A.M.; Rozkwitalska, M. Technological capability dynamics through cluster organizations. Balt. J. Manag. 2020, 15, 587–606.
  31. Roldán Bravo, M.I.; Ruiz Moreno, A.; Garcia Garcia, A.; Huertas-Valdivia, I. How open innovation practices drive innovation performance: Moderated-mediation in the interplay between overcoming syndromes and capabilities. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2022, 37, 366–384.
  32. Migdadi, M.M. Impact of knowledge management processes on organizational performance: The mediating role of absorptive capacity. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2022, 28, 293–322.
  33. Yuan, R.; Luo, J.; Liu, M.J.; Yu, J. Understanding organizational resilience in a platform-based sharing business: The role of absorptive capacity. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 141, 85–99.
  34. Abourokbah, S.H.; Mashat, R.M.; Salam, M.A. Role of Absorptive Capacity, Digital Capability, Agility, and Resilience in Supply Chain Innovation Performance. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3636.
  35. Cho, H.E.; Jeong, I.; Kim, E.; Cho, J. Achieving superior performance in international markets: The roles of organizational agility and absorptive capacity. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2023, 38, 736–750.
  36. Wang, Y.; Ren, J.; Zhang, L.; Liu, D. Research on Resilience Evaluation of Green Building Supply Chain Based on ANP-Fuzzy Model. Sustainability 2023, 15, 285.
  37. Gölgeci, I.; Kuivalainen, O. Does social capital matter for supply chain resilience? The role of absorptive capacity and marketing-supply chain management alignment. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 84, 63–74.
  38. Shubham, C.P.; Murty, L.S. Institutional pressure and the implementation of corporate environment practices: Examining the mediating role of absorptive capacity. J. Knowl. Manag. 2018, 22, 1591–1613.
  39. Singhry, H.B.; Abd Rahman, A. Enhancing supply chain performance through collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2019, 25, 625–646.
  40. Torres-Rivera, A.D.; Mc Namara Valdes, A.D.J.; Florencio Da Silva, R. The Resilience of the Renewable Energy Electromobility Supply Chain: Review and Trends. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10838.
  41. Attia, E.A.; Alarjani, A.; Uddin, M.S.; Kineber, A.F. Determining the Stationary Enablers of Resilient and Sustainable Supply Chains. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3461.
  42. Koren, M.; Pető, R. Business disruptions from social distancing. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239113.
  43. Yuan, X.; Dai, T.; Chen, L.G.; Gavirneni, S. Co-opetition in service clusters with waiting-area entertainment. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2021, 23, 106–122.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Management
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Mahmoud Barakat
,
Jialin Snow Wu
,
Nicoleta Tipi
View Times: 235
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 02 Jan 2024
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback