Metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a recent nomenclature that has been approved to broaden the diagnostic criteria and to avoid stigmatization for a previously known condition called nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
[1], which encompasses a spectrum of liver conditions, ranging from simple fatty liver (hepatic steatosis), which can be detected through imaging or histological methods, to MASH, which involves inflammation and can lead to more severe liver damage
[2]. Currently, characteristics indicative of MASLD have been observed in nearly a quarter of the global population
[3][4], with these prevalence rates showing an upward trend
[5]. This escalating occurrence of MASLD closely mirrors the concurrent rise in obesity and constitutes a significant contributing factor to the expanding burden of chronic hepatic diseases on a worldwide scale
[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. As anticipated, in concurrence with the rising prevalence of MASLD, there has been a significant 2.0–2.5-fold increase in the incidence of MASH in recent years
[4][11] which was robustly linked to liver-related morbidity
[12][13]. Additionally, it is important to highlight that projections indicate that MASH is nearing the position of becoming the second most prevalent causative factor necessitating liver transplantation
[14].
2. Pathophysiological Changes at the Molecular Level in MASLD
Serological studies and numerous genomic studies performed on hepatocytes sourced from patients diagnosed with MASLD and individuals undergoing bariatric surgery consistently reveal a noticeable increase in several biochemical parameters
[15] and the upregulation of key enzymes integral to the de novo lipogenesis (DNL) pathway
[16][17][18][19][20][21]. As a master regulator of the DNL pathway, sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c (SREBP1c), primarily activated by insulin, exhibited a significant increase in MASLD patients compared to those without MASLD
[17][20][22][23][24][25], underscoring its central role in governing this metabolic process. Contrary to these findings, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) combined with computational network analyses to explore lipid signatures in mice with MASLD showed that, despite its traditional role as a driver of lipid synthesis, high SREBP1 expression is not predictive of hepatic lipid accumulation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); instead, the study identifies the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) as a key player in regulating functional modules associated with cholesterol homeostasis, bile acid metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, and estrogen response, demonstrating its correlation with steatohepatitis in human livers
[26]. Notably, among the subsequent enzymes regulated by SREBP1c, the isoforms of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) exhibited a remarkable increase, i.e., a more than eight-fold increase in expression in MASLD patients compared to those with normal liver profiles
[16][17][19].
In addition to an increase in DNL enzyme expression, patients with MASLD also exhibited altered expression of FA binding protein (FABP), FA transport protein (FATP)
[16][17][21][27][28], and CD36
[16][21][28]—genes responsible for FA uptake. Moreover, genes associated with triacylglycerols (TAGs) synthesis, including diacylglycerol o-acyltransferase 2 (DGAT2)
[19] and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP)
[16][17][29], along with genes impacting very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) kinetics, exemplified by apolipoprotein B100 (apoB100)
[16][17][29], exhibited increased expression levels.
Furthermore, genes related to the oxidation of FAs, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ)
[27] and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPT1)
[16][27], were upregulated, while PPAR-γ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) was downregulated
[30]. It is worth noting that Moore et al. reported decreased expression of FA oxidation genes in MASLD patients
[31]. MASH patients, in comparison with MASLD patients, exhibited lower expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPAR-α), MTTP, and apoB100, but no changes were observed in SREBP1c, FASN, DGAT1 and 2, FABP and FATP, and CD36
[32][33][34].
3. Lipid Synthesis in MASLD
3.1. Fatty Acids
As shown in
Figure 1, FA synthesis is a complex biochemical process responsible for the synthesis of FAs, utilizing glycerol and carbon molecules. When FAs are generated from non-lipid sources, notably carbohydrates, this metabolic pathway is termed DNL
[35][36]. Serving as the master regulator, SREBP1c controls the activation of enzymes of the DNL pathway, collectively governing the complex process of FA synthesis at the molecular level through their specific functions. The activation of SREBP-1c has been demonstrated to be regulated by insulin concentrations, with higher insulin levels leading to increased SREBP-1c activation
[22]. At the molecular level, crucial enzymes involved in FA synthesis include ACC, which catalyzes acetyl-CoA carboxylation, a pivotal step in FA synthesis. FASN plays an orchestrating role in the intricate assembly of FAs, ensuring the formation of these essential molecules. SCD-1 is responsible for facilitating desaturation reactions, crucial for modifying FA chains to confer specific properties.