Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Ingrid van Gelderen (Mabin)
 -- 2233 2023-12-21 04:20:21 |
2 layout
Jessie Wu
 + 1 word(s) 2234 2023-12-21 06:14:12 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Van Gelderen (Mabin), I.; Taylor, R. Communication Competency in the Veterinary Curriculum. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53003 (accessed on 21 May 2024).
Van Gelderen (Mabin) I, Taylor R. Communication Competency in the Veterinary Curriculum. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53003. Accessed May 21, 2024.
Van Gelderen (Mabin), Ingrid, Rosanne Taylor. "Communication Competency in the Veterinary Curriculum" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53003 (accessed May 21, 2024).
Van Gelderen (Mabin), I., & Taylor, R. (2023, December 21). Communication Competency in the Veterinary Curriculum. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/53003
Van Gelderen (Mabin), Ingrid and Rosanne Taylor. "Communication Competency in the Veterinary Curriculum." Encyclopedia. Web. 21 December, 2023.
Communication Competency in the Veterinary Curriculum
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ani13233668

Effective communication skills are vital for successful veterinary practice and are a core component of veterinary programs. Veterinary schools design their programs to ensure that all veterinary graduates can demonstrate Day One competencies in clinical communication and provide evidence of this to accrediting bodies. The methods of teaching clinical communication in veterinary medicine have developed since this became a required part of the curriculum over two decades ago, and there is a growing evidence base for their effectiveness.

veterinary communication communication competency simulated consultations contextualised scenarios

1. The Importance of Clinical Communication Skills in the Veterinary Curriculum

The teaching and assessment of communication competency are a necessary inclusion in veterinary school curricula. There is a robust body of evidence demonstrating that a successful and safe graduate transition to practice is associated with communication competency development in health professions, including medicine [1] and veterinary science [2][3]. Veterinary schools around the world no longer view communication competency as an optional inclusion or as a set of skills that are learned by example in the curriculum. This is because these skills are amongst the most highly valued and necessary workplace skills for new graduates [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], and accrediting bodies explicitly require that these competencies be demonstrated by all graduates [22][23][24].
In the packed modern veterinary curriculum, there is a need to explicitly and purposefully embed learning activities and the assessment of communication competency. Explicit communication curriculum frameworks developed from other disciplines such as medicine [25] are widely used as the foundation from which communication skills are taught and assessed in many veterinary curricula [8]. This includes the veterinary curriculum at the University of Sydney, where the skills curriculum has been developed and refined over two decades. With respect to clinical consultation skills (CCSs), the widely accepted framework based on the Guide to the Veterinary Consultation based on the Calgary–Cambridge Model (GVCCCM) [3][8][16] is used to teach and assess CCSs at most veterinary schools in Australia. Clinical consulting skills in a veterinary setting are those behaviours that are demonstrated when undertaking a consultation with a client and include structuring the interaction, developing a rapport and building a relationship, active listening, reflecting, explaining, responding, and concluding with spoken and written interactions. It is expected that the teaching and assessment of CCSs are integrated and sequentially developed within an education program that provides students opportunities to apply these skills in simulated and authentic clinical encounters [26][27][28][29][30]. This is to ensure that students are well prepared to communicate with clients during clinical placements and can demonstrate communication competency at the time of graduation. While the emphasis today is on competency-based education, a review of the medical education literature flags the important link between confidence and competence. With scaffolded experiences and feedback, competency develops over time. As such, activities that enhance students’ confidence contribute to competency development, and, as described in medical education [31], this ultimately helps with a safe transition to professional practice.

2. Evolving Veterinary Curricula

Veterinary curricula at the University of Sydney have been adapted to address the significant impact of technology and client expectations on the role of veterinarians. 
In the early years of the DVM at the University of Sydney, the focus is on pre-clinical areas of study, and in these pre-clinical years, CCSs are first taught and assessed. CCS training should represent current clinical practice so that students can translate these competencies into a workplace context. This includes the use of clinical skills laboratories where students can practice their skills in safe and structured environments. The curricular revisions described in this research have focused on strengthening the ways in which students learn CCSs through their experiences, and this was guided by an evaluation of graduate outcomes. Communication skills training plays a significant role in developing veterinarians’ professional identities [32]. As such, course design needs to include resources and environments that afford students authentic opportunities to learn, practice, receive feedback, and be assessed [3][8][10][26][27][33]. Resources such as case studies or scenarios are widely used in different ways in veterinary curricula. This includes their use as a stimulus in workshop discussions, tutorials, problem-based learning activities, and communication skills training. Authentic opportunities to learn and assess CCSs can range from low-fidelity simulations such as role-plays with case scenarios facilitated in a physical classroom (in a clinical skills laboratory or virtually via videoconference) through to immersion in authentic clinical settings where students are supported and supervised whilst applying their communication skills and knowledge in ways expected for a novice veterinarian. The university’s veterinary teaching services are a major site for these authentic environments, where students’ communication skills are then assessed. These experiences are usually in the context of practicing “gold standard” care or a highly specialised approach to veterinary medicine.
A spectrum of care (SoC) approach has recently been recognised as an essential component of practice readiness that requires specific communication strategies [34][35]. To keep pace with industry standards and community expectations, veterinary schools must provide authentic learning activities that reflect a full range of care options, that is, where there is provision and adaptation of veterinary care that suits clients’ preferences, limitations, and relationship with their pet, for example, through shelter medicine or community clinical services [34][35]. With respect to CCSs, veterinary schools are well placed to design case scenarios that reflect complex clinical presentations across a broad range of species and in situations where communication may be challenging. Situated in an environment where research drives the pursuit of new knowledge and innovative practice, highly specialised veterinary teaching hospitals are equipped to scaffold skill and knowledge development that represents a gold standard of care, including advanced diagnostic and therapeutic services. However, veterinary schools must also spend time and resources on the communications skills required for common presentations and routine cases with accreditation bodies in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand, now requiring a substantial focus on common, entry-level practice [22][24]. In practice, the goal of veterinarians is to provide valued services to meet the needs of clients and the animals in their care. So, while offering the best standard of care available to them, their clients will expect to have a range of options communicated to them and receive guidance in the selection of the treatment plan most appropriate to their needs. Clients may experience significant financial or practical constraints or simply have different priorities in what health care they are able to support for their animals [34][36][37]. As such, it is important for veterinary schools to include the teaching and assessment of communication techniques that help the veterinarian navigate this SoC approach.
Opportunities to apply clinical knowledge and skills in a spectrum of authentic professional practice environments are a critical component of veterinary education programs, and these are most effective when they build students autonomy and decision making in a supported environment. These holistic experiences afford students the opportunity to integrate communication skills with the full range of technical and non-technical competencies expected of a veterinarian. Veterinary schools achieve this in a variety of ways, including the involvement of veterinary teaching hospitals within the university in contracted practices as well as supervised practice with external partners in the industry. This presents a range of challenges, one of which is ensuring that there is vertical alignment between formal teaching and assessment activities and what is then subsequently expected of students when they apply their skills in authentic clinical encounters. Clinical placements in the final years of a veterinary program are recognised to be an effective way to link theory to practice [38]. However, research investigating work-integrated learning environments in other disciplines (health, education, psychology, and law) has shown that aligning authentic assessment activities in this complex context is challenging and problematic [39]. For example, when confronted with an actual clinical case in veterinary practice, information is often incomplete, or the veterinarian is presented with a client that has limited funds or does not have the capacity to understand or adhere to the recommended therapeutic plan. Communication with clients is impacted by the student’s ability to manage time, reach probabilistic decisions, and explain these as they guide the client’s treatment choices. How students experience the practice of communication skills in clinical placements and how well clinical teachers’ and supervisors’ assessment and feedback align with underpinning theoretical frameworks such as the GVCCCM is not well understood and remains an ongoing challenge with respect to consistency in feedback and assessment by clinical teachers and supervisors.
The challenge for veterinary schools is to make sure that curriculum review and renewal reflect industry and community expectations. Over the past 30 years, innovations in the way we communicate have been phenomenal: the general public has access to a vast amount of information via the internet, and they bring this with them to the consultation room; the widespread use of social media impacts the veterinarian–client relationship in varying ways; the role, skills, and daily work of veterinarians are much better understood due to extensive exposure through documentaries on television; telehealth is now widely practiced in human health; and the use of technology has revolutionised the way in which veterinarians record their consultations and communicate with their clients. In sum, clinical communication skills are not static competencies. This was starkly illustrated during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. As universities and veterinary schools grappled with the required shift to online teaching and learning, the same social distancing requirements led to the rapid industry uptake of telehealth consultations. That is, as the teaching and assessment of CCSs moved online, veterinarians were moving to telehealth consultations. This presented a unique opportunity to explore and review the way in which many aspects of the veterinary curriculum were taught and assessed, both in terms of educational value and industry currency.

3. Curriculum Progression of Clinical Consultation Skills at the University of Sydney

Since 2015, at the University of Sydney, CCSs have been formally taught and assessed in the first and second years of the DVM program of study (DVM1 and DVM2). Opportunities to practice, demonstrate competency, and be assessed on these skills are subsequently provided in community spey-neuter clinics in the third year of the DVM (DVM3), in teaching hospitals, and in external placement rotations of final year (DVM4). The formal teaching of CCSs is first integrated into a professional practice Unit of Study (UoS), and this is followed by a series of small workshops in a module that sits within a larger, first-year Professional Skills UoS in the DVM program. Workshops are conducted throughout the first semester in DVM1 and the second semester in DVM2.
In the first year of the DVM program, the formal clinical communication curriculum involves an introductory lecture and a large-group workshop that is then followed by a series of small-group workshops (5–6 students per group). The small-group workshops are facilitated by veterinarians who have recent or current clinical experience. It is intended that the introductory lecture on clinical communication focus on understanding the generic skills required for effective communication as well as describing models for effective clinical consultations. The first large-group workshops (20–24 students per group) take place after the introductory lecture and involve several activities and group discussions. These explore elements of the clinical consultation framework and include activities that examine specific communication skills such as empathy, non-verbal communication, and the use of proxemics when communicating in a consultation. The subsequent small-group workshops involve students conducting simulated consultations as both a veterinarian and a client for a range of common companion animal health issues that include advice on desexing procedures, weight management recommendations, dental care, guidance on rabbit husbandry, and an equine health issue. Students conduct the simulated consultations for a standardised series of cases, and during the workshops, they reflect on their achievement against their own communication SMART goals, that is, goals that are Specific, Measurable, Action-oriented, Realistic, and Time-limited [40]. Students then receive structured feedback from their peers and their facilitator using the GVCCCM framework. At the end of the workshop series, students are allocated an assessment case from one of the health issues that they have been introduced to, and they conduct a simulated consultation with a professional actor taking on the role of a client. The facilitator then assesses student competency based on the core clinical consultation skills that are mapped to the GVCCCM.
In the second year of the DVM program, students’ second professional practice UoS has a focus on some more challenging elements associated with clinical consultations. Students then practice their communication skills and receive feedback in a series of workshops that spotlight more challenging clinical consultations. In these workshops, the standardised cases now focus on issues such as revisit, euthanasia, emergencies, and discharge consultations for complex cases. Hospital teaching placements during Professional Skills UoS in DVM1 and DVM2, pre-clinical placements in DVM3, the community spey-neuter clinic in DVM3, and the final year placements provide students with opportunities to apply their CCSs in authentic clinical encounters that vary based on species and context.

The authors explore the dynamic evolution of CCS education in veterinary medicine since its inception in the DVM curriculum at the University of Sydney. Three key developments are presented, and their implications are critically evaluated. These developments include:

1. Enhancing contextualisation through skills laboratories: a close examination of CCS sessions in DVM1 and DVM2, embracing the spectrum of care approach.

2. Navigating the era of online CCSs: analysing the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on CCSs, with insights into telehealth and future pedagogical implications.

3. Bridging theory and practice: an in-depth evaluation of the application of CCS training in authentic clinical environments throughout the DVM program, tackling the challenge of ‘minding the gap.’

References

  1. Silverman, J.; Kurtz, S.; Draper, J. Skills for Communicating with Patients, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2013.
  2. Cake, M.A.; Bell, M.A.; Williams, J.C.; Brown, F.J.L.; Dozier, M.; Rhind, S.M.; Baillie, S. Which professional (non-technical) competencies are most important to the success of graduate veterinarians? A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 38. Med. Teach. 2016, 38, 550–563.
  3. Hodgson, J.L.; Pelzer, J.M. (Eds.) Veterinary Medical Education: A Practical Guide; Wiley Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017.
  4. Adams, C.L.; Kurtz, S.M. Building on existing models from human medical education to develop a communication curriculum in veterinary medicine. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2006, 33, 28–37.
  5. Gray, C.A.; Blaxter, A.C.; Johnston, P.A.; Latham, C.E.; May, S.; Phillips, C.A.; Turnbull, N.; Yamagishi, B. Communication education in veterinary education in the United Kingdom and Ireland: The NUVACS project coupled to progressive individual school endeavors. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2006, 33, 85–92.
  6. Kurtz, S. Teaching and learning communication in veterinary medicine. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2006, 33, 11–19.
  7. Mills, J.N.; Irwin, P.; Baguley, J.; Meehan, M.; Austin, H.; Fitzpatrick, L.; Parry, B.; Heath, T. Development of Veterinary Communication Skills at Murdoch University and in Other Australian Veterinary Schools. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2006, 33, 93–99.
  8. Radford, A.; Stockley, P.; Silverman, J.; Taylor, I.; Turner, R.; Gray, C.; Bush, L.; Glyde, M.; Healy, A.; Dale, V.; et al. Development, teaching, and evaluation of a consultation structure model for use in veterinary education. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2006, 33, 38–44.
  9. Shaw, D.H.; Ihle, S.L. Communication skills training at the Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2006, 33, 100–104.
  10. Chun, R.; Schaefer, S.; Lotta, C.C.; Banning, J.A.; Skochelak, S.E. Didactic and experiential training to teach communication skills: The University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine collaborative experience. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2009, 36, 196–201.
  11. Rhind, S.M.; Baillie, S.; Kinnison, T.; Shaw, D.J.; Bell, C.E.; Mellanby, R.J.; Hammond, J.; Hudson, N.P.H.; Whittington, R.E.; Donnelly, R. The transition into veterinary practice: Opinions of recent graduates and final year students. BMC Med. Educ. 2011, 11, 64.
  12. Hodgson, J.L.; Pelzer, J.M.; Inzana, K.D. Beyond NAVMEC: Competency-based veterinary education and assessment of the professional competencies. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2013, 40, 102–118.
  13. McDermott, M.P.; Tischler, V.A.; Cobb, M.A.; Robbé, I.J.; Dean, R.S. Veterinarian-client communication skills: Current state, relevance, and opportunities for improvement. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2015, 42, 305–314.
  14. Mossop, L.; Gray, C.; Blaxter, A.; Gardiner, A.; MacEachern, K.; Watson, P.; Whittlestone, K.; Robbé, I. Communication skills training: What the vet schools are doing. Vet. Rec. 2015, 176, 114–117.
  15. Adams, C.L.; Kurtz, S.M.; Bayly, W.; Mülling, C.; Suchman, A. Skills for Communicating in Veterinary Medicine; Otmoor Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2017.
  16. Adams, C.L.; Kurtz, S.M. Chapter 23, Communication. In Veterinary Medical Education: A Practical Guide; Hodgson, J.L., Pelzer, J.M., Eds.; Wiley Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 357–377.
  17. Haldane, S.; Hinchcliff, K.; Mansell, P.; Baik, C. Expectations of graduate communication skills in professional veterinary practice. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2017, 44, 268–279.
  18. Shaw, J.R. Evaluation of communication skills training programs at North American veterinary medical training institutions. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2019, 255, 722–733.
  19. Reinhard, A.R.; Hains, K.D.; Hains, B.J.; Strand, E.B. Are they ready? Trials, tribulations, and professional skills vital for new veterinary graduate success. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 785844.
  20. Russell, E.; Mossop, L.; Forbes, E.; Oxtoby, C. Uncovering the “messy details” of veterinary communication: An analysis of communication problems in cases of alleged professional negligence. Vet. Rec. 2022, 190, e1068.
  21. Bahramsoltani, M.; Bröer, S.; Langforth, S.; Eule, C.; Prior, A.; Vogt, L.; Li, T.-T.; Schirone, R.; Pohl, A.; Jensen, K.C. Outcome of communication training in veterinary studies: Influence on the perception of the relevance of veterinary competencies and self-assessment of communication skills. Animals 2023, 13, 1516.
  22. AVBC. AVBC Day One Competencies. Version 1: January 2024. Australasian Veterinary Boards Council. 2023. Available online: https://avbc.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/AVBC-Day-One-Competencies_Final_2024-v1-Jan-24.pdf (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  23. AVMA. COE Accreditation Policies and Procedures: Requirements: Standard 9, Curriculum and Standard 11, Outcomes Assessment. American Veterinary Medical Association. 2023. Available online: https://www.avma.org/education/center-for-veterinary-accreditation/accreditation-policies-and-procedures-avma-council-education-coe/coe-accreditation-policies-and-procedures-principles (accessed on 20 June 2023).
  24. RCVS. RCVS Standards and Guidance for the Accreditation of Veterinary Degree Programmes. Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. 2023. Available online: https://www.rcvs.org.uk/document-library/rcvs-standards-and-guidance-for-the-accreditation-of-veterinary/ (accessed on 20 June 2023).
  25. Kurtz, S.; Draper, J.; Silverman, J. Teaching and Learning Communication Skills in Medicine, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2016.
  26. Brandt, J.C.; Bateman, S.W. Senior Veterinary Students’ Perceptions of Using role play to learn communication skills. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2006, 33, 76–80.
  27. Barron, D.; Khosa, D.; Jones-Bitton, A. Experiential learning in primary care: Impact on veterinary students’ communication confidence. J. Exp. Educ. 2017, 40, 349–365.
  28. Stevens, B.J.; Kedrowicz, A.A. Evaluation of fourth-year veterinary students’ client communication skills: Recommendations for scaffolded instruction and practice. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2018, 45, 85–90.
  29. Englar, R.E. Tracking veterinary students’ acquisition of communication skills and clinical communication confidence by comparing student Performance in the first and twenty-seventh standardized client encounters. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2019, 46, 235–257.
  30. McDavid, L.; San Miguel, S.F. Using a community engagement program to promote veterinary medicine while helping veterinary students improve their communication skills and increase their cultural understanding and well-being. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2021, 258, 1322–1324.
  31. Gottlieb, M.; Chan, T.M.; Zaver, F.; Ellaway, R. Confidence-competence alignment and the role of self-confidence in medical education: A conceptual review. Med. Educ. 2022, 56, 37–47.
  32. Gaida, S.; Härtl, A.; Tipold, A.; Dilly, M. Communication identity in veterinary medicine: A grounded theory approach. Vet. Rec. Open 2018, 5, e000310.
  33. Hafen, M.; Drake, A.A.S.; Rush, B.R.; Nelson, S.C. Using Authentic Client Interactions in Communication Skills Training: Predictors of Proficiency. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2013, 40, 318–326.
  34. Brown, C.R.; Garrett, L.D.; Gilles, W.K.; Houlihan, K.E.; McCobb, E.; Pailler, S.; Putnam, H.; Scarlett, J.L.; Treglia, L.; Watson, B.; et al. Spectrum of care: More than treatment options. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2021, 259, 712–717.
  35. Fingland, R.B.; Stone, L.R.; Read, E.K.; Moore, R.M. Preparing veterinary students for excellence in general practice: Building confidence and competence by focusing on spectrum of care. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2021, 259, 463–470.
  36. Stull, J.W.; Shelby, J.A.; Bonnett, B.N.; Block, G.; Budsberg, S.C.; Dean, R.S.; Dicks, M.R.; Forsgren, B.W.; Golab, G.C.; Hamil, J.A.; et al. Barriers and next Steps to Providing a Spectrum of Effective Health Care to Companion Animals. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2018, 253, 1386–1389.
  37. Block, G. A new look at Ssandard of care. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2018, 252, 1343–1344.
  38. Baguley, J. The role of final year extramural placements in the undergraduate veterinary curriculum. Aust. Vet. J. 2006, 84, 182–186.
  39. Ajjawi, R.; Tai, J.; Huu Nghia, T.L.; Boud, D.; Johnson, L.; Patrick, C.J. Aligning assessment with the needs of work-integrated learning: The challenges of authentic assessment in a complex context. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2020, 45, 304–316.
  40. Jevring-Bäck, C.; Bäck, E. Managing a Veterinary Practice, 2nd ed.; Elsevier Saunders: Edinburgh, UK, 2007.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Veterinary Sciences
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Ingrid van Gelderen (Mabin)
,
Rosanne Taylor
View Times: 189
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 21 Dec 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback