Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Xinqiao Liu
 -- 1685 2023-11-13 17:21:47 |
2 layout
Jessie Wu
 Meta information modification 1685 2023-11-14 02:59:03 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Cao, X.; Liu, X. Parent‒Child Relationship and Neuroticism and Conscientiousness. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51492 (accessed on 21 July 2024).
Cao X, Liu X. Parent‒Child Relationship and Neuroticism and Conscientiousness. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51492. Accessed July 21, 2024.
Cao, Xiaojie, Xinqiao Liu. "Parent‒Child Relationship and Neuroticism and Conscientiousness" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51492 (accessed July 21, 2024).
Cao, X., & Liu, X. (2023, November 13). Parent‒Child Relationship and Neuroticism and Conscientiousness. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/51492
Cao, Xiaojie and Xinqiao Liu. "Parent‒Child Relationship and Neuroticism and Conscientiousness." Encyclopedia. Web. 13 November, 2023.
Parent‒Child Relationship and Neuroticism and Conscientiousness
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/bs13100876

Conscientiousness and neuroticism, the integral parts of the widely recognized Big Five personality model, play contrasting roles in adolescent mental health. Conscientiousness typically refers to an individual’s tendencies toward diligence, self-discipline, caution and self-control, while neuroticism manifests as emotional traits, such as anxiety, depression, hostility, inhibition and vulnerability. 

parent‒child relationships conscientiousness neuroticism students

1. Introduction

Currently, the rising prevalence of mental health problems among adolescents worldwide is a growing concern and indicates a trend toward younger age cohorts [1][2][3][4]. According to statistics released by the World Health Organization, approximately one in every seven adolescents between the ages of 10 and 19 suffers from mental health problems [5]. A recent meta-analysis study of 96,000 adolescents from 11 countries found that almost 90% of the 21 studies covering 23 indicators of anxiety, depression and general mental health exhibited an upward trend. This suggests a significant escalation in the severity of negative emotions and mental health problems among adolescents [6]. Specifically, a national social survey conducted in Iceland found that between 2016 and 2020, the proportion of 13-year-old Icelandic adolescents with depression symptoms increased from 16.52% to 18.72%, while mental well-being decreased from 25.21% to 23.13% [1]. Some studies have also highlighted the exacerbation of adolescent mental health problems due to prolonged home confinement and deteriorating family dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic [7]. For instance, the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms in Chinese adolescents increased significantly from 36.6% to 57.0% and from 19% to 36.7%, respectively, leading to a significant increase in the risk of emotional dysregulation [8].
Conscientiousness serves as a protective factor in mitigating the impact of negative emotions on adolescents. Adolescents with high levels of conscientiousness are more likely to exhibit positive psychological traits, such as emotional stability, self-management skills and effective coping strategies [9][10][11][12]. Conversely, neuroticism has long-term detrimental effects on individual development, including reduced quality of life, poorer health, increased frequency of experiencing unpleasant events and a potentially shortened life span. Individuals with higher levels of neuroticism are more likely to experience negative emotions, show symptoms of depression and anxiety, and suffer from mental health problems [13][14][15][16][17]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify the key factors for preventing the exacerbation of neuroticism in adolescents and fostering conscientiousness development to effectively reduce the occurrence of negative emotions, promote adolescent mental health and facilitate holistic development.
It is worth noting that adolescence is a critical period for individual development and personality formation [3][4][9][18], where the parent‒child relationship is considered a key factor, which may influence adolescent development and mental health [19][20][21][22]. The parent‒child relationship encompasses the emotional, communicative and interactive aspects between children and their parents. The ecological systems theory posits that parents are not only the earliest socializing agents for individuals but also play a crucial role in the microsystem of the family [23]. In China in particular, early attachment formation is influenced by long-standing family-oriented values. The impact of the parent‒child relationships formed by the emphasis on shared parenting in everyday life cannot be overlooked in individual development. According to the stress-buffering model, social support or positive relationships with others can mitigate the potentially detrimental impacts of stressful events [24]. In the context of the family environment, the support and warmth derived from close parent‒child relationships may help alleviate the stress, which adolescents encounter in school or peer relationships. However, further empirical research is necessary to validate these assumptions. Previous research has focused on the influence of parent‒child relationships on adolescent aggression, maladaptive behaviors, social–emotional difficulties and general levels of mental health [25][26][27][28], but specific investigations of their effects on the development of conscientiousness and neuroticism are lacking. In reality, early adolescence marks a critical juncture characterized by physiological changes, academic adjustment and peer pressure, leading to crises and an urgent need for attention in parent‒child relationships [29]. On the one hand, as individuals in adolescence increasingly yearn for independence and seek autonomy, attachment to parents diminishes with age, resulting in more arguments and fewer opportunities for parent‒child communication [10][11][27][30]. On the other hand, in countries such as China, with limited educational resources and intense competition, parents have high expectations for their children’s education and often demand outstanding academic performance, which puts enormous pressure on children [31][32] and hinders the establishment of harmonious parent‒child relationships. Similarly, in the case of Bangladeshi middle school students, a mixed-methods study reveals that parents willingly bear significant financial burdens to enroll their children in extracurricular tutoring in order to enhance academic competitiveness. This places considerable demand on the students, who have to cope with a heavy academic workload even in their leisure time, sacrificing adequate rest and leading to profound psychological stress [33]. A study of Canadian adolescents further found that parent–child relationships tend to become rigid, especially when parents impose unrealistic educational expectations, increasing students’ vulnerability to self-injury behaviors [34]. The evidence from German fifth graders suggests that positive parent–child relationships and parental understanding of real needs are essential prerequisites for promoting children’s psychological well-being [35]. Therefore, it is important to understand the current status of parent‒child relationships among middle school students and their role in the development of conscientiousness and neuroticism.

2. Parent‒Child Relationship and Neuroticism

Previous literature has extensively discussed the influence of parent‒child relationships on adolescent neuroticism, but there is little evidence on the influence of neuroticism on parent‒child relationships. In an autobiographical review of the risk factors for depression, Hammen (2018) suggests that experiences of rejection, exclusion and conflict in interpersonal relationships, particularly parent‒child relationships, can shape negative cognitive patterns and self-evaluations, leading to higher levels of depression risk [36]. Warm parent‒child relationships can act as a protective factor against the negative effects of stress [37]. Meanwhile, some empirical studies have focused on the relationship between parent‒child relationships and adolescent mental health, particularly negative emotional traits, but most of them have found only correlational relationships. For instance, Li et al. (2020) used cross-sectional data to show a positive correlation between improved parent‒child relationships and better mental health among Chinese middle school students [27]. A study involving 234 British adolescents aged approximately 18 found a significant negative correlation between parent‒child relationships and adolescent neuroticism [38]. Another study of public high school students in New York revealed that a lack of intimacy with parents was associated with a higher degree of depressive mood [39]. The evidence from a study of 847 Israeli adolescents showed that adolescents with more intimate parental relationships experienced less distress, higher levels of happiness and more social support [22]. In addition, previous literature has analyzed the unidirectional predictive relationship between parent‒child relationships and neuroticism. For example, a longitudinal study of nearly 700 adolescents from New Jersey and Colorado found that high levels of parent‒child bonding (i.e., closer parent‒child relationships) could protect adolescents from the negative effects of peer stressors and reduce depressive symptoms [29]. A survey of 290 European–American adolescents found that warm parental behaviors significantly predicted an increase in adolescent optimism and a decrease in neuroticism levels [19]. A one-year longitudinal study involving a sample of 418 participants found that the quality of parent‒child relationships in eighth grade significantly predicted depressive mood in ninth grade [40]. However, these studies have limitations, such as insufficient representativeness of the sample and lack of generalizability of the conclusions [38]. As mentioned earlier, given the importance of measuring the quality of parent‒child relationships, it is necessary to examine the bidirectional relationship between the closeness level of parent‒child relationships and adolescent neuroticism. Unfortunately, previous research has rarely investigated the dynamic relationship between these two variables over time, and in particular, empirical evidence on the influence of neuroticism on parent‒child relationships is lacking [10]. This is the gap, which the current study aims to address and analyze.

3. Parent‒Child Relationships and Conscientiousness

There is currently limited direct research on the bidirectional relationship between parent‒child relationships and conscientiousness development, although most of the literature suggests a potential positive correlation between these two variables. For example, a survey of nearly 1000 Chinese primary school students confirmed the role of family environmental factors in shaping conscientiousness, revealing a significant positive correlation between parent‒child relationships and children’s levels of conscientiousness [41]. Another study of some 750 people in the community also found a significant positive correlation between parent‒child relationships and conscientiousness, with respondents reporting lower scores in conscientiousness among those who reported lower levels of parental care and higher levels of parental intrusiveness [42]. As an essential component of the family ecological environment, the parent‒child relationship has a positive impact on individual adjustment. Compared with unhealthy and negative parent‒child relationships, close and positive parent‒child relationships can facilitate the development of individual adaptive abilities [29]. Additionally, some studies have examined the association between parental nurturing behaviors, family environmental characteristics and adolescent conscientiousness, reflecting to some extent how positive parent‒child relationships contribute to the development of adolescent conscientiousness. A survey conducted among 674 participants aged 18 to 28 from three universities in Slovenia revealed a negative correlation between conscientiousness and perceived parental intrusiveness and fear of disappointment from mothers, suggesting that individuals with lower levels of conscientiousness may have poorer relationships with their parents [10]. Studies conducted in Serbia and Germany found a positive correlation between adult conscientiousness and a supportive family environment in childhood [12]. A survey of 402 adolescents aged 14 to 21 found significant positive correlations between conscientiousness (including resilience) and both mother support and father support [43]. Although a study of 287 Dutch families also found an association between the quality of the parent‒child relationship and conscientiousness, the association was relatively weak [44]. Furthermore, a meta-analysis conducted by Prinzie et al. (2009) found that higher levels of conscientiousness and lower levels of neuroticism in parents were associated with greater warmth and behavioral control, while lower levels of neuroticism were associated with greater autonomy support. However, it is important to note that focused on parents as subjects, whereas in reality, as the recipients of education, children’s personality traits and their development also deserve attention [21]. In summary, there is currently a lack of literature based on longitudinal data, which reveals the bidirectional relationship between parent‒child relationships and conscientiousness, and empirical analysis is needed to provide new evidence. The existing research mainly focuses on Western countries and includes a wide age range, making it difficult to directly apply the conclusions to the adolescent population in the Chinese context. 

References

  1. Thorisdottir, I.E.; Asgeirsdottir, B.B.; Kristjansson, A.L.; Valdimarsdottir, H.B.; Tolgyes, E.M.J.; Sigfusson, J.; Allegrante, J.P.; Sigfusdottir, I.D.; Halldorsdottir, T. Depressive symptoms, mental wellbeing, and substance use among adolescents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iceland: A longitudinal, population-based study. Lancet Psychiatry 2021, 8, 663–672.
  2. Collishaw, S. Annual Research Review: Secular Trends in Child and Adolescent Mental Health. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatr. 2015, 56, 370–393.
  3. Thapar, A.; Collishaw, S.; Pine, D.S.; Thapar, A.K. Depression in adolescence. Lancet 2012, 379, 1056–1067.
  4. Mojtabai, R.; Olfson, M. National Trends in Mental Health Care for US Adolescents. JAMA Psychiatry 2020, 77, 703–714.
  5. WHO. Mental Health of Adolescents. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-health (accessed on 17 November 2021).
  6. Kauhanen, L.; Yunus, W.; Lempinen, L.; Peltonen, K.; Gyllenberg, D.; Mishina, K.; Gilbert, S.; Bastola, K.; Brown, J.S.L.; Sourander, A. A systematic review of the mental health changes of children and young people before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2023, 32, 995–1013.
  7. Craig, S.G.; Ames, M.E.; Bondi, B.C.; Pepler, D.J. Canadian Adolescents’ Mental Health and Substance Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Associations With COVID-19 Stressors. Can. J. Behav. Sci. Rev. Can. Des Sci. Du Comport. 2023, 55, 46–55.
  8. Chen, X.; Qi, H.; Liu, R.; Feng, Y.; Li, W.; Xiang, M.; Cheung, T.; Jackson, T.; Wang, G.; Xiang, Y.T. Depression, anxiety and associated factors among Chinese adolescents during the COVID-19 outbreak: A comparison of two cross-sectional studies. Transl. Psychiatry 2021, 11, 148.
  9. Smith, K.A.; Barstead, M.G.; Rubin, K.H. Neuroticism and Conscientiousness as Moderators of the Relation Between Social Withdrawal and Internalizing Problems in Adolescence. J. Youth Adolesc. 2017, 46, 772–786.
  10. Zupancic, M.; Kavcic, T. Student personality traits predicting individuation in relation to mothers and fathers. J. Adolesc. 2014, 37, 715–726.
  11. Wangqvist, M.; Lamb, M.E.; Frisen, A.; Hwang, C.P. Child and Adolescent Predictors of Personality in Early Adulthood. Child Dev. 2015, 86, 1253–1261.
  12. Milovanovic, I.; Mitrovic, D.; Branovacki, B.; Sadikovic, S.; Riemann, R.; Kodzopeljic, J. Personality traits and perception of parenting: The comparative twin study from Germany and Serbia. Int. J. Psychol. 2023, 58, 396–405.
  13. Lee, S.A.; Callan, S.M.; Gibbons, J.A. School and religious factors impact the neuroticism-grief link in adolescents. Death Stud. 2016, 40, 601–606.
  14. Tananuvat, N.; Tansanguan, S.; Wongpakaran, N.; Wongpakaran, T. Role of neuroticism and perceived stress on quality of life among patients with dry eye disease. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 7079.
  15. Muir, K.; Madill, A.; Brown, C. Reflective rumination mediates the effects of neuroticism upon the fading affect bias in autobiographical memory. Self Identity 2023, 22, 102–128.
  16. Lahey, B.B. Public Health Significance of Neuroticism. Am. Psychol. 2009, 64, 241–256.
  17. Heaven, P.C.L.; Mulligan, K.; Merrilees, R.; Woods, T.; Fairooz, Y. Neuroticism and conscientiousness as predictors of emotional, external, and restrained eating behaviors. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2001, 30, 161–166.
  18. Watson, P.W.S.J.; Sotardi, V.A.; Park, J.J.; Roy, D. Gender Self-confidence, Scholastic Stress, Life Satisfaction, and Perceived Academic Achievement for Adolescent New Zealanders. J. Adolesc. 2021, 88, 120–133.
  19. Yu, J.; Putnick, D.L.; Hendricks, C.; Bornstein, M.H. Long-Term Effects of Parenting and Adolescent Self-Competence for the Development of Optimism and Neuroticism. J. Youth Adolesc. 2019, 48, 1544–1554.
  20. Morgan, Z.; Brugha, T.; Fryers, T.; Stewart-Brown, S. The effects of parent-child relationships on later life mental health status in two national birth cohorts. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2012, 47, 1707–1715.
  21. Prinzie, P.; Stams, G.; Dekovic, M.; Reijntjes, A.H.A.; Belsky, J. The Relations Between Parents’ Big Five Personality Factors and Parenting: A Meta-Analytic Review. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2009, 97, 351–362.
  22. Canetti, L.; Bachar, E.; Galili-Weisstub, E.; De-Nour, A.K.; Shalev, A.Y. Parental bonding and mental health in adolescence. Adolescence 1997, 32, 381–394.
  23. Bronfenbrenner, U.; Ceci, S.J. Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychol. Rev. 1994, 101, 568–586.
  24. Cohen, S.; Wills, T.A. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol. Bull. 1985, 98, 310–357.
  25. O’Brien, F.; Nixon, E.; Hadfield, K. Effects of Preterm Birth and Parent-Child Relationships on Socioemotional Difficulties, Verbal Ability, and Numerical Ability among Older Children and Young Adolescents. Dev. Psychol. 2022, 59, 745.
  26. Conger, R.D.; Wallace, L.E.; Sun, Y.M.; Simons, R.L.; McLoyd, V.C.; Brody, G.H. Economic pressure in African American families: A replication and extension of the family stress model. Dev. Psychol. 2002, 38, 179–193.
  27. Li, C.K.; Jiang, S.; Fan, X.Y.; Zhang, Q.N. Exploring the impact of marital relationship on the mental health of children: Does parent-child relationship matter? J. Health Psychol. 2020, 25, 1669–1680.
  28. Sher, L. Parental Alienation and Suicide in Men. Psychiatr. Danub. 2015, 27, 288–289.
  29. Hazel, N.A.; Oppenheimer, C.W.; Technow, J.R.; Young, J.F.; Hankin, B.L. Parent Relationship Quality Buffers Against the Effect of Peer Stressors on Depressive Symptoms From Middle Childhood to Adolescence. Dev. Psychol. 2014, 50, 2115–2123.
  30. Brumariu, L.E.; Kerns, K.A. Parent-child attachment and internalizing symptoms in childhood and adolescence: A review of empirical findings and future directions. Dev. Psychopathol. 2010, 22, 177–203.
  31. Cao, X.J.; Liu, X.Q. Time Use and Cognitive Achievement among Adolescents in China: Depression Symptoms as Mediators. J. Intell. 2023, 11, 88.
  32. Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, X.; Gao, W. Does anxiety consistently affect the achievement goals of college students? A four-wave longitudinal investigation from China. Curr. Psychol. 2023, 1–14.
  33. Mahmud, R. Learning in the shadows: Parents’ investments, family burden, and students’ workload in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2021, 22, 41–52.
  34. Guérin-Marion, C.; Bureau, J.-F.; Gareau, A.; Lafontaine, M.-F.; Gaudreau, P. Parental pressure and intrapersonal risk factors in relation to non-suicidal self-injury outcomes in university students. Curr. Psychol. 2022, 1–17.
  35. Obermeier, R.; Schlesier, J.; Gläser-Zikuda, M. Differences in students’ scholastic well-being induced by familial and scholastic context. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2021, 92, 994–1010.
  36. Hammen, C. Risk Factors for Depression: An Autobiographical Review. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2018, 14, 1–28.
  37. Cummings, E.M.; Schatz, J.N. Family Conflict, Emotional Security, and Child Development: Translating Research Findings into a Prevention Program for Community Families. Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev. 2012, 15, 14–27.
  38. Cheng, H.; Furnham, A. Personality, self-esteem, and demographic predictions of happiness and depression. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2003, 34, 921–942.
  39. Kandel, D.B.; Davies, M. Epidemiology of depressive mood in adolescents: An empirical study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1982, 39, 1205–1212.
  40. Brouillard, C.; Brendgen, M.; Vitaro, F.; Dionne, G.; Boivin, M. Links Between the Mother-Adolescent and Father-Adolescent Relationships and Adolescent Depression: A Genetically Informed Study. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 2018, 47, S397–S408.
  41. Zhang, D.J.; Zhou, Z.K.; Gu, C.H.; Lei, Y.J.; Fan, C.Y. Family Socio-Economic Status and Parent-Child Relationships Are Associated with the Social Creativity of Elementary School Children: The Mediating Role of Personality Traits. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2018, 27, 2999–3007.
  42. Reti, I.M.; Samuels, J.F.; Eaton, W.W.; Bienvenu, O.J.; Costa, P.T.; Nestadt, G. Influences of parenting on normal personality traits. Psychiatry Res. 2002, 111, 55–64.
  43. O’Connor, B.P.; Dvorak, T. Conditional Associations between Parental Behavior and Adolescent Problems: A Search for Personality– Environment Interactions. J. Res. Personal. 2001, 35, 1–26.
  44. Denissen, J.J.A.; van Aken, M.A.G.; Dubas, J.S. It Takes Two to Tango: How Parents’ and Adolescents’ Personalities Link to the Quality of Their Mutual Relationship. Dev. Psychol. 2009, 45, 928–941.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Psychology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Xiaojie Cao
,
Xinqiao Liu
View Times: 196
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 14 Nov 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback