Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1170 2023-10-20 00:43:40 |
2 format change Meta information modification 1170 2023-10-20 04:52:55 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Su, Z.; Xian, K.; Lu, D.; Wang, W.; Zheng, Y.; Khotphat, T. Sustainable Livelihoods and Tourism Seasonality. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/50586 (accessed on 06 July 2024).
Su Z, Xian K, Lu D, Wang W, Zheng Y, Khotphat T. Sustainable Livelihoods and Tourism Seasonality. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/50586. Accessed July 06, 2024.
Su, Zhen, Kun Xian, Dandan Lu, Wenhui Wang, Yinghong Zheng, Tanaporn Khotphat. "Sustainable Livelihoods and Tourism Seasonality" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/50586 (accessed July 06, 2024).
Su, Z., Xian, K., Lu, D., Wang, W., Zheng, Y., & Khotphat, T. (2023, October 20). Sustainable Livelihoods and Tourism Seasonality. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/50586
Su, Zhen, et al. "Sustainable Livelihoods and Tourism Seasonality." Encyclopedia. Web. 20 October, 2023.
Sustainable Livelihoods and Tourism Seasonality
Edit

Local governments often integrate rural communities with tourism development to alleviate poverty and promote sustainable development. The inherent vulnerability of tourism poses a substantial challenge to maintaining the productivity and stability of livelihoods among rural tourism households.

rural tourism tourism seasonality sustainable livelihood

1. Introduction

Local governments often integrate rural communities with tourism development to alleviate poverty and promote sustainable development [1][2]. Such efforts have reshaped the livelihood activities of rural households, creating new opportunities and uncertainties [3][4][5]. Since the development of tourism in rural areas has been emphasized as the embedding of tourism in rural communities [6], related studies have mainly discussed the transformation of traditional livelihoods into tourism livelihoods [7][8][9][10]. However, rather than a process from A to B, transforming rural households’ livelihood strategies is a continual positive adjustment to changing environments and circumstances, ultimately leading to livelihood diversification [11]. As a determinant of livelihood diversification, seasonality significantly impacts the livelihood strategies chosen by rural households [12]. Depending on their specific endowment of resources, rural households adopt different combinations of livelihood strategies to reduce the adverse effects of seasonality on their annual income [13]. In rural communities deeply integrated with tourism, the tourism livelihood strategy has become a vital livelihood strategy employed by many rural households [14]. Consequently, seasonal fluctuations in tourism activities result in the discontinuity of livelihood strategies for rural households involved in the tourism industry (hereinafter referred to as rural tourism households) [15], prompting them to seek complementary and alternative livelihood strategies [16]. This transformation in livelihood strategies brings about a rhythmic combination of traditional and tourism livelihoods over time, subsequently affecting livelihood outcomes [17]. Although sustainable tourism livelihoods in the research field of rural tourism have been widely discussed, there remains a shortage of empirical research investigating the transformation of livelihood strategies in the context of tourism seasonality as well as combinations of livelihood strategies that can improve the livelihood outcomes of rural tourism households.

2. Sustainable Livelihood

Chambers and Conway (1991) proposed a sustainable livelihood approach for addressing rural poverty in which livelihoods are sustainable when they can adapt to and recover from external risks while enhancing capabilities without compromising natural environmental resources and development opportunities for future generations [18]. To develop a systematic paradigm for sustainable livelihood research, the Department for International Development (DFID) developed a widely recognized framework for sustainable livelihood analysis. This framework places people at the center of the study, considers the fundamental changes in the scale and structure of livelihood capital of subjects under the influence of vulnerability contexts, and selects appropriate livelihood strategies to respond to transforming structures and processes to achieve the goal of livelihood outcomes [11].
In peripheral areas, tourism is perceived not only as a development tool but also as a sustainable livelihood approach that can improve the livelihood of rural households and their adaptive capacity in a vulnerable context [14]. Existing studies on sustainable livelihoods in tourism often use the DFID sustainable livelihood framework for analysis, which examines the interrelationships among livelihood capital, livelihood strategies, and livelihood outcomes, including the evaluation of capitals, strategy transformations, and differences in outcomes attributed to different strategies [19][20][21][22]. Among these, livelihood strategies, which are at the core of rural household responses to external changes, have garnered significant attention [9][23][24]. Livelihood strategies encompass the choices and combinations of activities adopted by rural households to achieve their livelihood objectives, such as production and investment [11]. In the context of tourism as an external force, rural households’ livelihood strategies can be broadly categorized into tourism and non-tourism types [10]. Scholars argue that tourism strategies can enhance sustainability and therefore encourage rural households to actively choose these strategies for improved livelihood outcomes [3][25]. Some even claim that earning income through tourism livelihood strategies is more advantageous than other types of livelihood activities and that specialized tourism livelihood is a sustainable “developmental pattern” [26]. However, tourism livelihoods are subject to seasonal variations and unexpected events, which may lead to potential volatility and uncertainty in relying solely on tourism [27]. Therefore, diversifying livelihoods by combining both tourism and traditional strategies over different periods and locations is an effective measure to mitigate livelihood risks [6][17].
Livelihood diversification refers to the process through which rural households build a varied range of activities and social support systems to enhance their standard of living and resilience to livelihood risks [15]. Most scholars categorize rural households’ livelihood diversification according to the proportion of income obtained from farming, labor, and tourism activities in their overall household incomes [28][29]. They then used descriptive statistical analysis to compare the differences in livelihood outcomes attributable to each strategy [9][30]. These studies affirm the positive impact of tourism livelihood diversification on rural household sustainability. Nonetheless, livelihood diversification extends beyond mere income diversification; it also entails broadening the range of available options and opportunities, highlighting the significance of flexibility [25][27][31][32]. This aspect becomes particularly critical during seasonal shifts as individual livelihood diversification manifests in the short-term, flexible, and ongoing selection of various livelihood strategies [31].

3. Tourism Seasonality

While tourism development in rural communities has led to improvements in livelihood capital and the diversification of livelihood strategies for rural households, the inherent uncertainties of the tourism industry, particularly tourism seasonality, also present challenges to the livelihoods of households [33][34]. Tourism seasonality refers to the temporary imbalance between demand and supply over time, primarily characterized by fluctuations in critical factors such as the number of tourists, employment, and prices [35]. Seasonality in tourism is influenced by natural and institutional factors [36][37]. Natural seasonality results from cyclical variations in natural phenomena such as temperature and precipitation [36][38], which are particularly pronounced in remote and peripheral areas [39]. Institutional seasonality arises from fluctuations in social norms and customs, such as holidays, which significantly impact tourism seasonality [40][41]. Some scholars argue that tourism seasonality has potential benefits, including providing tourism practitioners with the opportunity to repair equipment [42], as well as facilitating ecological restoration [35][43] and capitalizing on seasonally inexpensive labor [44]. However, seasonality is often considered a negative factor in tourism development as it places considerable pressure on the sustainability of the tourism industry [45]. For instance, seasonal fluctuations can result in unstable employment relationships, leading to seasonal employment and hidden unemployment among tourism practitioners [46]. Furthermore, tourism practitioners must take advantage of the brief peak season to secure sufficient capital to ensure year-round business income. This discontinuity in income generation may compel practitioners to seek alternative income sources [46].
To mitigate the adverse effects of seasonal uncertainty, most studies recommend demand regulation strategies for tourism firms or destinations [6]. These strategies can be broadly categorized into product and market diversification [47]. Product diversification entails offering a wide range of tourism products, particularly during the off-season, to stimulate sluggish demand [48]. Market diversification involves reducing the risk of reliance on a single market by expanding and targeting new markets [45]. Nevertheless, tourism practitioners in remote and peripheral areas, especially those from rural households with limited resources and expertise [49], often face challenges in effectively responding to seasonal shocks through the mentioned strategies. Consequently, rural tourism households can only adjust their lifestyles and livelihoods when confronted with seasonality [6]. Su et al. (2019) examined the livelihood strategies of various rural households during low- and high-tourism seasons, emphasizing the need for increased attention to seasonality in sustainable livelihood studies [34].

References

  1. Mowforth, M.; Munt, I. Tourism and Sustainability: Development, Globalisation and New Tourism in the Third World; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2015.
  2. Li, M.; Wu, B.; Cai, L. Tourism development of World Heritage Sites in China: A geographic perspective. Tour. Manag. 2008, 29, 308–319.
  3. Su, M.M.; Wall, G.; Wang, S.G. Yujiale fishing tourism and island development in Changshan Archipelago, Changdao, China. Isl. Stud. J. 2017, 12, 127–142.
  4. Qin, R.J.; Leung, H.H. Becoming a traditional village: Heritage protection and livelihood transformation of a Chinese village. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2331.
  5. Mbaiwa, J.E. Changes on traditional livelihood activities and lifestyles caused by tourism development in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Tour. Manag. 2011, 32, 1050–1060.
  6. Rongna, A.; Sun, J.X. Integration and sustainability of tourism and traditional livelihood: A rhythmanalysis. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 455–474.
  7. Ashley, C. The Impacts of Tourism on Rural Livelihoods: Namibia’s Experience; Overseas Development Institute: London, UK, 2000.
  8. Huang, L.; Yang, L.; Thị Tuyến, N.; Colmekcioglu, N.; Liu, J. Factors influencing the livelihood strategy choices of rural households in tourist destinations. J. Sustain. Tour. 2022, 30, 875–896.
  9. Peng, W.; Zheng, H.; Robinson, B.E.; Li, C.; Wang, F. Household Livelihood Strategy Choices, Impact Factors, and Environmental Consequences in Miyun Reservoir Watershed, China. Sustainability 2017, 9, 12.
  10. Tao, T.C.H.; Wall, G. Tourism as a sustainable livelihood strategy. Tour. Manag. 2009, 30, 90–98.
  11. United Kingdom Department for International Development. Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets; DFID: London, UK, 1999; Volume 445.
  12. Ellis, F. The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. J. Agric. Econ. 2000, 51, 289–302.
  13. Devereux, S.; Sabates-Wheeler, R.; Longhurst, R. Seasonality, Rural Livelihoods and Development; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2013.
  14. Shen, F.; Hughey, K.F.D.; Simmons, D.G. Connecting the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach and Tourism: A Review of the Literature. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2008, 15, 19–31.
  15. Ellis, F. Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. J. Dev. Stud. 1998, 35, 1–38.
  16. Lasso, A.; Dahles, H. Are tourism livelihoods sustainable? Tourism development and economic transformation on Komodo Island, Indonesia. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2018, 23, 473–485.
  17. Rongna, A.; Sun, J. Tourism livelihood transition and rhythmic sustainability: The case of the Reindeer Evenki in China. Ann. Tour. Res. 2022, 94, 103381.
  18. Chambers, R.; Conway, G.R. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century; International Water Management Institute: Colombo, Sri Lanka, 1991.
  19. Burbano, D.V.; Meredith, T.C. Effects of tourism growth in a UNESCO World Heritage Site: Resource-based livelihood diversification in the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021, 29, 1270–1289.
  20. Qian, C.; Sasaki, N.; Jourdain, D.; Kim, S.M.; Shivakoti, P.G. Local livelihood under different governances of tourism development in China—A case study of Huangshan mountain area. Tour. Manag. 2017, 61, 221–233.
  21. Ma, X.; Wang, R.; Dai, M.; Ou, Y. The influence of culture on the sustainable livelihoods of households in rural tourism destinations. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021, 29, 1235–1252.
  22. Tao, T.C.-H. Tourism as a Livelihood Strategy in Indigenous Communities: Case Studies from Taiwan. Ph.D Thesis, Univesity of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, USA, 2006.
  23. Su, M.M.; Wall, G.; Wang, Y. Integrating tea and tourism: A sustainable livelihoods approach. J. Sustain. Tour. 2019, 27, 1591–1608.
  24. Iorio, M.; Corsale, A. Rural tourism and livelihood strategies in Romania. J. Rural. Stud. 2010, 26, 152–162.
  25. Jamal, K.; Banafsheh, N. The Effects of Rural Tourism on Sustainable Livelihoods (Case Study: Lavij Rural, Iran). Mod. Appl. Sci. 2016, 10, 10–22.
  26. Xi, J.; Zhang, N. An analysis of the sustainable livelihood of tourism households: A case study in Gougezhuang village, Yesanpo tourism area. Tour. Trib. 2016, 31, 65–75.
  27. Mbaiwa, J.E.; Stronza, A.L. The effects of tourism development on rural livelihoods in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. J. Sustain. Tour. 2010, 18, 635–656.
  28. Ellis, F.; Mdoe, N. Livelihoods and rural poverty reduction in Tanzania. World Dev. 2003, 31, 1367–1384.
  29. Alemu, Z.G. Livelihood Strategies in Rural South Africa: Implications for Poverty Reduction; International Association of Agricultural Economists: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2012.
  30. Huang, T.; Xi, J.C.; Ge, Q.S. Livelihood differentiation between two villages in Yesanpo Tourism District in China. J. Mt. Sci. 2017, 14, 2359–2372.
  31. Turner, S. Trading old textiles: The selective diversification of highland livelihoods in northern Vietnam. Hum. Organ. 2007, 66, 389–404.
  32. Su, M.M.; Wall, G.; Wang, Y.; Jin, M. Livelihood sustainability in a rural tourism destination—Hetu Town, Anhui Province, China. Tour. Manag. 2019, 71, 272–281.
  33. Su, Z.; Wen, R.; Zeng, Y.; Ye, K.; Khotphat, T. The Influence of Seasonality on the Sustainability of Livelihoods of Households in Rural Tourism Destinations. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10572.
  34. Su, Z.; Aaron, J.R.; Guan, Y.; Wang, H. Sustainable Livelihood Capital and Strategy in Rural Tourism Households: A Seasonality Perspective. Sustainability 2019, 11, 14.
  35. Butler, R. Seasonality in Tourism: Issues and Problems. In Tourism: The State of the Art; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 1994; pp. 332–339.
  36. Baron, R.R.V. Seasonality in Tourism: A Guide to the Analysis of Seasonality and Trends for Policy Making; Economist Intelligence Unit: London, UK, 1975.
  37. Rudihartmann. Tourism, seasonality and social change. Leis. Stud. 1986, 5, 25–33.
  38. Williams, A.M.; Shaw, G. Tourism and Economic Development: Western European Experiences; Belhaven Press: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1991.
  39. Martin, J.M.M.; Fernandez, J.A.S.; Martin, J.A.R.; Rey, M.S.O. Analysis of Tourism Seasonality as a Factor Limiting the Sustainable Development of Rural Areas. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2020, 44, 45–75.
  40. Rossello, J.; Sanso, A. Yearly, monthly and weekly seasonality of tourism demand: A decomposition analysis. Tour. Manag. 2017, 60, 379–389.
  41. Hinch, T.; Hickey, G. Tourism Attractions and Seasonality: Spatial Relationships in Alberta; Canadian Chapter; Travel and Tourism Research Association: Lapeer, MI, USA, 1997; pp. 69–76.
  42. Grant, M.; Human, B.; Le Pelley, B. Seasonality. In Insights-Tourism Intelligence Papers; British Tourist Authority & English Tourist Bord: London, UK, 1997; Volume 9, pp. 5–9.
  43. Higham, J.; Hinch, T. Tourism, sport and seasons: The challenges and potential of overcoming seasonality in the sport and tourism sectors. Tour. Manag. 2002, 23, 175–185.
  44. Mourdoukoutas, P. Seasonal employment, seasonal unemployment and unemployment compensation: The case of the tourist industry of the Greek islands. Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 1988, 47, 315–329.
  45. Lee, C.; Bergin-Sees, S.; Galloway, G.; O’Mahony, G.B. Seasonality in the Tourism Industry: Impacts and Strategies; CRC for Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd.: Gold Coast, Australia, 2008.
  46. Baum, T.; Lundtorp, S. Seasonality in Tourism: An Introduction, in Seasonality in Tourism; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2001; pp. 1–4.
  47. Duro, J.A.; Turrion-Prats, J. Tourism seasonality worldwide. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2019, 31, 38–53.
  48. Brännäs, K.; Nordström, J. Tourist accommodation effects of festivals. Tour. Econ. 2006, 12, 291–302.
  49. Tolkach, D.; King, B. Strengthening Community-Based Tourism in a new resource-based island nation: Why and how? Tour. Manag. 2015, 48, 386–398.
More
Information
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , , , ,
View Times: 262
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 20 Oct 2023
1000/1000
Video Production Service