Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Marko Slavković
 -- 1580 2023-09-28 10:59:03 |
2 layout & references
Sirius Huang
 Meta information modification 1580 2023-10-08 03:06:13 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Perić, G.; Slavković, M.; Gašić, M.; Đurović, B.; Dramićanin, S. Job Satisfaction and Service Quality in Hotel Industry. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49764 (accessed on 03 July 2024).
Perić G, Slavković M, Gašić M, Đurović B, Dramićanin S. Job Satisfaction and Service Quality in Hotel Industry. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49764. Accessed July 03, 2024.
Perić, Goran, Marko Slavković, Marko Gašić, Boban Đurović, Sandra Dramićanin. "Job Satisfaction and Service Quality in Hotel Industry" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49764 (accessed July 03, 2024).
Perić, G., Slavković, M., Gašić, M., Đurović, B., & Dramićanin, S. (2023, September 28). Job Satisfaction and Service Quality in Hotel Industry. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49764
Perić, Goran, et al. "Job Satisfaction and Service Quality in Hotel Industry." Encyclopedia. Web. 28 September, 2023.
Job Satisfaction and Service Quality in Hotel Industry
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/su151814019

The quality of service is one of the key assumptions of a sustainable and profitable business in the hotel industry. On the other hand, employees as direct providers of hotel services have a direct impact on the perceived quality of service. Establishing a relationship between job satisfaction and perceived intangible service quality is of great importance for customer relationship management and sustainable competitive advantage.

job satisfaction intangible service quality hotel industry

1. Introduction

Competition between hotel organizations is increasing, and employees are becoming one of the most important factors for gaining a sustainable competitive advantage and the guest’s trust in a highly competitive market. Nowadays, the hotel industry focuses on employees and guests [1], which requires an effective management of human resources and strengthening the quality of the relationship between employees and guests as a crucial strategy for long-term success. Consequently, employees (human resources) play a central role in the hotel sector since it is a labor-intensive activity, where employees and guests as service users are directed at each other and there is a high level of interaction between them [2][3]. One of the elementary service characteristics is that services are produced and consumed simultaneously, and the process of providing services highlights the importance of employees who directly provide services to guests and communicate with them. Their experience is shaped based on the result of this relationship, and the employee’s behavior toward guests during service delivery is key to service quality. Harvard professors [4] proposed the concept of a “service–profit chain”, suggesting that growth and service organization profits come from loyal customers and their satisfaction with service quality. Satisfied, loyal, and productive employees provide quality services. It starts with the social exchange theory [5], which emphasizes the significance of interpersonal interaction and considers social behavior as an exchange. The outcome of the action–reaction relationship is the perceived benefit, which is represented herein by intangible service quality. The hotel industry employees are the agents of action in social exchange. Frontline service employees are important because it is essential for hotel organizations to manage human resources effectively to ensure that employee attitudes and behaviors positively influence service quality perception. Job satisfaction has become a crucial issue in the hotel industry because the ability to attract and manage human resources is considered a critical element of success [6]. In the not-too-distant future, when intelligent machines can replace human resources in certain operations, the aforementioned is of particular importance. In this manner, it is possible to attain certain benefits through cost reduction, but recent research has demonstrated that productivity is more dependent on the availability of human resource than on automation [7]. In addition, it is highly questionable whether intelligent machines can completely supplant employees in the communication and psychological interaction with guests.
The hotel industry has a relatively bad reputation in the labor market because it is characterized by low employee job satisfaction and high employee turnover rates [8][9][10]. Furthermore, the hotel industry is known for low earnings, poor work–life balance, extended working hours, unsatisfactory job security, and the deficiency of professional development and qualified staff [11][12][13][14]. Other factors are responsible for the low satisfaction level and high turnover in this sector, such as the rapid growth of the hotel industry and the high expectations of young workers [15]. Owing to these characteristics, job satisfaction is a critical issue for employers and managers in the hotel industry. Satisfied employees provide high-quality services and tend to be more productive, creative, and positive [8].

2. Job Satisfaction

Researchers have adopted various approaches to define the concept of job satisfaction. Locke’s value theory is the theoretical foundation of job satisfaction, which has spawned numerous other concepts, studies, and research in related areas, including goal setting and employee performance [16][17][18]. According to this theory, job satisfaction exists insofar as employees are satisfied with the outcome of their work. In addition, discrepancy and deviation of satisfaction from expectations regarding certain aspects of the job also influence overall job satisfaction [19]. There is no general agreement about the definition of job satisfaction [20]. In this discussion, the definition given by Spector is used [21]: job satisfaction is the way employees feel about work and different aspects of work. Spector identified nine aspects of work: pay, promotion, supervision, benefits, rewards, operational procedures, coworkers, nature of work, and communication [21]. To predict job satisfaction, an employee’s satisfaction with certain job aspects and expectations from that job must be determined. Job satisfaction has become one of the most important issues the hotel and tourism industries face [22]. This thesis is confirmed by earlier studies that indicated that service organizations must pay special attention to job satisfaction [4][23][24][25]. The results of empirical research identify plentiful positive effects associated with job satisfaction: employee retention [26][27][28], satisfied consumers [29][30][31], market share, increased competitiveness [32][33][34], and profitability [30][35][36][37].

3. Service Quality

On the basis of Richard Oliver’s theory of expectations–confirmation [38][39], service quality is defined. In accordance with this theory, service quality entails reaching or exceeding consumer expectations. According to Parasuraman et al. [40] and Grönroos [41], service quality represents the difference between consumer expectations and perceptions of the delivered service. From the guest’s perspective, hotel service is an experience. In addition to the specific service characteristics (intangibility, inseparability, heterogeneity, and impermanence) [42], which are generic, Hsu and Powers [43] highlight the participation of people in the service delivery process as an important hotel service characteristic. Initially, Parasuraman et al. [40] contributed significantly to the study of service quality. These authors identified ten dimensions upon which consumers evaluate the quality of a service. A few years later, based on empirical research in the context of five service activities, they concluded that tangibility, reliability, responsibility, and safety best explain the perceived quality of services [44]. Wakefield and Blodgett [45] point out that tangible dimensions of service quality can be categorized as tangible (tangibility) and intangible dimensions of service quality (reliability, responsibility, safety, and empathy). Intangible components represent the overall relationship in the process of providing and using hotel services, which is how the hotel guest experiences and receives the service. Hotel employees play a dominant role in hotel service delivery, and the way an employee provides a service to the guest affects the guest’s perception of quality. Employees are considered the hotel organization’s most important resource, and the quality of their services depends on their job satisfaction, knowledge, skills, and abilities [15].

4. Effects of Employees’ Job Satisfaction on Perceived Service Quality

Employees who provide a service represent an important factor in guest satisfaction, and that is related to the concept of “chain of services—profit” developed by Harvard professors [4], who emphasize that an employee’s job satisfaction creates superior service value, guest satisfaction, loyalty, profit growth, and profitability. Son et al. [46] investigated this concept in the coffee shop industry using a sample of 263 employees and 973 consumers. The results of this study indicate a positive relationship between organizational identification and employee satisfaction. Employee satisfaction positively affects a service’s perceived value, which in turn affects consumer satisfaction.
The theory of equity in social exchanges [5][47][48] posits that employee job satisfaction is related to the improvement of the quality of services, particularly intangible components, which depend primarily on human resources. Interpersonal interactions are the foundation of the theory of social exchange, primarily because exchange necessitates a two-way transaction. The employee consciously calculates the costs and benefits of prospective outcomes and bases his decisions and behavior on these estimates [49]. The fundamental premise of equality in exchanges is that the majority of employees anticipate fairness or equality to prevail in interpersonal transactions [48]. In the context of the social exchange theory, when a manager provides employees with favorable working conditions (good salary, opportunity for advancement, reward system, and good communication), employees tend to exert more effort as a form of reciprocity [35], resulting in a higher level of service quality provided by employees in the hotel industry.
The hypothesis that employee job satisfaction affects service quality and guest satisfaction in service activities was confirmed by the results of numerous empirical studies. Namely, Ong’unya et al. [50] observed the influence of internal marketing and job satisfaction on the quality of health services provided in Uganda. A total of 635 respondents (employees and health service consumers) participated in this study. The results showed that internal marketing and job satisfaction positively affect the provided health services quality. Karatepe et al. [51] examined the effect of job standardization and employee job satisfaction on service quality in service industries in northern Cyprus. Research results confirm that job standardization and employee job satisfaction have significant positive effects on service quality and that job standardization has a significant negative effect on employee satisfaction [51]. A study in Hong Kong [29] examined the relationships between employee job satisfaction, service quality, customer satisfaction, and profitability in service organizations (travel agencies, beauty salons, restaurants, and retail stores). A total of 203 service organizations and 618 respondents participated in this study. The results show that employee satisfaction is significantly correlated with service quality and consumer satisfaction, implying profitability [35]. Sohail and Young [52] examined internal marketing practices, employee satisfaction, service quality, and customer satisfaction in the context of service industries in Saudi Arabia from the perspective of employees. The results show that employees’ perceptions of internal marketing are positively related to employee satisfaction. Additionally, the results indicate that service quality plays a mediating role in the relationship between employee job satisfaction and consumer satisfaction. Satisfied employees believe that the only way to return to their organization is to provide quality services equal to the satisfaction they receive, which implies that employee job satisfaction is vital for achieving service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty [52].

References

  1. Ariffin, A.A.M.; Nameghi, E.N.; Zakaria, N.I. The effect of hospitableness and servicescape on guest satisfaction in the hotel industry. Can. J. Adm. Sci. Rev. Can. Sci. L’Adm. 2013, 30, 127–137.
  2. Slavković, M.; Ognjanović, J.; Bugarčić, M. Sustainability of Human Capital Efficiency in the Hotel Industry: Panel Data Evidence. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2268.
  3. Perić, G.; Gašić, M.; Ivanović, V.; Stojiljković, M. Employee satisfaction in destinations of spa tourism in Serbia. Bizinfo Blace 2015, 6, 1–15.
  4. Heskett, J.L.; Jones, T.O.; Loveman, G.W.; Sasser, W.E.; Schlesinger, L.A. Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1994, 72, 164–174.
  5. Blau, P.M. Exchange and Power in Social Life; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1964.
  6. Glaveli, N.; Grigoroudis, E.; Manolitzas, P. Practical application of MSQ and MUSA methodology in determining critical job satisfaction factors of seasonal employees in summer destination luxury resorts. Tour. Manag. 2019, 74, 426–437.
  7. Ključnikov, A.; Popkova, E.; Sergi, B. Global labour markets and workplaces in the age of intelligent machines. J. Innov. Knowl. 2023, 8, 100407.
  8. Kong, H.; Jiang, X.; Chan, W.; Zhou, X. Job satisfaction research in the field of hospitality and tourism. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 30, 2178–2194.
  9. Kim, M.; Knutson, B.J.; Choi, L. The effects of employee voice and delight on job satisfaction and behaviors: Comparison between employee generations. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2016, 25, 563–588.
  10. Lam, T.; Zhang, H.; Baum, T. An investigation of employees’ job satisfaction: The case of hotels in Hong Kong. Tour. Manag. 2001, 22, 157–165.
  11. Díaz-Carrión, R.; Navajas-Romero, V.; Casas-Rosal, J.C. Comparing working conditions and job satisfaction in hospitality workers across Europe. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 90, 102631.
  12. Jovanović, T.; Mijatov, M.; Dragin, A.S.; Simat, K.; Majstorović, N. Identification of predictors’ effects on perceiving the ethical climate and job satisfaction within Serbian tourism industry. J. Manag. Organ. 2022, 28, 120–148.
  13. Lillo-Bañuls, A.; Casado-Díaz, J.M.; Simón, H. Examining the determinants of job satisfaction among tourism workers. Tour. Econ. 2018, 24, 980–997.
  14. Zopiatis, A.; Constanti, P.; Theocharous, A.L. Job involvement, commitment, satisfaction and turnover: Evidence from hotel employees in Cyprus. Tour. Manag. 2014, 41, 129–140.
  15. Heimerl, P.; Haid, M.; Perkmann, U.; Rabensteiner, M. Job satisfaction as a driver for sustainable development in the hospitality industry? Evidence from the Alpine Region. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6754.
  16. Locke, E.A. What is job satisfaction? Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 1969, 4, 309–336.
  17. Locke, E. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology; Dunnette, M.D., Ed.; Rand McNally: Chicago, IL, USA, 1976; pp. 1297–1349.
  18. Rice, R.W.; Gentile, D.A.; McFarlin, D.B. Facet importance and job satisfaction. J. Appl. Psychol. 1991, 76, 31–39.
  19. Tietjen, M.A.; Myers, R.M. Motivation and job satisfaction. Manag. Decis. 1998, 36, 226–231.
  20. Gautam, M.; Mandal, K.; Dalal, R.S. Job satisfaction of faculty members of veterinary sciences: An analysis. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2006, 18, 15–22.
  21. Spector, P.E. Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences; SAGE Publications Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1997.
  22. Matzler, K.; Renzl, B. Assessing asymmetric effects in the formation of employee satisfaction. Tour. Manag. 2007, 28, 1093–1103.
  23. Rust, R.T.; Stewart, G.L.; Miller, H.; Pielack, D. The satisfaction and retention of frontline employees: A customer satisfaction measurement approach. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 1996, 7, 62–80.
  24. Boshoff, C.; Tait, M. Quality perceptions in the financial services sector: The potential impact of internal marketing. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 1996, 7, 5–31.
  25. Schlesinger, L.; Heskett, L. Breaking the cycle of failure in service. Sloan Manag. Rev. 1991, 32, 17–28.
  26. Yang, J.T. Effect of newcomer socialisation on organisational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover intention in the hotel industry. Serv. Ind. J. 2008, 28, 429–443.
  27. Collins, K.S.; Collins, S.K.; McKinnies, R.; Jensen, S. Employee satisfaction and employee retention: Catalysts to patient satisfaction. Health Care Manag. 2008, 27, 245–251.
  28. Chiang, C.F.; Back, K.J.; Canter, D.D. The impact of employee training on job satisfaction and intention to stay in the hotel industry. J. Hum. Resour. Hosp. Tour. 2005, 4, 99–118.
  29. Jung, H.S.; Yoon, H.H. Do employees’ satisfied customers respond with an satisfactory relationship? The effects of employees’ satisfaction on customers’ satisfaction and loyalty in a family restaurant. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2013, 34, 1–8.
  30. Chi, C.G.; Gursoy, D. Employee satisfaction, customer satisfaction, and financial performance: An empirical examination. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2009, 28, 245–253.
  31. Pantouvakis, A.; Bouranta, N. The interrelationship between service features, job satisfaction and customer satisfaction. TQM J. 2013, 25, 186–201.
  32. Sandhya, K.; Kumar, D.P. Employee retention-A strategic tool for organisational growth and sustaining competitiveness. J. Strateg. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2014, 3, 42–46.
  33. Resurreccion, P.F. Performance management and compensation as drivers of organization competitiveness: The Philippine perspective. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2012, 3, 20–30.
  34. Radovanovic, V.; Savic, L. Motivation and Job Satisfaction-Determinants of Competitiveness. Metal. Int. 2012, 17, 159–166.
  35. Yee, R.W.; Yeung, A.C.; Cheng, T.E. The impact of employee satisfaction on quality and profitability in high-contact service industries. J. Oper. Manag. 2008, 26, 651–668.
  36. Rodríguez-Antón, J.M.; Alonso-Almeida, M.M. Quality certification systems and their impact on employee satisfaction in services with high levels of customer contact. Total Qual. Manag. 2011, 22, 145–157.
  37. Chand, M. The impact of HRM practices on service quality, customer satisfaction and performance in the Indian hotel industry. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2010, 21, 551–566.
  38. Oliver, R.L. Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: An alternative interpretation. J. Appl. Psychol. 1977, 62, 480–486.
  39. Oliver, R.L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 1980, 17, 460–469.
  40. Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Mark. 1985, 49, 41–50.
  41. Grönroos, C. A Service Quality Model and its Marketing Implications. Eur. J. Mark. 1984, 18, 36–44.
  42. Zeithaml, V.A.; Bitner, M.J.; Gremler, D.D. Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus across the Firm; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2018.
  43. Hsu, C.H.; Powers, T. Marketing Hospitality; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002.
  44. Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L. Servqual: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality. J. Retail. 1988, 64, 12–40.
  45. Wakefield, K.L.; Blodgett, J.G. Customer response to intangible and tangible service factors. Psychol. Mark. 1999, 16, 51–68.
  46. Son, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, G.J. Does employee satisfaction influence customer satisfaction? Assessing coffee shops through the service profit chain model. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 94, 102866.
  47. Homans, G.C. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms; Routledge and Kegan Paul: New York, NY, USA, 1961.
  48. Organ, D.W. A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction-causes-performance hypothesis. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1977, 2, 46–53.
  49. Stafford, L.; Kuiper, K. Social exchange theories: Calculating the rewards and costs of personal relationships. In Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication; Braithwaite, D., Schrodt, P., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 379–390.
  50. Ong’unya, G.O.; Kowa, J.B.; Wakibi, A.; Ssenyange, K. The influence of internal marketing and job satisfaction on quality service delivery in a public health sector: A case study of a local government organization in Uganda. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2019, 13, 309–317.
  51. Karatepe, O.M.; Avci, T.; Arasli, H. Effects of Job Standardization and Job Satisfaction on Service Quality: A Study of Frontline Employees in Northern Cyprus. Serv. Mark. Q. 2004, 25, 1–17.
  52. Sohail, M.S.; Jang, J. Understanding the relationships among internal marketing practices, job satisfaction, service quality and customer satisfaction: An empirical investigation of Saudi Arabia’s service employees. Int. J. Tour. Sci. 2017, 17, 67–85.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Management
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Goran Perić
,
Marko Slavković
,
Marko Gašić
,
Boban Đurović
,
Sandra Dramićanin
View Times: 608
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 08 Oct 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback