Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Yuneng Jiang
 -- 1412 2023-09-23 11:08:00 |
2 layout & references
Sirius Huang
 Meta information modification 1412 2023-09-25 03:20:49 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Jiang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Tian, Y. Measurement of Urban Sprawl. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49558 (accessed on 16 November 2024).
Jiang Y, Zhu Y, Tian Y. Measurement of Urban Sprawl. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49558. Accessed November 16, 2024.
Jiang, Yuneng, Yi Zhu, Yasi Tian. "Measurement of Urban Sprawl" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49558 (accessed November 16, 2024).
Jiang, Y., Zhu, Y., & Tian, Y. (2023, September 23). Measurement of Urban Sprawl. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49558
Jiang, Yuneng, et al. "Measurement of Urban Sprawl." Encyclopedia. Web. 23 September, 2023.
Measurement of Urban Sprawl
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/land12081548

In the context of rapid urbanization, inefficient, disorderly, and low-density urban sprawl often leads to resource waste and ecological damage. Over the decades, many studies on the measurement, analysis, and governance of urban sprawl have emerged. 

urban sprawl measurement mechanical equilibrium model urban agglomerations spatial governance

1. Introduction

Accompanied by urbanization and industrialization for decades, urban sprawl, which is defined as an inefficient, disorderly, and low-density development mode (i.e., negative urban expansion), has emerged and developed rapidly [1]. Urban agglomeration is an aggregate of cities within certain geographic areas, which often vary in size, function, and characteristics [2]. Diverse elements, such as population, capital, and technology, are gathered in urban agglomeration areas, leading to a solid economic aggregation and radiation capacity [3]. Urban agglomeration has become an important development focus of countries and regions worldwide and is one of the main drivers of regional socioeconomic growth. For example, urban agglomeration in the New York Bay area, the Tokyo Bay area, and the London metropolitan area have been great drivers of globalization. In China, urban agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region, Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, and Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay area have also become essential carriers of China’s economy, industry, and technological innovation [4].
Despite the importance of urban agglomeration for regional development, the rapid expansion of urban space has also occupied a large amount of rural and ecological space, adding pressure to the eco-environment. In the process of urban expansion, inefficient and disorderly land construction, which is known as “urban sprawl”, has emerged for reasons such as resource mismatching, the imbalance between supply and demand, and competition among local governments [5][6]. Urban sprawl has worsened the human–land relationship, leading to negative results such as damage to biodiversity, the destruction of wetland resources, reduction of arable land resources, increased carbon emissions, and fragmentation of land use, which seriously affect the sustainable development of cities [7][8]. Therefore, measuring the spatial and temporal characteristics of urban sprawl in urban agglomeration and analyzing governance strategies are globally important issues.
To summarize the methods of urban sprawl measurement in previous studies, the metrics have expanded from one dimension to multiple dimensions, and the methods have been improved from qualitative to quantitative methods. However, existing studies lack in-depth consideration for distinguishing efficient expansion from inefficient sprawl. Especially for urban clusters, the large number and types of cities in the region require a certain amount of land space to ensure the needs of regional construction and development, which puts demands on the efficient use of land. Although some studies have considered the relationship between land use, population, and industry [9][10], they have not clearly proposed a quantitative measurement to distinguish between effective expansion and inefficient sprawl. The development of cities involves the spatial expansion of construction land. With limited land resources, urban construction must balance the relationship between land exploitation, socioeconomic development, and ecological environmental protection. Land exploitation refers to the way and purpose for which land is utilized in different times and spaces, including construction land and agricultural land. Socioeconomic development refers to changes and developments in demographic, economic, and social activities over time. Ecological and environmental protection, on the other hand, prioritizes the protection of ecological safety and maximizes the benefits of ecosystem services in the process of land use in order to achieve the dual goals of socioeconomic development and ecological environmental protection. It is necessary to formulate a sustainable land use policy and combine it with socioeconomic development so as to realize a win-win situation for both the ecological environment and the socioeconomy. Therefore, whether urban expansion is effective or not must be distinguished.

2. Measurement of Urban Sprawl in Previous Studies

Urban sprawl is a spatially inefficient, disorderly, and chaotic development pattern. Therefore, studies have often measured the extent of urban sprawl by adopting indicators that reflect this spatial disorder in different dimensions. Common subdimensions include area, density, shape, and topological relationships. As shown in Table 1, researchers classify the indicators of urban sprawl in terms of land, function, and economy and evaluates them in terms of four aspects: area, density, shape, and topological relationship.
Table 1. Main urban sprawl measurements and indicated characteristics.
Category Index Area Density Shape Topological Relation
Land Urban elasticity index + [11] ✔ ✔    
Population-urban expansion index + [12] ✔      
Built-up area per capita + [13] ✔ ✔    
Urban sprawl index * [14] ✔      
Land use geospatial indices # [10]   ✔ ✔  
  Urban sprawl matrix # [15] ✔ ✔ ✔  
Function Compactness * [16]   ✔ ✔  
Shannon’s entropy index * [17]   ✔   ✔
Expansion difference composite index * [18] ✔      
Landscape metrics * [19] ✔ ✔   ✔
Economics Degree of equal distribution * [20] ✔ ✔    
Percentage of employment outside a certain distance coming from the CBD * [21] ✔ ✔    
Residential area per capita * [22] ✔      
  Sprawl index of the population * [14]   ✔   ✔
“*”, “+”, and “#” identify the statistical indicators of space, time, and spatiotemporality, respectively.
Studies on the measurement of urban sprawl have been conducted, including single indicator descriptions, comprehensive evaluations, and entropy models. However, urban sprawl is an inefficient, low-density, and disorderly development pattern, indicating the incompatibility between socioeconomic development, urban spatial expansion, and urban function improvement. Moreover, the existing measurement methods fail to measure the balance of the indicators. 
Despite the rich discussion of urban sprawl models, the following two essential aspects have been insufficiently studied: (1) Limitations to urban functions in urban construction make it difficult to meet the daily needs of residents, often causing social inequity. Therefore, the dimension of urban function must be included in the measurement framework [3]. (2) The relationship between the different dimensions is rarely considered. Thus, the difference between sprawl and expansion is not distinguished in consideration of the needs of development and the necessity of conservation [23].

3. Spatial Planning and Urban Sprawl Control

Given that urbanization is ongoing, especially in developing countries, facing the common task of ecological civilization construction and discussing how to realize urban sprawl control through strategies such as spatial planning are critical. Planners and administrators must consider problems in accordance with the actual situation in their region. This section categorizes developed and developing countries and explores the spatial governance strategies of urban sprawl in terms of four aspects: land use policy, market economy strategy, industrial structure adjustment, and administrative division management (Table 2).
Table 2. Examples of spatial governance strategies for urban sprawl.
  Developed Countries Developing Countries
Land use policy (1) Green belts in Western developed countries are established by government authorities and typically demarcate areas surrounding a city or town where development is restricted. This is preserved in the green areas surrounding the urban area and prevents urban sprawl [24]. (1) China has implemented a series of land use policies, such as the “New-type Urbanization Plan” and “Land Management Regulations”, aimed at promoting sustainable urbanization and rational land use [25].
(2) A land reserve system, which allows the government to control the supply of land for urban development, is established, thereby controlling the pace of urbanization and limiting urban sprawl [26].
Market economy strategy (1) The private sector plays a crucial role in urban development in Western developed countries, with the government often providing incentives for private investment in urban renewal and redevelopment projects [27].
(2) The government established policies that encourage public–private partnerships in urban development, allowing the private sector to play a role in urban renewal and redevelopment projects [28].		 (1) In developing countries such as China and India, special economic zones are established to attract foreign investment and promote economic growth [29].
(2) The government established policies that encourage public–private partnerships in urban development, allowing the private sector to play a role in urban renewal and redevelopment projects [30].
Industrial restructuring (1) The development of high-tech industries, such as the IT and renewable energy sectors, is also a priority in Western developed countries, as these industries are considered key drivers of economic growth and competitiveness [31]. (1) The government encouraged the development of high-tech industries, such as the biotechnology and renewable energy sectors, to drive economic growth and improve the competitiveness of the urban economy [32].
Administrative zoning management (1) Western developed countries have established systems of urban governance that are based on decentralized decision making and local autonomy [33].
(2) Coordination and cooperation across administrative boundaries [34].		 (1) China’s urban administrative division system is based on a hierarchical model, with the central government having the power to approve the establishment of new cities and urban districts [35].
(2) Limit urban development boundaries to control urban sprawl effectively [36].
Despite numerous studies on urban sprawl governance strategies, the existing studies still have two shortcomings: (1) The current consideration is the relatively single dimension, whereas urban expansion is a complex process, and its spatial governance should also consider the coordination of the interests of multiple parties. (2) Most studies were conducted in the direction of land policy and market economic regulation for strategy enhancement, but only a few of them mentioned the strategy of urban function enhancement.

References

  1. Jarah, S.; Zhou, B.; Abdullah, R.; Lu, Y.; Yu, W. Urbanization and Urban Sprawl Issues in City Structure: A Case of the Sulaymaniah Iraqi Kurdistan Region. Sustainability 2019, 11, 485.
  2. Fang, C.; Yu, D. Urban agglomeration: An evolving concept of an emerging phenomenon. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017, 162, 126–136.
  3. Tian, Y.; Mao, Q. The effect of regional integration on urban sprawl in urban agglomeration areas: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Habitat Int. 2022, 130, 102695.
  4. Tian, Y. Mutualistic Pattern of Intra-Urban Agglomeration and Impact Analysis: A Case Study of 11 Urban Agglomerations of Mainland China. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 565.
  5. Wang, J.; Ma, H.; Jiang, M.; Zang, J. Urban Sprawl, Land Resource Mismatch and Agglomeration Economy. Explor. Econ. Issues 2021, 10, 62–73.
  6. Zhang, J.; Lou, C.; Xiu, C. Spatial Patterns of Local Government Competition–An Empirical Analysis of the Spread of Urban Agglomerations in the Yangtze River Delta. Urban. Reg. Dev. 2020, 5, 85–93.
  7. Hu, K.; Lin, M.; Lin, T.; Ye, H.; Zhang, G.; Sui, J.; Chen, T.; Yao, X.; Lu, X. Spatial Identification and Quantitative Assessment of Urban Sprawl and Ecological Conservation Conflicts in Rapid Urbanization. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2022, 42, 462–473.
  8. Sarkodie, S.A.; Owusu, P.A.; Leirvik, T. Global effect of urban sprawl, industrialization, trade and economic development on carbon dioxide emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 034049.
  9. Song, X.; Feng, Q.; Xia, F.; Li, X.; Scheffran, J. Impacts of changing urban land-use structure on sustainable city growth in China: A population-density dynamics perspective. Habitat Int. 2021, 107, 102296.
  10. Noor, M.N.; Rosni, N.A.; Hashim, M.; Abdullah, A. Developing land use geospatial indices (LUGI) for sprawl measurement in alpha cities: Case study of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Cities 2018, 82, 127–140.
  11. Rusk, D. Cities without Suburbs; Woodrow Wilson Center Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1993.
  12. Fei-Xue, L.I.; Man-Chun, L.I.; Yong-Xue, L.I.; Jian, L.I.N.; Zhen-Jie, C.H.N. Urban growth in Nanjing since 1949. J. Nat. Resour. 2007, 22, 524–535.
  13. Hortas-Rico, M. Urban sprawl and municipal budgets in Spain: A dynamic panel data analysis. Pap. Reg. Sci. 2014, 93, 843–864.
  14. Lopez, R.; Hynes, H.P. Sprawl in the 1990s Measurement, Distribution, and Trends. Urban Aff. Rev. 2003, 38, 325–355.
  15. Sahana, M.; Hong, H.; Sajjad, H. Analyzing urban spatial patterns and trend of urban growth using urban sprawl matrix: A study on Kolkata urban agglomeration, India. Sci. Total Env. 2018, 628–629, 1557–1566.
  16. Abdullahi, S.; Pradhan, B.; Mojaddadi, H. City Compactness: Assessing the Influence of the Growth of Residential Land Use. J. Urban Technol. 2017, 25, 21–46.
  17. Das Chatterjee, N.; Chatterjee, S.; Khan, A. Spatial modeling of urban sprawl around Greater Bhubaneswar city, India. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2015, 2, 1–21.
  18. Lin, M.; Chen, Y.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, J.; Wang, L. Analysis on the difference of construction land expansion among the inner districts of big city and its cause- A case study of Changsha city. Econ. Geogr. 2006, 5, 836–841+845.
  19. Taiwo, O.J. Modelling the spatiotemporal patterns of urban sprawl in Ibadan metropolis between 1984 and 2013 in Nigeria. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2021, 8, 121–140.
  20. Tsai, Y.-H. Quantifying Urban Form: Compactness versus ‘Sprawl’. Urban Study 2005, 42, 141–161.
  21. Fallah, B.N.; Partridge, M.D.; Olfert, M.R. Urban sprawl and productivity: Evidence from US metropolitan areas. Pap. Reg. Sci. 2011, 90, 451–472.
  22. Kowalczyk, C.; Kil, J.; Kurowska, K. Dynamics of development of the largest cities–Evidence from Poland. Cities 2019, 89, 26–34.
  23. Bhatta, B. Analysis of Urban Growth and Sprawl from Remote Sensing Data; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010.
  24. Xie, X.; Kang, H.; Behnisch, M.; Baildon, M.; Krüger, T. To What Extent Can the Green Belts Prevent Urban Sprawl?—A Comparative Study of Frankfurt am Main, London and Seoul. Sustainability 2020, 12, 679.
  25. Wang, J.; Lin, Y.; Glendinning, A.; Xu, Y. Land-use changes and land policies evolution in China’s urbanization processes. Land Use Policy 2018, 75, 375–387.
  26. Qian, J.; Peng, Y.; Luo, C.; Wu, C.; Du, Q. Urban Land Expansion and Sustainable Land Use Policy in Shenzhen: A Case Study of China’s Rapid Urbanization. Sustainability 2016, 8, 16.
  27. Lum, S.K.; Sim, L.L.; Malone-Lee, L.C. Market-led policy measures for urban redevelopment in Singapore. Land Use Policy 2004, 21, 1–19.
  28. Nuissl, H.; Schroeter-Schlaack, C. On the economic approach to the containment of land consumption. Environ. Sci. Policy 2009, 12, 270–280.
  29. Leong, C.K. Special economic zones and growth in China and India: An empirical investigation. Int. Econ. Econ. Policy 2013, 10, 549–567.
  30. Kort, M.; Klijn, E.H. Public–private partnerships in urban regeneration projects: Organizational form or managerial capacity? Public Adm. Rev. 2011, 71, 618–626.
  31. Ćetković, S.; Buzogány, A.J.C.P. Varieties of capitalism and clean energy transitions in the European Union: When renewable energy hits different economic logics. Clim. Policy 2016, 16, 642–657.
  32. Chang, C.-T.; Lee, H.-C. Taiwan’s renewable energy strategy and energy-intensive industrial policy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 64, 456–465.
  33. Keuffer, N. Local Self-Government and the Choice for Local Governance Arrangements in Nine Swiss Municipal Tasks. In The Future of Local Self-Government: European Trends in Autonomy, Innovations and Central-Local Relations; Bergström, T., Franzke, J., Kuhlmann, S., Wayenberg, E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 67–81.
  34. Fertner, C.; Jørgensen, G.; Sick Nielsen, T.A.; Bernhard Nilsson, K.S. Urban sprawl and growth management–Drivers, impacts and responses in selected European and US cities. Future Cities Environ. 2016, 2, 9.
  35. Cartier, C. A political economy of rank: The territorial administrative hierarchy and leadership mobility in urban China. J. Contemp. China 2016, 25, 529–546.
  36. Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Ye, Y.; Wang, Z. Curbing Sprawl with Development-limiting Boundaries in Urban China: A Review of Literature. J. Plan. Lit. 2019, 35, 25–40.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Area Studies
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Yuneng Jiang
,
Yi Zhu
,
Yasi Tian
View Times: 352
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 25 Sep 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback