Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Luís Bernardo
 -- 1590 2023-09-18 09:47:22 |
2 layout
Camila Xu
 Meta information modification 1590 2023-09-18 09:51:15 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Rashid, F.L.; Al-Obaidi, M.A.; Dulaimi, A.; Bernardo, L.F.A.; Eleiwi, M.A.; Mahood, H.B.; Hashim, A. Conceptual Challenges of Utilising PCMs in Concrete Industry. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49326 (accessed on 17 November 2024).
Rashid FL, Al-Obaidi MA, Dulaimi A, Bernardo LFA, Eleiwi MA, Mahood HB, et al. Conceptual Challenges of Utilising PCMs in Concrete Industry. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49326. Accessed November 17, 2024.
Rashid, Farhan Lafta, Mudhar A. Al-Obaidi, Anmar Dulaimi, Luís Filipe Almeida Bernardo, Muhammad Asmail Eleiwi, Hameed B. Mahood, Ahmed Hashim. "Conceptual Challenges of Utilising PCMs in Concrete Industry" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49326 (accessed November 17, 2024).
Rashid, F.L., Al-Obaidi, M.A., Dulaimi, A., Bernardo, L.F.A., Eleiwi, M.A., Mahood, H.B., & Hashim, A. (2023, September 18). Conceptual Challenges of Utilising PCMs in Concrete Industry. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/49326
Rashid, Farhan Lafta, et al. "Conceptual Challenges of Utilising PCMs in Concrete Industry." Encyclopedia. Web. 18 September, 2023.
Conceptual Challenges of Utilising PCMs in Concrete Industry
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/jcs7090352

Most concrete employs organic phase change materials (PCMs), although there are different types available for more specialised use. Organic PCMs are the material of choice for concrete due to their greater heat of fusion and lower cost in comparison to other PCMs.

thermal energy storage phase change materials concrete

1. Introduction

When a phase transition occurs (such as from solid to liquid or liquid to gas), phase change materials (PCMs) have the ability to absorb and release significant amounts of thermal energy. These substances are crucial for a number of applications, such as heat management, temperature control, and energy storage. The following elaborates on a few common examples of phase transition materials and their thermal behaviour, stability, physical, and chemical characteristics in relation to their applications [1][2][3].
First, paraffin wax (organic) has a well-defined melting point and strong thermal stability, which makes the phase shift process predictable and reproducible. It is generally stable across a broad temperature range and during numerous cycles of melting and solidification. Depending on its composition, paraffin wax commonly melts between 46 °C and 68 °C at relatively low temperatures [4]. Due to its non-toxic and non-reactive chemical properties, it can be used for a variety of purposes, including thermal energy storage, food packaging, and building insulation. The use of paraffin wax as a thermal interface medium in electronics and in passive thermal control systems for buildings is quite popular.
Second, salt hydrates (inorganic) are solid substances that have high latent heat values and acute melting points, which in turn results in effective energy storage and release during phase transitions. They are typically stable when kept in a closed container, although they can deteriorate when exposed to air moisture. Salt hydrates have hygroscopic properties, which means they are prone to absorbing moisture [5]. Water absorption must be avoided because it can impair their effectiveness. In applications for air cooling and solar thermal energy storage, salt hydrates are preferred.
Third, eutectic mixtures are made up of two or more organic compounds that have a certain composition that enables them to melt and solidify at consistent temperatures, resulting in a clearly defined phase shift. Eutectic mixes often display high cycle lives and are stable. These materials come in a variety of shapes, including slabs, powders, and pellets, and their melting points can be adjusted to meet the needs of certain applications [6]. Eutectic PCMs are typically non-toxic and non-corrosive, which makes them appropriate for thermal energy storage in electronics and structures such as portable cooling units and temperature-controlled packaging.
Fourth, metallic PCMs (inorganic) frequently exhibit strong thermal conductivity, allowing for quick heat transfer throughout phase change operations. These materials have great thermal stability and can endure repeated cycles of melting and solidification without suffering serious damage [7]. To best suit certain applications, metallic PCMs might take the form of pure metals or metal alloys with specialised melting points. Although they can differ depending on the particular metal or alloy used, chemical qualities are typically stable and non-toxic. Aerospace applications and high-power electronics cooling frequently use metallic PCMs.
Nowadays, the rising energy needs of buildings and the severity of global warming are significant problems. To address these issues, thermal energy storage (TES) building materials are being prepared by incorporating phase change materials (PCMs) into construction materials [8][9][10][11]. The ability of PCMs to collect and release thermal energy suggests that they might be used to mitigate the effects of temperature fluctuations on building performance. Thus, PCMs will serve to simultaneously provide thermal comfort and reduce energy consumption in buildings [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].
While, in theory, every substance may be called a PCM, not all of them are practical for everyday construction. In fact, PCMs necessitate guaranteeing a minimum of three rudimentary needs to be efficiently incorporated into the components of construction (such as structures and incorporated energy regimes): (1) an elevated melting enthalpy, (2) a suitable temperature of phase change, and (3) a limited volume variation through the phase change. Further features, like safety and heat conductivity, and many methodical as well as economic issues, such as manufacture cost and usage mode, have to be taken into account while selecting the correct PCM [20][21][22][23][24][25].
Over the last decade, there has been a significant surge in academic interest in PCMs as a result of the widespread availability of products at affordable prices and potential areas of utilisation in building applications [26]. Walls, ceilings, roofs, and windows are all examples of building components or structural members that can integrate PCMs [27][28][29]. To develop lighter architectural structures, PCM integration often reduces the mass density of the final materials. The usage of latent heat storage materials like PCMs was extensively researched by the technical community due to their significant perspective in relation to the enhanced heat of melting [30][31][32][33][34].
Cement, gypsum, concrete, brick, etc. are all viable options for the construction of interior walls. Many efforts have been undertaken in recent years to develop materials for construction that are capable of storing as well as releasing thermal energy. Although a large-scale study failed to demonstrate efficiency, Stoll et al. [35] claimed that passive thermal treatments using PCMs may significantly lower the risk of bridge freezing. Drissi et al. [36] looked at how microcapsules’ decay affected their thermo-physical characteristics. This may happen, for instance, as a result of mechanical stress experienced during the mixing of PCM and concrete. The experiments revealed that the damaged PCMs lost roughly 12% of their fusion heat and 28% of their specific heat capacity. The heat conductivity of porous construction materials like wood [37] and concrete [38] has been the subject of modelling efforts as well, with the goal of developing fractal-based models to make predictions.
Bentz and Turpin [39] conducted a numerical analysis of the thermal reactions of bridge decks at twelve different sites using the CONTEMP computer model and found that the latent heat released by PCM might lower the yearly frequency of freeze-thaw cycles by roughly 30%. According to the research by Sakulich and Bentz [40], incorporating PCMs onto bridge decks might be an effective technique for elongating their useful life. Freeze-thaw management (FCM) using paraffin oil and methyl laurate was studied by Farnam et al. [41]. Using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), they compared the efficiency of two PCM impregnation techniques, namely, lightweight aggregate filling and tube filling. Sharshir et al. [42] directed a comprehensive analysis of the most current research on the TES using phase change materials in construction applications. Furthermore, the PCMs for sustainable and energy-efficient construction were the subject of a comprehensive study by Wang et al. [43].
Ling and Poon [44] provided an overview of PCMs, how to include them, and how they affect concrete’s characteristics both while it is fresh and after it is hardened. The PCMs’ thermal performance in concrete was also discussed, as were their stability and any issues encountered while incorporating them into the material.

2. Conceptual Challenges of Utilising PCMs in the Concrete Industry

In order for the use of PCMs in the concrete industry to be effective and have optimum efficiency, a number of related difficulties must be resolved. The following are a few of the most pressing obstacles [45][46][47][48]:
  • It is essential to guarantee PCM compatibility with various concrete mix types. Some PCMs may interact with certain admixtures or additives used in the manufacture of concrete, changing its mechanical properties or posing compatibility problems.
  • Over time, some PCMs may experience phase change cycling, which could result in performance loss, leakage, or deterioration. For construction to be sustainable and long-lasting, PCM stability inside the concrete matrix must be guaranteed.
  • During phase transitions, some PCMs can experience volume changes, which could cause micro-cracking in the concrete matrix. To prevent damaging impacts on the concrete’s structural integrity, these volume variations must be controlled.
  • Due to the super-cooling phenomenon, PCMs can experience a lack of solidification, which reduces their ability to store latent heat and causes an insufficient phase change cycle. As a result, ineffective phase change features of PCMs are anticipated.
  • The inside environment of concrete is quite alkaline by nature, and in some circumstances, this high alkali causes the PCMs to degrade. For application in concrete, high-alkali PCMs such as polyethylene glycol ought to be excluded.
  • When PCM is incorporated into concrete via the immersion method or the direct mixing method, PCM leakage from the concrete may result. During the mechanical mixing of these techniques with other concrete ingredients, some of the PCM that has been encapsulated may be broken. In order to achieve an efficient phase change of the PCMs while keeping the maximum strength of the concrete, extensive analysis must be performed to choose the appropriate way of PCM inclusion into the concrete.
  • The rate of heat absorption and release during the phase transition operation is reduced considering PCM’s poor thermal conductivity. Particularly when the temperature varies quickly, low thermal conductivity PCM is useless for energy storage. Thus, it is crucial to ensure efficient heat transmission during phase change transitions to increase the capacity for energy storage and release.
  • In contrast to conventional concrete materials, PCMs that are acceptable for concrete are not always inexpensive or easily obtainable on the market.
  • Buildings that use PCM-enhanced concrete might need to comply with specific regulations and requirements. It is crucial to create standards and guidelines concerning PCM applications because they can promote business acceptance and regulatory acceptability. However, the absence of long-term data on how PCMs affect the longevity of concrete has deterred stakeholders from approving their use.
For PCM-enhanced concrete to be successfully implemented and widely used in the building sector, it will be essential to cope with these challenges through ongoing research, better materials, advanced encapsulation methodologies, design optimisation methods, and the creation of appropriate standards.

References

  1. Rashid, F.L.; Rahbari, A.; Ibrahem, R.K.; Talebizadehsardari, P.; Basem, A.; Kaood, A.; Mohammed, H.I.; Abbas, M.H.; Al-Obaidi, M.A. Review of solidification and melting performance of phase change materials in the presence of magnetic field, rotation, tilt angle, and vibration. J. Energy Storage 2023, 67, 107501.
  2. Nóbrega, C.R.; Ismail, K.A.; Lino, F.A. Solidification around axial finned tube submersed in PCM: Modeling and experiments. J. Energy Storage 2020, 29, 101438.
  3. Khademi, A.; Shank, K.; Mehrjardi, S.A.A.; Tiari, S.; Sorrentino, G.; Said, Z.; Chamkha, A.J.; Ushak, S. A brief review on different hybrid methods of enhancement within latent heat storage systems. J. Energy Storage 2022, 54, 105362.
  4. Baskin, D. Fixation and tissue processing in immunohistochemistry. In Pathobiology of Human Disease; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2014; pp. 3797–3806.
  5. Nartowska, E.; Styś-Maniara, M.; Kozłowski, T. The Potential Environmental and Social Influence of the Inorganic Salt Hydrates Used as a Phase Change Material for Thermal Energy Storage in Solar Installations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1331.
  6. Rai, U.; Pandey, P. Solidification and thermal behaviour of binary organic eutectic and monotectic; succinonitrile–pyrene system. J. Cryst. Growth 2003, 249, 301–308.
  7. Li, Z.; Wu, Y.; Zhuang, B.; Zhao, X.; Tang, Y.; Ding, X.; Chen, K. Preparation of novel copper-powder-sintered frame/paraffin form-stable phase change materials with extremely high thermal conductivity. Appl. Energy 2017, 206, 1147–1157.
  8. Joulin, A.; Zalewski, L.; Lassue, S.; Naji, H. Experimental investigation of thermal characteristics of a mortar with or without a micro-encapsulated phase change material. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 66, 171–180.
  9. Karaipekli, A.; Sarı, A.; Biçer, A. Thermal regulating performance of gypsum/(C18–C24) composite phase change material (CPCM) for building energy storage applications. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 107, 55–62.
  10. Zhang, Y.; Ding, J.; Wang, X.; Yang, R.; Lin, K. Influence of additives on thermal conductivity of shape-stabilized phase change material. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2006, 90, 1692–1702.
  11. Cabeza, L.F.; Castell, A.; Barreneche, C.; De Gracia, A.; Fernández, A.I. Materials used as PCM in thermal energy storage in buildings: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1675–1695.
  12. Ling, T.-C.; Poon, C.-S. Use of phase change materials for thermal energy storage in concrete: An overview. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 46, 55–62.
  13. Kousksou, T.; Arid, A.; Jamil, A.; Zeraouli, Y. Thermal behavior of building material containing microencapsulated PCM. Thermochim. Acta 2012, 550, 42–47.
  14. Dhaidan, N.S.; Kokz, S.A.; Rashid, F.L.; Hussein, A.K.; Younis, O.; Al-Mousawi, F.N. Review of solidification of phase change materials dispersed with nanoparticles in different containers. J. Energy Storage 2022, 51, 104271.
  15. Rashid, F.L.; Hussein, A.K.; Malekshah, E.H.; Abderrahmane, A.; Guedri, K.; Younis, O. Review of Heat Transfer Analysis in Different Cavity Geometries with and without Nanofluids. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2481.
  16. Tiji, M.E.; Al-Azzawi, W.K.; Mohammed, H.I.; Dulaimi, A.; Rashid, F.L.; Mahdi, J.M.; Majdi, H.S.; Talebizadehsardari, P.; Ali, H.M. Thermal Management of the Melting Process in a Latent Heat Triplex Tube Storage System Using Different Configurations of Frustum Tubes. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022, 7398110.
  17. Rashid, F.L.; Basem, A.; Khalaf, F.A.A.; Abbas, M.H.; Hashim, A. Recent Breakthroughs and Improvements in Phase Change Material Melting in a Triple-Tube Thermal Storage Unit. Rev. Compos. Matériaux Avancés-J. Compos. Adv. Mater. 2022, 32, 295–304.
  18. Hashim, A.; Braihi, A.J.; Rashid, F.L.; Hashim, M.S. Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Cement/Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone-Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Y2O3 Nanocomposites for Piezoelectric Application. Adv. Sci., Eng. and Med. 2019, 11, 419–422.
  19. Rashid, F.L.; Al-Obaidi, M.A.; Dulaimi, A.; Bahlol, H.Y.; Hasan, A. Recent Advances, Development, and Impact of Using Phase Change Materials as Thermal Energy Storage in Different Solar Energy Systems: A Review. Designs 2023, 7, 66.
  20. Cellat, K.; Beyhan, B.; Güngör, C.; Konuklu, Y.; Karahan, O.; Dündar, C.; Paksoy, H. Thermal enhancement of concrete by adding bio-based fatty acids as phase change materials. Energy Build. 2015, 106, 156–163.
  21. Agyenim, F.; Hewitt, N.; Eames, P.; Smyth, M. A review of materials, heat transfer and phase change problem formulation for latent heat thermal energy storage systems (LHTESS). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 615–628.
  22. Hunger, M.; Entrop, A.G.; Mandilaras, I.; Brouwers, H.J.H.; Founti, M. The behavior of self-compacting concrete containing mi-cro-encapsulated phase change materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2009, 31, 731–743.
  23. Akiyama, T.; Ashizawa, Y.; Yagi, J.-I. Storage and release of heat in a single spherical capsule containing phase change material with a high melting point. Heat Transf. Jpn. Res 1992, 21, 199–217.
  24. Barreneche, C.; De Gracia, A.; Serrano, S.; Navarro, M.E.; Borreguero, A.M.; Fernandez, A.I.; Carmona, M.; Rodriguez, J.F.; Cabeza, L.F. Comparison of three different de-vices available in Spain to test thermal properties of building materials including phase change materials. Appl. Energy 2013, 109, 421–427.
  25. Sharma, A.; Tyagi, V.V.; Chen, C.R.; Buddhi, D. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 318–345.
  26. Kalnæs, S.E.; Jelle, P.B. Review. Phase change materials and products for building applications: A state-of-the-art review and future research opportunities. Energy Build. 2015, 94, 150–176.
  27. Alqallaf, H.J.; Alawadhi, E.M. Concrete roof with cylindrical holes containing PCM to reduce the heat gain. Energy Build. 2013, 61, 73–80.
  28. Royon, L.; Karim, L.; Bontemps, A. Thermal energy storage and release of a new component with PCM for integration in floors for thermal management of buildings. Energy Build. 2013, 63, 29–35.
  29. Navarro, L.; de Gracia, A.; Castell, A.; Álvarez, S.; Cabeza, L.F. PCM incorporation in a concrete core slab as a thermal storage and supply system: Proof of concept. Energy Build. 2015, 103, 70–82.
  30. Giro-Paloma, J.; Al-Shannaq, R.; Fernández, A.I.; Farid, M.M. Preparation and characterization of microencapsulated phase change materials for use in building applications. Materials 2016, 9, 11.
  31. Zhou, D.; Zhao, C.Y.; Tian, Y. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials (PCMs) in building applications. Appl. Energy 2012, 92, 593–605.
  32. Baetens, R.; Jelle, B.P.; Gustavsen, A. Phase change materials for building applications: A state-of-the-art review. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 1361–1368.
  33. Sukontasukkul, P.; Nontiyutsirikul, N.; Songpiriyakij, S.; Sakai, K.; Chindaprasirt, P. Use of phase change material to improve thermal properties of lightweight geopolymer panel. Mater. Struct. 2016, 49, 4637–4645.
  34. Bentz, D.P.; Turpin, R. Potential applications of phase change materials in concrete technology. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2007, 29, 527–532.
  35. Stoll, F.; Drake, M.L.; Salyer, I.O. Use of phase change materials to prevent overnight freezing of bridge decks. In IDEA Program; Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 1996; pp. 1–23.
  36. Drissi, S.; Eddhahak, A.; Caré, S.; Neji, J. Thermal analysis by DSC of phase change materials, study of the damage effect. J. Build. Eng. 2015, 1, 13–19.
  37. Zhu, Q.; Xie, M.; Yang, J.; Li, Y. A fractal model for the coupled heat and mass transfer in porous fibrous media. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2011, 54, 1400–1409.
  38. Fan, L.-W.; Hu, Y.-C.; Tian, T.; Yu, Z.-T. The prediction of effective thermal conductivities perpendicular to the fibers of wood using a fractal and an improved transient measurement technique. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2006, 49, 4116–4123.
  39. Al-Garah, N.H.; Rashid, F.L.; Hadi, A.; Hashim, A. Synthesis and Characterization of Novel (Organic–Inorganic) Nanofluids for Antibacterial, Antifungal and Heat Transfer Applications. J. Bionanosci. 2018, 12, 336–340.
  40. Sakulich, A.R.; Bentz, D.P. Increasing the service life of bridge decks by incorporating phase-change materials to reduce freeze-thaw cycles. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2011, 24, 1034–1042.
  41. Farnam, Y.; Krafcik, M.; Liston, L.; Washington, T.; Erk, K.; Tao, B.; Weiss, J. Evaluating the use of phase change materials in concrete pavement to melt ice and snow. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2016, 28, 04015161.
  42. Sharshir, S.W.; Joseph, A.; Elsharkawy, M.; Hamada, M.A.; Kandeal, A.; Elkadeem, M.R.; Thakur, A.K.; Ma, Y.; Moustapha, M.E.; Rashad, M.; et al. Thermal energy storage using phase change materials in building applications: A review of the recent development. Energy Build. 2023, 285, 112908.
  43. Wang, X.; Li, W.; Luo, Z.; Wang, K.; Shah, S.P. A critical review on phase change materials (PCM) for sustainable and energy efficient building: Design, characteristic, performance and application. Energy Build. 2022, 260, 111923.
  44. Braihi, A.J.; Hashim, A.; Rashid, F.L.; Hashim, M.S. Novel of Piezoelectric Application for Cement Mortar/CMC-PVP-ZrO2 Nanocomposites. Adv. Sci., Eng. and Med. 2019, 11, 415–418.
  45. Adesina, A. Use of phase change materials in concrete: Current challenges. Renew. Energy Environ. Sustain. 2019, 4, 9.
  46. Sharma, R.; Jang, J.-G.; Hu, J.-W. Phase-Change Materials in Concrete: Opportunities and Challenges for Sustainable Construction and Building Materials. Materials 2022, 15, 335.
  47. Rashid, F.L.; Hashim, A. Recent Review on Nanofluid/ Nanocomposites for Solar Energy Storage. Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Dev. 2020, 3, 780–789.
  48. Tyagi, V.; Kaushik, S.; Tyagi, S.; Akiyama, T. Development of phase change materials based microencapsulated technology for buildings: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1373–1391.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Engineering, Civil
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Farhan Lafta Rashid
,
Mudhar A. Al-Obaidi
,
Anmar Dulaimi
,
Luís Filipe Almeida Bernardo
,
Muhammad Asmail Eleiwi
,
Hameed B. Mahood
,
Ahmed Hashim
View Times: 445
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 18 Sep 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    ScholarVision Creations
    Feedback