Dementia Severity Scale Based on MRI

Version	Summary	Created by	Modification	Content Size	Created at	Operation
1		Wei Li	--	1244	2023-08-10 09:51:10	\|
2	format correction	Dean Liu	Meta information modification	1244	2023-08-11 02:35:08	\|

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/s23156871

In the clinical treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, one of the most important tasks is evaluating its severity for diagnosis and therapy. However, traditional testing methods are deficient, such as their susceptibility to subjective factors, incomplete evaluation, low accuracy, or insufficient granularity, resulting in unreliable evaluation scores.

medical robots disease evaluation Alzheimer’s disease

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with an insidious onset. It is the most common cause of dementia and one of the most expensive and deadliest diseases of the century ^[1]. Clinical manifestations include memory impairment, aphasia, apraxia, agnosia, impairment of visuospatial skills, executive dysfunction, personality changes, and behavioral changes. The cause of AD is still unclear; however, its progression is usually accompanied by a decline in neurological function. Therefore, in clinical diagnosis, physicians attempt to evaluate subtle changes in the progression of the disease stage by evaluating the level of neurological function and recommending an appropriate treatment plan. The Psychiatric Rating Scale is one of the auxiliary evaluation methods commonly used by physicians. There are many kinds of psychiatric rating scales for Alzheimer’s disease; however, these scales are not sufficiently accurate and comprehensive, which leads to the low credibility of the traditional scales. Moreover, they lack objectivity and are not a reliable basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) is another auxiliary evaluation method that allows physicians to diagnose based on the degree of brain atrophy in MRI images. However, this approach is highly dependent on the physician’s subjective judgment and does not provide a detailed quantitative evaluation.

Deep learning is a powerful method that has been applied to medical images and automated accomplishing targeted tasks in an end-to-end way. There have been many published studies in recent years that have successfully applied this approach to medical image analysis tasks and generally achieved significant improvements ^[2]^[3]^[4]. Most previous studies focused on the prediction of disease categories, classifying patients’ images into discrete categories. However, for many types of diseases, the stages may exhibit a continuous variation in severity that can change over time ^[5]^[6]^[7]. These different stages of a disease are often classified into ordinal levels (e.g., normal, mild, moderate, and severe), but variations within these ordinal levels are usually underappreciated, and deep learning methods have been applied to evaluate disease stages in limited cases. This may be owing to the absence of the gold standard and representative samples for determining the AD stage.

In the field of deep learning, evaluating the differences between images can be expressed as a metric learning problem. The contrastive learning strategy is commonly employed for metric learning, and it is often used to evaluate the similarity between images. This strategy trains a network using contrastive loss functions and considers the metric between the network output vectors as the evaluation criterion for the image similarity metric.

2. Evaluation of Neurological Function in Alzheimer’s Disease

Due to the continuous growth of the aging population in China, the number of patients with AD is increasing, and an accurate and refined disease stage evaluation of AD has become a critical problem in clinical treatment. Clinically, AD begins with lesions on the brain. However, patients often do not notice any associated changes initially, and only after years of accumulation do patients exhibit obvious symptoms. Moreover, doctors cannot simply use medical imaging and clinical diagnostic data to diagnose the patient’s real situation. Usually, physicians evaluate the neurological function of the patients to diagnose the stage of AD. Currently, one of the main methods for this purpose is neuropsychological testing, which allows physicians to measure the neurological function of patients by observing their performance in tasks involving multiple brain functions, such as movement, language, attention, memory, and thinking, and quantitatively evaluating their neurological function to obtain a score within a certain range ^[8]^[9]^[10]^[11]^[12]^[13]. The common traditional neuropsychological tests include the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ^[8], Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) ^[9], Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) ^[10], Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-COG) ^[11], and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) ^[12]. The MMSE primarily screens for cognitive impairment by quizzing both orientation and memory, whereas the CDR screens for mild cognitive impairment and classifies clinical dementia by quantifying life skills. Although neuropsychological tests can visually reflect different aspects of patients’ brain function, each scale suffers from the problem of incomplete evaluation of neurological function due to different emphases on neurological function evaluation, which in turn affects the diagnosis of the severity of the disease. At the same time, the traditional psychiatric rating scales utilize a question-and-answer format with cooperation between physicians and patients, which may lead to a lack of patient cooperation during the evaluation stage, and the score is also affected by the biased subjectivity of the physician.

With the rapid development of medical imaging technology in recent years, neuroimaging has gradually become one of the main methods to evaluate the neurological function of patients, with structural MRI being the most frequently used ^[14]^[15]. Structural MRI is a mature medical imaging technique, which has become another important method for physicians to evaluate the AD stage of patients because of its safety, non-invasiveness, reproducibility, and sensitivity to morphological changes in the brain. During AD, the patient’s brain atrophy gradually increases ^[16]. Based on this characteristic, physicians usually assess the patient’s condition based on the degree of brain atrophy and the volume of gray and white matter in the sMRI images; however, due to the individual differences of patients, it is difficult for physicians to accurately diagnose the disease progression of patients.

3. Alzheimer’s Diagnosis Based on Deep Learning

With the great popularity of deep learning, many researchers have tried to apply this approach to study the pathogenesis of AD, diagnose the stages of AD, and so on. For example, Suk et al. ^[17] combined MRI, PET, MMSE, and other data to train a classifier and reported promising experimental results in their paper; Ortiz et al. ^[18] achieved more than 90% accuracy on AD and Normal Control (NC) classification problems by training multiple classifiers followed by voting; Lian et al. ^[5] proposed a hierarchical fully convolution network to automatically identify local regions with the discriminatory ability in whole-brain sMRI, and on this basis, multi-scale feature representation was integrated to construct a hierarchical classification model for AD diagnosis.

So far, many studies have achieved good results on the classification problem of AD, but it is not enough to just solve the classification problem. The discrete label obtained by prediction lacks information on disease-stage changes. Few studies have applied deep learning methods to the problem of neurological function evaluation in AD; however, some studies use contrastive learning strategies to evaluate the severity of other diseases. For example, Li et al. ^[19] applied the contrastive learning strategy to continuous disease severity evaluation and disease change detection in retinopathy and osteoarthritis, and the output of the trained twin neural network achieved a correlation of more than 0.85 with the expert sort order on the 100-image test dataset ranked by experts; Li et al. ^[20] applied the contrastive learning strategy to the detection of psoriasis severity and located skin lesions in the image. The severity scores obtained by the trained network framework achieved better results than the severity index method commonly used in psoriasis. Contrastive learning has the potential to solve the problem of neurological function evaluation in AD. In general, deep learning has achieved better results than traditional methods in diagnosing the stage of AD; however, no deep learning method is available for the problem of neurological function evaluation in AD.

References

Thies, W.; Bleiler, L. 2013 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2013, 9, 208–245.
Zhou, Z.; Sodha, V.; Rahman Siddiquee, M.M.; Feng, R.; Tajbakhsh, N.; Gotway, M.B.; Liang, J. Models genesis: Generic autodidactic models for 3d medical image analysis. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2019, 22nd International Conference, Shenzhen, China, 13–17 October 2019.
Saini, M.; Susan, S. VGGIN-Net: Deep Transfer Network for Imbalanced Breast Cancer Dataset. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2023, 20, 752–762.
Khader, F.; Mueller-Franzes, G.; Arasteh, S.T.; Han, T.; Haarburger, C.; Schulze-Hagen, M.; Schad, P.; Engelhardt, S.; Baebler, B.; Foersch, S. Medical Diffusion--Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models for 3D Medical Image Generation. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2211.03364.
Lian, C.; Liu, M.; Zhang, J.; Shen, D. Hierarchical fully convolutional network for joint atrophy localization and Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis using structural MRI. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2018, 42, 880–893.
Shao, W.; Peng, Y.; Zu, C.; Wang, M.; Zhang, D.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Hypergraph based multi-task feature selection for multimodal classification of Alzheimer’s disease. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 2020, 80, 101663.
Saratxaga, C.L.; Moya, I.; Picón, A.; Acosta, M.; Moreno-Fernandez-De-Leceta, A.; Garrote, E.; Bereciartua-Perez, A. MRI deep learning-based solution for Alzheimer’s disease prediction. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 902.
Folstein, M.F.; Folstein, S.E.; Mchugh, P.R. “Mini-Mental State”: A Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State of Patients for the Clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 1975, 12, 189–198.
Berg, L. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Psychopharmacol. Bull. 1988, 24, 637.
Pfeffer, R.I.; Kurosaki, T.T.; Harrah, C.H.; Chance, J.M.; Filos, S. Measurement of Functional Activities in Older Adults in the Community. J. Gerontol. 1982, 37, 323–329.
Rosen, W.G.; Mohs, R.C.; Davis, K.L. A New Rating Scale for Alzheimer’s Disease. Am. J. Psychiatry 1984, 141, 1356–1364.
Schmidt, M. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test: A Handbook; Western Psychological Services: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1996.
Prasher, V.; Farooq, A.; Holder, R. The Adaptive Behaviour Dementia Questionnaire (ABDQ): Screening questionnaire for dementia in Alzheimer’s disease in adults with Down syndrome. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2004, 25, 385–397.
Dickerson, B.C. Advances in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging-based biomarkers for Alzheimer disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2010, 2, 21.
Zhou, Y.; Tan, C.; Wen, D.; Sun, H.; Han, W.; Xu, Y. The biomarkers for identifying preclinical Alzheimer’s disease via structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2016, 8, 92.
Qing, Z.; Chen, F.; Lu, J.; Lv, P.; Li, W.; Liang, X.; Wang, M.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, B.; et al. Causal structural covariance network revealing atrophy progression in Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2021, 42, 3950–3962.
Heung-Il, S. Deep Learning-Based Feature Representation for AD/MCI Classification. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. MICCAI 2013, 16, 583–590.
Andres, O. Ensembles of Deep Learning Architectures for the Early Diagnosis of the Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Neural Syst. 2016, 26, 1650025.
Li, M.D.; Chang, K.; Bearce, B.; Chang, C.Y.; Huang, A.J.; Campbell, J.P.; Brown, J.M.; Singh, P.; Hoebel, K.V.; Erdogmus, D.; et al. Siamese neural networks for continuous disease severity evaluation and change detection in medical imaging. NPJ Digit. Med. 2020, 3, 48.
Li, Y.; Wu, Z.; Zhao, S.; Wu, X.; Kuang, Y.; Yan, Y.; Ge, S.; Wang, K.; Fan, W.; Chen, X.; et al. PSENet: Psoriasis severity evaluation network. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. 2020, 34, 800–807.

© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Upload a video for this entry

Information

Subjects: Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence

Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :

Yike Zhang

Wenliang Fan

Xi Chen

Wei Li

View Times: 206

Update Date: 11 Aug 2023

Table of Contents

Video Upload Options

Confirm

1. Introduction

2. Evaluation of Neurological Function in Alzheimer’s Disease

3. Alzheimer’s Diagnosis Based on Deep Learning

References