Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1127 2023-07-14 13:50:37 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 1127 2023-07-18 05:58:42 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Hung, J.; Chen, J. ChatGPT. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46818 (accessed on 25 June 2024).
Hung J, Chen J. ChatGPT. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46818. Accessed June 25, 2024.
Hung, Jason, Jackson Chen. "ChatGPT" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46818 (accessed June 25, 2024).
Hung, J., & Chen, J. (2023, July 14). ChatGPT. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46818
Hung, Jason and Jackson Chen. "ChatGPT." Encyclopedia. Web. 14 July, 2023.
ChatGPT
Edit

ChatGPT is a human–artificial intelligence (AI) interaction application that was released on 30 April 2022. Since then, ChatGPT has been popularized worldwide rapidly. ChatGPT, in part, is capable of answering a wide variety of human-asked questions in ample domains of knowledge. ChatGPT also contains a function that automatically writes an essay in fewer than minutes. ChatGPT is, therefore, seen as a revolutionized instrument that helps students complete their coursework and assessments. 

ChatGPT artificial intelligence academic learning education integrity

1. Introduction

With the use of ChatGPT, students can be provided with personalized, reliable and specialized guidance in completing schoolwork on behalf of the academic learners themselves. Ranging from a subject-specific query to a general academic issue, ChatGPT can deliver a tailor-made response/solution in fewer than minutes, reducing the amount of human effort to complete school assignments to a significant extent. ChatGPT, in addition, is always accessible. Regardless of the time zones and locations users follow or reside in, respectively, they do not face any constraints that bar them from using ChatGPT to help complete coursework or assessments (Baidoo and Ansah 2023). As many ChatGPT applications are either freely accessible or require a very small payment to use, instrumentalizing such technology to facilitate academic fulfilment is a cost-effective approach (Mhlanga 2023). Even if students are not financially independent or advantaged, they should be able to afford the use of ChatGPT to assist in their completion of academic tasks.
ChatGPT also contains ample languages as media of instructions. Even if students need to complete their academic tasks in languages other than English, the application should be helpful to provide instant academic advice and assistance. Not only is ChatGPT a linguistically compatible application, it is also culturally inclusive that helps answer queries based on cultural contexts (Kasneci et al. 2023). As a result, the convenience, accessibility. and inclusivity of ChatGPT have propelled its popularity in academic learning. It is noteworthy that ChatGPT, in addition to answering academic questions, can edit and proofread academic essays (Lecler et al. 2023). Users are able to benefit from ChatGPT from the early stages of research and planning to the final stage of preparing their work for submission. Given all these benefits, not only is the rapid popularization of ChatGPT sparking international attention but concerns about academic and research integrity have been raised owing to how the revolutionized application interrupts students’ academic dedication (Shiri 2023).

2. Risks of Using ChatGPT

As an AI-powered interactive platform, ChatGPT offers ample benefits that are conducive to students’ learning, development and self-growth, so far as such technology is appropriately used (Yan 2023). However, when ChatGPT is not used aptly, a range of risks may be posed that harm the interests of students, teachers and schools.
A primary concern is that students overly relying on ChatGPT to complete essays and coursework may be at risk of violating the plagiarism rules (Anders 2023). ChatGPT generates responses to the queries of students based on existing data, there is a high possibility that students using the application to complete academic work would inadvertently include content that is copied from existing, published sources (Choi et al. 2023). Those violating plagiarism are accused of significant academic misconduct and may potentially be subject to school punishment. Students are supposed to, at most, use ChatGPT as an assistance tool to help guide their thinking and research process in order to help facilitate their own development of essays or other academic work. However, given the laziness and irresponsibility of a portion of students, these ChatGPT users may directly copy the AI-generated responses to answer academic assessment questions (Khalil and Er 2023). Not only do these students lose the opportunity to develop their critical thinking and independent learning skills, but they are also performing academic misconduct that should be punitively prohibited.
These students, over time, may be increasingly dependent on ChatGPT for the completion of their academic assignments. These students, in the long run, lose the opportunity to accumulate their pool of knowledge and problem-solving ability. Being overly dependent on ChatGPT to complete assessments, in addition, hinders students from building their creativity and long-term cognitive development, harming their overall academic, social and career performance if ChatGPT is not applicable in any setting (Rudolph et al. 2023).
Those abusing ChatGPT as a shortcut to completing school tasks may miss out on valuable opportunities to develop their collaboration and communication skills too. With the availability of ChatGPT, students may be less willing to seek help from their teachers, peers or parents, as they believe the AI-powered programme is able to come up with a (non-)academic solution instantly. The loss of opportunities to sharpen their collaboration and communication skills limits their ability to work effectively in groups—a needed criterion for success in ample professional fields (Arif et al. 2023).
Using ChatGPT aptly can help academic learners complete their tasks more cost-effectively and in a timely manner. However, when academic learners unduly depend on the AI-powered platform to complete academic assignments, their levels of independence are likely to diminish. Therefore, the use of ChatGPT, despite the notable benefits, has been sparking international concern.

3. Should ChatGPT Be Regulated?

These concerns lead to the consideration of whether the use of ChatGPT should be tightly regulated. In today’s climate, online education has been expanding massively (Firat 2023). The use of technological platforms to facilitate academic learning and development has been growingly common. However, why the use of ChatGPT has been drawing a raft of controversies is because, unlike alternative technological tools, users may exploit such an AI-powered tool to challenge academic integrity. The purpose of academic learning is not to achieve impressively high scores, but to gain critical thinking and problem-solving skills that are conducive to students’ lifelong development. If academic learners solely or primarily rely on ChatGPT to complete coursework and assignments, they are wasting the opportunities to develop these skills in favor of their development and growth (Iskender 2023).
Inappropriately using ChatGPT also poses ethical considerations (Sallam 2023). As said, some students may lazily cheat on coursework or assignments by submitting plagiarized work. Such an ethical issue violates the purpose of learning and damages the academic conduct that all students should comply with in educational settings. At higher-level education, students may logically be given more rights and higher flexibility to use ChatGPT when completing their academic work. However, at lower levels, students may not necessarily have the maturity and awareness of how to aptly use AI-powered technology while, simultaneously, building their own knowledge pool and independent thinking, critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
While ChatGPT is a helpful tool to enhance students’ academic learning progress and efficiency, the technological tool should not be used as a subtitle for academic diligence, problem-solving and critical thinking (Dis et al. 2023). Appropriate policies should be set up in academia accordingly to help educators ensure that academic and ethical integrity is maintained by students.

References

  1. Baidoo, David, and Leticia Ansah. 2023. Education in the Era of Generative Artifical Intellignece (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4337484 (accessed on 11 April 2023).
  2. Mhlanga, David. 2023. Open AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT towards Lifelong Learning. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4354422 (accessed on 12 April 2023).
  3. Kasneci, Enkelejda, Kathrin Seßler, Stefan Küchemann, Maria Bannert, Daryna Dementieva, Frank Fischer, Urs Gasser, Georg Groh, Stephan Günnemann, Eyke Hüllermeier, and et al. 2023. ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences 103: 102274.
  4. Lecler, Augustin, Loïc Duron, and Philippe Soyer. 2023. Revolutionising Radiology with GPT-Based Models: Current Applications, Future Possibilities and Limitations of ChatGPT. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging.
  5. Shiri, Ali. 2023. ChatGPT and Academic Integrity. Information Matters 3: 1–5. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4360052 (accessed on 12 April 2023).
  6. Yan, Da. 2023. Impact of ChatGPT on Learners in a L2 Writing Practicum: An Exploratory Investigation. Education and Information Technologies.
  7. Anders, Brent. 2023. Is Using ChatGPT Cheating, Plagiarism, Both, Neither, or Forward Thinking? Patterns 4: 1–2.
  8. Choi, Jonathan, Kristin Hickman, Amy Monahan, and Daniel Schwarcz. 2023. ChatGPT Goes to Law School. Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 23-03. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4335905 (accessed on 10 April 2023).
  9. Khalil, Mohammad, and Erkan Er. 2023. Will ChatGPT Get You Caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04335 (accessed on 12 April 2023).
  10. Rudolph, Jürgen, Samson Tan, and Shannon Tan. 2023. ChatGPT: Bullshit Spewer or the End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education. Ed-Tech Reviews 6: 1–22.
  11. Arif, Taha, Uzair Munaf, and Ibtehaj Haque. 2023. The Future of Medical Education and Research: Is ChatGPT a Blessing or Blight in Disguise? Medical Education Online 28: 218052.
  12. Firat, Mehmet. 2023. Integrating AI Applications into Learning Management Systems to Enhance E-Learning. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning 4: 1–14.
  13. Iskender, Ali. 2023. Holy or Unholy? Interview with Open AI’s ChatGPT. European Journal of Tourism Research 34: 3414.
  14. Sallam, Malik. 2023. ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare 11: 887.
  15. Dis, Eva, Johan Bollen, Willem Zuidema, Robert Rooij, and Claudi Bockting. 2023. ChatGPT: Five Priorities for Research. Nature 614: 224–6.
More
Information
Subjects: Social Issues
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : ,
View Times: 402
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 18 Jul 2023
1000/1000
Video Production Service