Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Bror Jonsson
 -- 4191 2023-06-29 15:19:04 |
2 layout
Camila Xu
 + 3 word(s) 4194 2023-06-30 02:05:43 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Jonsson, B. Thermal Effects on Ecological Traits of Salmonids. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46224 (accessed on 27 July 2024).
Jonsson B. Thermal Effects on Ecological Traits of Salmonids. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46224. Accessed July 27, 2024.
Jonsson, Bror. "Thermal Effects on Ecological Traits of Salmonids" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46224 (accessed July 27, 2024).
Jonsson, B. (2023, June 29). Thermal Effects on Ecological Traits of Salmonids. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46224
Jonsson, Bror. "Thermal Effects on Ecological Traits of Salmonids." Encyclopedia. Web. 29 June, 2023.
Thermal Effects on Ecological Traits of Salmonids
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/fishes8070337

A thermal window bounded by the upper and lower incipient lethal temperatures (UILT and LILT) determines where salmonids can survive. For most salmonids, LILT is close to 0 and UILT is between 20 and 30 °C. UILT and LILT are influenced by the acclimation temperature. Thermal tolerance is affected by fish size and ambient oxygen content, which decreases with increasing temperature.

adaptive developmental programming behaviour climate

1. Introduction

The global climate is gradually becoming more variable and warmer. Mean surface temperature has increased by ca. 1 °C during the last 100 years and is expected to increase even faster towards 2100 [1][2]. Climate change is one of the reasons why animal populations decline, and local extinctions occur at the warmest part of their distribution areas [3]. Fish are vulnerable to temperature increases because their body temperature varies with that of the surrounding water, and the oxygen content in water is low and decreases when the water becomes warmer [4]. Higher temperatures also have sublethal effects, such as changes in biochemical reactions in the body and ecological traits such as growth, body size, age at maturity and behaviour [5]. Many of the ecological changes in species are linked to changes in life history and behavioural traits.
Salmonidae, with subfamilies Coregoninae (freshwater whitefishes), Thymallinae (graylings), and Salmoninae (trout, salmon, charr, lenoks, and taimens), are globally distributed in fresh water and as anadromous fish migrating in sea water [6]. This is an important fish family not only economically but also culturally and ecologically [7]. These species provide food for millions of people, as well as recreation and sport, and they play key roles in ecosystem functioning and health [8][9]. However, many salmonid species are in decline because of a multitude of human-induced pressures including climate warming [10][11][12][13]. For instance, brown trout (Salmo trutta L., 1759) has been in strong decline in southern Europe because of climate warming and an increased prevalence of extremely warm events [14][15][16]. Many other salmonids also show strong climate-associated declines, such as chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Walbaum, 1792) [17], bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus Suckley, 1859) [18], Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus L., 1759) [19] and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L., 1759) [20][21].
Climate warming concerns Salmonidae because they are cold water species with high oxygen demands. Oxygen has low solubility in water, and dissolved O2 content in fully saturated water decreases by approximately 2% per 1°C increase in temperature within the thermal niche of salmonids [22]. The species become stressed when the temperature increases above their normal thermal niche and go extinct if temperatures increase too quickly or too much [23]. The optimal temperatures for growth of the juveniles of most species are around 15 °C, and thermal stress and death occur between 20 and 30 °C (Table 1).
Table 1. Thermal sensitivity of selected salmonids. Optimal temperature for growth, upper critical maximum temperature at which death is almost instantaneous and upper incipient critical temperature over which the juveniles do not feed and eventually die with sources of reference.
Species Optimal Temperature for Growth (°C) Upper Critical Maximum Temperature (°C) Upper Incipient Critical Temperature (°C) References
Atlantic salmon Salmo salar 16–20 28–33 27 [24][25]
Brown trout Salmo trutta 13–17 26–30 22–25 [25][26][27][28]
Rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792) 15–19 30 24–27 [29][30][31][32]
Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 15–19 29 25 [33]
Sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum, 1759) 15   23–26 [34][35]
Cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkia (Richardson, 1836) 13–14 28 19–25 [29][36][37]
Coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch (Walbaum, 1792) 12–15 29 25–26 [33][38]
Chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta (Walbaum, 1792) 12–14 32–34 22–24 [33][38][39]
Brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis (Mitchill, 1814) 12–16 28–31 25 [36][40][41][42]
Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus (L.) 14–17 26–27 22–23 [25][43][44]
Whitespotted charr Salvelinus leucomaenis (Pallas, 1814)     26–28 [45]
Lake trout Salvelinus namaycush (Walbaum, 1792) 12 28–29 24 [46][47][48][49]
Bull trout Salvelinus confluentus 12–16 25–29 21 [41][42][44]
Dolly varden Salvelinus malma (Walbaum, 1792)     22–23 [45]
European grayling Thymallus thymallus (L., 1759) 17   21 [50]
Arctic grayling Thymallus arcticus (Pallas, 1776)   29 23–25 [51][52]
Individuals have a limited ability to face thermal stress and adjust to rapidly changing temperature. Consequently, populations may decline, extirpate, or even go extinct when the climate changes quickly [53][54][55][56]. Fish are ectotherms, and their metabolic and developmental rates, as well as behaviour, are strongly affected by their ambient temperature. However, owing to heritability and phenotypic plasticity, vulnerability varies among individuals and populations [57]. Variations in genetic structure, composition and function influence the capacity of individuals and populations to endure warmer conditions [55][58], and individual variations in thermal tolerance have important implications for the vulnerability to both short-term extreme heat waves and long-term, gradual warming [53]. In addition, thermal sensitivity varies ontogenetically. Young, highly oxygen-requiring stages are more sensitive to warming than older stages [59]. Furthermore, the rate of change in body temperature is inversely related to the mass of the fish, making small salmonids more susceptible to variations in water temperature than larger conspecifics [60]. Embryos are also more sensitive to thermal stress than advanced stages because of their rapid formation of tissues, structures, and organs [61].
Thermal limits increase with increasing acclimation temperature but only to a certain point. For instance, the upper incipient critical temperature (cf. Table 1) of brown trout increases from 20 to 25 °C as the acclimation temperature increases from 0 to 18 °C, but it does not increase any further at higher acclimation temperatures [60]. The incipient critical temperature defines a tolerance zone that is stressful, but the fish can stay alive for a considerable length of time in even warmer water. However, outside the tolerance zone, the thermal stress is lethal. The upper critical maximum temperature is the temperature at which death is almost instantaneous, i.e., the limit of the critical range.
Phenotypic plasticity can buffer against the immediate impacts of thermal stress and reduce the sensitivity of individuals [3]. Phenotypic plasticity may develop as a knock-on effect, which is the ability of a genotype to later express alternative phenotypes in response to environmental differences [46]. Knock-on effects consist of cues or imprints experienced in a sensitive phase, transferred as a parental effect, or induced early in life, which change developmental rates, activities, or resource use [62]. Salmonids appear to be sensitive to environmental knock-on effects during embryogenesis or at the alevin stage, with later effects on morphology, life history, physiology, and behaviour. This plasticity may be an epigenetic effect [62]. Epigenetic effects are transcriptional regulators of DNA. Methylations of CpG sites in DNA sequences are the most extensively studied mechanism of epigenetic effects in ecology [63]. Methylation of CpG sites in regulatory regions of DNA downregulates genetic expression, and demethylation upregulates genetic expressions [64]. Other epigenetic mechanisms include histone modifications and microRNA, which alter the transcriptional capacities of genomes [63]. However, little is known about how phenotypic plasticity is genetically or epigenetically regulated.

2. Metabolic Rates and Aerobic Scope

Metabolic rates, which are the sum of all energy-yielding processes, vary with temperature and reflect the energetic cost of living [65][66]. The standard metabolic rate (SMR) is a measure of the energy required to maintain essential functions, such as breathing and blood circulation. SMR increases approximately proportionally with water temperature [67] and decreases with increasing body mass. Mass-specific SMR declines as a negative power function of body mass as organisms grow to maturity [68]. SMR should be measured in unfed and not growing fish, as both digestion of food and growth use energy, which may influence metabolic measurements [69]. For shorter time intervals, such as weeks or a few months, the mass-specific SMR of a salmonid is stable and repeatable and may hold even under variable thermal conditions [66][70]. For instance, McCarthy [71] demonstrated the stability of SMR by correlating the mass-specific SMR of individual Atlantic salmon measured 5 and 22 weeks after first feeding (June and October, respectively). This stability makes SMR a useful measurement when considering physiological traits underlying organismal performance [66].
The maximum metabolic rate (MMR) is the maximum rate of oxygen consumption that fish can achieve and use to oxidize matter for ATP generation without accumulating oxygen debt. MMR increases with temperature until reaching a peak called the pejus temperature; then, it decreases gradually to zero, which is known as the upper critical limit (TCrit) [60][72]. Pejus temperature corresponds to the point at which individuals start to lose individual performance capacity. At TCrit, the survival of fish is time-limited, and they live in a passive state [3]. The difference between the maximum and standard metabolic rates is called the aerobic scope (AS = MMR-SMR) [72]. AS corresponds to the highest level of energy available for activity. Individuals with higher aerobic scope are better able to take advantages of high food abundance [66] and have improved locomotor ability [73], boldness and competitive dominance, as well as increased levels of territorial aggression [74]. The optimal temperature of a species or population is the temperature resulting in the highest AS and determines their capacity to carry out functions such as foraging, growth, competition, patrolling, immune reactions, and predator defence. As these activities are temperature-dependent and influence spatial distributions and phenology of populations, they are important in contexts of climate change [75][76].
Fish can only survive for long periods of time within temperature ranges where AS is positive. The upper thermal limit is set by the physiological limits of aerobic capacity. Thermal limit diversity among populations with different adaptive histories is likely a result of adaptations in aerobic capacity to different environmental temperature regimes. Thus, thermal tolerance may vary among populations within species as a response to past selection. The ability to cope with global warming is determined by the upper thermal tolerance limit, and populations exposed to high temperatures over their evolutionary history exhibit higher thermal tolerance than conspecific populations developed under colder thermal regimes [77]. For instance, Eliason et al. [78] reported that sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in the Fraser River that experienced more challenging migratory environments have greater AS than those with less arduous migrations and that variations in AS are consistent with the historic river temperature ranges for each local population. Thus, thermal adaptation appears to occur at a local scale, with population-specific thermal limits set by physiological limitations in aerobic performance.
Variable environmental conditions influence metabolic rates. Oligney-Hébert et al. [79] compared the metabolic rates of juvenile Atlantic salmon from two rivers with different thermal regimes and acclimated the fish to either 15 or 20 °C and constant (±0.5 °C) or diel fluctuating (±2.5 °C) water temperature. Fluctuating temperature at 15 ± 2.5 °C did not influence SMR relative to stable temperature (15 ± 0.5 °C). However, diel temperature fluctuation at 20 ± 2.5 °C increased the SMR of Atlantic salmon from the warmer river by 33.7% and in the colder river by 8 % compared with the same fish acclimated to a constant temperature of 20 ± 0.5 °C. Thus, the mean temperature to which the juveniles is exposed may affect their responses to diel temperature fluctuation, and this response may vary between populations originating from rivers with different natural thermal regimes.
On the other hand, intraspecific variations in AS need not be caused by genetic differences. Instead, this may be a phenotypically plastic response induced by previously experienced differences in thermal climate [80]. For instance, Cook et al. [81] reported that temperatures experienced by brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) embryos affected body mass and routine metabolic rates as free-swimming fry. Furthermore, prehatching temperature influenced the metabolic rate of brown trout. Durtsche et al. [82] found that the SMR, MMR and AS of young brown trout (parr) were reduced when incubated as embryos in 3°C warmer water. This result is consistent with the counter-gradient variation hypothesis (CGV), according to which phenotypic variation—in this case, variation in metabolic rates—is inversely related to thermal conditions experienced by the organisms in early life [83]. This hypothesis was originally proposed in relation to altitudinal or latitudinal gradients [84]. Thus, the temperature experienced when the fish develop within the eggshell may preadapt individuals to life in either colder or warmer temperatures. Trout experiencing cold environments as embryos prepare for life in a cold environment and have higher metabolic rates at the same temperature than those that developed in warmer water. Accordingly, those that develop in cold water compensate for negative effects of low temperatures. A warm early environment favours low metabolic rates later, enabling fishes to conserve energy in an otherwise costly environment. Thus, direct environmental influences counteract inherited differences among natural populations growing up under different thermal conditions through a process of thermal plasticity. There may also be sensitive periods later in life during which SMR is programmed. For instance, Álvarez et al. [85] found a negative correlation between the temperature experienced by brown trout fry during the first 2 months after yolk resorption and SMR later. Thus, exposure to low temperatures at an early stage in life increases the temperature-dependent SMR. Such an early influence on metabolic rate has consequences for later growth, feeding and locomotor activity.

3. Growth

The aerobic scope represents the capacity of organisms to concurrently supply oxygen and energy for swimming, food digestion, absorption, assimilation (specific dynamic action SDA) and growth. High energy intake leads to faster growth, although SDA also increases with higher SMR food consumption and assimilation [86][87]. Typically, increased growth is advantageous because it protects against gape-limited predators and increases competitive ability and reproductive capacity [88]. However, a cost of faster growth may be reduced life span. There is still little information about how individual fish share their resources between these functions and restrict meal sizes to maximize growth and minimize the probability of death.
Like AS, growth rate and food consumption increase with temperature to a maximum point (optimal temperature for growth (TOpt)) at which oxygen availability starts limiting a further increase and the growth rate starts to decline [24][68]. The optimal temperature depends on the oxygen content in the water. For individual fish, TOpt is reduced if the water is not fully saturated and increased if the water is supersaturated [89]. Temperature-dependent reaction norms for growth and food consumption are maximized at approximately the same temperature [24], and the maximum point decreases with decreasing food consumption [90][91]. Therefore, maximum growth of brown trout is reached at 13 °C for invertebrate and pellet feeding and 16 °C for fish feeding on conspecifics [26][27].
There are small differences in TOpt among salmonid species, and all have relatively low thermal tolerances associated with their high oxygen requirements (Table 1). Typically, the optimal temperature for growth is round 15 °C and is lowest in lake trout (12 °C) and highest in Atlantic salmon (16–20 °C). There are intraspecific variations in thermal performance among studies, which may be partly due to methodological variation across studies, such as variation in size of test fish, acclimation temperature, oxygen content in water and other stressful conditions [89]. In addition, there may be some genetic variation in thermal performance [92][93]; however, when experimental conditions are similar, intraspecific variation in thermal performance is small. Debes et al. [94] investigated population differences and within-population genetic variation and plasticity in thermal performance traits of Atlantic salmon reared under common-garden conditions and found heritability for growth, condition and CTMax. However, with increasing acclimation temperature, differences in the heritability of CTMax diminished. CTMax and body size were negatively correlated at the genetic and phenotypic levels, and there was indirect evidence of a positive correlation between maximum growth and thermal performance breadth for growth. Thus, population differences in thermal performance and plasticity may represent a genetic resource, in addition to the within-population genetic variance, to facilitate thermal adaptation.
Optimal temperature for growth decreases with increasing fish size [73][95]. Therefore, in lakes and at sea, large individuals often tend to live deeper and in colder water than smaller conspecifics [95][96], and small individuals may show increased growth at the same temperature as larger conspecifics experience negative growth because of lower individual optimal temperature [97]. The effect of rearing temperature on the relationship between growth and the metabolic rate of brown trout was studied by Archer et al. [98]. For 15 months, they kept study groups in either cold water ranging between 5.9 °C and 16.4 °C or in 1.8 °C warmer water (7.9–18.2 °C). They found that SMR was positively related to growth in the cool water but negatively related to growth in the warmer water. The opposite patterns were found for MMR and growth associations (positive in warm and negative in the cool regime). Mean SMR but not MMR was lower in warm regimes within both populations. Thus, there appears to be a phenotypic plastic reaction in the relationship between growth and metabolic rate depending on the thermal regime of the fish. Furthermore, a study by Finstad and Jonsson [99] demonstrated that embryo temperature had a knock-on effect on the growth of young Atlantic salmon. Young juveniles (parr) grew faster at the optimal temperature when the eggs were incubated in 7.2 ± 0.6 SD instead of 2.6 °C ± 0.4 SD water. A higher temperature during egg incubation also increases smolt size at 1 year of age and size at maturity at 2 years of age in Atlantic salmon, but it showed no effect on mass specific growth at sea after smolting [100][101] (Appendix A in original paper). Higher egg incubation temperature appeared to stimulate the fish to feed more at 1 year of age and therefore grow faster as young juveniles; however, this growth effect in the salmon disappeared after smolting.
Although the optimal temperature for growth declines with increasing body size, embryos, and alevins, which are very small, have narrower thermal limits and are more vulnerable to high temperatures than larger fish. Early life stages are highly oxygen-demanding, and high temperatures may have a negative effect on cellular functions through thermally induced oxygen diffusion limitation [102]. In addition, cell proliferation, migration, differentiation, and apoptosis (programmed cell death) are adversely affected by elevated embryo temperature. In particular, the development of the central nervous system and the notochord is highly susceptible to high temperatures [103]. The development of the notochord is thermally sensitive because of effects on the sheath cells [104]. These cells accumulate misfolded protein at elevated temperatures, leading to structural failure of the notochord and other anatomic defects in the embryo, causing malformations and death. Thus, both oxygen limitations and malformations during foetal development are causes of the high temperature sensitivity of embryos and larvae.
There are inherited differences in reaction norms of temperature-dependent growth among conspecific populations of Atlantic salmon, brown trout and Arctic charr [24][27][43] that may also hold for other salmonid species. Juveniles from large-sized, late-maturing salmonids grow better at the same temperature than those from populations of small-sized, late-maturing conspecifics. Growth differences possibly reflect different personalities of the fish, as offspring of large, late-maturing fish also feed more at the same temperature than those from populations of earlier-maturing conspecifics [24]. The optimal temperature for growth is similar among Norwegian populations of Atlantic salmon, although the thermal regimes of the rivers vary. Thus, differences in maximum growth among conspecific populations appear to reflect habitat differences rather than differences in thermal regimes [43][105][106].

4. Adult Size

According to the temperature–size rule for ectotherms, individuals maintained at a lower temperature grow more slowly but become larger at sexual maturity than those maintained at a higher temperature [107]. This is at least partly because age at maturity is growth-dependent, and slower growth means delayed maturation [108][109][110]. However, this does not necessarily mean that those that live in warm water are smaller in mean size than those from colder environments. This depends on the difference in annual length increment at the two temperatures and the fraction of the population that mature younger in the warmer water. Experimentally, Jonsson et al. [109][110] showed that the probability of that Atlantic salmon attained maturity for the first time during their second year in sea water increased with increasing growth rate during the last winter before maturation. Increased summer temperature had no additional effect. Atlantic salmon reared at elevated temperature attained maturity at a larger body mass and exhibited higher mass–length ratios than those of similar age reared in colder water. Temperature functions similarly to the accelerator of a motor, and higher temperatures induce faster growth if the oxygen supply is sufficient, i.e., below the pejus temperature.
Faster growth requires increased energetic assimilation, and recent findings indicate poorer feeding opportunities of Atlantic salmon in the North Atlantic Ocean resulting in poorer survival, reduced production, and smaller size for their age. However, size at maturity may, on average, be larger in many rivers because the fish attain maturity at an older age because of poorer growth [111][112]. Pacific salmon along the west coast of North America, on the other hand, mature younger with decreased production because of ocean warming, as found in large-scale investigations in Alaska [113][114]. The same declining trends hold for chinook, chum, coho and sockeye salmon. Because of the smaller fish size and reduced production, the effect is reduced nutrient transport from the ocean to rivers and riparian and terrestrial ecosystems [115][116], reduced fisheries value and fewer meals for rural people [114].
Polymorphism with sympatric morphs of different sizes occurs in several salmonids, such as brown trout [117], Sevan trout (Salmo ischchan Kessler, 1877) [118], Arctic charr [119] and freshwater whitefish (Coregonus spp.) [120]. Sympatric phenotypes often occur in pairs, exhibiting a large and a small adult morphotype of the same species [121][122]; however, in some systems, there are more than two sympatric forms. Sevan trout in Lake Sevan, Armenia [118] and Arctic charr in Lake Thingvallavatn, Iceland, exhibit four sympatric morphotypes [118][123]. The morph variation is partly inherited [121], and in several cases, clear genetic foundations of morph differentiation have been demonstrated, along with divergent life histories [120][124]. However, differences in egg incubation temperature may also influence phenotypic differentiation.
Two forms of European whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) segregate vertically in Traunsee, Austria. The forms exhibit different metabolic adaptations and behavioural preferences for different temperatures [125]. In the lake, the two forms diverge by incubating embryos at either 2 °C or 6 °C, i.e., the typical temperature during embryogenesis of the two. Offspring of the two forms were reared and subjected to similar thermal conditions after hatching. The offspring differentiated in muscle growth and body size depending on the egg temperature; offspring incubated as eggs in 2 °C water grew larger than those incubated at 6 °C, regardless of whether their parents were large or small whitefish. The experiment also revealed that muscle hypertrophy (increased fibre size) and hyperplasia (increased fibre number) were affected by the thermal histories. Immunolabeling showed that the cellular mechanisms leading to increased growth after cold incubation were increased proliferation and reduced differentiation rates of muscle precursor cells, most probably associated with epigenetic differences. Thermal plasticity possibly arises from changes in physiological and endocrinological pathways, in which epigenetic regulation is likely to play an essential role [126].
Many salmonids are anadromous in addition to having freshwater living forms. This is, for instance, observed in sockeye salmon, Arctic charr, brown trout and masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou Brevoort, 1856). For masu salmon, Morita et al. [127] showed that these alternative tactics were associated with temperature gradients. The occurrence of mature resident males increased, and the proportion of immature migrant males decreased with increasing temperature in Japanese rivers. They suggested that the change in the ratio of anadromous to freshwater resident males resulted from improved growth opportunities in warmer water. According to Morán and Pérez-Figueroa [128], resident and anadromous male Atlantic salmon differ in DNA methylation, although they are genetically similar. Earlier maturation and freshwater residency may be mediated by epigenetic processes rather than by genetic differences between young fish. How these differences develop is still obscure.

5. Reproductive Traits

Reproductive processes of fish are affected by the environmental temperature. Moderate thermal variation affects endocrine functions and either advance or retard gametogenesis and maturation. Above-normal temperatures may have deleterious effects on reproductive functions, and low temperatures can arrest the maturation process. For instance, in Atlantic salmon females, exposure to elevated temperatures during gametogenesis may impair both gonadal steroid synthesis and hepatic vitellogenin production, alter hepatic oestrogen receptor dynamics and ultimately result in reduced maternal investment and gamete viability [129]. High temperatures during maturation also impair gonadal steroidogenesis and delay or inhibit the preovulatory shift from production of androgens to maturation-inducing steroids. Similar effects are observed in rainbow trout and Arctic charr [129]. In Atlantic salmon, higher temperature may increase maturation of male parr [130][131], although in another study, Baum et al. [132] observed no effect of high temperature on parr maturation. In male Arctic charr and rainbow trout, high temperatures can inhibit spermiation (maturation-inducing steroids [129]), and it is reasonable to assume that the same effect also holds for other salmonid species.
Furthermore, both egg size and fecundity tend to increase with female body size. Thus, in a warmer climate with smaller females, egg sizes decrease. On the other hand, egg size is larger for similarly sized conspecifics spawning in warmer streams [133][134][135]. The transformation from yolk to tissue is less effective under warmer conditions. Large eggs are also favourable under poorer oxygen conditions [136]. Thus, increased egg size may give offspring an adaptive benefit in a warmer climate and should be favoured by natural selection. This is probably the reason why the egg size of salmonids decreases with increasing latitude and altitude [133][135][137][138]. Egg size differences appear to diminish when fish from different populations are reared under common thermal conditions, showing that this trait is phenotypically plastic [133]. Furthermore, egg size is influenced by the temperature that females experience during their own embryogenesis. A higher incubation temperature stimulates females to produce larger eggs as a phenotypically plastic knock-on effect [139][140]. Total ovary mass but not fecundity increases with incubation temperature years earlier. Male gonad mass is also larger in fish incubated in warmer water.
Females retained in warmer water during maturation produce larger eggs. There is also a transgenerational effect of temperature on egg size. Experimentally, Jonsson and Jonsson [140] exhibited that the mass of eggs produced by next-generation females was larger when their mothers experienced warmer water during the last two months of egg maturation relative to similar fish that experienced unheated water. This is possibly caused by an epigenetic modification of the parental fish. In brook trout, using whole-genome bisulphite sequencing, Venney et al. [141] found 188 differentially methylated DNA regions due to parental maturation temperature. Stable intergenerational inheritance of DNA methylation may transfer the epigenetic states to offspring, priming them for a warming environment. This has implications regarding the role of intergenerational epigenetic inheritance in response to climate change.

References

  1. USGCRP. Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment; Wuebbles, D.J., Fahey, D.W., Hibbard, K.A., Dokken, D.J., Stewart, B.C., Maycock, T.K., Eds.; U.S. Global Change Research Program: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; Volume I, pp. 1–470.
  2. NOAA. State of the Climate: Global Climate Report for 2021. WMO 2022, 1290, 1–54.
  3. McKenzie, D.J.; Zhang, Y.; Eliason, E.J.; Schulte, P.M.; Claireaux, G.; Blasco, F.R.; Nati, J.J.H.; Farrell, A.P. Intraspecific variation in tolerance of warming in fishes. J. Fish Biol. 2021, 96, 1536–1551.
  4. Volkoff, H.; Rønnestad, I. Effects of temperature on feeding and digestive processes in fish. Temperature 2020, 7, 307–320.
  5. Schulte, P.M.; Healy, T.M.; Fangue, N.A. Thermal performance curves, phenotypic plasticity, and the time scales of temperature exposure. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2011, 51, 691–702.
  6. Nelson, J.S. Fishes of the World, 4th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006.
  7. Kershner, J.L.; Williams, J.E.; Gresswell, R.E.; Lobón-Cerviá, J. Trout and Char of the World; American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2019.
  8. Bottom, D.L.; Jones, K.K.; Simenstad, C.A.; Smith, C.L. Reconnecting social and ecological resilience in salmon ecosystems. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14, 5.
  9. Watz, J.; Alvén, D.; Andreasson, P.; Aziz, K.; Blixt, M.; Calles, O.; Bjørnås, K.L.; Olsson, I.; Österling, M.; Stålhammar, S.; et al. Atlantic salmon in regulated rivers: Understanding river management through the ecosystem services lens. Fish Fish. 2022, 23, 478–491.
  10. Jonsson, B.; Waples, R.S.; Friedland, K.D. Extinction considerations for diadromous fishes. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 1999, 56, 405–409.
  11. Comte, L.; Buisson, L.; Daufresne, M.; Grenouillet, G. Climate-induced changes in freshwater fish distribution: Observed and predicted trends. Freshw. Biol. 2013, 58, 625–639.
  12. Kovach, R.; Jonsson, B.; Jonsson, N.; Arismendi, I.; Williams, J.E.; Kerchner, J.L.; Al-Chokhachy, R.; Letcher, B.; Muhlfeld, C.C. Climate Change and the Future of Trout and Char. In Trout and Char of the World; American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2019; pp. 685–716.
  13. Muhlfeld, C.C.; Dauwalter, D.C.; D’Angelo, V.S.; Ferguson, A.; Giersch, J.J.; Impson, D.; Koizumi, I.; Kovach, R.; McGinnity, P.; Schöffmann, J.; et al. Global Status of Trout and Char: Conservation Challengers in the Twenty-First Century. In Trout and Char of the World; American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2019; pp. 717–760.
  14. Almodóvar, A.; Nicola, G.G.; Ayllón, D.; Elvira, B. Global warming threatens the persistence of Mediterranean brown trout. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2012, 18, 1549–1560.
  15. Réalis-Doyelle, E.; Pasquet, A.; De Charleroy, D.; Fontaine, P.; Teletchea, F. Strong effects of temperature on the early life stages of a cold stenothermal fish species, brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155487.
  16. Frölicher, T.L.; Laufkötter, C. Emerging risks from marine heat waves. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 650.
  17. Crozier, L.G.; Bruke, B.J.; Chasco, B.E.; Widener, D.L.; Zabel, R.W. Climate change threatens Chinook salmon throughout their life cycle. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 222.
  18. Isaak, D.J.; Luce, C.H.; Rieman, B.E.; Nagel, D.E.; Peterson, E.E.; Horan, D.L.; Parkes, S.; Chandler, G.L. Effects of climate and wildfire on stream temperatures and salmonid thermal habitat in a mountain river network. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20, 1350–1371.
  19. Kelly, S.; Moore, T.N.; de Eyto, E.; Dillane, M.; Goulon, C.; Guillard, J.; Lasne, E.; McGinnity, P.; Poole, R.; Winfield, I.J.; et al. Warming winters threaten peripheral Arctic charr populations of Europe. Clim. Chang. 2020, 63, 599–618.
  20. Nicola, G.G.; Elvira, B.; Jonsson, B.; Ayllón, D.; Almodóvar, A. Local and global climatic drivers of Atlantic salmon decline in southern Europe. Fish. Res. 2018, 198, 78–85.
  21. Almodóvar, A.; Ayllón, D.; Nicola, G.G.; Jonsson, B.; Elvira, B. Climate-driven bio-physical changes in feeding and breeding environments explain the decline of southernmost European Atlantic salmon populations. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 2019, 76, 1581–1595.
  22. Atkins, P.W. Physical Chemistry, 6th ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998.
  23. Gillson, J.P.; Bašić, T.; Davison, P.I.; Riley, W.D.; Talks, L.; Walker, A.M.; Russell, I.C. A review of marine stressors impacting Atlantic salmon Salmo salar, with an assessment of the major threats to English stocks. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2022, 32, 879–919.
  24. Jonsson, B.; Forseth, T.; Jensen, A.J.; Næsje, T.F. Thermal performance in juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Funct. Ecol. 2001, 15, 701–711.
  25. Elliott, J.M.; Elliott, J.A. Temperature requirements of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar, brown trout, Salmo trutta and Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus: Predicting the effects of climate change. J. Fish Biol. 2010, 77, 1793–1817.
  26. Forseth, T.; Jonsson, B. The growth and food ration of piscivorous brown trout (Salmo trutta). Funct. Ecol. 1994, 8, 171–177.
  27. Forseth, T.; Larsson, S.; Jensen, A.J.; Jonsson, B.; Näslund, I.; Berglund, I. Thermal growth performance of juvenile brown trout Salmo trutta: No support for thermal adaptation hypothesis. J. Fish Biol. 2009, 74, 133–149.
  28. Lee, R.M.; Rinne, J.N. Critical thermal maxima of five trout species in the south-western United States. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1980, 109, 632–635.
  29. Bear, E.A.; McMahon, T.E.; Zale, A.V. Comparative thermal requirements of Westslope cutthroat trout and rainbow trout: Implications for species interactions and development of thermal protection standards. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2007, 136, 1113–1121.
  30. Hokanson, K.E.; Kleiner, C.F.; Thorslund, T.W. Effects of constant temperatures and diel temperatures of specific growth and mortality rates and yield of juvelile rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 1977, 34, 639–648.
  31. Railsback, S.F.; Rose, K.A. Bioenergetics modelling of stream trout growth: Temperature and food consumption effects. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1999, 128, 241–256.
  32. Wurtsbaugh, W.A.; Davis, G.E. Effects of temperature and ration level on the growth and food conservation efficiency of Salmo gairdneri, Richardson. J. Fish Biol. 1977, 11, 87–98.
  33. Brett, J.R. Temperature tolerance in young Pacific salmon, genus Oncorhynchus. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 1952, 9, 265–323.
  34. Brett, J.R. Energic responses of salmon to temperature. A study of some thermal relations in the physiology and freshwater ecology of the sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Am. Zool. 1971, 11, 99–113.
  35. Chen, Z.; Anttila, K.; Wu, J.; Whitney, C.K.; Hinch, S.G.; Farrell, A.P. Optimum and maximum temperatures of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) populations hatched at different temperatures. Can. J. Zool. 2013, 91, 265–274.
  36. De Staso, J., III; Rahel, F.J. Influence of water temperature on interactions between juvenile Colorado River cutthroat trout and brook trout in a laboratory stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1994, 123, 289–297.
  37. Dickerson, B.R.; Vinyard, G.L. Effects of high chronic temperatures and diel temperature cycles on the survival and growth of Lahontan cutthroat trout. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1999, 128, 516–521.
  38. Beschta, R.L.; Bilby, R.E.; Brown, G.W.; Holtby, L.B.; Hofstra, T.D. Stream Temperature and Aquatic Habitat: Fisheries and Forestry Interactions. In Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions; Salo, E.O., Cundy, T.W., Eds.; University of Washington, Institute of Forest Resources: Seattle, DC, USA, 1987; Volume 57, pp. 191–232.
  39. Snyder, G.R.; Blahm, T.H. Effects of increased temperature on cold-water organisms. J. Water Pollut. Cont. Fed. 1971, 43, 890–899.
  40. McCormick, J.H.; Hokanson, K.E.F.; Jones, B.R. Effects of temperature on growth and survival of young brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 1972, 29, 1107–1112.
  41. Selong, J.H.; McMahon, T.E.; Zale, A.V.; Barrows, F.T. Effect of temperature on growth and survival of bull trout, with application of an improved method for determining thermal tolerance in fishes. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2001, 130, 1026–1037.
  42. McMahon, T.E.; Zale, A.V.; Barrows, F.T.; Selong, J.H.; Danehy, R.J. Temperature and competition between bull trout and brook trout: A test of the elevation refuge hypothesis. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2007, 136, 1313–1326.
  43. Larsson, S.; Forseth, T.; Berglund, I.; Jensen, A.J.; Näslund, I.; Elliott, J.M.; Jonsson, B. Thermal adaptation of Arctic charr: Experimental studies of growth in eleven charr populations from Sweden, Norway and Britain. Freshw. Biol. 2005, 50, 353–368.
  44. Jobling, M.; Jørgensen, E.H.; Arnesen, A.M.; Ringø, E. Feeding, growth and environmental requirements of Arctic charr: A review of aquaculture potential. Aquacult. Int. 1993, 1, 20–46.
  45. Takami, T.; Kitano, F.; Nakano, S. High water temperature influences on foraging responses and thermal death of dolly varden Salvelinus malma and whitespotted charr S. leucomaenis. Fish. Sci. 1997, 63, 6–8.
  46. Kelly, N.I.; Burness, G.; McDermid, J.L.; Wilson, C.C. Ice age fish in a warming world: Minimal variation in thermal acclimation capacity among lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) populations. Cons. Physiol. 2014, 16, cou025.
  47. Edsall, T.A.; Cleland, J. Optimum temperature for growth and preferred temperatures of age-0 lake trout. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 2000, 20, 804–809.
  48. Gibson, E.S.; Fry, F.E.J. The performance of the lake trout, Salvelinus namaycush, at various levels of temperature and oxygen pressure. Can. J. Zool. 1954, 32, 252–260.
  49. Hasnain, S.S.; Minns, C.K.; Shuter, B.J. Key Ecological Temperature Metrics for Canadian Freshwater Fishes; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Applied Research and Development Branch: Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Canada, 2010; pp. 1–42.
  50. Mallet, J.P.; Charles, S.; Persat, H.; Auger, P. Growth modelling in accordance with daily water temperature in European grayling (Thymallus thymallus L.). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1999, 56, 994–1000.
  51. McLeay, D.J.; Knox, A.J.; Malick, J.G.; Birtwell, I.K.; Hartman, G.; Ennis, G.L. Effects on Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) of short-term exposure to Yukon mining sediments: Laboratory and field studies. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Ott. 1983, 1171, 1–134.
  52. Lohr, S.C.; Byorth, P.A.; Kaya, C.M.; Dwyer, W.P. High temperature tolerances of fluvial Arctic grayling and comparisons with summer river temperatures of the Big Hole River, Montana. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1996, 125, 933–939.
  53. Bennett, S.; Duarte, C.M.; Marbà, N.; Wernberg, T. Integrating within-species variation in thermal physiology into climate change ecology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2019, 374, 20180550.
  54. Burggren, W.W. Inadequacy of typical physiological experimental protocols for investigating consequences of stochastic weather events emerging from global warming. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2019, 316, 318–322.
  55. Pacifici, M.; Foden, W.B.; Visconti, P.; Watson, J.E.M.; Butchart, S.H.M.; Kovacs, K.M.; Rondinini, C. Assessing species vulnerability to climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 215–225.
  56. Thorstad, E.B.; Bliss, D.; Breau, C.; Damon-Randall, K.; Sundt-Hansen, L.E.; Hatfield, E.M.C.; Horsburgh, G.; Hansen, H.; Maoiléidigh, N.Ó.; Sheehan, T.; et al. Atlantic salmon in a rapidly changing environment—Facing the challenges of reduced marine survival and climate. Aquat. Cons. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2021, 31, 2654–2665.
  57. Sparks, M.M.; Westley, P.A.H.; Falke, J.A.; Quinn, T.P. Thermal adaptation and phenotypic plasticity in a warming world: Insights from common garden experiments on Alaskan sockeye salmon. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2017, 23, 5203–5217.
  58. Moran, E.V.; Hartig, F.; Bell, D.M. Intraspecific trait variation across scales: Implications for understanding global change responses. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2016, 22, 137–150.
  59. Dahlke, F.T.; Wohlrab, S.; Butzin, M.; Pörtner, H.-O. Thermal bottlenecks in the life cycle define climate vulnerability of fish. Science 2020, 369, 65–70.
  60. Elliott, J.M. Quantitative Ecology and the Brown Trout; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1994.
  61. Edwards, M.J.; Saunders, R.D.; Shiota, K. Effects of heat on embryos and foetuses. Int. J. Hypertherm. 2003, 19, 295–324.
  62. Jonsson, B.; Jonsson, N.; Hansen, M.M. Knock-on effects of environmental influences during embryonic development of ectothermic vertebrates. Q. Rev. Biol. 2022, 97, 95–139.
  63. Verhoeven, K.J.F.; von Holdt, B.M.; Sork, V.L. Epigenetics in ecology and evolution: What we know and what we need to know. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 1631–1638.
  64. Greenberg, M.V.C.; Bourc’his, D. The diverse roles of DNA methylation in mammalian development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 590–607.
  65. Fry, F.E.J. The Effect of Environmental Factors on the Physiology of Fish. In Fish Physiology VI; Hoar, W.S., Randall, D.J., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1971; pp. 1–98.
  66. Auer, S.K.; Anderson, G.J.; McKelvey, S.; Bassar, R.D.; McLennan, D.; Armstrong, J.D.; Nislow, K.H.; Downie, H.K.; McKelvey, L.; Morgan, T.A.J.; et al. Nutrients from salmon parents alter selection pressures on their offspring. Ecol. Lett. 2018, 21, 287–295.
  67. Norin, T.; Malte, H.; Clark, T.D. Aerobic scope does not predict the performance of a tropical eurythermal fish at elevated temperatures. J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 217, 244–251.
  68. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. Scaling: Why Is Animal Size So Important? Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1984.
  69. Rosenfeldt, J.; Van Leeuwen, T.; Richards, J.; Allen, D. Relationship between growth and standard metabolic rate: Measurement artefacts and implications for habitat use and life-history adaptation in salmonids. J. Anim. Ecol. 2015, 84, 4–20.
  70. O’Connor, K.I.; Taylor, A.C.; Metcalfe, N.B. The stability of standard metabolic rate during a period of food deprivation in juvenile Atlantic salmon. J. Fish Biol. 2005, 57, 41–51.
  71. McCarthy, I.D. Temporal repeatability of relative standard metabolic rate in juvenile Atlantic salmon and its relation to life history variation. J. Fish Biol. 2005, 57, 224–238.
  72. Pörtner, H.-O. Oxygen- and capacity-limitation of thermal tolerance: A matrix for integrating climate-related stressor effects in marine ecosystems. J. Exp. Biol. 2010, 213, 881–893.
  73. Reidy, S.P.; Kerr, S.R.; Nelson, J.A. Aerobic and anaerobic swimming performance of individual Atlantic cod. J. Exp. Biol. 2000, 203, 347–357.
  74. Biro, P.A.; Stamps, J.A. Do consistent individual differences in metabolic rate promote consistent individual differences in behavior? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25, 653–659.
  75. O’Connor, M.I.; Selig, E.R.; Pinsky, M.L.; Altermatt, T. Toward a conceptual synthesis for climate change responses. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 21, 693–703.
  76. Pörtner, H.-O.; Gutt, J. Impacts of climate variability and change on (marine) animals: Physiological underpinnings and evolutionary consequences. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2016, 56, 31–44.
  77. Nati, J.J.H.; Svendsen, M.B.S.; Marras, S.; Killen, S.S.; Steffensen, J.F.; McKenzie, D.J.; Domenici, P. Intraspecific variation in thermal tolerance differs between tropical and temperate fishes. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21272.
  78. Eliason, E.J.; Clark, T.D.; Hague, M.J.; Hanson, L.M.; Gallagher, Z.S.; Jeffries, K.M.; Gale, M.K.; Patterson, D.A.; Hinch, S.G.; Farrell, A.P. Differences in thermal tolerance among sockeye salmon populations. Science 2011, 332, 109–112.
  79. Oliny-Hébert, H.; Senay, C.; Enders, E.C.; Boisclair, D. Effects of diel temperature fluctuation on the standard metabolic rate of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): Influence of acclimation temperature and provenience. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2015, 72, 1306–1315.
  80. Bossdorf, O.; Richards, C.L.; Pigliucci, M. Epigenetics for ecologists. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11, 106–115.
  81. Cook, C.J.; Wilson, C.C.; Burness, G. Impacts of environmental matching on the routine metabolic rate and mass of native and mixed-ancestry brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) fry. Cons. Physiol. 2018, 6, coy023.
  82. Durtsche, R.D.; Jonsson, B.; Greenberg, L.A. Thermal conditions during embryogenesis influence metabolic rates of juvenile brown trout Salmo trutta. Ecosphere 2021, 12, e03374.
  83. Conover, D.; Schultz, E.T. Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995, 10, 248–252.
  84. Levins, R. Evolution in Changing Environments; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1968.
  85. Álvarez, D.; Cano, J.M.; Nicieza, A.G. Microgeographic variation in metabolic rate and energy storage of brown trout: Countergradient selection or thermal sensitivity? Evol. Ecol. 2006, 20, 345–363.
  86. Millidine, K.J.; Armstrong, J.D.; Metcalfe, N.B. Juvenile salmon with high standard metabolic rates have higher energy costs but can process meals faster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2009, 276, 2103–2108.
  87. Norin, T.; Clark, T.D. Fish face a trade-off between ‘eating big’ for growth efficiency and ‘eating small’ to retain aerobic capacity. Biol. Lett. 2017, 13, 20170298.
  88. Jonsson, B.; Jonsson, N. Ecology of Atlantic Salmon and Brown Trout: Habitat as a Template for Life Histories; Fish & Fisheries Series 33; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011.
  89. Brett, J.R. Some principles in the thermal requirements of fishes. Q. Rev. Biol. 1956, 31, 75–87.
  90. Elliott, J.M. The energetics of feeding, metabolism, and growth of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in relation to body weight, water temperature and ration size. J. Anim. Ecol. 1976, 45, 923–948.
  91. Elliott, J.M.; Hurley, M.A. Daily energy intake and growth of piscivorous brown trout, Salmo trutta. Freshw. Biol. 2000, 44, 237–245.
  92. Rodnick, K.J.; Gamperl, A.K.; Lizars, K.R.; Bennett, M.T.; Rausch, R.N.; Keele, E.R. Thermal tolerane and metabolic physiology among redband trout population in south-eastern Oregon. J. Fish Biol. 2004, 64, 310–335.
  93. Verhille, C.E.; English, K.K.; Cocherell, D.E.; Farrell, A.P.; Fangue, N.A. High thermal tolerance of a rainbow trout population near its southern range limit suggests local thermal adjustment. Cons. Physiol. 2016, 4, cow057.
  94. Debes, P.V.; Solberg, M.F.; Matre, I.H.; Dyrhovden, L.; Glover, K.A. Genetic variation for upper thermal tolerance diminishes within and between populations with increasing acclimation temperature in Atlantic salmon. Heredity 2021, 127, 455–466.
  95. Morita, K.; Fukuwaka, M.; Tanimata, N.; Yamamura, O. Size-dependent thermal preferences in a pelagic fish. Oikos 2010, 119, 1265–1272.
  96. Haraldstad, Ø.; Jonsson, B. Age and sex segregation in habitat utilization by brown trout in a Norwegian lake. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1983, 112, 27–37.
  97. Lindmark, M.; Ohlberger, J.; Gårdmark, A. Optimum growth temperature declines with body size within fish species. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2022, 28, 2259–2271.
  98. Archer, L.C.; Hutton, S.A.; Harman, L.; Poole, R.W.; Gargan, P.; McGinnity, P.; Reed, T.E. Associations between metabolic traits and growth rate in brown trout (Salmo trutta) depend on thermal regime. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2021, 288, 20211509.
  99. Finstad, A.G.; Jonsson, B. Effect of incubations temperature on growth performance in Atlantic salmon. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2012, 454, 75–82.
  100. Jonsson, B.; Jonsson, N.; Finstad, A.G. Linking embryonic temperature with adult reproductive investment. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2014, 515, 217–226.
  101. Burgerhout, E.; Mommens, M.; Johansen, H.; Aunsmo, A.; Santi, N.; Andersen, Ø. Genetic background and embryonic temperature affect DNA methylation and expression of myogenin and muscle development in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e179918.
  102. Flewelling, S.; Parker, S.L. Effects of temperature and oxygen on growth and differentiation of embryos of the ground skink, Scincella lateralis. J. Exp. Zool. A 2015, 323, 445–455.
  103. José-Edwards, D.S.; Oda-Ishii, I.; Nibu, Y.; Di Gregorio, A. Tbx2/3 is an essential mediator within the Brachyury gene network during Ciona notochord development. Development 2013, 140, 2422–2433.
  104. Dorrity, M.W.; Saunders, L.M.; Duran, M.; Srivatsan, S.R.; Ewing, B.; Queitsch, C.; Shendure, J.; Raible, D.W.; Kimelman, D.; Trapnell, C. Proteostasis governs differential temperature sensitivity across embryonic cell types. bioRxiv 2022.
  105. Jonsson, N.; Hansen, L.P.; Jonsson, B. Variation in age, size and repeat spawning of adult Atlantic salmon in relation to river discharge. J. Anim. Ecol. 1991, 60, 937–947.
  106. Jonsson, B.; Jonsson, N. Sexual size dimorphism in anadromous brown trout Salmo trutta. J. Fish Biol. 2015, 87, 187–193.
  107. Atkinson, D. Temperature and organism size—A biological law for ectotherms? Adv. Ecol. Res. 1994, 25, 1–58.
  108. Alm, G. Connection between maturity, size and age in fishes. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 1959, 40, 5–145.
  109. Jonsson, B.; Finstad, A.G.; Jonsson, N. Winter temperature and food quality affect age and size at maturity in ectotherms: An experimental test with Atlantic salmon. Can. J Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2012, 69, 1817–1826.
  110. Jonsson, B.; Jonsson, N.; Finstad, A.G. Effects of temperature and food quality on age at maturity of ectotherms: An experimental test of Atlantic salmon. J. Anim. Ecol. 2013, 82, 201–210.
  111. Jonsson, B.; Jonsson, N.; Albretsen, J. Environmental change influences the life history of salmon in the North Atlantic. J. Fish Biol. 2016, 88, 618–637.
  112. Vollset, K.W.; Urdal, K.; Utne, K.; Thorstad, E.B.; Sægrov, H.; Raunsgard, A.; Skagseth, Ø.; Lennox, R.J.; Østborg, G.M.; Ugedal, O.; et al. Ecological regime shift in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean revealed from the unprecedented reduction in marine growth of Atlantic salmon. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabk2542.
  113. Bigler, B.S.; Welch, D.W.; Helle, J.H. A review of size trends among North Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2011, 53, 455–465.
  114. Oke, K.B.; Cunningham, C.J.; Westley, P.A.H.; Baskett, M.L.; Carlson, S.M.; Clark, J.; Hendry, A.P.; Karatayev, V.A.; Kendall, N.W.; Kibele, J.; et al. Recent declines in salmon body size impact ecosystems and fisheries. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4155.
  115. Naiman, R.J.; Bilby, R.E.; Schindler, D.E.; Helfield, J.M. Pacific salmon, nutrients, and the dynamics of freshwater and riparian ecosystems. Ecosystems 2002, 5, 399–417.
  116. Walsh, J.C.; Pendray, J.E.; Godwin, S.C.; Artelle, K.A.; Kindsvater, H.K.; Field, R.D.; Harding, J.N.; Swain, N.R.; Reynolds, J.D. Relationships between Pacific salmon and aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems: Implications for ecosystem-based management. Ecology 2020, 101, e03060.
  117. Ferguson, A.; Prodöhl, P.A. Identifying and conserving sympatric diversity in trout of the genus Salmo, with particular reference to Lough Melvin, Ireland. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 2022, 31, 177–207.
  118. Levin, B.; Simonov, E.; Gabrielyan, B.K.; Mayden, R.L.; Rastorguev, S.M.; Roubenyan, H.R.; Sharko, F.S.; Nedoluzhko, A.V. Caucasian treasure: Genomics sheds light on the evolution of half-extinct Sevan trout, Salmo ischchan, species flock. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2022, 167, 107346.
  119. Jonsson, B.; Hindar, K. Reproductive strategy of dwarf and normal Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) from Vangsvatnet Lake, western Norway. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1982, 39, 1404–1413.
  120. Bernatchez, L.; Renaut, S.; Whiteley, A.R.; Derome, N.; Jeukens, J.; Landry, L.; Lu, G.; Nolte, A.W.; Østbye, K.; Rogers, S.M.; et al. On the origin of species: Insights from the ecological genomics of lake whitefish. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2010, 365, 1783–1800.
  121. Hindar, K.; Jonsson, B. Habitat and food segregation of dwarf and normal Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) from Vangsvatnet Lake, western Norway. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1982, 39, 1030–1045.
  122. Hindar, K.; Jonsson, B. Ecological polymorphism in Arctic charr. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1993, 8, 63–74.
  123. Snorrason, S.S.; Skulason, S.; Jonsson, B.; Malmqvist, H.; Jonasson, P.M.; Sandlund, O.T.; Lindem, T. Trophic specialization in Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus (Pisces: Salmonidae): Morphological divergence and ontogenetic shifts. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1994, 52, 1–18.
  124. Rougeux, C.; Bernatchez, L.; Gagnaire, P.-A. Modeling the multiple facets of speciation-with-gene-flow toward inferring the divergence history of lake whitefish species pairs (Coregonus clupeaformis). Gen. Biol. Evol. 2017, 9, 2057–2074.
  125. Steinbacher, P.; Wanzenböck, J.; Brandauer, M.; Holper, R.; Landertshammer, J.; Mayr, M.; Platzl, C.; Stoiber, W. Thermal experience during embryogenesis contributes to the induction of dwarfism in whitefish Coregonus lavaretus. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185384.
  126. Scott, G.R.; Johnston, I.A. Temperature during embryonic development has persistent effects on thermal acclimation capacity in zebrafish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 14247–14252.
  127. Morita, K.; Tamate, T.; Kuroki, M.; Nagasawa, T. Temperature-dependent variation in alternative migratory tactics and its implications for fitness and population dynamics in a salmonid fish. J. Anim. Ecol. 2014, 83, 1268–1278.
  128. Morán, P.; Pérez-Figueroa, A. Methylation changes associated with early maturation stages in the Atlantic salmon. BMC Gen. 2011, 12, 86.
  129. Pankhurst, N.W.; King, H. Temperature and salmonid reproduction: Implications for aquaculture. J. Fish Biol. 2010, 76, 69–85.
  130. Debes, P.V.; Piavchenko, N.; Ruokolainen, A.; Ovaskainen, O.; Moustakas-Verho, J.E.; Parre, N.; Aykanat, T.; Erkinaro, J.; Primmer, C.R. Large single-locus effects for maturation timing are mediated via body condition in Atlantic salmon. bioRxiv 2019.
  131. Fjelldal, P.G.; Hansen, T.; Huang, T.-S. Continuous light and elevated temperature can trigger maturation both during and immediately after smoltification in male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 2011, 321, 93–100.
  132. Baum, D.; Armstrong, J.D.; Metcalfe, N.B. The effect of temperature on growth and early maturation in a wild population of Atlantic salmon parr. J. Fish Biol. 2005, 67, 1370–1380.
  133. Jonsson, N.; Jonsson, B. Trade-off between egg size and numbers in brown trout. J. Fish Biol. 1999, 55, 767–783.
  134. Braun, D.C.; Patterson, D.A.; Reynolds, J.D. Maternal and environmental influences on egg size and juvenile life-history traits in Pacific salmon. Ecol. Evol. 2013, 3, 1727–1740.
  135. Takatsu, K.; Brodersen, J. Repeated elevational clines of early life-history traits and their proximate mechanisms in brown trout. Freshw. Biol. 2023, 68, 609–620.
  136. Einum, S.; Hendry, A.P.; Fleming, I.A. Egg-size evolution in aquatic environments: Does oxygen availability constrain size? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 269, 2325–2330.
  137. Fleming, I.A.; Gross, M.R. Latitudinal clines: A trade-off between egg number and size in Pacific salmon. Ecology 1990, 71, 1–11.
  138. Beacham, T.D.; Murray, C.B. Fecundity and egg size variation in North American Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus). J. Fish Biol. 1993, 42, 485–508.
  139. Jonsson, B.; Jonsson, N. Early environments affect later performances in fishes. J. Fish Biol. 2014, 85, 155–188.
  140. Jonsson, B.; Jonsson, N. Trans-generational maternal effect: Temperature influences egg size of the offspring in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. J. Fish Biol. 2016, 89, 1482–1489.
  141. Venney, C.J.; Wellband, K.W.; Houle, C.; Garant, D.; Audet, C.; Bernatchez, L. Thermal regime during parental sexual maturation, but not during offspring rearing, modulates DNA methylation in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2022, 289, 20220670.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Ecology
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Bror Jonsson
View Times: 326
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 30 Jun 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback