Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Celia Andreu-Sanchez
 -- 1553 2023-06-27 11:49:42 |
2 Update references
Sirius Huang
 Meta information modification 1553 2023-06-28 10:33:51 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Martín-Pascual, M.�.; Andreu-Sánchez, C. Mesh Opportunistic Networks. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46107 (accessed on 26 July 2024).
Martín-Pascual M�, Andreu-Sánchez C. Mesh Opportunistic Networks. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46107. Accessed July 26, 2024.
Martín-Pascual, Miguel Ángel, Celia Andreu-Sánchez. "Mesh Opportunistic Networks" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46107 (accessed July 26, 2024).
Martín-Pascual, M.�., & Andreu-Sánchez, C. (2023, June 27). Mesh Opportunistic Networks. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/46107
Martín-Pascual, Miguel Ángel and Celia Andreu-Sánchez. "Mesh Opportunistic Networks." Encyclopedia. Web. 27 June, 2023.
Mesh Opportunistic Networks
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/asi6030060

Opportunistic networks allow for communication between nearby mobile devices through a radio connection, avoiding the need for cellular data coverage or a Wi-Fi connection. The limited spatial range of this type of communication can be overcome by using nodes in a mesh network. 

opportunistic networks OppNet mesh communication mobile communication

1. Introduction

As a hyperconnected society, there are occasions when communication networks fail and data access is impossible through conventional means, highlighting the strategic importance of alternative electronic communication methods. Natural disasters cause the collapse of communication towers and Internet services [1][2]; very crowded areas, such as concerts or sports events, affect users’ communications; and areas with few inhabitants need expensive investment for regular communication. It has become clear that social networks have become useful to cover disasters and emergencies [3][4] and connect people. However, in many circumstances, it is very possible that we will be left without access to these networks, the Internet and even, possibly, mobile telephone communications, limiting their utility.

2. Opportunistic Networks or OppNets

Opportunistic networks or OppNets, and specifically local mesh networks, have been seen to be very useful in emergency situations [5]. The term OppNets was coined by Leszek Lilien in 2005, thinking of mobile seed networks that can expand locally and be deployed, for example, for communications after an earthquake [6][7]. An opportunistic mesh network allows for direct communication between mobile devices that are within reach, which can be called nodes, even if there is no cellular or Wi-Fi coverage. The OppNet mesh network uses intermediate nodes to send messages from their sender (or source) to their receiver in an opportunistic way [8]. To do this, low-energy connections can be used to establish personal wireless networks that connect mobiles and their data screens to portable mesh radio devices, for example, using Bluetooth protocols. These networks were originally conceived and designed for emergency situations where no alternative stable telephone communication is available. However, the concept transcends its use for emergencies, and facilitates the use of a free public radio spectra for social, interpersonal, and community communications outside of data networks, Wi-Fi networks or other means to access the Internet [9]. The mesh network can grow and be strengthened by adding new nodes, represented by mobile users and their OppNet devices, and is likely one day to become integrated into the mobile device itself. Obviously, no manufacturer or operator is currently interested in offering inexpensive equipment that bypasses data tariffs and the control of large portals, permitting private communications independent of the data giants and with no need to pay an operator fee.
In a typical mesh OppNet scenario, the individual uses their mobile device (without network connection) as a screen, linked to an OppNet radio device that sends the desired information and that simultaneously acts as a node to receive information from others (see Figure 1). Thus, mesh OppNets are networks in which the nodes may be individual users, vehicles, fixed devices, etc. [10]. The more users in the mesh OppNet, the more nodes, and the more nodes, the greater the scope for communication and coverage. This means that the coverage provided by mesh OppNets varies in time and space depending on the density and mobility of the users with devices.
Figure 1. Typical OppNet communication protocol with common devices in a mesh network: (A) One-to-one and direct communication; and (B) one-to-one communication using a third-part node to increase the distance covered by the system. Note that the intermediate node is unaware that it is being used for the communication process.
As a society, we now assume that mobile media can be characterized not by its technological convergence but rather, by its network organization [11]. However, this network articulation tends to refer to the content and its distribution. By contrast, mesh OppNet communication between people and small communities can also occur according to this model of network organization. Accordingly, mobile media, communication studies, and electronic commerce must consider these emerging technologies, in parallel to the extension of smartphones, which will have important consequences for community and social communications, and in territorial management [12].

3. The Coverage and Scope of the Mesh OppNets

As mentioned above, the coverage of these networks depends on the nodes that exist. Each device not only serves as a sender and receiver of its own communication but is also a node for the transmission of external communications. Considering that the range of these devices is usually a radius of around 4000 m, knowing how many users are around will give us information about the potential coverage we can obtain from our network. Thus, mesh OppNets represent a mode of communication with a scope that is dictated by the number and location of the other users (or nodes). For example, when the distribution of perhaps the most widely implanted device is studied, the goTenna Mesh™ device, a disparity in implantation can be observed over the geographic area of interest with consequent differences in potential coverage. In areas such as California, Florida or New York, the coverage of this device is extensive due to its high density, whereas in areas such as northern and southern Europe, the absence of nodes (or repeating goTenna devices) makes widespread territorial coverage impossible. In the coming years, we are likely to witness an emergence of these small devices, as they are currently being developed by numerous start-ups. At present, there are a few similar commercial devices registered, such as Garmin inReach, SPOT X Satellite Messenger, Beartooth (the most similar to goTenna Mesh), Fogo or Sonnet, but they still do not have the diffusion of goTenna Mesh. Sonnet is a little delayed in its development and was not commercialized in 2023, despite being announced for 2019. All these mesh OppNet devices are priced between $45 and $300, depending on their GPS characteristics, whether they have a screen or use of the mobile phone’s screen, and their autonomy or coverage [13]. It should be remembered that at least two devices are required to establish a mesh network and indeed, they are commonly sold in pairs. In these cases, the mesh network is meaningless if there are no devices to create it.

4. Privacy and Security in Mesh OppNets

The privacy and security of personal messages are among the most important things that interest users, companies, and public administrations today. We know that, through automated processes that use more or less biased algorithms, our connected society accumulates digital dossiers of people online [14]. The problem with this is not simply the loss of control over personal information, the existence of “proto big brother” controllers, or omniscient corporations or portals but rather, the problem is the bureaucratic processing of uncontrolled data that affects our lives [15], constituting an authentic digital tattoo [16][17][18]. In this sense, mesh OppNets involve interactions among multiple decentralized nodes [19], not in terms of a social network but rather, through mesh networks that establish opportunistic connections that can occupy the urban space. These communication networks do not require formal leadership, or a command post or control center, nor do they require a vertical organization responsible for distributing information or instructions. Rather, these systems advocate networking as a way of life [19]. In this context, this type of network offers new options in terms of the privacy and security regulations of personal communications.
Although there does not currently seem to be an appropriate approach to these situations, it is understood that regulating mesh OppNets should take place within the framework of the unstoppable phenomenon of convergence between the information and communications technologies [20]. Such approaches must align with the new discipline of computer law, which assumes the right to computer freedom as a personal modality recognized by citizens, legally protecting the “computer identity” of each individual [21]. Alternatively, mesh network proposals are emerging, such as payment gateways for Bitcoins using Blockchain or other cryptocurrency transactions, employing protocols with decentralized networks [22]. Without a need for the Internet, these mesh OppNets protocols mask the physical situation of the sender or receiver, and they avoid telephone identification as they do not use a SIM card or IP address [23][24].

5. OppNets and Broadcasters

To date, too little attention has been paid to ad hoc electronic communications and opportunistic networks (or OppNets) in professional settings, outside of security services [25]. Broadcast work in crowded environments, saturated with terminals, a lot of noise, at large events or in places with a complicated orography, places important demands on efficient electronic communications. During the coverage of large events, such as demonstrations, events in stadiums, circuits, outdoor sports, concerts, fairs, etc., coordinating intercommunications is decisive. Recently, this problem has been aggravated by live mobile journalism (MoJo) broadcasts through dedicated Wi-Fi and data networks, especially when connected multi-camera or mobile streaming techniques are employed [26]. For audiovisual retransmissions of such events, it is best to free up the network as much as possible and not to use the entire data bandwidth, directing or sending data to servers for team communications or coordination. In addition, these are often very noisy environments that reach saturation due to the high density of people connected or the difficulties in obtaining a connection that allows for broadcast-quality streaming. Indeed, it is possible that communication is impeded by the inhibition of telephone frequencies due to passive security issues, and/or the presence of authorities [27]. Hence, an electronic communication system through mesh OppNets is presented here as a commercial and professional communications alternative in the field of broadcasting, in particular for mass events such as those described above.

References

  1. Kwasinski, A. Effects of Hurricanes Isaac and Sandy on Data and Communications Power Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the Intelec 2013 35th International Telecommunications Energy Conference, Smat Power and Efficiency, Hamburg, Germany, 13–17 October 2013; pp. 1–6.
  2. Federal Communications Commission. Communications Status Report for Areas Impacted by Hurricane Dorian; Federal Communications Commission: Washington, DC, USA, 2019.
  3. Mayo-Cubero, M. Uso de las redes sociales en la cobertura periodística de crisis, desastres y emergencias en España. Rev. Esp. Comun. Salud 2019, (Suppl. 1), 43–54.
  4. Stephens, K.K.; Robertson, B.W.; Murthy, D. Throw me a lifeline: Articulating mobile social network dispersion and the social construction of risk in rescue communication. Mob. Media Commun. 2020, 8, 149–169.
  5. Ferranti, L.; Oro, S.D.; Bonati, L.; Demirors, E.; Cuomo, F.; Melodia, T. HIRO-NET: Self-Organized Robotic Mesh Networking for Internet Sharing in Disaster Scenarios. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 20th International Symposium on “A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks” (WoWMoM), Washington, DC, USA, 10–12 June 2019.
  6. Lilien, L.; Kamal, Z.H.; Bhuse, V.; Gupta, A. The concept of opportunistic networks and their research challenges in privacy and security. In Mobile and Wireless Network Security and Privacy; Makki, S.K., Teiher, P., Makki, K., Pissinou, N., Makki, S., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2007; pp. 85–117.
  7. Lilien, L.; Gupta, A.; Yang, Z. Opportunistic networks for emergency applications and their standard implementation framework. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, 11–13 April 2007.
  8. Borrego, C.; Borrell, J.; Robles, S. Efficient broadcast in opportunistic networks using optimal stopping theory. Ad Hoc Netw. 2019, 88, 5–17.
  9. Borrego, C.; Borrell, J.; Robles, S. Hey, influencer! Message delivery to social central nodes in social opportunistic networks. Comput. Commun. 2019, 137, 81–91.
  10. Cuka, M.; Elmazi, D.; Bylykbashi, K.; Matsuo, K.; Ikeda, M.; Barolli, L. A Fuzzy-Based System for Selection of IoT Devices in Opportunistic Networks Considering Number of Past Encounters. In Advances on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing; Xhafa, F., Leu, F.-Y., Ficco, M., Yang, C.-T., Eds.; Springer Nature AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 223–237.
  11. Cardoso, G. Los Medios de Comunicación en la Sociedad en Red. Filtros, Escaparates y Noticias; UOC Ediciones: Barcelona, Spain, 2008.
  12. Frith, J.; Özkul, D. Mobile media beyond mobile phones. Mob. Media Commun. 2019, 7, 293–302.
  13. TripSavvy. Available online: https://www.tripsavvy.com/gadgets-for-backcountry-communication-4066040 (accessed on 16 March 2022).
  14. Fundación Telefónica. Identidad Digital: El Nuevo Usuario en el Mundo Digital; Fundación Telefónica: Barcelona, Spain, 2013.
  15. Solove, D.J. The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age; New York University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  16. Enriquez, J. As the Future Catches You: How Genomics and Other Forces Are Changing Your Life, Work, Health, and Wealth; Random House Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  17. Enriquez, J. Your Online Life, Permanent as a Tattoo. Ted Talk 2013. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu1C-oBdsMM (accessed on 16 March 2022).
  18. Setyowati, L. Digital Life, Digital Tattoo and the Filter Bubble: Raising the awareness and the cautions on online activities through information literacy education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Science Mapping and the Development of Science, Gadjah Mada University, Yogya, Indonesia, 20–21 April 2016.
  19. Castells, M. Redes de Indignación y Esperanza; Alianza Editorial: Madrid, Spain, 2012.
  20. Díaz Revorio, F.J. Los Derechos Humanos ante Los Nuevos Avances Científicos y Tecnológicos. Genética e Internet ante la Constitución; Tirant Lo Blanch: Valencia, Spain, 2009.
  21. Pérez Luño, A.E. Nuevas Tecnologías y Derechos Humanos; Tirant Lo Blanch: Valencia, Spain, 2014.
  22. In the Mesh. Available online: https://inthemesh.com/archive/the-eye-of-sauron-problem/ (accessed on 16 March 2022).
  23. Lightning Network. Available online: https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2022).
  24. Global Mesh Labs. Available online: https://acortar.link/7ek1HQ (accessed on 16 March 2022).
  25. Arora, S.; Barton, J.; Judd, B.; Wang, D. Peer-3-Peer: Disaster Proof Offline Messaging; Integration Lab at University of Pennsylvania: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 1–9.
  26. Martín-Pascual, M.Á.; Andreu-Sánchez, C. La eclosión de la técnica ubicua. In #MOJO: Manual de Periodismo Móvil; Pérez Tornero, J.M., Martín-Pascual, M.Á., Eds.; Instituto RTVE: Madrid, Spain, 2017; pp. 63–92.
  27. Garcia Garcia, L. Diseño y Análisis de un Sistema de Inhibición de Frecuencia Portátil en un Entorno Inalámbrico Interior. Ph.D. Thesis, Public University of Navarra, Navarra, Spain, 2014.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Communication
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Miguel Ángel Martín-Pascual
,
Celia Andreu-Sánchez
View Times: 346
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 28 Jun 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback