Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Maria-Angela Losi
 -- 1968 2023-06-19 17:39:36 |
2 format correction
Dean Liu
 Meta information modification 1968 2023-06-20 04:22:21 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Borrelli, F.; Losi, M.A.; Canciello, G.; Todde, G.; Perillo, E.F.; Ordine, L.; Frisso, G.; Esposito, G.; Lombardi, R. Sarcomeric versus Non-Sarcomeric HCM. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/45806 (accessed on 22 December 2024).
Borrelli F, Losi MA, Canciello G, Todde G, Perillo EF, Ordine L, et al. Sarcomeric versus Non-Sarcomeric HCM. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/45806. Accessed December 22, 2024.
Borrelli, Felice, Maria Angela Losi, Grazia Canciello, Gaetano Todde, Errico Federico Perillo, Leopoldo Ordine, Giulia Frisso, Giovanni Esposito, Raffaella Lombardi. "Sarcomeric versus Non-Sarcomeric HCM" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/45806 (accessed December 22, 2024).
Borrelli, F., Losi, M.A., Canciello, G., Todde, G., Perillo, E.F., Ordine, L., Frisso, G., Esposito, G., & Lombardi, R. (2023, June 19). Sarcomeric versus Non-Sarcomeric HCM. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/45806
Borrelli, Felice, et al. "Sarcomeric versus Non-Sarcomeric HCM." Encyclopedia. Web. 19 June, 2023.
Sarcomeric versus Non-Sarcomeric HCM
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/cardiogenetics13020009

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common heritable cardiovascular disorder and is characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), which is unexplained by abnormal loading conditions. HCM is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait and, in about 40% of patients, the causal mutation is identified in genes encoding sarcomere proteins.

hypertrophic cardiomyopathy sarcomeres genetic screening

1. Introduction

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic heart disease, with a prevalence of 1 in 500 individuals; it is characterized by asymmetric left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, which is not explained by an overload caused by other cardiac or systemic diseases [1][2][3]. HCM has been the focus of intense clinical and basic science investigation for decades, since the discovery of the first mutation in the Myosin Heavy Chain-7 (MYH7) gene, encoding β-cardiac myosin heavy chain (β-MHC), in 1989 [4]. Research studies conducted over the last 30 years have provided significant insights into the genetic and pathogenic basis and clinical course of HCM. Mutations in genes encoding sarcomere proteins have been identified as the main cause of HCM and the molecular mechanisms of the disease have been largely elucidated, with the consequent improvement of clinical management and the discovery of novel therapies [5]. However, despite the progress that has been made in genetic screening, the causal mutation remains unidentified in up to 60% of HCM patients [1][6].
The pathophysiologic characteristics of HCM are unexplained LV hypertrophy (LVH), left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, a high risk of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD), and dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO); the latter may occur in more than 50% of the patients [7]. HCM patients often present with highly variable phenotypic expressions in terms of the degree and distribution of LVH and its clinical course. It is common to observe patients who share the same gene mutation and belong to the same family to develop a variable phenotype ranging from almost asymptomatic forma to severe arrhythmias or the evolution of heart failure. The phenotypic variability can be related to genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. It has been shown that the HCM phenotype may be influenced by modifier gene(s), altering the effect of causal genes [8]. Furthermore, polymorphic variants in several genes may regulate wall thickness and prognosis in HCM, as shown by recent genome-wide association studies that have identified significant susceptibility loci for HCM [9] and suggest that common variants may explain some of the variable expressivity of the pathogenic sarcomere variants [10][11].
A diverse array of symptoms may occur in HCM patients, ranging from exertional dyspnea, fatigue, palpitations, lightheadedness, syncope, and atypical chest pain, to SCD [12][13]. Although a significant proportion of HCM patients remain asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic throughout life, SCD may occur in about 2% of patients as the first symptom of the disease; moreover, in about 8% of HCM patients, the disease may evolve towards heart failure with wall thinning, cavity enlargement, and systolic dysfunction [13]. Remarkably, signs and symptoms do not necessarily correlate with the degree of LVH or with the severity of LVOTO [14]. The poor correlation between the severity of symptoms and physio-pathological abnormalities and phenotypic variability might impair accurate and early diagnoses and be responsible for inappropriate therapy choices.
Determining the relationship between the genotype, phenotype, and outcomes over a lifetime is critical to improving risk stratification and to guiding patient clinical management.

2. Definitions of Sarcomeric and Non-Sarcomeric HCM

According to the results of genetic screening, HCM patients are currently categorized in two broad, relatively distinct populations: (1) the sarcomere-mutation-positive (Sarc+) group, including carriers of a sarcomere genetic mutation, which comprises about 40% of HCM patients, and (2) the sarcomere-mutation-negative (Sarc−) population, including HCM patients in whom the causal mutation has not been identified [15] (Figure 1A). In rare cases, a pathogenic variant in a non-sarcomeric gene may be identified in patients with a typical HCM phenotype: the prognosis and the clinical management of these rare cases may be assisted by the observation of the clinical course in family members and published case reports. The establishment of international registries is needed to better define the outcome and the SCD risk in this subpopulation of Sarc− HCM.
Cardiogenetics 13 00009 g001 550
Figure 1. (A): Percentages of Sarc+ and Sarc− HCM and of phenocopies; the latter are listed in Panel (B). (C): sarcomeric genes associated with Sarc+ HCM with the relative percentages of affected individuals. The image also shows the coded pro-teins and their localization in the sarcomere. Abbreviation as in the text.

3. Differential Diagnosis with Phenocopies

Phenocopies (conditions mimicking the HCM phenotype, accounting for approximately 3–5% of unexplained LVH; Figure 1B) must be excluded from the Sarc− HCM sub-population [16]. These conditions include lysosomal storage disorders (e.g., Fabry disease), cardiac amyloidosis, glycogen storage disorders (e.g., Danon disease), protein kinase adenosine monophosphate-activated non-catalytic subunit gamma 2 (PRKAG2) cardiomyopathy, RASopathies (including Noonan syndrome, LEOPARD syndrome, Costello syndrome, and cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome), mitochondrial diseases, and several inborn metabolic disorders [17].
Despite being relatively less common, it is important to differentiate HCM phenocopies from both Sarc+ and Sarc− HCM because their management and prognosis differ significantly [18]. A deep understanding of the specific features of all the diseases that may cause an HCM phenotype is essential to recognizing a specific etiology [19]. Reaching a fast and definite diagnosis is crucial for the correct risk stratification of the proband and the early initiation of disease-modifying therapy (when available); moreover, the identification of the genetic causes of the disease allows for the screening of family members and the identification of additional carriers who may benefit from specific treatments [20].
The inheritance pattern and age at presentation might provide guidance for the differential diagnosis of sine causa LVH cases [19]. While rare Sarc− HCM may present as X-linked or autosomal recessive diseases, HCM typically exhibits an autosomal dominant transmission. Hence, an X-linked transmission might rather suggest a diagnosis of Anderson–Fabry or Danon disease, especially if additional signs and symptoms typical of these diseases are present, namely, acroparesthesia, gastrointestinal symptoms [21], kidney dysfunction, angiokeratomas, and anhidrosis in Fabry disease [22]; and early age of onset, muscle weakness, intellectual disability, and cardiac conduction abnormalities in Danon disease [23]. Since Sarc+ HCM is not usually associated with systemic manifestations, their presence should arouse suspicious of a different etiology. Other examples of systemic involvement are muscle weakness in mitochondrial diseases, peripheral nervous system involvement, and carpal tunnel syndrome in amyloidosis, gait disturbances in Friedreich’s ataxia, facial dysmorphism in RASopathies, and so on.
The identification of LVH in a neonate or an infant with a matrilinear inheritance is highly suggestive of a metabolic or a mitochondrial disease [19]. On the other hand, the identification of LVH in an elderly patient represents a red flag for amyloidosis, particularly when associated with a discrepancy between the EKG voltages and the degree of LVH in the echocardiogram [24].
In addition to the clinical presentation and type of inheritance, EKG abnormalities might provide important diagnostic hints: for example, in patients with massive LVH in echocardiograms, high EKG voltages associated with pre-excitation are characteristic of Danon disease [19]. Other disease-specific EKG findings are short PQ intervals in Anderson–Fabry disease and atrio-ventricular blocks in cardiac amyloidosis or storage diseases [19].
In addition to the clinical observations and EKGs, conventional and advanced imaging plays a central role in the diagnostic workup of unexplained LVH cases and often shows early abnormalities and disease-specific signs, which may lead clinicians toward the correct diagnosis. This topic is discussed in more detail in paragraph 7.

4. Genetics of Sarc+ and Sarc− HCM

HCM has classically been recognized as a disease of the sarcomere (Figure 1C) [25]. Indeed, the most frequent genetic causes of HCM are mutations in genes encoding thick filament proteins, namely, myosin heavy chain-7 (MYH7) encoding for cardiac beta-myosin heavy chain (β-MHC), cardiac myosin binding protein C (MYBPC3), Myosin Light Chains 2 and 3 (MYL2 and MYL3), and myosin heavy chain 6 (MYH6) encoding cardiac alpha-myosin heavy chain (α-MHC), with the first two accounting for more than 70% of Sarc+ cases [26]. The genes encoding thin filament components, including cardiac α-actin 1 (ACTC1) and the troponin/tropomyosin complex formed by cardiac troponin C (TNNC1), cardiac troponin I (TNNI3), cardiac troponin T (TNNT2), and tropomyosin 1 (TPM1), are associated with less than 5% of Sarc+ HCM cases [16] (Figure 1C). Furthermore, mutations in genes coding for proteins with either structural or enzymatic functions located in other structures of the sarcomere, such as the Z disc proteins Alpha-actinin-2 (ACTN2) and Myozenin-2 (MYOZ2) [27] or the M line proteins Muscle RING Finger (MuRF1), Obscurin (OBSCN) and Myomesin 2 (MYOM2), can occasionally be detected as genetic causes of Sarc+ HCM [26].
In some cases, the disease may be caused by the occurrence of more than one genetic variant: the presence of double heterozygous, compound heterozygous, and homozygous mutations is often associated with more severe disease [25]. After the introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS), an increased number of genetic variants were detected in both sarcomere and non-sarcomere genes, allowing for the early identification of genetically affected family members and preventing the unnecessary follow-up of non-carriers. However, the NGS-based approaches have also increased the yield of variants of unknown significance (VUS), the clinical interpretation of which remains challenging [28].
According to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), a genetic variant can be considered pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) if at least one of the following criteria is met [29]
  • the genetic variant co-segregates with the HCM phenotype in the family and is absent in the phenotype-negative individuals;
  • the genetic variant has prior evidence of pathogenicity, which means it has been documented as a disease-causing mutation in ≥1 patient in the published literature;
  • the genetic variant is absent in the healthy population;
  • the genetic variant is predicted (in silico or by functional studies) to cause major disruptions of the structure and function of the encoded protein.
In HCM, the causal mutation is often private (which means it is described only in one family) or is detected in small family pedigrees or may be a de novo variant identifiable only in the proband; moreover, HCM typically shows incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity of the phenotype, which may be due to the influence of environmental and genetic modifiers [29]. For these reasons, in many cases, the ACMG criteria cannot be used to establish the pathogenicity of genetic variants identified in HCM probands [29].
To identify the missing causal genes in Sarc− HCM, it is probably necessary to shift from a deterministic approach, which assumes that HCM is caused by a single mutation with a large effect, to a probabilistic approach, which considers HCM a polygenic disease in which multiple genetic variants with moderate effect sizes collectively contribute to the development of the phenotype (Figure 2A). Epigenetics, genetic variants with modifier effects, and responses to environmental factors are also expected to affect the expression of the phenotype (Figure 2B) [30].
Cardiogenetics 13 00009 g002 550
Figure 2. (A): Rare variants with large effect sizes are more common in familial monogenic HCM, while those with moder-ate effect sizes and higher population frequencies are often found in the sporadic cases and in small families with oligo-genic HCM. On the other side are the common genetic variants with small size effects which in combination may pre-dispose to LVH in the presence of an overload. (B): HCM phenotypic expression is the result of the interplay of the caus-al variants with epigenetics, genetic modifiers and environmental factors (for example obesity, and hypertension).

5. HCM Caused by Mutations in Non-Sarcomeric Genes

Advances in DNA-sequencing technologies and the introduction of NGS cardiomyopathy gene panels in clinical practice allow for the rapid analysis of many genes at affordable costs, providing the opportunity to identify the missing P/LP variants in many Sarc− HCM patients [30]. Therefore, although mutations in sarcomeric genes remain the most common causes of HCM, variants in several additional genes encoding non-sarcomeric proteins have been associated with the disease in a small number of HCM patients [31]. At the present time, the genes showing strong evidence of an association with HCM are: cysteine and glycine-rich protein 3 (CSRP3) [32][33], four and half LIM domains 1 (FHL1) [34][35], filamin C (FLNC) [36][37][38], formin homology 2 domain-containing 3 (FHOD3) [39][40], junctophilin 2 (JPH2) [41], phospholamban (PLN) [42][43], Tripartite Motif-Containing 63 (TRIM63) [44][45], and Kelch-like protein 24 (KLHL24) [46].

References

  1. Maron, B.J.; Desai, M.Y.; Nishimura, R.A.; Spirito, P.; Rakowski, H.; Towbin, J.A.; Rowin, E.J.; Maron, M.S.; Sherrid, M.V. Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2022, 79, 372–389.
  2. Elliott, P.M.; Anastasakis, A.; Borger, M.A.; Borggrefe, M.; Cecchi, F.; Charron, P.; Hagege, A.A.; Lafont, A.; Limongelli, G.; Mahrholdt, H.; et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J. 2014, 35, 2733–2779.
  3. Semsarian, C.; Ingles, J.; Maron, M.S.; Maron, B.J. New Perspectives on the Prevalence of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015, 65, 1249–1254.
  4. Geisterfer-Lowrance, A.A.T.; Kass, S.; Tanigawa, G.; Vosberg, H.-P.; McKenna, W.; Seidman, C.E.; Seidman, J.G. A Molecular Basis for Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A β Cardiac Myosin Heavy Chain Gene Missense Mutation. Cell 1990, 62, 999–1006.
  5. Seidman, C.E.; Seidman, J.G. Identifying Sarcomere Gene Mutations in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circ. Res. 2011, 108, 743–750.
  6. Moody, W.E.; Elliott, P.M. Changing Concepts in Heart Muscle Disease: The Evolving Understanding of Hypertrophic Car-diomyopathy. Heart 2022, 108, 768–773.
  7. Maron, M.S.; Olivotto, I.; Zenovich, A.G.; Link, M.S.; Pandian, N.G.; Kuvin, J.T.; Nistri, S.; Cecchi, F.; Udelson, J.E.; Maron, B.J. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Is Predominantly a Disease of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction. Circulation 2006, 114, 2232–2239.
  8. Daw, E.W.; Chen, S.N.; Czernuszewicz, G.; Lombardi, R.; Lu, Y.; Ma, J.; Roberts, R.; Shete, S.; Marian, A.J. Genome-Wide Mapping of Modifier Chromosomal Loci for Human Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007, 16, 2463–2471.
  9. Kumar, A.; Rani, B.; Sharma, R.; Kaur, G.; Prasad, R.; Bahl, A.; Khullar, M. ACE2, CALM3 and TNNI3K Polymorphisms as Potential Disease Modifiers in Hypertrophic and Dilated Cardiomyopathies. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2018, 438, 167–174.
  10. Harper, A.R.; Goel, A.; Grace, C.; Thomson, K.L.; Petersen, S.E.; Xu, X.; Waring, A.; Ormondroyd, E.; Kramer, C.M.; Ho, C.Y.; et al. Common Genetic Variants and Modifiable Risk Factors Underpin Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Susceptibility and Ex-pressivity. Nat. Genet. 2021, 53, 135–142.
  11. Tadros, R.; Francis, C.; Xu, X.; Vermeer, A.M.C.; Harper, A.R.; Huurman, R.; Kelu Bisabu, K.; Walsh, R.; Hoorntje, E.T.; te Rijdt, W.P.; et al. Shared Genetic Pathways Contribute to Risk of Hypertrophic and Dilated Cardiomyopathies with Opposite Di-rections of Effect. Nat. Genet. 2021, 53, 128–134.
  12. Marian, A.J.; Braunwald, E. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circ. Res. 2017, 121, 749–770.
  13. Maron, B.J.; Rowin, E.J.; Udelson, J.E.; Maron, M.S. Clinical Spectrum and Management of Heart Failure in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. JACC Heart Fail. 2018, 6, 353–363.
  14. Ommen, S.R.; Mital, S.; Burke, M.A.; Day, S.M.; Deswal, A.; Elliott, P.; Evanovich, L.L.; Hung, J.; Joglar, J.A.; Kantor, P.; et al. 2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 76, e159–e240.
  15. Neubauer, S.; Kolm, P.; Ho, C.Y.; Kwong, R.Y.; Desai, M.Y.; Dolman, S.F.; Appelbaum, E.; Desvigne-Nickens, P.; DiMarco, J.P.; Friedrich, M.G.; et al. Distinct Subgroups in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the NHLBI HCM Registry. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 74, 2333–2345.
  16. Alfares, A.A.; Kelly, M.A.; McDermott, G.; Funke, B.H.; Lebo, M.S.; Baxter, S.B.; Shen, J.; McLaughlin, H.M.; Clark, E.H.; Babb, L.J.; et al. Results of Clinical Genetic Testing of 2,912 Probands with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Expanded Panels Offer Limited Additional Sensitivity. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 880–888.
  17. Pieroni, M.; Ciabatti, M.; Saletti, E.; Tavanti, V.; Santangeli, P.; Martinese, L.; Liistro, F.; Olivotto, I.; Bolognese, L. Beyond Sarcomeric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: How to Diagnose and Manage Phenocopies. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2022, 24, 1567–1585.
  18. Gersh, B.J.; Maron, B.J.; Bonow, R.O.; Dearani, J.A.; Fifer, M.A.; Link, M.S.; Naidu, S.S.; Nishimura, R.A.; Ommen, S.R.; Rakowski, H.; et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 58, e212–e260.
  19. Rapezzi, C.; Arbustini, E.; Caforio, A.L.P.; Charron, P.; Gimeno-Blanes, J.; Helio, T.; Linhart, A.; Mogensen, J.; Pinto, Y.; Ristic, A.; et al. Diagnostic Work-up in Cardiomyopathies: Bridging the Gap between Clinical Phenotypes and Final Diagnosis. A Position Statement from the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 1448–1458.
  20. Losi, M.A.; Nistri, S.; Galderisi, M.; Betocchi, S.; Cecchi, F.; Olivotto, I.; Agricola, E.; Ballo, P.; Buralli, S.; D’Andrea, A.; et al. Echo-cardiography in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Usefulness of old and new techniques in the diagnosis and pathophysiological assessment. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2010, 17, 7.
  21. Hoffmann, B.; Beck, M.; Sunder-Plassmann, G.; Borsini, W.; Ricci, R.; Mehta, A. Nature and Prevalence of Pain in Fabry Disease and Its Response to Enzyme Replacement Therapy—A Retrospective Analysis From the Fabry Outcome Survey. Clin. J. Pain 2007, 23, 535–542.
  22. Karen, J.K.; Hale, E.K.; Ma, L. Angiokeratoma Corporis Diffusum (Fabry Disease). Dermatol. Online J. 2005, 11, 8.
  23. Cenacchi, G.; Papa, V.; Pegoraro, V.; Marozzo, R.; Fanin, M.; Angelini, C. Review: Danon Disease: Review of Natural History and Recent Advances. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2020, 46, 303–322.
  24. Cipriani, A.; de Michieli, L.; Porcari, A.; Licchelli, L.; Sinigiani, G.; Tini, G.; Zampieri, M.; Sessarego, E.; Argirò, A.; Fumagalli, C.; et al. Low QRS Voltages in Cardiac Amyloidosis. JACC CardioOncol. 2022, 4, 458–470.
  25. Melas, M.; Beltsios, E.T.; Adamou, A.; Koumarelas, K.; McBride, K.L. Molecular Diagnosis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM): In the Heart of Cardiac Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 12, 225.
  26. Marian, A.J. Molecular Genetic Basis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circ. Res. 2021, 128, 1533–1553.
  27. Osio, A.; Tan, L.; Chen, S.N.; Lombardi, R.; Nagueh, S.F.; Shete, S.; Roberts, R.; Willerson, J.T.; Marian, A.J. Myozenin 2 Is a Novel Gene for Human Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 766–768.
  28. Mazzaccara, C.; Lombardi, R.; Mirra, B.; Barretta, F.; Esposito, M.V.; Uomo, F.; Caiazza, M.; Monda, E.; Losi, M.A.; Limongelli, G.; et al. Next-Generation Sequencing Gene Panels in Inheritable Cardiomyopathies and Channelopathies: Prevalence of Pathogenic Variants and Variants of Unknown Significance in Uncommon Genes. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1417.
  29. Hershberger, R.E.; Givertz, M.M.; Ho, C.Y.; Judge, D.P.; Kantor, P.F.; McBride, K.L.; Morales, A.; Taylor, M.R.G.; Vatta, M.; Ware, S.M. Genetic Evaluation of Cardiomyopathy: A Clinical Practice Resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet. Med. 2018, 20, 899–909.
  30. Ingles, J.; Goldstein, J.; Thaxton, C.; Caleshu, C.; Corty, E.W.; Crowley, S.B.; Dougherty, K.; Harrison, S.M.; McGlaughon, J.; Milko, L.v.; et al. Evaluating the Clinical Validity of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Genes. Circ. Genom. Precis Med. 2019, 12, e002460.
  31. Walsh, R.; Buchan, R.; Wilk, A.; John, S.; Felkin, L.E.; Thomson, K.L.; Chiaw, T.H.; Loong, C.C.W.; Pua, C.J.; Raphael, C.; et al. Defining the Genetic Architecture of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Re-Evaluating the Role of Non-Sarcomeric Genes. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 3461–3468.
  32. Lipari, M.; Wypasek, E.; Karpinski, M.; Tomkiewicz-Pajak, L.; Laino, L.; Binni, F.; Giannarelli, D.; Rubis, P.; Petkow-Dimitrow, P.; Undas, A.; et al. Identification of a Variant Hotspot in MYBPC3 and of a Novel CSRP3 Autosomal Recessive Alteration in a Cohort of Polish Cases Affected by Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Pol. Arch. Intern. Med. 2020, 130, 89–99.
  33. Janin, A.; Bessière, F.; Chauveau, S.; Chevalier, P.; Millat, G. First Identification of Homozygous Truncating CSRP3 Variants in Two Unrelated Cases with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Gene 2018, 676, 110–116.
  34. Gallego-Delgado, M.; Gonzalez-Lopez, E.; Garcia-Guereta, L.; Ortega-Molina, M.; Gonzalez-Vioque, E.; Cobo-Marcos, M.; Alonso-Pulpon, L.; Garcia-Pavia, P. Adverse Clinical Course and Poor Prognosis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Due to Mutations in FHL1. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 191, 194–197.
  35. Friedrich, F.W.; Wilding, B.R.; Reischmann, S.; Crocini, C.; Lang, P.; Charron, P.; Müller, O.J.; McGrath, M.J.; Vollert, I.; Hansen, A.; et al. Evidence for FHL1 as a Novel Disease Gene for Isolated Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012, 21, 3237–3254.
  36. Cui, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C.; Wu, G.; Zhu, C.; Tang, B.; Zou, Y.; Huang, X.; Hui, R.; Song, L.; et al. Mutation Profile of FLNC Gene and Its Prognostic Relevance in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Mol. Genet. Genomic. Med. 2018, 6, 1104–1113.
  37. Gómez, J.; Lorca, R.; Reguero, J.R.; Morís, C.; Martín, M.; Tranche, S.; Alonso, B.; Iglesias, S.; Alvarez, V.; Díaz-Molina, B.; et al. Screening of the Filamin C Gene in a Large Cohort of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2017, 10, e001584.
  38. Verdonschot, J.A.J.; Vanhoutte, E.K.; Claes, G.R.F.; Helderman-van den Enden, A.T.J.M.; Hoeijmakers, J.G.J.; Hellebrekers, D.M.E.I.; Haan, A.; Christiaans, I.; Lekanne Deprez, R.H.; Boen, H.M.; et al. A Mutation Update for the FLNC Gene in Myo-pathies and Cardiomyopathies. Hum. Mutat. 2020, 41, 1091–1111.
  39. Ochoa, J.P.; Lopes, L.R.; Perez-Barbeito, M.; Cazón-Varela, L.; Torre-Carpente, M.M.; Sonicheva-Paterson, N.; de Uña-Iglesias, D.; Quinn, E.; Kuzmina-Krutetskaya, S.; Garrote, J.A.; et al. Deletions of Specific Exons of FHOD3 Detected by Next-generation Sequencing Are Associated with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Clin. Genet. 2020, 98, 86–90.
  40. Ochoa, J.P.; Sabater-Molina, M.; García-Pinilla, J.M.; Mogensen, J.; Restrepo-Córdoba, A.; Palomino-Doza, J.; Villacorta, E.; Martinez-Moreno, M.; Ramos-Maqueda, J.; Zorio, E.; et al. Formin Homology 2 Domain Containing 3 (FHOD3) Is a Genetic Basis for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 72, 2457–2467.
  41. Vanninen, S.U.M.; Leivo, K.; Seppälä, E.H.; Aalto-Setälä, K.; Pitkänen, O.; Suursalmi, P.; Annala, A.-P.; Anttila, I.; Alastalo, T.-P.; Myllykangas, S.; et al. Heterozygous Junctophilin-2 (JPH2) p.(Thr161Lys) Is a Monogenic Cause for HCM with Heart Failure. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203422.
  42. Parisi, V.; Chiti, C.; Graziosi, M.; Pasquale, F.; Ditaranto, R.; Minnucci, M.; Biffi, M.; Potena, L.; Girolami, F.; Baldovini, C.; et al. Phospholamban Cardiomyopathy: Unveiling a Distinct Phenotype Through Heart Failure Stages Progression. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2022, 15, e014232.
  43. Medin, M.; Hermida-Prieto, M.; Monserrat, L.; Laredo, R.; Rodriguez-Rey, J.C.; Fernandez, X.; Castro-Beiras, A. Mutational Screening of Phospholamban Gene in Hypertrophic and Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Functional Study of the PLN -42 C>G Mutation. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2007, 9, 37–43.
  44. Chen, S.N.; Czernuszewicz, G.; Tan, Y.; Lombardi, R.; Jin, J.; Willerson, J.T.; Marian, A.J. Human Molecular Genetic and Functional Studies Identify TRIM63, Encoding Muscle RING Finger Protein 1, as a Novel Gene for Human Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circ. Res. 2012, 111, 907–919.
  45. Salazar-Mendiguchía, J.; Ochoa, J.P.; Palomino-Doza, J.; Domínguez, F.; Díez-López, C.; Akhtar, M.; Ramiro-León, S.; Cle-mente, M.M.; Pérez-Cejas, A.; Robledo, M.; et al. Mutations in TRIM63 Cause an Autosomal-Recessive Form of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Heart 2020, 106, 1342–1348.
  46. Hedberg-Oldfors, C.; Abramsson, A.; Osborn, D.P.S.; Danielsson, O.; Fazlinezhad, A.; Nilipour, Y.; Hübbert, L.; Nennesmo, I.; Visuttijai, K.; Bharj, J.; et al. Cardiomyopathy with Lethal Arrhythmias Associated with Inactivation of KLHL24. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019, 28, 1919–1929.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Felice Borrelli
,
Maria Angela Losi
,
Grazia Canciello
,
Gaetano Todde
,
Errico Federico Perillo
,
Leopoldo Ordine
,
Giulia Frisso
,
Giovanni Esposito
,
Raffaella Lombardi
View Times: 443
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 20 Jun 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback