Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Consolato Schiavone
 -- 2365 2023-06-16 10:41:21 |
2 format correct
Conner Chen
Meta information modification 2365 2023-06-19 03:07:57 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Schiavone, C.; Portesi, C. Contamination of Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances in Environment and Food. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/45708 (accessed on 27 July 2024).
Schiavone C, Portesi C. Contamination of Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances in Environment and Food. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/45708. Accessed July 27, 2024.
Schiavone, Consolato, Chiara Portesi. "Contamination of Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances in Environment and Food" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/45708 (accessed July 27, 2024).
Schiavone, C., & Portesi, C. (2023, June 16). Contamination of Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances in Environment and Food. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/45708
Schiavone, Consolato and Chiara Portesi. "Contamination of Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances in Environment and Food." Encyclopedia. Web. 16 June, 2023.
Contamination of Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances in Environment and Food
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/app13116696

More than 7000 synthetic compounds known as per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are applied to food packaging and other materials to provide fat, fire, and/or water resistance properties. These compounds have exceptional environmental stability and persistence due to the strong C-F chemical bond, earning them the moniker “forever chemicals”. Emission of PFAS from industrial waste leads to water, air, and soil contamination. 

PFAS food safety Environment POPs

1. Contamination in Environment and Food

Due to the risks posed to human health by the exposure to PFASs, reliable data about the level of contamination of the environment and food matrices are required and several studies are already available [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. An updated overview is given in this section and then summarized in Table 1 (environmental matrices) and Table 2 (food and FCMs).
Table 1. Summary of relevant data from the literature for contamination of PFAS in environment.
Source GenX or Novel PFAS Sum of PFAS
WWTPs EU, New Zealand EU, New Zealand, US
Groundwater
(freshwaters)		 EU, US, China EU, US, China, Canada, and India
Crude oil China China
Wild animals EU EU
Table 2. Summary of relevant data from the literature for contamination of PFAS in food and from FCMs.
Source GenX or Novel PFAS Sum of PFAS
Drinking water US, Korea EU, US, China, Korea
Blood serum N.A. * EU, US, China, Canada
Breast milk China EU, US, China, Canada
Fish EU EU, US, China, Vietnam
Eggs N.A. * EU
* N.A. = not available.

2. Environmental Contamination

In order to estimate the risk posed by PFAS to human health, it is important to monitor the possible source to which humans can be exposed. In this respect, wastewater is known to play a significant role and several studies [8][9] have studied the level of contamination of sludge from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Europe. In particular, Fredriksson et al. [10] detected novel perfluoroalkyl sulfonamide-based (FASA) copolymers in WWTPs in Sweden. The study demonstrated that these copolymers come from both domestic and industrial sources. In New Zealand, Lenka et al. [11] detected, in addition to 20 PFASs, ultrashort-chain perfluoropropionic acid (PFPrA) in urban waters, coming from two urban WWTPs.
A step forward is understanding the contribution of groundwaters. Several studies carried out in Europe and US addressed this point and showed high levels of contamination. In particular, 12 out of 29 PFASs were found in Sweden [12] and 14 out of 24 in the Eastern United States [13]. Given the large number of PFAS documented in commercial use and the environment, the PFASs examined here might not reflect the entire PFAS inventory in groundwater.
Also, crude oil, according to EPA [14], needs to be tested due to its presence in the interface between soil and groundwater. Yao et al. [15] proved that crude oil may be a significant source of PFAS contamination in the environment because they are applied in oil exploitation activity. PFCAs (27%) and p-perfluorousnonenoxybenzene sulphonate (OBS) (31%) made up the majority of the crude oil sample, while PFSAs (16%), ether-substituted polyfluoroalkyl (linear) sulphonic acids (OPFLSAs) (10%), 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonamidoalkyl betaine (6:2 FTAB) (7%) and hydrogen-substituted polyfluoroalkyl (linear) carboxylic acids (HPFLCAs) (5%) made the rest of the samples. Their findings showed that certain new PFASs appeared in crude oil as a result of the use of chemical oil additives during the oil drilling process.
Ng et al. [16] focused their study on rivers, another important possible source of contamination, looking for the occurrence of PFAS in the Danube River Basin. The researchers used both target and suspect screening (non-targeted) approaches that allowed them to detect a total of 82 PFAS, 72 of which were detected only by suspect screening. PFOS was the only compound found in all of the water and biota matrices studied. Five PFAS were detected only in influent wastewater samples and not in effluent wastewater samples, indicating that they were successfully removed during wastewater treatment.
Another approach for assessing contamination coming from the terrestrial environment is to use wild animals as indicators to monitor PFAS. Moretti et al. [17] determined legacy and emerging poly- and per-fluoropolyethers in 28 wild boars using an HPLC-HRMS method. Boars were chosen because they are already confirmed to be suitable models to monitor PFAS contamination in the terrestrial environment [18][19]. The boars come from Italy and the analysis was carried out by sampling the boars’ livers. The chloropolyfluoropolyeters carboxylates and their related dechlorinated congeners, HPFPECAs, were discovered for the first time in pooled liver from Italian wild boars. These PFASs might be used as an indicator for terrestrial food chains. This preliminary data shows that the panel of PFAS with toxicological significance should be expanded.

3. Contamination of Food and from Food Contact Materials

Global concern is spreading fast due to the high levels of PFAS detected in blood serum [20][21][22][23]. The FDA’s Total Diet Study was one of the first studies monitoring PFAS in food in the United States. Genualdi et al. [24] found out that three out of 167 samples were detected positive, but no foods had concentrations of PFAS above 150 ng/kg.
In this paragraph, an updated overview of the scientific research around PFAS contamination in relevant food and food related matrices is reported.
In the last decades many studies addressed the level of PFAS in drinking water [25][26][27].
Liu et al. [28] collected data on a total of 18 PFASs in 526 samples of drinking water from 66 Chinese cities. Cities that produce PTFE have significantly greater levels of PFOA in their drinking water than cities that do not (with significance explained by a p < 0.05). The study showed that most Chinese cities have PFAS levels in drinking water that are higher than strict international guidelines and higher than Chinese health advisories.
Domingo et al. [29] collected 30 samples at different stages of drinking water treatment in Catalonia and found relevant concentration of PFOS and PFOA.
Scher et al. [30] analyzed the occurrence of PFAS in garden produce at homes to discover if soils with a history of contaminated drinking water could determine contamination for fruits and vegetables. The detection of PFBA and, with lower occurrence, PFPeA demonstrated the uptake of short-chained PFASs from soil to plants and confirmed that PFBA and PFPeA had the highest “foliage to root concentration factor” (defined as the concentration in foliage/concentration in the root). It was also established that PFBA concentrations strongly depended on the type of vegetable and on the water loading.
Babayev et al. [31] aimed to understand the levels of PFAS in drinking water and blood serum for people in the southeast Alaska community. This pilot research confirmed that water samples nearby airport operations and fire training sites are strongly contaminated and found a positive correlation between PFAS concentrations in serum and well water. The most prevalent substances were PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFHxA.
Gloria B. Post [32] published a mini-review on the Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) about the PFAS levels in breast milk in the US and Canada populations. The researcher confirmed that it will be necessary to take preventive actions to protect breastfeeding mothers from exposure to PFAS in order to reduce their quantities in breast milk in the general population. Han et al. [33] looked for 30 PFAS in 100 pooled human breast milk samples during the 2017–2020 National Human Milk Survey to characterize the exposure risks of legacy and emerging PFAS in perinatal women and their children in China. The findings showed that L-PFOA, L-PFOS, and 6:2 Cl-PFESA were the three most common PFAS found in Chinese human milk.
Giari et al. [34] studied PFAS levels in fish species providing a significant information on the level of contamination of fish in the Po River, Italy. Prevalently were detected PFOS, PFDA and PFUnDA, while GenX and C6O4 were not detected. For the first time this study focused on the PFAS partitioning in a parasite-fish system obtaining that the infection state did not significantly alter the accumulation of PFAS in fish.
More than 500 samples of fish filets were characterized by Barbo et al. [35] in the US from 2013 to 2015 as part of the US EPA’s monitoring programs. The study demonstrated that almost all fish in American rivers, streams, and the Great Lakes were contaminated by significant levels of PFAS, primarily PFOS, whereas seafood purchased at grocery stores has significantly lower levels of PFAS. Other studies, such as Kumar et al. [36], made progress in detecting PFAS contamination by looking for fluorinated compounds in fish samples in the Baltic Sea and Finnish lakes, and PFOS was found in all the 1134 fishes analyzed, and also long-chain PFCAs were frequently detected. The monitoring of PFOS levels over the last decades do not show any decrease, so this demonstrates that no effective actions have been taken. In the Czech Republic, Semerád et al. [37] confirmed contamination in freshwater fishes. In particular, long-chain PFASs were detected at a relevant concentration, with short-chain PFASs and GenX measured at relatively low levels. A study focused on fish filet samples [38] showed that from 2014 and 2019 a decrease of PFAS occurred, while PFOS increased. Hoa et al. [39] deepened the study on fish by investigating distribution of PFAS contamination in the different tissues. The fish blood samples were found to be contaminated by 17 PFAS, with concentrations from 5.2 ng/mL to 29 ng/mL. In addition, the concentrations were substantially higher in liver samples than in muscle samples. In general, the study demonstrated that PFAS have unique distribution profiles depending on the species, tissue, and location. Rüdel et al. [40] derived a filet-to-whole fish conversion factor to assess potential risks posed by the consumption of fish filet.
PFAS contamination in eggs has been studied as well due to their greasy nature [41][42]. Miller et al. [43] investigating temporal trends of PFAS in eggs of different species. Among all PFAS, PFOS was found to be present in the highest concentration, even if with a decreasing trend over time probably due their industrial phase out in the last decades. On the contrary, long chain PFAS such as perfluorotridecanoic acid (PFTrDA) and perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUdA) were found to increase. These results were confirmed by Glória Pereira et al. [44], during a monitoring over 35 years in eggs of the northern gannet in UK.
Investigations by Granby et al. [45] of the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) National Food Institute unequivocally show that the PFAS entered the eggs through fish meal in the chicken diet. Hence, substituting a non-contaminated feed component might substantially lower the amount of PFAS in the eggs within a few weeks.
Androulakakis et al. [46] studied freshwater and terrestrial top predators from Northern Europe. The majority of apex predators (AP) and their prey were found to be contaminated, and, in particular the three perfluoroalkylphosphinic acids were detected in all the samples. The study demonstrated a strong correlation between the geographic origin of the specimens and the quantities of PFAS in AP, with samples taken from urban and agricultural regions being significantly more polluted than those taken from pristine or semi-pristine places.
The migration of PFAS from Food Contact Materials (FCMs) is considered to be a relevant source of contamination. According to Galbiati et al. [47], some substances in the group of PFASs used in the FCM production have been classified as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), therefore it is important to investigate their possible migration into foods. Lerch et al. [48] conducted migration tests on paper FCMs treated with PFAS for understanding their behavior at high temperature applications, and it was found that PFAS migration to real foods contributes significantly to tolerable weekly intake. Minet et al. [49] studied the use and release of PFASs in FCMs in Canada and the US and showed that FCM containing minimal concentration of PFAS can nonetheless contaminate the entire waste stream. In Canada, Schwartz-Narbonne et al. [50] tested fast food packaging for PFAS contamination by comparing compostable bowls to single-use plastic bowls. Despite the fact that compostable bowls are promoted as “green” alternatives to plastic bowls, they have been positively tested for PFAS contamination sources and therefore appear to be a regrettable alternative to single-use bowls.
Testing food simulants and leakage of non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) by FCMs is not the only way to estimate the level of contamination of PFAS related to food packaging migration. It is also important to investigate the exposure of consumers [51][52][53][54][55]. Susmann et al. [56], for example, studied the dietary habits of the US population, monitoring the exposure to PFASs also through food packaging. The results showed that popcorn consumption is associated with significantly higher levels of PFOA, PFNA, PFDA, and PFOS in serum. This correlation was not detected in other types of foods, e.g., pizza. That outcome could be accounted for as an effect of the migration from microwave popcorn packaging.
The fact that PFAS can contaminate humans is demonstrated by studies addressing the measurement of PFAS levels in blood serum. The work of Richterová et al. [57] was the first research to use standardized, consistent, and quality-controlled PFAS exposure data from Europe. This research was carried out as a European Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU) aligned study. A total of 1957 children and teenagers from Sweden, Norway, Slovakia, Spain, Slovenia, Greece, France, Germany, and Belgium were tested. Almost all subjects tested positive for PFOS, PFOA, PFNA, and PFHxS. Teenagers in the North and West of Europe have much higher PFAS values than those in the South and East. The eating of fish and shellfish was linked to greater PFAS concentrations, while consuming eggs was linked to increased concentrations of PFOS and PFNA. These findings offer details on possible PFAS exposure sources for focused PFAS in food monitoring.
Monitoring PFAS in food and environment is critical to understanding and managing potential health and environmental impacts. Accurate and reliable measurements of levels of PFAS in our soils, water, and foods will ensure the development of effective action in preventing and/or mitigating the possible risk related to PFAS.
According to recent studies, several food matrices, including those intended for infants and children, have been found to be positive to PFAS contamination at levels that are strongly dependent on the geographical area (e.g., proximity to industrial areas). In addition, it is concerning to see how high PFAS levels are in food contact materials. We need to take steps to reduce our exposure by using materials that are free from this contaminant. The health risks associated with the long-term consumption of PFAS are still not fully understood, so it is important to take proactive steps to reduce our exposure whenever possible, as phasing out PFAS from production of FCM.

References

  1. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/environmental-workplace-health/reports-publications/environmental-contaminants/human-biomonitoring-resources/per-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-canadians.html (accessed on 25 May 2023).
  2. Boone, J.S.; Vigo, C.; Boone, T.; Byrne, C.; Ferrario, J.; Benson, R.; Donohue, J.; Simmons, J.E.; Kolpin, D.W.; Furlong, E.T.; et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in source and treated drinking waters of the United States. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 653, 359–369.
  3. Schaefer, C.E.; Hooper, J.L.; Strom, L.E.; Abusallout, I.; Dickenson, E.R.V.; Thompson, K.A.; Mohan, G.R.; Drennan, D.; Wu, K.; Guelfo, J.L. Occurrence of quantifiable and semi-quantifiable poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances in united states wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2023, 233, 119724.
  4. Wang, S.; Cai, Y.; Ma, L.; Lin, X.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, X. Perfluoroalkyl substances in water, sediment, and fish from a subtropical river of China: Environmental behaviors and potential risk. Chemosphere 2022, 288, 132513.
  5. Park, H.; Choo, G.; Kim, H.; Oh, J.E. Evaluation of the current contamination status of PFASs and OPFRs in South Korean tap water associated with its origin. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 634, 1505–1512.
  6. Wang, R.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Chen, C.E.; Zhang, D.; Tang, J. Emerging and legacy per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the rivers of a typical industrialized province of China: Spatiotemporal variations, mass discharges and ecological risks. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 11.
  7. Lalonde, B.; Garron, C. Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in the Canadian Freshwater Environment. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2022, 82, 581–591.
  8. Semerád, J.; Hatasová, N.; Grasserová, A.; Černá, T.; Filipová, A.; Hanč, A.; Innemanová, P.; Pivokonský, M.; Cajthaml, T. Screening for 32 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) including GenX in sludges from 43 WWTPs located in the Czech Republic—Evaluation of potential accumulation in vegetables after application of biosolids. Chemosphere 2020, 261, 128018.
  9. Aro, R.; Eriksson, U.; Kärrman, A.; Chen, F.; Wang, T.; Yeung, L.W.Y. Fluorine Mass Balance Analysis of Effluent and Sludge from Nordic Countries. ACS ES&T Water 2021, 1, 2087–2096.
  10. Fredriksson, F.; Eriksson, U.; Kärrman, A.; Yeung, L.W.Y. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in sludge from wastewater treatment plants in Sweden—First findings of novel fluorinated copolymers in Europe including temporal analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 846, 157406.
  11. Lenka, S.P.; Kah, M.; Padhye, L.P. Occurrence and fate of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in urban waters of New Zealand. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 428, 128257.
  12. Mussabek, D.; Söderman, A.; Imura, T.; Persson, K.M.; Nakagawa, K.; Ahrens, L.; Berndtsson, R. PFAS in the Drinking Water Source: Analysis of the Contamination Levels, Origin and Emission Rates. Water 2023, 15, 137.
  13. McMahon, P.B.; Tokranov, A.K.; Bexfield, L.M.; Lindsey, B.D.; Johnson, T.D.; Lombard, M.A.; Watson, E. Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Groundwater Used as a Source of Drinking Water in the Eastern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 2279–2288.
  14. Available online: https://www3.epa.gov/carbon-footprint-calculator/tool/definitions/crude-oil.html#:~:text=Crude%20oil%20means%20a%20mixture,passing%20through%20surface%20separating%20facilities (accessed on 12 May 2023).
  15. Yao, Y.; Meng, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhu, L.; Sun, H. Non-target discovery of emerging PFAS homologues in Dagang Oilfield: Multimedia distribution and profiles in crude oil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 437, 129300.
  16. Ng, K.; Alygizakis, N.; Androulakakis, A.; Galani, A.; Aalizadeh, R.; Thomaidis, N.S.; Slobodnik, J. Target and suspect screening of 4777 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in river water, wastewater, groundwater and biota samples in the Danube River Basin. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 436, 129276.
  17. Moretti, S.; Barola, C.; Giusepponi, D.; Paoletti, F.; Piersanti, A.; Tcheremenskaia, O.; Brambilla, G.; Galarini, R. Target determination and suspect screening of legacy and emerging per- and poly-fluoro poly-ethers in wild boar liver, in Italy. Chemosphere 2023, 312, 137214.
  18. Arioli, F.; Ceriani, F.; Nobile, M.; Vigano’, R.; Besozzi, M.; Panseri, S.; Chiesa, L.M. Presence of organic halogenated compounds, organophosphorus insecticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in meat of different game animal species from an Italian subalpine area. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2019, 36, 1244–1252.
  19. Rupp, J.; Guckert, M.; Berger, U.; Drost, W.; Mader, A.; Nödler, K.; Nürenberg, G.; Schulze, J.; Söhlmann, R.; Reemtsma, T. Comprehensive target analysis and TOP assay of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in wild boar livers indicate contamination hot-spots in the environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 871, 162028.
  20. Pitter, G.; Da Re, F.; Canova, C.; Barbieri, G.; Jeddi, M.Z.; Daprà, F.; Manea, F.; Zolin, R.; Bettega, A.M.; Stopazzolo, G.; et al. Serum levels of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in adolescents and young adults exposed to contaminated drinking water in the Veneto region, Italy: A cross-sectional study based on a health surveillance program. Environ. Health Perspect. 2020, 128, 027007.
  21. Nilsson, S.; Smurthwaite, K.; Aylward, L.L.; Kay, M.; Toms, L.M.; King, L.; Marrington, S.; Barnes, C.; Kirk, M.D.; Mueller, J.F.; et al. Serum concentration trends and apparent half-lives of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Australian firefighters. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2022, 246, 114040.
  22. Kotlarz, N.; McCord, J.; Collier, D.; Suzanne Lea, C.; Strynar, M.; Lindstrom, A.B.; Wilkie, A.A.; Islam, J.Y.; Matney, K.; Tarte, P.; et al. Measurement of novel, drinking water-associated pfas in blood from adults and children in Wilmington, North Carolina. Environ. Health Perspect. 2020, 128, 077005.
  23. Graber, J.M.; Alexander, C.; Laumbach, R.J.; Black, K.; Strickland, P.O.; Georgopoulos, P.G.; Marshall, E.G.; Shendell, D.G.; Alderson, D.; Mi, Z.; et al. Per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) blood levels after contamination of a community water supply and comparison with 2013–2014 NHANES. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2019, 29, 172–182.
  24. Genualdi, S.; Beekman, J.; Carlos, K.; Fisher, C.M.; Young, W.; DeJager, L.; Begley, T. Analysis of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in processed foods from FDA’s Total Diet Study. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2022, 414, 1189–1199.
  25. Sharma, B.M.; Bharat, G.K.; Tayal, S.; Larssen, T.; Bečanová, J.; Karásková, P.; Whitehead, P.G.; Futter, M.N.; Butterfield, D.; Nizzetto, L. Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in river and ground/drinking water of the Ganges River basin: Emissions and implications for human exposure. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 208, 704–713.
  26. Reade, A.; Quinn, T.; Schreiber, J.S. PFAS in Drinking Water 2019: Scientific and Policy Assessment for Addressing Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Drinking Water; Natural Resources Defense Council: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 1–102.
  27. Ji, K.; Kim, S.; Kho, Y.; Sakong, J.; Paek, D.; Choi, K. Major perfluoroalkyl acid (PFAA) concentrations and influence of food consumption among the general population of Daegu, Korea. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 438, 42–48.
  28. Liu, L.; Qu, Y.; Huang, J.; Weber, R. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in Chinese drinking water: Risk assessment and geographical distribution. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2021, 33, 6.
  29. Domingo, J.L.; Ericson-Jogsten, I.; Perelló, G.; Nadal, M.; Van Bavel, B.; Kärrman, A. Human exposure to perfluorinated compounds in Catalonia, Spain: Contribution of drinking water and fish and shellfish. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 4408–4415.
  30. Scher, D.P.; Kelly, J.E.; Huset, C.A.; Barry, K.M.; Hoffbeck, R.W.; Yingling, V.L.; Messing, R.B. Occurrence of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in garden produce at homes with a history of PFAS-contaminated drinking water. Chemosphere 2018, 196, 548–555.
  31. Babayev, M.; Capozzi, S.L.; Miller, P.; McLaughlin, K.R.; Medina, S.S.; Byrne, S.; Zheng, G.; Salamova, A. PFAS in drinking water and serum of the people of a southeast Alaska community: A pilot study. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 305, 119246.
  32. Post, G.B. Invited Perspective: Current Breast Milk PFAS Levels in the United States and Canada Indicate Need for Additional Monitoring and Actions to Reduce Maternal Exposures. Environ. Health Perspect. 2022, 130, 2021–2022.
  33. Han, F.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Lyu, B.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, Y. Occurrences of legacy and emerging per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in human milk in China: Results of the third National Human Milk Survey (2017–2020). J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 443, 130163.
  34. Giari, L.; Guerranti, C.; Perra, G.; Cincinelli, A.; Gavioli, A.; Lanzoni, M.; Castaldelli, G. PFAS levels in fish species in the Po River (Italy): New generation PFAS, fish ecological traits and parasitism in the foreground. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 876, 162828.
  35. Barbo, N.; Stoiber, T.; Naidenko, O.V.; Andrews, D.Q. Locally caught freshwater fish across the United States are likely a significant source of exposure to PFOS and other perfluorinated compounds. Environ. Res. 2023, 220, 115165.
  36. Kumar, E.; Koponen, J.; Rantakokko, P.; Airaksinen, R.; Ruokojärvi, P.; Kiviranta, H.; Vuorinen, P.J.; Myllylä, T.; Keinänen, M.; Raitaniemi, J.; et al. Distribution of perfluoroalkyl acids in fish species from the Baltic Sea and freshwaters in Finland. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132688.
  37. Semerád, J.; Horká, P.; Filipová, A.; Kukla, J.; Holubová, K.; Musilová, Z.; Jandová, K.; Frouz, J.; Cajthaml, T. The driving factors of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substance (PFAS) accumulation in selected fish species: The influence of position in river continuum, fish feed composition, and pollutant properties. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 816, 151662.
  38. Stahl, L.L.; Snyder, B.D.; McCarty, H.B.; Kincaid, T.M.; Olsen, A.R.; Cohen, T.R.; Healey, J.C. Contaminants in fish from U.S. rivers: Probability-based national assessments. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 861, 160557.
  39. Hoa, N.T.Q.; Lieu, T.T.; Anh, H.Q.; Huong, N.T.A.; Nghia, N.T.; Chuc, N.T.; Quang, P.D.; Vi, P.T.; Tuyen, L.H. Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in freshwater fish from urban lakes in Hanoi, Vietnam: Concentrations, tissue distribution, and implication for risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 52057–52069.
  40. Rüdel, H.; Radermacher, G.; Fliedner, A.; Lohmann, N.; Koschorreck, J.; Duffek, A. Tissue concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in German freshwater fish: Derivation of fillet-to-whole fish conversion factors and assessment of potential risks. Chemosphere 2022, 292, 133483.
  41. Van der Schyff, V.; Kwet Yive, N.S.C.; Polder, A.; Cole, N.C.; Bouwman, H. Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in tern eggs from St. Brandon’s Atoll, Indian Ocean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 154, 111061.
  42. Mikolajczyk, S.; Pajurek, M.; Warenik-Bany, M. Perfluoroalkyl substances in hen eggs from different types of husbandry. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 134950.
  43. Miller, A.; Elliott, J.E.; Elliott, K.H.; Lee, S.; Cyr, F. Temporal trends of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in eggs of coastal and offshore birds: Increasing PFAS levels associated with offshore bird species breeding on the Pacific coast of Canada and wintering near Asia. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2015, 34, 1799–1808.
  44. Pereira, M.G.; Lacorte, S.; Walker, L.A.; Shore, R.F. Contrasting long term temporal trends in perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in eggs of the northern gannet (Morus bassanus) from two UK colonies. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 141900.
  45. Available online: https://www.food.dtu.dk/english/news/pfas-found-in-organic-eggs-in-denmark?id=789f9ba1-bdfc-4a7d-908b-fc6cccff4742 (accessed on 12 May 2023).
  46. Androulakakis, A.; Alygizakis, N.; Gkotsis, G.; Nika, M.C.; Nikolopoulou, V.; Bizani, E.; Chadwick, E.; Cincinelli, A.; Claßen, D.; Danielsson, S.; et al. Determination of 56 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in top predators and their prey from Northern Europe by LC-MS/MS. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 131775.
  47. Galbiati, E.; Tietz, T.; Zellmer, S.; Merkel, S. Risk Assessment of Food Contact Materials II. EFSA J. 2022, 20, e200408.
  48. Lerch, M.; Nguyen, K.H.; Granby, K. Is the use of paper food contact materials treated with per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances safe for high-temperature applications?—Migration study in real food and food simulants. Food Chem. 2022, 393, 133375.
  49. Minet, L.; Wang, Z.; Shalin, A.; Bruton, T.A.; Blum, A.; Peaslee, G.F.; Schwartz-Narbonne, H.; Venier, M.; Whitehead, H.; Wu, Y.; et al. Use and release of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in consumer food packaging in U.S. and Canada. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2022, 24, 2032–2042.
  50. Schwartz-Narbonne, H.; Xia, C.; Shalin, A.; Whitehead, H.D.; Yang, D.; Peaslee, G.F.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Peng, H.; Blum, A.; et al. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Canadian Fast Food Packaging. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2023, 10, 343–349.
  51. Hu, X.C.; Dassuncao, C.; Zhang, X.; Grandjean, P.; Weihe, P.; Webster, G.M.; Nielsen, F.; Sunderland, E.M. Can profiles of poly- and Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in human serum provide information on major exposure sources? Environ. Health A Glob. Access Sci. Source 2018, 17, 11.
  52. D’Eon, J.C.; Mabury, S.A. Is indirect exposure a significant contributor to the burden of perfluorinated acids observed in humans? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 7974–7984.
  53. Boronow, K.E.; Brody, J.G.; Schaider, L.A.; Peaslee, G.F.; Havas, L.; Cohn, B.A. Serum concentrations of PFASs and exposure-related behaviors in African American and non-Hispanic white women. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2019, 29, 206–217.
  54. Tittlemier, S.A.; Pepper, K.; Seymour, C.; Moisey, J.; Bronson, R.; Cao, X.L.; Dabeka, R.W. Dietary exposure of Canadians to perfluorinated carboxylates and perfluorooctane sulfonate via consumption of meat, fish, fast foods, and food items prepared in their packaging. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3203–3210.
  55. Schaider, L.A.; Balan, S.A.; Blum, A.; Andrews, D.Q.; Strynar, M.J.; Dickinson, M.E.; Lunderberg, D.M.; Lang, J.R.; Peaslee, G.F. Fluorinated Compounds in U.S. Fast Food Packaging. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2017, 4, 105–111.
  56. Susmann, H.P.; Schaider, L.A.; Rodgers, K.M.; Rudel, R.A. Dietary habits related to food packaging and population exposure to PFASs. Environ. Health Perspect. 2019, 127, 107003.
  57. Richterová, D.; Govarts, E.; Fábelová, L.; Rausová, K.; Rodriguez Martin, L.; Gilles, L.; Remy, S.; Colles, A.; Rambaud, L.; Riou, M.; et al. PFAS levels and determinants of variability in exposure in European teenagers—Results from the HBM4EU aligned studies (2014–2021). Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2023, 247, 114057.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Environmental Sciences
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Consolato Schiavone
,
Chiara Portesi
View Times: 210
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 19 Jun 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback