Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 4223 2023-06-02 11:02:59 |
2 layout + 55 word(s) 4278 2023-06-05 04:49:00 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Wiącek, J.; Karolkiewicz, J. Ergogenic, Pre-, and Probiotic Supplementation in Sports. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 23 June 2024).
Wiącek J, Karolkiewicz J. Ergogenic, Pre-, and Probiotic Supplementation in Sports. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed June 23, 2024.
Wiącek, Jakub, Joanna Karolkiewicz. "Ergogenic, Pre-, and Probiotic Supplementation in Sports" Encyclopedia, (accessed June 23, 2024).
Wiącek, J., & Karolkiewicz, J. (2023, June 02). Ergogenic, Pre-, and Probiotic Supplementation in Sports. In Encyclopedia.
Wiącek, Jakub and Joanna Karolkiewicz. "Ergogenic, Pre-, and Probiotic Supplementation in Sports." Encyclopedia. Web. 02 June, 2023.
Ergogenic, Pre-, and Probiotic Supplementation in Sports

Exercise affects the gut microbiota and the intestinal environment. In general, a high level of physical activity is accompanied by an increase in gut microbiota diversity and health-promoting bacterial abundance (e.g., Akkermansia muciniphila and Feacalibacterium prausnitzii). Regular exercise modulates the gut microbiota, but it was found that endurance training affects the intestinal microbiota in a specific way. Resistance exercise (especially in the eccentric phase of a given exercise) and sprints (especially during downhill running) are known to cause muscle damage. 

sport supplements ergogenic gut microbiota probiotic prebiotic

1. Introduction

Of seven different bacterial phyla, two seem to dominate the colon, namely Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes (together, constituting approximately 90%) [1]. Gut microbiota modifications occur mainly through diet, physical activity and drug intake changes, whereas only 8.8% of the diversity and abundance of bacteria are shaped by genes [2]. Some dietary choices, such as low-fiber and high-fat diets, may alter the gut microbiota within 24 h [3]. The disturbed ratio of Bacteroides to Firmicutes (B:F ratio) is an example of a microbial shift in obesity.
Exercise affects the gut microbiota and the intestinal environment. In general, a high level of physical activity is accompanied by an increase in gut microbiota diversity and health-promoting bacterial abundance (e.g., Akkermansia muciniphila and Feacalibacterium prausnitzii) [4]. However, there is high heterogeneity in the responsiveness of the human gut microbiota to the current lifestyle. It has been proposed that some people may be identified as good responders, while others are called non-responders because of a lack of microbial adaptations to lifestyle changes known to promote a healthy gut [5]. There are also indications that the microbiota accounts for ca. 58% of the variation in circulating metabolite levels in humans [6], which suggests that bacteria may be involved in nutrient and bioactive compound metabolism and absorption from not only food but also dietary supplements.
There is a growing body of knowledge on the impact of different diets (HPD, high-protein diet; HCHD, high-carbohydrate diet) and pre- and probiotics on athlete gut microbiota; however, nutrient intake level is not the only driver of the differences between the sport classification groups [7]. Little is known about the potential effects of specific supplements dedicated to different sport disciplines (e.g., citrulline in “anaerobic” exercise or sodium bicarbonate in “aerobic” exercise) on microbiota composition. Creatine and caffeine are two of the most effective sport supplements; however, the actions of these compounds are universal for sport disciplines of both types. In this research, besides the pre- and probiotics for athletes, typical anaerobic- and aerobic-type exercise supplements will be described, namely protein, citrulline, arginine, and nitrates for anaerobic disciplines and carbohydrates, sodium bicarbonate, and beta-alanine for aerobic disciplines.
The modification of athletes’ microbiota for performance enhancement remains under investigation. Clinical strategies for gut disorders may be used to enhance recovery after exercise and during increased training load season. Intestinal bacteria are known to affect sleep, appetite, mood, pain and cognition [8][9][10][11][12]. There are multiway connections between the gut microbiota and the brain, as well as peripheral organs, such as the lungs, skeletal muscles, liver and skin [13][14][15][16]. Mechanisms underlying many regulatory functions of the microbiota are neuroimmonologically based, as gut bacteria that are known to promote health influence production and modulate the biological activities of immune cells and neurotransmitters [17].

2. Aerobic Exercise—Diet and Supplements

Regular exercise modulates the gut microbiota, but it was found that endurance training affects the intestinal microbiota in a specific way [18]. Long-distance running or cycling increases abdominal organ ischemia, which may have detrimental effects on the intestinal epithelium [19]. Along with local ischemia or hydration status changes, dietary recommendations for endurance athletes are an additional potentially harmful factor that could affect the gut microbiota. It is recommended that runners or cyclists consume a very high-carbohydrate diet (>45% of calories and >6 g of carbohydrates (CHO) per kg of body weight) to maintain muscular glycogen stores and sustain energy levels during long-lasting training or competition [20]. It is also recommended for athletes in these disciplines to avoid excessive fiber consumption, as it may slow down digestion and cause gastrointestinal distress during exercise. These two recommendations make the diet for endurance athletes similar to a Western diet, which is known to promote weight gain and metabolic disorders.
However, high-carbohydrate, so-called agrarian diets promote microbial biodiversity and richness. It is hypothesized that this effect is mostly mediated by fiber and resistant starch consumption. Diets based on grains, fruits, and vegetables may decrease Bacteroides abundance, while increasing probiotic strains of Bifidobacteria [21]. While cyclists, runners, or swimmers avoid excess fiber, it could be a risk factor for a healthy gut. In the previous study, researchers did not observe any significant differences in Bacteroides spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Akkermansia muciniphila, and Feacalibacterium prausnitzii abundance between amateur cyclists consuming a high-carbohydrate diet and controls with a more sedentary lifestyle consuming a diet containing more protein and fat [22]. Although the carbohydrate consumption of study participants was high (mean of 4.48 g/kg b.w. (body weight) in precompetition season vs. 5.18 g/kg b.w. in competition season; p < 0.05), it was not as high as in professional athletes (6–10 g/kg b.w.). The cyclists in the study also consumed appropriate amounts of fiber (approximately 26.8 g daily). These observations confirm the results of a study conducted by other authors who used a different method of bacterial genome sequencing and collected more samples. They found higher abundances of Bacteroides and Blautia in marathon and half-marathon runners and competitive cyclists than in controls, higher Veillonella in runners than in controls, and higher Prevotella in cyclists with a high training load than in cyclists with a low training load [23]. The same effect for Prevotella was observed in marathon runners and cross-country skiers (as compared to sedentary controls) but not for Bacteroidetes [24].
Glucose (dextrose) and maltodextrin (hydrolyzed starch) are among the most popular supplements for endurance athletes. Using CHO-based sports drinks at doses up to 90 g per training sessions (or 1.2 g/kg b.w.) enhances glycogen stores and maintains hydration and speeds up the recovery process [25]. However, high sugar consumption is known to exert negative effects on the gut mucosa and epithelium and, therefore, on the microbiota. This, in turn, may promote low-grade inflammation related to cardiovascular disease and other disorders [26]. The authors of these findings called maltodextrin “the modern stressor of the intestinal environment”. Gut dysbiosis a type 2 diabetes mediator, and high sugar intake was observed to decrease Bacteroidetes and increase Proteobacteria [27]. Drinks with glucose and/or maltodextrin, which contain 10–15% of daily carbohydrates, may significantly increase total carbohydrate intake and potentially interfere with both the gut protective barrier and the microbiota. Carbohydrate mouth rinse could be considered to maintain hydration during exercise, but it does not allow for larger doses of carbohydrates [28].
Athletes use sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) to buffer excessive hydrogen ion accumulation in muscles during exercise. Some data suggest that it enhances endurance performance, but the outcomes of meta-analyses have yielded conflicting results [29]. To date, there have been no studies on the potential impact of continuous sodium bicarbonate intake on the gut microbiota composition and metabolome of athletes. However, it was found that NaHCO3 at doses over 0.2 g/kg b.w. can acutely trigger adverse gastrointestinal symptoms [30]. These symptoms include diarrhea, which not only leads to dehydration but also microbiota disturbances. In one study, researchers assessed gut microbiota changes in patients with liver steatosis using water with standardized sodium bicarbonate, calcium, magnesium, and sulfate contents. They found a decrease in the abundance of Blautia strains and an increase in Subdoligranulum, both of which have potential probiotic properties [31]. In patients with type 2 diabetes, it was found that drinking bicarbonate-enriched water is associated with changes in metabolites related to carbohydrate breakdown and an increase in Dehalobacteriaceae bacteria strains [32]. It is unknown whether NaHCO3 has any effect on the gut microbiota of athletes.
Beta-alanine is one of the compounds that make up carnosine in the body and effectively increases its level when consumed with diet [33]. Carnosine is a peptide that is mostly stored in muscle tissues. Among its most important functions are to neutralize reactive oxygen species, reduce glycation and chelate metal ions. It also blocks the accumulation of hydrogen ions in skeletal muscles during high-intensity physical activity, which is why athletes often use it [34]. In ergogenic doses, that is, 4–6 g daily divided into 4–5 portions, beta-alanine is considered well-tolerated [35]. No human studies have considered the potential effects of beta-alanine on the gut microbiota.

3. Anaerobic Exercise—Diet and Supplements

Resistance exercise (especially in the eccentric phase of a given exercise) and sprints (especially during downhill running) are known to cause muscle damage. To recover from the most intense strength and speed training, athletes consume a high-protein diet with special focus on branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs; mainly leucine, isoleucine, and valine) from sources such as whey protein, eggs and meat, which stimulates muscle protein synthesis through the mTOR pathway.
There is a limit to the effective use of proteins, and excessive consumption of protein sources may negatively affect the gut microbiota. The generally accepted limit is set at around 1.6–2.2 g of protein per kg of b.w. divided across 4–5 meals [36], with a maximum of 0.4–0.55 g/kg b.w. (4 meals) or 0.32–0.44 g/kg b.w. (5 meals). The amount of protein that exceeds dietary recommendations may turn into toxic metabolites (e.g., ammonia and amines) through proteolytic fermentation. The gut microbiota is a key regulator of this process [37]. However, the relationship between the protein consumption level, protein sources, processing methods, physical activity type, and gut microbiota remains unclear [38]. In the recent publication, researchers compared the gut microbiota composition of amateur bodybuilders on a HPD and sedentary controls on a diet containing more fat (mean calories from protein: 33.6% vs. 22%, respectively, p < 0.05; mean calories from fat: 27.6% vs. 36.4%, respectively, p < 0.05). Researchers observed no significant differences in the colony-forming unit counts of selected intestinal bacteria (e.g., Bacteroides spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Akkermansia muciniphila, and Feacalibacterium prausnitzii) [39].
Different sources of dietary protein (animals, plants, mushrooms and yeasts) may have different impacts on the gut microbiota due to different fiber and antioxidant contents. However, protein supplements such as concentrates and isolates have most of the fat, carbohydrates, and fiber removed and are therefore easily digestible. Among athletes, whey products seem to be the most popular [40]. A systematic review of eight randomized controlled trials showed that, contrary to yogurt or kefir, whey and casein isolates (from milk) do not significantly affect the gut microbiota composition in healthy people [41]. In a randomized clinical trial, it was found that protein supplementation during caloric restriction leads to greater visceral fat mass reduction and increased microbial diversity, especially in participants with low baseline diversity, as compared to a diet without additional protein [42]. In infants (1–3 years old), whey protein hydrolysate induced an increase in the production of probiotic bacteria counts and metabolites (short-chain fatty acids; SCFAs), which suggests prebiotic functions of hydrolyzed protein [43]. However, in a pilot trial of the impact of protein supplements on athlete gut microbiota, a team of researchers found a decrease in probiotic strains of Blautia and Bifidobacterium (Bifidobacterium longum) and an increase in Bacteroidetes [44]. The authors concluded that long-term protein supplementation may have detrimental effects on the gut microbiota; however, this study was conducted on a small group (protein supplementation, n = 12; control, n = 12) of endurance rather than resistance athletes. In another randomized, double-blind trial examining the effects of multicompound products based on whey protein on sleep quality and the gut microbiota of people with sleep problems, researchers observed an increase in Bifidobacterium abundance [45]. However, it is not clear whether this effect was achieved through whey protein or galacto-oligosaccharides, which are known for prebiotic properties and were a part of the tested product. The impact of soy protein and peptides on gut microbiota seems to be more unequivocal. In a mini review based on both animal and human studies, the authors found that soy derivatives stimulate the growth of microbial diversity, especially bacteria with probiotic properties [46]. There is evidence that soy peptides stimulate Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria and simultaneously decrease Bacteroidetes, which is why athletes should consider mixing their protein sources in the diet.
Bodybuilders specifically value supplements such as citrulline and arginine because these amino acids promote vasodilation through increased nitric oxide (NO) production. This effect (so-called muscle pump) increases the transport of oxygen to working muscles. Citrulline is an amino acid derivative whose metabolism is related to the protein amino acid arginine [47]. When consumed in the diet, citrulline is broken down into arginine molecules. In turn, this amino acid is involved in the synthesis of nitric oxide in the endothelial cells of blood vessels. It delays the onset of fatigue during strength training and reduces muscle soreness on the first day after intense exercise. Another mechanism of action of citrulline or citrulline malate is the excretion of excess ammonia, which is formed during muscle activity and contributes to fatigue [48]. In addition to ammonia clearance, citrulline can improve gut homeostasis. In a double-blind, crossover study of 10 healthy men, citrulline supplementation prior to exercise attenuated splanchnic hypoperfusion, thereby protecting the mucosa from exercise-induced damage [49]. It has been proposed that this effect is mediated by increased arginine bioavailability. Citrulline and arginine participate in the urea (ornithine) cycle. Moreover, citrulline is a diagnostic tool for assessing short bowel function, as it is produced mostly in the gut [50]. While citrulline and arginine are recommended in both types of sport disciplines (aerobic and anaerobic), athletes such as bodybuilders and weightlifters tend to use much higher doses than runners and cyclists. In aerobic disciplines, athletes should consume approximately 1.5–2.0 g of arginine per day, while athletes in anaerobic disciplines may take more advantage of doses up to 10–12 g per day [51]. There is evidence that arginine, similar to glutamine, contributes to SCFA levels, thereby reducing the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes [52]. Owing to its alkalizing properties, arginine is used as a prebiotic agent in dental care [53].
Citrulline and arginine, as well as dietary nitrates, are consumed by athletes for the same reasons. While the abovementioned amino acids increase NO indirectly, dietary nitrates (for example, from beetroot and rocket) do so directly. Nitrate pathways are mediated by microbial communities in the gut and provide a respiratory substrate [54]. Nitrate supplementation is one of the most effective methods to enhance exercise performance. Nitrate reduction begins in the mouth and is induced by specific bacteria [55]. While its properties in the muscular system, gastrointestinal tract, and oral microbiota are well known, its potential impact on the gut microbiota of athletes of different sports remains unknown. In one study conducted on human fecal samples, it was found that NO may decrease health-promoting Faecalibacterium prausnitzii biomass [56]. In this experiment, researchers used an in vitro fermentation model to mimic the natural gut environment.

4. Prebiotics for Athletes

Prebiotics are a group of substances resistant to enzymes present in the human digestive tract and capable of stimulating the growth of health-promoting microorganisms. These substances improve the colonization of the host organism, which is a desirable phenomenon from the point of view of the functioning of many areas of the entire body.
Pectins (mainly from fruit) are non-digestible oligosaccharides that delay gastric emptying and lower blood glucose [57]. In a recent review, pectin fermentation was found to promote the abundance of Bacteroides and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii [58]. Owing to their antihyperglycemic and prebiotic properties, pectins should be considered a basic element of carbohydrate products for endurance athletes. Additionally, there is growing interest in the impact of sodium alginate on glycemic control. However, a meta-analysis found no ergogenic effects of drinks containing carbohydrates and sodium alginate [59]. Interestingly, in a study comparing the effects of carbohydrate drinks and pectin–alginate-enriched carbohydrate drinks on gut barrier status of athletes training in a hot–humid environment, researchers found no significant differences. Both drinks protected the intestines better than water [60].
Inulin (mainly from chicory) is another non-digestible carbohydrate that acts as a prebiotic. In a population of adults at risk of type 2 diabetes, inulin supplementation (10 g per day for 6 weeks) led to a reduction in homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance and an increase in Bifidobacteria [61]. Fructo-oligosaccharide-enriched inulin increased the abundance of Bifidobacterium uniformis in adults implementing high-intensity interval training [62]. Fructo-oligosaccharides, a group of carbohydrate derivatives similar to inulin, increase the number of Bifidobacterium species in the gut. The efficacy of doses up to 15 g/day for 4 weeks was confirmed in a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of human studies [63].
Another type of prebiotic that could be helpful for athletes is beta-glucans (i.e., from mushrooms and oats), which may promote Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria abundance and elevate the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio [64]. There are similarities in the prebiotic properties of inulin and beta-glucans [65]. Surprisingly, beta-glucan supplementation at doses of 2 g/day for 4 weeks was found to increase athletes’ grip strength [66]. Improvements in VO2max and 1 min double rocking jumps were also reported in this research. In healthy people exercising in the heat, beta-glucan (from yeast) was found to decrease inflammatory markers levels, which may preserve intestinal mucosa and microbiota in prolonged exhaustive activities [67].

5. Probiotics for Athletes

Probiotics are live microorganisms that have a mutualistic relationship with human cells when they are delivered to the gastrointestinal tract (supplements, fermented vegetables and dairy). Inhabiting the intestines, they produce protective compounds that strengthen the physical barrier between the lumen of the digestive tract and the bloodstream, as well as the microbiological barrier, by secreting compounds that inhibit other microorganisms [68]. By influencing the “lining” of the intestines, probiotic bacteria facilitate the absorption of electrolytes, controlling the state of hydration, and also improve the breakdown of proteins, fats and carbohydrates, modifying the nutritional state [69]. Much attention is also paid to the fact that bacteria produce vitamins, especially B vitamins, and enhance absorption of iron and calcium [70][71].
To date, there has been one sport-specific systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of multistrain probiotic supplementation on the exercise capacity of endurance athletes. The authors found that probiotics increased the time to exhaustion, specifically when single-strain (e.g., L. plantarum, L.casei, and B.longum) probiotics were administered at doses over 3 × 109 for less than 4 weeks [72]. Much less is known about the probiotic effects on muscle recovery in athletes with anaerobic metabolism predominance. According to a previous review, there is potential for gut microbiota modulation in the prevention of sarcopenia, but the overall data are limited [73].
The focus was on the probiotic effects on the immune systems of athletes and the number of training days missed because of respiratory tract infections. In one systematic review, a group of researchers concluded that probiotic supplementation resulted in a decrease in the risk of developing infections and symptom severity [74]. Modulation of the inflammatory cytokine profile has been proposed as the main mechanism underlying the immunomodulatory effects of probiotics in athletes [75].

6. Ergogenics and Gut Microbiota—Animal Studies

Both germ-free and rodent models with antibiotic treatments are often used to determine potential modulators of host gut microbiota. Germ-free animals are housed in a sterile environment, which allows for detection of non-environmental factors affecting intestinal bacteria [76]. In a recent experiment comparing the effects of endurance and resistance exercise on murine (C57BL6N mice) gut microbiota, endurance training was found to promote higher bacterial diversity. Four weeks of different training programs led to higher relative abundance of Desulfovibrio species in endurance exercise and Clostridium sp. (namely C. cocleatum) in resistance exercise [77]. These results support hypotheses on the different effects of different exercise characteristics on the intestinal microbiome. However, ergogenic supplements and their interactions with the gut microbiota in trained rodents were not studied extensively.
Diets with added maltodextrins induced intestinal inflammation in mice. This effect was caused by endoplasmic reticulum stress in the epithelium, with mucus depletion as a consequence [78]. Beta-alanine supplementation was not studied in the animal microbiome experiments. However, in mice receiving antibiotic treatment, researchers found a decrease in Bacteroidaceae and increase in Prevotellaceae and Rikenellaceae, along with changes in the metabolism of beta-alanine [79]. In the ischemia–reperfusion model of intestinal injury in rats, beta-alanine was found to attenuate tissue damage through decreased macrophage accumulation [80]. Sodium bicarbonate in swimming rats was found to prevent gastric retention and acid-based changes caused by exercise [81]. This could help sustain hydration status during exercise and avoid diarrhea or vomiting.
Whey protein isolate, in comparison with casein in C57BL/6J mice on a high-fat diet, increased Lactobacillus murinus and decreased parameters related to obesity. However, this effect was seen in younger but not older mice (5 vs. 10 weeks old) [82]. In another study, whey protein reduced weight gain in young mice but did not affect the microbiota composition significantly [83]. Interestingly, health benefits of whey were not seen in mice with microbiota depleted through antibiotics [84]. In obese animals, whey proteins promote an increase in Bifidobacteria abundance [85]. In addition, cheese whey protein has a protective potential in mild experimental colitis, as it increases Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria counts and mucin production [86]. Citrulline supplementation in rats after small intestine resection (80%) led to nitrogen balance preservation and an increase in the arginine level relative to arginine alone. However, in this research, gut microbiota composition was not tested. [87]. Fourteen days of L-arginine supplementation in mice led to a shift in the Firmicutes–Bacteroidetes ratio, increasing Bacteroidetes counts. This change was associated with the regulation of innate immune signaling [88]. Arginine may also protect from intestinal integrity disruption and bacterial translocation, as observed in mice with intestinal obstruction [89]. Nitrates from diet were not studied in the context of the gut microbiota.

7. Prebiotics, Probiotics and Gut Microbiota—Animal Studies

Supplementation of inulin in male wild-type Groningen rats for 2 weeks increased Bacteroidetes and decreased Firmicutes abundances, along with increased acetate and succinate production [90]. In hyperuricemia mice, inulin enrichment of the diet led to a decrease in toxin levels and an increase in health-promoting Akkermansia bacteria, as well as SCFAs [91]. In a longer period of time, pectins from different food (beet, citrus, and soy) were found to increase Firmicutes and Lactobacillus and decrease Bacteroidetes in male Wistar rats (7 weeks of supplementation), and this shift was found to increase butyrate and propionate production [92]. Beta-glucans reversed gut barrier dysfunction in obese mice fed with a high-fat diet. This phenomenon was accompanied by regulation of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria levels, as well as cognitive changes [93]. Beta-glucans were also found to promote Blautia and Alistipes and inhibit Proteus and Lachnospiraceae and to be beneficial in the ulcerative colitis mouse model [94].
The list of probiotics studied by scientists is constantly expanding, as molecular techniques for describing the bacterial genome have evolved significantly in recent years. Interestingly, probiotic strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Tana or Lactobacillus salivarius subspecies salicinius (SA-03) were isolated from the fecal samples of Olympic athletes and tested in mice for antifatigue effects. In these experiments, probiotic supplementation led to a decrease in lactate, ammonia and creatine kinase [95][96]. Other strains, such as Lactobacillus plantarum (TWK10; from pickled vegetables) and Lactobacillus plantarum (KSFY01; from yak yogurt), increased glycogen storage, muscle mass and strength, and time to exhaustion in mice [97][98]. In rats, Bacillus subtilis (BSB3) was found to prevent negative changes in the gut caused by excessive exercise, and Saccharomyces boulardii (Sb) led to aerobic performance enhancement [99][100].

8. Concluding Remarks and Future Directions

As gut training becomes more popular among athletes, it is necessary to describe future directions in mapping the interactions between different prebiotics, probiotics, and the most popular ergogenic aids. Very little is known about the modulatory effects of the gut microbiota on the ergogenic actions of most supplements.
While initial meta-analyses on probiotic supplementation in endurance athletes have been published, there is a lack of experiments and meta-analyses in resistance athletes. Most data support the use of single-strain probiotics in aerobic athletes. To date, there have been no experiments on the potential impact of sodium bicarbonate and beta-alanine on the guts of athletes. Although citrulline may have positive effects on anaerobic athletes, the impact of nitrates is less clear. Inulin, FOS, β-glucans, and pectins may play protective roles in gastrointestinal homeostasis, but these effects are not limited to aerobic or anaerobic athletes. Of the prebiotics, only beta-glucans were found to enhance the creatine metabolism pathway and have potential as ergogenic agents; however, data are limited. Sport supplements with potential to modulate that gut microbiota are listed in Table 1. Supplements are described as “Possibly effective” if any human or animal research has suggested increases in health-promoting bacteria abundances and gut function, but these conclusions have not been confirmed in larger samples in double-blind, randomized trials. Table 2 lists products related to gut health that could be studied in athletes in search of ergogenic aid. “Effective” supplements are probiotics that have been found to improve recovery, while the “possibly effective” beta-glucan impact on athletic performance needs to be confirmed in well-designed human experiments.
Table 1. Sport supplements and gut microbiota modulation.
Table 2. Gut microbiota modulation and sport performance.
Considering the immune-boosting effects of probiotics, it can be concluded that ergogenic effects are achieved through a decrease in the number of forced days off (rest days related to infections). Meeting the dietary requirements for fiber (different prebiotic fractions) consumption is a possible way to avoid gastrointestinal tract disturbances during the training and competition season and may protect from potentially harmful nutritional extremes, such as a very high-protein or very high-carbohydrate diet. More studies are needed in the field of both pre- and probiotic supplementation for athletes, as well as ergogenic supplementation of the gut microbiota. Before consuming any nutritional supplement, the person concerned should consult a reliable and qualified professional, who must base his claims on scientific evidence, i.e., a sports doctor or a dietician/nutritionist specializing in sports nutrition.


  1. Qin, J.; Li, R.; Raes, J.; Arumugam, M.; Burgdorf, K.S.; Manichanh, C.; Nielsen, T.; Pons, N.; Levenez, F.; Yamada, T.; et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010, 464, 59–65.
  2. Goodrich, J.K.; Davenport, E.R.; Beaumont, M.; Jackson, M.A.; Knight, R.; Ober, C.; Spector, T.D.; Bell, J.T.; Clark, A.G.; Ley, R.E. Genetic Determinants of the Gut Microbiome in UK Twins. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 19, 731–743.
  3. Quercia, S.; Candela, M.; Giuliani, C.; Turroni, S.; Luiselli, D.; Rampelli, S.; Brigidi, P.; Franceschi, C.; Bacalini, M.G.; Garagnani, P.; et al. From lifetime to evolution: Timescales of human gut microbiota adaptation. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 587.
  4. Aya, V.; Flórez, A.; Perez, L.; Ramírez, J.D. Association between physical activity and changes in intestinal microbiota composition: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247039.
  5. Leeming, E.R.; Johnson, A.J.; Spector, T.D.; Le Roy, C.I. Effect of Diet on the Gut Microbiota: Rethinking Intervention Duration. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2862.
  6. Dekkers, K.F.; Sayols-Baixeras, S.; Baldanzi, G.; Nowak, C.; Hammar, U.; Nguyen, D.; Varotsis, G.; Brunkwall, L.; Nielsen, N.; Eklund, A.C.; et al. An online atlas of human plasma metabolite signatures of gut microbiome composition. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5370.
  7. O’Donovan, C.M.; Madigan, S.M.; Garcia-Perez, I.; Rankin, A.; Sullivan, O.O.; Cotter, P. Distinct microbiome composition and metabolome exists across subgroups of elite Irish athletes. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2020, 23, 63–68.
  8. Matenchuk, B.A.; Mandhane, P.J.; Kozyrskyj, A.L. Sleep, circadian rhythm, and gut microbiota. Sleep Med. Rev. 2020, 53, 101340.
  9. Han, H.; Yi, B.; Zhong, R.; Wang, M.; Zhang, S.; Ma, J.; Yin, Y.; Yin, J.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H. From gut microbiota to host appetite: Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as key regulators. Microbiome 2021, 9, 162.
  10. Huang, T.-T.; Lai, J.-B.; Du, Y.-L.; Xu, Y.; Ruan, L.-M.; Hu, S.-H. Current Understanding of Gut Microbiota in Mood Disorders: An Update of Human Studies. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 98.
  11. Guo, R.; Chen, L.-H.; Xing, C.; Liu, T. Pain regulation by gut microbiota: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Br. J. Anaesth. 2019, 123, 637–654.
  12. Tooley, K. Effects of the Human Gut Microbiota on Cognitive Performance, Brain Structure and Function: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3009.
  13. Carabotti, M.; Scirocco, A.; Maselli, M.A.; Severi, C. The gut-brain axis: Interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2015, 28, 203–209.
  14. Enaud, R.; Prevel, R.; Ciarlo, E.; Beaufils, F.; Wieërs, G.; Guery, B.; Delhaes, L. The Gut-Lung Axis in Health and Respiratory Diseases: A Place for Inter-Organ and Inter-Kingdom Crosstalks. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 9.
  15. Przewłócka, K.; Folwarski, M.; Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka, K.; Skonieczna-Żydecka, K.; Kaczor, J. Gut-Muscle AxisExists and May Affect Skeletal Muscle Adaptation to Training. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1451.
  16. Albillos, A.; De Gottardi, A.; Rescigno, M. The gut-liver axis in liver disease: Pathophysiological basis for therapy. J. Hepatol. 2020, 72, 558–577.
  17. Yu, L.W.; Agirman, G.; Hsiao, E.Y. The Gut Microbiome as a Regulator of the Neuroimmune Landscape. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2022, 40, 143–167.
  18. Mach, N.; Fuster-Botella, D. Endurance exercise and gut microbiota: A review. J. Sport Health Sci. 2017, 6, 179–197.
  19. Van Wijck, K.; Lenaerts, K.; Grootjans, J.; Wijnands, K.A.P.; Poeze, M.; Van Loon, L.J.C.; DeJong, C.H.C.; Buurman, W.A. Physiology and pathophysiology of splanchnic hypoperfusion and intestinal injury during exercise: Strategies for evaluation and prevention. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2012, 303, G155–G168.
  20. Vitale, K.; Getzin, A. Nutrition and Supplement Update for the Endurance Athlete: Review and Recommendations. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1289.
  21. Seo, Y.S.; Lee, H.-B.; Kim, Y.; Park, H.-Y. Dietary Carbohydrate Constituents Related to Gut Dysbiosis and Health. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 427.
  22. Wiącek, J.; Szurkowska, J.; Kryściak, J.; Galecka, M.; Karolkiewicz, J. No changes in the abundance of selected fecal bacteria during increased carbohydrates consumption period associated with the racing season in amateur road cyclists. PeerJ 2023, 11, e14594.
  23. Olbricht, H.; Twadell, K.; Sandel, B.; Stephens, C.; Whittall, J.B. Is There a Universal Endurance Microbiota? Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2213.
  24. Kulecka, M.; Fraczek, B.; Mikula, M.; Zeber-Lubecka, N.; Karczmarski, J.; Paziewska, A.; Ambrozkiewicz, F.; Jagusztyn-Krynicka, K.; Cieszczyk, P.; Ostrowski, J. The composition and richness of the gut microbiota differentiate the top Polish endurance athletes from sedentary controls. Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 1374–1384.
  25. Mata, F.; Valenzuela, P.L.; Gimenez, J.; Tur, C.; Ferreria, D.; Domínguez, R.; Sanchez-Oliver, A.J.; Sanz, J.M.M. Carbohydrate Availability and Physical Performance: Physiological Overview and Practical Recommendations. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1084.
  26. Arnold, A.R.; Chassaing, B. Maltodextrin, Modern Stressor of the Intestinal Environment. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 7, 475–476.
  27. Satokari, R. High Intake of Sugar and the Balance between Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Gut Bacteria. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1348.
  28. Ferreira, A.M.J.; Farias-Junior, L.F.; A A Mota, T.; Elsangedy, H.M.; Marcadenti, A.; Lemos, T.M.A.M.; Okano, A.H.; Fayh, A.P.T. Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse and Hydration Strategies on Cycling Performance in 30 Km Time Trial: A Randomized, Crossover, Controlled Trial. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2018, 17, 181–187.
  29. Hadzic, M.; Eckstein, M.L.; Schugardt, M. The Impact of Sodium Bicarbonate on Performance in Response to Exercise Duration in Athletes: A Systematic Review. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2019, 18, 271–281.
  30. Wilson, P. Sport Supplements and the Athlete’s Gut: A Review. Int. J. Sports Med. 2022, 43, 840–849.
  31. Gravina, A.G.; Romeo, M.; Pellegrino, R.; Tuccillo, C.; Federico, A.; Loguercio, C. Just Drink a Glass of Water? Effects of Bicarbonate–Sulfate–Calcium–Magnesium Water on the Gut–Liver Axis. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 869446.
  32. Murakami, S.; Goto, Y.; Ito, K.; Hayasaka, S.; Kurihara, S.; Soga, T.; Tomita, M.; Fukuda, S. The Consumption of Bicarbonate-Rich Mineral Water Improves Glycemic Control. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 824395.
  33. Jukić, I.; Kolobarić, N.; Stupin, A.; Matić, A.; Kozina, N.; Mihaljević, Z.; Mihalj, M.; Šušnjara, P.; Stupin, M.; Ćurić, Ž.B.; et al. Carnosine, Small but Mighty—Prospect of Use as Functional Ingredient for Functional Food Formulation. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1037.
  34. Grgic, J. Effects of beta-alanine supplementation on Yo–Yo test performance: A meta-analysis. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2021, 43, 158–162.
  35. Trexler, E.T.; Smith-Ryan, A.E.; Stout, J.R.; Hoffman, J.R.; Wilborn, C.D.; Sale, C.; Kreider, R.B.; Jäger, R.; Earnest, C.P.; Bannock, L.; et al. International society of sports nutrition position stand: Beta-Alanine. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2015, 12, 30.
  36. Schoenfeld, B.J.; Aragon, A.A. How much protein can the body use in a single meal for muscle-building? Implications for daily protein distribution. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2018, 15, 10.
  37. Wu, S.; Bhat, Z.F.; Gounder, R.S.; Ahmed, I.A.M.; Al-Juhaimi, F.Y.; Ding, Y.; Bekhit, A.E.D. Effect of Dietary Protein and Processing on Gut Microbiota—A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 453.
  38. Bartlett, A.; Kleiner, M. Dietary protein and the intestinal microbiota: An understudied relationship. iScience 2022, 25, 105313.
  39. Szurkowska, J.; Wiącek, J.; Laparidis, K.; Karolkiewicz, J. A Comparative Study of Selected Gut Bacteria Abundance and Fecal pH in Bodybuilders Eating High-Protein Diet and More Sedentary Controls. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4093.
  40. Daher, J.; Mallick, M.; El Khoury, D. Prevalence of Dietary Supplement Use among Athletes Worldwide: A Scoping Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4109.
  41. Aslam, H.; Marx, W.; Rocks, T.; Loughman, A.; Chandrasekaran, V.; Ruusunen, A.; Dawson, S.L.; West, M.; Mullarkey, E.; Pasco, J.A.; et al. The effects of dairy and dairy derivatives on the gut microbiota: A systematic literature review. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1799533.
  42. Lassen, P.B.; Belda, E.; Prifti, E.; Dao, M.C.; Specque, F.; Henegar, C.; Rinaldi, L.; Wang, X.; Kennedy, S.P.; Zucker, J.-D.; et al. Protein supplementation during an energy-restricted diet induces visceral fat loss and gut microbiota amino acid metabolism activation: A randomized trial. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15620.
  43. Feng, C.; Tian, L.; Hong, H.; Wang, Q.; Zhan, X.; Luo, Y.; Tan, Y. In Vitro Gut Fermentation of Whey Protein Hydrolysate: An Evaluation of Its Potential Modulation on Infant Gut Microbiome. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1374.
  44. Moreno-Pérez, D.; Bressa, C.; Bailén, M.; Hamed-Bousdar, S.; Naclerio, F.; Carmona, M.; Pérez, M.; González-Soltero, R.; Montalvo-Lominchar, M.G.; Carabaña, C.; et al. Effect of a Protein Supplement on the Gut Microbiota of Endurance Athletes: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study. Nutrients 2018, 10, 337.
  45. Schaafsma, A.; Mallee, L.; Belt, M.V.D.; Floris, E.; Kortman, G.; Veldman, J.; Ende, D.V.D.; Kardinaal, A. The Effect of a Whey-Protein and Galacto-Oligosaccharides Based Product on Parameters of Sleep Quality, Stress, and Gut Microbiota in Apparently Healthy Adults with Moderate Sleep Disturbances: A Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2204.
  46. Ashaolu, T.J. Soy bioactive peptides and the gut microbiota modulation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 9009–9017.
  47. Gonzalez, A.M.; Trexler, E.T. Effects of Citrulline Supplementation on Exercise Performance in Humans: A Review of the Current Literature. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2020, 34, 1480–1495.
  48. Gough, L.A.; Sparks, S.A.; McNaughton, L.R.; Higgins, M.F.; Newbury, J.W.; Trexler, E.; Faghy, M.A.; Bridge, C.A. A critical review of citrulline malate supplementation and exercise performance. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2021, 121, 3283–3295.
  49. Van Wijck, K.; Wijnands, K.A.P.; Meesters, D.; Boonen, B.; Van Loon, L.J.; Buurman, W.A.; Dejong, C.H.C.; Lenaerts, K.; Poeze, M. L-Citrulline Improves Splanchnic Perfusion and Reduces Gut Injury during Exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2014, 46, 2039–2046.
  50. Curis, E.; Crenn, P.; Cynober, L. Citrulline and the gut. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2007, 10, 620–626.
  51. Viribay, A.; Burgos, J.; Fernández-Landa, J.; Seco-Calvo, J.; Mielgo-Ayuso, J. Effects of Arginine Supplementation on Athletic Performance Based on Energy Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1300.
  52. Xie, F.; Liu, Z.; Liu, M.; Chen, L.; Ding, W.; Zhang, H. Amino Acids Regulate Glycolipid Metabolism and Alter Intestinal Microbial Composition. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2020, 21, 761–765.
  53. Zheng, X.; He, J.; Wang, L.; Zhou, S.; Peng, X.; Huang, S.; Zheng, L.; Cheng, L.; Hao, Y.; Li, J.; et al. Ecological Effect of Arginine on Oral Microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7206.
  54. Rocha, B.S.; Laranjinha, J. Nitrate from diet might fuel gut microbiota metabolism: Minding the gap between redox signaling and inter-kingdom communication. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2020, 149, 37–43.
  55. González-Soltero, R.; Bailén, M.; De Lucas, B.; Ramírez-Goercke, M.I.; Pareja-Galeano, H.; Larrosa, M. Role of Oral and Gut Microbiota in Dietary Nitrate Metabolism and Its Impact on Sports Performance. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3611.
  56. Leclerc, M.; Bedu-Ferrari, C.; Etienne-Mesmin, L.; Mariadassou, M.; Lebreuilly, L.; Tran, S.-L.; Brazeau, L.; Mayeur, C.; Delmas, J.; Rué, O.; et al. Nitric Oxide Impacts Human Gut Microbiota Diversity and Functionalities. mSystems 2021, 6, e0055821.
  57. Bai, Y.; Gilbert, R.G. Mechanistic Understanding of the Effects of Pectin on In Vivo Starch Digestion: A Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5107.
  58. Pascale, N.; Gu, F.; Larsen, N.; Jespersen, L.; Respondek, F. The Potential of Pectins to Modulate the Human Gut Microbiota Evaluated by In Vitro Fermentation: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3629.
  59. Sutehall, S.; Muniz-Pardos, B.; Bosch, A.; Pitsiladis, Y. The Effect of Sodium Alginate and Pectin Added to a Carbohydrate Beverage on Endurance Performance, Substrate Oxidation and Blood Glucose Concentration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med. Open 2022, 8, 82.
  60. Flood, T.; Montanari, S.; Wicks, M.; Blanchard, J.; Sharpe, H.; Taylor, L.; Kuennen, M.R.; Lee, B.J. Addition of pectin-alginate to a carbohydrate beverage does not maintain gastrointestinal barrier function during exercise in hot-humid conditions better than carbohydrate ingestion alone. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2020, 45, 1145–1155.
  61. Mitchell, C.M.; Davy, B.M.; Ponder, M.A.; McMillan, R.P.; Hughes, M.D.; Hulver, M.W.; Neilson, A.P.; Davy, K.P. Prebiotic Inulin Supplementation and Peripheral Insulin Sensitivity in adults at Elevated Risk for Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3235.
  62. Williams, C.J.; Torquati, L.; Li, Z.; A Lea, R.; Croci, I.; Keating, E.; Little, J.P.; Eynon, N.; Coombes, J.S. Oligofructose-Enriched Inulin Intake, Gut Microbiome Characteristics, and the V˙O2 Peak Response to High-Intensity Interval Training in Healthy Inactive Adults. J. Nutr. 2021, 152, 680–689.
  63. Dou, Y.; Yu, X.; Luo, Y.; Chen, B.; Ma, D.; Zhu, J. Effect of Fructooligosaccharides Supplementation on the Gut Microbiota in Human: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3298.
  64. Jayachandran, M.; Chen, J.; Chung, S.S.M.; Xu, B. A critical review on the impacts of β-glucans on gut microbiota and human health. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 61, 101–110.
  65. Wang, H.; Chen, G.; Li, X.; Zheng, F.; Zeng, X. Yeast β-glucan, a potential prebiotic, showed a similar probiotic activity to inulin. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 10386–10396.
  66. Wang, R.; Wu, X.; Lin, K.; Guo, S.; Hou, Y.; Ma, R.; Wang, Q.; Wang, R. Plasma Metabolomics Reveals β-Glucan Improves Muscle Strength and Exercise Capacity in Athletes. Metabolites 2022, 12, 988.
  67. Zabriskie, H.A.; Blumkaitis, J.C.; Moon, J.M.; Currier, B.S.; Stefan, R.; Ratliff, K.; Harty, P.S.; Stecker, R.A.; Rudnicka, K.; Jäger, R.; et al. Yeast Beta-Glucan Supplementation Downregulates Markers of Systemic Inflammation after Heated Treadmill Exercise. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1144.
  68. Rao, R.K. Protection and Restitution of Gut Barrier by Probiotics: Nutritional and Clinical Implications. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2013, 9, 99–107.
  69. Rowland, I.; Gibson, G.; Heinken, A.; Scott, K.; Swann, J.; Thiele, I.; Tuohy, K. Gut microbiota functions: Metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 1–24.
  70. Wang, J.; Wu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Hu, Z. Gut microbiota and calcium balance. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1033933.
  71. Yilmaz, B.; Li, H. Gut Microbiota and Iron: The Crucial Actors in Health and Disease. Pharmaceuticals 2018, 11, 98.
  72. Santibañez-Gutierrez, A.; Fernández-Landa, J.; Calleja-González, J.; Delextrat, A.; Mielgo-Ayuso, J. Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Exercise with Predominance of Aerobic Metabolism in Trained Population: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Nutrients 2022, 14, 622.
  73. Giron, M.; Thomas, M.; Dardevet, D.; Chassard, C.; Savary-Auzeloux, I. Gut microbes and muscle function: Can probiotics make our muscles stronger? J. Cachex Sarcopenia Muscle 2022, 13, 1460–1476.
  74. Di Dio, M.; Calella, P.; Cerullo, G.; Pelullo, C.P.; Di Onofrio, V.; Gallè, F.; Liguori, G. Effects of Probiotics Supplementation on Risk and Severity of Infections in Athletes: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11534.
  75. Guo, Y.-T.; Peng, Y.-C.; Yen, H.-Y.; Wu, J.-C.; Hou, W.-H. Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Immune and Inflammatory Markers in Athletes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Medicina 2022, 58, 1188.
  76. Kennedy, E.A.; King, K.Y.; Baldridge, M.T. Mouse Microbiota Models: Comparing Germ-Free Mice and Antibiotics Treatment as Tools for Modifying Gut Bacteria. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1534.
  77. Fernández, J.; Fernández-Sanjurjo, M.; Iglesias-Gutiérrez, E.; Martínez-Camblor, P.; Villar, C.J.; Tomás-Zapico, C.; Fernández-García, B.; Lombó, F. Resistance and Endurance Exercise Training Induce Differential Changes in Gut Microbiota Composition in Murine Models. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 748854.
  78. Laudisi, F.; Di Fusco, D.; Dinallo, V.; Stolfi, C.; Di Grazia, A.; Marafini, I.; Colantoni, A.; Ortenzi, A.; Alteri, C.; Guerrieri, F.; et al. The Food Additive Maltodextrin Promotes Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress–Driven Mucus Depletion and Exacerbates Intestinal Inflammation. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 7, 457–473.
  79. Sun, L.; Sun, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, K.; Zheng, K.; Xiang, Q.; Xiang, Q.; et al. Antibiotic-Induced Disruption of Gut Microbiota Alters Local Metabolomes and Immune Responses. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 99.
  80. Brencher, L.; Verhaegh, R.; Kirsch, M. Attenuation of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion-injury by β-alanine: A potentially glycine-receptor mediated effect. J. Surg. Res. 2017, 211, 233–241.
  81. Silva, M.T.B.; Palheta-Junior, R.C.; Sousa, D.F.; Fonseca-Magalhães, P.A.; Okoba, W.; Campos, C.P.S.; Oliveira, R.B.; Magalhães, P.J.C.; Santos, A.A. Sodium bicarbonate treatment prevents gastric emptying delay caused by acute exercise in awake rats. J. Appl. Physiol. 2014, 116, 1133–1141.
  82. Boscaini, S.; Cabrera-Rubio, R.; Nychyk, O.; Speakman, J.R.; Cryan, J.F.; Cotter, P.D.; Nilaweera, K.N. Age- and duration-dependent effects of whey protein on high-fat diet-induced changes in body weight, lipid metabolism, and gut microbiota in mice. Physiol. Rep. 2020, 8, e14523.
  83. Tranberg, B.; Hellgren, L.I.; Lykkesfeldt, J.; Sejrsen, K.; Jeamet, A.; Rune, I.; Ellekilde, M.; Nielsen, D.S.; Hansen, A.K. Whey Protein Reduces Early Life Weight Gain in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71439.
  84. Boscaini, S.; Cabrera-Rubio, R.; Golubeva, A.; Nychyk, O.; Fülling, C.; Speakman, J.R.; Cotter, P.D.; Cryan, J.F.; Nilaweera, K.N. Depletion of the gut microbiota differentially affects the impact of whey protein on high-fat diet-induced obesity and intestinal permeability. Physiol. Rep. 2021, 9, e14867.
  85. Świątecka, D.; Złotkowska, D.; Markiewicz, L.H.; Szyc, A.M.; Wróblewska, B. Impact of whey proteins on the systemic and local intestinal level of mice with diet induced obesity. Food Funct. 2017, 8, 1708–1717.
  86. Sprong, R.; Schonewille, A.; Van Der Meer, R. Dietary cheese whey protein protects rats against mild dextran sulfate sodium–induced colitis: Role of mucin and microbiota. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 1364–1371.
  87. Osowska, S.; Moinard, C.; Loï, C.; Neveux, N.; Cynober, L. Citrulline increases arginine pools and restores nitrogen balance after massive intestinal resection. Gut 2004, 53, 1781–1786.
  88. Ren, W.; Chen, S.; Yin, J.; Duan, J.; Li, T.; Liu, G.; Feng, Z.; Tan, B.; Yin, Y.; Wu, G. Dietary Arginine Supplementation of Mice Alters the Microbial Population and Activates Intestinal Innate Immunity. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 988–995.
  89. Viana, M.L.; Santos, R.G.; Generoso, S.V.; Arantes, R.M.; Correia, M.I.T.; Cardoso, V.N. Pretreatment with arginine preserves intestinal barrier integrity and reduces bacterial translocation in mice. Nutrition 2010, 26, 218–223.
  90. Ferrario, C.; Statello, R.; Carnevali, L.; Mancabelli, L.; Milani, C.; Mangifesta, M.; Duranti, S.; Lugli, G.A.; Jimenez, B.; Lodge, S.; et al. How to Feed the Mammalian Gut Microbiota: Bacterial and Metabolic Modulation by Dietary Fibers. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1749.
  91. Guo, Y.; Yu, Y.; Li, H.; Ding, X.; Li, X.; Jing, X.; Chen, J.; Liu, G.; Lin, Y.; Jiang, C.; et al. Inulin supplementation ameliorates hyperuricemia and modulates gut microbiota in Uox-knockout mice. Eur. J. Nutr. 2020, 60, 2217–2230.
  92. Tian, L.; Scholte, J.; Borewicz, K.; Bogert, B.V.D.; Smidt, H.; Scheurink, A.J.; Gruppen, H.; Schols, H.A. Effects of pectin supplementation on the fermentation patterns of different structural carbohydrates in rats. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2016, 60, 2256–2266.
  93. Shi, H.; Yu, Y.; Lin, D.; Zheng, P.; Hu, M.; Wang, Q.; Pan, W.; Yang, X.; Hu, T.; Li, Q.; et al. β-glucan attenuates cognitive impairment via the gut-brain axis in diet-induced obese mice. Microbiome 2020, 8, 143.
  94. Liu, C.; Sun, C.; Cheng, Y. β-Glucan alleviates mice with ulcerative colitis through interactions between gut microbes and amino acids metabolism. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022.
  95. Lee, M.-C.; Chen, M.-J.; Huang, H.-W.; Wu, W.-K.; Lee, Y.-W.; Kuo, H.-C.; Huang, C.-C. Probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Tana Isolated from an International Weightlifter Enhances Exercise Performance and Promotes Antifatigue Effects in Mice. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3308.
  96. Lee, M.-C.; Hsu, Y.-J.; Ho, H.-H.; Hsieh, S.-H.; Kuo, Y.-W.; Sung, H.-C.; Huang, C.-C. Lactobacillus salivarius Subspecies salicinius SA-03 is a New Probiotic Capable of Enhancing Exercise Performance and Decreasing Fatigue. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 545.
  97. Lee, C.-C.; Liao, Y.-C.; Lee, M.-C.; Lin, K.-J.; Hsu, H.-Y.; Chiou, S.-Y.; Young, S.-L.; Lin, J.-S.; Huang, C.-C.; Watanabe, K. Lactobacillus plantarum TWK10 Attenuates Aging-Associated Muscle Weakness, Bone Loss, and Cognitive Impairment by Modulating the Gut Microbiome in Mice. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 708096.
  98. Chen, Q.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, F. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum KSFY01 on the exercise capacity of D-galactose-induced oxidative stress-aged mice. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1030833.
  99. Ducray, H.A.G.; Globa, L.; Pustovyy, O.; Roberts, M.D.; Rudisill, M.; Vodyanoy, V.; Sorokulova, I. Prevention of excessive exercise-induced adverse effects in rats with Bacillus subtilis BSB3. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 128, 1163–1178.
  100. Soares, A.D.N.; Wanner, S.P.; Morais, E.S.S.; Hudson, A.S.R.; Martins, F.S.; Cardoso, V.N. Supplementation with Saccharomyces boulardii Increases the Maximal Oxygen Consumption and Maximal Aerobic Speed Attained by Rats Subjected to an Incremental-Speed Exercise. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2352.
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : ,
View Times: 186
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 05 Jun 2023
Video Production Service