Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Jacek Staszewski
 -- 3285 2023-05-18 10:51:15 |
2 Format correct
Wendy Huang
 Meta information modification 3285 2023-05-18 11:00:51 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?
Send video materials Upload full video

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Staszewski, J.; Lazarewicz, N.; Konczak, J.; Migdal, I.; Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska, E. Up-Frameshift Protein 1 in Human Disorders. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/44478 (accessed on 26 July 2024).
Staszewski J, Lazarewicz N, Konczak J, Migdal I, Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska E. Up-Frameshift Protein 1 in Human Disorders. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/44478. Accessed July 26, 2024.
Staszewski, Jacek, Natalia Lazarewicz, Julia Konczak, Iwona Migdal, Ewa Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska. "Up-Frameshift Protein 1 in Human Disorders" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/44478 (accessed July 26, 2024).
Staszewski, J., Lazarewicz, N., Konczak, J., Migdal, I., & Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska, E. (2023, May 18). Up-Frameshift Protein 1 in Human Disorders. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/44478
Staszewski, Jacek, et al. "Up-Frameshift Protein 1 in Human Disorders." Encyclopedia. Web. 18 May, 2023.
Up-Frameshift Protein 1 in Human Disorders
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/cells12030419

Up-frameshift protein 1 (UPF1) plays the role of a vital controller for transcripts, ready to react in the event of an incorrect translation mechanism. It is well known as one of the key elements involved in mRNA decay pathways and participates in transcript and protein quality control in several different aspects. Firstly, UPF1 specifically degrades premature termination codon (PTC)-containing products in a nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD)-coupled manner. Additionally, UPF1 can potentially act as an E3 ligase and degrade target proteins independently from mRNA decay pathways. Thus, UPF1 protects cells against the accumulation of misfolded polypeptides. However, this multitasking protein may still hide many of its functions and abilities.

up-frameshift protein 1 helicase human disorders

1. UPF1 Structure

Sequential and structural analyses of yeast and human UPF1s revealed that they are remarkably similar proteins that fold into a characteristic helicase core with several regulatory domains [1][2] (Figure 1). Properties of those domains have been studied to elucidate their importance and regulatory effects on UPF1 role as RNA-dependent ATPase, RNA/DNA helicase and beyond. In particular, the conserved cysteine/histidine-rich domain (CH-domain) is essential for all known functions of UPF1, including its putative ubiquitin ligase activity [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Following that, despite the several differences in the triggering mechanism of yeast and human NMDs, phosphorylation and dephosphorylation seem to be of considerable importance for both the proper activation of UPF1 and its further function in aberrant mRNA decay [5][9][10][11][12]. Numerous factors responsible for those processes, e.g., UPF2 and UPF3 (up-frameshift two and three nonsense-mediated mRNA decay factors), the suppressor of morphogenesis in genitalia-1 (SMG1) kinase, PP2A (protein phosphatase 2A), SMG5-7 and the exon junction complex (EJC), have been identified in humans and characterized for a better understanding of UPF1–protein complex associations, remodeling and NMD activation [6][9][13][14][15][16].
Cells 12 00419 g001 550
Figure 1. Domain structure of human UPF1 and yeast Upf1 proteins. Cysteine–histidine-rich domain (CH) marked as a green box. Helicase domain (HD) bound with a dashed line box containing stalk region as gray, RecA-like 1A as wheat, RecA-like 2A as yellow and 1B and 1C subdomains as orange and red boxes, respectively. Region rich in serine/glutamine/proline repeats (SQs) marked as cyan box.
Yeast Upf1, otherwise known as the nuclear accommodation of mitochondria (Nam7), is a 109 kDa protein, whereas human UPF1, also described as the regulator of nonsense transcripts 1 (RENT1) or SMG2, is larger and has a mass of 130 kDa [17][18]. As a result of alternative splicing, human UPF1 exists in two isoforms. UPF1SL from the “short loop” consists of 1118 amino acid residues, whereas the “long loop” UPF1LL differs only in the length of a regulatory loop in the 1B domain due to 11 amino acid insertions. Usually, UPF1 refers to the shorter version, which accounts for the majority of UPF1 mRNA [19][20]. Both human and yeast proteins contain a characteristic helicase core structure and main 5′-3′ RNA unwinding activity [1][2][17][21][22][23]. In general, helicases can be divided into several superfamilies (SF). Structural and functional studies divide such families into two groups: those forming toroidal multimeric structures (SF3-6) and two superfamilies of nontoroidal helicases SF1 and SF2 [24]. Based on structural aspects of the helicase core, UPF1 is classified as a member of SF1 [17][24]. Applequist et al. showed that the short isoform sequence of human UPF1 (UPF1SL) is highly similar to previously characterized yeast Upf1 protein, with a 51% identity match. The human UPF1 helicase domain, such as yeast Upf1, consists of seven motifs typical to SF1 and SF2 helicases, but also possesses some additional regions, rich in proline/glycine and containing serine/glutamine and serine/glutamine/proline repeats (SQs). Both proteins assume an almost identical monomeric structure with two major domains [1][2] (Figure 1). In proximity to N-terminus lies a zinc-finger region, rich in cysteine and histidine residues (CH-domain), followed by the helicase domain (HD) comprised of previously mentioned seven common ATPase and helicase motifs within two RecA-like folds [1][2] (Figure 1).

2. The Function of UPF1 in Human Diseases

UPF1 plays a substantial role in various human diseases. Its aberrant forms that lead to the dysregulation of NMD were ascertained in numerous types of cancer [25], as well as neurodevelopmental and degenerative disorders [26][27]. UPF1-mediated RNA decay pathways, such as NMD, SMD and SRD, target viral RNAs yielding a decreased efficiency of infection [28]. There are also working antiprion yeast systems that depend on the UPF1 function, with potential applications in human prion infections [29]. Table 1 comprises selected diseases, associated aberrations of UPF1 and other factors, as well as the consequences of those defects.
Table 1. Role of UPF1 in various human diseases. Abbreviations: EMT—epithelial–mesenchymal transition; lncRNA—long noncoding RNA; PVT1—plasmacytoma variant translocation 1; ATF3—activating transcription factor 3; TumiD—Tudor-staphylococcal/micrococcal-like nuclease (TSN)-mediated miRNA decay; RISC—RNA-induced silencing complex.
Disease Aberration Effect References
Cancer Types
bladder cancer methylation of RISC components, leading to increased UPF1 binding augmented TumiD, upregulated expression of proinvasive proteins and G1-to-S-phase transition [30]
breast cancer (BC) UPF1 downregulation by binding with lncRNA PVT1 EMT, proliferation and metastasis [31]
colorectal cancer (CRC) UPF1 downregulation (microsatellite instable (MSI) CRC)/upregulation (microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC) EMT, stemness maintenance and oxaliplatin chemoresistance [32][33][34][35]
endometrial cancer (EC) UPF1 upregulation stem cell phenotype, metastasis, relapse, chemoresistance and interaction with lncRNA LINC00963 and miRNA miR-508-5p [36]
gastric cancer (GC) UPF1 downregulation and promoter hypermethylation proliferation, cell cycle progression and interactions with lncRNA MALAT1 [37]
glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) elevated UPF1 transcriptional levels by ATF3 malignant phenotype, cell stemness and self-renewal [38]
glioma UPF1 downregulation by binding with lncRNA PVT1 tumor progression and proliferation [39]
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) UPF1 downregulation and promoter hypermethylation lower interaction with suppressive lncRNAs—UCA1; SNHG6, migration, proliferation and EMT [40][41][42]
inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) UPF1 downregulation, somatic mutations and aberrant splicing NMD downregulation, immune infiltration, elevated chemokines and IgE levels—IMT characteristics [43]
nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) UPF1 downregulation and splice site mutations neoantigenic aberrant splicing isoforms of proteins [44]
lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) UPF1 downregulation/upregulation EMT, proliferation, invasion and interactions with lncRNA ZFPM2-AS1 [45][46]
ovarian cancer (OC) UPF1 downregulation by binding with lncRNA DANCR metastasis, proliferation and migration [47]
pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) UPF1 downregulation, genomic point mutations and aberrant splicing disruption of exonic and intronic splicing enhancers and NMD target accumulation [48]
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) UPF1 mRNA editing elevated asparagine synthetase (NMD target) and tumor growth caused by asparagine uptake [49]
prostate cancer UPF1 cytoplasmic localization instead of nuclear progression, metastasis, proliferation, cell growth and interactions with plakophilins (PKP) 1 and 3 (cell–cell contacts) [50]
Neurological Disorders
fragile X syndrome (FXS) UPF1 upregulation through loss of its repressor—fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) FXS phenotype, intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorders, NMD misregulation and molecular abnormalities [27]
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) - - - mitigated neurotoxicity of a G4C2 hexanucleotide repeat expansion in the C9orf72 gene, the most common factor leading to ALS and FTD [26][51][52]
spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) extensive UPF1 targeting of partially functional mutated SMN1 (survival motor neuron) mRNA with premature stop codon complete loss of SMN1 leading to haploinsufficiency and neurodegeneration [53][54]
epilepsy UPF1 upregulation increased NMD, more frequent seizures and epileptogenesis [55]
Viral Infections
Ebola UPF1 hijacked by Ebola genome promotes viral replication [56]
HIV UPF1 hijacked by HIV genome increased infectivity crucial for virion assemble [57]
RNA and DNA viral infections - - - viral genomes as targets to UPF1-mediated SMD and SRD due to their policistronic organization and high GC content [28]
Antiprion Systems
prion infections - - - proposed yeast model of antiprion system depending on Upf1 activity for studying human prion infections [58]

2.1. UPF1 in Cancer

UPF1 is downregulated in numerous cancers, which correlates with poor prognosis and low overall survival (OS) rates. Its low expression causes the dysfunction of NMD, increased levels of toxic transcripts and, consecutively, tumor initiation and progression [25][31][32][34][37][39][40][41][42][43][44][47][48]. Additionally, UPF1 acts in various signaling pathways and promotes undifferentiated stem cell phenotypes, proliferation and metastases. Along with different levels of expression, epigenetic and genetic alterations, as well as the aberrant splicing of UPF1 [31][48], have been demonstrated. Epigenetic alterations, such as the hypermethylation of promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes, lead to the downregulation of their expression and influence tumorigenesis [59][60]. The UPF1 putative promoter region possesses an enriched CpG island in gastric cancer (GC), which was proved to be hypermethylated [37]. Hypermethylation was also detected in hepatocellular cancer (HCC). Treatment with the DNA-demethylating drug 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine increases UPF1 mRNA and protein levels in both GC and HCC [37].
As transcription regulation is disrupted in cancer cells, the accumulation of aberrant transcripts has been observed in tumors [61], detected additionally in such high levels due to the downregulation of the NMD factor, most importantly UPF1, in various cancer types [25]. In cell lines derived from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), such aberrant splicing isoforms have been identified as potential templates for producing neoantigens, as some of those forms were proved to be translated into several peptides [44]. Clinical lung cancer specimens were also analyzed for the search of aberrant forms and neoantigens in cancer cells in vivo, with each examined patient possessing such isoforms. A total of 2021 novel isoforms were identified. Such a large number has been proposed to be the result of impaired NMD, as ~30% of those isoforms contained PTCs that should be targeted by UPF1 [44]. An impairment in splicing can also be due to mutations in splicing-related factors, such as U2AF1 (the U2 auxiliary factor 35 kDa subunit) and SF3B1 (splicing factor 3B subunit 1), frequently found in several types of solid tumors. U2AF1 and SF3B1 are the core components of spliceosomes that have been proposed as novel therapeutic targets for cancer [62].
Numerous somatic mutations of the UPF1 gene have been ascertained in pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) and stated as the first known unique molecular markers of ASC [48]. The perturbation of NMD resulting from those tumor-specific mutations significantly increases the number of aberrant mRNAs that should be targeted by UPF1-mediated NMD. Notably, other NMD factors, namely, UPF2, UPF3A and UPF3B genes, did not display any detectable mutations in analyzed ASC samples. The point mutations gathered in two regions, one embracing exons 10 and 11 and intron 10 in RNA the helicase domain, and a second one consisting of exons 21–23 coding the SQ domain and the ST-Q motif and introns 21 and 22. These mutations are equally distributed among exons and introns, triggering the alternative splicing of UPF1 pre-mRNAs by disrupting intrinsic splicing enhancers (ISEs) and exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs) [48]. Those unique mutations are beneficial for ASC diagnosis and create the possibility for NMD substrate-targeted therapies.
The epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) contributes to tumor metastasis, and is regulated by various signaling pathways [33][63]. One of the most important is the TGF-β (transforming growth factor beta) signaling pathway, which induces the EMT through activating Smad signaling [64][65]. Overexpressed UPF1 inhibits TGF-β signaling component genes, MIXL1 and SOX17. Upregulated UPF1 decreases the expression of Smad2/3 proteins, which, in turn, leads to the inhibition of TGF-β signaling [46]. Furthermore, UPF1 alters Smad2/3 phosphorylation, which is required for signal transduction [42]. In colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and cell lines, UPF1 has been found to be significantly upregulated and exhibit a positive correlation with lymph node metastasis and shorter survival, thus, acting as an oncogene. UPF1 knockout (KO) in colorectal cell lines increases the number of cells in the S phase, therefore, UPF1 promotes cell cycle progression. Furthermore, UPF1 KO promotes apoptosis via increasing DNA damage and inhibiting cell migration, invasion and EMT, as it leads to a higher expression of the epithelial marker E-cadherin and decreased levels of the mesenchymal marker vimentin [33]. UPF1 in CRC can act as a promising diagnostic marker and target for novel therapies.
The upregulation of UPF1 in CRC also leads to chemoresistance in vivo and in vitro to oxaliplatin, a third-generation platinum coordination complex, used for treatment in several types of cancer. Chemoresistance results from the SMG1-dependent phosphorylation of the human topoisomerase II-α (TOP2A) and the maintenance of cell stemness [32]. TOP2A organizes the genome structure, promotes chromosome segregation and is overexpressed in multiple tumors, leading to aggressive phenotypes of the disease and poor prognosis [65][66]. Post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination and SUMOylation, regulate TOP2A activity [67]. SMG1 directly phosphorylates UPF1 and possibly induces TOP2A phosphorylation through UPF1. Moreover, UPF1 enhances the stem phenotype of CRC cells in a TOP2A-dependent manner. The underlying mechanism of oxaliplatin chemoresistance possibly arises from the attenuation of DNA damage resulting from TOP2A, induced by oxaliplatin as the phosphorylation of TOP2A increases its enzymatic activity. TOP2A was also proved to be upregulated in CRC. Notably, this chemoresistance was subverted with TOP2A silencing [32]. These results pointed out new possible targets for decreasing oxaliplatin chemoresistance in CRC patients.
LncRNA and microRNA can interact with UPF1, resulting in its tumor-suppressive functions in various cancers [68]. In HCC, UPF1 interacts with lncRNA SNHG6 (small nucleolar RNA host gene 6) and suppresses cell proliferation and migration through inhibiting the TGF-β/Smad pathway. SNHG6 represses Smad7 expression and, in turn, induces Smad2/3 phosphorylation [40][42]. Moreover, in CRC, SNHG6 KO led to decreased UPF1 and p-Smad2/3 levels [34]. Another lncRNA engaged in the TGF-β/Smad pathway is SNAI3-AS1, which mediates cell invasion. After the direct interaction of SNAI3-AS1 with UPF1, the tumorigenesis of HCC is suppressed. Additionally, SNAI3-AS1 KO significantly decreases the levels of p-Smad2/3 [69]. Upregulated in HCC miR-1468, which promotes cell proliferation and colony formation, targets UPF1, leading to its downregulation in HCC. The plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (PVT1) lncRNA upregulated in breast cancer (BC) has been proposed to act as an oncogene through binding miR-128-3p and UPF1 and promoting EMT and, thus, proliferation and metastasis [31]. Sponging miR-128-3p via competitive binding with PVT1 leads to the upregulation of FOXQ1, which is responsible for inducing EMT through e-cadherin repression [70]. Additionally, miR-128-3p was found to be downregulated in BC [31]. Therefore, PVT1 can serve as a potential therapeutic target in BC. In GC, where UPF1 expression is downregulated due to promoter hypermethylation, a negative correlation between the lncRNA MALAT 1 (metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1) has been observed. The UPF1 inhibition of gastric cancer progression was reduced by high levels of MALAT1, demonstrating a promising target for gastric cancer treatment [37]. Moreover, the miR-seq data show that the degradation of nearly 50% of potential TumiD substrates in human T24 bladder cancer cells was enhanced through UPF1. UPF1 causes the dissociation of miRNA from their mRNA targets, making them vulnerable to TumiD. One example of targeted miRNA is miR-31-5p, which has been correlated with aggressive tumor phenotypes, cell invasion and poor prognosis in breast and bladder cancer. In the case of BC, miR-31-5p is epigenetically silenced, while, in bladder cancer, TumiD plays a regulatory role in determining the miR-31-5p levels. By reducing miRNA amounts, oncogenic genes can be upregulated, which, in turn, leads to tumorigenesis and metastasis [30].

2.2. UPF1 in Neurological Disorders

NMD targets are expressed throughout the brain, with more than 90% identified in the cerebral cortex, which is responsible for cognitive functions, such as attention, memory and overall consciousness. Many of those targets are significantly increased by UPF1 knockdown (KD), and are mutated or misregulated in neuronal diseases, such as spastic paraparesis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and autism spectrum disorder [27]. Recently, the fragile X mental retardation protein FMRP, of which the loss of function is the main cause of intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorders in fragile X syndrome (FXS) [71][72], has been identified as a direct NMD-activated phosphorylated UPF1 interactor, influencing its activity by acting as its repressor. That interplay led to the conclusion that the downregulation of substantial neuronal mRNA in FXS is caused by the stimulation of NMD through FMRP loss [27]. The neuroprotective function through RNA binding and helicase activity of UPF1 independent of the NMD pathway has been shown in several in vitro and in vivo models of ALS [26]. Overexpressed UPF1 mitigates the neurotoxicity of a G4C2 hexanucleotide repeat expansion in the C9orf72 gene, ascertained to be the most common factor inducing familial and sporadic ALS and FTD [51][52].
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neurodegenerative disorder caused by mutations in the SMN1 (survival motor neuron 1) gene, affecting splicing and leading to the production of PTC harboring less stable transcripts extensively targeted by NMD, aggravating the disease phenotype [53][54]. Some truncated proteins, despite being able to partially retain their functionality, are degraded by NMD, which causes haploinsufficiency [73].
Moreover, the link between NMD and epileptogenesis has been examined [55]. Mooney et al. investigated UPF1 and its phosphorylated form, as well as UPF2 and UPF3B levels in a mouse hippocampus after status epilepticus. They described an increase in UPF1, phosphorylated UPF1 and UPF2 in their model, and a mainly neuronal distribution of UPF1. They also ascertained higher levels of UPF1 in human hippocampi from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). As miR-128, which targets the NMD system, including UPF1, is decreased in human epilepsy [74], it can be the cause of increased UPF1 levels. Additionally, the increased binding of UPF1 to the 3′ UTR regions of transcripts in mice has been presented. Mice treated with an NMD inhibitor, NMDI14 [75], had less spontaneous seizures and lower daily seizure rates. All those results suggested an elevated NMD associated with status epilepticus in the hippocampus, leading to epilepsy emergence and progression. The NMD system could possibly act as a target for seizure prevention.

2.3. UPF1 in Viral Infections

As stated above, UPF1 plays an essential role in viral infection development. In 2022, Fang et al. analyzed the interactome of the Ebola virus (EBOV) polymerase, and found that UPF1, collectively with another mRNA decay factor, GSPT1 (G1 to S phase transition protein 1 homolog), interacts with EBOV polymerase to promote viral replication. At the onset of the infection, UPF1 leads to a reduction in vRNA and mRNAs levels and fewer cells that are infected, while GSPT1 KD decreased the vRNA level but increased mRNA levels. In later infection, UPF1 and GSPT1 are hijacked, and promote viral replication [56]. In a similar manner, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) exploits UPF1 to increase its infectivity. The depletion of UPF1 through siRNA reduces the infectivity of HIV virions by altering their reverse transcription. UPF1 is crucial for virus assembly and its function seems to be independent from NMD [57]. In the future, mutants of UPF1 with impaired ATP-binding or hydrolysis activity could serve as inhibitors of HIV virion infectivity. Additionally, genomes of viruses can also be targets to alternative UPF1-mediated SMD and SRD pathways [28].

2.4. UPF1 in Antiprion Systems

Prions are differed, infectious forms of native proteins. They were first discovered in sheep, where they cause fatal, transmissible encephalopathy named scrapie [76]. In the human infectious form of PrP, protein causes a neurodegenerative disorder called Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease and its variants by forming insoluble amyloid plaques [77]. Yeast possesses numerous variants of single-prion proteins [78], which, in their native form, function in nitrogen metabolism (Ure2), translation termination (Sup35) and provide better adaptation to environmental conditions by facilitating amyloid formation (Rnq1). The infectious forms created by those proteins are called (URE3), (PSI+) and (RNQ+), respectively [79][80]. Yeasts are an easy, cheap and safe model to study prions, creating a good alternative to animal models that sometimes can raise ethical questions. Parallelly, yeast has numerous antiprion systems, reducing amyloid formation and curing variants that do form prions. Son and Wickner discovered the link between Upf1 and (PSI+) levels with general screening for antiprion proteins. In the absence of either Upf1, Upf2 or Upf3, the generation of (PSI+) was elevated 10- to 15-fold. A direct interaction was proved, and the mechanism by which prions are cured was proposed. Upf1 monomers compete with the amyloid fibers of Sup35 or bind to the filament ends, preventing fiber growth [58]. NMD is conserved from yeasts to humans, and detailed analyses of the analogs of homologous systems can be applied to the treatment of neurodegenerative prion disorders in humans by enhancing native interactions [29][58]. Additionally, those studies suggest rather prion- or even variant-specific interactions of factors engaged in antiprion systems.

References

  1. Cheng, Z.; Muhlrad, D.; Lim, M.K.; Parker, R.; Song, H. Structural and functional insights into the human Upf1 helicase core. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 253–264.
  2. Chakrabarti, S.; Jayachandran, U.; Bonneau, F.; Fiorini, F.; Basquin, C.; Domcke, S.; Le Hir, H.; Conti, E. Molecular mechanisms for the RNA-dependent ATPase activity of Upf1 and its regulation by Upf2. Mol. Cell 2011, 41, 693–703.
  3. Feng, Q.; Jagannathan, S.; Bradley, R.K. The RNA Surveillance Factor UPF1 Represses Myogenesis via Its E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Activity. Mol. Cell 2017, 67, 239–251.
  4. Clerici, M.; Mourão, A.; Gutsche, I.; Gehring, N.H.; Hentze, M.W.; Kulozik, A.; Kadlec, J.; Sattler, M.; Cusack, S. Unusual bipartite mode of interaction between the nonsense-mediated decay factors, UPF1 and UPF2. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 2293–2306.
  5. Kadlec, J.; Guilligay, D.; Ravelli, R.B.; Cusack, S. Crystal structure of the UPF2-interacting domain of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay factor UPF1. RNA 2006, 12, 1817–1824.
  6. Ivanov, P.V.; Gehring, N.H.; Kunz, J.B.; Hentze, M.W.; Kulozik, A.E. Interactions between UPF1, eRFs, PABP and the exon junction complex suggest an integrated model for mammalian NMD pathways. EMBO J. 2008, 27, 736–747.
  7. Min, E.E.; Roy, B.; Amrani, N.; He, F.; Jacobson, A. Yeast Upf1 CH domain interacts with Rps26 of the 40S ribosomal subunit. RNA 2013, 19, 1105–1115.
  8. Takahashi, S.; Araki, Y.; Ohya, Y.; Sakuno, T.; Hoshino, S.-I.; Kontani, K.; Nishina, H.; Katada, T. Upf1 potentially serves as a RING-related E3 ubiquitin ligase via its association with Upf3 in yeast. RNA 2008, 14, 1950–1958.
  9. Kashima, I.; Yamashita, A.; Izumi, N.; Kataoka, N.; Morishita, R.; Hoshino, S.; Ohno, M.; Dreyfuss, G.; Ohno, S. Binding of a novel SMG-1–Upf1–eRF1–eRF3 complex (SURF) to the exon junction complex triggers Upf1 phosphorylation and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 355–367.
  10. Yamashita, A.; Ohnishi, T.; Kashima, I.; Taya, Y.; Ohno, S. Human SMG-1, a novel phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related protein kinase, associates with components of the mRNA surveillance complex and is involved in the regulation of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 2215–2228.
  11. Okada-Katsuhata, Y.; Yamashita, A.; Kutsuzawa, K.; Izumi, N.; Hirahara, F.; Ohno, S. N- and C-terminal Upf1 phosphorylations create binding platforms for SMG-6 and SMG-5:SMG-7 during NMD. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 1251–1266.
  12. Isken, O.; Kim, Y.K.; Hosoda, N.; Mayeur, G.L.; Hershey, J.W.B.; Maquat, L.E. Upf1 phosphorylation triggers translational repression during nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Cell 2008, 133, 314–327.
  13. Gehring, N.H.; Kunz, J.B.; Neu-Yilik, G.; Breit, S.; Viegas, M.H.; Hentze, M.W.; Kulozik, A.E. Exon-junction complex components specify distinct routes of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay with differential cofactor requirements. Mol. Cell 2005, 20, 65–75.
  14. Ohnishi, T.; Yamashita, A.; Kashima, I.; Schell, T.; Anders, K.R.; Grimson, A.; Hachiya, T.; Hentze, M.W.; Anderson, P.; Ohno, S. Phosphorylation of hUPF1 induces formation of mRNA surveillance complexes containing hSMG-5 and hSMG-7. Mol. Cell 2003, 12, 1187–1200.
  15. Melero, R.; Uchiyama, A.; Castaño, R.; Kataoka, N.; Kurosawa, H.; Ohno, S.; Yamashita, A.; Llorca, O. Structures of SMG1-UPFs complexes: SMG1 contributes to regulate UPF2-dependent activation of UPF1 in NMD. Structure 2014, 22, 1105–1119.
  16. Czaplinski, K.; Ruiz-Echevarria, M.J.; Paushkin, S.V.; Han, X.; Weng, Y.; Perlick, H.A.; Dietz, H.C.; Ter-Avanesyan, M.D.; Peltz, S.W. The surveillance complex interacts with the translation release factors to enhance termination and degrade aberrant mRNAs. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 1665–1677.
  17. Applequist, S.E.; Selg, M.; Raman, C.; Jäck, H.M. Cloning and characterization of HUPF1, a human homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae nonsense mRNA-reducing UPF1 protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 814–821.
  18. Leeds, P.; Wood, J.M.; Lee, B.S.; Culbertson, M.R. Gene products that promote mRNA turnover in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992, 12, 2165–2177.
  19. Gowravaram, M.; Bonneau, F.; Kanaan, J.; Maciej, V.D.; Fiorini, F.; Raj, S.; Croquette, V.; Le Hir, H.; Chakrabarti, S. A conserved structural element in the RNA helicase UPF1 regulates its catalytic activity in an isoform-specific manner. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 2648–2659.
  20. Fritz, S.E.; Ranganathan, S.; Wang, C.D.; Hogg, J.R. An alternative UPF1 isoform drives conditional remodeling of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. EMBO J. 2022, 41, e108898.
  21. Weng, Y.; Czaplinski, K.; Peltz, S.W. Genetic and biochemical characterization of mutations in the ATPase and helicase regions of the Upf1 protein. Mol. Cell Biol. 1996, 16, 5477–5490.
  22. Bhattacharya, A.; Czaplinski, K.; Trifillis, P.; He, F.; Jacobson, A.; Peltz, S.W. Characterization of the biochemical properties of the human Upf1 gene product that is involved in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. RNA 2000, 6, 1226–1235.
  23. Czaplinski, K.; Weng, Y.; Hagan, K.W.; Peltz, S.W. Purification and characterization of the Upf1 protein: A factor involved in translation and mRNA degradation. RNA 1995, 1, 610–623.
  24. Fairman-Williams, M.E.; Guenther, U.-P.; Jankowsky, E. SF1 and SF2 helicases: Family matters. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2010, 20, 313–324.
  25. Chen, B.-L.; Wang, H.-M.; Lin, X.-S.; Zeng, Y.-M. UPF1: A potential biomarker in human cancers. Front. Biosci. 2021, 26, 76–84.
  26. Zaepfel, B.L.; Zhang, Z.; Maulding, K.; Coyne, A.N.; Cheng, W.; Hayes, L.R.; Lloyd, T.E.; Sun, S.; Rothstein, J.D. UPF1 reduces C9orf72 HRE-induced neurotoxicity in the absence of nonsense-mediated decay dysfunction. Cell Rep. 2021, 34, 108925.
  27. Kurosaki, T.; Imamachi, N.; Pröschel, C.; Mitsutomi, S.; Nagao, R.; Akimitsu, N.; Maquat, L.E. Loss of the fragile X syndrome protein FMRP results in misregulation of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Nat. Cell Biol. 2021, 23, 40–48.
  28. May, J.P.; Simon, A.E. Targeting of viral RNAs by Upf1-mediated RNA decay pathways. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2021, 47, 1–8.
  29. Wickner, R.B.; Edskes, H.K.; Son, M.; Wu, S.; Niznikiewicz, M. Innate immunity to prions: Anti-prion systems turn a tsunami of prions into a slow drip. Curr. Genet. 2021, 67, 833–847.
  30. Elbarbary, R.A.; Miyoshi, K.; Hedaya, O.; Myers, J.R.; Maquat, L.E. UPF1 helicase promotes TSN-mediated miRNA decay. Genes Dev. 2017, 31, 1483–1493.
  31. Liu, S.; Chen, W.; Hu, H.; Zhang, T.; Wu, T.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Kong, Q.; Lu, H.; Lu, Z. Long noncoding RNA PVT1 promotes breast cancer proliferation and metastasis by binding miR-128-3p and UPF1. Breast Cancer Res. 2021, 23, 115.
  32. Zhu, C.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, S.; Dai, W.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, H.; Sheng, W.; Xu, Y. UPF1 promotes chemoresistance to oxaliplatin through regulation of TOP2A activity and maintenance of stemness in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 519.
  33. Chen, B.; Wang, H.; Li, D.; Lin, X.; Ma, Z.; Zeng, Y. Up-frameshift Protein 1 Promotes Tumor Progression by Regulating Apoptosis and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Colorectal Cancer. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2021, 20, 15330338211064438.
  34. Wang, X.; Lai, Q.; He, J.; Li, Q.; Ding, J.; Lan, Z.; Gu, C.; Yan, Q.; Fang, Y.; Zhao, X.; et al. LncRNA SNHG6 promotes proliferation, invasion and migration in colorectal cancer cells by activating TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway via targeting UPF1 and inducing EMT via regulation of ZEB1. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 16, 51–59.
  35. Bokhari, A.; Jonchere, V.; Lagrange, A.; Bertrand, R.; Svrcek, M.; Marisa, L.; Buhard, O.; Greene, M.; Demidova, A.; Jia, J.; et al. Targeting nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability. Oncogenesis 2018, 7, 70.
  36. Chen, H.; Ma, J.; Kong, F.; Song, N.; Wang, C.; Ma, X. UPF1 contributes to the maintenance of endometrial cancer stem cell phenotype by stabilizing LINC00963. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 257.
  37. Li, L.; Geng, Y.; Feng, R.; Zhu, Q.; Miao, B.; Cao, J.; Fei, S. The Human RNA Surveillance Factor UPF1 Modulates Gastric Cancer Progression by Targeting Long Non-Coding RNA MALAT1. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 42, 2194–2206.
  38. Xu, J.; Zhang, G.; Hu, J.; Li, H.; Zhao, J.; Zong, S.; Guo, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Jing, Z. UPF1/circRPPH1/ATF3 feedback loop promotes the malignant phenotype and stemness of GSCs. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 645.
  39. Lv, Z.-H.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Li, Z.-Y. LncRNA PVT1 aggravates the progression of glioma via downregulating UPF1. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 8956–8963.
  40. Chang, L.; Yuan, Y.; Li, C.; Guo, T.; Qi, H.; Xiao, Y.; Dong, X.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Q. Upregulation of SNHG6 regulates ZEB1 expression by competitively binding miR-101-3p and interacting with UPF1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2016, 383, 183–194.
  41. Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, N.; Li, X.; Zheng, J.; Ge, L. UPF1 inhibits the hepatocellular carcinoma progression by targeting long non-coding RNA UCA1. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6652.
  42. Chang, L.; Li, C.; Guo, T.; Wang, H.; Ma, W.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, Q.; Ye, Q.; Liu, Z. The human RNA surveillance factor UPF1 regulates tumorigenesis by targeting Smad7 in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 35, 8.
  43. Lu, J.; Plank, T.-D.; Su, F.; Shi, X.; Liu, C.; Ji, Y.; Li, S.; Huynh, A.; Shi, C.; Zhu, B.; et al. The nonsense-mediated RNA decay pathway is disrupted in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 3058–3062.
  44. Oka, M.; Xu, L.; Suzuki, T.; Yoshikawa, T.; Sakamoto, H.; Uemura, H.; Yoshizawa, A.C.; Suzuki, Y.; Nakatsura, T.; Ishihama, Y.; et al. Aberrant splicing isoforms detected by full-length transcriptome sequencing as transcripts of potential neoantigens in non-small cell lung cancer. Genome Biol. 2021, 22, 9.
  45. Han, S.; Cao, D.; Sha, J.; Zhu, X.; Chen, D. LncRNA ZFPM2-AS1 promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression by interacting with UPF1 to destabilize ZFPM2. Mol. Oncol. 2020, 14, 1074–1088.
  46. Cao, L.; Qi, L.; Zhang, L.; Song, W.; Yu, Y.; Xu, C.; Li, L.; Guo, Y.; Yang, L.; Liu, C.; et al. Human nonsense-mediated RNA decay regulates EMT by targeting the TGF-ß signaling pathway in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2017, 403, 246–259.
  47. Pei, C.-L.; Fei, K.-L.; Yuan, X.-Y.; Gong, X.-J. LncRNA DANCR aggravates the progression of ovarian cancer by downregulating UPF1. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 10657–10663.
  48. Liu, C.; Karam, R.; Zhou, Y.; Su, F.; Ji, Y.; Li, G.; Xu, G.; Lu, L.; Wang, C.; Song, M.; et al. The UPF1 RNA surveillance gene is commonly mutated in pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 596–598.
  49. Hu, J.; Wang, Z.; Yang, S.; Lu, Y.; Li, G. The edited UPF1 is correlated with elevated asparagine synthetase in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 3713–3720.
  50. Yang, C.; Ströbel, P.; Marx, A.; Hofmann, I. Plakophilin-associated RNA-binding proteins in prostate cancer and their implications in tumor progression and metastasis. Virchows Arch. 2013, 463, 379–390.
  51. DeJesus-Hernandez, M.; Mackenzie, I.R.; Boeve, B.F.; Boxer, A.L.; Baker, M.; Rutherford, N.J.; Nicholson, A.M.; Finch, N.A.; Flynn, H.; Adamson, J.; et al. Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 2011, 72, 245–256.
  52. Renton, A.E.; Majounie, E.; Waite, A.; Simón-Sánchez, J.; Rollinson, S.; Gibbs, J.R.; Schymick, J.C.; Laaksovirta, H.; van Swieten, J.C.; Myllykangas, L.; et al. A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD. Neuron 2011, 72, 257–268.
  53. Bai, J.; Qu, Y.; Cao, Y.; Yang, L.; Ge, L.; Jin, Y.; Wang, H.; Song, F. The SMN1 common variant c.22 dupA in Chinese patients causes spinal muscular atrophy by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in humans. Gene 2018, 644, 49–55.
  54. Zhang, M.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lan, F.; Zeng, J. Premature termination codons in SMN1 leading to spinal muscular atrophy trigger nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Clin. Chim. Acta 2022, 530, 45–49.
  55. Mooney, C.M.; Jimenez-Mateos, E.M.; Engel, T.; Mooney, C.; Diviney, M.; Venø, M.T.; Kjems, J.; Farrell, M.A.; O’Brien, D.F.; Delanty, N.; et al. RNA sequencing of synaptic and cytoplasmic Upf1-bound transcripts supports contribution of nonsense-mediated decay to epileptogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41517.
  56. Fang, J.; Pietzsch, C.; Tsaprailis, G.; Crynen, G.; Cho, K.F.; Ting, A.Y.; Bukreyev, A.; de la Torre, J.C.; Saphire, E.O. Functional interactomes of the Ebola virus polymerase identified by proximity proteomics in the context of viral replication. Cell Rep. 2022, 38, 110544.
  57. Serquiña, A.K.P.; Das, S.R.; Popova, E.; Ojelabi, O.A.; Roy, C.K.; Göttlinger, H.G. UPF1 is crucial for the infectivity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 progeny virions. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 8853–8861.
  58. Son, M.; Wickner, R.B. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay factors cure most prion variants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E1184–E1193.
  59. Chen, S.; Petricca, J.; Ye, W.; Guan, J.; Zeng, Y.; Cheng, N.; Gong, L.; Shen, S.Y.; Hua, J.T.; Crumbaker, M.; et al. The cell-free DNA methylome captures distinctions between localized and metastatic prostate tumors. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6467.
  60. Baldi, S.; He, Y.; Ivanov, I.; Khamgan, H.; Safi, M.; Alradhi, M.; Shopit, A.; Al-Danakh, A.; Al-Nusaif, M.; Gao, Y.; et al. Aberrantly hypermethylated ARID1B is a novel biomarker and potential therapeutic target of colon adenocarcinoma. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 914354.
  61. Suzuki, A.; Makinoshima, H.; Wakaguri, H.; Esumi, H.; Sugano, S.; Kohno, T.; Tsuchihara, K.; Suzuki, Y. Aberrant transcriptional regulations in cancers: Genome, transcriptome and epigenome analysis of lung adenocarcinoma cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 13557–13572.
  62. Yamauchi, H.; Nishimura, K.; Yoshimi, A. Aberrant RNA splicing and therapeutic opportunities in cancers. Cancer Sci. 2022, 113, 373–381.
  63. Luo, T.; Cui, S.; Bian, C.; Yu, X. Crosstalk between TGF-β/Smad3 and BMP/BMPR2 signaling pathways via miR-17-92 cluster in carotid artery restenosis. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2014, 389, 169–176.
  64. Tripathi, V.; Sixt, K.M.; Gao, S.; Xu, X.; Huang, J.; Weigert, R.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, Y.E. Direct regulation of alternative splicing by SMAD3 through PCBP1 is essential to the tumor-promoting role of TGF-β. Mol. Cell 2016, 64, 1010.
  65. Kaowinn, S.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.; Shin, D.H.; Kang, C.-D.; Kim, D.-K.; Lee, S.; Kang, M.K.; Koh, S.S.; Kim, S.J.; et al. Cancer upregulated gene 2 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition of human lung cancer cells via TGF-β signaling. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 5092–5110.
  66. Chen, T.; Sun, Y.; Ji, P.; Kopetz, S.; Zhang, W. Topoisomerase IIα in chromosome instability and personalized cancer therapy. Oncogene 2015, 34, 4019–4031.
  67. Zhao, Y.; Brickner, J.R.; Majid, M.C.; Mosammaparast, N. Crosstalk between ubiquitin and other post-translational modifications on chromatin during double-strand break repair. Trends Cell Biol. 2014, 24, 426–434.
  68. Pierouli, K.; Papakonstantinou, E.; Papageorgiou, L.; Diakou, I.; Mitsis, T.; Dragoumani, K.; Spandidos, D.A.; Bacopoulou, F.; Chrousos, G.P.; Goulielmos, G.Ν.; et al. Long non-coding RNAs and microRNAs as regulators of stress in cancer (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2022, 26, 361.
  69. Li, Y.; Guo, D.; Ren, M.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lu, G.; He, S. Long non-coding RNA SNAI3-AS1 promotes the proliferation and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating the UPF1/Smad7 signalling pathway. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 6271–6282.
  70. Qiao, Y.; Jiang, X.; Lee, S.T.; Karuturi, R.K.M.; Hooi, S.C.; Yu, Q. FOXQ1 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human cancers. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 3076–3086.
  71. Richter, J.D.; Bassell, G.J.; Klann, E. Dysregulation and restoration of translational homeostasis in fragile X syndrome. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015, 16, 595–605.
  72. Hagerman, R.J.; Berry-Kravis, E.; Hazlett, H.C.; Bailey, D.B., Jr.; Moine, H.; Kooy, R.F.; Tassone, F.; Gantois, I.; Sonenberg, N.; Mandel, J.L.; et al. Fragile X syndrome. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2017, 3, 17065.
  73. Bhuvanagiri, M.; Schlitter, A.M.; Hentze, M.W.; Kulozik, A.E. NMD: RNA biology meets human genetic medicine. Biochem. J. 2010, 430, 365–377.
  74. Alsharafi, W.A.; Xiao, B.; Abuhamed, M.M.; Bi, F.-F.; Luo, Z.-H. Correlation Between IL-10 and microRNA-187 Expression in Epileptic Rat Hippocampus and Patients with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 466.
  75. Martin, L.; Grigoryan, A.; Wang, D.; Wang, J.; Breda, L.; Rivella, S.; Cardozo, T.; Gardner, L.B. Identification and characterization of small molecules that inhibit nonsense-mediated RNA decay and suppress nonsense p53 mutations. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 3104–3113.
  76. Alper, T.; Haig, D.A.; Clarke, M.C. The exceptionally small size of the scrapie agent. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1966, 22, 278–284.
  77. Appleby, B.S.; Shetty, S.; Elkasaby, M. Genetic aspects of human prion diseases. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 1003056.
  78. Vorberg, I.M. All the Same? The Secret Life of Prion Strains within Their Target Cells. Viruses 2019, 11, 334.
  79. Oamen, H.P.; Lau, Y.; Caudron, F. Prion-like proteins as epigenetic devices of stress adaptation. Exp. Cell Res. 2020, 396, 112262.
  80. Kushnirov, V.V.; Dergalev, A.A.; Alieva, M.K.; Alexandrov, A.I. Structural Bases of Prion Variation in Yeast. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5738.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Genetics & Heredity
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Jacek Staszewski
,
Natalia Lazarewicz
,
Julia Konczak
,
Iwona Migdal
,
Ewa Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska
View Times: 341
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 18 May 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback