1. Microorganism
Syngas fermentation for the production of biochemicals or biofuels predominantly involves autotrophic acetogens using the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway (WLP), also known as the reductive acetyl-coenzyme A (Acetyl-CoA) pathway
[1]. Acetogens use C1 gases (CO and/or CO
2) as electron acceptors, and CO and/or H
2 as the electron donor for the reduction of CO
2 into acetyl-CoA as an intermediate product for producing alcohols and various organic acids, including acetate. The acetate yield obtained during this fermentation is highly dependent on the type of microorganism used
[2]. Thus, selecting the right microorganism is essential for obtaining high acetate yield and productivity.
1.1. Grow in Axenic Culture
The syngas fermentation by axenic culture can create reproducible data
[3], and the process is also more easily controllable than mixed culture because a single type of microorganism in the axenic culture has consistent nutrient requirements, growth rate and other physiological characteristics of the cell
[4]. Laboratory-scale research on syngas-to-acetate fermentation has, therefore, often used pure cultures. The fermentation by pure culture could use mesophilic or thermophilic bacteria. The classification of the different acetogens, along with their optimum growth conditions and by-products produced besides acetate, are shown in
Table 1.
Table 1. Carboxydotrophic microorganisms.
Compared to thermophilic autotrophic bacteria, more mesophilic autotrophic bacteria have been isolated and further studied for their performance during the fermentation of C1 gases (CO and CO2) into various biochemical products (Table 1). The advantages of mesophilic acetogens for syngas-to-acetate fermentation over thermophilic acetogens are lower energy consumption for process heating and more genetic tools available for the genetic engineering of these strains. Most mesophilic acetogens described can both live autotrophically using inorganic compounds such as CO2 or CO as the carbon source or live heterotrophically on organic compounds such as Clostridium ljungdahlii, C. carboxidivorans, C. ragsdalei, C. autoethanogenum, C. drakei, Alkalibaculum bacchii, Butyribacterium methylotrophicum, and Oxobacter pfennigii. The products produced are either ethanol, butyrate, butanol, lactate, or 2,3-butanediol apart from acetate. For instance, C. carboxidivorans, shown in Figure 1, accumulated butyrate, butanol, and ethanol and then released these products outside the cell. The stoichiometric reaction and Gibbs free energy related to the production of these products can be seen in Table 2. As a consequence of the production of other products besides acetate, the yield of acetate will decline.
Figure 1. Wood–Ljungdahl Pathway of
C. carboxidivorans using C1 gases (CO and CO
2)
[8].
Table 2. The potential reaction of acetic acid, ethanol, butyric acid, butanol, hexanoic acid, and hexanol
[27][28].
A batch fermentation test of
C. carboxidivorans using 2.2 atm CO gas maximally yielded 1.87 g/L acetate and formed several by-products such as butyrate (0.23 g/L), caproate (0.09 g/L), ethanol (0.19 g/L) and butanol (0.075 g/L)
[29]. Meanwhile, batch fermentation by
C. ljungdahlii maximally generated 2 g/L acetate using 2.0 H
2/CO ratio, 0.35 g/L ethanol, and 0.5 g/L 2,3-butanediol using 0.5 H
2/CO ratio
[30]. The other mesophilic syngas bacteria, such as
C. ragsdalei,
C. autoethanogenum,
C. drakei,
A. bacchii,
B. methylotrophicum, and
O. pfennigii maximally produced acetate up to 12.3 g/L
[31], 5.33 g/L
[32], 0.5 g/L
[33], 1.2 g/L
[34], 1.3 g/L
[35], and 0.16 g/L
[36], respectively.
On the other hand, several mesophilic bacteria are categorized as autotrophic homoacetogens, such as
C. aceticum,
A. woodii,
P. productus, and
E. limosum, solely producing acetate with a maximum concentration of 7.2 g/L
[37], 3.17 g/L
[38], 3.2 g/L
[39], and 0.5 g/L
[40], respectively. These strains are, therefore, of special interest for large-scale acetate production.
In addition to acetogenic bacteria, methanogenic archaea have also been investigated for acetate production besides methane, formate, and methylated thiols from C1 gases.
Methanosarcina acetivorans is, until now, the only acetate-producing archaea successfully identified, and the concentration of acetate produced was low (0.06 g/L)
[41]. Rother
[25] reported that acetate and formate are the primary metabolites of these archaea over methane. Acetate might, therefore, be produced by the multienzyme complex of CO dehydrogenase (CODH)/acetyl coenzyme A synthase (ACS), converting CO and CO
2 into acetyl-CoA, an intermediate product for acetate formation and other metabolites
[23]. The CO dissolved in the fermentation broth is oxidized to form CO
2, and then the electron released from this oxidation step is used for CO
2-to-a methyl group reduction and ultimately towards acetate synthesis
[24].
Thermophilic microorganisms for syngas fermentation have recently attracted increased attention due to the higher growth rate of thermophiles compared to mesophiles. Furthermore, higher temperatures minimize the risk of contamination
[42]. The thermophilic bacteria that have been reported to have the capability of syngas-to-acetate production include
M. thermoacetica, previously known as
Clostridium thermoaceticum, as well as
Desulfotomaculum kuznetsovii.
The thermophilic homoacetogen of
M. thermoacetica is classified as a gram-positive bacterium that can utilize both CO and CO
2 to produce acetate
[43][44]. Furthermore, unlike most mesophilic microorganisms that generate higher alcohols, acetate is the only product from syngas fermentation by
M. thermoacetica [45]. This thermophilic bacterium was able to grow in various syngas blend compositions such as H
2/CO
2, 100% CO, and CO/CO
2 fermentation
[46], and the results of all these experiments showed that acetate could be produced (
Table 3). For instance, Kerby and Zeikus reported that
C. thermoacetium deposited by Fontaine et al. (currently named
M. thermoacetica DSM 2955
T or ATCC 35608) rapidly grew on H
2/CO
2 and needed adaptation to grow on CO
[47]. This bacterium strain stoichiometrically required 4.44 mol H
2 and 2.33 mol CO
2 to produce 1 mol acetate or 3.64 mol CO to produce 1 mol acetate. Another strain (
M. thermoacetica DSM 521
T) can further oxidize CO to CO
2, followed by CO
2 reduction to acetate
[8][48]. A mutant strain of
M. thermoacetica (currently deposited as
M. thermoacetica ATCC 49707 and DSM 6867) derived from
Clostridium thermoaceticum ATCC 39289 has been described
[49]. This
Moorella thermoacetica strain generated up to 31 g/L acetic acid on 70% CO/30% CO
2 at pH 6.0 in a bubble column bioreactor, a higher concentration as found with 40% CO/30% H
2/30% CO
2 fermentation of 26 g/L
[50]. Genetic modification of
M. thermoacetica is eased by the fact that the genome of this strain has been fully sequenced, as reported for
M. thermoacetica DSM 521
T [51] and DSM 2955
T [51]. Hence, this bacterium is a good candidate for acetate production from syngas.
Another species of
Moorella formerly named
Clostridium thermoautotrophicum JW701/3 (
M. thermoautotrophica ATCC 33924 and DSM 1974) isolated by Wiegel et al. could utilize CO
2/H
2 or CO for cell and acetate production
[52]. Furthermore, Savage et al. reported that faster CO-dependent growth of this species of
Moorella was reached by supplementing CO
2 into the headspace
[46]. However,
M. thermoautotrophica is currently proposed to be on the list of rejected names because, based on phylogenetic and genomic analysis,
M. thermoautotrophica and
M. thermoacetica are closely related and show genetic similarities at the species level
[53][54].
Table 3. Comparison of acetate production by several strains of M thermoacetica, their syngas fermentation conditions, and bioreactor type.
Other potential thermophilic bacteria are
D. kuznetsovii and
D. thermobenzoicum subsp.
thermosyntrophicum, capable of growing autotrophically on mixtures of gases of H
2/CO
2 [57][58]. Both bacteria can further reduce sulfate (SO
4−)/sulfite (SO
3) while utilizing CO and H
2 as the electron donor to generate H
2S
[9]. Moreover, besides H
2S, acetate will be produced up to 0.4 g/L for
D. thermobenzoicum subsp.
thermosyntrophicum and 0.44 g/L for
D. kuznetsovii using CO. Hence, the use of this microorganism brings about two functions: acetate production as well as the removal of SO
4−.
Archaea such as
Archaeoglobus fulgidus have also been reported to use CO, apart from CO
2, as the carbon source for growth
[59]. The presence of CO led to accumulation of CO
2, acetate (18 mM), and formate (8.2 mM), while no H
2 was detected. Another study also revealed that strains of this archaea genus effectively reduce SO
4− with CO as an electron donor
[60] but have less need for the sulfurous compound for growth
[59].
1.2. Mixed Culture
Anaerobic fermentation by mixed cultures has further shown to be effective in producing acetate with high yields. Singla
[61] mentioned that using mixed cultures has several benefits, such as no need for sterilization, more adaptive microorganisms that works synergistically together due to the microbial diversity along with the capability to utilize mixed substrates with lower operation costs, and long-term stability of growth. In addition, mixed cultures were found to tolerate higher variations in the syngas composition compared to pure cultures, where consistency often is a must
[4]. Furthermore, acetate yields of up to 42 g/L have been reported by Wang
[62] during mixed culture fermentation.
Syngas fermentation for acetate production by mixed cultures has been tested with both mesophilic and thermophilic inocula (
Table 4)
[63]. Wang reported that syngas fermentation with an inoculum containing thermophilic bacteria dominated by the genera
Thermoanaerobacterium and
Thermohydrogenium effectively produced acetate in both batch and continuous culture
[62]. Similar studies were done with a mesophilic inoculum dominated by strains belonging to the
Clostridium genus at temperatures from 35 to 37 °C
[19][64][65][66]. Even though methanogens generally outcompete acetogens on CO
2 and H
2 under both mesophilic and thermophilic conditions, adjustment of the fermentation temperature and/or pH, or the addition of 2-Bromoethane sulfonic acid (BES) during start-up can inhibit the activity of methanogens and make acetogens prevail over methanogens
[67].
Table 4. Acetate production from syngas by mixed culture inoculum.
2. C1 Metabolism by Acetogens
Homoacetogens are acetogens who can live solely metabolizing syngas (CO, CO
2, and H
2) through two branches of the Wood–Ljungdahl Pathway: the eastern or western branch to form acetyl-CoA as an intermediate ending as acetate (
Figure 1). Furthermore, other products such as volatile fatty acids (butyrate and hexanoate), alcohol (ethanol, 2,3-butanediol, butanol, hexanol), and lactate can be produced. In general, one molecule of CO
2 is reduced by six electrons with 1 ATP to form methyl tetrahydrofolate (CH
3-THF) in the eastern branch, whereas the C1 substrate is directly converted into acetyl-CoA using 2 electrons in the western branch
[68]. The acetyl-CoA formed is then converted to acetate while releasing ATP by substrate-level phosphorylation (SLP). The electron used during Wood–Ljungdahl Pathway comes from CO and H
2 oxidation, whereas CO
2 and CO serve as carbon sources.
2.1. CO Metabolism
Carbon monoxide (CO), a major gas generated from gasification, is generally a toxic gas for most microorganisms because this gas has a high affinity for metal-containing enzymes, causing the inactivation of these enzymes. However, some bacteria have high resistance to CO and are named carboxydotrophic acetogens (see
Table 1). These microbes are capable of CO oxidation to generate electrons and provide reducing equivalents catalyzed by carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (CODH) while transferring the formed electron to Ferredoxin (Fd) or other electron acceptors
[69].
In carboxydotrophic acetogen metabolism, CO can act as both a carbon source and an electron source. Meanwhile, H
2 only serves as an electron donor and requires a carbon source obtained from CO and/or CO
2 [70]. The electrons or reducing equivalents are generated from biological water gas shift reaction (BWGSR) of CO (see Equation (1)) or hydrogen oxidation (see Equation (2)) that will further be used for CO
2 reduction through the eastern and western branches of Wood–Ljungdahl Pathway
[27]. When fermentation is performed in the absence of H
2, only half of the carbon in CO is transformed into acetic acid, whereas the remaining carbon of CO is converted into CO
2 (see Equation (3)). On the other hand, when H
2 is available in the fermentation media, two mol CO
2 is required to form one mol acetic acid
[71] (see Equation (4)). Such CO
2 is obtained from CO oxidation or supplying CO
2 gas into the fermentation system.
CO-to-acetic acid conversion through Wood–Ljungdahl Pathway is catalyzed by oxidoreductase enzymes. For instance, the enzyme that plays an essential role in CO metabolism to acetate is carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (CODH). According to its role in the metabolic pathway, CODH is classified into a monofunctional CODH and a bifunctional CODH/acetyl CoA synthase (ACS). Monofunctional CODH plays a role in catalyzing reversible CO-to-CO
2 oxidation, while bifunctional CODH, together with ACS, is involved in the reaction of CO, methyl-CoFeSP, and CoASH to form acetyl CoA
[72][73]. The methyl-CoFeSP is formed by transferring the methyl group generated from the eastern branch of Wood–Ljungdahl Pathway to corrinoid/iron-sulfur protein (CoFeSP) catalyzed by a methyltransferase (MeTr); the mechanism can be seen in
Figure 1. The catalytic reactions of both monofunctional CODH and bifunctional CODH/ACS are shown in Equations (11) and (12) of
Table 5, respectively.
Table 5. Detailed metabolic reactions of Wood–Ljungdahl Pathway (WLP).
The enzymatic reaction mechanism of CODH was proposed by Can
[74] as a ping-pong reaction. The metal center (Ni for most of the acetogens including
M. thermoacetica) of CODH C
red1 in the C-cluster bind CO by releasing one H
+ and forming C
red1-CO
2, then reacting with H
2O by releasing another H
+ and CO
2 to form C
red2. The electron produced is then transferred to ferredoxin to re-form C
red1, as shown in
Figure 2.
Figure 2. The ping pong reaction of CODH
[74].
Some studies have successfully purified and characterized both enzymes from anaerobic carboxydotrophic acetogens and attempted to describe the structure
[75]. The CODH in anaerobic acetogens is structured by a complex metal center consisting of nickel (Ni), iron (Fe), and sulfur (S), serving as CO and H
2O reaction center, intermediary metal-carboxylate stabilization, and temporary storage of two electrons from the reaction
[76]. On the other hand, aerobic carboxydotrophic bacteria employ Cu, Mo, and Fe-containing flavoenzymes
[73]. Doukov
[77] described the biofunctional CODH/ACS. In
M. thermoacetica, this is composed of iron (Fe), sulfur (S), copper (Co), and nickel (Ni) metallocofactor. Another study mentioned that the active site of both enzymes, the C-cluster and A-cluster for CODH and ACS, respectively, has a [Fe
4S
4] cluster connected to Ni
[75].
2.2. CO2 Metabolism
Chemolithoautotrophic acetogens utilize inorganic carbon (CO
2) as the carbon source for product and cell formation through the eastern and western branches of WLP
[1]. In the western branch, the conversion of CO
2 into acetate involves several enzymes and proteins that are successfully identified: (1) CODH, (2) CODH/ACS, (3) corrinoid iron-sulfur protein (CoFeSP), two subunits, (4) MeTr, whereas the enzymes in eastern branch involve: (1) FDH, (2) FTS, (3) MTC, (4) MTD, and (5) MTR
[72][73]. According to
Figure 1, when acetogens grow with CO
2 and H
2 without CO in the fermentation media, CODH catalyzes the reduction of CO
2 into CO in the western or carbonyl branch using the reducing equivalents produced from hydrogen oxidation. Meanwhile, CO
2 is further reduced to form formate in the eastern branch. The formate formed in the last reaction is a precursor of the methyl groups of acetyl Co-A.
In the eastern branch, the formate formed from a two-electron reduction of CO
2 is condensed with THF, involving ATP to form formyl-THF
[1]. The formed formyl-THF subsequently undergoes cyclization to methenyl-THF catalyzed by MTC. Consecutive reduction then occurs of methenyl-THF to form methylene-THF, followed by methylene-THF to form methyl-THF. The CH
3-THF is then transferred to the cobalt center of CoFeSP for CH
3-CoFeSP formation. Together with CO, CH
3-CoFeSP undergoes condensation to produce acetyl-CoA, then further reaction to form acetate. Finally, the formation of acetate is catalyzed by two enzymes, PTA and ACK, by generation ATP
[5]. The detailed metabolic pathway and biochemical reaction of CO
2 can be seen in
Figure 1 and
Table 5, respectively.