Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1
Marc Fakhoury
 -- 5351 2023-04-14 16:10:11 |
2 format correct
Jessie Wu
 Meta information modification 5351 2023-04-17 05:17:49 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?
No, upload directly Yes

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Fritz, M.; Soravia, S.; Dudeck, M.; Malli, L.; Fakhoury, M. Neurobiology of Aggression. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43068 (accessed on 21 December 2024).
Fritz M, Soravia S, Dudeck M, Malli L, Fakhoury M. Neurobiology of Aggression. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43068. Accessed December 21, 2024.
Fritz, Michael, Sarah-Maria Soravia, Manuela Dudeck, Layal Malli, Marc Fakhoury. "Neurobiology of Aggression" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43068 (accessed December 21, 2024).
Fritz, M., Soravia, S., Dudeck, M., Malli, L., & Fakhoury, M. (2023, April 14). Neurobiology of Aggression. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/43068
Fritz, Michael, et al. "Neurobiology of Aggression." Encyclopedia. Web. 14 April, 2023.
Neurobiology of Aggression
Edit
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/biology12030469

Aggression can be conceptualized as any behavior, physical or verbal, that involves attacking another person or animal with the intent of causing harm, pain or injury. Because of its high prevalence worldwide, aggression has remained a central clinical and public safety issue. Aggression can be caused by several risk factors, including biological and psychological, such as genetics and mental health disorders, and socioeconomic such as education, employment, financial status, and neighborhood. Research over the past few decades has also proposed a link between alcohol consumption and aggressive behaviors. Alcohol consumption can escalate aggressive behavior in humans, often leading to domestic violence or serious crimes. Converging lines of evidence have also shown that trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) could have a tremendous impact on behavior associated with both alcohol use problems and violence. 

aggression neurobiology genes receptors

1. The Neuroanatomy of Aggression

1.1. Frontal Cortical Structures

Where to start? Principally, where most neuroscientific research concerning behavior and decision-making starts—the cortex. Cortical structures are fundamentally associated with aggression; amongst those, structural and functional deviations in the prefrontal and medial temporal regions have been extensively investigated and meta-analyzed [1][2]. For instance, the ability to control aggression was linked to the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in both rodents and human beings. Volumetric and neuronal activity alterations were found to correlate with social misconduct and callousness in adolescents [3][4] as well as with aggression in mice [5]. Additionally, van Heukelum and colleagues [5] aimed to provide a link between ACC activation and the suppression of pathological aggression. The study applied a chemogenetic approach to activate the ACC and consequently repressed pathological aggression almost completely in mice.
Furthermore, sub-cortically both prefrontal and temporal abnormal white matter integrity was reported in 15 male convicted rapists compared to controls [6]. In light of these findings, interventions targeting prefrontal areas seemed to be expedient. To date, four studies applied transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to prefrontal areas attempting to modulate aggression and aiding a causality understanding. However, the results were mixed. Stimulating the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) reduced proactive aggression [7], whereas stimulating the left dlPFC triggered the opposite effect if participants were already in a negative affective state [8]. On the other hand, stimulating the inferior prefrontal cortex yielded no result at all [9]. Still, bilaterally stimulating the dlPFC caused participants to view aggression and sexual violence as more morally despicable and decreased the intentions of committing aggression [10]. Conversely, lesions to the dlPFC promoted physical aggressiveness, as demonstrated in a study with Vietnam War veterans who received penetrating brain injuries [11].
A different mean of stimulation, continuous Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS), further cooperated an involvement of dlPFC activity in aggression. Interestingly, inhibiting the left dlPFC caused healthy volunteers to act reactively and proactively more aggressively, contradicting the findings described above [12]. An activating cTBS protocol across both hemispherical dlPFCs, however, led to an increased accuracy in of identifying emotions and reduced likelihood of aggression in participants with an antisocial personality disorder [13].
The work of Chester and colleagues [14][15][16] implicated two additional parts of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in the complex matter of aggression; the ventromedial (vm) and the ventrolateral (vl) PFC. The vmPFC showed volumetric and gray matter deficits in the context of heightened aggression, whereas augmented activation of the vlPFC during rejection could be linked to increased retaliating aggression. Additionally, an overall decreased gyrification of the frontal lobe, as well as prefrontal thinning, were related to intensified aggressive behavior in school children [17]. The involvement of these PFC areas in circuits of escalated aggression has been highlighted in rodents as well [18][19].
Finally, another subregion of the prefrontal cortex, the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), seems to play a role as well, especially given the famous case of Phineas Gage [20]. It does not surprise that across species, OFC abnormalities or chemogenetic inactivation are associated with increased aggression [21][22][23].

1.2. Temporal Cortical Structures

An initial report in a small population of highly violent criminals was the first to implicate metabolic abnormalities of lower medial temporal lobe structures in aggression [24]. Volumetric differences in adolescents with a conduct disorder diagnosis were then described by Kruesi and colleagues [25]. Next, a review of 17 imaging studies further strengthened the involvement of temporal structures in aggressive behaviors [26], with the recent work of Buadas-Rotger and colleagues [27] linking angry face reactivity in the superior temporal gyrus (STG) to task-related aggression. On a network level, this hyperreactivity was related to activation in the amygdala. Hence it is of no surprise that the neuro-moral theory of antisocial behavior emphasizes the involvement of the superior temporal gyrus, the angular gyrus, and the tempoparietal junction as key brain areas [28]. A recent meta-analysis of 2022 further confirmed this role of temporal lobe structures activities in aggression-prone individuals [29].

1.3. The Striatum

The striatum is a forebrain structure divided into a ventral and dorsal part, which is in humans further separated into the caudate and the putamen. Whereas the first receives strong dopaminergic inputs from the ventral tegmental area (VTA), the latter one is mostly innervated by the substantia nigra (dorsal part). The ventral part of the striatum is thought to facilitate learning, motivated behavior, and reward evaluation [30]. Unsurprisingly, imaging studies revealed functional abnormalities during increased retaliation-oriented aggression [15]. Additionally, violent offenders responded to provocations with high striatal reactivity [31]. Finally, increased volumes of the caudate, the putamen, and the nucleus accumbens (NAc; ventral striatum) were associated with augmented reactive aggression [32], while increased dorso-striatal activity measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) revealed a higher motivation to punish unfairness [33]. Interestingly, recently developed animal models demonstrated a “highly rewarding” aspect of aggression and violence to be mediated in dopaminoceptive D1-neurons in the NAc [34]. This “winner effect” describes the phenomenon that victorious mice are more likely to maintain successful aggressive behaviors [35], prefer the compartment associated with the victory [36], and respond in an operant conditioning paradigm with lever-pressing to encounter an intruder mouse to fight it [37].

1.4. The Limbic System

Hostility and anger combined in one outburst is called rage [38]; such rage is known to originate in the septum across species [39][40][41], a limbic structure in the epicenter of a vast neuronal aggression network connecting the amygdala, the VTA, and the hippocampus, and even extending to the PFC [42][43]. Modern neuroscientific circuitry studies based on optogenetics in mice revealed glutamatergic inputs from the CA2 region of the hippocampus and dopaminergic innervations from VTA to the septum to promote aggression [44][45]. On the other hand, overall inhibition and activation of the descending outputs from the lateral part of the septum (LS) to the hypothalamus were shown to modulate aggression bidirectionally. Inhibition of LS increased aggression through a GABAergic mechanism in rodents [46], whereas activation of the LS-to-hypothalamus connectivity reduced aggressive behavior [41], indicating an intricate sub-circuitry within the septum and its subdivisions.
Longstanding experimental evidence implicated hypothalamic structures in aggression and violence independent of species (for review, see [47]), even coining the term “hypothalamic attack area”, located at the ventrolateral pole of the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus (VMHvl; [48]). Single-unit electrophysiology and population optical recording demonstrated an increase in activity in the VMHvl immediately before the initiation of an attack [37]. Silencing this brain area abolished inter male aggression while activating it led to off-target attacks on inanimate objects and female mice [49]. Additionally, optogenetic stimulation of the prefrontal-cortical innervations to the more mediobasal and lateral parts of the hypothalamus was also found to be crucial for initiating violent bites in intermale aggression in mice [50].
In human beings, the “hypothalamic attack area” is suggested to be located in the more posteromedial part of the hypothalamus, also called the “Triangle of Sano” [51]. However, even though initial surgical interventions suggested promising results [52], deep brain stimulation of the posteromedial hypothalamus during pathological aggressiveness was of limited success [53][54][55][56].
Another brain area implicated in aggressiveness—and where our memories are formed—is the hippocampus. A recent chemogenetic approach, for instance, demonstrated ventral hippocampal control of stress-induced aggression in mice [57]. From a human perspective, a study with 67 participants suffering from intermittent explosive disorder (IED) revealed morphometric deformation in the hippocampus, which according to the authors, represented significant neuronal loss [58]. Along this line of thinking, the volumetric ratio between the hippocampus and amygdala has been implied in many psychopathologies, including heightened aggression [59]. On a functional level, Nikolic and colleagues [29] reported increased activity in both the left hippocampus and amygdala in individuals with a known history of violence during anger-eliciting tasks. Increased connectivity between the right hippocampus and the cingulate cortex could be associated with aggressive behavior of patients with a history of mild concussions [60].
The amygdala is a complex brain area that can be divided into a central and medial part on a microanatomical level. It plays a role in a multitude of cognitive functions like learning and memory. However, the amygdala is also implicated in several pathological conditions like anxiety disorder or addiction. Haller suggested in his review [61] that predatory aggression is especially mediated through the central part of the amygdala. In line with this thought, chemogenetic experiments identified a neuronal subtype in the posterodorsal-medial part of the amygdala controlling aggressive behavior in both male and female mice [62], while estrogen receptor-carrying neurons in the posterior amygdala signaling to the hypothalamus fulfilled the same role in inter-male aggression [63]. An optogenetic approach identified the posterior ventral segment of the medial part of the amygdala to be essential in primed aggressive behavior [64]. Here optogenetic high-frequency stimulation mimicked aggressive encounters and subsequently increased aggressive behavior in mice. Overall chemogenetic inhibition of the medial amygdala abolished lactating female-to-male mice aggression [65]. In human beings, amygdala reactivity to fearful facial expressions was linked to impulsive aggression [66], while children showing pronounced aggressive behavior had a decreased amygdala volume compared to controls [17]. In line with this observation, another study reported significant structural deformations of the amygdala in IED patients [58]. A longitudinal study with 503 participants running from first grade to the age of 26 provided further evidence of a link between decreased amygdala volume, violence, and even psychopathic traits [67]. Nonetheless, a recent study failed to link amygdala volumes to scores in the revised Psychopathy Check List (PCL-R; [68]). In contrast, a longitudinal observational study from Saxbe et al. [69] linked aggression and externalization running through family lines to a volumetric increase in the right amygdala. Fundamental work from Raine and colleagues [70] went even further and differentiated brain metabolic activity regarding proactive and impulsive aggression in convicted murderers. PET scans revealed that both groups had heightened metabolism in the right limbic system (i.e., amygdala, hippocampus, and midbrain), although being “excessively” augmented in predatory murderers. Accordingly, the work of da Cunha-Bang [31] reported increased amygdala reactivity to provocations in violent offenders. In another set of studies, Heesink et al. [71], Varkevisser et al. [72], and Ibrahim et al. [73] pointed out that the connectivity between the amygdala and PFC was decreased in war veterans as well as children with aggression issues. Conversely, Saxbe et al. [74] found such a decrease in connectivity to be restricted to the amygdala and the posterior cingulate cortex. On the other hand, resting-state fMRI revealed an overall increase in amygdala connectivity but pronounced severity in aggression was associated with a global reduction in connectivity in the vmPFC and dorsal ACC [75]. However, the trait “aggressiveness” did not relate to amygdala-OFC connectivity [76].
Finally, the VTA in itself and especially its primary dopaminergic cell population projecting to the LS were recently demonstrated to powerfully modulate aggression in rodents [77]. On a molecular level, dopamine 2 (D2)-receptors expressed on GABAergic neurons were identified as key players mediating such behavior [45]. Interestingly, winning “mice territorial disputes” was shown to prime VTA-to-NAc innervations, making the occurrence of aggression more likely [78]. Along with these types of observations, a recent study was able to link VTA hyper-reactivity to impulsive aggression and anti-sociality [79]. It is also worthwhile to note that Been and colleagues [80] underlined the VTA as a key node in the female rather than male circuitry of aggression.

1.5. The Parietal and Occipital Lobe

The precuneus, as part of the parietal lobe, is a brain area implied in a variety of complex functions and is part of the default mode network. Unsurprisingly, a recent meta-analysis of fMRI studies confirmed a significantly changed connectivity of the precuneus and frontal brain structures in aggression-prone individuals [29], as well as in juvenile violent offenders [81] and adolescents displaying disruptive behavior [82]. Additionally, increased neuronal reactivity to socio-emotional stimuli in the precuneus was linked to aggression [83][84].
The cuneus, a part of the occipital lobe, is a central part in the evaluation of threat. In line with this, work from Varkevisser and colleagues [72] and Heesink and colleagues [71] demonstrated increased connectivity between the ACC and the cuneus and its overall activation in impulsive-aggressive combat veterans. Interestingly, the recent work of Zhu and colleagues [85] reported a link between the cortical thickness of both the parietal and occipital lobes and overall aggressiveness in 240 participants. Finally, Nikolic and others [29] reported an overall reduced activity of the left occipital cortex in their recent meta-analysis of imaging studies in aggressive individuals.

2. The Neurotransmission and Genetics of Aggression

2.1. Serotonin, Dopamine and Their Degradation

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) plays an important role in higher cognitive functions as well as mood and is considered “the” most important neurotransmitter contributing to aggression [86]. It can act through 15 overall receptors divided into 7 families: 5-HT1 to 5-HT7. Of those, are all but 5-HT3, which is a ligand-gated sodium channel, are either excitatory or inhibitory G protein-coupled receptors [87].
The so-called “Serotonin deficiency” hypothesis dated to work from Linnoila and others [88], where 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), a serotonin metabolite, turned out to be significantly lower in the cerebrospinal fluid of violent offenders. Yet, despite that this inverse relation was repeatedly described as “strong” or “well established”, a recent meta-analysis of studies including more than 6500 participants demonstrated not more than a small, marginally significant effect [89].
Despite such a modest effect, modern neuroscientific tools keep pointing towards a serotonergic role in aggression. Since the discovery that the central nervous system has its own enzyme to synthesize serotonin (Tryptophan hydroxylase-2 (Tph-2); [90]), it was shown that a partial or complete knockdown led to more aggressive behavior in rodents [91][92][93][94] and could be linked to a diminished 5-HT1A receptor sensitivity [95]. On the other hand, highly aggressive wild-derived mice had higher mRNA levels of Tph-2 than other laboratory animals [96]. In human beings, functional polymorphisms like TPH2 G-703/T (G/G instead of G/T and TT) could be linked to anger-related traits in Korean women [97] and an anger-trait and negative OFC volume interaction [98], as well as changed in OFC serotonin synthesis in aggressive subjects [99]. Similarly, Laas and colleagues [100] found in Estonian adolescents the T/T variant carriers of the TPH2 G-703/T polymorphism show the least aggressiveness.
In line with Tph-2 knockdown results, the pharmacological depletion of serotonin itself also increased the attack duration in mice [101]. On a receptor level, altering serotonergic cell signaling either by genetic overexpression of the serotonin 1a receptor (5-HT1A receptor) in adult mice or pharmacological 5-HT1A receptor activation led to an immediate increase in aggressive behavior [102]. Conversely, systemic administration of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist 8-OH-DPAT inhibited social-isolation-enhanced aggression in mice [103]. Specific 5-HT1A receptor activation in the hypothalamus, on the contrary, had sex-dependent behavioral effects in hamsters. While female hamsters reacted aggressively, male hamsters reduced their aggressiveness [104]. Further complicating the matter, microinjections of the novel 5-HT1A receptor agonist into the OFC had anti-aggressive properties, thereby opposing most of the findings described above [105]. Finally, a recent pharmacological study implicated the 5-HT2C receptor in aggressive behavior as well; 5-HT2C receptor antagonism with the compound SB243213 reduced social-isolation-induced aggression [106].
In humans, multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 5-HT2A receptor have been related to antisocial and aggressive behavior in young adults diagnosed with conduct disorder and in two traditional and one industrial Russian populations [107][108]. Furthermore, post-mortem investigations of the OFC in nine individuals with a history of antisocial behavior and substance use disorder (SUD) revealed increased 5-HT2A receptor levels compared to a SUD-only group and healthy controls [109]. However, frontal cortex 5-HT2A receptor binding density could not be linked to trait aggressiveness or impulsivity in healthy human subjects [110]. Interestingly, the same research group did report a positive correlation between striatal 5-HT1B receptor binding and the trait anger in violent offenders [111]. Somewhat surprising, given the finding of da Cunha-Bang and colleagues [110], the 5-HT1B receptor SNP rs6296 could only be related to childhood aggressiveness but did not associate with aggression during adulthood in a Finnish population [112]. In a third study, da Cunha-Bang and colleagues [113] used the fact that 5-HT4 receptor binding could be used as a proxy for 5-HT levels. Here, total 5-HT4 receptor radiotracer binding correlated highly with self-reported aggression levels in men. In other words, the lower the global serotonin level, the higher the self-reported aggression score.
Dopamine is a neurotransmitter attributing salience to stimuli, generating perceptional valence, and thereby promoting motivation to act. It also helps animals and human beings to obtain rewards and avoid negative outcomes. Dopamine asserts control over neuronal activity via two groups of dopaminergic receptors—the d1-like and the d2—like family. The first group consists of d1- and d5-receptors, the latter one of d2-, d3-, and d4-receptors [114].
Mahadevia and colleagues [45] were able to pinpoint augmented aggression in mice to a d2-receptor-mediated mechanism in the LS, while aggression self-administration and aggressive behavior were controlled by NAc d1-receptor neurons [34] through the transcription factor ΔfosB [115]. On the other hand, d1 receptors were found to be significantly reduced in the frontal cortex [116], with lower dopamine concentrations in the PFC as well as the hippocampus in highly aggressive rodents [117]. These findings were supported by a large gene expression investigation revealing Slc-gene-related alterations linked to repeated victorious aggressive encounters in mice [118]. In this research, Slc genes linked amongst others to the dopamine transporter were significantly downregulated in the VTA as well as the NAc, with upregulation patterns in the PFC. Somewhat consistently, methylphenidate, a dopamine transporter blocker, reduced aggression and promoted sociability in mice [119]. Bridging these differences, the administration of a novel dopamine stabilizing compound (-)-OSU61612 had reportedly anti-aggression properties in socially isolated rats [120].
The results outlined above appeared to be translatable since the work of Pape et al. [121] concluded that methylphenidate led to a normalization of NAc connectivity to cortical regions linked to moral decision-making and attention in adolescents with disruptive behavior disorder. However, behavioral changes were not assessed during the exploration.
An array of investigations looking at variations in dopamine genes revealed a significant correlation with aggressive behaviors. In children, for instance, the seven-repeat allele variant of the d4 receptor gene served as a significant predictor for aggression and violence in a four-year follow-up study [122]. Similar findings were described in young adults by Buchmann et al. [123] and Wu and Barnes [124], who were able to link the variant to both aggression and altered cortisol responses, as well as psychopathy. Furthermore, the seven-repeat allele variant was highly present in a cohort of Russian and Chechen felons convicted for severe violent crimes, while a functional variant of the dopamine transporter was more associated with habitual offenders [125]. The same dopamine transporter gene variant was also found to be more prevalent in Pakistani inmates convicted of murder [126].
The degradation process of serotonin and dopamine occurs mainly through two enzymes—monoamino-oxydase (MAOA) and catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) [127]. Both enzymes are known to have functional genetic variants linked to aggression and antisocial behavior, which have been studied extensively over the past decades [128]. Several upstream variable-number tandem repeat variations (uVNTRs) have been described in the promotor region of the MAOA gene, which controls its enzymatic activity. Of those, the two-repeat variant (2R; MAOA-low) is associated with lower transcriptional efficiency than the more common three- or four-repeat variants (3R or 4R; MAOA-high), resulting in different metabolic efficacies [127]. While MAOA occurs in both the degradation of serotonin and dopamine, COMT regulates exclusively extracellular dopamine levels by metabolizing dopamine into 3-Methoxytyramine (3-MT), which is in turn converted into homovanillic acid (HVA) by MAOA. The most common functional COMT polymorphism is Val108/158Met, where the amino acid methionine is replaced by valine with the Val/Val variant causing the enzyme to be two to four times more active [129].
In their landmark study from 2002, Caspi and colleagues [130] were the first to demonstrate an interaction between violence, adverse childhood events, and the MAOA-low variant. However, Ficks and Waldman [131] called the overall effect size of MAOA uVNTRs on antisocial behavior, including aggression, “modest” in their meta-analysis of 31 follow-up studies. Hence, it seems intriguing that there are criminal proceedings allowing MAOA-low genotyping as evidence, even resulting in lesser charges or sentences [132]. However, the most substantial evidence for the role of MAOA in aggression was demonstrated by MAOA knockout mice being more aggressive [133] and an observation made by Labonté and colleagues [134]. In the latter study, genetic modification of the expression of a long noncoding RNA regulating MAOA in the hippocampus led to a decrease in MAOA and an exacerbation of impulsive aggression in mice. Similar results were reported via pharmacological inhibition of MAOA during developmental phases in rodents [135]. Since pharmacological blockade of serotonin reuptake reduced the augmented aggression in MAOA-deficient mice, aggression may very well be a presynaptic serotoninergic effect rather than dopamine-mediated [136]. On the other hand, a recent study on 150 forensic psychiatric outpatients receiving aggression treatment cooperated the trauma and aggression interaction findings, but only for those patients with multiple traumas. Additionally, no effect on the treatment outcome was reported [137]. Nonetheless, a study a novel EEG based investigation pointed to hyper-responsiveness to threatening voices in MAO-low carriers [138] and increased aggressive reactivity to provocation [139] as well as morphological changes in the amygdala [140], while other studies in different ethnicities fully replicated Caspi’s findings [141][142]. To complicate matters more, gender may play a role as well. The MAOA × childhood experiences × aggression interaction had opposing effects in male and female participants and could be linked to amygdala activity during a reactive aggression task [143]. Finally, a study on male Italian prisoners reported dissuading results. Higher scores of aggression self-reports were observed in MAOA-low carriers, but only if they were exposed to physical neglect during growing-up; otherwise, the highest scores were those of MAOA-high carriers [144]. Similarly, Zhang et al. [145] reported the MAOA-high carrier to be the most aggressive in Chinese male adolescents, provided that a second polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene was present.
The Valine/Methionine (Val/Met) COMT SNP research in human beings produced contradicting results regarding which variant (Val/Val or Met/Met) may influence more aggression or be linked to psychopathy [129][146], though the Met/Met-induced aggressive behavior was shown to be phenotypically preserved across species [147]. On the contrary, Hygen and colleagues [148] suggested that the Val/Val variant makes adolescents more malleable, rather than vulnerable, to adverse childhood experiences, leading to more aggressive behaviors. In line with this, male adolescent carrier for the Val/Val variant and with attention deficit disorder displayed poorer impulse control and reduced fear empathy [149]. Then again, Val/Val carriers in a Swedish population were associated with lower levels of physical aggression when exposed to violence compared to Met/Met carriers while still having a positive parent-child relationship [150]. Finally, the work of Fritz and colleagues [151] suggested a possible novel angle that may explain some of the dichotomous findings. In their study, a double SNP analysis focusing on the degradation pathway of dopamine was conducted in forensic inpatients. The adverse childhood x aggression interaction occurred only in participants carrying both the Val/Val highly active and the MAOA-low variants, suggesting that 3-MT may be responsible for the aggressive phenotype.

2.2. Glutamate

Glutamate is the most important excitatory neurotransmitter in the CNS and mediates its effect through two classes of receptors—ionotropic and metabotropic receptors. The most prominent ionotropic receptors are the α-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and Glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. In the metabotropic receptor class, there are currently eight receptors in three functional groups described—mGluR1 and mGluR5 (group I), mGluR2 and mGluR3 (group II), and mGluR4, mGluR6, mGluR7, and mGluR8 (group III) [152].
In 2004, work from Vekovischeva and colleagues [153] first implicated a direct role of AMPA receptors in aggression, as mice with genetically deleted or functionally reduced AMPA receptors show significantly less inter-male aggressive behavior. Ten years later, a pharmacological approach with a systemic administration of an AMPA receptor antagonist corroborated those findings [154]. Interestingly, higher AMPA receptor levels were reported in the amygdala and the PFC in highly aggressive mice [155]. Finally, Zha et al. [156] demonstrated that projections from the VMHvl to the posterior part of the amygdala mediated aggression in an AMPA receptor-dependent manner.
Contrarily, targeting NMDA receptors to alter aggressive behavior appears to yield a somewhat biphasic response. Systemic ketamine administration, an NMDA receptor antagonist, decreased aggression at high doses but augmented it at low doses in adolescent mice [157]. Pharmacological blocking of NMDA receptors restricted to the PFC, however, had a diminishing effect of aggression in MAOA deficient mice solidly [158][159]. Targeting NMDA receptor subunits like GluN1 further strengthened these pharmacological findings, as GluN1 knockout mice displayed reduced aggressive behavior [160]. Furthermore, decreases in GluN2b subunit expression in the lateral amygdala was associated with aggression in socially isolated rodents [161].
Amongst the three groups of metabotropic receptors, interventions targeting group I had the most substantial effect. Blocking mGluR5 pharmacologically induced significant alterations in aggressiveness in both mice and hamsters [162][163]. Finally, recent work in mice implicated a small subpopulation of VTA glutamatergic neurons receiving strong inputs from the habenula to turn escape behavior into reactive, defensive aggression [164].
Somewhat surprising were the reported findings from Craig et al. [165]. In their study, ACC glutamatergic concentrations in the ACC were distinguishable according to the prevalent trait in the participants. Whereas callous-unemotional individuals had increased glutamate levels in the ACC, those showing proactive aggression had decreased levels. In line with these findings, another study investigating aggressive behavior in individuals with antisocial personality disorder found a positive correlation between glutamine (a precursor for glutamate) levels in the dlPFC and aggression [166]. However, Ende and colleagues [167] did not observe augmented ACC glutamate levels in aggressive test subjects with borderline personality disorder, though a positive correlation was shown with measures of impulsivity.

2.3. γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA)

GABA is the inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system and binds to two classes of receptors, the GABAA receptor, a ligand-gated ion channel, and the GABAB-receptor, a metabotropic G protein-coupled receptor [168][169]. Both received substantial scientific attention in the context of aggression, especially since it became apparent that alcohol mediates some of its CNS effects through GABAergic receptors (for a summary of earlier research, please see [170]).
In mice, a recent systematic analysis combining microarray, quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based spectroscopy linked a 40% reduction of GABA in the ACC together with a 20-fold increase of the GABA-degrading enzyme Abat to excessive aggression in mice [171]. On the other hand, a pharmacology-based approach micro-infusing the GABAA receptor agonist muscimol into the ACC demonstrated an increase in hyper-aggressiveness in mice [172]. Similarly, muscimol infusion into the LS changed the behavior of defeated Syrian hamsters from submissive to aggressive [173], an effect that was corroborated by Borland and colleagues [174] independent of the social experience of defeat. In line with these findings, muscimol- driven GABAA receptor activation of the OFC yielded the same behavioral outcome in rats, suggesting that GABAA receptors may play an important role in the modulation of aggression [23]. In a global genetic modification approach using point-mutated mice, Newman and colleagues [175] further specified the GABAA receptors containing an α2 subunit to be mediating aggression. Aside from some methodological oddities, novel optogenetic stimulation of neuronal pathways connecting through or originating in GABAergic neurons in the medial amygdala pointed collectively towards a central GABAergic role in promoting aggression [62][64][176][177].
On a human level, the aforementioned preclinical findings appear to be translatable. In both patients with attention deficit disorder and borderline personality disorder, GABA levels in the ACC negatively correlated with self-rating aggression scores in an MRI-based spectroscopy approach [167]. Blood GABA concentrations in violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder positively correlated with aggression [178]. Furthermore, GABAA receptor 2 gene polymorphisms rs279826 and rs279858 A-allele carriers were demonstrated to have an adverse stressful life event and aggression interaction [179].

2.4. Inflammatory Markers

Cytokines and prostaglandins have been demonstrated to act both as mediators of inflammation and neurotransmitters [180][181]. Hence, it is not surprising that several studies on cats were able to demonstrate a link between cytokine administration and augmented aggression [182][183][184]. In line with this, genetic deletion of the two tumor-necrosis-factor alpha receptors caused the durations of aggression to decrease [185]. Interestingly, a study based on a resident-intruder-challenge revealed that pharmacological or genetic alterations of interleukin-1 receptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus consistently increased aggressive behavior in mice [186]. Finally, lipopolysaccharide challenges in rats selected for the trait “aggressiveness” caused an augmented upregulation of interleukin-1 in the frontal cortex but a decrease in the hippocampus compared to controls [187].
In humans, studies from Coccaro and colleagues [188][189] were able to link peripheral interleukin-6 to impulsive-aggressive subjects and increased cerebrospinal fluid levels of the soluble interleukin-1 receptor II to aggressive patients with personality disorders. Earlier work of Provencal and others [190] found the anti-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-4 and interleukin-10 to be lower in children with aggression issues. However, a recent study failed to find an association between functional SNPs within interleukin-1beta, interleukin-2, and interleukin-6 in aggressive children [191].

2.5. Opioid Receptors

The mu(µ)-opioid receptor 1 (OPRM1) is commonly regarded as the most relevant opioid receptor for aggression. Especially its functional single nucleotide polymorphism C77G (corresponding to A118G in human beings) was linked to augmented cortisol responses and heightened aggressive behavior in rhesus monkeys [192]. Driscoll and colleagues [193] further supported this interaction, linked it to serotonin, and expanded it as a predictor of alcohol-stimulated aggression. It is also worthwhile mentioning that heroin addicted rats produced more aggressive offspring than their control group, which likely suggests that µ-opioid receptor activation causes aggressive behaviors [194]. In another study, Weidler et al. [195] demonstrated a correlation between the OPRM1 SNP A118G and physical aggression in human beings. A very recent work of Cimino and colleagues [196] was also able to associate the A118G SNP with disruptive behavior and limitation in mood regulation in children.

2.6. Orexin

Preclinical and clinical research also indicates a central role for orexin in the control of aggressive behavior. Recent work from Flanigan and colleagues [197] implicated orexin signaling via the orexin 2 receptor (OxR2) on GABAergic cells in the lateral habenula to play a role in intermale aggression in mice. Previously, the same group has also suggested orexin to control the valence of aggression through a strong habenula-to-VTA neuronal connectivity in mice [198].
In humans, the HCRTR1 rs2271933 A/A carrier genotype was associated with heightened aggressive behavior [199]. Such genotype-phenotype interaction was argued to be based on an augmented reward association with violence [200].

2.7. Oxytocin/Vasopressin

Oxytocin and vasopressin are fundamentally linked and guide the regulation of social behavior, such as parental nurturing and social cognition, but they also relate to affective states and emotional discrimination [201][202][203]. Over the last decades, the hormone vasopressin has received a great amount of attention in the context of aggression (for a detailed review, see [204]). For instance, vasopressin release patterns were demonstrated to differ in low and high-anxiety rat strains across brain areas in the context of intermale aggression [205]. Furthermore, glutamate-vasopressin interaction in the lateral hypothalamus augmented steroid-induced aggression in Syrian hamsters [206]. Conversely, genetic deletion of the vasopressin receptor 1b (V1b) reduced aggression in male mice [207]. Somewhat counterintuitive, heightened oxytocin levels in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) and the amygdala was also linked to high levels of maternal aggression in lactating rats [208]. The interplay between oxytocin and vasopressin continued to be complex, as demonstrated in recent work in the ventral and dorsal LS [209]. Using a mixed neuropharmacological, optogenetic, and chemogenetic approach, Oliveira and colleagues showed that an increase in oxytocin level in the ventral LS and a decrease in vasopressin level in the dorsal LS were associated with aggressive behavior in rats. Strikingly, systemic administration of both vasopressin and oxytocin suppressed isolation-enhanced aggressive behavior in male mice in the social interaction test [210].
On a human level, intranasal administration of vasopressin caused an increase in “preemptive strikes” in a computer simulation in both male and female participants [211]. In test subjects with high Machiavellian traits, a combined administration of testosterone and vasopressin augmented punishing behavior during a provocation paradigm [212]. In a different study, even though increased activity in the right superior temporal sulcus was measured during a competitive reaction game, intranasal vasopressin administration failed to alter the behavior in the test group [213].

References

  1. Yang, Y.; Raine, A. Prefrontal structural and functional brain imaging findings in antisocial, violent, and psychopathic individuals: A meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2009, 174, 81–88.
  2. Bertsch, K.; Florange, J.; Herpertz, S.C. Understanding Brain Mechanisms of Reactive Aggression. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2020, 22, 81.
  3. Alegria, A.A.; Radua, J.; Rubia, K. Meta-Analysis of fMRI Studies of Disruptive Behavior Disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 2016, 173, 1119–1130.
  4. de Brito, S.A.; Mechelli, A.; Wilke, M.; Laurens, K.R.; Jones, A.P.; Barker, G.J.; Hodgins, S.; Viding, E. Size matters: Increased grey matter in boys with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits. Brain 2009, 132, 843–852.
  5. van Heukelum, S.; Tulva, K.; Geers, F.E.; van Dulm, S.; Ruisch, I.H.; Mill, J.; Viana, J.F.; Beckmann, C.F.; Buitelaar, J.K.; Poelmans, G.; et al. A central role for anterior cingulate cortex in the control of pathological aggression. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, 2321–2333.e5.
  6. Chen, C.-Y.; Raine, A.; Chou, K.-H.; Chen, I.-Y.; Hung, D.; Lin, C.-P. Abnormal white matter integrity in rapists as indicated by diffusion tensor imaging. BMC Neurosci. 2016, 17, 45.
  7. Dambacher, F.; Schuhmann, T.; Lobbestael, J.; Arntz, A.; Brugman, S.; Sack, A.T. Reducing proactive aggression through non-invasive brain stimulation. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2015, 10, 1303–1309.
  8. Hortensius, R.; Schutter, D.J.L.G.; Harmon-Jones, E. When anger leads to aggression: Induction of relative left frontal cortical activity with transcranial direct current stimulation increases the anger-aggression relationship. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2012, 7, 342–347.
  9. Dambacher, F.; Schuhmann, T.; Lobbestael, J.; Arntz, A.; Brugman, S.; Sack, A.T. No Effects of Bilateral tDCS over Inferior Frontal Gyrus on Response Inhibition and Aggression. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132170.
  10. Choy, O.; Raine, A.; Hamilton, R.H. Stimulation of the Prefrontal Cortex Reduces Intentions to Commit Aggression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Stratified, Parallel-Group Trial. J. Neurosci. 2018, 38, 6505–6512.
  11. Cristofori, I.; Zhong, W.; Mandoske, V.; Chau, A.; Krueger, F.; Strenziok, M.; Grafman, J. Brain Regions Influencing Implicit Violent Attitudes: A Lesion-Mapping Study. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 2757–2768.
  12. Perach-Barzilay, N.; Tauber, A.; Klein, E.; Chistyakov, A.; Ne’eman, R.; Shamay-Tsoory, S.G. Asymmetry in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and aggressive behavior: A continuous theta-burst magnetic stimulation study. Soc. Neurosci. 2013, 8, 178–188.
  13. Konikkou, K.; Kostantinou, N.; Fanti, K.A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects emotional processing: Accounting for individual differences in antisocial behavior. J. Exp. Criminol. 2020, 16, 349–366.
  14. Chester, D.S.; Lynam, D.R.; Milich, R.; DeWall, C.N. Physical aggressiveness and gray matter deficits in ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Cortex 2017, 97, 17–22.
  15. Chester, D.S.; Lynam, D.R.; Milich, R.; DeWall, C.N. Neural mechanisms of the rejection-aggression link. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2018, 13, 501–512.
  16. Chester, D.S.; Bell, S.B.; DeWall, C.N.; West, S.J.; Romero-Lopez, M.; Craig, A.W. Neural correlates of intertemporal choice in aggressive behavior. Aggress. Behav. 2019, 45, 507–516.
  17. Thijssen, S.; Ringoot, A.P.; Wildeboer, A.; Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J.; El Marroun, H.; Hofman, A.; Jaddoe, V.W.V.; Verhulst, F.C.; Tiemeier, H.; van IJzendoorn, M.H.; et al. Brain morphology of childhood aggressive behavior: A multi-informant study in school-age children. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2015, 15, 564–577.
  18. Miczek, K.A.; Takahashi, A.; Gobrogge, K.L.; Hwa, L.S.; de Almeida, R.M.M. Escalated Aggression in Animal Models: Shedding New Light on Mesocorticolimbic Circuits. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2015, 3, 90–95.
  19. Takahashi, A.; Nagayasu, K.; Nishitani, N.; Kaneko, S.; Koide, T. Control of intermale aggression by medial prefrontal cortex activation in the mouse. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94657.
  20. Thiebaut de Schotten, M.; Dell’Acqua, F.; Ratiu, P.; Leslie, A.; Howells, H.; Cabanis, E.; Iba-Zizen, M.T.; Plaisant, O.; Simmons, A.; Dronkers, N.F.; et al. From Phineas Gage and Monsieur Leborgne to H.M.: Revisiting Disconnection Syndromes. Cereb. Cortex 2015, 25, 4812–4827.
  21. Bannon, S.M.; Salis, K.L.; Daniel O’Leary, K. Structural brain abnormalities in aggression and violent behavior. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2015, 25, 323–331.
  22. Beyer, F.; Münte, T.F.; Göttlich, M.; Krämer, U.M. Orbitofrontal Cortex Reactivity to Angry Facial Expression in a Social Interaction Correlates with Aggressive Behavior. Cereb. Cortex 2015, 25, 3057–3063.
  23. Kuniishi, H.; Ichisaka, S.; Matsuda, S.; Futora, E.; Harada, R.; Hata, Y. Chronic Inactivation of the Orbitofrontal Cortex Increases Anxiety-Like Behavior and Impulsive Aggression, but Decreases Depression-Like Behavior in Rats. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 250.
  24. Seidenwurm, D.; Pounds, T.R.; Globus, A.; Valk, P.E. Abnormal temporal lobe metabolism in violent subjects: Correlation of imaging and neuropsychiatric findings. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1997, 18, 625–631.
  25. Kruesi, M.J.P.; Casanova, M.F.; Mannheim, G.; Johnson-Bilder, A. Reduced temporal lobe volume in early onset conduct disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2004, 132, 1–11.
  26. Bufkin, J.L.; Luttrell, V.R. Neuroimaging studies of aggressive and violent behavior: Current findings and implications for criminology and criminal justice. Trauma Violence Abus. 2005, 6, 176–191.
  27. Buades-Rotger, M.; Engelke, C.; Beyer, F.; Keevil, B.G.; Brabant, G.; Krämer, U.M. Endogenous testosterone is associated with lower amygdala reactivity to angry faces and reduced aggressive behavior in healthy young women. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38538.
  28. Raine, A. The neuromoral theory of antisocial, violent, and psychopathic behavior. Psychiatry Res. 2019, 277, 64–69.
  29. Nikolic, M.; Pezzoli, P.; Jaworska, N.; Seto, M.C. Brain responses in aggression-prone individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of anger- and aggression-eliciting tasks. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2022, 119, 110596.
  30. Robbins, T.W.; Everitt, B.J. Functions of dopamine in the dorsal and ventral striatum. Semin. Neurosci. 1992, 4, 119–127.
  31. Da Cunha-Bang, S.; Fisher, P.M.; Hjordt, L.V.; Perfalk, E.; Persson Skibsted, A.; Bock, C.; Ohlhues Baandrup, A.; Deen, M.; Thomsen, C.; Sestoft, D.M.; et al. Violent offenders respond to provocations with high amygdala and striatal reactivity. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2017, 12, 802–810.
  32. Yang, Y.; Joshi, S.H.; Jahanshad, N.; Thompson, P.M.; Baker, L.A. Neural correlates of proactive and reactive aggression in adolescent twins. Aggress. Behav. 2017, 43, 230–240.
  33. White, S.F.; Brislin, S.J.; Sinclair, S.; Blair, J.R. Punishing unfairness: Rewarding or the organization of a reactively aggressive response? Hum. Brain Mapp. 2014, 35, 2137–2147.
  34. Golden, S.A.; Jin, M.; Shaham, Y. Animal Models of (or for) Aggression Reward, Addiction, and Relapse: Behavior and Circuits. J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 3996–4008.
  35. Golden, S.A.; Jin, M.; Heins, C.; Venniro, M.; Michaelides, M.; Shaham, Y. Nucleus Accumbens Drd1-Expressing Neurons Control Aggression Self-Administration and Aggression Seeking in Mice. J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 2482–2496.
  36. Golden, S.A.; Aleyasin, H.; Heins, R.; Flanigan, M.; Heshmati, M.; Takahashi, A.; Russo, S.J.; Shaham, Y. Persistent conditioned place preference to aggression experience in adult male sexually-experienced CD-1 mice. Genes Brain Behav. 2017, 16, 44–55.
  37. Falkner, A.L.; Grosenick, L.; Davidson, T.J.; Deisseroth, K.; Lin, D. Hypothalamic control of male aggression-seeking behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 2016, 19, 596–604.
  38. Krizan, Z.; Johar, O. Narcissistic rage revisited. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2015, 108, 784–801.
  39. Spiegel, E.A.; Miller, H.R.; Oppenheimer, M.J. forebrain and rage reactions. J. Neurophysiol. 1940, 3, 538–548.
  40. Siegel, A.; Victoroff, J. Understanding human aggression: New insights from neuroscience. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 2009, 32, 209–215.
  41. Wong, L.C.; Wang, L.; D’Amour, J.A.; Yumita, T.; Chen, G.; Yamaguchi, T.; Chang, B.C.; Bernstein, H.; You, X.; Feng, J.E.; et al. Effective Modulation of Male Aggression through Lateral Septum to Medial Hypothalamus Projection. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 593–604.
  42. Lischinsky, J.E.; Lin, D. Neural mechanisms of aggression across species. Nat. Neurosci. 2020, 23, 1317–1328.
  43. Cupaioli, F.A.; Zucca, F.A.; Caporale, C.; Lesch, K.-P.; Passamonti, L.; Zecca, L. The neurobiology of human aggressive behavior: Neuroimaging, genetic, and neurochemical aspects. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2021, 106, 110059.
  44. Leroy, F.; Park, J.; Asok, A.; Brann, D.H.; Meira, T.; Boyle, L.M.; Buss, E.W.; Kandel, E.R.; Siegelbaum, S.A. A circuit from hippocampal CA2 to lateral septum disinhibits social aggression. Nature 2018, 564, 213–218.
  45. Mahadevia, D.; Saha, R.; Manganaro, A.; Chuhma, N.; Ziolkowski-Blake, A.; Morgan, A.A.; Dumitriu, D.; Rayport, S.; Ansorge, M.S. Dopamine promotes aggression in mice via ventral tegmental area to lateral septum projections. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6796.
  46. Menon, R.; Süß, T.; Oliveira, V.E.d.M.; Neumann, I.D.; Bludau, A. Neurobiology of the lateral septum: Regulation of social behavior. Trends Neurosci. 2022, 45, 27–40.
  47. Hashikawa, Y.; Hashikawa, K.; Falkner, A.L.; Lin, D. Ventromedial Hypothalamus and the Generation of Aggression. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 94.
  48. Roeling, T.A.; Veening, J.G.; Kruk, M.R.; Peters, J.P.; Vermelis, M.E.; Nieuwenhuys, R. Efferent connections of the hypothalamic “aggression area” in the rat. Neuroscience 1994, 59, 1001–1024.
  49. Lin, D.; Boyle, M.P.; Dollar, P.; Lee, H.; Lein, E.S.; Perona, P.; Anderson, D.J. Functional identification of an aggression locus in the mouse hypothalamus. Nature 2011, 470, 221–226.
  50. Biro, L.; Sipos, E.; Bruzsik, B.; Farkas, I.; Zelena, D.; Balazsfi, D.; Toth, M.; Haller, J. Task Division within the Prefrontal Cortex: Distinct Neuron Populations Selectively Control Different Aspects of Aggressive Behavior via the Hypothalamus. J. Neurosci. 2018, 38, 4065–4075.
  51. Gouveia, F.V.; Hamani, C.; Fonoff, E.T.; Brentani, H.; Alho, E.J.L.; de Morais, R.M.C.B.; de Souza, A.L.; Rigonatti, S.P.; Martinez, R.C.R. Amygdala and Hypothalamus: Historical Overview with Focus on Aggression. Neurosurgery 2019, 85, 11–30.
  52. Sano, K.; Mayanagi, Y. Posteromedial hypothalamotomy in the treatment of violent, aggressive behaviour. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 1988, 44, 145–151.
  53. Maley, J.H.; Alvernia, J.E.; Valle, E.P.; Richardson, D. Deep brain stimulation of the orbitofrontal projections for the treatment of intermittent explosive disorder. Neurosurg. Focus 2010, 29, E11.
  54. Franzini, A.; Broggi, G.; Cordella, R.; Dones, I.; Messina, G. Deep-brain stimulation for aggressive and disruptive behavior. World Neurosurg. 2013, 80, S29.e11–S29.e14.
  55. Torres, C.V.; Sola, R.G.; Pastor, J.; Pedrosa, M.; Navas, M.; García-Navarrete, E.; Ezquiaga, E.; García-Camba, E. Long-term results of posteromedial hypothalamic deep brain stimulation for patients with resistant aggressiveness. J. Neurosurg. 2013, 119, 277–287.
  56. Torres, C.V.; Blasco, G.; Navas García, M.; Ezquiaga, E.; Pastor, J.; Vega-Zelaya, L.; Pulido Rivas, P.; Pérez Rodrigo, S.; Manzanares, R. Deep brain stimulation for aggressiveness: Long-term follow-up and tractography study of the stimulated brain areas. J. Neurosurg. 2020, 134, 366–375.
  57. Chang, C.-H.; Gean, P.-W. The Ventral Hippocampus Controls Stress-Provoked Impulsive Aggression through the Ventromedial Hypothalamus in Post-Weaning Social Isolation Mice. Cell Rep. 2019, 28, 1195–1205.e3.
  58. Coccaro, E.F.; Lee, R.; McCloskey, M.; Csernansky, J.G.; Wang, L. Morphometric analysis of amygdla and hippocampus shape in impulsively aggressive and healthy control subjects. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2015, 69, 80–86.
  59. Gilliam, M.; Forbes, E.E.; Gianaros, P.J.; Erickson, K.I.; Brennan, L.M.; Shaw, D.S. Maternal depression in childhood and aggression in young adulthood: Evidence for mediation by offspring amygdala-hippocampal volume ratio. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2015, 56, 1083–1091.
  60. Dailey, N.S.; Smith, R.; Vanuk, J.R.; Raikes, A.C.; Killgore, W.D.S. Resting-state functional connectivity as a biomarker of aggression in mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroreport 2018, 29, 1413–1417.
  61. Haller, J. The role of central and medial amygdala in normal and abnormal aggression: A review of classical approaches. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018, 85, 34–43.
  62. Unger, E.K.; Burke, K.J.; Yang, C.F.; Bender, K.J.; Fuller, P.M.; Shah, N.M. Medial amygdalar aromatase neurons regulate aggression in both sexes. Cell Rep. 2015, 10, 453–462.
  63. Yamaguchi, T.; Wei, D.; Song, S.C.; Lim, B.; Tritsch, N.X.; Lin, D. Posterior amygdala regulates sexual and aggressive behaviors in male mice. Nat. Neurosci. 2020, 23, 1111–1124.
  64. Nordman, J.; Li, Z. The Dorsal Raphe Regulates the Duration of Attack through the Medial Orbitofrontal Cortex and Medial Amygdala. eNeuro 2020, 7, 1–15.
  65. Abellán-Álvaro, M.; Martínez-García, F.; Lanuza, E.; Agustín-Pavón, C. Inhibition of the medial amygdala disrupts escalated aggression in lactating female mice after repeated exposure to male intruders. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 980.
  66. Da Cunha-Bang, S.; Fisher, P.M.; Hjordt, L.V.; Holst, K.; Knudsen, G.M. Amygdala reactivity to fearful faces correlates positively with impulsive aggression. Soc. Neurosci. 2019, 14, 162–172.
  67. Pardini, D.A.; Raine, A.; Erickson, K.; Loeber, R. Lower amygdala volume in men is associated with childhood aggression, early psychopathic traits, and future violence. Biol. Psychiatry 2014, 75, 73–80.
  68. Bell, C.; Tesli, N.; Gurholt, T.P.; Rokicki, J.; Hjell, G.; Fischer-Vieler, T.; Melle, I.; Agartz, I.; Andreassen, O.A.; Rasmussen, K.; et al. Associations between amygdala nuclei volumes, psychosis, psychopathy, and violent offending. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 2022, 319, 111416.
  69. Saxbe, D.; Lyden, H.; Gimbel, S.I.; Sachs, M.; Del Piero, L.B.; Margolin, G.; Kaplan, J.T. Longitudinal Associations Between Family Aggression, Externalizing Behavior, and the Structure and Function of the Amygdala. J. Res. Adolesc. 2018, 28, 134–149.
  70. Raine, A.; Meloy, J.R.; Bihrle, S.; Stoddard, J.; Lacasse, L.; Buchsbaum, M.S. Reduced prefrontal and increased subcortical brain functioning assessed using positron emission tomography in predatory and affective murderers. Behav. Sci. Law 1998, 16, 319–332.
  71. Heesink, L.; Edward Gladwin, T.; Terburg, D.; van Honk, J.; Kleber, R.; Geuze, E. Proximity alert! Distance related cuneus activation in military veterans with anger and aggression problems. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 2017, 266, 114–122.
  72. Varkevisser, T.; Gladwin, T.E.; Heesink, L.; van Honk, J.; Geuze, E. Resting-state functional connectivity in combat veterans suffering from impulsive aggression. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2017, 12, 1881–1889.
  73. Ibrahim, K.; Kalvin, C.; Morand-Beaulieu, S.; He, G.; Pelphrey, K.A.; McCarthy, G.; Sukhodolsky, D.G. Amygdala-prefrontal connectivity in children with maladaptive aggression is modulated by social impairment. Cereb. Cortex 2022, 32, 4371–4385.
  74. Saxbe, D.; Khoddam, H.; Del Piero, L.; Stoycos, S.A.; Gimbel, S.I.; Margolin, G.; Kaplan, J.T. Community violence exposure in early adolescence: Longitudinal associations with hippocampal and amygdala volume and resting state connectivity. Dev. Sci. 2018, 21, e12686.
  75. Sukhodolsky, D.G.; Ibrahim, K.; Kalvin, C.B.; Jordan, R.P.; Eilbott, J.; Hampson, M. Increased amygdala and decreased frontolimbic r esting- s tate functional connectivity in children with aggressive behavior. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2022, 17, 634–644.
  76. Beyer, F.; Münte, T.F.; Wiechert, J.; Heldmann, M.; Krämer, U.M. Trait aggressiveness is not related to structural connectivity between orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e101105.
  77. Yu, Q.; Teixeira, C.M.; Mahadevia, D.; Huang, Y.-Y.; Balsam, D.; Mann, J.J.; Gingrich, J.A.; Ansorge, M.S. Optogenetic stimulation of DAergic VTA neurons increases aggression. Mol. Psychiatry 2014, 19, 635.
  78. Fuxjager, M.J.; Forbes-Lorman, R.M.; Coss, D.J.; Auger, C.J.; Auger, A.P.; Marler, C.A. Winning territorial disputes selectively enhances androgen sensitivity in neural pathways related to motivation and social aggression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 12393–12398.
  79. Buckholtz, J.W.; Treadway, M.T.; Cowan, R.L.; Woodward, N.D.; Benning, S.D.; Li, R.; Ansari, M.S.; Baldwin, R.M.; Schwartzman, A.N.; Shelby, E.S.; et al. Mesolimbic dopamine reward system hypersensitivity in individuals with psychopathic traits. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13, 419–421.
  80. Been, L.E.; Gibbons, A.B.; Meisel, R.L. Towards a neurobiology of female aggression. Neuropharmacology 2019, 156, 107451.
  81. Sun, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wang, X. Altered Resting-State Functional Connectivity in the Default Mode Network in Male Juvenile Violent Offenders. Brain Imaging Behav. 2022, 16, 608–616.
  82. Werhahn, J.E.; Mohl, S.; Willinger, D.; Smigielski, L.; Roth, A.; Hofstetter, C.; Stämpfli, P.; Naaijen, J.; Mulder, L.M.; Glennon, J.C.; et al. Aggression subtypes relate to distinct resting state functional connectivity in children and adolescents with disruptive behavior. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2021, 30, 1237–1249.
  83. Coccaro, E.F.; Keedy, S.; Malina, M.; Lee, R.; Phan, K.L. Neuronal responses in social-emotional information processing in impulsive aggressive individuals. Neuropsychopharmacology 2022, 47, 1249–1255.
  84. Beyer, F.; Münte, T.F.; Krämer, U.M. Increased neural reactivity to socio-emotional stimuli links social exclusion and aggression. Biol. Psychol. 2014, 96, 102–110.
  85. Zhu, W.; Zhou, X.; Xia, L.-X. Brain structures and functional connectivity associated with individual differences in trait proactive aggression. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7731.
  86. Berger, M.; Gray, J.A.; Roth, B.L. The expanded biology of serotonin. Annu. Rev. Med. 2009, 60, 355–366.
  87. Hoyer, D.; Clarke, D.E.; Fozard, J.R.; Hartig, P.R.; Martin, G.R.; Mylecharane, E.J.; Saxena, P.R.; Humphrey, P.P. International Union of Pharmacology classification of receptors for 5-hydroxytryptamine (Serotonin). Pharmacol. Rev. 1994, 46, 157–203.
  88. Linnoila, M.; Virkkunen, M.; Scheinin, M.; Nuutila, A.; Rimon, R.; Goodwin, F.K. Low cerebrospinal fluid 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid concentration differentiates impulsive from nonimpulsive violent behavior. Life Sci. 1983, 33, 2609–2614.
  89. Duke, A.A.; Bègue, L.; Bell, R.; Eisenlohr-Moul, T. Revisiting the serotonin-aggression relation in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2013, 139, 1148–1172.
  90. Walther, D.J.; Peter, J.-U.; Bashammakh, S.; Hörtnagl, H.; Voits, M.; Fink, H.; Bader, M. Synthesis of serotonin by a second tryptophan hydroxylase isoform. Science 2003, 299, 76.
  91. Kästner, N.; Richter, S.H.; Urbanik, S.; Kunert, J.; Waider, J.; Lesch, K.-P.; Kaiser, S.; Sachser, N. Brain serotonin deficiency affects female aggression. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1366.
  92. Meng, X.; Grandjean, J.; Sbrini, G.; Schipper, P.; Hofwijks, N.; Stoop, J.; Calabrese, F.; Homberg, J. Tryptophan Hydroxylase 2 Knockout Male Rats Exhibit a Strengthened Oxytocin System, Are Aggressive, and Are Less Anxious. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2022, 13, 2974–2981.
  93. Svirin, E.; Veniaminova, E.; Costa-Nunes, J.P.; Gorlova, A.; Umriukhin, A.; Kalueff, A.V.; Proshin, A.; Anthony, D.C.; Nedorubov, A.; Tse, A.C.K.; et al. Predation Stress Causes Excessive Aggression in Female Mice with Partial Genetic Inactivation of Tryptophan Hydroxylase-2: Evidence for Altered Myelination-Related Processes. Cells 2022, 11, 1036.
  94. Gorlova, A.; Ortega, G.; Waider, J.; Bazhenova, N.; Veniaminova, E.; Proshin, A.; Kalueff, A.V.; Anthony, D.C.; Lesch, K.-P.; Strekalova, T. Stress-induced aggression in heterozygous TPH2 mutant mice is associated with alterations in serotonin turnover and expression of 5-HT6 and AMPA subunit 2A receptors. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 272, 440–451.
  95. Peeters, D.G.A.; de Boer, S.F.; Terneusen, A.; Newman-Tancredi, A.; Varney, M.A.; Verkes, R.-J.; Homberg, J.R. Enhanced aggressive phenotype of Tph2 knockout rats is associated with diminished 5-HT1A receptor sensitivity. Neuropharmacology 2019, 153, 134–141.
  96. Takahashi, A.; Shiroishi, T.; Koide, T. Genetic mapping of escalated aggression in wild-derived mouse strain MSM/Ms: Association with serotonin-related genes. Front. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 156.
  97. Yang, J.; Lee, M.-S.; Lee, S.-H.; Lee, B.-C.; Kim, S.-H.; Joe, S.-H.; Jung, I.-K.; Choi, I.-G.; Ham, B.-J. Association between tryptophan hydroxylase 2 polymorphism and anger-related personality traits among young Korean women. Neuropsychobiology 2010, 62, 158–163.
  98. Yoon, H.-K.; Lee, H.-J.; Kim, L.; Lee, M.-S.; Ham, B.-J. Impact of tryptophan hydroxylase 2 G-703T polymorphism on anger-related personality traits and orbitofrontal cortex. Behav. Brain Res. 2012, 231, 105–110.
  99. Booij, L.; Turecki, G.; Leyton, M.; Gravel, P.; Lopez De Lara, C.; Diksic, M.; Benkelfat, C. Tryptophan hydroxylase(2) gene polymorphisms predict brain serotonin synthesis in the orbitofrontal cortex in humans. Mol. Psychiatry 2012, 17, 809–817.
  100. Laas, K.; Kiive, E.; Mäestu, J.; Vaht, M.; Veidebaum, T.; Harro, J. Nice guys: Homozygocity for the TPH2 -703G/T (rs4570625) minor allele promotes low aggressiveness and low anxiety. J. Affect. Disord. 2017, 215, 230–236.
  101. Studer, E.; Näslund, J.; Andersson, E.; Nilsson, S.; Westberg, L.; Eriksson, E. Serotonin depletion-induced maladaptive aggression requires the presence of androgens. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126462.
  102. Audero, E.; Mlinar, B.; Baccini, G.; Skachokova, Z.K.; Corradetti, R.; Gross, C. Suppression of serotonin neuron firing increases aggression in mice. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 8678–8688.
  103. Tan, O.; Martin, L.J.; Bowen, M.T. Divergent pathways mediate 5-HT1A receptor agonist effects on close social interaction, grooming and aggressive behaviour in mice: Exploring the involvement of the oxytocin and vasopressin systems. J. Psychopharmacol. 2020, 34, 795–805.
  104. Terranova, J.I.; Song, Z.; Larkin, T.E.; Hardcastle, N.; Norvelle, A.; Riaz, A.; Albers, H.E. Serotonin and arginine-vasopressin mediate sex differences in the regulation of dominance and aggression by the social brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 13233–13238.
  105. Stein, D.J.; Miczek, K.A.; Lucion, A.B.; de Almeida, R.M.M. Aggression-reducing effects of F15599, a novel selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist, after microinjection into the ventral orbital prefrontal cortex, but not in infralimbic cortex in male mice. Psychopharmacology 2013, 230, 375–387.
  106. Yu, W.; Xu, H.; Xue, Y.; An, D.; Li, H.; Chen, W.; Yu, D.; Sun, Y.; Ma, J.; Tang, Y.; et al. 5-HT2CR antagonist/5-HT2CR inverse agonist recovered the increased isolation-induced aggressive behavior of BALB/c mice mediated by ADAR1 (p110) expression and Htr2c RNA editing. Brain Behav. 2018, 8, e00929.
  107. Butovskaya, M.L.; Butovskaya, P.R.; Vasilyev, V.A.; Sukhodolskaya, J.M.; Fekhredtinova, D.I.; Karelin, D.V.; Fedenok, J.N.; Mabulla, A.Z.P.; Ryskov, A.P.; Lazebny, O.E. Serotonergic gene polymorphisms (5-HTTLPR, 5HTR1A, 5HTR2A), and population differences in aggression: Traditional (Hadza and Datoga) and industrial (Russians) populations compared. J. Physiol. Anthropol. 2018, 37, 10.
  108. Nedic Erjavec, G.; Tudor, L.; Nikolac Perkovic, M.; Podobnik, J.; Dodig Curkovic, K.; Curkovic, M.; Svob Strac, D.; Cusek, M.; Bortolato, M.; Pivac, N. Serotonin 5-HT2A receptor polymorphisms are associated with irritability and aggression in conduct disorder. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2022, 117, 110542.
  109. Braccagni, G.; Scheggi, S.; Bortolato, M. Elevated levels of serotonin 5-HT2A receptors in the orbitofrontal cortex of antisocial individuals. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2022, 1–15.
  110. Da Cunha-Bang, S.; Stenbæk, D.S.; Holst, K.; Licht, C.L.; Jensen, P.S.; Frokjaer, V.G.; Mortensen, E.L.; Knudsen, G.M. Trait aggression and trait impulsivity are not related to frontal cortex 5-HT2A receptor binding in healthy individuals. Psychiatry Res. 2013, 212, 125–131.
  111. Da Cunha-Bang, S.; Hjordt, L.V.; Perfalk, E.; Beliveau, V.; Bock, C.; Lehel, S.; Thomsen, C.; Sestoft, D.; Svarer, C.; Knudsen, G.M. Serotonin 1B Receptor Binding Is Associated with Trait Anger and Level of Psychopathy in Violent Offenders. Biol. Psychiatry 2017, 82, 267–274.
  112. Hakulinen, C.; Jokela, M.; Hintsanen, M.; Merjonen, P.; Pulkki-Råback, L.; Seppälä, I.; Lyytikäinen, L.-P.; Lehtimäki, T.; Kähönen, M.; Viikari, J.; et al. Serotonin receptor 1B genotype and hostility, anger and aggressive behavior through the lifespan: The Young Finns study. J. Behav. Med. 2013, 36, 583–590.
  113. Da Cunha-Bang, S.; Mc Mahon, B.; Fisher, P.M.; Jensen, P.S.; Svarer, C.; Knudsen, G.M. High trait aggression in men is associated with low 5-HT levels, as indexed by 5-HT4 receptor binding. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2016, 11, 548–555.
  114. Beaulieu, J.-M.; Gainetdinov, R.R. The physiology, signaling, and pharmacology of dopamine receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 2011, 63, 182–217.
  115. Aleyasin, H.; Flanigan, M.E.; Golden, S.A.; Takahashi, A.; Menard, C.; Pfau, M.L.; Multer, J.; Pina, J.; McCabe, K.A.; Bhatti, N.; et al. Cell-Type-Specific Role of ΔFosB in Nucleus Accumbens in Modulating Intermale Aggression. J. Neurosci. 2018, 38, 5913–5924.
  116. Felippe, R.M.; Oliveira, G.M.; Barbosa, R.S.; Esteves, B.D.; Gonzaga, B.M.S.; Horita, S.I.M.; Garzoni, L.R.; Beghini, D.G.; Araújo-Jorge, T.C.; Fragoso, V.M.S. Experimental Social Stress: Dopaminergic Receptors, Oxidative Stress, and c-Fos Protein Are Involved in Highly Aggressive Behavior. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 696834.
  117. Patki, G.; Atrooz, F.; Alkadhi, I.; Solanki, N.; Salim, S. High aggression in rats is associated with elevated stress, anxiety-like behavior, and altered catecholamine content in the brain. Neurosci. Lett. 2015, 584, 308–313.
  118. Smagin, D.A.; Babenko, V.N.; Redina, O.E.; Kovalenko, I.L.; Galyamina, A.G.; Kudryavtseva, N.N. Reduced Expression of Slc Genes in the VTA and NAcc of Male Mice with Positive Fighting Experience. Genes 2021, 12, 1099.
  119. Zoratto, F.; Franchi, F.; Macrì, S.; Laviola, G. Methylphenidate administration promotes sociability and reduces aggression in a mouse model of callousness. Psychopharmacology 2019, 236, 2593–2611.
  120. Studer, E.; Näslund, J.; Westman, A.; Carlsson, A.; Eriksson, E. The effects of the dopamine stabilizer (-)-OSU6162 on aggressive and sexual behavior in rodents. Transl. Psychiatry 2016, 6, e762.
  121. Pape, L.; van Lith, K.; Veltman, D.; Cohn, M.; Marhe, R.; van den Brink, W.; Doreleijers, T.; Popma, A. Effect of Methylphenidate on Resting-State Connectivity in Adolescents with a Disruptive Behavior Disorder: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled fMRI Study. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 662652.
  122. Farbiash, T.; Berger, A.; Atzaba-Poria, N.; Auerbach, J.G. Prediction of preschool aggression from DRD4 risk, parental ADHD symptoms, and home chaos. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2014, 42, 489–499.
  123. Buchmann, A.F.; Zohsel, K.; Blomeyer, D.; Hohm, E.; Hohmann, S.; Jennen-Steinmetz, C.; Treutlein, J.; Becker, K.; Banaschewski, T.; Schmidt, M.H.; et al. Interaction between prenatal stress and dopamine D4 receptor genotype in predicting aggression and cortisol levels in young adults. Psychopharmacology 2014, 231, 3089–3097.
  124. Wu, T.; Barnes, J.C. Two dopamine receptor genes (DRD2 and DRD4) predict psychopathic personality traits in a sample of American adults. J. Crim. Justice 2013, 41, 188–195.
  125. Cherepkova, E.V.; Maksimov, V.N.; Kushnarev, A.P.; Shakhmatov, I.I.; Aftanas, L.I. The polymorphism of dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) and dopamine transporter (DAT) genes in the men with antisocial behaviour and mixed martial arts fighters. World J. Biol. Psychiatry 2019, 20, 402–415.
  126. Qadeer, M.I.; Amar, A.; Mann, J.J.; Hasnain, S. Polymorphisms in dopaminergic system genes; association with criminal behavior and self-reported aggression in violent prison inmates from Pakistan. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173571.
  127. Kolla, N.J.; Bortolato, M. The role of monoamine oxidase A in the neurobiology of aggressive, antisocial, and violent behavior: A tale of mice and men. Prog. Neurobiol. 2020, 194, 101875.
  128. Iofrida, C.; Palumbo, S.; Pellegrini, S. Molecular genetics and antisocial behavior: Where do we stand? Exp. Biol. Med. 2014, 239, 1514–1523.
  129. Qayyum, A.; Zai, C.C.; Hirata, Y.; Tiwari, A.K.; Cheema, S.; Nowrouzi, B.; Beitchman, J.H.; Kennedy, J.L. The Role of the Catechol-o-Methyltransferase (COMT) GeneVal158Met in Aggressive Behavior, a Review of Genetic Studies. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2015, 13, 802–814.
  130. Caspi, A.; McClay, J.; Moffitt, T.E.; Mill, J.; Martin, J.; Craig, I.W.; Taylor, A.; Poulton, R. Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 2002, 297, 851–854.
  131. Ficks, C.A.; Waldman, I.D. Candidate genes for aggression and antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of association studies of the 5HTTLPR and MAOA-uVNTR. Behav. Genet. 2014, 44, 427–444.
  132. McSwiggan, S.; Elger, B.; Appelbaum, P.S. The forensic use of behavioral genetics in criminal proceedings: Case of the MAOA-L genotype. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 2017, 50, 17–23.
  133. Shih, J.C.; Chen, K. MAO-A and -B gene knock-out mice exhibit distinctly different behavior. Neurobiology 1999, 7, 235–246.
  134. Labonté, B.; Abdallah, K.; Maussion, G.; Yerko, V.; Yang, J.; Bittar, T.; Quessy, F.; Golden, S.A.; Navarro, L.; Checknita, D.; et al. Regulation of impulsive and aggressive behaviours by a novel lncRNA. Mol. Psychiatry 2021, 26, 3751–3764.
  135. Yu, Q.; Teixeira, C.M.; Mahadevia, D.; Huang, Y.; Balsam, D.; Mann, J.J.; Gingrich, J.A.; Ansorge, M.S. Dopamine and serotonin signaling during two sensitive developmental periods differentially impact adult aggressive and affective behaviors in mice. Mol. Psychiatry 2014, 19, 688–698.
  136. Godar, S.C.; Bortolato, M.; Castelli, M.P.; Casti, A.; Casu, A.; Chen, K.; Ennas, M.G.; Tambaro, S.; Shih, J.C. The aggression and behavioral abnormalities associated with monoamine oxidase A deficiency are rescued by acute inhibition of serotonin reuptake. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2014, 56, 1–9.
  137. Smeijers, D.; Bulten, E.; Franke, B.; Buitelaar, J.; Verkes, R.-J. Associations of multiple trauma types and MAOA with severe aggressive behavior and MAOA effects on training outcome. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020, 30, 66–74.
  138. Martínez, R.M.; Liao, T.-T.; Fan, Y.-T.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chen, C. Interaction effects of the 5-HTT and MAOA-uVNTR gene variants on pre-attentive EEG activity in response to threatening voices. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 340.
  139. Kuepper, Y.; Grant, P.; Wielpuetz, C.; Hennig, J. MAOA-uVNTR genotype predicts interindividual differences in experimental aggressiveness as a function of the degree of provocation. Behav. Brain Res. 2013, 247, 73–78.
  140. Kolla, N.J.; Patel, R.; Meyer, J.H.; Chakravarty, M.M. Association of monoamine oxidase-A genetic variants and amygdala morphology in violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder and high psychopathic traits. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9607.
  141. Stetler, D.A.; Davis, C.; Leavitt, K.; Schriger, I.; Benson, K.; Bhakta, S.; Wang, L.C.; Oben, C.; Watters, M.; Haghnegahdar, T.; et al. Association of low-activity MAOA allelic variants with violent crime in incarcerated offenders. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2014, 58, 69–75.
  142. Zhang, Y.; Ming, Q.; Wang, X.; Yao, S. The interactive effect of the MAOA-VNTR genotype and childhood abuse on aggressive behaviors in Chinese male adolescents. Psychiatr. Genet. 2016, 26, 117–123.
  143. Holz, N.; Boecker, R.; Buchmann, A.F.; Blomeyer, D.; Baumeister, S.; Hohmann, S.; Jennen-Steinmetz, C.; Wolf, I.; Rietschel, M.; Witt, S.H.; et al. Evidence for a Sex-Dependent MAOA× Childhood Stress Interaction in the Neural Circuitry of Aggression. Cereb. Cortex 2016, 26, 904–914.
  144. Gorodetsky, E.; Bevilacqua, L.; Carli, V.; Sarchiapone, M.; Roy, A.; Goldman, D.; Enoch, M.-A. The interactive effect of MAOA-LPR genotype and childhood physical neglect on aggressive behaviors in Italian male prisoners. Genes Brain Behav. 2014, 13, 543–549.
  145. Zhang, Y.; Ming, Q.-S.; Yi, J.-Y.; Wang, X.; Chai, Q.-L.; Yao, S.-Q. Gene-Gene-Environment Interactions of Serotonin Transporter, Monoamine Oxidase A and Childhood Maltreatment Predict Aggressive Behavior in Chinese Adolescents. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 17.
  146. Kant, T.; Koyama, E.; Zai, C.C.; Beitchman, J.H.; Kennedy, J.L. COMT Val/Met and Psychopathic Traits in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and New Evidence of a Developmental Trajectory toward Psychopathy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1782.
  147. Gutleb, D.R.; Roos, C.; Noll, A.; Ostner, J.; Schülke, O. COMT Val158 Met moderates the link between rank and aggression in a non-human primate. Genes Brain Behav. 2018, 17, e12443.
  148. Hygen, B.W.; Belsky, J.; Stenseng, F.; Lydersen, S.; Guzey, I.C.; Wichstrøm, L. Child exposure to serious life events, COMT, and aggression: Testing differential susceptibility theory. Dev. Psychol. 2015, 51, 1098–1104.
  149. van Goozen, S.H.M.; Langley, K.; Northover, C.; Hubble, K.; Rubia, K.; Schepman, K.; O’Donovan, M.C.; Thapar, A. Identifying mechanisms that underlie links between COMT genotype and aggression in male adolescents with ADHD. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2016, 57, 472–480.
  150. Tuvblad, C.; Narusyte, J.; Comasco, E.; Andershed, H.; Andershed, A.-K.; Colins, O.F.; Fanti, K.A.; Nilsson, K.W. Physical and verbal aggressive behavior and COMT genotype: Sensitivity to the environment. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2016, 171, 708–718.
  151. Fritz, M.; Rösel, F.; Dobler, H.; Streb, J.; Dudeck, M. Childhood Trauma, the Combination of MAO-A and COMT Genetic Polymorphisms and the Joy of Being Aggressive in Forensic Psychiatric Patients. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 1008.
  152. Nordman, J.C. Anger management: Mechanisms of glutamate receptor-mediated synaptic plasticity underlying animal aggression. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2022, 142, 106120.
  153. Vekovischeva, O.Y.; Aitta-Aho, T.; Echenko, O.; Kankaanpää, A.; Seppälä, T.; Honkanen, A.; Sprengel, R.; Korpi, E.R. Reduced aggression in AMPA-type glutamate receptor GluR-A subunit-deficient mice. Genes Brain Behav. 2004, 3, 253–265.
  154. Araki, R.; Ago, Y.; Hasebe, S.; Nishiyama, S.; Tanaka, T.; Oka, S.; Takuma, K.; Matsuda, T. Involvement of prefrontal AMPA receptors in encounter stimulation-induced hyperactivity in isolation-reared mice. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014, 17, 883–893.
  155. Shimizu, K.; Kurosawa, N.; Seki, K. The role of the AMPA receptor and 5-HT(3) receptor on aggressive behavior and depressive-like symptoms in chronic social isolation-reared mice. Physiol. Behav. 2016, 153, 70–83.
  156. Zha, X.; Wang, L.; Jiao, Z.-L.; Yang, R.-R.; Xu, C.; Xu, X.-H. VMHvl-Projecting Vglut1+ Neurons in the Posterior Amygdala Gate Territorial Aggression. Cell Rep. 2020, 31, 107517.
  157. Shin, S.Y.; Baek, N.J.; Han, S.H.; Min, S.S. Chronic administration of ketamine ameliorates the anxiety- and aggressive-like behavior in adolescent mice induced by neonatal maternal separation. Korean J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2019, 23, 81–87.
  158. Chang, C.-H.; Su, C.-L.; Gean, P.-W. Mechanism underlying NMDA blockade-induced inhibition of aggression in post-weaning socially isolated mice. Neuropharmacology 2018, 143, 95–105.
  159. Frau, R.; Pardu, A.; Godar, S.; Bini, V.; Bortolato, M. Combined Antagonism of 5-HT2 and NMDA Receptors Reduces the Aggression of Monoamine Oxidase a Knockout Mice. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 213.
  160. Halene, T.B.; Ehrlichman, R.S.; Liang, Y.; Christian, E.P.; Jonak, G.J.; Gur, T.L.; Blendy, J.A.; Dow, H.C.; Brodkin, E.S.; Schneider, F.; et al. Assessment of NMDA receptor NR1 subunit hypofunction in mice as a model for schizophrenia. Genes Brain Behav. 2009, 8, 661–675.
  161. Bacq, A.; Astori, S.; Gebara, E.; Tang, W.; Silva, B.A.; Sanchez-Mut, J.; Grosse, J.; Guillot de Suduiraut, I.; Zanoletti, O.; Maclachlan, C.; et al. Amygdala GluN2B-NMDAR dysfunction is critical in abnormal aggression of neurodevelopmental origin induced by St8sia2 deficiency. Mol. Psychiatry 2020, 25, 2144–2161.
  162. Navarro, J.F.; Postigo, D.; Martín, M.; Burón, E. Antiaggressive effects of MPEP, a selective antagonist of mGlu5 receptors, in agonistic interactions between male mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 551, 67–70.
  163. Been, L.E.; Moore, K.M.; Kennedy, B.C.; Meisel, R.L. Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor and Fragile X Signaling in a Female Model of Escalated Aggression. Biol. Psychiatry 2016, 79, 685–692.
  164. Barbano, M.F.; Wang, H.-L.; Zhang, S.; Miranda-Barrientos, J.; Estrin, D.J.; Figueroa-González, A.; Liu, B.; Barker, D.J.; Morales, M. VTA Glutamatergic Neurons Mediate Innate Defensive Behaviors. Neuron 2020, 107, 368–382.e8.
  165. Craig, M.C.; Mulder, L.M.; Zwiers, M.P.; Sethi, A.; Hoekstra, P.J.; Dietrich, A.; Baumeister, S.; Aggensteiner, P.M.; Banaschewski, T.; Brandeis, D.; et al. Distinct associations between fronto-striatal glutamate concentrations and callous-unemotional traits and proactive aggression in disruptive behavior. Cortex 2019, 121, 135–146.
  166. Smaragdi, A.; Chavez, S.; Lobaugh, N.J.; Meyer, J.H.; Kolla, N.J. Differential levels of prefrontal cortex glutamate+glutamine in adults with antisocial personality disorder and bipolar disorder: A proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2019, 93, 250–255.
  167. Ende, G.; Cackowski, S.; van Eijk, J.; Sack, M.; Demirakca, T.; Kleindienst, N.; Bohus, M.; Sobanski, E.; Krause-Utz, A.; Schmahl, C. Impulsivity and Aggression in Female BPD and ADHD Patients: Association with ACC Glutamate and GABA Concentrations. Neuropsychopharmacology 2016, 41, 410–418.
  168. Frangaj, A.; Fan, Q.R. Structural biology of GABAB receptor. Neuropharmacology 2018, 136, 68–79.
  169. Olsen, R.W.; Tobin, A.J. Molecular biology of GABAA receptors. FASEB J. 1990, 4, 1469–1480.
  170. Narvaes, R.; Martins de Almeida, R.M. Aggressive behavior and three neurotransmitters: Dopamine, GABA, and serotonin—A review of the last 10 years. Psychol. Neurosci. 2014, 7, 601–607.
  171. Jager, A.; Amiri, H.; Bielczyk, N.; van Heukelum, S.; Heerschap, A.; Aschrafi, A.; Poelmans, G.; Buitelaar, J.K.; Kozicz, T.; Glennon, J.C. Cortical control of aggression: GABA signalling in the anterior cingulate cortex. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020, 30, 5–16.
  172. Chaibi, I.; Bennis, M.; Ba-M’Hamed, S. GABA-A receptor signaling in the anterior cingulate cortex modulates aggression and anxiety-related behaviors in socially isolated mice. Brain Res. 2021, 1762, 147440.
  173. McDonald, M.M.; Markham, C.M.; Norvelle, A.; Albers, H.E.; Huhman, K.L. GABAA receptor activation in the lateral septum reduces the expression of conditioned defeat and increases aggression in Syrian hamsters. Brain Res. 2012, 1439, 27–33.
  174. Borland, J.M.; Walton, J.C.; Norvelle, A.; Grantham, K.N.; Aiani, L.M.; Larkin, T.E.; McCann, K.E.; Albers, H.E. Social experience and sex-dependent regulation of aggression in the lateral septum by extrasynaptic δGABAA receptors. Psychopharmacology 2020, 237, 329–344.
  175. Newman, E.L.; Smith, K.S.; Takahashi, A.; Chu, A.; Hwa, L.S.; Chen, Y.; DeBold, J.F.; Rudolph, U.; Miczek, K.A. α2-containing GABA(A) receptors: A requirement for midazolam-escalated aggression and social approach in mice. Psychopharmacology 2015, 232, 4359–4369.
  176. Hong, W.; Kim, D.-W.; Anderson, D.J. Antagonistic control of social versus repetitive self-grooming behaviors by separable amygdala neuronal subsets. Cell 2014, 158, 1348–1361.
  177. Baleisyte, A.; Schneggenburger, R.; Kochubey, O. Stimulation of medial amygdala GABA neurons with kinetically different channelrhodopsins yields opposite behavioral outcomes. Cell Rep. 2022, 39, 110850.
  178. Gulsun, M.; Oznur, T.; Aydemir, E.; Ozcelik, F.; Erdem, M.; Zincir, S.; Akgul, O.; Kurt, Y. Possible relationship between amino acids, aggression and psychopathy. Int. J. Psychiatry Clin. Pract. 2016, 20, 91–100.
  179. Kiive, E.; Laas, K.; Vaht, M.; Veidebaum, T.; Harro, J. Stressful life events increase aggression and alcohol use in young carriers of the GABRA2 rs279826/rs279858 A-allele. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017, 27, 816–827.
  180. Miller, A.H.; Haroon, E.; Raison, C.L.; Felger, J.C. Cytokine targets in the brain: Impact on neurotransmitters and neurocircuits. Depress. Anxiety 2013, 30, 297–306.
  181. Klawonn, A.M.; Fritz, M.; Castany, S.; Pignatelli, M.; Canal, C.; Similä, F.; Tejeda, H.A.; Levinsson, J.; Jaarola, M.; Jakobsson, J.; et al. Microglial activation elicits a negative affective state through prostaglandin-mediated modulation of striatal neurons. Immunity 2021, 54, 225–234.e6.
  182. Hassanain, M.; Zalcman, S.; Bhatt, S.; Siegel, A. Interleukin-1 beta in the hypothalamus potentiates feline defensive rage: Role of serotonin-2 receptors. Neuroscience 2003, 120, 227–233.
  183. Hassanain, M.; Bhatt, S.; Zalcman, S.; Siegel, A. Potentiating role of interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) and IL-1beta type 1 receptors in the medial hypothalamus in defensive rage behavior in the cat. Brain Res. 2005, 1048, 1–11.
  184. Bhatt, S.; Bhatt, R.; Zalcman, S.S.; Siegel, A. Role of IL-1 beta and 5-HT2 receptors in midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) in potentiating defensive rage behavior in cat. Brain Behav. Immun. 2008, 22, 224–233.
  185. Patel, A.; Siegel, A.; Zalcman, S.S. Lack of aggression and anxiolytic-like behavior in TNF receptor (TNF-R1 and TNF-R2) deficient mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 2010, 24, 1276–1280.
  186. Takahashi, A.; Aleyasin, H.; Stavarache, M.A.; Li, L.; Cathomas, F.; Parise, L.F.; Lin, H.-Y.; Burnett, C.J.; Aubry, A.; Flanigan, M.E.; et al. Neuromodulatory effect of interleukin 1β in the dorsal raphe nucleus on individual differences in aggression. Mol. Psychiatry 2022, 27, 2563–2579.
  187. Alperina, E.; Idova, G.; Zhukova, E.; Zhanaeva, S.; Kozhemyakina, R. Cytokine variations within brain structures in rats selected for differences in aggression. Neurosci. Lett. 2019, 692, 193–198.
  188. Coccaro, E.F.; Lee, R.; Coussons-Read, M. Elevated plasma inflammatory markers in individuals with intermittent explosive disorder and correlation with aggression in humans. JAMA Psychiatry 2014, 71, 158–165.
  189. Coccaro, E.F.; Lee, R.; Coussons-Read, M. Cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory cytokines and aggression in personality disordered subjects. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015, 18, pyv001.
  190. Provençal, N.; Suderman, M.J.; Vitaro, F.; Szyf, M.; Tremblay, R.E. Childhood chronic physical aggression associates with adult cytokine levels in plasma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69481.
  191. Pouget, J.G.; Bryushkova, L.; Koyama, E.; Zai, C.C.; Fonseka, T.M.; Mueller, D.; Kennedy, J.L.; Beitchman, J.H. Exploring the association of interleukin polymorphisms with aggression and internalizing behaviors in children and adolescents. Brain Behav. 2022, 12, e2753.
  192. Miller, G.M.; Bendor, J.; Tiefenbacher, S.; Yang, H.; Novak, M.A.; Madras, B.K. A mu-opioid receptor single nucleotide polymorphism in rhesus monkey: Association with stress response and aggression. Mol. Psychiatry 2004, 9, 99–108.
  193. Driscoll, C.A.; Lindell, S.G.; Schwandt, M.L.; Suomi, S.J.; Higley, J.D.; Heilig, M.; Barr, C.S. OPRM1 genotype interacts with serotonin system dysfunction to predict alcohol-heightened aggression in primates. Addict. Biol. 2017, 22, 1655–1664.
  194. Farah Naquiah, M.Z.; James, R.J.; Suratman, S.; Lee, L.S.; Mohd Hafidz, M.I.; Salleh, M.Z.; Teh, L.K. Transgenerational effects of paternal heroin addiction on anxiety and aggression behavior in male offspring. Behav. Brain Funct. 2016, 12, 23.
  195. Weidler, C.; Wagels, L.; Regenbogen, C.; Hofhansel, L.; Blendy, J.A.; Clemens, B.; Montag, C.; Habel, U. The influence of the OPRM1 (A118G) polymorphism on behavioral and neural correlates of aggression in healthy males. Neuropharmacology 2019, 156, 107467.
  196. Cimino, S.; Carola, V.; Cerniglia, L.; Bussone, S.; Bevilacqua, A.; Tambelli, R. The μ-opioid receptor gene A118G polymorphism is associated with insecure attachment in children with disruptive mood regulation disorder and their mothers. Brain Behav. 2020, 10, e01659.
  197. Flanigan, M.E.; Aleyasin, H.; Li, L.; Burnett, C.J.; Chan, K.L.; LeClair, K.B.; Lucas, E.K.; Matikainen-Ankney, B.; Durand-de Cuttoli, R.; Takahashi, A.; et al. Orexin signaling in GABAergic lateral habenula neurons modulates aggressive behavior in male mice. Nat. Neurosci. 2020, 23, 638–650.
  198. Flanigan, M.; Aleyasin, H.; Takahashi, A.; Golden, S.A.; Russo, S.J. An emerging role for the lateral habenula in aggressive behavior. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2017, 162, 79–86.
  199. Harro, J.; Laas, K.; Eensoo, D.; Kurrikoff, T.; Sakala, K.; Vaht, M.; Parik, J.; Mäestu, J.; Veidebaum, T. Orexin/hypocretin receptor gene (HCRTR1) variation is associated with aggressive behaviour. Neuropharmacology 2019, 156, 107527.
  200. Pulver, A.; Kiive, E.; Kanarik, M.; Harro, J. Association of orexin/hypocretin receptor gene (HCRTR1) with reward sensitivity, and interaction with gender. Brain Res. 2020, 1746, 147013.
  201. Ferretti, V.; Maltese, F.; Contarini, G.; Nigro, M.; Bonavia, A.; Huang, H.; Gigliucci, V.; Morelli, G.; Scheggia, D.; Managò, F.; et al. Oxytocin Signaling in the Central Amygdala Modulates Emotion Discrimination in Mice. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, 1938–1953.e6.
  202. Song, Z.; Albers, H.E. Cross-talk among oxytocin and arginine-vasopressin receptors: Relevance for basic and clinical studies of the brain and periphery. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2018, 51, 14–24.
  203. Froemke, R.C.; Young, L.J. Oxytocin, Neural Plasticity, and Social Behavior. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2021, 44, 359–381.
  204. Haller, J. The neurobiology of abnormal manifestations of aggression—A review of hypothalamic mechanisms in cats, rodents, and humans. Brain Res. Bull. 2013, 93, 97–109.
  205. Beiderbeck, D.I.; Neumann, I.D.; Veenema, A.H. Differences in intermale aggression are accompanied by opposite vasopressin release patterns within the septum in rats bred for low and high anxiety. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007, 26, 3597–3605.
  206. Carrillo, M.; Ricci, L.A.; Melloni, R.H. Glutamate-vasopressin interactions and the neurobiology of anabolic steroid-induced offensive aggression. Neuroscience 2011, 185, 85–96.
  207. Wersinger, S.R.; Ginns, E.I.; O’Carroll, A.-M.; Lolait, S.J.; Young, W.S. Vasopressin V1b receptor knockout reduces aggressive behavior in male mice. Mol. Psychiatry 2002, 7, 975–984.
  208. Jurek, B.; Neumann, I.D. The Oxytocin Receptor: From Intracellular Signaling to Behavior. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 1805–1908.
  209. Oliveira, V.E.d.M.; Lukas, M.; Wolf, H.N.; Durante, E.; Lorenz, A.; Mayer, A.-L.; Bludau, A.; Bosch, O.J.; Grinevich, V.; Egger, V.; et al. Oxytocin and vasopressin within the ventral and dorsal lateral septum modulate aggression in female rats. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2900.
  210. Tan, O.; Musullulu, H.; Raymond, J.S.; Wilson, B.; Langguth, M.; Bowen, M.T. Oxytocin and vasopressin inhibit hyper-aggressive behaviour in socially isolated mice. Neuropharmacology 2019, 156, 107573.
  211. Kawada, A.; Nagasawa, M.; Murata, A.; Mogi, K.; Watanabe, K.; Kikusui, T.; Kameda, T. Vasopressin enhances human preemptive strike in both males and females. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9664.
  212. Akkoc Altinok, D.C.; Votinov, M.; Henzelmann, F.; Jo, H.; Eisert, A.; Habel, U.; Wagels, L. A Combined Administration of Testosterone and Arginine Vasopressin Affects Aggressive Behavior in Males. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 1623.
  213. Brunnlieb, C.; Münte, T.F.; Krämer, U.; Tempelmann, C.; Heldmann, M. Vasopressin modulates neural responses during human reactive aggression. Soc. Neurosci. 2013, 8, 148–164.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Subjects: Biology
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register :
Michael Fritz
,
Sarah-Maria Soravia
,
Manuela Dudeck
,
Layal Malli
,
Marc Fakhoury
View Times: 539
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 17 Apr 2023
Table of Contents
    1000/1000
    Hot Most Recent
    Video Production Service
    Feedback