You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic. For video creation, please contact our Academic Video Service.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 2658 2023-04-07 16:59:13 |
2 update references and layout -5 word(s) 2653 2023-04-10 04:02:12 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Academic Video Service to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Yes No
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Sirangelo, T.M.; Ludlow, R.A.; Chenet, T.; Pasti, L.; Spadafora, N.D. Plant Cell Walls to Improve Biomass Quality. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/42873 (accessed on 10 July 2025).
Sirangelo TM, Ludlow RA, Chenet T, Pasti L, Spadafora ND. Plant Cell Walls to Improve Biomass Quality. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/42873. Accessed July 10, 2025.
Sirangelo, Tiziana Maria, Richard Andrew Ludlow, Tatiana Chenet, Luisa Pasti, Natasha Damiana Spadafora. "Plant Cell Walls to Improve Biomass Quality" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/42873 (accessed July 10, 2025).
Sirangelo, T.M., Ludlow, R.A., Chenet, T., Pasti, L., & Spadafora, N.D. (2023, April 07). Plant Cell Walls to Improve Biomass Quality. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/42873
Sirangelo, Tiziana Maria, et al. "Plant Cell Walls to Improve Biomass Quality." Encyclopedia. Web. 07 April, 2023.
Plant Cell Walls to Improve Biomass Quality
Edit

Biomass is one of the most important sources of renewable energy and plays an important role in reducing our reliance on fossil fuels. Efficient biomass production is essential to obtain large amounts of sustainable energy with minimal environmental cost.

energy crops genome editing genomics

1. Introduction

The global increase in the price of fossil fuels and the need to decrease carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and achieve energy security have increased the importance of using biomass for energy production [1]. Biomass is a renewable, abundant, and easily generated source of energy, and it contributes to decrease the level of greenhouse gases in the environment [2]. Biomass can be directly used as a source of energy, or it can be converted into biofuels in order to increase the efficiency of energy production or to facilitate transport and storage. However, careful consideration must be given to the source of biofuels, as the greatest environmental benefits can be achieved by using waste products and land that is too poor to grow food crops on [2].
In industrialized countries, the economic importance of bioenergy has been recognized for many years, and several initiatives, such as the “Biomass Action Plan” and the “Multi-Year Plan”, have been undertaken [3]. The former plan highlighted the need of reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, according to the Kyoto Protocol regulations. The latter details how agricultural and energy policies are handled among different countries by identifying, in research and development and market behaviors, the strategic activities that are required to meet the energy and sustainability challenges [4]. Effective biomass conversion into tangible energy products is a critical key factor to facilitate sustainable development and to obtain ecological and socio-economic benefits. Further research is required in order to develop biorefining technologies for an efficient utilization of these resources. To make this possible, it is necessary to have a thorough understanding of the biochemical and molecular processes in both the synthesis and the degradation of major biomass components.
The composition of biomass is extremely diverse, varying widely and depending on the species of plant and the tissue from which it is harvested. Broadly speaking, plant biomass predominantly consists of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin [5]. These are the main components of secondary cell walls (SCWs), which give plant cells their structural integrity (the lignocellulosic component). SCWs are strong, rigid, thick cell walls that are deposited after cell expansion in the sclerenchyma. Most SCWs are associated with woody tissue and constitute the major source of plant biomass [5]. Cellulose and hemicellulose make up wood fibers, and lignin binds them together, providing rigidity [6]. Therefore, the extraction of the cellulose from the plant requires the lignin to be broken down first. Lignin is insoluble in acids and is resistant to bacterial degradation, as it has very low biomass digestibility. Therefore, the extraction process may require complex methods, which are chosen according to the type of lignin [7]. It can include biological approaches, aimed to depolymerize lignin through enzymatic oxidation, or microbial conversion by using bacteria that are involved in wood decomposition, or fungi belonging to white-rot fungi or brown-rot fungi groups [7][8]. However, given the high availability of lignin in nature and its production worldwide, which reaches 70 million tons per year, innovative technologies for lignin decomposition are still being investigated [9].

2. Cell-Wall-Related Molecular Investigations

The analysis and identification of cell-wall-related genes and enzymes is a convenient approach to study the role of cell wall components in bioenergy crops. The main gene families that are explored in biomass investigations are those that are involved in the processes of cell wall biosynthesis, growth, development, and degradation.
Cell wall biosynthesis involves large enzyme families, characterizing the different cell wall components. Specifically, cellulose synthase (CESA) complexes consist of proteins that are involved in the synthesis of cellulose [10]. CESAs are located in the plasma membrane and synthesize cellulose in three steps, beginning with the initiation of the β-1,4-glucan chain, followed by an elongation phase, and then the termination of the polymer chain [11]. The CESA gene family has been characterized in several plant species used for biofuels including rice and barley [12][13].
Hemicellulose biosynthesis mechanisms are still poorly understood, but researcher's understanding has improved after the application of genetic approaches. For instance, it has been reported that the hemicellulose polysaccharides named mannans are synthesized from guanosine diphosphate mannose (GDP-mannose), guanosine 5′-diphosphoglucose (GDP-glucose), and uridine diphosphate galactose (UDP-galactose) [14]. These activated nucleotide sugars are then utilized by highly specific glycosyltransferases (GTs), which allows the synthesis of the polymer.
The enzymes that are involved in callose biosynthesis and hydrolysis include the 1,3-β-glucan synthases and the 1,3-β-glucan hydrolases, respectively. These enzymes have historically been associated with pathogen response, cell division, and plant reproduction [15].
Lignin is produced by the phenylalanine/tyrosine metabolic pathway in plant cells. In this phenylpropanoid pathway, three enzymes, namely, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H), and 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL), catalyze the initial steps to provide the precursors for all of the downstream metabolites [16]. Other phenylpropanoid enzymes, such as quinate/shikimate p-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (HCT), p-coumaroylshikimate 3′-hydroxylase (C3H), caffeoyl shikimate esterase (CSE), caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (COMT), and caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT), working downstream of 4CL, are also essential for lignin biosynthesis [17]. In addition to these enzymes, others that are specific for lignin biosynthesis have been identified, including cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR), ferulate 5-hydroxylase (F5H), and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) [16]. After biosynthesis and transport, lignin is generally polymerized by the enzymes peroxidase (POD) and laccase (LAC) in the secondary cell walls with three types of monolignols, namely sinapyl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol, and p-coumaryl alcohol [16].
Cell wall growth and development incorporate large families of enzymes, including glycosyltransferases (GTs), glycosylhydrolases (GHs), methyltransferases, and acetylesterases, part of the carbohydrate active enzymes, or CAZymes, classified in the CAZy database [18]. Despite their importance, many CAZy genes are still uncharacterized [18]. Furthermore, the cellulose-synthase-like (Csl) gene superfamily appears to be crucial in regulating β-glucan synthesis during plant development [19]. For instance, the CslF6 gene is expressed in many plant tissues during development [20]. However, further investigation is necessary in order to define the precise role of 1,3;1,4-β-glucan and the CslF gene family in cell wall composition.
Other factors influencing plant development are the wall-associated kinases (WAKs), which are required for cell wall expansion, as shown in Arabidopsis, where leaves expressing an antisense WAK transcript have lower WAK protein levels and show a loss of cell expansion [21].
The ERULUS (ERU) protein, which is part of the FERONIA (FER) kinase family, is required for correct root hair formation and regulates cell wall composition through the negative control of pectin methylesterase (PME) activity [18]. Interestingly, ERU transcription is downregulated in several mutants showing pectin-related changes in cell wall composition. This trend suggests the existence of a feedback mechanism from the wall itself to regulate pectin composition [18].
The endogenous degradation process of the cell wall involves several enzymes. It is a step-by-step reaction that starts with the expansion and subsequent separation of cells in which pectins are targeted, followed by hydrolysis of the cell wall components, and degradation of hemicellulose and cellulose [22]. Among the enzymes that are involved in cell wall degradation, there are members of the glycoside hydrolase 9 (GH9) family, the endo-β-1,4-glucanases, which cleave the β-1,4-glycosidic bonds with monomers of glucose, contributing to the cellulose deconstruction. Furthermore, GH10 and GH11 xylanase genes are also known to control the hemicellulose degradation [23]. Therefore, by overexpressing these key enzymes, it may be possible to modify the cell wall structure of energy crops and thus to drive improvements in the technologies for biofuel production.

3. Gene Editing Approaches to Improve Biomass Quality

The design of genetically modified plants to synthetize less recalcitrant cell walls has been applied to improve biomass saccharification. Recently, genetic engineering approaches have been applied to modify the genes that are involved in the cell wall structure [24]. The modification of the cell wall composition by downregulating or knocking-out the lignin biosynthetic genes, or by acting on related transcription factor mechanisms, has been attempted with the aim of reducing lignin content [25]. However, the success rate of these approaches was limited, due to undesirable traits in plants with mutations in lignin biosynthesis, such as reduced biomass yields, low germination frequency, decreased height, and increased sensitivity to pathogens [25].
Gene overexpression is another approach that is applied to enhance a target trait. For instance, glycoside hydrolase (GH) overexpression increased the accessibility of polysaccharides [26]. Furthermore, changes in the pectin content, and/or its modification pattern, led to an increased saccharification, and in several crops the overexpression of plant pectinases led to an increased release of simple sugars [27].
However, overexpressing or mutating just a single gene to decrease the lignin content does not necessarily promote saccharification [25]. Since these processes involve several cell wall modifications, a decreased recalcitrance can arguably be obtained as a result of an enhanced and optimized modification of the entire catabolic pathway. Therefore, a proper understanding of the metabolic pathways and the genetic mechanisms through a combination of different omics analyses can be essential for gene editing success.
To this respect, the modification of lignocellulosic biomass was carried out with bioengineering technologies [28], such as gene silencing methods, for entire gene family members [29], or the latest genome editing methods based on targeted gene manipulation, such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated (Cas) systems [30]. In metabolic engineering, this tool allowed an easier discovery and evaluation of the relevant genes and pathways and has become the first choice for the genetic improvement of many organisms, including industrially relevant ones [30].
CRISPR-based methods were applied successfully in several woody plants to effectively alter the lignocellulosic composition in order to facilitate the extractability of its components, including sugar, and to improve the pulping quality [31].

Gene Editing in Energy Crops

The CRISPR/Cas9 approach was tested in the woody perennial poplar by editing three 4-coumarate:CoA ligase targeted genes (4CL1, 4CL2, and 4CL5), focusing on lignin and flavonoid biosynthesis [32]. The results showed that mutations in the 4CL1 gene slow down the lignification process, and mutagenesis in the 4CL2 gene lead to an overall 20% decrease in lignin content, indicating that 4CL1 and 4CL2 can play a primary role in this biosynthesis pathway. In addition, a CRISPR-based application was carried out in poplar to decrease the lignin content by targeting the PtoMYB156 transcription factor [33]. MYB156 knock-out in poplar resulted in the deposition of lignin, xylan, and cellulose during SCW formation, showing how this gene may repress phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and how it negatively regulates SCW development [33]. Despite the negative effects on plant growth, this provided useful directions for future research.
Regardless of the advances in plant genomics, a crucial limitation to the genetic improvement of some bioenergy crops is still the complexity of their genomes, which slows down the use of modern breeding approaches.
O. sativa has a compact diploid genome [34] of approximately 500 Mb and several gene editing investigations have been carried out on this crop. Here, researchers report one of the most significant studies [35], in which the C3H transcription factor knockdown mutant led to an altered lignin composition that resulted in enriched p-hydroxyphenyl components, with a strong reduction in cell wall cross-linking ferulates. Such structural alterations led to an important discovery: the reduction in cell wall recalcitrance and enhanced biomass saccharification [35].
In Panicum virgatum, its allotetraploid genome (2n = 4x = 36) represented an impediment to generate homozygous knock-out plants. However, in one study [36], the development of genome-editing technologies made it possible to successfully apply the CRISPR/Cas9 method. This technique was used to mutate a key gene involved in the lignin biosynthesis, the Pv4CL1 gene, which was selected as the gene target because of its preferential expression in highly lignified stem tissues. The results showed less lignin and significantly higher glucose and xylose content in the knock-out plants compared to the wild type.
Recently, pioneering efforts have been made to genetically modify Arundo donax L. [37], an energy crop that is able to grow under resilient conditions that is characterized by a complex genome. Since this crop is polyploid, it is very difficult to induce and select trait promising mutations. No transgenic A. donax crops with improved biomass characteristics have been developed yet. However, by investigating the lignin biosynthetic pathway of A. donax, a high copy number of PAL and C4H genes were found giving target genes for A. donax biomass quality improvement [38].
Increasing cellulose biosynthesis is another important aim in biomass improvement because cellulose entirely consists of C6 sugar glucose, which is useful for saccharification. Therefore, the overexpression of cellulose synthase genes (CESAs) is often used to obtain transgenic plants that are enriched in cellulose [31]. However, attempts to overexpress CESAs in secondary cell walls of aspen and barley have resulted in decreased cellulose content and reduced plant growth [39].
Recently, the cellulose biosynthesis CESA gene family was manipulated to increase the cellulose production in poplar. Transgenic plants were obtained by overexpressing the PmCesA2 gene from Pinus massoniana through an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation [40]. The transgenic poplar showed an enhanced growth performance and an improved cellulose production, but also an increase in lignin content, due to changes in the cell wall polysaccharide composition.
Other studies have focused on the overexpression of genes belonging to the sucrose synthase (SUS) gene family, observing a general increased plant growth and cellulose and starch content [41]. For instance, in hybrid poplar (Populus alba × grandidentata), a small increase in cellulose was found, as well as an increase in cellulose crystallinity, which contributes to increase biomass recalcitrance [42]; however, in tobacco, such findings led to ~20% thicker cell walls, 18% more cellulose, and 9–11% less cellulose crystallinity [43].
In 2020, the COBRA-like gene, which is important for cellulose biosynthesis, has been proposed as a possible target for creating transgenic plants that are rich in cellulose [31]. The GhCOBL9A, a COBRA-like gene from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) that is overexpressed in Arabidopsis, led to a notable increase in the total biomass and cellulose content (59%). Furthermore, the CESA gene expression of the transgenic plants measured in the SCW showed a significant increase, suggesting the involvement of a COBRA-like gene in the CESA pathway of the transgenic Arabidopsis [44]. The cell walls of cotton fibers almost entirely consist of cellulose and are an interesting model for high-level cellulose production. The approach that was adopted in this study could be a great strategy to increase the cellulose content in bioenergy crops.
Furthermore, a gene that is not directly involved in cellulose biosynthesis has been demonstrated to influence its content. Particularly, the overexpression of the rice OsMYB103L gene, encoding the R2R3-MYB transcription factor and controlling leaf development, caused a rise in the expression of CESA genes and an increase in cellulose content [45]. Conversely, knocking down this gene led to a lower expression of CESA genes.
Several investigations have focused on the reduction in C5 sugars, such as xylose, which form linkages with cell wall hemicelluloses [46]. Mutants in xylan biosynthesis have been generated, however, the complexity of the genome of several bioenergy crops has hindered gene editing studies. In Chen et al. [47], the inactivation of the rice OsIRX10 led to a decrease in xylan content in the cell walls and an improved biomass saccharification. Furthermore, the simultaneous knockdown expression of two glycosyltransferase genes (GAUT), PtGAUT12.1 and PtGAUT12.2, in P. deltoides has been shown to reduce the xylan content during wood formation and reduce the recalcitrance of cell walls [48].
Among the genome editing investigations looking at hemicellulose, researchers focus here on two particularly promising studies with regards to the improvement of biomass yield and quality. In the first study, the silencing of GH10 genes, which are known to control the hemicellulose degradation and are highly expressed during secondary wall deposition, led to alterations in the regulation of stress-responsive genes, releasing tensional stresses [49]. These changes could enhance primary growth and consequently result in an improved biomass yield. In the second study, endoglucanases genes from poplar (PtGH9B and PtGH9C) were expressed in Arabidopsis. The transgenic lines showed changes in the sugar content and differences in cell wall crystallinity compared to the wild type, suggesting that these endoglucanases impact secondary cell wall development by contributing to the cell wall crystallization process [50].

References

  1. Lauri, P.; Havlík, P.; Kindermann, G.; Forsell, N.; Böttcher, H.; Obersteiner, M. Woody biomass energy potential in 2050. Energy Policy 2014, 66, 19–31.
  2. Tkemaladze, G.S.; Makhashvili, K.A. Climate changes and photosynthesis. Ann. Agrar. Sci. 2016, 14, 119–126.
  3. Chum, H.; Faaij, A.; Moreira, J.; Berndes, G.; Dhamija, P.; Dong, H.; Gabrielle, B.; Goss Eng, A.; Lucht, W.; Mapako, M.; et al. IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation; Chapter 2; Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Matschoss, P., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., Eickemeier, P., Hansen, G., Schlömer, S., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011.
  4. Kaltschmitt, M. Renewable energy from biomass, Introduction. In Renewable Energy Systems; Kaltschmitt, M., Themelis, N.J., Bronicki, L.Y., Söder, L., Vega, L.A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
  5. Kumar, M.; Campbell, L.; Turner, S. Secondary cell walls: Biosynthesis and manipulation. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 515–531.
  6. Zhong, R.; Cui, D.; Ye, Z.H. Secondary cell wall biosynthesis. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 1703–1723.
  7. Welker, C.M.; Balasubramanian, V.K.; Petti, C.; Rai, K.M.; DeBolt, S.; Mendu, V. Engineering plant biomass lignin content and composition for biofuels and bioproducts. Energies 2015, 8, 7654–7676.
  8. Sanchez, C. Lignocellulosic residues: Biodegradation and bioconversion by fungi. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 185–194.
  9. Hodásová, L.; Jablonský, M.; Škulcová, A.; Ház, A. Lignin, potential products and their market value. Wood Res. 2015, 60, 973–986.
  10. Brabham, C.; DeBolt, S. Chemical genetics to examine cellulose biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 3, 309.
  11. Turner, S.; Kumar, M. Cellulose synthase complex organization and cellulose microfibril structure. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 2018, 376, 20170048.
  12. Tanaka, K.; Murata, K.; Yamazaki, M.; Onosato, K.; Miyao, A.; Hirochika, H. Three distinct rice cellulose synthase catalytic subunit genes required for cellulose synthesis in the secondary wall. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 73–83.
  13. Burton, R.A.; Shirley, N.J.; King, B.J.; Harvey, A.J.; Fincher, G.B. The CesA gene family of barley. Quantitative analysis of transcripts reveals two groups of co-expressed genes. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 224–236.
  14. Pauly, M.; Gille, S.; Liu, L.; Mansoori, N.; de Souza, A.; Schultink, A.; Xiong, G. Hemicellulose biosynthesis. Planta 2013, 238, 627–642.
  15. Piršelová, B.; Matušíková, I. Callose: The plant cell wall polysaccharide with multiple biological functions. Acta Physiol. Plant 2013, 35, 635–644.
  16. Liu, C.J.; Miao, Y.C.; Zhang, K.W. Sequestration and transport of lignin monomeric precursors. Molecules 2011, 16, 710–727.
  17. Barros, J.; Serk, H.; Granlund, I.; Pesquet, E. The cell biology of lignification in higher plants. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 1053–1074.
  18. Tucker, M.R.; Lou, H.; Aubert, M.K.; Wilkinson, L.G.; Little, A.; Houston, K.; Pinto, S.C.; Shirley, N.J. Exploring the Role of Cell Wall-Related Genes and Polysaccharides during Plant Development. Plants 2018, 7, 42.
  19. Nishantha, M.C.; Jeewani, D.C.; Xing, G.; Nie, X.; Weining, S. Genome-wide identification and analysis of the cslf gene family in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2020, 10, 122–126.
  20. Vega-Sanchez, M.E.; Verhertbruggen, Y.; Christensen, U.; Chen, X.W.; Sharma, V.; Varanasi, P.; Jobling, S.A.; Talbot, M.; White, R.G.; Joo, M.; et al. Loss of cellulose synthase-like f6 function affects mixed-linkage glucan deposition, cell wall mechanical properties, and defense responses in vegetative tissues of rice. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 56–69.
  21. Wagner, T.A.; Kohorn, B.D. Wall-associated kinases are expressed throughout plant development and are required for cell expansion. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 303–318.
  22. Rose, J.K.C. The Plant Cell wall. In Annual Plant Reviews; Blackwell Publishing: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2003; Volume 8.
  23. Gilbert, H.J. The Biochemistry and Structural Biology of Plant Cell Wall Deconstruction. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 444–455.
  24. Yadav, M.; Paritosh, K.; Chawade, A.; Pareek, N.; Vivekanand, V. Genetic Engineering of Energy Crops to Reduce Recalcitrance and Enhance Biomass Digestibility. Agriculture 2018, 8, 76.
  25. Miladinovic, D.; Antunes, D.; Yildirim, K.; Bakhsh, A.; Cvejić, S.; Kondić-Špika, A.; Marjanovic Jeromela, A.; Opsahl-Sorteberg, H.; Zambounis, A.; Hilioti, Z. Targeted plant improvement through genome editing: From laboratory to field. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 935–951.
  26. Biswal, A.K.; Soeno, K.; Gandla, M.L.; Immerzeel, P.; Pattathil, S.; Lucenius, J.; Serimaa, R.; Hahn, M.G.; Moritz, T.; Jönsson, L.J.; et al. Aspen pectatelyase PtxtPL1–27 mobilizes matrix polysaccharides from woody tissues and improves saccharification yield. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2014, 7, 11.
  27. Tavares, E.Q.P.; De Souza, A.P.; Buckeridge, M.S. How endogenous plant cell-wall degradation mechanisms can help achieve higher efficiency in saccharification of biomass. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 4133–4143.
  28. Yang, H.; Zhang, X.; Luo, H.; Liu, B.; Shiga, T.M.; Xi, L.; Kim, J.I.; Rubinelli, P.; Overton, J.C.; Subramanyam, V.; et al. Overcoming cellulose recalcitrance in woody biomass for the lignin-frst biorefnery. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 12, 171.
  29. Morgens, D.; Deans, R.; Li, A.; Bassik, M.S. Systematic comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 and RNAi screens for essential genes. Nat Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 634–636.
  30. Liu, X.; Wu, S.; Xu, J.; Sui, C.; Wei, J. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 in plant biology. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2017, 7, 292–302.
  31. Brandon, A.G.; Scheller, H.V. Engineering of Bioenergy Crops: Dominant Genetic Approaches to Improve Polysaccharide Properties and Composition in Biomass. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 282.
  32. Zhou, X.; Jacobs, T.B.; Xue, L.J.; Harding, S.A.; Tsai, C.J. Exploiting SNPs for biallelic CRISPR mutations in the outcrossing woody perennial Populus reveals 4-coumarate:CoA ligase specificity and redundancy. New Phytol. 2015, 208, 298–301.
  33. Yang, L.; Zhao, X.; Ran, L.; Li, C.; Fan, D.; Luo, K. PtoMYB156 is involved in negative regulation of phenylpropanoid metabolism and secondary cell wall biosynthesis during wood formation in poplar. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41209.
  34. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project. The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 2005, 436, 793–800.
  35. Takeda, Y.; Tobimatsu, Y.; Karlen, S.D.; Koshiba, T.; Suzuki, S.; Yamamura, M.; Murakami, S.; Mukai, M.; Hattori, T.; Osakabe, K.; et al. Downregulation of p-coumaroyl ester 3-hydroxylase in rice leads to altered cell wall structures and improves biomass saccharification. Plant J. 2018, 95, 796–811.
  36. Park, J.J.; Yoo, C.G.; Flanagan, A.; Pu, Y.; Debnath, S.; Ge, Y.; Ragauskas, A.J.; Wang, Z.Y. Defined tetra-allelic gene disruption of the 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase 1 (Pv4CL1) gene by CRISPR/Cas9 in switchgrass results in lignin reduction and improved sugar release. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017, 10, 284.
  37. Danelli, T.; Laura, M.; Savona, M.; Landoni, M.; Adani, F.; Pilu, R. Genetic Improvement of Arundo donax L.: Opportunities and Challenges. Plants 2020, 9, 1584.
  38. Evangelistella, C.; Valentini, A.; Ludovisi, R.; Firrincieli, A.; Fabbrini, F.; Scalabrin, S.; Cattonaro, F.; Morgante, M.; Mugnozza, G.S.; Keurentjes, J.J.B.; et al. De novo assembly, functional annotation, and analysis of the giant reed (Arundo donax L.) leaf transcriptome provide tools for the development of a biofuel feedstock. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017, 10, 138.
  39. Tan, H.-T.; Shirley, N.J.; Singh, R.R.; Henderson, M.; Dhugga, K.S.; Mayo, G.M.; Fincher, G.B.; Burton, R.A. Powerful regulatory systems and post-transcriptional gene silencing resist increases in cellulose content in cell walls of barley. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 62.
  40. Maleki, S.S.; Mohammadi, K.; Movahedi, A.; Wu, F.; Ji, K.S. Increase in Cell Wall Thickening and Biomass Production by Overexpression of PmCesA2 in Poplar. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 110.
  41. Stein, O.; Granot, D. An overview of sucrose synthases in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 95.
  42. Coleman, H.D.; Yan, J.; Mansfield, S.D. Sucrose synthase affects carbon partitioning to increase cellulose production and altered cell wall ultrastructure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 13118–13123.
  43. Li, M.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, M.; Liu, L.; Lu, T.; Wei, H.; Wei, Z. Overexpression of PsnSuSy1, 2 genes enhances secondary cell wall thickening, vegetative growth, and mechanical strength in transgenic tobacco. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 100, 215–230.
  44. Niu, E.; Shang, X.; Cheng, C.; Bao, J.; Zeng, Y.; Cai, C.; Du, X.; Guo, W. Comprehensive Analysis of the COBRA-Like (COBL) Gene Family in Gossypium Identifies Two COBLs Potentially Associated with Fiber Quality. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145725.
  45. Yang, C.H.; Li, D.Y.; Liu, X.; Ji, C.J.; Hao, L.L.; Zhao, X.F.; Li, X.B.; Chen, C.Y.; Cheng, Z.K.; Zhu, L.H. OsMYB103L, an R2R3MYB transcription factor, influences leaf rolling and mechanical strength in rice (Oryza sativa L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 158.
  46. Meents, M.J.; Watanabe, Y.; Samuels, A.L. The cell biology of secondary cell wall biosynthesis. Ann. Bot. 2018, 121, 1107–1125.
  47. Chen, X.W.; Vega-Sánchez, M.; Verhertbruggen, Y.; Chiniquy, D.; Canlas, P.E.; Fagerström, A.; Prak, L.; Christensen, U.; Oikawa, A.; Chern, M.; et al. Inactivation of OsIRX10 leads to decreased xylan content in rice culm cell walls and improved biomass saccharification. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 570–573.
  48. Biswal, A.K.; Hao, Z.Y.; Pattathil, S.; Yang, X.H.; Winkeler, K.; Collins, C.; Mohanty, S.S.; Richardson, E.A.; Gelineo-Albersheim, I.; Hunt, K.; et al. Downregulation of GAUT12 in Populus deltoides by RNA silencing results in reduced recalcitrance, increased growth and reduced xylan and pectin in a woody biofuel feedstock. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2015, 8, 41.
  49. Derba-Maceluch, M.; Awano, T.; Takahashi, J.; Lucenius, J.; Ratke, C.; Kontro, I.; Busse-Wicher, M.; Kosik, O.; Tanaka, R.; Winzéll, A.; et al. Suppression of xylan endotransglycosylase PtxtXyn10A affects cellulose microfibril angle in secondary wall in aspen wood. New Phytol. 2014, 205, 666–681.
  50. Glass, M.; Barkwill, S.; Unda, F.; Mansfield, S.D. Endo-beta-1,4-glucanases impact plant cell wall development by influencing cellulose crystallization. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2015, 57, 396–410.
More
Upload a video for this entry
Information
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , , ,
View Times: 511
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 10 Apr 2023
1000/1000
Hot Most Recent
Academic Video Service