Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 2510 2023-04-04 15:14:04 |
2 update references and layout Meta information modification 2510 2023-04-06 03:19:39 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Maghrabie, H.M.; Olabi, A.G.; Rezk, A.; Radwan, A.; Alami, A.H.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Water Desalination Systems Based on Renewable Energy Resources. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/42790 (accessed on 14 May 2024).
Maghrabie HM, Olabi AG, Rezk A, Radwan A, Alami AH, Abdelkareem MA. Water Desalination Systems Based on Renewable Energy Resources. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/42790. Accessed May 14, 2024.
Maghrabie, Hussein M., Abdul Ghani Olabi, Ahmed Rezk, Ali Radwan, Abdul Hai Alami, Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem. "Water Desalination Systems Based on Renewable Energy Resources" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/42790 (accessed May 14, 2024).
Maghrabie, H.M., Olabi, A.G., Rezk, A., Radwan, A., Alami, A.H., & Abdelkareem, M.A. (2023, April 04). Water Desalination Systems Based on Renewable Energy Resources. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/42790
Maghrabie, Hussein M., et al. "Water Desalination Systems Based on Renewable Energy Resources." Encyclopedia. Web. 04 April, 2023.
Water Desalination Systems Based on Renewable Energy Resources
Edit

Water desalination (WD) has been required for the supply of drinking water in a number of countries. Various technologies of WD utilize considerable thermal and/or electrical energies for removing undesirable salts. Desalination systems now rely on renewable energy resources (RERs) such as geothermal, solar, tidal, wind power, etc. The intermittent nature and changeable intensity constrain the wide applications of renewable energy, so the combination of energy storage systems (ESSs) with WD in many locations has been introduced.

desalination renewable energy resources energy storage systems

1. Introduction

In the near future, the scarcity of global fresh water is a colossal danger due to serious overpopulation and the pollution of the available fresh water resources of the underground and rivers as a result of industrial waste. One of the most crucial solutions to avoid this danger is a new supply of clean drinking water. Seawater holds almost 97% of accessible water resources, making the use of WD technologies a successful solution to the potable water shortage [1]. In order to confront the rising demand for fresh water for drinking, WD is a technique that effectively removes dissolved salts. The admissible salinity range for potable water, according to the WHO (World Health Organization), is between 500 and 1000 ppm.
Generally, WD is accomplished either mechanically via membrane distillation or thermally by evaporation of seawater. Otherwise, large-scale WD projects involve a number of risks that should be precisely considered for evaluating the system’s feasibility [2]. The different methods of water desalination processes (WDPs) that are categorized into thermal and membrane are introduced in Figure 1. The thermal process contains humidification–dehumidification (HDH), solar stills (SS), vapor compression (VC), multi-stage flash (MSF), and multi-effect distillation (MED); the membrane techniques include reverse osmosis (RO) and electrodialysis (ED) [3][4][5]. Overall, the thermal WDP share is almost 35% of the global systems, while RO technology contributes nearly 61% [6].
Figure 1. Common water desalination processes.
Generally, the sources of waste heat are fundamentally categorized into low- and high-grade energies. High-grade sources of waste heat are recovered by various plant processes; however, the low-grade sources are not economically viable for recovery, and they are essentially rejected into the environment [7]. Waste heat, either low- or high- grade energy, is the elementary source of thermal energy losses in industrial processes such as the refining of petroleum, petrochemical, beverage and food, pulp and paper, textiles, etc. [8]. Thermal methods of WD systems may be on a large scale coupled with industrial applications based on the utilization of waste heat or small-scale systems integrated with electric heaters based on fossil fuels or renewable energy resources (RERs). Large-scale water desalination plants based on industrial applications, viz., MSF, MED, and RO, with relatively high water productivity were reviewed [9][10].
Joining both energy and fresh water frameworks can distinguish new options for enhancing the efficiency of the overall resource [11]. Detailed knowledge of the current combination of water and energy in water desalination systems (WDSs) is indispensable, along with a good understanding of key factors involved in decision making to recognize and realize the opportunities for required energy [12]. Water is necessary to refine petroleum products and cool the condensers in power plants. Additionally, energy is required for WD, the treatment of wastewater, purification, conveyance, and pumping for end use [13]. Improved knowledge based on the incorporation of water and energy was presented in many locations across the world [14]. Moreover, the developing issue of a multi-plant accompanying the economical implementation of energy and water was presented [15].
The energy that is demanded to drive WDSs could be supplied from RERs such as solar, wind, tidal energies, etc. One of the most popular technologies of WD is the HDH process. Since HDH systems operate at a modest operating pressure, only minimal mechanical energy is required to circulate air and water using fans and pumps [16]. HDH techniques have several benefits, including the capability to function in low-temperature conditions, ease of construction, cheap initial and operational costs, and integration with sustainable RERs, among others.
Initially, non-renewable-energy-based resources were utilized to obtain desalination systems with 1000 m3 daily of drinking desalinated water by depleting 10,000 tons of oil yearly [17]. These systems increase greenhouse gas emissions, deplete the available limited stores of fossil fuels, and threaten the progress of sustainable development. Therefore, thermal WD technology depends on renewable energy for supplying thermal energy, which has a growing trend to provide abundant advantages compared to traditional energy resources. Solar energy appears to be the appropriate choice to supply the necessary thermal energy, particularly in regions having high solar irradiation and insufficient resources of fresh drinking water [18]. Seawater absorbs solar energy from the sun in thermal WDSs powered by solar energy, and then it evaporates as clean water droplets from the ocean’s surface. Finally, accumulating clouds are condensed, and rain is produced, providing fresh water for drinking.
As a result of the high energy consumption of reverse osmosis (RO) WDSs, which require almost 3–10 kWh of electricity to create 1 m³ of desalinated water, this technology is not sustainable [19]. RO-WDSs function with a nominal load of constant pressure and flow rate of the feed water to the membranes, while a variable operating load of RO-WDSs, i.e., different flow rater and feeding pressures, introduces outstanding results [20]. The benefits of combining wind energy [21] and photovoltaic (PV) panels [22] with RO-WDSs have already been implemented. Both gravitational potential and wind energies were combined in RO-WDSs [23]. Traditional WD processes such as TVC, MVC, and RO are the most commonly employed technologies in industries, whereas hybrid technologies such as MSF-RO [24][25], MED-adsorption systems [26], MED-RO [27], MED-MSF [28], etc., are developed to augment both the production of fresh water and the thermodynamic synergy.
One of the promising recent technologies for water desalination as well as power generation which have been implemented intensively is pressure retarded osmosis (PRO), which could be beneficial for recycling RO brine [29]. Generally, the PRO process has greatly evolved since 1973 due to the fast advances in membrane technologies. PRO consists mainly of a membrane and a hydro turbine to transfer the hydraulic energy into electric energy. It has a unique characteristic in which the waste stream can be reused as a feed supply into the PRO system. Initially, the fundamental challenge faced by the development of PRO techniques was to select a suitable membrane with reasonable mechanical stability, high salt rejection, and high permeability of water [30][31]. This method has a number of advantages according to its commercialization, such as operation throughout the day; not being affected by RESs, viz., wind and solar radiation; requiring a small footprint, etc. The descriptions of thermal and membrane WD technologies are introduced in Table 1.
Table 1. Descriptions of thermal and membrane WD technologies.
Technology Thermal Membrane
Mechanism Evaporation and condensation. Pressure and concentration gradient driven.
Applications HDH, SS, TVC, MED, MSF. ED, RO.
Operating temperature 60–120 °C. Less than 45 °C.
Driving force Gradient of concentration and temperature. Gradient of temperature and pressure.
Form of energy required Steam, waste heat, renewable energy, and limited mechanical power for the pumping processes. Prime fossil energy or renewable-energy-driven power.

2. Desalination Systems Based on Renewable Energy Resources

Renewable energy is accessible everywhere, which makes it an effective alternative to depleted fossil fuels. Renewable energy is becoming continuously reliable, with decreasing costs year-on-year; therefore, renewable energy is a practicable choice in different regions. With the rising demand for desalinated drinking water, renewable-energy-powered WDSs have a massive worldwide potential market [32]. The dependence on depleted fossil fuels for WDSs continues, since they are the most reliable energy form and cost-effective. However, developing WDSs based on fossil fuels has a number of challenges, i.e., high energy demand and emissions of CO2. There is considerable potential in integrating WD technologies with RERs, by supporting technically and funding feasible renewable energy systems. Sustainable WD schemes are technically feasible for producing remarkable amounts of desalinated water using the available RERs [33]. When compared to traditional fossil-fuel-powered WDSs, the combination of WDSs and RERs has been discovered as a more sustainable, desirable, and financially feasible choice. A global analysis of utilizing solar energy for WD was conducted [34].
Recent advancements in WD technologies contribute to lowered cost, affordability, and higher efficiency. In recent years, energy consumed by WDSs based on RERs has been significantly reduced. Utilization of RERs such as solar, geothermal, wind, tidal, etc., for WDSs appears to introduce sustainable alternatives. Figure 2 illustrates the various paths through which common RERs may be employed to drive various WDS processes. The WD technology should be integrated with proper RERs, having the ability to use the available RERs effectively.
Figure 2. Possible pathways for renewable-energy-driven WD techniques.

3. Energy Storage for Water Desalination

The fundamental issue with RERs for WDSs is their intermittent discontinuous form and intensity, which restrict their widespread applicability in a variety of sites. In addition, the costs associated with the technologies of WD based on RERs are another major barrier to the successful implementations of these available and sustainable RERs. Energy storage technologies that could improve the performance of RERs for WDSs aid in improving the intermittent behavior of RERs and may enhance the long-term sustainability of WDS investment. WD technologies powered by thermal energy may employ the storage units known as TES to capture, store, and then release energy to correspond to the trends of energy demand and supply. TES could be combined with readily available energy supplies, whether waste heat or renewable energy [35]. From thermodynamic aspects, the heat capacity of storage materials is proportional to their specific heat, volume, density, and operating temperature difference [36].
The functions of TES units include charging, storing, and discharging [37]. TES in WDSs can be implemented by diverse principal methods: sensible TES, using either solid or liquid materials; phase-change/latent energy storage; and thermochemical energy storage. Sensible TES is accomplished via the fundamental modes of heat transfer, i.e., convection, conduction, and radiation, whereas phase-change heat storage materials are known as latent-heat-storing materials. Usually, the solid–liquid phase is highlighted, whereas liquid–solid phase change involves solidification/melting for discharging/charging processes. It is a cyclical process that demonstrates the durability and thermal stability of a material as a thermal storage medium [38].
Sensible heat storage (SHS) materials for WDSs are superabundant in nature, making them convenient, economical, and accessible, whereas latent heat storage (LHS) material increases nocturnal production of fresh water [39]. TES can store and transport with the working fluids associated with operating parameters such as pressure and temperature. According to the availability of thermal resources, the working medium’s capacity to store thermal energy determines its suitability for use. One of the auspicious materials for TES systems is phase-change material (PCM); however, the commonly employed PCMs have limited thermal conductivity. However, nanotechnology uses a highly efficient thermal system to enhance the functionality of the TES system and is suitable in terms of the efficiency of the recovery process, financial feasibility, and environmental aspects. Thus, raising the thermal conductivity of PCM composites via different nanoparticles is an encouraging option for improving thermal performance. Table 2 lists the benefits and drawbacks of the various TES system types.
Table 2. Characteristics of TES systems.
In the last decades, the prompt growth in heat capacity of various RERs requires further advancements in ESSs that can store the excessive rise in energy capacity. The quantity of energy stored by SHS material is directly impacted by the temperature differential between the storage medium at the inflow and outflow, the mass flow rate, and the storage medium’s heat capacity [40]. Depending on the medium temperature, the stored energy inside the TES system may be utilized for diverse purposes. Low-temperature applications of WD are suitable for energy resources with a temperature range of 60–80 °C, whereas other industrial processes and the production of electrical power require energy resources with a temperature range of 100–400 °C [41]. Sensible heat TES systems using water as a working medium can store energy under the boiling water temperature; as a result, only WD at low temperatures, such as that in solar stills, multi-effect evaporation systems, membranes, HDH-WDSs, etc., may use them. On the other hand, liquid salt materials or solid-state materials can store high-grade thermal energy within a 200–500 °C temperature range, which is ideal for electric power generation integrated with WDPs, such as multi-effect evaporation of MED, MSF, and M/TVC.
The unavoidable fluctuations of various RERs such as solar, wind, and others, make it exceedingly difficult to connect these systems with cooling/heating needs and client electricity demands. Therefore, massive research has investigated different technologies of ESSs, both thermal and electrical, to fulfill more stability of power supply for WDSs [42]. Furthermore, implementing convenient energy technology can create significant challenges for establishing grid stability; thus, energy storage of excess RER output is critical for voltage and power balance. Electricity storage is required for backup generation, frequency control, load balancing, peak shaving, and thermal energy management.
In addition, the power demand of WDSs does not permanently and conveniently match the electrical power supply; therefore, suitable ESSs are requisite for a reliable power supply. Recently, the most convenient devices for storing electricity have been batteries that supply electricity periodically as needed. However, the batteries emit toxic harmful substances during malfunction situations and at disposal times [43]. Batteries are promising techniques for storing electrical energy. Recent advances in battery technology promise practical energy storage with low self-discharge rates and high energy densities (gravimetric and volumetric) [44]. Batteries are required in WDSs driven by RERs, to prevent the inevitable dumping of energy and elevate the running period for producing fresh water. However, these batteries are costly and have a limited lifespan.
As a result of extensive progress in RERs, traditional ESSs such as batteries cannot counter the requirements of energy storage, particularly when the grid connection is not accessible. Flow batteries introduce a promising solution for the high density of energy and lifetime [45][46]. In spite of this, their application is accompanied by high cost due to the issues related to the materials and technical circumstances that should be solved prior to the commercialization of the product [47]. Accordingly, innovative methods are required to find methods of effective energy storage, such as electrolyzer/fuel cell cycle systems [48][49].

References

  1. Mohamed, A.S.A.; Ahmed, M.S.; Maghrabie, H.M.; Shahdy, A.G. Desalination Process Using Humidification–Dehumidification Technique: A Detailed Review. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 45, 3698–3749.
  2. Zhang, Y.; Wang, R.; Huang, P.; Wang, X.; Wang, S. Risk Evaluation of Large-Scale Seawater Desalination Projects Based on an Integrated Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation and Analytic Hierarchy Process Method. Desalination 2020, 478, 114286.
  3. Cohen, Y. Advances in Water Desalination Technologies; World Scientific: Singapore, 2021.
  4. El-Dessouky, H.T.; Ettouney, H.M. Fundamentals of Salt Water Desalination; Elsevier Science, B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002.
  5. Shi, J.; Gong, L.; Zhang, T.; Sun, S. Study of the Seawater Desalination Performance by Electrodialysis. Membranes 2022, 12, 767.
  6. Mabrouk, A.N.A. Technoeconomic Analysis of Once through Long Tube MSF Process for High Capacity Desalination Plants. Desalination 2013, 317, 84–94.
  7. Ammar, Y.; Joyce, S.; Norman, R.; Wang, Y.; Roskilly, A.P. Low Grade Thermal Energy Sources and Uses from the Process Industry in the UK. Appl. Energy 2012, 89, 3–20.
  8. Rahimi, B.; Marvi, Z.; Alamolhoda, A.A.; Abbaspour, M.; Chua, H.T. An Industrial Application of Low-Grade Sensible Waste Heat Driven Seawater Desalination: A Case Study. Desalination 2019, 470, 114055.
  9. Likhachev, D.S.; Li, F.-C. Large-Scale Water Desalination Methods: A Review and New Perspectives. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51, 2836–2849.
  10. Adham, S.; Hussain, A.; Minier-Matar, J.; Janson, A.; Sharma, R. Membrane Applications and Opportunities for Water Management in the Oil & Gas Industry. Desalination 2018, 440, 2–17.
  11. Siddiqi, A.; Kajenthira, A.; Anadón, L.D. Bridging Decision Networks for Integrated Water and Energy Planning. Energy Strateg. Rev. 2013, 2, 46–58.
  12. Gleick, P.H. Water and Energy. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 1994, 19, 267–299.
  13. McMahon, J.E.; Price, S.E. Water and Energy Interactions. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2011, 36, 163–191.
  14. Tayyeban, E.; Deymi-Dashtebayaz, M.; Dadpour, D. Multi Objective Optimization of MSF and MSF-TVC Desalination Systems with Using the Surplus Low-Pressure Steam (an Energy, Exergy and Economic Analysis). Comput. Chem. Eng. 2022, 160, 107708.
  15. Santhosh, A.; Farid, A.M.; Youcef-Toumi, K. Real-Time Economic Dispatch for the Supply Side of the Energy-Water Nexus. Appl. Energy 2014, 122, 42–52.
  16. Lawal, D.U.; Qasem, N.A.A. Humidification-Dehumidification Desalination Systems Driven by Thermal-Based Renewable and Low-Grade Energy Sources: A Critical Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 125, 109817.
  17. Kalogirou, S.A. Seawater Desalination Using Renewable Energy Sources. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2005, 31, 242–281.
  18. Elminshawy, N.A.S.; Siddiqui, F.R.; Addas, M.F. Development of an Active Solar Humidification-Dehumidification (HDH) Desalination System Integrated with Geothermal Energy. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 126, 608–621.
  19. Shemer, H.; Semiat, R. Sustainable RO Desalination—Energy Demand and Environmental Impact. Desalination 2017, 424, 10–16.
  20. Dimitriou, E.; Mohamed, E.S.; Karavas, C.; Papadakis, G. Experimental Comparison of the Performance of Two Reverse Osmosis Desalination Units Equipped with Different Energy Recovery Devices. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 55, 3019–3026.
  21. Peñate, B.; Castellano, F.; Bello, A.; García-Rodríguez, L. Assessment of a Stand-Alone Gradual Capacity Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plant to Adapt to Wind Power Availability: A Case Study. Energy 2011, 36, 4372–4384.
  22. Armendáriz-Ontiveros, M.M.; Dévora-Isiordia, G.E.; Rodríguez-López, J.; Sánchez-Duarte, R.G.; Álvarez-Sánchez, J.; Villegas-Peralta, Y.; del Rosario Martínez-Macias, M. Effect of Temperature on Energy Consumption and Polarization in Reverse Osmosis Desalination Using a Spray-Cooled Photovoltaic System. Energies 2022, 15, 7787.
  23. Rashidi, M.M.; Mahariq, I.; Murshid, N.; Wongwises, S.; Mahian, O.; Nazari, M.A. Applying Wind Energy as a Clean Source for Reverse Osmosis Desalination: A Comprehensive Review. Alexandria Eng. J. 2022, 61, 12977–12989.
  24. He, L.; Jiang, A.; Huang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; Xia, Y. Modeling and Structural Optimization of MSF-RO Desalination System. Membranes 2022, 12, 545.
  25. Manesh, M.H.K.; Kabiri, S.; Yazdi, M. Integration of MED-RO and MSF-RO Desalination with a Combined Cycle Power Plant. Desalin. Water Treat. 2020, 179, 106–129.
  26. Shahzad, M.W.; Burhan, M.; Ghaffour, N.; Ng, K.C. A Multi Evaporator Desalination System Operated with Thermocline Energy for Future Sustainability. Desalination 2018, 435, 268–277.
  27. Shahzad, M.W.; Burhan, M.; Ng, K.C. Pushing Desalination Recovery to the Maximum Limit: Membrane and Thermal Processes Integration. Desalination 2017, 416, 54–64.
  28. Manesh, M.H.K.; Kabiri, S.; Yazdi, M. Exergoenvironmental Analysis and Evaluation of Coupling MSF, MED and RO Desalination Plants with a Combined Cycle Plant. Int. J. Exergy 2020, 33, 76–97.
  29. Kim, Y.C.; Elimelech, M. Potential of Osmotic Power Generation by Pressure Retarded Osmosis Using Seawater as Feed Solution: Analysis and Experiments. J. Memb. Sci. 2013, 429, 330–337.
  30. Obode, E.I.; Badreldin, A.; Adham, S.; Castier, M.; Abdel-Wahab, A. Techno-Economic Analysis towards Full-Scale Pressure Retarded Osmosis Plants. Energies 2023, 16, 325.
  31. Wang, J.; Liu, X. Forward Osmosis Technology for Water Treatment: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 280, 124354.
  32. Segurado, R.; Costa, M.; Duić, N.; Carvalho, M.G. Integrated Analysis of Energy and Water Supply in Islands. Case Study of S. Vicente, Cape Verde. Energy 2015, 92, 639–648.
  33. Ghaffour, N.; Lattemann, S.; Missimer, T.; Ng, K.C.; Sinha, S.; Amy, G. Renewable Energy-Driven Innovative Energy-Efficient Desalination Technologies. Appl. Energy 2014, 136, 1155–1165.
  34. García-Rodríguez, L.; Palmero-Marrero, A.I.; Gómez-Camacho, C. Comparison of Solar Thermal Technologies for Applications in Seawater Desalination. Desalination 2002, 142, 135–142.
  35. Gude, G.G. Renewable Energy Powered Desalination Handbook: Application and Thermodynamics; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2018.
  36. Dinker, A.; Agarwal, M.; Agarwal, G.D. Heat Storage Materials, Geometry and Applications: A Review. J. Energy Inst. 2017, 90, 1–11.
  37. Dincer, I.; Dost, S. A Perspective on Thermal Energy Storage Systems for Solar Energy Applications. Int. J. Energy Res. 1996, 20, 547–557.
  38. Aneke, M.; Wang, M. Energy Storage Technologies and Real Life Applications—A State of the Art Review. Appl. Energy 2016, 179, 350–377.
  39. Chauhan, V.K.; Shukla, S.K.; Rathore, P.K.S. A Systematic Review for Performance Augmentation of Solar Still with Heat Storage Materials: A State of Art. J. Energy Storage 2022, 47, 103578.
  40. Dincer, I. On Thermal Energy Storage Systems and Applications in Buildings. Energy Build. 2002, 34, 377–388.
  41. Herrmann, U.; Kearney, D.W. Survey of Thermal Energy Storage for Parabolic trough Power Plants. J. Sol. Energy Eng. Trans. ASME 2002, 124, 145–152.
  42. Jana, K.; Ray, A.; Majoumerd, M.M.; Assadi, M.; De, S. Polygeneration as a Future Sustainable Energy Solution—A Comprehensive Review. Appl. Energy 2017, 205, 88–111.
  43. Nedjalkov, A.; Meyer, J.; Köhring, M.; Doering, A.; Angelmahr, M.; Dahle, S.; Sander, A.; Fischer, A.; Schade, W. Toxic Gas Emissions from Damaged Lithium Ion Batteries—Analysis and Safety Enhancement Solution. Batteries 2016, 2, 5.
  44. Zhao, R.; Gu, J.; Liu, J. Performance Assessment of a Passive Core Cooling Design for Cylindrical Lithium-Ion Batteries. Int. J. Energy Res. 2018, 42, 2728–2740.
  45. Sun, H.; Yu, M.; Li, Q.; Zhuang, K.; Li, J.; Almheiri, S.; Zhang, X. Characteristics of Charge/Discharge and Alternating Current Impedance in All-Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries. Energy 2019, 168, 693–701.
  46. Weng, G.-M.; Li, C.-Y.V.; Chan, K.-Y. Three-Electrolyte Electrochemical Energy Storage Systems Using Both Anion- and Cation-Exchange Membranes as Separators. Energy 2019, 167, 1011–1018.
  47. Huskinson, B.; Marshak, M.P.; Suh, C.; Er, S.; Michael, R.; Gerhardt, C.J.G.; Xudong Chen, A.A.-G.; Gordon, R.G.; Aziz, M.J. A Metal-Free Organic–Inorganic Aqueous Flow Battery. Nature 2014, 505, 195–198.
  48. Zhang, X.; Chan, S.H.; Ho, H.K.; Tan, S.-C.; Li, M.; Li, G.; Li, J.; Feng, Z. Towards a Smart Energy Network: The Roles of Fuel/Electrolysis Cells and Technological Perspectives. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 6866–6919.
  49. Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Katterbauer, K.; Shehri, A.A.; Sun, S.; Hoteit, I. Phase Equilibrium in the Hydrogen Energy Chain. Fuel 2022, 328, 125324.
More
Information
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , , , ,
View Times: 419
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 06 Apr 2023
1000/1000