Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 During A. tumefaciens infection, plant cells may detect bacteria-derived PAMPs such as elf18 and VirB2 peptides and activate the plant immune response with the help of RTNLB4 and EFR-mediated MAPK signaling. + 1077 word(s) 1077 2020-03-16 10:39:54 |
2 format correct -6 word(s) 1071 2020-11-01 14:43:45 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Huang, F.; Hwang, H. Arabidopsis RETICULON-LIKE4 (RTNLB4). Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 25 June 2024).
Huang F, Hwang H. Arabidopsis RETICULON-LIKE4 (RTNLB4). Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed June 25, 2024.
Huang, Fan-Chen, Hau-Hsuan Hwang. "Arabidopsis RETICULON-LIKE4 (RTNLB4)" Encyclopedia, (accessed June 25, 2024).
Huang, F., & Hwang, H. (2020, March 18). Arabidopsis RETICULON-LIKE4 (RTNLB4). In Encyclopedia.
Huang, Fan-Chen and Hau-Hsuan Hwang. "Arabidopsis RETICULON-LIKE4 (RTNLB4)." Encyclopedia. Web. 18 March, 2020.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens genetically transforms plant cells by transferring the transfer-DNA (T-DNA) and virulence (Vir) proteins from bacteria via a VirB-encoded type IV secretion system into plants. The effectors manipulate plant proteins to assist in T-DNA transfer, integration, and expression in plant cells. The Arabidopsis reticulon-like (RTNLB) proteins are located in the endoplasmic reticulum and are involved in endomembrane trafficking in plant cells. We functionally characterized reticulon-like protein B4 (RTNLB4), which interacted with the A. tumefaciens VirB2 protein, a major component of A. tumefaciens T-pilus. Overexpression or knockdown of RTNLB4 affected the expression of A. tumefaciens elf18 peptide-induced plant defense-related genes and could affect Agrobacterium-mediated transformation rates. Pre-treatment with elf18 peptide decreased Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression efficiency more in wild-type seedlings than RTNLB4 O/E transgenic plants, which suggests that the induced defense responses in RTNLB4 O/E transgenic plants might be affected after bacterial elicitor treatments. We also showed that two VirB2 peptides induced the expression of defense-related genes and H2O2 production and inhibited seedling growth. These typical pathogen-associated molecular pattern-trigged immune responses were less induced in RTNLB4 overexpression transgenic plants. Our findings provide strong evidence that RTNLB4 has major roles in the A. tumefaciens elf18 and VirB2 peptide-derived plant defense responses. We believe this study advances our understanding of possible functions of the RTNLB4 protein in the A. tumefaciens infection process and plant immunity.

RTNLB Agrobacterium plant defense response VirB2 type IV secretion system (T4SS)

1. Introduction

The typical type IV secretion system (T4SS)-containing phytopathogenic bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens is well known for its ability to transfer DNA into plant cells. The trans-kingdom DNA transfer ability renders A. tumefaciens the most widely used tool to generate transgenic plants [1]. Once the host plants are transformed by A. tumefaciens, the infected plant tissues generate tumors, which results in crown gall disease. The host plant wound sites can secrete phenolic compounds, carbohydrates, and hydrogen ions to create acidic environments for repairing cell damage on cell surfaces [2].

The VirA/VirG two-component system in A. tumefaciens can detect phenolic compounds, such as acetosyringone (AS), released from plants, and activates downstream vir gene expression to help with bacterial infection [3]. One of the Vir proteins, VirD2, binds to the border sequences of the tumor-inducing plasmid (Ti-plasmid), and the T-DNA fragment (called transfer DNA, T-DNA) is processed, generated, and transferred into plant cells. VirD2 covalently binds to the 5’ end of T-DNA and guides T-DNA transfer into plants through a type IV secretion system (T4SS) that contains a transmembrane transporter and a filamentous pilus (T-pilus) comprising VirB1-B11 and VirD4 proteins [4][5].

In addition to VirD2, the VirE2, VirE3, VirD5, and VirF proteins are transferred into plant cells via a T4SS and help with T-DNA transfer and integration into the plant genome [6]. VirE2 protein is a single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) that can bind to the single-strand T-DNA and prevent T-DNA degradation by host enzymes [7]. Recent studies demonstrated that VirE2 may enter the plant cells by clathrin-mediated endocytosis, and the pattern of VirE2 migration is consistent with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and F-actin network, which suggests that VirE2 may move through the plant cytoskeleton network into the nucleus [8][9][10]. VirD2 and VirE2 interact with several members of the importinα (IMPa) family that mediate nuclear import of NLS-containing proteins in plant cells [11][12]. The host cell nuclear import machinery may be used by A. tumefaciens to help with nuclear targeting of T-DNA [2][13].

Upon A. tumefaciens infection, VirE2-interacting protein 1 (VIP1) is phosphorylated by mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 (MPK3) and acts as a transcription factor that induces the expression of several stress-responsive genes, such as PATHOGENESIS-RELATED 1, and activates stress signaling transduction cascades to counteract bacterial infection [14][15][16]. In addition, phosphorylation of VIP1 by MPK3 can help with nuclear entry of VIP1 by the plant cell nuclear import system [14][15][16]. However, A. tumefaciens may use another effector protein, VirF, to decrease the VIP1-mediated host defense responses by forming a SCF–E3 ligase complex and degrading the VirE2–VIP1 protein complex by the ubiquitin/proteasome system of the host defense mechanism [17][18][19][20]. At the same time, VirF may facilitate the disassembly of the T-complex by the plant ubiquitin–proteasome complex and mediate T-DNA integration into the host chromosome [19][20][21]. Inside plant cells, VIP1-binding F-box protein is a member of the SCF complex and may functionally replace VirF to destabilize the VIP1–VirE2 complex by proteasomal degradation [19]. Thus, A. tumefaciens utilizes various bacteria effectors and exploits plant proteins to avoid plant defense responses and secure successful infection.

During plant pathogen infections, endomembrane trafficking systems help transport surface-localized pattern-recognized receptors (PRRs) to the plant cell surface for secretion of defense-related proteins, antimicrobial metabolites, and cell wall components to counteract pathogen invasion [22][23][24]. The functions of vesicle trafficking and integrity of the endomembrane system play important roles in the plant defense response. The reticulon (RTN) proteins are mainly associated with the ER and are involved in neurite growth, endomembrane trafficking, cell division, and apoptosis [25][26]. The plant subfamily of RTN-like proteins (RTNLBs) has 21 members in Arabidopsis [27]. Only a few members of RTNLBs have been studied, and five members (AtRTNLB1-4 and 13) are predominantly localized in ER and participate in tubular ER shaping [27][28][29]. So far, only limited reports demonstrated the RTNLB roles in plant defense responses.

In this entry, we showed that when the RTNLB4 was knocked down or overexpressed, the transformation rates of A. tumefaciens were affected. The induced expression of defense-related genes was lower in RTNLB4 overexpression (O/E) transgenic plants treated with a PAMP, the elf18 peptide, which suggests the involvement of RTNLB4 in plant defense responses. RTNLB4 interacted with A. tumefaciens VirB2, a major component of T-pili. Different regions of the processed VirB2 proteins were then used to design five peptides to examine their effects on plant defense gene expression and response. Pretreatment with two VirB2 peptides, S111-T58 and I63-I80, for 6 hr decreased transient T-DNA expression in wild-type but not efr-1 and bak1 mutant seedlings. The two peptides induced relatively higher expression of several defense-related genes, including FRK1, WRKY22, WRKY29, MPK3, and MPK6, in wild-type plants than in RTNLB4 O/E transgenic plants. Furthermore, elf18- and VirB2 peptides-mediated Arabidopsis seedling growth inhibition and H2O2 accumulation were reduced in RTNLB4 O/E transgenic plants. RTNLB4 may have important roles in A. tumefaciens elf18 and VirB2 peptide-induced plant defense responses.

2. Data

The publication “Arabidopsis RETICULON-LIKE4 (RTNLB4) Protein Participates in Agrobacterium Infection and VirB2 Peptide-Induced Plant Defense Response” can be found here:

 Graphical abstract



  1. Hau-Hsuan Hwang; Manda Yu; Erh-Min Lai; Agrobacterium-Mediated Plant Transformation: Biology and Applications. The Arabidopsis Book 2017, 15, e0186, 10.1199/tab.0186.
  2. Benot Lacroix; Vitaly Citovsky; Benoît Lacroix; The roles of bacterial and host plant factors in Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation. The International Journal of Developmental Biology 2013, 57, 467-481, 10.1387/ijdb.130199bl.
  3. Yi-Han Lin; Rong Gao; Andrew N. Binns; David G. Lynn; Capturing the VirA/VirG TCS of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2008, 631, 161-177, 10.1007/978-0-387-78885-2_11.
  4. Peter J. Christie; The Mosaic Type IV Secretion Systems.. EcoSal Plus 2016, 7, 10.1128, 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0020-2015.
  5. Yang Grace Li; Peter J. Christie; The Agrobacterium VirB/VirD4 T4SS: Mechanism and Architecture Defined Through In Vivo Mutagenesis and Chimeric Systems. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 2018, 418, 233-260, 10.1007/82_2018_94.
  6. Annette Vergunst; Barbara Schrammeijer; Amke Den Dulk-Ras; Clementine M. T. De Vlaam; Tonny J. G. Regensburg-Tuı̈nk; Paul Hooykaas; VirB/D4-Dependent Protein Translocation from Agrobacterium into Plant Cells. Science 2000, 290, 979-982, 10.1126/science.290.5493.979.
  7. Myriam Duckely; Barbara Hohn; The VirE2 protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens: the Yin and Yang of T-DNA transfer.. FEMS Microbiology Letters 2003, 223, 1-6, 10.1016/s0378-1097(03)00246-5.
  8. Xiaoyang Li; Shen Q. Pan; Agrobacteriumdelivers VirE2 protein into host cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Science Advances 2017, 3, e1601528, 10.1126/sciadv.1601528.
  9. Haitao Tu; Xiaoyang Li; Qinghua Yang; Ling Peng; Shen Q. Pan; Real-Time Trafficking of Agrobacterium Virulence Protein VirE2 Inside Host Cells. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 2018, 418, 261-286, 10.1007/82_2018_131.
  10. Qinghua Yang; Xiaoyang Li; Haitao Tu; Shen Q. Pan; Agrobacterium-delivered virulence protein VirE2 is trafficked inside host cells via a myosin XI-K–powered ER/actin network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2017, 114, 2982-2987, 10.1073/pnas.1612098114.
  11. Nurit Ballas; Vitaly Citovsky; Nuclear localization signal binding protein from Arabidopsis mediates nuclear import of Agrobacterium VirD2 protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1997, 94, 10723-10728, 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10723.
  12. Saikat Bhattacharjee; Lan-Ying Lee; Heiko Oltmanns; HongBin Cao; Joshua Cuperus; Stanton B. Gelvin; IMPa-4, an Arabidopsis Importin α Isoform, Is Preferentially Involved in Agrobacterium-Mediated Plant Transformation[W]. The Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2661-2680, 10.1105/tpc.108.060467.
  13. Stanton B. Gelvin; Integration ofAgrobacteriumT-DNA into the Plant Genome. Annual Review of Genetics 2017, 51, 195-217, 10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-035320.
  14. Armin Djamei; Andrea Pitzschke; Hirofumi Nakagami; Iva Rajh; Heribert Hirt; Trojan Horse Strategy in Agrobacterium Transformation: Abusing MAPK Defense Signaling. Science 2007, 318, 453-456, 10.1126/science.1148110.
  15. Andrea Pitzschke; Agrobacterium infection and plant defense—transformation success hangs by a thread. Frontiers in Plant Science 2013, 4, 519, 10.3389/fpls.2013.00519.
  16. Andrea Pitzschke; Armin Djamei; Markus Teige; Heribert Hirt; VIP1 response elements mediate mitogen-activated protein kinase 3-induced stress gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106, 18414-18419, 10.1073/pnas.0905599106.
  17. Elena García-Cano; Hagit Hak; Shimpei Magori; Sondra G. Lazarowitz; Vitaly Citovsky; The Agrobacterium F-Box Protein Effector VirF Destabilizes the Arabidopsis GLABROUS1 Enhancer/Binding Protein-Like Transcription Factor VFP4, a Transcriptional Activator of Defense Response Genes.. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® 2018, 31, 576-586, 10.1094/MPMI-07-17-0188-FI.
  18. Tzvi Tzfira; Manjusha Vaidya; Vitaly Citovsky; VIP1, an Arabidopsis protein that interacts with Agrobacterium VirE2, is involved in VirE2 nuclear import and Agrobacterium infectivity. The EMBO Journal 2001, 20, 3596-3607, 10.1093/emboj/20.13.3596.
  19. Adi Zaltsman; Alexander Krichevsky; Abraham Loyter; Vitaly Citovsky; Agrobacterium Induces Expression of a Host F-Box Protein Required for Tumorigenicity. Cell Host & Microbe 2010, 7, 197-209, 10.1016/j.chom.2010.02.009.
  20. Adi Zaltsman; Benoît Lacroix; Yedidya Gafni; Vitaly Citovsky; Disassembly of synthetic Agrobacterium T-DNA–protein complexes via the host SCFVBF ubiquitin–ligase complex pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2012, 110, 169-174, 10.1073/pnas.1210921110.
  21. Tzvi Tzfira; Manjusha Vaidya; Vitaly Citovsky; Involvement of targeted proteolysis in plant genetic transformation by Agrobacterium. Nature 2004, 431, 87-92, 10.1038/nature02857.
  22. Yangnan Gu; Raul Zavaliev; Xinnian Dong; Membrane Trafficking in Plant Immunity.. Molecular Plant 2017, 10, 1026-1034, 10.1016/j.molp.2017.07.001.
  23. Wen‐Ming Wang; Peng-Qiang Liu; Yong-Ju Xu; Shunyuan Xiao; Protein trafficking during plant innate immunity. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2016, 58, 284-298, 10.1111/jipb.12426.
  24. Hye Sup Yun; Chian Kwon; Vesicle trafficking in plant immunity. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2017, 40, 34-42, 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.07.001.
  25. Hugues Nziengui; Benoît Schoefs; Functions of reticulons in plants: What we can learn from animals and yeasts. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 2008, 66, 584-595, 10.1007/s00018-008-8373-y.
  26. Thomas Oertle; Martin E. Schwab; Nogo and its paRTNers. Trends in Cell Biology 2003, 13, 187-194, 10.1016/s0962-8924(03)00035-7.
  27. Hugues Nziengui; Karim Bouhidel; David Pillon; Christophe Der; Francis Marty; Benoît Schoefs; Benoıˆt Schoefs; Reticulon-like proteins inArabidopsis thaliana: Structural organization and ER localization. FEBS Letters 2007, 581, 3356-3362, 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.06.032.
  28. Imogen Sparkes; Nicholas Tolley; Isabel Aller; Julia Svozil; Anne Osterrieder; Stanley Botchway; Christopher Mueller; Lorenzo Frigerio; Chris Hawes; Five Arabidopsis Reticulon Isoforms Share Endoplasmic Reticulum Location, Topology, and Membrane-Shaping Properties[W]. The Plant Cell 2010, 22, 1333-1343, 10.1105/tpc.110.074385.
  29. Nicholas Tolley; Imogen A. Sparkes; Paul Hunter; Christian P. Craddock; James Nuttall; Lynne M. Roberts; Chris Hawes; Emanuela Pedrazzini; Lorenzo Frigerio; Overexpression of a Plant Reticulon Remodels the Lumen of the Cortical Endoplasmic Reticulum but Does not Perturb Protein Transport. Traffic 2008, 9, 94-102, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00670.x.
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : ,
View Times: 893
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 01 Nov 2020
Video Production Service