1000/1000
Hot
Most Recent
Water is indispensable for the functioning of all biological organisms. In plants, water has several functions in comparison to other organisms, including transport processes and transpiration. The mechanical properties of plants are highly dependent on water and its localization in tissues and cells.
Species |
Plant Part |
Treatment or Conditions |
H2O Content (g g−1 DM) |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Allium cepa |
Bulbs |
After harvest |
5.09 |
A’yuni et al., 2022 [31] |
After drying, total |
4.26 |
|||
After drying, outer layer |
0.3 |
|||
Allium porrum |
Leaves |
Non-mycorrhizal, 48 h |
5.98 |
Snellgrove et al., 1982 [32] |
Mycorrhizal, 48 h |
6.52 |
|||
Non-mycorrhizal, 214 h |
4.48 |
|||
Mycorrhizal, 214 h |
5.32 |
|||
Roots |
Non-mycorrhizal, 48 h |
9.00 |
||
Mycorrhizal, 48 h |
8.75 |
|||
Non-mycorrhizal, 214 h |
6.89 |
|||
Mycorrhizal, 214 h |
5.80 |
|||
Allium sativum |
Peel of bulb |
Drying 2 days |
3.75 |
Bayat, Rezvani 2012 [33] |
Drying 9 days |
1.15 |
|||
Drying 16 days |
0.12 |
|||
Drying 23 days |
0.07 |
|||
Cocos nucifera |
Fruit endosperm |
6 months |
15.2 |
Santoso et al., 1996 [34] |
12 months |
16.0 |
|||
Limonium sinuatum |
Shoots |
N 0 |
2.72 |
Jain et al., 2018 [35] |
N 10 g m−2 |
3.04 |
|||
N 20 g m−2 |
3.48 |
|||
N 30 g m−2 |
3.19 |
|||
Roots |
N 0 |
1.05 |
||
N 10 g m−2 |
1.87 |
|||
N 20 g m−2 |
2.02 |
|||
N 30 g m−2 |
1.55 |
|||
Limonium stocksii |
Leaves |
Greenhouse conditions |
4.3–3.7 |
Zia et al., 2008 [36] |
Stems |
2.6–2.8 |
|||
Roots |
1.6–2.3 |
|||
Plantago major |
Leaves |
A4 faster growing |
9.3 |
Dijkstra, Lambers 1989 [30] |
W9 slower growing |
7.2 |
|||
Roots |
A4 faster growing |
15.1 |
||
W9 slower growing |
11.2 |
|||
Rhinanthus minor |
Shoot |
Non-parasitic |
4.82 |
Jiang et al., 2007 [37] |
Host-free attached |
4.05 |
|||
Root |
Non-parasitic |
8.43 |
||
Host-free attached |
6.67 |
|||
Rhinanthus serotinus |
Leaves |
Unattached |
4.88 |
Klaren, van de Dijk 1976 [38] |
Attached |
8.52 |
|||
Ranunculus sceleratus |
Leaf petioles |
High air humidity |
18.4 |
Prokopoviča, Ievinsh 2023 [39] |
Normal air humidity |
16.2 |
|||
Leaf blades |
High air humidity |
11.3 |
||
Normal air humidity |
10.0 |
|||
Stems |
High air humidity |
13.7 |
||
Normal air humidity |
11.8 |
|||
Rubus idaeus × Rubus ursinus |
Fruits |
Green |
3.35 |
Vicente et al., 2007 [40] |
Red 25% |
4.88 |
|||
Red 75% |
5.06 |
|||
Red 100% |
5.90 |
|||
Purple |
5.33 |
|||
Solanum tuberosum |
Tubers |
32 days after emergence |
5.4 |
Hajjar et al., 2022 [41] |
46 days after emergence |
3.4 |
|||
60 days after emergence |
2.6 |
|||
Solanum tuberosum |
Tubers |
80 days after planting |
4.26 d |
Solaiman et al., 2015 [42] |
90 days after planting |
3.41 c |
|||
100 days after planting |
2.93 b |
|||
110 days after planting |
2.60 a |
|||
Solanum tuberosum |
Tubers |
Outside |
2.4 |
Pritchard, Scanlon 1997 [11] |
Inside |
3.5 |
|||
Apical end |
2.8 |
|||
Stem end |
3.0 |
|||
Tradescantia pallida |
Leaves |
Low fertilizer level |
19.1 |
Ievinsh et al., 2022 [43] |
High fertilizer level |
27.0 |
|||
Stems |
Low fertilizer level |
15.1 |
||
High fertilizer level |
30.1 |
|||
Trifolium pratense |
Shoots |
Control |
7.50 |
Matse et al., 2020 [44] |
Inoculated CHB 1120 |
5.41 |
|||
Inoculated CHB 1121 |
5.53 |
|||
Inoculated BCRC 14266 |
6.65 |
|||
Roots |
Control |
14.71 |
||
Inoculated CHB 1120 |
7.75 |
|||
Inoculated CHB 1121 |
9.80 |
|||
Inoculated BCRC 14266 |
6.41 |
Species |
Plant Part |
H2O Content (g g−1 DM) |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Actinidia deliciosa |
Peeled fruit |
5.25 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Ananas comosus |
Peeled fruit |
5.25 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Ananas comosus |
Pulp Peel |
6.63 4.78 |
Morais et al., 2017 [54] |
Ananas comosus |
Peeled fruit |
5.03 |
Saputri et al., 2022 [55] |
Artocarpus heterophyllus |
Peeled fruit |
3.44 |
Saputri et al., 2022 [55] |
Carica papaya |
Peeled fruit |
8.09 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Carica papaya |
Peeled fruit |
6.91 |
Untalan et al., 2015 [56] |
Carica papaya |
Pulp Peel |
7.20 6.58 |
Morais et al., 2017 [54] |
Citrullus lanatus |
Peeled fruit |
13.29 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Citrullus lanatus |
Pulp Peel |
11.99 12.51 |
Morais et al., 2017 [54] |
Citrus garndis |
Peeled fruit |
11.11 |
Untalan et al., 2015 [56] |
Citrus × sinnensis |
Peeled fruit |
6.69 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Cucumis melo |
Pulp Peel |
13.93 11.66 |
Morais et al., 2017 [54] |
Cucumis melo |
Peeled fruit |
11.50 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Fragaria × ananasa |
Whole fruit |
10.11 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Malus domestica |
Peeled fruit |
6.14 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Mangifera indica |
Peeled fruit |
5.25 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Manilkara sapota |
Peeled fruit |
2.78 |
Untalan et al., 2015 [56] |
Musa lacatan |
Peeled fruit |
2.65 |
Untalan et al., 2015 [56] |
Musa spp. |
Peeled fruit |
3.00 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Musa spp. |
Pulp Peel |
3.04 8.80 |
Morais et al., 2017 [54] |
Musa spp. |
Peeled fruit |
3.00 |
Saputri et al., 2022 [55] |
Passiflora edulis |
Pulp Peel |
7.40 6.19 |
Morais et al., 2017 [54] |
Persea americana |
Pulp Peel |
6.52 1.92 |
Morais et al., 2017 [54] |
Persea americana |
Peeled fruit |
3.76 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Prunus armeniaca |
Peeled fruit |
7.33 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Prunus avium |
Peeled fruit |
4.00 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Prunus domestica |
Peeled fruit |
5.25 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Prunus persica |
Peeled fruit |
8.09 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Psidium guajava |
Peeled fruit |
4.56 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Pyrus communis |
Peeled fruit |
6.14 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Rubus idaeus |
Whole fruit |
6.14 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
Tamarindus indica |
Peeled fruit |
0.50 |
Untalan et al., 2015 [56] |
Vitis vinifera |
Peeled fruit |
4.56 |
Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2006 [53] |
DM, dry mass. In some cases, the results may be relatively inaccurate because they were read from graphs with the closest possible accuracy. If the original results were not in units of mass of water per unit of dry mass, they were converted accordingly.
Species |
Plant Part |
H2O Content (g g−1 DM) |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Asparagus officinalis |
Shoot |
11.85 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Beta vulgaris |
Leaves |
9.99 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Beta vulgaris |
Root |
6.87 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Beta vulgaris var. cicla |
Leaves |
10.24 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Brassica oleracea var. acephala |
Leaves |
6.87 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis |
Inflorescence |
10.24 |
Hanif et al., 2006 [69] |
Brassica oleracea var. capitata |
Leaves |
11.50 |
Hanif et al., 2006 [69] |
Brassica oleracea var. capitata |
Leaves |
12.16 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Brassica rapa var. rapa |
Root |
10.77 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Colocasia esculenta |
Root |
2.70 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Dioscorea spp. |
Root |
2.77 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Daucus carota |
Root |
7.48 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Daucus carota |
Root |
8.09 |
Hanif et al., 2006 [69] |
Glycine max |
Shoot |
6.30 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Ipomoea batatas |
Root |
2.40 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Lactuca sativa |
Leaves |
15.12 |
Hanif et al., 2006 [69] |
Pastinaca sativa |
Root |
3.79 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Raphanus sativus |
Root |
17.18 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Raphanus sativus |
Root |
12.89 |
Hanif et al., 2006 [69] |
Spinacia oleracea |
Leaves |
9.76 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
Spinacia oleracea |
Leaves |
24.00 |
Hanif et al., 2006 [69] |
Vigna radiata |
Shoot |
7.93 |
Duke, Atchley 1986 [68] |
DM, dry mass. If the original results were not in units of mass of water per unit of dry mass, they were converted accordingly.