2. Current Advances in Nitrogen Containing Heterocycles as Anticancer Agents
2.1. Pyrimidine Derivatives as Anticancer Agents
Pyrimidines gained popularity in the history of organic chemistry as “m-Diazine” which is the product of uric acid catabolism. Brugnatelli discovered the first pyrimidine derivative, alloxan, in 1818 while oxidising uric acid with nitric acid. The heterocyclic six membered aromatic ring of pyrimidine contains nitrogen atoms in 1st and 3rd position. The melting and boiling temperatures of pyrimidine are 22.5 °C and 124 °C, respectively
[24][25].
Fathalla et al. (2012) synthesized 10 pyrimidine derivatives and evaluated their antitumor activity against a liver cancer (HepG2) cell line by a comparison with the well-known anticancer drugs 5-Flurouracil and Doxorubicin. While comparing the synthesized compounds, growth inhibition effectiveness was shown on the tested tumor cell line at doses between 1 and 10 µg/mL. The most potent compound was found to be compound
1 with the IC
50 value of 3.56 µg/mL, whereas doxorubicin and 5-flurouracil were having IC
50 values 3.56 µg/mL and 5 µg/mL, respectively
[26]. Ahmed et al. (2020) synthesized and evaluated the anti-tumor activity of 16 nitrogen heterocyclic compounds bearing a pyrimidine moiety. The newly developed pyrimidine derivatives were tested for in vitro anti-proliferative activity against human liver (HepG2), breast (MCF7), and normal fibroblast (WI–38) cell lines, and their efficacy was compared to Doxorubicin. Among all the tested compounds, compound
2 showed excellent anticancer activity with IC
50 values of 7.36, 10.76, and 6.7 µM respectively, whereas IC
50 values of doxorubicin were 4.5, 4.1, and 6.7 µM (WI-38) respectively
[27]. Gupta et al. (2022) studied the anticancer activity of spiroisoquinoline-pyrimidine derivatives against the MCF-7 cancer cell line. Out of these, compound
3 having an ethoxy group from the acetylene molecule was found to be the most potent cytotoxic agent with an IC
50 value of 98.8 µM as compared to the reference Doxorubicin. An MTT assay was carried out at the concentration of 50 µM and it showed 60% of cell viability with control doxorubicin having 100% cell viability
[28]. Al-Issa (2013) synthesized fused pyrimidines and tested them in vitro anti-tumour activity against human cancer cell line HEPG2. Out of these compounds, the most potent anticancer activity was shown by the compound
4 with the IC
50 value of 17.4 µg/mL as compared to the standard drug doxorubicin having an IC
50 value 1.2 µg/mL
[29]. Osmania et al. (2022) synthesized a new pyrimidine-triazole derivatives and carried out studies on its anticancer effect. A total of 10 novel Pyrimidine-Triazole derivatives were synthesized and they were evaluated against three cancer cell lines; A549, MCF-7, and NIH3T3. IC
50 values were calculated at 24 h and 48 h (incubation time). Two compounds, namely compound
5a and
5b, were found to be potent anticancer agents. Compounds
5a and
5b have the IC
50 values of 1.573 μM and 3.698 μM after 48 h on MCF-7 cell lines respectively. The selective index of these compounds at the end of incubation period was 28.59 and 5.51, respectively. The control was Cisplatin with the IC
50 value of 49.23 µM (48 hr) and Doxorubicin at 0.958 µM (48 hr) against the MCF cell line, respectively. The aromatase enzyme inhibition effects of the compound
5a and
5b is also calculated having the IC
50 values of 0.082 and 0.198 μM
[30]. Qin et al. (2015) synthesized fifteen 2,4-diaminopyrimidines and evaluated their biological activity as selective Aurora A kinase inhibitors. Their cytotoxic activity was tested against five cell lines. The most potent compound was compound
6 with IC
50 values of 3.6 µM (HCT-8), 0.5 µM (A-549), 0.9 µM (HeLa), and 2.4 µM (Hep-G2). VX680 was used as the standard, having IC
50 of 44.6 µM (HCT-8), 19.4 µM (A-549), 27.3 µM (HeLa), and 63.4 µM (Hep-G2). Molecular docking studies revealed that compound
6 formed a major interaction with Aurora A, which showed 35-fold greater selectivity for Aurora A than for Aurora B. Additionally, compound
6 caused HeLa cells to arrest in the G2/M cell cycle. The IC
50 values of compound
6 were 0.012 and 0.043 µM against Aurora A and Aurora B respectively whereas that of standard VX-680 were 0.261 and 0.453 µM respectively
[31]. Filho et al. (2021) synthesized 6-ferrocene/heterocycle-2-aminopyrimidine and 5-ferrocene-1H-Pyrazole derivatives by microwave-assisted Atwal reaction and carried out docking, machine learning, and anti-proliferative activity studies of these agents. The compound
7 showed the potent anticancer activity. It was tested on 4 cancer cell lines like HCT116, PC3, HL60, and SNB19 with IC
50 values of 56.99, 33.56, 70.26, and 85.11 µM respectively. The docking studies revealed that the compound
7 is the most active compound having the binding energy of −6.3 Kcal/mol with targeted protein (PDB:4HLW)
[32].
El-Deen et al. (2022) designed and synthesized pyridothienopyrimidine derivatives and evaluated their anticancer and antimicrobial activity. The cytotoxic activity of newly synthesized compounds was evaluated against three cell lines, MCF-7, HepG-2, and WISH. The compounds that showed potent activity were examined as EGFR kinase inhibitors. The most potent anticancer agent was compound
8 with IC
50 values of 1.17, 1.52, and 417.55 µM against the cell lines HepG-2, MCF-7, and WISH, respectively. It is compared with the control drug Doxorubicin with IC
50 values of 2.85, 3.58, and 432.10 µM against the cell lines HepG-2, MCF-7, and WISH, respectively. In terms of in vitro enzymatic inhibitory activity against EGFR kinase, compound
8 showed IC
50 of 7.27 nM as compared to control Erlotinib with IC
50 value of 27.01 nM
[33]. Al-Anazi et al. (2022) synthesized pyrazoline and pyrimidine derivatives as novel epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and tested their anticancer property. All the synthesized compounds showed good anticancer activity. Among them the compound
9 showed the most potent activity against MCF-7 cell line with the IC
50 value of 5.5 µM and selective index 18.18 as compared to tamoxifen standard with IC
50 value of 26.95 µM
[34].
El-Metwally et al. (2021) synthesized thieno pyrimidine-based derivatives as potent VEGFR-2 kinase inhibitors and evaluated their anti-cancer properties using MTT against the HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 human cancer cell lines using sorafenib as a positive control. The most potent derivative reported was compound
10 with IC
50 value 0.23 µM against the MCF-7 cell line which is similar to the control sorafenib with IC
50 value 0.23 µM
[35].
Madia et al. (2021) designed and synthesized pyrimidine-based analogues and evaluated their anticancer activity against HT-29, U-87 MG, MDA-MB231, CAL27, and FaDu cancer cell lines. Each of synthesized compounds showed excellent anticancer activity. Among them, compound
11 showed excellent activity at 24 and 48 h time intervals with EC
50 values of 10.2, 22.0, 18.0, 9.7, and 26.2 and 5.4, 7.5, 7.9, 4.3, and 8.5 µM, respectively with control RDS 3442 (EC
50 values of 51.8, 75.2, 34.8, 54.2, and 69.3 at 48 h respectively)
[36].
All the reported pyrimidine derivatives (Figure 3 (1–11)) were acting as anticancer agents. The most potent compound among them was compound 10, having the lowest IC50 value of 0.23 µM against MCF-7 cell line. It has a hydrazine moiety joined by phenyl amino linkage and pyrimidine with benzothiophene nucleus which may be responsible for its excellent activity.
Figure 3. Pyrimidine derivatives (1–11) as anticancer agents.
2.2. Quinoline Derivatives as Anticancer Agents
Quinoline is a nitrogen containing heterocyclic aromatic compound, also known as 1-aza-napthalene or benzopyridine. Its molecular weight is 129.16 and molecular formula is C
9H
7N. The log P value is 2.04 while the pKb and pKa values are 4.85 and 9.5, respectively. Quinoline is a weak tertiary base and with acids it can produce salt and exhibits reactions akin to those of pyridine and benzene. Numerous naturally occurring chemicals (Cinchona Alkaloids) and pharmacologically active molecules with a wide range of biological activities include the quinoline nucleus in their structure. Diverse pharmacological activities (anticonvulsant, analgesic, cardiotonic, antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, and anti-malarial) of quinoline have been reported
[37].
Hamdy et al. (2019) conducted anticancer study on quinoline based heterocycles targeting Bcl-2. Out of these, Compound
12 showed excellent activity in MDA-MB-231, HeLa, KG1a, and Jurkat with the IC
50 values of 0.54, 1.42,1.21, and >100 µM respectively. This compound showed the IC
50 value of 0.15 µM against Bcl-2 compared with Gossypol (IC
50 value of 0.60 µM). Compound
12 had sub-micromolar anti-proliferative activity in cancer cell lines that express Bcl-2, as well as a sub-micromolar IC
50 value in an ELISA experiment using the Bcl2-Bim peptide
[38]. Mathada et al. (2022) studied the anticancer effect of quinoline and its derivatives. Hence, 62 compounds were synthesized. Out of these, the most potent compound was found to be compound
13, which showed a potent anticancer effect against three cell lines, MDA-MB-231, HeLa, and SMMC-7721 with IC
50 values of 0.12, 0.08, and 0.34 µM respectively. Etoposide was used as standard drug with IC
50 values of 5.26, 2.98, and 3.48 µM respectively. Compound
13 had a unique capacity to induce apoptosis in HeLa cells, halt the cell cycle at the G0/G1 phase, elevate intracellular ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species) levels, and decrease mitochondrial membrane potential. Additionally, it had the ability to significantly reduce MEK1 kinase activity and disrupt the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK transduction pathway
[39].
Katariya et al. (2020) performed the studies on anticancer, antimicrobial activities of quinoline based hydrazone analogues. Nine compounds out of all the tested compounds showed significant anti-cancer activity at 10 µM. These compounds were then screened at 10-fold dilutions of five different concentrations (0.01, 0.1, 1, 1, and 100 µM) with GI
50 values ranging from 0.33 to 4.87 µM and LC
50 values ranging from 4.67 µM to >100 µM. The most active molecule, compound
13, had a mean graph midpoint (MG-MID) GI
50 value of 1.58 µM, which was significantly lower than commercially available standards Bendamustine and chlorambucil (60 and 52 µM, respectively). The IC
50 value of compound
14 was 132 µM against the NIH/3T3 cell line, which was significantly higher than the GI
50 values of compound
14 against the NCI 60 cancer cell lines, which demonstrated that compound
14 was highly selective for cancer cells at concentrations that are lower than the effective concentration against healthy cell lines
[40].
George et al. (2019) synthesized the new derivatives of quinoline, i.e., 4,5- dihydropyrazoles as EGFR inhibitors and evaluated their anti-proliferative activity. The newly synthesized compounds were tested against HeLa, MCF-7, and DLD1 cancer cell lines as well as normal fibroblast WI-38. Eight compounds showed potent activity towards the DLD1 cell line and it was safe to normal cell lines. The most active compound was compound
15, with IC
50 values of 0.227, 0.136, 1.277, and >94.5 µM against the cell lines MCF-7, HeLa, DLD1, and WI-38, and it was compared to the control drug CHS 828 with the IC
50 values of 0.018, 0.040, 2.315, and >134.71 µM respectively. Compound
15 showed the EGFR inhibitory activity with IC
50 value of 31.8 nM as compared to the control Gefitinib 29.16 nM
[41]. Koprulu et al. (2021) had conducted anticancer activity and molecular docking studies of quinoline derivatives. The cytotoxic activity of synthesized piperazine substituted quinoline derivatives were tested against three cell lines, namely rat glioblastoma (C6), human cervical cancer (HeLa), and human adenocarcinoma (HT29). The docking studies revealed that compound
16 was the most potent compound for metastatic cancer treatment due to its binding affinity to PLCγ1. The IC
50 values of compound
16 were 100, 144.8, and 117.6 µM against the cell lines, C6, HeLa, and HT29. Further, 5-Fluro Uracil was used as the standard drug with IC
50 values of 163, 469.6, and 501.2 µM
[42].
Ramya et al. (2018) synthesized and evaluated anticancer potential of curcumin inspired 2-chloro/phenoxy quinoline analogues. This research described the synthesis of twenty novel 2-chloro/phenoxyquinoline derivatives inspired by curcumin. The cytotoxic activity of the acquired novel chemical entities toward various tumor cell lines was examined in vitro. The most active compound
17 showed potential cytotoxicity against different cell lines HeLa, HGC, NCI-H460, DU-145, PC-3, and 4T1 with IC
50 values of 5.41, 8.73, 3.96, 3.99, 3.12, and 1.81 µM respectively. The reference drug curcumin had the IC
50 values of 17.11, 33.15, 18.65, and 18.65 µM against the cell lines NCI-H460, DU-145, PC-3, and 4T1, respectively. Additionally, study of ROS levels, DAPI staining, AO-EB labelling, and annexin binding assay showed that the promising compound
16 may cause apoptosis in PC-3 cells and G2/M cell cycle arrest
[43].
Upadhyay et al. (2018) conducted the synthesis and screening of pyrano[3,2-c],quinolones derivatives. One pot multicomponent condensation was carried out between malononitrile, 2,4-dihydroxy-1-methylquinoline, and substituted aromatic aldehydes to create a number of pyrano[3,2-c]quinoline based structural analogues. The compounds were accessed for their cytotoxic and anti-inflammatory activity. Out of these, compound
18 was found to be the most potent anticancer agent and showed 81–53% anti-proliferative inhibition at 1 µM concentration against all cell lines, including ACHN, Panc-1, HCT-116, H-460, and Calu-1, with IC
50 values of 0.1, 1.0, 0.3, 0.3, and 0.5 µM respectively. Flavopiridol, having the IC
50 values of 71, 78, 71, 88, and 74 µM, and gemcitabine, with 73, 74, 73, 71, and 79 µM, respectively, were used as standard
[44].
Hagras et al. (2021) designed, synthesized, and conducted docking studies and anti-proliferative evaluation of newly discovered quinolines. The most effective anti-tubulin polymerization agents are colchicine binding site inhibitors. In order to exhibit the same fundamental pharmacophoric characteristics as colchicine binding site inhibitors, novel quinoline compounds have been developed and synthesized. Using colchicine as a positive control, the synthesized compounds were evaluated in vitro against three human cancer cell lines; MCF-7, HepG-2, and HCT-116. The most potent compound
19 have the IC
50 values of 1.89, 1.43, and 4.21 µM against the cell lines HePG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 respectively. The control drug colchicine with IC
50 values of 7.4, 9.3, and 10.4 µM, respectively, and its effect on cell cycle distribution were evaluated. The outcomes showed that compound
19 had the ability to stop the cell cycle at the G2/M phase. A double-staining test with annexin V and PI was performed to investigate the apoptotic effect of the synthesized compounds. Compound
19 caused HepG-2 cells to apoptosis thirteen times more frequently than control cells
[45]. Mirzaei et al. (2019) synthesized novel quinoline chalcone hybrids and conducted studies on the structure–activity relationship and docking studies for their anticancer potential as active tubulin inhibitors. Four different human cancer cell lines, including A2780/RCIS (Cisplatin-resistant human ovarian carcinoma), A2780 (human ovarian carcinoma), normal Huvec cells, MCF-7 (human breast cancer cells), and MCF-7/MX (Mitoxantrone-resistant human breast cancer cells), were used to test the cytotoxic activity of synthesized substances. The most potent compound was compound
20 with IC
50 values of 2.32, 2.615, 4.96, 2.32, and 4.44 µM against the cell lines A2780, A2780/RCIS, MCF-7, MCF-7/MX, HUVEC respectively. It is compared with the standard drug CA-4 with IC
50 values of 0.24, 0.22, 0.43, and 1.49 µM against the cell lines A2780, A2780/RCIS, MCF-7, and MCF-7/MX, respectively
[46]. Chate et al. (2018) investigated novel spiro-pyrimido[5,4-b]quinoline-10,50-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine] derivatives as promising anticancer agents. By using the MTT assay, the newly synthesized compounds’ anticancer effects were assessed in vitro against the A431, PC-3, MCF-7, and MCF-10A cancer cell lines. Out of these, the most potent was compound
21, having an IC
50 value of 36.25 µM for MCF-10A (normal breast epithelial cell lines), indicating five times more selectivity for MCF-7 cancer cells with the IC
50 value of 7.82 µM. Sunitinib was used as a control having IC
50 values of 6.48, 7.25, 20.66, and 34.55 µM against the cancer cell lines A-41, MCF-7, PC-3, and MCF-10A, respectively
[47].
While evaluating the above reported quinoline derivatives (Figure 4 (12–21)), most of the compounds were evaluated with their cytotoxic activity commonly against HeLa, MCF-7, and HCT-116 cells. Compounds 13, 15, and 18 were reported to be potent anticancer compounds but the most potent one among them was compound 13 with the lowest IC50 value of 0.08 µM on HeLa cells, 0.12 µM on MDA-MB-231, and 0.34 µM on SMMC-7721, having a steroid nucleus directly attached with quinoline along with a hydrazine chain. This also demonstrated the ability to cause apoptosis in HeLa cells.
Figure 4. Quinoline derivatives (12–21) as anticancer agents.
2.3. Carbazole Derivatives as Anticancer Agents
A polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon called carbazole has a broad aromatic system and a central nitrogen atom that exhibits substantial electron delocalization. It consists of a five-membered nitrogen-containing ring sandwiched between two six-membered benzene rings. It has an indole-like structure, but at the indole position 2–3, a second benzene ring is fused to the five-membered ring. When creating electron donor-electron acceptor (D-A) chemical dyes, carbazole is frequently used as a conjugated bridge
[48].
Murali et al. (2017) studied the creation of hetero annulated isoxazolo-, pyrido-, and pyrimido carbazoles, also screening them for in vitro anticancer activity. By cyclo condensation with the appropriate reactants (hydroxylamine hydrochloride, malononitrile, and guanidine nitrate), the newly synthesized heterocycles isoxazolo-, pyrido-, and pyrimidocarbazoles were produced from the readily available 2-(3′-bromo-4′-methoxybenzylidene)-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol. All the synthesized substances were tested for in vitro cytotoxicity against the A-549 and MCF-7 human cancer cell lines. Compound
22 demonstrated substantial activity against MCF-7 with the IC
50 value of 20 µM as compared to cisplatin IC
50 value of 18 µM. All other compounds showed moderate to powerful activity and consequent apoptotic cell death, which was demonstrated by AO/EB and DAPI of fluorescence microscopy analysis
[49]. Wang et al. (2011) designed and synthesized substituted 11H-benzo[a] carbazole-5-carboxamides as novel anticancer agents and tested them against human cancer A549 and HCT-116 cell lines. The most potent derivative was compound
23 with IC
50 value 8.2, 9.5 µM against the cancer cell lines A549, and HCT-116 respectively. Amonafide was used as the standard with IC
50 values 8.1 µM and 15.3 µM, respectively
[50]. Debray et al. (2010) synthesized N-ethoxycarbonyl-N-arylguanidines by the montmorillonite K-10 catalyzed cyclization, which provides access to pyrimido[4,5-c]carbazole and pyrimidoo[5,4-b]indole derivatives. Further, 3-aminocarbazole and 3-aminoindole were converted into two novel heterocycles, pyrimido[4,5-c]carbazole and pyrimido[5,4-b]indole, respectively. With the aid of montmorillonite K-10 clay as a catalyst and microwave irradiation, the essential Friedel–Crafts intramolecular cyclization was accomplished. The micromolar IC
50 of the pyrimido[4,5-c]carbazole derivative was significant against cancer cell lines. The most potent compound was found to be compound
24 with the IC
50 values 17 and 17 µM against the cancer cell lines HL60 N and HL60 MX2, respectively. Etoposide is used as a reference with IC
50 values of 1.3 µM and 11.9 µM
[51].
Sun et al. (2017) synthesized novel carbazole sulfonamide derivatives and evaluated their anti-proliferative activity and aqueous solubility as an antitumor agent. A number of novel carbazole sulfonamide derivatives were produced by the current optimization of IG-105 on the carbazole-ring. Each compound’s anti-proliferative effectiveness was tested on HepG2 cells. When tested for anti-proliferative activity against MIA PaCa-2 (pancreatic cancer), MCF-7 (breast cancer), and Bel-7402 (hepatocellular/liver cancer), compounds that had shown action superior or equivalent to that of IG-105 against HepG2 were found to be effective. Five of the seven substances were chosen for further investigation and discovered to have IC
50 values against the four cell lines that were comparable to those for IG-105. The activity of two compounds, compound
25a and
25b against HepG2 and MCF-7 (IC
50 values of 0.01 and 0.07 µM) was close to that of the positive controls podophyllotoxin and CA-4. The most potent compound out of these two was Compound
25a with IC
50 value against HEPG2 was 0.012 µM as compared to the controls podophyllotoxin with IC
50 value 0.003 µM and CA-4 with IC
50 value of 0.002 µM respectively
[52]. Arya et al. (2018) performed eco-compatible synthesis of highly functionalized pyrido[2,3-a] carbazole derivatives and tested them for their cytotoxic effects on cancer cell lines MCF-7 and A549. The result revealed compound
26 as the potent anticancer compound with lowest IC
50 values of 45 µM and 50 µM against MCF-7 and A549 while the control drug Ellipticine presented IC
50 values of 73 µM and 65 µM, respectively
[53]. Padmaja et al. (2014) tested the anticancer activity of novel pyrano[3,2-c]carbazole derivatives which induce cell death by the inhibition of tubulin polymerization. A facile one-pot, three-component reaction using malononitrile-ethyl cyanoacetate, aromatic aldehydes, and 4-hydroxycarbazoles, catalyzed by trimethylamine was used to synthesize pyrano[3,2-c]carbazole derivatives. Investigations were performed to test their ability to inhibit the proliferation of several cancer cell lines, including K562, MDA-MB-231, HeLa, and A549. The most potent anticancer agent was compound
27 with IC
50 values of 0.43, 1.13, 3.41, 6.12, and 69.24 μM against the cell lines MDA-MB 231, K562, A549, HeLa, and L929, respectively. Combrestatin A-4 (CA-4) was used as the control. This compound causes apoptosis by preventing tubulin polymerization and G2/M phase arrest of the cell cycle
[54]. Patel et al. (2021) synthesized and characterized coumarin carbazole based functionalized pyrimidines, evaluated the anticancer effect, and performed molecular docking studies. The synthesized compounds were evaluated against three cell lines (HeLa, NCI-H520, and NRK-52E). Compound
28a and
28b were reported to be most active because of their ability to cause apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Both of these molecules demonstrated high binding affinity towards CDK2 protein. Compound
28a was the most potent anticancer agent with IC
50 values of 12.59 µM, 11.26 µM, and 28.37 µM against the cell lines HeLa, NCI-H520, and NRK-52E respectively. It was compared to the control Cisplatin with IC
50 values of 7.75, 10.41, and 12.93 µM and 5-Flurouracil with IC
50 values of 55.72, 8.36, and 46.68 µM, respectively
[55]. Huang et al. (2021) performed the synthesis of novel carbazole derivatives as selective and potent anticancer drugs, as well as performed their biological evaluation and structure–activity relationship studies. The in vitro cytotoxic effects of two series of carbazole compounds against the three cell lines A875, HepG2, and MARC145 were assessed. Compared to the control 5-fluorouracil, the results showed that some of these carbazole derivatives had much better cytotoxic effects against the examined cell lines. Particularly, the carbazole acylhydrazone compounds
29a and
29b showed strong inhibitory effect against cancer cells, but essentially no activity against normal cells. Particularly, compound
29a showed significantly selective proliferation inhibition on cancer and normal cell lines with the selectivity index up to 13, and it had a stronger inhibitory effect on the A875 with IC
50 value of 7.65 µM and HepG2 cell lines with IC
50 value of 8.16 µM compared to the normal cells line MARC145 with IC
50 value of > 105 µM. The control 5-Flurouracil had IC
50 values of 72.33, 81.94, and 77.56 µM against A875, HepG2, and MARC145 cell lines, respectively
[56].
Chen et al. (2018) synthesized racemic and chiral carbazole aminoalcohols and tested their anticancer potential. It was found that the topoisomerase I was inhibited due to a number of reasons, e.g., substitution site, heterocycle, chirality, and length of alkyl chain. MDA-MB-231, HCT116, and A549 cancer cell lines were used as test subjects and carbazole amino alcohols with potent topo I inhibitory activities, such as pyrrolidine derivative and propyl- to pentyl- amine derivatives, demonstrated good anticancer activities. The most potent compound was compound
30 with broad spectrum anti-tumor activity against 15 cancer cell lines. The IC
50 values were 7.9, 4.6, 2.8, 7.5, 3.9, 3.4, 3.8, 2, 4.8, 1.6, 1.5, 1.7, 1.7, 1.7, and 2.2 μM against A549, HCT116, MDA-MB-231, HeLa, H3122, BT549, BEL7402, 3AO, HO-8910, Rh30, Pfeiffer, Molm13, OC1-AML2, Jurkat, and HL60 cell lines, respectively
[57].
Vairavelu et al. (2014) performed solvent-free synthesis of heteroannulated carbazoles using grinding conditions and a number of new carbazole analogues. Templates for isoxazolo, pyrido, pyrazolo, and pyrimido were developed and synthesized in high yield. The synthesized compounds were tested in vitro for their anticancer potential. Compound
31 was the most potent anticancer compound with IC
50 values of 0.37 µM and 15.12 µM against HeLa and AGSb cell lines respectively. Ellipticine was used as the control with IC
50 values of 4.12 and 7.33 µM, respectively
[58].
Among the above-mentioned carbazole derivatives (Figure 5 (22–31)), the most potent one was compound 25a having a pyridine ring joined by sulphonamide linkage and substituted with 2,5-dimethoxy group, having the lowest IC50 value of 0.012 µM against the HEPG2 as compared to the control podophyllotoxin with IC50 value of 0.003 µM and CA-4 with IC50 value of 0.002 µM.
Figure 5. Carbazole derivatives (22–31) as anticancer agents.
2.4. Pyridine Derivatives as Anti-Cancer Agents
Pyridine has the chemical formula C
5H
5N and is a fundamental heterocyclic organic molecule. The word “pyridine” is taken from Greek and combines the words “idine” and “pyr,” which both refer to aromatic bases. Picoline, the first pyridine base, was discovered by Anderson in 1846. It took quite some time for Wilhelm Korner and James Dewar to discover its structure. It resembles the well-known and fundamental aromatic molecule benzene in many ways, but with one C-H group replaced by an atom of Nitrogen. Like benzene, pyridine possesses a conjugated system of six delocalized electrons distributed around the heterocyclic ring. The molecule satisfies the Huckel requirements for aromaticity and is planar in nature
[59].
Gomha et al. (2018) performed the studies on anti-tumor activity through the Synthesis of some new pyridine-based heterocyclic compounds. By the reaction of 7-(pyridin-4-yl)-2-thioxo-2,3-dihydropyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidin-4(1H)-one and 2-cyano-N-(1-(pyridin-4-yl)ethylidene)-acetohydrazide with hydrazonoyl halides, 5-amino-N-(1-(pyridin-4-yl)ethylidene)-1H-pyrazole-4-carbohydrazides and 8-(pyridine-4-yl)pyrido[2,3-d][1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrimidin-5(1H)-ones were synthesized. The anti-cancer activity of the synthesized compounds was tested against the HEPG2 cell line. The most potent compound was compound
32, with an IC
50 value of 0.97 µM against the HEPG2 cell line Doxorubicin is used as the standard with an IC
50 value of 0.74 µM
[60]. Fayed et al. (2019) designed, synthesized, and performed molecular modeling studies of coumarin derivatives. The synthesized compounds were evaluated for their cytotoxic activity against different cell lines; HCT-116, MCF-7, A549, and HepG-2. The most potent compound was compound
33 with IC
50 values of 1.11, 6.44, 4.51, and 7.18 µM against the cancer cell lines MCF-7, HCT-116, HepG-2, and A549, respectively. 5-Flurouracil was the standard with IC
50 values of 7.76, 8.78, 8.15, and 7.65 µM, respectively. Compound
33 induced cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase and apoptosis. Caspase-3 is used for stimulating apoptosis
[61]. Nagender et al. (2016) synthesized novel hydrazone and azole-functionalized pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine derivatives. With the key intermediate ethyl 2-(3-amino-6-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridin-1-yl)acetate, a variety of pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine compounds were synthesized. The reaction was carried out with hydrazine hydrate followed by isothiocyanate, acid chloride, and different aldehydes to form 1,2,4 triazoles, oxadiazoles, hydrazones, and thiadiazoles. All the synthesized compounds were screened for anti-cancer activity. With an IC
50 value of 3.2 µM, compound
34 with the trifluoromethylthio group demonstrated excellent action against the lung cancer cell line (A549) compared with the control 5-Fluorouracil with an IC
50 value of 1.7 µM
[62].
El-Naggar et al. (2018) conducted the synthesis and biological evaluation of pyridine-urea derivatives as anti-cancer drugs. All the synthesized compounds were tested for their in vitro antiproliferative activity in breast cancer against the MCF-7 cell line. Two compounds,
35a with IC
50 values of 0.22 µM (48 h) and 1.88 µM (72 h) and
35b with IC
50 values of 0.11 µM (48 h) and 0.80 µM (72 h), were reported to present potent anti-cancer activity against the MCF-7 cell line. The most potent compound was compound
35b with the lowest IC
50 value, while compared to the reference drugs, doxorubicin presented IC
50 values of 1.93 µM (48 h) and 1.07 µM (72 h) and sorafenib with IC
50 values of 4.50 µM (48 h) and 1.71 µM (72 h) respectively
[63].
Dinda et al. (2014) carried out a study on the cytotoxicity of pyridine-wingtip substituted annelated N-heterocyclic carbene complexes of silver (I), gold (I), and gold (III). Three new compounds were synthesized from 1-methyl-2-pyridin-2-yl-2H-imidazo[1,5-a]pyridin-4-ylium chloride. The synthesized complexes were tested for their cytotoxicity against HepG2 (human hepatocellular carcinoma), A549 (human lung adenocarcinoma), HCT 116 (human colorectal carcinoma), and MCF-7 (human breast adenocarcinoma) cells. Compound
36 was the most potent antiproliferative agent with IC
50 values of 4.91, 5.08, 5.23, and 5.18 µM against the cell lines HepG2, HCT-116, A549, and MCF-7, respectively. Cisplatin was used here with IC
50 values of 4.31, 4.89, 6.12, and 4.42 µM, respectively
[64]. El-Gohary et al. (2019) synthesized novel pyrazolo[3, 4-b]pyridine analogs, screened their anti-cancer potential, and performed molecular modeling. An in vitro anti-cancer assay toward MCF-7, HepG2, and Hela cancer cells and in vivo anti-cancer assay over E.A.C. in mice were carried out. The most potent compound was compound
37, with IC
50 values of 3.63, 3.11, and 4.91 µM against the cell lines HepG2, MCF-7, and Hela, respectively. Doxorubicin was used as the reference with IC
50 values of 4.3, 3.97, and 5.17 µM, respectively. According to molecular modeling studies, it was reported that the synthesized compounds bind to DNA through intercalation similar to doxorubicin
[65].
Sangani et al. (2014) designed, synthesized, and evaluated the molecular modeling of pyrazole-quinoline-pyridine hybrids as a potential class of antibacterial and anti-cancer drugs. A one-pot multicomponent reaction was carried out using a base-catalyzed cyclo condensation reaction, and a new series of pyrazole-quinoline-pyridine hybrids were synthesized. All the compounds synthesized tested for in-vitro anti-cancer and antimicrobial activity. The most potent compound with the lowest cytotoxicity was compound
38, compared to reference drug Erlotinib with IC
50 values of 0.13, 0.12, and 0.032 µM, against the cell lines A549, HepG2, and E.G.F.R. respectively. Compound
38 showed three hydrogen bonds and one -π cation interaction with a minimum binding energy of −54.6913 kcal/mol in the molecular docking studies with the catalytic pocket of protein
[66]. Elzahabi (2011) synthesized and characterized some benzazoles bearing pyridine moiety in a search for novel anti-cancer agents. Thirteen new benzazole compounds were synthesized as potential anti-cancer agents. The National Cancer Institute (NCI), U.S.A. chose four derivatives of the produced compounds to be tested for their anti-cancer potential against a panel of 60 cancer cell lines at a single high dose. Compounds 4-[p-chlorophenyl]pyridine and 4-[pmethoxyphenyl]pyridine were chosen for further testing at five doses after exhibiting a broad and moderate anti-cancer activity against 41 tumor cell lines belonging to the nine subpanels employed. The compounds
39a and
39b showed excellent activity in HOP-92 cells with GI
50 values of 0.275 µM and 2.65 µM, respectively. Regarding colon cancer, compound
39a’s GI
50 value against HCT116 was 3.47 µM, and the most sensitive cell line in this subpanel was KM12 towards compound
39b with GI
50 4.79 µM. The most sensitive lines for compounds
39a and
39b were SF-539 and SNB-75, belonging to C.N.S. cancer cell lines with GI
50 2.07 µM and 2.36 µM, respectively
[67].
Zheng (2014) researched the design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel combretastatin-A4 pyridine-bridged analogs as anti-cancer drugs. The synthesized compounds potentially suppressed cell growth and survival, stopped the cell cycle, and prevented angiogenesis and the development of blood vessels, similar to CA-4 (combretastatin-A4). The IC
50 values of compound
40a against three cancer cell lines were 0.0031, 0.089, and 0.0038 µM against MDA-MB-231, A549, and HeLa, respectively, and for compound
40b were 0.0046, 0.044, and 0.0014 µM respectively. The reference compound used was combretastatin-A4 with IC
50 values of 0.0028, 0.0038, and 0.0009 µM, respectively
[68]. Abbas et al. (2015) synthesized novel pyridines having an imidazole moiety. The one-pot multicomponent reaction of 5-acetyl imidazole, substituted benzaldehyde (or terephthaldehyde), malonitrile (or ethyl cyanoacetate or diethyl malonate), and ammonium acetate was carried out to produce a novel series of pyridine and bipyridine derivatives. Some recently synthesized compounds were tested for their anti-cancer activities against the human breast cell line (MCF-7) and liver carcinoma cell line (HEPG2) with the reference Doxorubicin IC
50 values of 0.46 µM and 0.42 µM, respectively. The most potent compound was compound
41, with IC
50 values of 1.7 and 6 µM, respectively
[69]. Ivasechko (2022) synthesized novel pyridine-thiazole hybrid molecules as potential anti-cancer agents and evaluated their anti-cancer activity against several kinds of tumors, e.g., carcinomas of the breast, lung, colon, glioblastoma, and leukemia. Two compounds showed the highest anti-cancer activity. The most potent compound reported was compound
42, with an IC
50 value of 2.79 µM against the MCF-7 cell line. Doxorubicin was standard with an IC
50 value of 1.04 µM against the MCF-7 cell line
[70].
Among the above-reported potent anti-cancer compounds (Figure 6 (32–42)) having a pyridine moiety, the most active compound which showed the best cytotoxic activity was compound 40a (a diaryl compound joined by pyridine ring. Diaryl rings were substituted with methoxy group on different positions). It showed the lowest IC50 value of 0.0031 µM, 0.089 µM, and 0.0038 µM against the three human cancer cell lines MDA-MB-23, A549, and HeLa, respectively.
Figure 6. Pyridine derivatives (32–42) as anticancer agents.